Biofuels and Consumptive Water Use

Similar documents
Impact of Biofuel Production on Hydrology (A Case Study of Klong Phlo Watershed, Eastern Thailand)

BIOEN BIOTA PFPMCG SEI ICRAF SCOPE

Energy & Food Security:

Enhancing water and nutrient use efficiency: The key to transforming agriculture and meeting future food demand.

Implications of biofuels policy mandate in Thailand on water

Är biobränslen ett hållbart globalt alternativ? Gustaf Olsson Lunds Universitet, SIWI Associate Stockolm 23 april 2014

Variable demand as an avenue to sustainable first generation biofuels

ENERGETIC AND WATER COST RELATED TO THE CULTIVATION OF ENERGY CROPS: GENERAL PERSPECTIVES AND A CASE STUDY IN TUSCANY REGION (CENTRAL ITALY)

How do climate change and bio-energy alter the long-term outlook for food, agriculture and resource availability?

Biofuel Policies in Asia

Soil Food & Biofuels Is this sustainable?

Thailand Sugar Industry and Opportunities. 28 January 2016 Upsorn Pliansinchai Vice-President, Mitr Phol Innovation and Research center

Biofuels Toward the Next Generation. BCSEA Energy Solutions, June 10, 2008 Patrick Mazza, Research Director, Climate Solutions

Energy, Agriculture and Food Security. Prabhu Pingali Deputy Director, Agriculture Development

WEF Experiences and Best Practices from ASEAN and East Asia Venkatachalam Anbumozhi

Study on Sustainable Supply and Demand Systems for Bio-fuel in Asia (Abstract of the Final Report)

Economic Sustainability of Bioenergy Production/Use

The emerging bioeconomy in South East Asia: New claims for biomass and land resources

Food Security and World Changes and Trends since 1992

Chapter 1. Introduction

Thailand Bioenergy Technology Status Report 2013

A Systems Approach for Investigating Water, Energy, and Food Scenarios in East-Central Maui

Module 4b. Competing use of biomass

Water Scarcity and Food Security

Putting research knowledge into action

FROM WATER TO BIOETHANOL: THE IMPACT OF CLIMATE VARIABILITY ON THE WATER FOOTPRINT

Can BECCS deliver immediate and efficient carbon dioxide removal?

Alternative Feed-stocks for Bioconversion to Ethanol: a techno-commercial appraisal

The Hydrologic Footprint of Large Scale Bioethanol Production: A Comparison of Florida s Alternatives

WATER PRODUCTIVITY FOR HYBRID MAIZE UNDER IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE. Chittaranjan Ray, Director Nebraska Water Center, University of Nebraska

Biofuels: Environmental Sustainability and Interaction with Food Systems

Alberta s Climate Change Strategy Renewal Update October 9, 2013

Water Footprint of Bioethanol Production from Sugarcane in Thailand

Attracting Investors to Bioenergy the New Zealand case study

Water Footprints of Milk Production

Food vs Energy: Crops for Energy. Dr William D Dar Director General ICRISAT

The water footprint of oil palm crop in Phetchaburi province

Sugar Industry Restructuring by Implementing Biorefinery Technology

SUPPLY MANAGEMENT QUALITY. WATER, AGRICULTURE & FOOD Opportunities and Challenges

Effects of carbon taxes for selected CO 2 stabilization targets on the Thai energy system

The Brazilian Biofuels Experience. Flavio Castelar Executive Director APLA Brasil. GBEP Bioenergy Week Mozambique

Life-Cycle Assessment of Crude Palm Oil Produced at Mill J, PT XYZ, Sumatera Island using Eco-indicator 99

Meeting on Biofuel Technologies and Environmental Impacts Atibaia, August Luiz A Martinelli (CENA/USP)

UNOSD Expert Group Meeting Sustainable Application of Waste-to-Energy in Malaysia. Mohd Ali Hassan

Environmental Assessments of Transportation Biofuels in Europe: A Survey

Brazilian experience with biofuels. Department of Sugar Cane and Agroenergy

Growing Crops for Biofuels Has Spillover Effects

Sustainable Biofuel Development Policies, Programs, and Practices in APEC Economies

Annual Meeting of the REFRORM Group Energy and Climate Policy Towards a Low Carbon Future 17 September 2008 PhD&Young Researchers Day

