Protecting Utah s Water Resources. Nutrient Issues

Similar documents
Jordan River Total Maximum Daily Load Study. Presented By: James Harris Utah Division of Water Quality

Jordan River TMDL Update

Acidity and Alkalinity:

Jordan River TMDL Study What Have We Learned So Far?

2/11/16. Materials in ecosystems are constantly reused Three cycles: The Carbon Cycle The Nitrogen Cycle The Phosphorus Cycle

Objectives: Define the term biogeochemical cycles. Compare and contrast how carbon, phosphorus, nitrogen, and water cycle through the environment.

Jordan River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Phase 1

If your die reads: 3, 4 or 5 Nitrogen gas (N 2 ) is extracted from the air by humans.

The Biosphere and Biogeochemical Cycles

Environmental Services

Nutrient Cycling and Water Quality on California Rangelands

Draft Wasteload Allocation Report For McCurtain County Rural Water District #5

EUTROPHICATION. Student Lab Workbook

Environmental Services

CYCLES OF MATTER NATURAL WORLD

Swim At Your Own Risk! E.coli Impaired Recreational Waters in Salt Lake County: Jordan, Parley's and Emigration

Jordan River Basin. Planning for the Future. Salt Lake County Watershed Symposium (August 11, 2011) Todd Stonely Utah Division of Water Resources

Draft Wasteload Allocation Report Town of Haworth

Ellen Bailey. UWW Educator training January 13,

Draft Wasteload Allocation Report For Logan County Rural Water District #1

MLA Header: coal oil natural gas burning of fossil fuels volcanoes photosynthesis respiration ocean sugar greenhouse decayed

Lesson Overview. Cycles of Matter. Lesson Overview. 3.4 Cycles of Matter

Ecosystems: Nutrient Cycles

Cycles of Ma,er. Lesson Overview. Lesson Overview. 3.4 Cycles of Matter

Redwood Shores Lagoon November 2016 Monthly Water Quality Monitoring Report

Redwood Shores Lagoon February 2019 Monthly Water Quality Monitoring Report

The Snapshot CONODOGUINET CREEK WATERSHED SNAPSHOT

Unit 3: Ecology II Section 1: Environmental Systems and Nutrient Cycling

2018 WATER QUALITY MONITORING BLUE MARSH RESERVOIR LEESPORT, PENNSYLVANIA

Water Quality Assessment in the Thames River Watershed

Redwood Shores Lagoon May 2017 Monthly Water Quality Monitoring Report

How Ecosystems Work Section 2. Chapter 5 How Ecosystems Work Section 2: Cycling of Materials DAY 1

Biogeochemical cycles

We share the Earth. Ecology & Environmental Issues

Chapter Two: Cycles of Matter (pages 32-65)

Nutrient Cycling in an Aquatic Ecosystem

Managing Excessive Algal Caused Oxygen Demand in the San Joaquin River Deep Water Ship Channel 1

3 3 Cycles of Matter

Wisconsin River. Hardest Working River In the Nation

2012 Nutrient Regulations Update

10/17/ Cycles of Matter. Recycling in the Biosphere. How does matter move among the living and nonliving parts of an ecosystem?

BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES

Biology. Slide 1 of 33. End Show. Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall

Sample Point Description Effluent Influent Influent Influent Influent

Ecology Ecology is the study of interactions between organisms and their environment.

How Ecosystems Work Section 2

CHEMICAL: NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS (read pp in Dodson)

Cooperative Monitoring Program nutrient monitoring results

UNIT 1 SUSTAINING ECOSYSTEMS

Salt Lake County Watershed Water Quality Model

Nutrients, Algal Blooms and Red Tides in Hong Kong Waters. Paul J. Harrison and Jie XU

Biology. Slide 1 of 33. End Show. Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall

DEMONSTRATING THE POLLUTANT LOADING FROM STORMWATER DISCHARGE TO AN URBAN RIVER IN THE INTERMOUNTAIN WEST USING HIGH-FREQUENCY DATA

To diagram the nitrogen cycle and provide examples of human actions that affect this cycle.

Why Water Quality? FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 26, 2013

Little Bay Water Quality Report Card Spring 2014

Santa Rosa Creek Water Quality Results 2004

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2014

The rest of this article describes four biogeochemical cycles: the water cycle, carbon cycle, nitrogen cycle, and phosphorous cycle.

