Administrative Offices Assessment Reporting Rubric. Unit Name: Reporting Year:

Similar documents
PROGRAM MISSION STATEMENT

Institutional Effectiveness Plan Evaluation Rubrics

Student Learning Outcomes Annual Report Process

Patrice Lancey, Ph.D Divya Bhati,Ph.D University of Central Florida

SMART Goals Model. Specific. Measureable. Achievable. Relevant. Time-bound. Talent Management Learning Series 2

Written Marketing Plan Rubric

A Rubric for Assessing Public Impact LEGITIMACY ACTION POLICY. Applying the Public Impact Fundamentals to the real world

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW GUIDELINES

Michael Malone, MD Kellie Flood, MD Kevin Foley, MD October 15, 2015

Customer Processworks TM

Non Profit Governance Workshop

Strategic Planning Setting Direction Retreat

CHAPTER 4 THE EVOLVING/ STRATEGIC ROLE OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

+ Purpose of assessment and use in candidate monitoring or decisions are consequential

VISION. Vision. e.g. DRB-HICOM Vision: To Be No.1 And Continuously Excel In All That We Do. Manufacturing & Engineering Division

Business Plan Innovation Competition Student Guide

Create A Commercial Feed by M. T. Anderson

NON-INSTRUCTIONAL UNIT ASSESSMENT GUIDE

TracDat. Electronic Planning & Assessment Reporting System (AES) OFFICE OF PLANNING, ASSESSMENT, & INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH

The Synergistic Nature of PI Objectives

T R AI N I N G S P E C I AL I S T Schematic Code ( )

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY, INC.

Administrative Unit Evaluation Information Form Operational Goals {Office and Division Here}

WRITING A BUSINESS PLAN

TracDat. Electronic Planning & Assessment Reporting System (AP) OFFICE OF PLANNING, ASSESSMENT, & INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH

The Public Impact Fundamentals. Self-assessment tool

Equipment provided at the event site: One LCD projector with standard VGA cable One screen One table

Marketing Plan Handbook

Conducting an Organization Needs Assessment

Performance Appraisal 16/17

Values Auction Worksheet

Tips for writing a winning proposal

International Admissions at Macquarie

How do States Determine Jobs in Demand

ASSESSMENT REPORTING GUIDE

MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING. 5.1 Introduction

The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Results

M&E Specialist. Location: [Europe & the Middle East] [Turkey] Town/City: Gaziantep. Category: Programme Effectiveness. Job Type: Fixed term, Full-time

CAREER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM APPRAISAL GUIDE EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION

Delaware County Board of Developmental Disabilities Strategic Plan

Development Suggestions for Strategic Thinking

I. Process Management II. Interpersonal Management III. Communication and Influence

3/6/2014 HOSPITALITY AND RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT CHAPTER LEARNING OBJECTIVES CHAPTER LEARNING OBJECTIVES. Leaders Facilitate the Planning Process

Program Review Self-Study Guidance Administrative Units

ENGINEERING COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA Standards and Procedures System. Competency Standard for Registration as a Professional Engineering Technologist

COMPETENCY BASED EDUCATION. A blueprint for planning, executing, measuring, and scaling a student competency assessment infrastructure.

MARKETING PLAN. 3 Member Team IMPORTANT NOTE

Performance Management

Management Plan Rubric for Priority Improvement and Turnaround Schools & Districts

Updates and Reminders for the System for Assessment Management (SAM)

SMART Goals: A How to Guide

Strategic Alignment and Accountability: HFHS s Turning Points. April 17, Susan Hawkins. Sr. Vice-President, Performance Excellence

KRA Setting Guidelines

Advisory Board Members: Sample Board Evaluation Best Buddies Board Evaluation

PROGRAM MEASUREMENT SERVICE GRANT DETAILS

Institutional Effectiveness: What is it and how do we achieve it. Dr. Marjorie L. Dorimé-Williams Director of Academic Assessment

Performance Evaluation Form: Goal Setting - Performance Management - Performance Feedback

MAKING THE CASE FOR COMPETENCY-BASED EDUCATION

The practice of constantly assessing personal knowledge and skills and following paths for improvement. have been done by

NAHC Draft Strategic Plan

Scoring Silver and Gold Quality Award Applications. #5 Scoring Silver and Gold Quality Award

Ed.D. in Organizational Leadership Core Leadership Understandings. Program Competencies

Cultivating Our Future Rural Water Leaders Texas Rural Water Association

No Life Half Lived means we need to listen to people with our conditions and deliver well for them. We have identified four goals to get us there.

SAMPLE Marketing Slides for Building a Compliance Program

I want to clarify my priorities by defining my goals and the path to reach them

2016 Technical Assistance Conference

Marketing Plan Handbook

An IT Governance Journey April Disclaimer: opinion being those of presenter(s) and not necessarily State Farm

Developing a Strategic Plan Facilitated Workshop

Strategic Thinking for the New Reality: Creating and Executing a Blueprint for Your Custom Building Business

Appendix A: T&E workforce competency model

2018 Performance Evaluation Process LOUISVILLE.EDU

UC San Diego Core Competency Model Behavioral Indicators

Bay District Schools

Leadership Summit. Empowering Leaders to Succeed. Leadership Track

Bay District Schools

Progress Report on Student Success Programs: Using Assessment as a Continual Improvement Strategy

