BUDGET BASICS TRAINING TOPIC: DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS. Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP)

Similar documents
17 percent of Contracting Entities (CEs) reviewed in Program Year (PY) 2015 did not have an adequate financial system.

NRCS Conservation Programs Update

United States and Canadian Cattle

United States and Canadian Cattle and Sheep

United States and Canadian Cattle and Sheep

TRACKING EXPENSES. All Programs/SPSP

Notice of Solicitation of Applications for the Biorefinery, Renewable Chemical, and Biobased Product Manufacturing

DATE: April 4, All TEFAP Agencies. TEFAP Packet

Slide 1 Sponsors Who Receive Vended Meals

United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service

Livestock Watering Systems. Mark Green Lead Resource Conservationist USDA-NRCS Springfield, MO

Grain Crushings and Co- Products Production 2017 Summary

NRCS Water Quality Practices

Livestock Watering Systems

NRCS Standards and Criteria for Dead Animal Composting

WORKFORCE CONNECTIONS, INC. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES

All cows and heifers that have calved, at 39.0 million, were down 2 percent from July 1, 2012.

Grain Crushings and Co- Products Production 2016 Summary

Healthy Food Retail 101

Texas Department of Agriculture TX-UNPS FDP Module. Guide to CE Delivery Order Form And FDP Reports.July 23, 2012

All cattle and calves in the United States on July 1, 2018 totaled 103 million head, 1 percent above the 102 million head on July 1, 2017.

Texas Farm to School Program. Texas Department of Agriculture Commissioner Todd Staples Food & Nutrition Division

Water Talk Series

Locally Led Conservation & The Local Work Group. Mark Habiger NRCS

Production per cow in the 23 major States averaged 1,753 pounds for February, 21 pounds above February 2013.

Supervisor s Office 5162 Valleypointe Parkway Roanoke, VA

The number of milk cows on farms in the 23 major States was 8.74 million head, 1,000 head more than July 2017, but 8,000 head less than June 2018.

Milk production in the United States during August totaled 18.3 billion pounds, up 1.4 percent from August 2017.

The number of milk cows on farms in the 23 major States was 8.73 million head, 57,000 head more than November 2016, but unchanged from October 2017.

Flour Milling Products

United States Department of Agriculture. Forest Service. Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest. September 2014

Flour Milling Products 2017 Summary

Flour Milling Products

Cattle on Feed. United States Cattle on Feed Up 1 Percent

Flour Milling Products

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Cattle on Feed. United States Cattle on Feed Up 4 Percent

Cattle on Feed. United States Cattle on Feed Up 4 Percent

Cattle on Feed. Special Note

DISASTER ASSISTANCE. Emergency Assistance for Livestock, Honeybees and Farm-Raised Fish Program (ELAP) - Livestock Assistance LIVESTOCK DEATH LOSSES

Milk Production, Disposition, and Income 2014 Summary

2014 Farm Bill FACT SHEET. The Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program for 2015 and Subsequent Years

Flour Milling Products

Flour Milling Products

Cattle on Feed. United States Cattle on Feed Up 2 Percent

Rick Sherman Farm to School / School Garden Coordinator

Wheat Objective Yield Survey Data,

Cattle on Feed. United States Cattle on Feed Up 9 Percent

Milk Production. January Milk Production up 2.7 Percent

WORKFORCE CONNECTIONS, INC. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES

United States and Canadian Cattle and Sheep

ART & SCIENCE OF GRAZING MANAGEMENT Science. Art. This is NOT the Goal! Why Management-intensive Grazing (MiG)?

Short Form Botany Resource Reports:

Corn Objective Yield Survey Data,

National Soil Health Initiative

Botany Resource Reports:

Production per cow in the 23 major States averaged 1,891 pounds for January, 17 pounds above January 2013.

Civil Rights Impact Analysis for Sault Ste. Marie Conveyance/Raco Construction Project

Drainage Water Management: Optimizing nutrient use while managing risk. Presented by: Rob Sampson NRCS National Water Management Engineer

Crop Progress. Corn Mature Selected States [These 18 States planted 93% of the 2015 corn acreage]

Crop Progress. Corn Planted - Selected States [These 18 States planted 92% of the 2017 corn acreage]

Focus on Financial Resources. Kristin Lambert, WI DNR Chris Miller, NRCS

Crop Progress. Corn Planted - Selected States [These 18 States planted 92% of the 2017 corn acreage] Corn Emerged - Selected States ISSN:

Meat Animals Production, Disposition, and Income 2015 Summary

Crop Progress. Corn Planted - Selected States [These 18 States planted 92% of the 2016 corn acreage] Corn Emerged - Selected States ISSN:

Cattle on Feed. United States Cattle on Feed Up 1 Percent

Winter Wheat Seedings

Crop Progress. Corn Harvested Selected States [These 18 States harvested 94% of the 2017 corn acreage]

Cattle. January 1 Cattle Inventory Up 3 Percent

Vegetables. Asparagus Production Up 13 Percent from 2017 Onion Production Down 5 Percent from 2017 Strawberry Production Down 1 Percent from 2017

Capacity of Refrigerated Warehouses 2017 Summary

Honey Final Estimates

Crop Progress. NASS Survey Update!

Steers weighing 500 pounds and over, as of January 1, 2018, totaled 16.4 million head, down slightly from January 1, 2017.

