Thinking beyond the technology. How autonomous vehicles will change everything we know about cities

Similar documents
What is the Dakota County Principal Arterial Study?

CONNECTED AUTOMATION: DISRUPTIVE TRANSFORMATION. Jim Barbaresso HNTB Fellow and Senior Vice President Intelligent Transportation Systems

THE REGION S PLAN POLICY FRAMEWORK. August 2015

on Access Management Howard Preston CH2M HILL 7 th Annual Conference

Appendix C: Scenarios and Future Drivers Impacting Transportation

APA Policy Principles for Autonomous Vehicles

Autonomous vehicles. Preparing for the changing mobility ecosystem

Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

SUBURBAN EDGE COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE ALL COMMUNITIES SUBURBAN EDGE

2040 LAND USE WORKBOOK February 2017

MOBILITICS. Scenario Planning and Modeling Connected & Automated Vehicles. June 12, 2018

Land Use Planning and GHG Emissions of Urban Transport. Elizabeth Deakin Director, UC Transportation Center Professor of City and Regional Planning

12 Evaluation of Alternatives

Appendix D Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

8: Transportation Demand &

MEMORANDUM #4. DATE: November 4, Warrenton TSP Project Management Team. Ray Delahanty, AICP, DKS Associates Kate Petak, EIT, DKS Associates

2. Guiding Principles, Objectives, and Policies

Zoning Text Amendment

ALBION FLATS DEVELOPMENT EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS

This presentation is one of the support materials prepared for the capacity building program Building Leaders in Urban Transport Planning (LUTP).

Transit Works. Improving the quality of life for all Californians.

Summary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans

TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE. January 29, 2013

Kathleen Marie Lacey, Chief Comprehensive Planner Boise City Planning and Development Services Department. State Street Memorandum of Understanding

Congestion Management Strategy

Transportation and Land Use Planning Connectivity

Regional Travel Demand Management Plan

RURAL CENTER COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE RURAL CENTER ALL COMMUNITIES

Establishing a Regional Planning Framework for Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAV)

Transportation Problems and Issues Excerpts from WWW Links

Performance Measures Workshop, May 18, 2017

Lesson 2. Principles of. Transportation. Land Use 2-1

CHAPTER 4 FUTURE TRENDS

Appendix B. OKI 2030 Regional Transportation Plan Project Scoring Process. Ohio Kentucky Indiana Regional Council of Governments

Deploying autonomous vehicles Commercial considerations and urban mobility scenarios

wheaton s future Wheaton s Role in the County

Intelligent Transportation Systems

SOUTHEAST FLORIDA REGIONAL COMPACT CLIMATE CHANGE. Sustainable Communities & Transportation Planning

Preparing our Roadways for Connected and Automated Vehicles. 70th Annual Ohio Transportation Engineering Conference Bob Edelstein

Rivers Edge Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Traffic Study

The Three C s of Urban Transportation Planning

AMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA

Transportation and Utilities

ARC Freight Advisory Task Force Meeting. SOUTH FULTON COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Multi-Modal Study

January 17, Ron Waldthausen Platte Valley LLC 1378 Promontory Bluff View Colorado Springs, CO 80921

RTC Mobility Plan Workshop. North Central Texas Council of Governments July 9, 2015

ONE NEVADA TRANSPORTATION PLAN The Nevada Department of Transportation s Long-Range Transportation Plan

Rick Willson s new book, Parking Management for Smart Growth, is a how-to

North Woodbridge Urban Mixed Use Master Zoning Plan

Transportation Category. New Location and. Green Vehicles. Reduced Parking Footprint. Bicycle Facilities. Access to Quality Transit

DIVERSIFIED RURAL COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE DIVERSIFIED RURAL ALL COMMUNITIES

SCENARIO PLANNING 12

Final Report Basic Analysis (Phase A) Final Version 10/24/2017

THAT Council adopt the Congestion Management Strategy as outlined in this report

Draft Land Use, Scenario Planning, & Sustainability Technical Report. Summary

COMMON CARRIER LOCKER SYSTEMS: Phase 1 Research Project

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

TRANSPORTATION RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE PLAN AND COUNTY REGULATIONS VISION FOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ROAD NETWORK SECTION 7

Livability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update. RTPAC #1 January 18, 2018

Land Use and Traffic Congestion

Policy Brief. Three Transportation Revolutions: Synergies with Transit. Summary. Introduction

RURAL RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE RURAL RESIDENTIAL ALL COMMUNITIES

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Memphis MPO March 30, 2015

CANDIDATE QUESTIONNAIRE

Land Use, Scenario Planning, & Sustainability Technical Report. Summary

LUNDY S LANE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN STUDY

VISION STATEMENT, MISSION STATEMENT, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Article 12. Commercial Zoning Districts C-1, Central Business District. C-2, Limited Neighborhood Commercial District