Water Quality Indicators

Tina Laidlaw US EPA 1

Section 2: The Cycling of Materials

KENTUCKY S NUTRIENT STRATEGY Identification and Discussion of Potential Impacts

The Biosphere Chapter 3. What Is Ecology? Section 3-1

Cycles of Matter. Slide 1 of 33. End Show. Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall

Status of Water Quality in Ohio: The 2018 Integrated Report. April 25, 2018

Central Case: The Gulf of Mexico s Dead Zone

3 3 Cycles of Matter Slide 1 of 33

Analyses for geochemical investigations traditionally report concentrations as weight per volume of the measured ions (mg/l of NO 3 , NO 2

Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Peyzaj Mimarlığı Bölümü. PM 317 Human and Environment Assoc. Prof. Dr. Salih GÜCEL

Irrigation. Branch. Crowfoot Creek Watershed Study. Why was this study conducted? How was this study conducted?

The Cycling of Matter

Sustaining Colorado s Watersheds: Making the Water Quality Connections October 2-4, 2007

Phosphorus in the. Minnesota River

Redwood Shores Lagoon August Monthly Water Quality Monitoring Report

10/18/2010 THINK ABOUT IT CHAPTER 3 THE BIOSHPERE RECYCLING IN THE BIOSPHERE RECYCLING IN THE BIOSPHERE

Ecosystems. Trophic relationships determine the routes of energy flow and chemical cycling in ecosystems.

Lake of the Pines. Watershed TMDL. Depressed DO conditions in 3,700 acres of upper reservoir; declining

NC Ambient Lake Assessment Program Overview including Coastal Lakes

Utah s (d) List of Impaired Waters

Lesson 2.4 Biogeochemical Cycles

OWEA Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Upgrading WRFs for Biological Nutrient Removal. June 25, 2015

THE CYCLING OF NUTRIENTS

The Myakka River. Presented to the Myakka River Management Coordinating Council January 9, 2009

Water Chemistry. Water 101

CLMP+ Report on Fleming Lake (Aitkin County)

OPTION C.6 NITROGEN & PHOSPHORUS CYCLES

Continuous records for the Chariton River indicate that 2004 was an average water year, with total flow approximately equal to the average annual

Biogeochemical Cycles

Watershed - Lake Model to Support TMDL Determinations for Lake Thunderbird

Cooperative Monitoring Program

EQ: How are nutrients recycled throughout the environment?

McKenzie Watershed Water Quality Discussion Article

Hydrology: Sources of Water and Nutrients

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2018

The photographs show three species of lichen. Each species can tolerate different concentrations of pollutants present in the air.

Urban Geology Spring 2011

Decision Rationale. Total Maximum Daily Load for Phosphorus for the Sassafras River, Cecil and Kent Counties, Maryland 4/1/2002

Performance Evaluation of the Moores Creek Advanced Water Resource Recovery Facility

Evaluation of Water Quality in. Sylvia Heaton Water Bureau, MDNRE

Transcription:

Protecting Utah s Water Resources Nutrient Issues

Nutrient Issues Questions What are they? Why are they important? Nationally Locally What are the impact on my community Costs Timing

What are Nutrients? Chemical elements/compounds needed by organisms to survive, grow, and reproduce. Carbon 25-40% dry weight found in everything natural fixation decomposition Nitrogen 1-5% dry weight found in proteins nitrate (NO 3- ) ammonium (NH 4+ ) natural fixation decomposition Phosphorus 0.1-1% dry weight found in lipids, DNA phosphate (PO 3-4 ) mineral weathering decomposition Measured ratio of C:N:P can indicate organisms needs (106:16:1) Slide courtesy Dr. Michelle A. Baker - USU

Where are Most of the Nutrients? Nitrogen Phosphorus Atmosphere 79.6% 0.000005% Lithosphere 20.4% 7.3% Soils 0.006% 61.1% Ocean (dissolved) 0.002% 30.5% Terrestrial biomass 0.00007% 0.032% Ocean biomass 0.00001% 0.99% data from Schlesinger 1997 Key point: Most are NOT biologically available Slide courtesy Dr. Michelle A. Baker - USU

Nutrients of Concern Nitrogen & Phosphorus

Green Lawns - OK!

Green Lakes NO WAY!

Impacted waters A National Issue Fisheries Recreation Drinking Water Supply

Impacts of Decaying Plant and Algal Matter on Dissolved Oxygen Algal growth stimulated by Nitrogen/Phosphorus High DO during day Dead algae falls to bottom Low DO (Hypoxia) Decaying matter depletes dissolved oxygen near bottom of water body

Numeric Standards State by State National Trends

Numeric Standards

States in 1998

States in 2008

But That Won t Apply in Utah

Utah Standards Standards for Ammonia ph Dependent for Fisheries Pollution Indicators BOD 5 Nitrate as N 4 Total Phosphorus as P 0.05 Investigations should be conducted to develop more information where these pollution indicator levels are exceeded. Total Phosphorus as P indicator for lakes and reservoirs shall be 0.025.