COMMUNITY SERVICE WORKER 1 COMMUNITY SERVICE WORKER 2

Targeting and Recruiting Excellent Employees. AACRAO Session /22/2010 Marc Booker

Developing a strategic plan for your organization. A road map for the future

APPENDIX C, Army Operating Procedures NJ - BROADBAND LEVEL DESCRIPTORS

Institutional Effectiveness Guide and Template for Administrative and Student Support Services

Leadership Forum Denver, CO THE NEW S&OP. Gene Tyndall, EVP, Tompkins International Jim Tompkins, CEO, Tompkins International

COMPLETING YOUR SUMMARY OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT EDUCATIONAL SESSION ONE WEBCHAT WITH ELAINE SCHILLING 26 APRIL 2016

TEACHER SUPPORT AND COACHING (TSC) ENDORSEMENT PROGRAM

Writing Effective Self Assessments

BEFORE STARTING: Activate the macros - Click on Options - Select Enable this content - Click on OK

Common Recommendations to Improve Nonprofits and Their Order of Implementation

How to determine what Buttons to Push to make them pay attention?

Indicator Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Effective Highly Effective

Assessment Rubric. August, for United Way Guelph Wellington Dufferin Applications for Funding. Give. Volunteer. Act.

FACILITY MANAGEMENT PROFESSIONAL

Prime Minister s Awards for Excellence in Public Sector Management

Educational Master Plan Goals, Objectives, Benchmarks

Participant Guide Lesson 5 Monitoring Performance. Slide 1. 1 DPMAP Rev.2. July Lesson 5: Monitoring Performance. July 2016

Effective Planning for Including Early Childhood Data in the SLDS Thursday, January 19, 2012

Inspector General: Inspections, Assessments, and Evaluations

Favourite Advertisements Chart

1 Introduction. 2 Program Evaluation Standard Statements. Int'l Conf. Frontiers in Education: CS and CE FECS'16 173

Transcription:

Administrative Offices Assessment Reporting Rubric Unit Name: Reporting Year: 2015 2016 MISSION STATEMENT Explicitly aligns with the university s mission statement. Needs refinement to better align with the University s mission statement. Not aligned with the University s mission statement. Describes the unique purpose of the unit. Identifies specific population(s) served by the unit. Too general to dis nguish the unique purpose of the unit. Does not clearly identify specific population(s) served by the unit. Does not provide the purpose of the unit. Does not identify population(s) served by the unit. Clear and concise writing. Lacks clear and concise writing. No statement provided. 1

GOALS Iden fies at least 3 goals but no Iden fies 1 or 2 goals. No goals are identified. more than 5 goals. Explicitly describes what the unit will achieve for each goal. Each goal is clearly aligned to the unit s mission statement. Needs refinement to better described what will be achieved for each goal. Goals need clarifying to better align with the unit s mission statement. Does not describe what the unit will achieve for any goal. Goals are not aligned to unit s mission statement. 2

OUTCOMES Iden fies at least 1 outcome per Identifies at least 1 outcome for No outcomes are identified. goal. some (but not all) goals. Describes the results that will be accomplished by the unit for each Outcomes are measurable. Needs refinement to better describe what will be accomplished for each Some (but not all) outcomes are measurable. Does not describe what will be accomplished by the unit for each Outcomes are not measurable. Each outcome is clearly aligned to a specific goal. Outcomes need clarifying to better align with specific goals. Outcomes are not aligned with specific goals. 3

ASSESSMENT Iden fies assessment method(s) Iden fies assessment method(s) No assessment methods are for each for some (but not all) outcomes. identified. Provides specific description of the identified assessment and how it will measure the results for each Each assessment method is clearly aligned to a specific Needs refinement to better describe the identified assessment method and how it will measure the results for each Assessment methods need clarifying to better align with specific outcomes. Does not describe the identified assessment or how it will measure the results for each Assessment methods are not aligned with specific outcomes. 4

TARGETS Complete / Meets Expectations Needs Improvement Incomplete Iden fies a target for each Identifies targets for some (but No targets are identified. assessment method. not all) assessment methods. Indicates the applicable expression (e.g. %, #, rating) and appropriate threshold for achievement of each outcome assessed. Each target is clearly aligned to a specific measure. Indicates the applicable expression (e.g. %, #, rating) and appropriate threshold for achievement of some (but not all) outcomes assessed. Targets need clarifying to better align with measures. Does not indicate the applicable expression (e.g. %, #, rating) or appropriate threshold for achievement of outcomes assessed. Targets are not aligned with specific measures. 5

FINDINGS Iden fies a finding for each Identifies findings for some (but No findings identified. assessment. not all) assessment. Each finding clearly indicates whether the target was met. Some (but not all) findings clearly indicate whether the target was met. Findings do not indicate whether the target was met. 6

ACTION PLAN Iden fies each unmet performance target or indicates that all current targets were met. Iden fies some (but not all) of the unmet performance target. Does not identify unmet performance targets or indicate that all current targets were met. Describes changes to improve functions, services and processes based on unmet targets or, if all targets were met, describe how the expected level of performance will be increased to facilitate continuous program improvement. Describes changes to improve functions, services and processes based on some (but not all) of the unmet targets. Does not describe changes to improve functions, services or processes based on the unmet targets, or, if all targets were met, does not describe how the expected level of performance will be increased to facilitate continuous program improvement. 7