Figure 1.1. Scheme of the Syrdarya basin.

Similar documents
1.2. Status of Water and Energy Complex of the Kazakhstan Part of the Syrdarya Basin, V. Borisovsky

Aral Sea Basin. Surface Water Availability Average Year. Water Balance Average flow to sea ~60 km³. Drought Year

The major principles of joint transboundary water resources use are the following:

CE397 Transboundary Water Resources

INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE ARAL SEA BASIN

Formation of market relation in water economy complex of Tajikistan and the Central Asia Inom Normatov

INAGAKI Fumiaki. Assistant Professor, Graduate School of Media and Governance Keio University, Japan

Environmental Policy and Technology Project

Use of water and energy resources in Central Asia

CONTENTS. Interstate Coordination Water Commission of Central Asia April 1998

Strengthening the Institutional and Legal Frameworks of the International Fund for Saving the Aral Sea: Review and Proposals.

Cooperative Game Theory for Transboundary River Basins: The Syr Darya Basin

STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS REPORT

Draft assessment of the water-food-energy-ecosystems nexus in the Syr Darya

INTEGRATED RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT IN UZBEKISTAN: DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES

The water balance and the solution of water problems in the central Asian region

STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS REPORT

National Policy Dialogue on Integrated Water Resources Management in Tajikistan under the EU Water Initiative

IWRM as an Instrument for Improving Water Security in Central Asia. Vadim Sokolov

Central Asia and the Aral Sea Basin

SCADA APPLICATION IN CENTRAL ASIA ABSTRACT

Global Water Partnership Central Asia and Caucasus (GWP CACENA)

SECTOR ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY): ENERGY

The Process of Preparing a National IWRM and Water Efficiency Plan for Kazakhstan. By Tim Hannan UNDP

4 - INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT TO COMBAT DESERTIFICATION. APPLICATION TO FERGANA VALLEY

Water in Central Asia. International partnership for better water cooperation and management in Central Asia

Water and Climate Change in Central Asia

The possibility of using the results of student research works for development projects in Central Asia. Ludmilla Kiktenko

Rational and Efficient Use of Water and Energy Resources in Central Asia

Analytical Tools for Decision Support by the Example of the Chu-Talas Basin. Ye.Sakhvaeva, Kyrgyzstan Bishkek September 2016

Re-examining conflict and cooperation in Central Asia: a case study from the Isfara River, Ferghana Valley

IWRM Principles Implementation in the Countries of Central Asia and Caucasus

REGIONAL ELECTRICITY EXPORT POTENTIAL STUDY

Environmental Policy and Technology Project

Presentation by Panel of Experts based on Environmental and Social Screening Report Almaty 6-7 November 2012

"Water Users' Associations in Central Asia: Opportunities and challenges for development" Content

II. DIAGNOSTIC REPORT ON WATER RESOURCES IN CENTRAL ASIA

Environmental and Social Impact Assessment for Rogun Hydro Power Plant

THE REPORT ON THE COUNTRY

Short Summary of CASEP and its Main Achievements during the past three years

The role of international conventions in ensuring. environmental security in Uzbekistan

RSRNAS 2 Design Decision Estimation

December Interstate Coordination Water Commission of Central Asia CONTENTS

GEF AGENCY of the IFAS ARAL SEA BASIN PROGRAM. Sub-component A1 REGIONAL REPORT NO. 3

The Costs of Benefit Sharing: Historical and Institutional Analysis of Shared Water Development in the Ferghana Valley, the Syr Darya Basin

SECTOR ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY): ENERGY. 1. Sector Background, Performance, Problems, and Opportunities

REGIONAL CENTRE OF HYDROLOGY IN CENTRAL ASIA

UZBEKISTAN Country report. Presented By Nurmatov Pakhlavon JSC Uzbekgidroenergo 4 th June 2018

CENTRAL ASIAN COUNTRIES INITIATIVE FOR LAND MANAGEMENT (CACILM) PROGRESS OF CACILM IMPLEMENTATION

World Bank. Key Issues for Consideration on the Proposed Rogun Hydropower Project

THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN NATIONAL REPORT

LESSONS ON COOPERATION BUILDING TO MANAGE WATER CONFLICTS IN THE ARAL SEA BASIN

Regional Workshop on Capacity-Building in Governance and Public Administration for Sustainable Development

Optimal Rates of Adopting Water Conservation Measures in the Aral Sea Basin

Review of the scientific network and the competition among MA students. Anna Inozemtseva Water Initiatives Support Program Manager

LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE INDEX 2010: CENTRAL ASIA Kazkhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan

Climate change and food security in Central Asia

XI. The Power of Water in a Divided Central Asia

Global Water Partnership Central Asia and Caucasus (GWP CACENA)

Electricity. It s essential for modern life. Without it, development is delayed and poverty endures.

