An Introduction to QBS. (Soil quality index based on the evaluation of soil arthropods) and its application - An Italian Experience

Similar documents
Biological indicators of soil quality The Emilia-Romagna project as example of application at regional scale

Impact of Swine Slurry on Soil Health Parameters

Olives ecosystems and biodiversity - considerations for action in the EU

Investigation of the Biomass of flying insects in the Orbroich Bruch Nature Reserve. using Malaise Traps in the years 1989 and 2013

EIONET Meeting National Reference Centres Agriculture and Environment 21 June Directorate General Environment European Commission

THE INFLUENCE OF AGRICULTURE ON BIODIVERSITY OF SOIL ORGANISMS (WHEAT FARMS OF AHWAZ TOWNSHIP)

Estonian case study Evaluation of agri-environment schemes biodiversity objective

Water and Agriculture

CAPRESE. Potential Options

ROMANIA. (The text of this summary sheet was finalised in September 2010 in accordance with the version of the RDP that was current at this time)

Implication of soil management on biodiversity: a case study from Italian vineyard

DINAMO - Increasing endangered biodiversity in agricultural and semi-natural areas: a demonstrative management model LIFE08 NAT/IT/000324

Background Paper. Sustainable Bioenergy cropping systems for the Mediterranean. Expert Consultation

Soil mesofauna responses to woody debris biomass management in the Canadian boreal forest Laurent Rousseau Lisa Venier (CFS) & Tanya Handa (UQÀM)

EVALUATION OF AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES

Cross-compliance implementation in Natura 2000 area in Italy

Soil Fauna Diversity Function, Soil Degradation, Biological Indices, Soil Restoration

Arthropod Diversity and Pest Dynamics in Various Production Input Levels and Cropping System Strategies

CHAPTER 8 GENERAL DISCUSSION

TURF: Is it really a Green Desert?

Brown hare numbers are increasing on the farm since ELS and voluntary measures have been adopted.

Regione Marche. Development Programme Non techincal summary. Roma, June 2015

Land use for agriculture

Water & Agriculture. Seamus Barron Nitrates, Biodiversity & Engineering Division

or 1

Identify what is meant by the terms biotic and abiotic, and name examples of each.

Sustainable agriculture, biodiversity Ageris farm network. A.Fougeroux

Protection of wetlands as an element of water management in rural areas

GLOBAL SOIL BIODIVERSITY ATLAS

Agricultural Heritage Systems Conservations, views from the European Union. BEAUMOND Hans-Christian EU Delegation, Beijing 2011 June 9

Thursday 15th July 2010

Promoting PES in the Danube Basin

From land demanding to low input & high efficiency feedstocks. Calliope Panoutsou; Imperial College London

Estimating the Overall Impact of A Change In Agricultural Practices on Atmospheric CO 2

European Learning Network on Functional AgroBiodiversity

Measure fiche NATURA 2000 AND WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE PAYMENTS. Measure 12

THE HIDDEN TRUTH Italy Piedmont Environmental impact of new Rural Development Programmes

Functional Land Management: A governance tool to develop the bio-economy? Rogier Schulte & Dina Popluga

Rhizosphere Affects on Soil Quality. Slake Test Demonstration Infiltration Test

Soil invertebrates in conventionally and organically farmed fields of winter wheat and winter oilseed rape in the Czech Republic

Assessing & recognising the soil carbon benefits of organic farming

Carbon Sequestration in European Agricultural Soils by Potential, Uncertainties, Policy Impacts

Grażyna Madej*, Gabriela Barczyk, Monika Gdawiec. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. Vol. 20, No. 5 (2011),

Distribution and factors affecting wild boar (Sus scrofa) damage in a lowland area in northern Italy

3 Outcome of the sustainability assessment

The Good Growth Plan Progress Data - Biodiversity 2017

Joint Research Centre (JRC)

The European Environment Agency

3BROCHURE PROTECTING BIODIVERSITY SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION PRACTICES - ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT -

Soil Treats, Gaps, and Technical Assessment. Agricultural University of Athens Costas Kosmas

Conservation Agriculture. Carbon Sequestration

Farmland and climate change: factors and lessons from farmed landscapes. ELO Biodiversity Conference Brussels 9 December 2015

S P A I N COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY

Aus dem Institut für Betriebswirtschaft, Agrarstruktur und ländliche Räume

EDAPHOLOG monitoring system: automatic, real-time detection of soil microarthropods

Short rotation coppice strips integrated with site-typical crop rotation

Managing archaeological sites in arable systems. Some farming issues

Country fact sheet. Land cover Italy. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

All farmers subject to greening. Crop Diversification Permanent grassland Ecological focus area (EFA)

Theale Recycling. Site Biodiversity Action Plan

Control and Management. The Biosphere SG Biology

Natura 2000: Benefits and Opportunities for Farmers. Małgorzata Siuta, CEEweb for Biodiversity and Olivia Lewis

Economic Modeling of Hungarian Farms Incorporating Nature Conservation. Svetlana Acs, Paul Berentsen, Katalin Takacs-Gyorgy, Ruud Huirne

Fiona Thorne Outlook for Inputs. Ag Econ and Farm Surveys Dept.