Technical Assistance for Sustainable Communities: Building Blocks

2040 STRATEGIC PLAN. January we move people

Driverless Cars and the Costs of Sprawl. October 17-19, 2018

Transportation and Land Use

Creating Sustainable Neighborhoods

EMU: BN/UP ALTERNATIVE ARVADA RIDGE STATION OPTION A

CHAPTER 5. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Transportation Goals & Objectives

TRANSIT SERVICE GUIDELINES

Welcome to the Everett Transit Long Range Plan Visioning Workshop

LARKSPUR SMART STATION AREA PLAN. Public Workshop December 3, 2013

An External Review of Post-Development Phase of The Crest Ridge Corporate Center

PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICE OBJECTIVES AND STANDARDS

New Residential & Commercial Development

2018 Comprehensive Guide Plan Steering Committee. Wednesday, October 11, Minnehaha Room, Minnetonka City Hall. 6:00 8:00 p.m.

SECTION 7.0 Other CEQA Considerations

Highway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan. TAC August 2, 2017

APPENDIX A - PLANS AND POLICY REVIEW FEBRUARY 2017

To Market, To Market. Discussion Contents. Part 1: Land Use & Infrastructure

CHAPTER ONE a vision for tomorrow

Airports in the Region Case Study

Shaping our future. A summary of BC TRANSIT S STRATEGIC PLAN 2030

STAFF REPORT. Permit Number: Ryan. Kitsap County Board of Commissioners; Kitsap County Planning Commission

A NEW WAY OF BUILDING. Atkins response to A City For All Londoners

A Connected Multimodal Region

This document has been developed to provide context to the Board as part of the strategic planning process. Regional development and travel trends

Appendix F: Scenario Planning

Freight Work Group. May 1, :30 am 11:30 am

Chapter 14 Work Program

The Role of Transportation Systems Management & Operations in Supporting Livability and Sustainability

Building a Safety Case for Automated Mobility: Smart Cities and Autonomous Mobility Getting There Safely

John R. Williams, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director JRW Lance Calvert, Public Works Director/City Engineer LC

GUIDING PRINCIPLES MEMORANDUM

Transcription:

Thinking beyond the technology How autonomous vehicles will change everything we know about cities

/Who are we?/ +research team * This is a heading Rick Stein, AICP Founder, Principal Urban Decision Group Justin Robbins, AICP Senior Planner OHM Advisors Jason Sudy, AICP Principal / Senior Planner OHM Advisors Urban Mobility Research Center (UMRC)

/what your day will be like/ Do any of these people sound familiar?

/young and urban/ +AV tech context Image source: www.investopia.com

/young and urban/ +AV tech context * No car needed * Shared mobility service * Huge cost savings * Live anyplace * Mobility options make density even easier Image source: www..fiscaltimes.com

/suburban families/ +AV tech context

/suburban families/ +AV tech context * In the near term, may reduce cars per household * Two car to one * Better mobility for regular trips (work, school, etc.) * Large potential change in development patterns Image source: www..nbcnews.com

/older populations/ +AV tech context

/older populations/ +AV tech context * Many living options * Stay in existing house * Location not limited by mobility choices * Visit family and friends * Despite loss of vision or diminished physical mobility * Remain active * Mental and physical

/today s message/ We re nearing the end of a 70-year experiment

with a new era about to begin: *We need to be ready: * There will be winners and losers * Cities have a lots to gain * Must be prepared * Must embrace change * Autonomous Vehicle technology is part of a global shift toward automation

/biggest impacts/ You re already in trouble if

You have lots (pun intended) of retail * Typical suburban-style design * Over-parked * Large surface lots * Big Boxes and strip malls * High quantity of per capita retail * Sectors most sensitive to on-line sales competition Image credit: www.strongtowns.org

Job base with high automation factor Image source: www.starship.xyz Source: McKinsey Global Institute McKinsey Data: https://public.tableau.com/profile/mckinsey.analytics#!/vizhome/automationandusjobs/technicalpotentialforautomation McKinsey Article: http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/where-machines-could-replace-humans-and-where-they-cant-yet

Un-adaptable public investments Image source: http://www.meetusincolumbus.com

No worthy destinations or sense of place * Ease of access less vital * Many legacy businesses to become obsolete * Highway visibility far less important for many uses * Wanting to be at a destination will be more vital than all other factors

/current trends/ What is going on now?

