Session 1* Case study of an alliance railway renovation project Lielahti Kokemäki (Liekki) Pekka Petäjäniemi Finnish Transport Agency

Similar documents
Integrated Lean Project Delivery. Glenn Ballard University of California, Berkeley

Äänekoski bioproduct mill s transport links Railway project. Value-for-money report Implementation stage

Alliancing in Tampere, Finland The Tunnel of Rantaväylä. Viikko 39/2012

Railroad Streamlines Operations With RFID. VR Transpoint Mikko Särkkä, Head of IT, Logistics

MEASURING RAILWAY VEHICLES AND COMPONENTS

Planning, Reporting and Regulatory Framework

Banedanmark TMS. ETCS as the foundation for attractive and efficient railway service

Outsourcing experiences from Sweden

THEFUTURERAILWAY THE INDUSTRY S RAIL TECHNICAL STRATEGY 2012 WHOLE-SYSTEM APPROACH

Also, the installation and the maintenance of the ballastless track (slab track) are described.

Public Enterprise. Macedonian railway Infrastructure

ADIF TRACK ACCESS CHARGES LAW 38/2015 OF THE RAILWAY SECTOR. PRIME-ENRRB Charging workshop Brussels, 3 rd February 2017

Published by. Deutsche Bahn AG Infrastructure Division Potsdamer Platz Berlin, Germany Last modified: January 2018

Rail Baltica Growth Corridor Russia T N O R C R D O P R O. Warsaw. Berlin. St. Petersburg. Riga. Tallinn. Kaunas.

Vienna Declaration Progress on boosting rail freight

Rural transport survey techniques Session: 5.5 Part 1

Tenders and procurement of Rail Baltica. Indrek Orav 2015

Rural transport survey techniques. Part 1

EUTRAIN Europe Neighbourhood Cooperation Countries (incl. Russia, CIS, Black Sea, Balkan States) 3rd Regional Workshop Moscow, Russia

22/06/2012. LCC of Track. Peter Veit

Expanding Alliances Facing Future Challenges. Maximising the Potential from Joint Working Through a Programme of Peer Reviews.

Current arrangements and implementation of the reform. Ms Laura Eiro, Director of Markets Unit

Carbon Neutral Helsinki 2035 Action Plan. Summary

THEFUTURERAILWAY THE INDUSTRY S RAIL TECHNICAL STRATEGY 2012 INFRASTRUCTURE

MOBILITY MEETS BIG DATA

TRANSPORT Policies and progress on transport access

Achieving a Single European Railway Area and reinforcing the attractiveness of the rail sector: The vision of the European Rail Supply Industry

WORLD IDEAS IN SMART BUILDING

Track Management System for Indian Railways

A more detailed description of Transportation, and its programs and initiatives can be found at

European Rail Infrastructure Managers Handbook for International Contingency Management

Quick wins: improving capacity and operations with small means

Investment in the railway

A Digital Single European Railway Area. Kathrin Obst Unit B2-Single European Rail Area European Commission Directorate General Transport and Mobility

The EU White Paper on Transport: The Vision and How to Get There. Ralf Brand, Ph.D. 2 nd Annual Conference SCCER Mobility 26 August 2015

Liikenneviraston tutkimuksia ja selvityksiä x/2018. Pathways to Sustainable Mobility Services in Mid-Sized Cities

Network Safeworking Rules and Procedures

Upgrading Rail Lines for Higher Speeds

Vertical separation of railways

ALSTOM s EXPERIENCE IN HIGH SPEED RAIL SERVICES Leopoldo Maestu. 21June 2006

Extreme Weather Impacts on European Networks of Transport - first findings

Rail Regulatory Body monitors fairness in the market

Moving from Projects to Operational Rail

Mohamed GHAZEL El- Miloudi EL-KOURSI. WP5 - Cost- benefit analysis

Performance design and planning for a mature rail network

Key developments in the Channel Tunnel safety rules and the wider EU framework

How environmental impacts can be part of the DB (Design and Build) Tendering?

Infrastucture Management Division

Transport development between Helsinki-Tallinn twin cities

with Proudfoot, you can.

TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT IN GERMANY

European Rail Research Advisory Council

SUB-URBAN RAILWAYS WORKSHOP

Vehicle authorisation for broad gauge railways

Case study ProRail: understanding the drivers of Railway (in)efficiency

Helsinki-Tallinn Transport Link Feasibility Study of a Railway Tunnel February 2018

How will freight services provide Sweden with goods in the future?