Introduction: The Growing Importance of Biofuels in Asia

Fertilizers and the Food Challenge Priorities for Technology Deployment

Sustainable Biofuels Development Practices

Bio-based Feedstocks for Fuels and Chemicals

CONGRESSIONAL BRIEFING

6.4.1 Water Intensity (litres per US dollar)

Perspectives on ethanol sustainability in Brazil

Quantification of N 2 O Emissions from Biofuel Feedstock Cultivation

Natural Resource Use Indicators in the SDGs

Bangladesh. Natural Resource Use Indicators in the SDGs. Bangladesh Asia-Pacific Developing. SDG Goal. 6.4 Increase water-use efficiency

Biofuels in Asia Missions

FUZZY MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION OF A MULTI-REGIONAL BIOETHANOL SUPPLY CHAIN

แผนพ ฒนาพล งงานทดแทนและพล งงานทางเล อก พ.ศ Alternative Energy Development Plan: AEDP2015

6.4.1 Water Intensity (litres per US dollar)

european renewable ethanol How renewable ethanol can be produced sustainably

Challenges in the future bio-based economy

REEEP looks at complexity of producing biofuels in South Africa

Nepal. Natural Resource Use Indicators in the SDGs. Nepal Asia-Pacific Developing. SDG Goal Water Intensity (litres per US dollar)

Meeting the rising demand for Animal Source

Report on Australian Pyrolysis Activities

Biofuels and Fuels in European transport: perspectives to 2020 and beyond

Lao PDR. Natural Resource Use Indicators in the SDGs. Lao PDR Asia-Pacific Developing. SDG Goal Water Intensity (litres per US dollar)

Philippines. Natural Resource Use Indicators in the SDGs. Philippines Asia-Pacific Developing. SDG Goal. 6.4 Increase water-use efficiency

Overview. 1. Background. 2. Biofuels in the United States and Canada. 3. Policy objectives. 4. Economic consequences. 5.

1. The Asia-Pacific: An Overview

Ethanol from sugar beet in The Netherlands: energy production and efficiency

How Bioenergy Policy can facilitate increased sustainable energy and food access and the role of BNDES in its domestic and international development

The Outlook for Agriculture and Fertilizer Demand for Urea, Compound and Organic in Indonesia

AGRICULTURE AND BIO-FUELS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

Refinement of Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation Method for Rice Cultivation

The Water Footprint of Bioethanol

Anne Claire De Rouck Sarah Cook. Life Cycle Assessment Sugarcane Farming Sustainability

ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS

The hidden water consumption:

PRIMES Biomass model projections

Developing Energy Crops for Thermal Applications:

Global opportunities for sustainable bioethanol. Lessons from Brazil. Marcelo Poppe. CGEE Center for Strategic Studies and Management

FAO BEFS ASEAN Project Inception Meeting

Davood Nikkami (PhD)

Biofuels and Food Security A consultation by the HLPE to set the track of its study.

Fuel Ethanol in Thailand: What s Next?

IEA Technology Roadmap: Delivering sustainable bioenergy - a key role for advanced biofuels

Water, Agricultural Productivity and Environmental Services

Director OECD Environment Directorate

Pentland Bioenergy Project

Integrated Water Resource Management: Water Security

ENVIRONMENTAL OUTLOOK TO 2050: The consequences of Inaction

Poverty Environment Initiative (PEI) Lao PDR Issues Brief 05/2010: Investments in biofuels BRIEF

Toso Bozic P.Ag Bioenergy specialist Alberta Agriculture and Forestry

The Agro-ecological Sugarcane Zoning in Brazil

Ecosystem Service Effects from Biofuels Production and Use

Transcription:

Biofuels and Consumptive Water Use Upali A. Amarasinghe International Water Management Institute, New Delhi Office Sustainable Bioenergy Symposium: Improving resilience to high food prices and climate change June 2, 2011, FAORAP, Bangkok

International Water Management Institute

Biofuel and Water Demand Regional Impacts Outline Part I Part II 1. Global and regional water demand 2. Regional impacts 3. Water footprints of biofuel in Thailand and Malaysia 4. Impacts of increasing demand biofuel on water resources 5. Issues and concerns 6. Conclusions

1.1 Water Scarcity 2000 a third of the worlds population already Suffering from water scarcity Little or no water scarcity Physical water scarcity Approaching physical water scarcity Economic water scarcity Not estimated Source: Comprehensive Assessment, De Fraiture et al., IWMI