/safety/ +AV tech context * 2014 32,675 deaths (US) * 2015 38,300 deaths (US) * 2016 40,000+ deaths (US * 94%+ caused by human error

/safety/ +AV tech context * Driving is not the priority anymore

/real-world implementation/ +AV tech context * Where have we seen this before? * Smartphone adoptions rates in US Source: http://www.asymco.com

/real-world implementation/ +AV tech context * This is a heading

/real-world implementation/ +AV tech context * Computing speed upgrades: * Intel chip 2014 * 37.5m transistors per square mm * Intel chip 2017 * 100m transistors per square mm Source: Intel Senior Fellow Mark Bohr interview comments * Will dramatically shrink the brain for AV Image source: www.phys.org

AV LEVEL 5 full autonomy /LEVEL 5 full autonomy/ Video View at link below: https://www.tesla.com/videos/autopilot-self-driving-hardware-neighborhood-long

/how it s all gonna change/ Fundamental impacts for land use, development, infrastructure and life as we know it.

/planning refresher/ What is the size of a parking space? 9x18, 10x20 +/- 200 s.f.

/planning refresher/ How many parking spaces can you get per acre of land? +/- 100 spaces

/planning refresher/ How many parking spaces would be needed for 1,000 square feet of retail? 3-4 spaces -or- 1,740 square feet

/planning refresher/ How many square feet in an acre? 43,560 square feet

/planning refresher/ Given one acre of land, how much retail can be developed? 10,000 square feet

What does this mean? Parking is THE #1 constraint for development in almost any context.

/development impacts/ +14 ac. site area 0% Autonomy 6.6ac Parking 135ks.f. Building Area

/development impacts/ +14 ac. site area 10% Autonomy 0.5ac. Unused 6.0ac. Parking

/development impacts/ +14 ac. site area 20% Autonomy 1.2ac. Unused 5.3ac. Parking

/development impacts/ +14 ac. site area 30% Autonomy 1.8ac. Unused 4.6ac. Parking

/development impacts/ +14 ac. site area 40% Autonomy 2.5ac. Unused 4.0ac. Parking

/development impacts/ +14 ac. site area 50% Autonomy 3.2ac. Unused 3.3ac. Parking

/development impacts/ +14 ac. site area 60% Autonomy 3.8ac. Unused 2.7ac. Parking

/development impacts/ +14 ac. site area 70% Autonomy 4.6ac. Unused 2.0ac. Parking

/development impacts/ +14 ac. site area 80% Autonomy 5.0ac. Unused 1.3ac. Parking

/development impacts/ +14 ac. site area 90% Autonomy 6.2ac. Unused 0.7ac. Parking 135ks.f. Building Area

/development impacts/ +14 ac. site area 95% Autonomy 222ks.f. Building Area

/development impacts/ +14 ac. site area 95% Autonomy 444ks.f. Building Area

/development impacts/ +14 ac. site area 95% Autonomy 740ks.f. Building Area

/development impacts/ +14 ac. site area 95+% Autonomy s.f. Building Area

/development impacts/ 350 acres Uses: * Office * Residential * Hotel * Restaurant * Theater +case study

/development impacts/ 350 acres Uses: * Office * Residential * Hotel * Restaurant * Theater +case study

/development impacts/ Roadway 14 acres 4% +case study

/development impacts/ Roadway 14 acres 4% BLDGs 31.5 acres 9% +case study

/development impacts/ Roadway 14 acres 4% BLDGs 31.5 acres 9% Greenspace 112 acres 32% +case study

/development impacts/ Roadway 14 acres 4% BLDGs 31.5 acres 9% Greenspace 112 acres 32% Parking 192 acres 55% +case study

/case studies/ Locational characteristics that drive change

* Franklin County, OH * Residential vulnerability +case study

* Franklin County, OH * Residential most vulnerable +case study

* Franklin County, OH * Example area +case study

* Franklin County, OH * Example area +case study

* Franklin County, OH * Commercial vulnerability +case study

* Franklin County, OH * Commercial most vulnerable +case study

* Franklin County, OH * Example +case study

* Franklin County, OH * Example +case study

* Atlanta Region, GA * Residential Vulnerability +case study

* Atlanta Region, GA * Residential most Vulnerable +case study

* Atlanta Region, GA * Example +case study

* Atlanta Region, GA * Example +case study

* Atlanta Region, GA * Commercial Vulnerability +case study

* Atlanta Region, GA * Commercial most Vulnerable +case study

* Atlanta Region, GA * Example +case study

* Atlanta Region, GA * Example +case study

/more questions/ What else is going to happen?