Job Specification. Programme Manager Capital Projects - New Build Growth, Operations Hub

Freight transport policy and measures in Norway

Surface dressing with glassfiber experiences in Estonia. Marek Koit ÜLE Ltd (Estonia)

POSITION DESCRIPTION

Overview. Association of State Rail Safety Managers. Tribal Radioactive Materials Transportation Committee Meeting. Omaha, NE June 4, 2018

UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA

Transit Planning Game

Roadmaps to 2050 FFE (Madrid, Spain) 21 September 2017

Rudolf Schilder. Track Innovations by Austrian Railways (OEBB)

Continuous Improvement in Rail Safety Regulation. December 2013

Integrated Project (IP) Thematic Priority 6: Global Change and Ecosystems

Intelligent Energy Europe (IEE) programme

The Digital Railway Programme

Why need railway infrastructure. Management? Dominique Gardin chairman of the UIC Asset Management working group

The effect of EU Regulation 181/2011 on activities of bus and coach terminals

Transatlantic Cooperation in. Transportation

Developments in the EU Inland Navigation Policy

Indonesia North Java Line Track Rehabilitation Project Report Date August, 2002 Field Survey July, Project Profile and Japan s ODA Loan

Benefits of harmonized regulations for placing in service of railway equipment - European experiences. Peter Mihm Head of Technical Cooperation

Benefit Cost Analysis Narrative

1. The limiting value of super elevation of board gauge in Indian Railways is:

Job Specification. Senior Building Surveyor Construction Growth, Operations Hub. Post number: Grade: 11

APTA LEGAL AFFAIRS SEMINAR PRIVITIZATION PANEL DISSCUSSION FEBRUARY 24, 2014

Transport Revolution. NordBalt Seminar, 1-2 September 2011, Mariehamn

SDAHO Conference /20/18

CENTRAL RAILWAY PROJECT. Appendix A - Scope of the Railway Project

Mobility after the car era

DIRECTIVES. (Text with EEA relevance)

Capacity for Rail. C4R Workshop on Dissemination Paris Dr Björn PAULSSON Trafikverket, Sweden

Staffordshire Alliance. Presentation to the Permanent Way Institute. David Lawrance, Alliance Engineering Manager

Railways in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)

Maintenance of buried corrugated steel bridges in regional Victorian railway

Slab Track Austria. System ÖBB-PORR elastically supported slab

Digitalization at Siemens Rail

Economic and Social Council

An EU coordinated approach to R&I in the rail sector under H2020

Debt policy and investor relations

Italian Sustainability Day Borsa Italiana. Milan, July 2 nd 2018

IT 470a Six Sigma Chapter X

SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES

Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization. Hampton Roads Passenger Rail Study Data Collection. Phase 2A. Presentation To.

The Ohio Department of Transportation Asset Management Playbook Plays for Success

Efficient Digitisation of the Rail Network Environment. Raphael Goudard Mobile Mapping Segment Manager Hexagon Geosystems

Transcription:

Session 1* Case study of an alliance railway renovation project Lielahti Kokemäki (Liekki) Pekka Petäjäniemi Finnish Transport Agency #LIPS2015 @itec_es

It all started in LIPS 2009 in Karlsruhe, Germany LIPS 2009 Jim Ross introduced the Project Alliance EU-legislation is challenge in the public sector LIPS in Washington DC 2010 We can challenge the EU-legislation First Alliance pilot started 2011 No problems with procurement Law 2

Lielahti Kokemäki rail renovation project in short Lenght of railway renovation project 89,6 km Project original budget 91 M (incl. owner s material 20 30 M ) Goal for the renovation is to: Improve safety for railway section and reduce maintenance costs by renewing and repairing constructions (railway sleepers, rails, ballast, culverts, bridges, drainage, build new and tear down old platforms) Reinforce surface and bench structures of the railway track so that it is possible to operate on 250 kn in 80-100 km/h. Besides the renovation there are improvement needs, such as: Changes in bench width Removal of railway grade crossings First Public sector Alliance Pilot in Europe 3

Dialogue inside the owners side Started in May 2010 Coaching was needed Core team started to develop the Finnish approach for Alliancing in June 2010 Wider coaching in two workshops in November 2010 More coaching during the selection process 2.9.2011 4

Changing culture is the issue Building trust, trust, trust Dialogue with the industry Started in May 2010 (1-day workshop) General information of the pilot projects in September 2010 Workshop with the industry in November 2010 Focus on commercial framework and selection criteria More workshops during the selection process 2.9.2011 5

Alliance steps and situation Liekki situation 9/2015 STRA- TEGY ESTABLIS H ALLIANCE PROJECT DEVELOP -MENT PHASE PROJECT DELIVERY IMPLEMENTATIO N PHASE DEFECTS CORRECTION PERIOD 1.4.2011 13.8.2011 1.6.2012 28.2.2015 2019 6

FinnTrA s Strategic Targets for Alliancing To improve productivity of the entire industry To change the culture into a more open and trusting way of working To improve the customer satisfaction for end products faster, better quality and cheaper To develop innovativeness and knowledge 7

Lielahti Kokemäki alliance Value for Money Total optimization Human in center: WE spirit ALLIANCE Way of action: best for project and as the needs arise Collaboration between owner, designers and contructors 8