Transboundary Regimes: The Amudarya Insights of NeWater

The Role of Donors in Addressing Water Problems in Central ASIA

Principal Investigator : Oyture Anarbekov Principal Investigator from USA: James Ayars USDA Principal Investigator from USA: Kate Berry, UNR

SECTOR ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY): ENERGY

Global Water Partnership Central Asia and Caucasus (GWP CACENA)

Chapter 2. WATER A CRITICAL RESOURCE FOR UZBEKISTAN

Water Management: A Critical Environmental Challenge in Central Asia. Peter Thomson World Bank

CENTRAL ASIA CROSS BORDER WATER MANAGEMENT EXCHANGE VISIT TO THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA

CONTENTS AGENDA OF THE BOARD OF INTERNATIONAL FUND OF ARAL SEA SAVING MEETING 3

Overview of Existing River Basins in Uzbekistan and the Selection of Pilot Basins

Kyrgyzstan. Geography, climate and population Geography. Climate. Population

Water and Food Security in Central Asia

Prepared by: Diana Castillo, Lisa Marie Izquierdo, Gloria Jimenez, Mari Stangerhaugen, Robert Nixon. Advisor: Ambassador Rafat Mahdi

World Bank Team s response to the concerns of Uzbek Experts communicated through the Ministry of Economy

REGIONAL SCOPING WORKSHOP ON THE USE OF IRRIGATION SYSTEMS FOR FISH PRODUCTION IN CENTRAL ASIA

Types and hydrogeologic features of surface and groundwater interactions in Uzbekistan

Central Asian Seed Association

Climate change and impacts on hydrometeorological processes, agro-climatic and water resources

Spatial and Temporal Variability of Water Productivity in the Syr Darya Basin, Central Asia. Abstract. Water Resources Research, 2004

Challenges for Land Use Functions in Central Asia

-to ensure efficient work of Commission for Social and Economic Development, Scientific, Technical and Ecological cooperation.

Bilateral and Multilateral Cooperation on Trans- boundary. in Central Asia: the Way Forward Following the Sixth World Water Forum.

World Bank Draft for Discussion. Key Issues for Consideration on the Proposed Rogun Hydropower Project

Republic of Uzbekistan: Water Resources Management Sector Project (Financed by the Japan Special Fund)

International Fund for Saving the Aral Sea

TECHNICAL REGULATION SYSTEM OF EURASIAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY AND CUSTOMS UNION

Transformations and current trends of water governance in Central Asia

ANNEX II: TERMS OF REFERENCE. Water Governance in Central Asia

List of hydropower stations in the Republic of Tajikistan

Technical Assistance Subproject Report

DEVELOPMENT OF THE RENEWABLE ENERGY IN KAZAKHSTAN - THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK OVERVIEW

Institutional Reforms at Main Canal Level and Their Water Allocation and Yield Impacts : A Case from South Ferghana Canal, Uzbekistan

Financial mechanism for sustainable water management in irrigated agriculture of Uzbekistan

Non-Governmental Organizations and Development: The Concept of Place and Space

Eurasian Economic Union and Silk Road Economic Belt: is it really a win-win cooperation? The case of Central Asia

Role and tasks of the State Rescuer s Training Center of MES KR SPEAKER: HEAD OF SRTC MES KR LIEUTENANT COLONEL AHMATOV K.M.

WATER AND FOOD SECURITY IN CENTRAL ASIA

GFDRR on Hydromet US$30. $2 billion

Central Asia. Enhancing Regional Power Trade in Central Asia. Public Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized

Problems of Sustainable Use and Management of Water and Land Resources in Uzbekistan

Transcription:

