Advanced Control in Water and Wastewater Systems

Similar documents
Aeration System Automation: Controls Strategies to Maximize Energy Savings at Low Capital Cost

SHOULD WE KEEP DO FOR NITRIFICATION CONTROL?

Sensors for Activated Sludge Aeration Control

SHOULD WE KEEP DO FOR NITRIFICATION CONTROL?

Planning for the Future Battle Creek s Approach to Upgrading its Secondary Treatment Processes

2015 ISA Water / Wastewater and Automatic Controls Symposium August 4-6, 2015 Orlando, Florida, USA

Bioprocess Intelligent Operating System -Beyond Ammonia Control-

Dundalk Wastewater Treatment Plant

Technical Bulletin 169. Design of Diffused Aeration System. by:

Energy Reduction and Nutrient Removal in WWTPs Using Feed- Forward Process Control

CLR Process. Vertical Loop Configuration

Energy Reduction and Biological Process Performance Improvements with Right-Sized Equipment and Next-Generation Process and Aeration Controls

Optimization of an Aeration System at an Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant

Dundalk Wastewater Treatment Plant

The following biological nutrient removal processes were evaluated in detail in the 2016 Liquid Processing Facilities Plan:

Energy Efficiency Projects for Aeration Systems:

On-Line Nutrient Monitoring-Operator s Job Got Easier

City of Andover, Kansas Energy Assessment-Wastewater Treatment Plant

CITY OF SUMNER: CENTRAL WELL DEVELOPMENT

Chlorination/Dechlorination: An Environmental Solution

Wastewater Treatment. Where does wastewater go when it leaves your house?

A benchmark simulation model for membrane bioreactors

Removal of High Ammonia Levels from Municipal Wastewater Using Humic Acid and Selective Bio-Augmentation

W O C H H O L Z R E G I O N A L W A T E R R E C L A M A T I O N F A C I L I T Y O V E R V I E W

2015 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.

EHS SMART-Treat Onsite Moving Media Treatment System

Aeration Basics the Bug s Eye View

Since 2009, the 7-mil-gal-per-day (mgd)

Taylor Creek Treatment Plant. Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Cincinnati

CHEMICAL FREE PHOSPHOROUS ELIMINSTION P-UPTAKE PROCESS

At the Mercy of the Process Impacts of Nitrogen Removal Performance on WWTP Disinfection

6.2.1 Intermediate Pumping Overview

Data element dictionary

Presentation Outline

Andrea Nifong, World Water Works (formerly HRSD) Stephanie Klaus, VT & HRSD

Increasing Denitrification in Sequencing Batch Reactors with Continuous Influent Feed

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

Choices to Address Filamentous Growth

City of Oregon Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Secondary Treatment Improvement Project Phases 1 & 2 FAQ Sheet

Demonstration of IFAS Technology for Cold Temperature Nitrification in Lagoon WWTFs at Clare and Ludington, Michigan

SSO Reduction Program. WWTP Effluent Violation Corrective Actions

April 29, 2012 Should We Do More with Less or Less with More? The Next Frontier of Wastewater Treatment

From manual to automatic at Spring Creek

BRISTOL- MYERS SQUIBB WORKS HARD TO BE A GOOD NEIGHBOR

Monte Carlo Analysis for Aeration Design

Alliance Power, Inc. Power Usage in the Aeration Basin

Algae Removal from a Facultative Lagoon System Using Dissolved Air Flotation. J. Patrick Pierce, P.E. Environmental Treatment Systems, Inc.

Results SAVING ENERGY IN WASTEWATER CITY OF MONTEVIDEO. Energy Savings: 626,300 kwh / yr. Cost Savings: $44,000 / yr

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2014

Compact Waste Water Treatment MBR /MBBR Technology

UPGRADING FOR TOTAL NITROGEN REMOVAL WITH A POROUS MEDIA IFAS SYSTEM

Operation and Control of Multiple BNR Processes in One WWTP

Evaluation Of Aeration Control

Ammonia Controlled Aeration. CSWEA 85 th Annual Conference. Don Esping, P.E. May 15, 2012

AERATION BLOWERS THEY ARE NOT ALL EQUAL Ken Brischke MWH 1801 California Street, Suite 2900, Denver CO, 80202

Why Controlling Wastewater Treatment?

Water and Wastewater Treatment Energy Savings Guide

Feedforward aeration control of a Biocos wastewater treatment plant

Optimizing Nutrient Removal. PNCWA - Southeast Idaho Operators Section Pocatello, ID February 11, 2016 Jim Goodley, P.E.

major control handles for the biological system include Solids Retention Time (SRT), recycle rates, external carbon dosing, and aeration control. As t

2015 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.