Project Key Result Areas KRA Safety Schedule Operations Usability Alliance Objectives Zero harm in traffic and work safety on a very good level, open reporting culture Meet all milestone dates and project commissioned and handed over on agreed date Zero reliability incidents, including no late return of track possessions Use of railway track on agreed speed level 2.9.2011 9

Outcomes of Key Result Areas Objectives Failure Minimum Conditions of Satisfaction Results Passenger Traffic Precision [%] 70 85 90 98 99,65 26 Freight Traffic Precesion [%] 70 85 90 98 99,93 9 Project Completion Date 31.05.2016 31.05.2015 28.02.2015 28.02.2015 20 [dd.mm.yyyy] Deviation of Rail Safety [pcs] 25 6 10 0 2,5 5 Safety measurements [%] 75 93 100 95,8 7 Breakthrough KRAperformance Frequency of Accident at Work [pcs/1 Mhours] 100 18 0 6,2 12 Total 79 100 0 79 +100 Value for Money 10

Usability of track under construction In three Years delivery period about 27 000 trains passed the site, because of construction only 42 trains has been delayed or cancelled Accuracy of traffic during constuction: Freight Tarffic 99,93% Personal Traffic 99,65% (Avg. In FIN ~82 %) Cooordinaton between construction site and rail traffic has been excellent! 11

Effective delivery Project manage and effective schedule planning with Lean -tools Traditional project delivery Total Schedule of Project Administrative Plans Final Design Poject Delivery Initialization 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Alliance model Total Schedule of Project Administrative Plans Final Design Poject Delivery Initialization 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Project Delivery has been reduced about 2 years 12

Even fast delivery the project management has been succesfull Total management of construction works, final design and owner s administrative procedures. All decisions are made best for project Taking lean-principles to practice: Last Planner Gemba Walk Kaizen LPDS Collaboration in work coordination, management of change and innovative problem solving create efficiency. Training and guiding play a key role New way of collaboration requires constant learning during the project 13

Safety as performance Safety level has been high level throughout the project delivery Safety process has been created by alliance and it is part of daily action Safety measurements, about 12 000 notes have been made Work Safety Level 95,8% Total hours of work about 640 000 h Work accidents 4 kpl, of which lost working days totally 19 Frequency of work accidents 6,2 (avg. In Finland 20 in railway projects) Traffic Safety Deviations Commucation between Rail Traffic Control and Site Personal Securing the road traffic at level crossing Working in safety device premises without a permission Railroad traffic Safety in good level 14

Target Outturn Costs (TOC) Alliance Leadership Team has accepted TOC 1.6.2012 Level at 1.6.2012 (Begin of Implementation Phase) 85,6 M Fee Risks Owner Project Costs KRA 0 Bonuspool 1,7 M Service Producers Project Costs Total Project Costs 76,6 M 15

Outcomes of the commercial model Actual outturn cost prediction at the end of the construction period: 80,0 M Forecast: Gain +7,0 M Goals are achieved and the success of the project can be well demonstrated Project has been expanded combined constructions with municipalities Value for Money Palkkio Fee for korvattaville project kustannuksille specific costs Projektikohtaiset Risks yhteiskustannukset Owner s costs Direct Palveluntuottajan project costs for korvattavat non-owner kustannukset participant 12%/25,6% Owner has increased the project scope with 4,2 M gained during the alliance Project costs 71,5 M 21.9.2015 16

Target Outturn Costs devided for Technical areas 17 27.373 22.792 Estimated Realized 13.823 11.744 7.604 4.727 3.361 3.952 1.692 1.730 4.889 4.434 8.459 6.894 5.470 7.137 1.214 1.809 1.970 2.054 6.062 6.027 1.059 1.059 k 35.000 30.000 25.000 20.000 15.000 10.000 5.000 0 Design Railway sleepers, rails, ballast Total new level of costs [ 20%]! Excavation work

Public Relations during the Alliance great part of the achievements 18

Site of the Year 2012 in Finland! Exceptional collaboration between owner and service providers 19

Integrated Project Deliveries in Finland

Experience of Alliance + Successful Alliance pilot strong achievements + Remarkable Start for Finnish Alliance Market + No problems with EU Procurement Law + Begin of Project is possible with general plans + Project Management + Alliance Model has been created new skills + Good learning environment + Risk management Commitment of all participants Changes of Key Personal Key Result Areas also for Warranty Period Big Room common for all participants Initiation of Alliance Model way of working 21

Thank You for listening More information liikennevirasto.fi/lielahti-kokemäki Owner s Project Manager Mikko A. Heiskanen, Liikennevirasto p. 029 534 3808 mikko.heiskanen@liikennevirasto.fi Alliance Project Manager Mikko Nyhä, VR Track Oy p. 040 863 0450 mikko.nyha@vr.fi 22