INTRODUCTION Joint use of water resources in the Aral Sea basin is one of key problems in interrelations between Central Asian countries. This problem is especially acute in the Syrdarya basin (see Figure 1), where flow regulation amounts to 93 %, and all water resources are utilized. With long-term average river flow of 37.5 cu km (in recent years the flow was 34 cu km, which has led to a gradual depletion of reservoir storage). Up to 52 cu km of water are used in the basin, indicating that almost 50% reuse of water resources takes place. The major water consumer in the basin is irrigated agriculture, and the major water users are hydroelectric power plants (HPPs). In the region, all reservoirs of both long-term and seasonal regulation have HPPs. In addition, many HPPs are located on diversion canals and minor watercourses. Previously, within the united state of the USSR, regulation of water use in all sectors of the economy (especially regulation of water use for irrigation and electric power generation) was centralized; formation of independent countries in Central Asia made these issues more complicated. National interests joined the already arisen regional problem, the crisis of the Aral Sea and Pre-Aral zone. Consequently, these problems have disrupted the coordinated operation the Naryn-Syrdarya Cascade of reservoirs from the previous single schedule and orientation primarily for water supply to irrigated areas of the basin. At present, to settle interstate water and energy relations in the region, a series of organizations of different levels has been established. These are the Central Asian Economic Community (CAEC), the Interstate Coordination Water Commission (ICWC), the Energy Council of Central Asian countries, etc. These institutions play an important role in solving current and long-range problems. For example, in 1992, within the ICWC an agreement on joint water use in the Aral Sea basin was concluded. This agreement made a considerable contribution in establishing water relations in the region. However, the following high water years smoothed many acute problems of interrelations, but once low water years (1995 and 1997) came, problems were exacerbated and many provisions of the agreement were no longer in force and ceased being applied. Under these circumstances, the need for a new agreement on a higher level became more apparent. Such an agreement was developed under the aegis of the Executive Committee (EC) of the CAEC with financial and technical assistance of USAID. On March 17, 1998, Prime Ministers of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, and the Republic of Uzbekistan signed the agreement on the use of water and energy resources of the Syrdarya basin between governments of these countries. Later (in 1999), the Republic of Tajikistan joined this agreement. This agreement provides for mutual supplies of electric power, fuel and energy resources to settle water and energy relations between the basin countries. The agreement also defines areas of future joint activities concerning rational use of water, fuel and energy resources in the region. Concurrent with the Syrdarya agreement, the countries signed an agreement on the parallel operation of the energy systems of Central Asia, the agreement on cooperation in the area of environment and rational nature use, and other interstate acts. These agreements complement each other and open up opportunities for closer cooperation. 1

R. Karadarya Rep. Kazakhstan Aral Sea Rep. Uzbekistan R. Syrdarya Toktogul Res. Andijan Res. 2 South Golodnaya Steppe Canal Arnasai Depression Canal R. Syrdarya R. Naryn New Boz Canal R. Chirchik Кизилкумский к-л Parkent Canal Keles Canal Rep. Kazakhstan Chardara Res. Legend Republic Boundary Canal Hydro-Station National Station Hydro-Power Plant Dostlik Kyrgyz Rep. Rep. Uzbekistan Rep. Tajikistan CFK Kairakum Ras. BFK Figure 1.1. Scheme of the Syrdarya basin. Charvak Res.

It became apparent that the Syrdarya water and energy agreement, being a framework agreement, required implementation mechanisms. The meetings of the Water and Energy Uses Round Table under the EC CAEC of July 20-25, 1998 and August 10-14, 1999 addressed these issues. At these meetings heads of water and energy sectors and representatives of governmental agencies of the countries participating in the agreement took part. The meeting participants noted the importance of developing a model to optimize operation modes for the major reservoirs of the Syrdarya basin that form the Naryn-Syrdarya Cascade. The participants of the 1998 Round Table included this work in the action plan and applied to USAID for support in solving this problem. Thereupon, the USAID Environmental Policies and Institutions for Central Asia (EPIC) Program initiated development of a model to optimize operation modes of major reservoirs of the Naryn-Syrdarya Cascade. The Round Table requested the five Central Asian governments and the regional organizations to appoint a group of specialists (the Working Group on Modeling) from the water and energy sectors of their countries and organizations to participate in the model development work. The main organizations for water management participating in the work included the Ministries comprising the ICWC from the riparian countries (Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and Kazakhstan), the Basin Management Organization of the Syrdarya river (BVO Syrdarya), and the Scientific Information Center (SIC) of the ICWC. The energy management organizations participating in the work included the Ministries comprising the Energy Council of Central Asia and the Unified Dispatch Center for Energy (UDC Energia). A group of about 25 specialists (both policy and technical level) was identified through this process. This Working Group was split into a policy level group (the Coordination Group; see Appendix 4 for a list of the members) to oversee and direct the work and a technical level group (the Technical Group; see Appendix 5 for a list of the members) to carry out the actual programming and testing of computer models. The Coordination Group decided that the primary objective of the work was to develop model components that are useful for the regional cooperation of the riparian countries of the Syrdarya basin and to the organizations carrying out the day-to-day work of implementing the 1998 Syrdarya agreement, that is, BVO Syrdarya and UDC Energia. The decision was made to concentrate on developing models of the river and energy systems as the primary goal. The need to develop a model of the use of water in irrigation (the so called Planning Zone model) was also agreed, but it was given lower priority and recognized as primarily of interest to the national Ministries of Agriculture and Water Management. The Coordination Group developed Term of Reference (TOR) for three components comprising the Syrdarya modeling system: (1) River Component: This component is a model of the main river and canal system of the Syrdarya basin developed at the BVO Syrdarya with assistance from the EPIC Program and national representatives in the Technical Group; (2) Energy Component: This component is a model of the electricity grid of Central Asia developed at the UDC Energia with assistance from the EPIC Program and the national representatives in the Technical Group; and (3) Planning Zone Component: This component is a model of the irrigation planning zones of the basin developed at the SIC ICWC with assistance from the EPIC Program. 3