1.2 Water withdrawn in water scarce countries Water for biofuels* Water for food and feed today Future water for food, CA scenario No water scarcity Approaching water scarcity Water scarce 0% 60% 75% 100% % of potentially utilizable water withdrawn for human purposes

1.3. How much land & water now? 1,220 million hectares of crop land (food, feed, fibre, biofuel) Less than 2% for biofuels 7,230 billion m 3 crop consumption water use Less than 1% for biofuels 2,685 bcm irrigation water (withdrawals) Less than 1% for biofuels Substantial part of water depletion is from effective rainfall

1.4. How much land & water in the future? Harvested area 2003 irrigated rain fed biofuels 2030 irrigated rain fed Crop water consumption 400 Million ha 800 1200 1600 2003 irrigation directly from rain biofuels 2030 irrigation directly from rain km 3 2000 4000 6000 8000 Source: Comprehensive Assessment, De Fraiture et al., IWMI

2.1. Impacts of increasing water demand for biofuel Impact of increasing biofuel demand encroach forest land or increase irrigated area and withdrwals or reduce food and feed supply Water quality deterioration (very little attention at present) Will land and water will be an issue for biofules? YES Water scarce and poor countries have the largest risk India, China, Africa etc. What about Thailand and Malaysia?

3.1 Biofuel demand in Malaysia and Thailand Ethanol in Thailand and Biodiesel in Malaysia Demand (million liters/day) Biofuel demand 100 80 60 40 20 0 7.0 1.8 3.9 1.5 79.9 3.3 1.1 48.6 2.8 1.1 2.3 1.8 0.3 1.5 0.9 19.0 13.6 16.6 20.5 25.1 29.7 7.8 2006 2010 2015 2022 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 Gasoline and bioethanol demand Diesel and biodiesel demand Thailand Malaysia Gasoline Sugarcane-bioethanol Cassava-bioethanol Petrolium diesel Biodiesel Ethanol demand in Thailand will increase by 300% between 2010 and 2022 Biodiesel demand in Malaysia will increases by 108% between 2010 and 2030

3.2. Feedstock demand for biofuel production will increase 20 Fedstock demand for bioethanol in Thailand 100 1.5 Bio-diesel and palm oil demand for transport Feedstock demand (million tonnes) 16 12 8 4 0 1.5 1.8 1.8 2.1 1.5 4.1 4.9 6.0 7.1 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.3 2.4 13.9 14.3 14.6 15.1 15.5 11.4 10.0 8.1 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 Cassava Sugarcane molasses 80 60 40 20 0 Share of feedstock (%) Palm oil demand (million tonnes) 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.0 ` 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Share from cassava Share from sugarcane molasses Palm-oil Cassava will provide 80% of the feedstock from 2018 onwards Cassava demand for bioethanol will have eight-fold increase Palm oil demand will increase by 108% between 2010 and 2030

3.3 Demand for sugarcane and cassava will increase Production (million tonnes) and yield (tonnes/ha) 100 80 60 40 20 Crop production for feedstock in biofuel production Sugarcane Cassva 0 0.0 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 2011 20211961 1971 1981 1991 2001 2011 2021 Production Area Yield 2.0 1.6 1.2 0.8 0.4 Area (million ha) 100 Production (Million tonnes) and yield (tonnes/ha) 80 60 40 20 Oil palm in Malaysia 0 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 4.0 3.2 2.4 1.6 Area (Million ha) 0.8 0.0 Yield is the main growth driver of production increase of sugarcane and cassava Area has been the major driver of production growth in oil palm

Depletion inside the area of productio n 3.4 Components of Water footprints Total water footprints Water embedde d in other inputs Internal water footprints External water footprints Soil moisture Effective rainfall Irrigation Polluted water Direct water use Indirect water use

3.5. Water depletion in the process of ethanol production Consumptive water use Water pollution Agriculture Industrial Industrial

Sugarcane/cassava in Thailand 3.6.. Factors of water footprints Thailand Malaysia Factors Sugarcane Cassava Oil palm Area (1000Mha) 1,047 1,050 4,235 % irrigated area 14% 0% 0% Yield (tonne/ha) 51.467 22.073 19.289 ETa (mm) 1,183 847 1,383 Effective rainfall (P75) (mm) 675 678 1,234