Crop Progress. Corn Dented Selected States [These 18 States planted 92% of the 2017 corn acreage] Corn Mature Selected States ISSN:

Crop Progress. Special Note

Crop Progress. Corn Silking Selected States [These 18 States planted 92% of the 2017 corn acreage]

Milk Production. January Milk Production up 1.8 Percent

Announcement of Class and Component Prices United States Department of Agriculture

Announcement of Advanced Prices and Pricing Factors United States Department of Agriculture

Announcement of Class and Component Prices United States Department of Agriculture

Puerto Rico - Various

Soybean Objective Yield Survey Data,

Grain Stocks. Corn Stocks Down 7 Percent from September 2017 Soybean Stocks Up 45 Percent All Wheat Stocks Up 5 Percent

Announcement of Class and Component Prices United States Department of Agriculture

Announcement of Class and Component Prices United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service. February Building A Food Hub From the Ground Up: A Facility Design Case Study of Tuscarora Organic Growers

Hungry Creek Watershed Road Maintenance and Stony Quarry Development

Grain Stocks. Corn Stocks Up Slightly from September 2015 Soybean Stocks Up 3 Percent All Wheat Stocks Up 21 Percent

Grain Stocks. Corn Stocks Up 32 Percent from September 2016 Soybean Stocks Up 53 Percent All Wheat Stocks Down 11 Percent

Cattle on Feed. United States Cattle on Feed Down 6 Percent

Hop Area Harvested, Yield, Production, Price, and Value States and United States:

Proposed Action. for the. North 40 Scrub Management Project

Rockbridge County Public Service Authority

BACKGROUND DECISION. June 2016 Page 1 of 6

Mob Grazing vs. Tight Grazing vs. Low Utilization


Cattle on Feed. United States Cattle on Feed Up 5 Percent

Angela Olige Chief Administrator Food and Nutrition

Decision Memo. Programmatic Forest Plan Amendment for Cultural Resource Protection Standards and Guidelines. United States Department of Agriculture

Transcription:

BUDGET BASICS TRAINING TOPIC: DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP)

Acknowledgment Statement 2 You understand and acknowledge that: the training you are about to take does not cover the entire scope of the program; and that you are responsible for knowing and understanding all handbooks, manuals, alerts, notices and guidance, as well as any other forms of communication that provide further guidance, clarification or instruction on operating the program. Texas Department of Agriculture

Training Objectives 3 By the end of this training, participants will be able to: Define direct and indirect costs. Texas Department of Agriculture

Training Outline 4 Introduction Direct and Indirect Costs Conclusion Texas Department of Agriculture

References for this Training 5 FNS Instruction 796-2, Revision (Rev.) 3, Financial Management Child and Adult Care Food Program http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/care/management/796-2.pdf CACFP Handbooks TDA Square Meals Website http://www.squaremeals.org Under F&N resources, select Tools & Links, then select Links and choose FNS Instruction 796-2 under the Government heading Texas Department of Agriculture

Direct and Indirect Costs Texas Department of Agriculture

Allowable Costs Direct Costs Indirect Costs Allowable costs can be either direct or indirect 7 Texas Department of Agriculture

Allowable Costs Direct Costs Direct Costs are easily identified and assigned to the CACFP Direct costs are costs incurred specifically for a program or other cost objective, and can be readily identified to a particular objective, such as food service. Examples: Food, wages/salaries of staff working solely in the food service. 8

Allowable Costs Indirect Costs cannot be easily identified or assigned to the CACFP Indirect Costs Indirect costs are costs typically incurred for the benefit of multiple programs, functions, or other cost objectives, and therefore cannot be readily or specifically identified with a particular program or other cost objective. 9

Allowable Costs Examples: Administrative overhead (may include, but not limited to, fringe benefits, accounting, payroll, purchasing, facilities management, utilities). Indirect Costs 10 Only the share of costs that benefit the CACFP can be assigned to the CACFP. If the CE claims indirect costs, the rate must be part of their cost allocation plan. A cost allocation plan is a written explanation of how costs are classified.

Cost Categories Administrative Costs Operating Costs Can be either direct or indirect costs Administrative and operating costs can be either direct or indirect costs 11

Cost Categories Administrative Costs 12 Administrative costs are allowable expenses related to planning, organizing and managing a food service under CACFP, and allowed by TDA F&N. Examples: Salaries, wages, and fringe benefits for staff that approve income eligibility forms, provide training, and monitor sites.

Cost Categories Operating Costs Operating costs are allowable expenses for serving meals to eligible participants in eligible sites. Examples: Food, nonfood supplies, foodservice equipment. 13

QUESTION How are direct costs different from indirect costs? 14 Answer: Direct costs are incurred specifically for a program or other cost objective and can be readily identified to a particular objective, such as food service. On the other hand, indirect costs typically incurred for the benefit of multiple programs, functions, or other cost objectives and therefore cannot be readily or specifically identified with a particular program or other cost objective. Direct costs are easily identified and assigned to the CACFP. However, indirect costs cannot be easily identified or assigned to the CACFP.

Conclusion Texas Department of Agriculture

16 Costs can be direct or indirect

Acknowledgment Statement 17 You understand and acknowledge that: the training you have completed does not cover the entire scope of the program; and that you are responsible for knowing and understanding all handbooks, manuals, alerts, notices and guidance, as well as any other forms of communication that provide further guidance, clarification or instruction on operating the program. Texas Department of Agriculture

The Texas Department of Agriculture s Food and Nutrition Division is funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. The U.S. Department of Agriculture prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual s income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) If you wish to file a Civil Rights program complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html, or at any USDA office, or call (866) 632-9992 to request the form. You may also write a letter containing all of the information requested in the form. Send your completed compliant form or letter to us by mail at U.S. Department of Agriculture, Director, Office Adjudication, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, by fax (202) 690-7442 or email at program.intake@usda.gov. 18 Individuals who are deaf, hard of hearing or have speech disabilities may contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339; or (800) 845-6136 (Spanish). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.