From the TORs, the Technical Group prepared the three component models in the General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS) programming language. The three components (river, energy and planning zone) have been developed separately and each stand-alone component provides useful information and interim results for the counterpart organizations (BVO Syrdarya, UDC Energia, SIC ICWC, and the national water, energy and irrigation planning agencies). In the recommended second phase of work, the tighter integration of the initial blocks is envisioned. To date the planned first stage of work is over, and this report reflects its results. This Report is a two-volume document. Volume 1 is dedicated to retrospective and current analysis, and the assessment of the current situation regarding Syrdarya water and energy resources use. Volume 1 also describes the program complexes developed for the regional organizations BVO Syrdarya, UDC Energia, and the SIC ICWC. Volume 2 includes models, developed by national specialists to back up the regional models, or model developments that use approaches and principles programmed in the regional models. Generally, the models developed by the national specialists consider national interests and are compatible with the regional models. The models were developed using the GAMS optimization modeling language. The GAMS language was specially developed by an international group of scientists to solve complex resource management problems. On the whole it should be noted that the first-step modeling goal has been attained (see also Coordination Group Protocol 7): BVO Syrdarya, with assistance from the USAID/EPIC Program and other specialists, developed and is using a reliable model for day-to-day management of water resources and optimal decisions related to reservoir operation of the Naryn-Syrdarya Cascade. The output forms comply with ICWC requirements and are intended to promote ICWC substantiation and decisions. UDC Energia renovated and updated its main computation complex OPTIMUM with a core computation module written in the GAMS language for operational management of the Electric Power Pool of Central Asia (EPP CA) energy regimes. Production testing has started in UDC Energia. The Kazakhstan Electric Grid Operating Company (KEGOC), the State Energy Company of Tajikistan (Barki Tochik), and the Uzbek Ministry of Energy created a daily mode optimization model for national energy systems that promotes HPP load optimization. Kyrgyz Republic Energy Company (Kyrgyzenergo), using the BVO Syrdarya model, developed a complex energy model for the Toktogul-Naryn Cascade of HPPs, which includes the interactions of the Kyrgyz Republic and the other Syrdarya basin countries through water supplies and mutual fuel (energy carrier) deliveries. Uzbek and Tajik experts developed optimization models for reservoirs. In the Uzbek Ministry of Agriculture and Water Management the BVO Syrdarya model was attached to the Ministry s internal database. Production testing has started there. In Tajikistan, representatives of TajikNIGMI and Barki Tochik developed a model of Kayrakum reservoir. 4

Specialists of the Kazakh Branch of SIC ICWC and the Kyrgyz Ministry of Agriculture and Water Management tested the BVO Syrdarya model on the Chu River transboundary water system. The results allow the conclusion that the BVO Syrdarya model may have a broader use versus the earlier plans. This report is a product of work of the Coordination Group (members listed in Appendix 4), the Technical Group (members listed in Appendix 5), and the EPIC Program staff (members listed in Appendix 6). The implementers of the various Chapters and Sections of the report are: VOLUME I: BVO Syrdarya Chapter 1 Sections 1.1.1, 1.1.5, 1.2.1 2, 1.2.5, 1.3.1, 1.3.4 Chapter 2 Sections 2.1.1.1 2, 2.1.3.1, 2.2.1 2, 2.3.1 2 Chapter 3 Sections 3.1.1, 3.1.3, 3.3.2 Chapter 4 Section 4.1 UDC Energia Chapter 1 Sections 1.3.2, 1.3.3 Chapter 2 Sections 2.1.2, 2.1.3.2, 2.3.2 Chapter 3 Sections 3.1.2, 3.3.3 Appendix 2 SIC ICWC Chapter 1 Sections 1.1.1 5, 1.2.1 6 Chapter 2 Sections 2.1.1.1 2, 2.2.1 2, 2.3.1, Chapter 3 Sections 3.1.1 4 Chapter 4 Section 4.2. Appendix 3 EPIC Introduction Chapter 3 Sections 3.2, 3.3.1, Conclusion Appendix 1 VOLUME II: National Groups Volume 2 5

INTRODUCTION... 1 6