4.1. Water footprint estimates Water footprints (m 3 /tonne) 4,000 3,200 2,400 1,600 800-14 12 6 16 177 3,718 3,261 2,288 32 1,469 131 290 307 Sugarcane Molasses Bioethanol Cassava Bioethanol 640 Oil palm Palm oil Sugarcane bioethanol Cassava bioethanol Palm oil biodiesel Biodiesel Rainfall contribution 89% in molasses ethanol 99% in cassava ethanol 99% in palm oil biodiesel Thailand Malaysia Effective rainfall Irrigation Sugarcane ethanol: 1,299 liters of water/ liter of ethanol Cassava ethanol: 1,817 liters of water/ liter of ethanol Palm oil biodiesel: 3,222 liters of water / liter of biodiesel

4. Total Water footprints and Impacts 4.2 Contribution from irrigation to total water footprints is low 784 and 15 mcm/year for sugarcane and cassava ethanol in Thailand 7.1 mcm/year for biodiesel in Malaysia Water use for meeting cassava bioethanol demand will increase rapidly, but most of that will be from rainfall contribution Water footprints (m 3 /year) 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000-2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Sugarcane ethanol 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Cassava 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Bioethanol demand (Million liters/year) Green water footprints Irrigation water footprints Bioethanol demand

4. Total water footprints and Impacts 4.3. Large spatial variation of water footprints 4 provinces share more than 75% of irrigation WFP

4. Total water footprints and Impacts 4.4 Irrigation water footprints is a small portion of renewable water supply Irrigation demand for bioethanol production in 2022 is only 0.2% of the renewable water supply of 444 billion m 3 in Thailand Irrigation demand for biodiesel production in 2022 is only 0.003% of the renewable water supply of 630 billion m3 in Malaysia Water footprints (m 3 /year) 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000-2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Sugarcane ethanol 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Cassava 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Bioethanol demand (Million liters/year) Green water footprints Irrigation water footprints Bioethanol demand

5. Issues and Concerns 5.1 The planned growth in 100 Planned sugarcane production growth 1.20 sugarcane yield for meeting bioethanol demand is unrealistic Envisaged that sugarcane yield to grow by 84% by 2012 But, 1% increase in irrigated area under sugarcane will increase yield by 0.16% (Figure below). At present 14% of the sugarcane area is irrigated. A difficult target to meet the planned growth even if all area is irrigated Production (million tonnes) and yield (tonnes/ha) Yield (ton/ha) 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 80 60 40 20 0 1998 2008 2018 Production Area Yield y = 0.56 x + 1.00 R 2 = 0.97 y = 49.557e 0.16x R 2 = 0.17 30 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 Irrigated area - % of total area 0.96 0.72 0.48 0.24 0.00 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Area (Million ha) NET - % of ETa Yield NET-% of ETa Expon. (Yield) Linear (NET-% of ETa)

5. Issues and Concerns 5.2. Cassava exports will drastically reduce Planned area under cassava will remain at the present level. But, envisaged growth of cassava yield is moderate. As a result, cassava exports will reduce drastically. Economic impacts of this needs further investigation 40 Cassava use (Milion MT) and ethanol production (Million Liters/day) 32 24 16 8 0 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 Cassava for ethanol Cassava export Cassava-food/feed demand Ethanol production

5. Issues and Concerns 5.3. Major impact is on water quality deterioration 5.3.1. Excessive fertilizer use can leach Nitrogen to groundwater Urea application can leach 8.69 million kg nitrogen to groundwater But, the groundwater recharge is significantly large with respect to water needs to dilute quality deterioration Sugarcane Cassava Fertilizer (kg/ha) N 90 90 P 60 50 K 110 60 Total 260 200 Fungicide (kg/ha) - 620 Insecticide (kg/ha) 60 - Herbicide (l/ha) 800 -

5. Issues and Concerns 5.3.2. Wastewater generation is a major quality issue Wastewater, called spent wash is stored in ponds and part of that is reapplied to fields as fertilizer Spent wash has high PH, high temperature, high nitrogen content Biological and chemical oxygen demand (BOD, COD). Spent was in ponds can deteriorate groundwater quality Spent wash fertilizer can enter streams or groundwater with return flows Total spent wash generated is low now, but can generate as much as 8 mcm by 2012. Too big amount to use as fertilizer, thus can have a major environmental concerns

6. Conclusion Biofuel production will not be major problem for irrigation water use in Thailand or in Malaysia. Most of the consumptive water use is from effective rainfall However, the quality of water resources with increasing effluents generated by the biofuel plants could be a major environmental bottleneck to guard against

Thank you