ANNEX C INFRASTRUCTURE & OPERATION

Integrated real-time SRT and aeration control in the city of Grand Rapids

Indian Health Service Sanitation Facilities Construction Program Wastewater Lagoon Operation & Maintenance

An Efficient Aeration Strategy Sits on a Three-Legged Stool

An Innovative Approach to Retrofitting for Nitrogen Removal

RESULTS OF ECOSYSTEMS PLUS INJECTION IN SECONDARY AERATION LAGOONS

Aeration System Improvements with a 5-Year Payback. Scott Phipps

Control possibilities in wastewater treatment

James Winslade Instructor, Environmental Resources Training Center Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville

Review of WEFTEC 2016 Challenge & Overview of 2017 Event. Malcolm Fabiyi, PhD, MBA Spencer Snowling, PhD. P.Eng

History of the Plant

Winery FAST & Floating FAST

Effective Use of Carbon in Nutrient Removal Systems

Application of Process Simulators and CFD to Optimize Process Capacity of WRRFs November 13, 2017

Post-Aerobic Digester with Bioaugmentation Pilot Study City of Meridian, ID WWTP PNCWA 2010

Secondary Treatment Process Control

SIMPLE and FLEXIBLE ENERGY SAVINGS And PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT for OXIDATION DITCH UPGRADES

Best practice in monitoring process, operation and maintenance of wastewater treatment plants 12 September 2011, Bucharest

Baltimore City Department of Public Works

APPENDIX D ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

AGENDA LOVELAND CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION TUESDAY, JULY 14, 2015 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 500 EAST THIRD STREET LOVELAND, COLORADO

CUSTOM-DESIGNED WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS

Filaments and Clarifier Bulking. Activated Sludge Plant that experienced high flow washouts due to filamentous bacteria bottleneck.

OSCAR Process Performance Optimizer FOR BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES

Watertown Wastewater Facility Plan. August 11, 2015

Contents General Information Abbreviations and Acronyms Chapter 1 Wastewater Treatment and the Development of Activated Sludge

ONSITE TREATMENT. Amphidrome

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2018

2017 Annual Performance Report

On: Effective Turndown of Aeration Air Blowers for Electricity Cost Savings

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

Black River Wastewater Treatment Plant

Ammonia Removal and ph Adjustment in Aerated Lagoons

Walter E. Deuchler Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers

IFAS Nutrient Removal Enhancement Retrofit of an Existing Contact / Stabilization Treatment Process at Neptune Beach, FL

DBP AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM CHLORINE RESIDUAL CONTROL IN CARLISLE BOROUGH

Energy-Efficient Waste Water Treatment

Transcription:

Advanced Control in Water and Wastewater Systems Mandy Poole, P.E. Jason Neighbors Dave Green June 6, 2014 AGENDA What is a control loop? Control Theory Pump Control Levels of Control Case study on Wastewater Treatment Plant Aeration Systems Measuring the Savings Wheaton Sanitary District Results Discussion 1

CONTROL LOOPS: Fundamentals A controller tries to maintain the measured process variable (PV) at a given set point (SP) in spite of disturbances (D). Process Disturbance (changes) System Set Point PLC Controller Output Some Process Process Variable Measured Variable Sensor Control Objective: The state we want the system to be in Process Variable: Our measured result Sensor: the thing that measures the variable we are controlling Measured Process Variable (PV) : the signal as-transmitted from sensor Set Point (SP): the desired value we want the system to achieve Controller Output (CO): signal to something that can be changed Disturbances (D): things outside of our control that change in the process that affect the process variable CONTROL LOOPS: Fundamentals an Example Objective: Maintain the temperature of a room despite the falling outside temperature. Process Disturbance (outside temperature) System Set Point 70 o Thermostat Controller Output (open gas valve) Room Temperature Actual Room Temp Measured Variable Temp: 68 0 Sensor (Thermistor) Process Variable: Room temperature Sensor: Thermistor in a wall-mounted thermostat Measured Process Variable (PV) : Voltage transmitted from the thermistor Set Point (SP): Desired room temperature Controller Output (CO): Signal to the gas valve / furnace Manipulated Variable: Possible gas flow rate to furnace Disturbances (D): Outside temperature, insulation/heat loss, sun, snow 2