Montana Criteria

Utah Permits EAST CANYON CREEK WRF Current Permit Issued April 30,2007 Parameter Max Monthly Max Weekly Max Daily Yearly Total 90-day Mean CBOD 12 17 Ammonia Spring 7.3 13.3 Summer 4.3 10.7 Fall 12.0 20.5 Winter 8.2 15.1 Total Phosphorus Summer 0.1 Yearly 1492

Utah s Puzzle

DWQ State Study Last year through the engineering firm CH 2 M Hill DWQ begin evaluating the economic impacts of establishing state-wide discharge standards for nitrogen and phosphorus. In partnership with existing facilities, costs estimates were developed for implementing nutrient removal at differing levels

Basis of State Study Four Effluent Scenarios Total Phosphorus Only Total Phosphorus & Total Nitrogen 1.0 ppm 1.0 ppm & 20 ppm 0.1 ppm 0.1 ppm & 10 ppm

Utah s 30 Mechanical Plants

Results Statewide of the Study Four Effluent Scenarios 30 Mechanical Plants Costs Total Phosphorus Only Total Phosphorus & Total Nitrogen 1.0 ppm 1.0 ppm & 20 ppm Capital 23.7 M 139.7 M O&M 4.5 M / year 4.7 M / year Rate $ 1.19 / month $ 2.99 / month

Results Statewide of the Study Four Effluent Scenarios 30 Mechanical Plants Costs Total Phosphorus Only Total Phosphorus & Total Nitrogen 0.1 ppm 0.1 ppm & 10 ppm Capital 818.1 M 1,040.1 M O&M 4.8 M 5.0 M Rate $ 11.08 / month $ 13.58 / month

So What Could this Mean to? Salt Lake County

2008 303(d) Report to Congress

2008 303(d) Report to Congress Watershed Assessment Assessment Beneficial Beneficial Management Unit Unit Use Use Stream Unit Name Name Class Support Pollutant Miles Jordan River/ Utah Lake Jordan River-1 Jordan River from Farmington Bay upstream contiguous with the Davis County line. 3B NS Dissolved Oxygen 7.6 Jordan River/ Utah Lake Jordan River-2 Jordan River from Davis County line upstream to North Temple Street. 3B NS Dissolved Oxygen 4.46 Jordan River/ Utah Lake Jordan River-3 Jordan River from North Temple to 2100 S 2B NS Dissolved Oxygen 4.2 Jordan River/ Utah Lake Jordan River-3 Jordan River from North Temple to 2100 S 3B NS Total Phosphorus 4.2

Salt Lake City Magna Central Valley South Valley Jordan Basin

Four Effluent Scenarios Salt Lake County Plants (4) 4 plants currently operating 1 under construction Central Valley WRF South Valley WRF Salt Lake City WRF Jordan Basin WRF Magna WID - 75 MGD - 58 MGD - 56 MGD - 15 MGD - 6.6 MGD 210 MGD

Four Effluent Scenarios Salt Lake County Plants (4) Phosphorus = 1 mg/l Reduce Phosphorus Load by 1.42 tons per day Reduce Nitrogen Load by 0 tons per day Capital Costs $6.40 M Additional Annual O&M Costs $1.05 M Increase Cost per ERU $0.38 per month ($1.99)

Four Effluent Scenarios Salt Lake County Plants (4) Phosphorus = 1 mg/l, Nitrogen = 20 mg/l Reduce Phosphorus Load by 1.42 tons per day Reduce Nitrogen Load by 4.14 tons per day Capital Costs $56.42 M Additional Annual O&M Costs $1.58 M Increase Cost per ERU $1.48 per month ($2.99)

Four Effluent Scenarios Salt Lake County Plants (4) Phosphorus = 0.1 mg/l Reduce Phosphorus Load by 1.99 tons per day Reduce Nitrogen Load by 0 tons per day Capital Costs $296.44 M Additional Annual O&M Costs $5.70 M Increase Cost per ERU $7.16 per month ($11.08)

Four Effluent Scenarios Salt Lake County Plants (4) Phosphorus = 0.1 mg/l, Nitrogen = 10 mg/l Reduce Phosphorus Load by 1.99 tons per day Reduce Nitrogen Load by 10.41tons per day Capital Costs $380.89 M Additional Annual O&M Costs $7.15 M Increase Cost per ERU $9.16 per month ($13.58)

Questions?