What will cars look like? The form of today s car is not importanti Image source: http://www.automobilemag.com/news/urban-mobility/ *What will cars look like? * Vehicles will transform * Focus on mobility * Smaller for efficiency * Various shared vehicle forms * Many factors of today s cars will not be needed * Crash safety aspects * Aspects related to ICE tech

*What will cars look like? * Vehicles will transform * Focus on mobility * Smaller for efficiency * Various shared vehicle forms Image source: https://localmotors.com/ * Many factors of today s cars will not be needed * Crash safety aspects * Aspects related to ICE tech

Reduction of Trips Video View at link below: MIT New York Cab Research: https://www.csail.mit.edu/ridesharing_reduces_traffic_300_percent MIT New York Cab Paper: http://www.pnas.org/content/114/3/462.abstract Source: xxxxxx

*Will we own our own cars in the future? * Strong incentives toward shared model * Per mile cost * Liability * Urban opportunities Source: Barclays Research Insights on Disruptive Mobility (2015) Barclays Bank PLC

*Will we own our own cars in the future? * Strong incentives toward shared model * Per mile cost * Liability * Urban opportunities * Transition to shared model may be more rapid than previously expected Rethink X Report: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/585c3439be65942f022bbf9b/t/5912307e725e25a34efe5497/14 94364316456/RethinkX+Report_050917+%281%29.pdf

*What happens with trucking? * Truck platooning * Controlled by front vehicle * Reduced fuel and labor costs * Safety increases Image source: Volvo * Testing already underway throughout US and worldwide

Image source: http://peloton-tech.com/

Big questions: *What about sprawl? * Will AV adoption encourage sprawl? * How does AV tech change individual location decisions? * Where will people decide to live? * Where will developers decide to build? * How/where do changes in density happen in each metro? Image source: www.inhabitat.com

Big questions: *Will traffic get better or worse? * Two schools of thought: * Better access will drive more trips * More ride sharing will lessen overall trips Image source: www.atlanta.curbed.com

Intersection Improvements Video View at link below: MIT Intersection Paper: http://senseable.mit.edu/papers/pdf/20160316_tachet_etal_revisitingstreet_plos.pdf MIT Intersection Overview: http://senseable.mit.edu/light-traffic/

Big questions: *What about bikers and pedestrians? * Planners have need to help the conversation * Safe street crossings * Cyclist interactions * Signalization and systemwide automation Image source:: www.idahostatesman.com

Big questions: *What about transit? * How will different transit types interact? * Will routes still exist for buses? * A total shift to on-demand? * How will the vehicles transform? * How can all populations be served? Image source:: www.mic.com

Big questions: *What else might change in our neighborhoods? * Will our Main Streets get better? * No longer constrained by parking * Urban form and uses take precedence Image source:: www.mic.com Side Street Planning * What if on-street parking goes away? Do cul-de-sacs make any sense?

Big questions: *What else might change in our neighborhoods? * Will our Main Streets get better? * No longer constrained by parking * Urban form and uses take precedence Image source: http://www.statecollegepa.us/2502/allen-street-rain-gardens Image source:: www.mic.com * What if on-street parking goes away? Do cul-de-sacs make any sense?

/what you must do/ Planners and planning must begin today

What to expect: 1-3 years 3-7 years 7-15 years 15+ years Driverless Car Adoption Limited adoption Higher cost vehicles Regulations evolving Limited supporting infrastructure Moderate adoption Average cost vehicles Shared model emerging Added infrastructure High adoption Vehicle fleet replacing Shared model dominant Infrastructure updates Full adoption All vehicles sold Regulations set Integrated systems Site Design Impacts Low Most vehicles userdriven Parking needs remain similar Site and building access remain similar Moderate Most vehicles userdriven Parking needs reduced Site and building access needed modifications High Most vehicles autonomous Parking needs drop significantly Site and building access major modifications Immense All vehicles autonomous Parking needs near zero Site and building fundamentally changed

What planners must do (now!): * Include AV technology in planning processes: * Comprehensive/master/strategic plan processes * Mandate code changes: * Require that all parking garages be adaptable to other uses * Adequate floor-to-ceiling heights * No ramped floorplates * Reduce parking requirements * Anticipate triggers in AV adoption to lower and/or abandon parking minimums * Focus on place * The impact on commercial development will be felt the earliest

What planners must do (now!): * Create overlays * Corridors with never gonna leave uses like car lots, gas stations, etc.. * THEY ARE GOING TO BE OBSOLETE * Requirements and strategies for redevelopment of corner lots * Advocate to your elected boards and fellow staff * Provide information to City Council, Planning Commission * Advocate city engineering and transportation to consider coming AV

What planners must do soon (2-3 years): * Identify areas of your community most susceptible to change * New opportunities for success * Potential areas for failure * Define new land use strategy for your community * What to do with excess retail ground * What to do with excess parking areas * What to do with excess corner lots

/questions?/ +research team * This is a heading Rick Stein, AICP Founder, Principal Urban Decision Group rstein@urbandecisiongroup.com Justin Robbins, AICP Senior Planner OHM Advisors justin.robbins@ohm-advisors.com Jason Sudy, AICP Principal / Senior Planner OHM Advisors jason.sudy@ohm-advisors.com Urban Mobility Research Center (UMRC)