CONTROL LOOPS: Fundamentals Water Example Objective: Maintain the temperature of a room despite the falling outside temperature. Process Disturbance Chlorine Residual 1 mg/l PLC Controller Output (chlorinator) WTP Water Chlorine Residual Measured Residual Free Cl: 1.5 mg/l Chlorine Residual Analyzer Process Variable: Chlorine Residual Sensor: Chlorine Residual Analyzer Measured Process Variable (PV) : 4-20 ma signal coming from analyzer Set Point (SP): Desired residual = 1 mg/l Controller Output (CO): Increase or decrease signal sent to the chlorinator Manipulated Variable: Chlorine solution flow rate Disturbances (D):Water temperature, water quality, particulates CONTROL LOOPS: Aeration Tank Example Objective: Maintain the temperature of a room despite the falling outside temperature. Process Disturbance DO Level 1 mg/l PLC Controller Output (blower speed) Aeration Tank Chlorine Residual Measured Residual Free Cl: 1.5 mg/l Chlorine Residual Analyzer Process Variable: Chlorine Residual Sensor: Chlorine Residual Analyzer Measured Process Variable (PV) : 4-20 ma signal coming from analyzer Set Point (SP): Desired residual = 1 mg/l Controller Output (CO): Increase or decrease signal sent to the chlorinator Manipulated Variable: Chlorine solution flow rate Disturbances (D):Water temperature, water quality, particulates 3

PUMP CONTROL Without control, pump output is fixed. PUMP CONTROL Using a VFD and simple instruments, the range of the pump increases. What about efficiency? 4

LEVELS of CONTROL Wastewater Treatment Plant Aeration Systems 1. Airflow-Based Control 2. Simple D.O. Control 3. Ammonia Feed-Forward Control LEVELS of CONTROL Wastewater Treatment Plant Aeration Systems 1. Airflow-Based Control 2. Simple D.O. Control 3. Ammonia Feed-Forward Control 5

WASTEWATER 101 BOD Bugs need X amount of air to be able to consume organics. NH 3 If there is more air than they need, the dissolved oxygen (D.O.) increases. TYPICAL AERATION SYSTEM CONFIGURATION The aeration system includes blowers, diffusers, air piping, and instrumentation. DO Probe Diffuser Flow 6

Airflow-Based Control Oxygen Demand Deficit Oxygen Provided Excess Time D.O. Time Airflow-Based Control D.O. 7

Airflow-Based Control + Simplest + Least Instrumentation - Least Control - High Power Use - High Operating Cost - D.O. instability can lead to effluent violations - (Future): Limits operability of BNR processes Simple D.O. Control The aeration system output is set to maintain a D.O. setpoint. DO Probe Flow 8

Simple D.O. Control The aeration system output is set to maintain a D.O. setpoint. Flow Control Valve Flow Simple D.O. Control Airflow D.O. Effluent Ammonia 9

Simple D.O. Control + Can rely on limited instrumentation + High Impact on Power Use and Energy Savings - Slow to Respond - Limited Ability to Respond based on Probe Location (i.e. can end up hunting) - Can reduce operational safety factor Simple D.O. Control: The Down Side As an influent load (NH 3 ) comes into the aeration tanks, the blower only responds after DO crashes. Effluent NH 3 peaks. Airflow Influent Ammonia Airflow D.O. Effluent Ammonia NH 3 downstream (EH) 10

Ammonia Feed-Forward Control The aeration system output changes based on the rate of change of ammonia influent. DO Probe NH 3 Probe Flow Ion Selective Electrode 5/27/2014 22 22 11

Ammonia Feed-Forward Control: Instrumentation 5/27/2014 23 Ammonia Feed-Forward Control Airflow D.O. Influent Ammonia 12

Ammonia Feed-Forward Control + High Impact on Power Use and Energy Savings + Maintains operational safety factor + Faster response than simple D.O. control + Minimizes D.O. peaks and valleys + Provides more stable effluent ammonia concentration + Anticipate changes in loading that would otherwise cause D.O. to sag - More instrumentation + (Future): Improved control for BNR and dynamic loads Aeration Control Summary Energy Savings Process Control Airflow-Based Control Simple D.O. Control Ammonia Feed- Forward Better than Nothing 11% more than simple D.O. Even simple control can provide significant energy savings Doesn t have to be at the cost of operational comfort Minimal cost of implementation (in-tank instrumentation, programming) 13

QUESTIONS / DISCUSSION Mandy Poole apoole@baxterwoodman.com Dave Green dgreen@bwcsi.com Jason Neighbors neighbors@wsd.dst.il.us 14