Sustainable Farming: Take a closer look at Crop Protection. Friedhelm Schmider

HP 302 Pre-Course Survey

Country fact sheet. Land cover Serbia. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

Preserving agricultural soils in the EU

STUDIES ON SEASONAL VARIATIONS IN THE DIVERSITY PATTERN OF SOIL ARTHROPODS IN RUBBER PLANTATIONS - CENTRAL TRAVANCORE AREA

Best practices of grassland management in Greece and their evaluation

Cross Compliance. Click to edit Master title style. Bob Bulmer

EFFCTS OF THERMAL POWER FLY ASHES ON THE POPULATION STRUCTURE OF SOIL MICRO-ARTHROPODS AT KOLAGHAT, EAST MIDNAPORE DISTRICT, WEST BENGAL

European Climate Change Programme (ECCP) Working Group on Sinks Related to Agricultural Soils

Greening Agriculture Policies and Laws

7.7.6 Biodiversity. 39 minutes. 39 marks. Page 1 of 10

DG ENV - EU Soil Policy and soil erosion. Soil erosion modelling workshop, Ispra 20 March 2017

Agri-environmental reporting - a national experience

Riparian Vegetation Protections. Heritage Tree Protection

Environmental Research of the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety

The Management of the Yale School Forests

THE HIDDEN TRUTH Italy Veneto Environmental impact of new Rural Development Programmes

Marconi V., Raggi M. and Viaggi D. SPARD project - Spatial Econometric Analysis: RDPs evaluation

Biodiversity. 7.10B describe how biodiversity contributes to the sustainability of an ecosystem.

AMPHIBIAN DIVERSITY SURVEY AND CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT IN THE LAKE TUMBA WETLAND EQUATEUR PROVINCE, DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO

REALIZATION OF AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM IN WESTERN POMERANIA IN THE YEARS

Biodiversity For Sustainable & Self Reliant Farming. Done by Mr.V.Ravi Tamilnadu farmers Technology Association Sathyamangalam,Erode,Tamilnadu

o o o

LAND, WATER AND ENVIRONMENT FARM AFRICA S APPROACH

Building CSOs Capacity on EU Nature-related Policies EU Rural Development Policy

An Organic Primer ebook

Higher National Unit Specification. General information for centres. Unit code: DP4X 35

Aus dem Institut für Betriebswirtschaft, Agrarstruktur und ländliche Räume

Agriculture Sector Analysis

Bioenergy in Mediterranean Region: Environment and sustainability

FACTSHEET INTRODUCTION. help rebalance the water cycle, mitigate the effects of climate change and improve human health and livelihoods.

Bedfordshire and Luton Habitat Action Plan: Arable Margins

contribution of SWAT modelling to integrated land use governance

Overview of objectives and planning tools emanating from EU environmental legislation

Wadden Sea - Wadden Sea estuary, nature and environment improvement project LIFE99 NAT/DK/006456

AGRICULTURE. Chapter 10 Key Issue 3. Textbook: p Vocabulary: #9-10, 13-16, 18-27

Transcription:

An Introduction to QBS (Soil quality index based on the evaluation of soil arthropods) and its application - An Italian Experience

Mesofauna as bio-indicators Their number is outstanding Their role in soil formation and transformation is well-recognized The area covered during their life cycle is strictly representative of the site under examination Their life time and natural history allow to obtain interesting considerations on soil ecological conditions, and finally Several species belonging to this group have already been recognized as useful biological indicators of soil quality.

Soil Biota Knowledge

The QBS Index In general, soil invertebrate-based indices consider the consistency and richness of populations Most recently, the QBS Index Qualita Biologica del Suolo or Biological Quality of Soil was proposed. QBS index is based on the concept that the higher is soil quality, the higher will be the number of microarthropod groups well adapted to soil habitat

Taxonomic requirements of QBS Index Reduction or loss of pigmentation and visual apparatus Streamlined body form Reduced and more compact appendages (hair, antenna, legs) Reduction or loss of flying Jumping or running adaptations Reduced water-retention capacity

Main Phases of QBS Application Sampling Micro-arthropods extraction Setting the collected specimens Determination of biological forms Calculation of QBS Index

Sampling Samples for QBS calculation has to be collected when soil is wet and not after heavy rain. A 10*10 cm area is dug up to 10 cm depth.

Extraction of microarthropods Samples have to be carried in a thermal shock Soil fauna has to be extracted within 48 hours of sampling A simple and best Berlese-Tullgren funnel (25 cm dia, 2 mm mesh, 60 W lamp at 25 cm distance) can be used. Extraction duration (never less than 5 days) will be proportionate to water content in the sample. It will be slightly shorter for litter. Preservation should be done with 2 parts ethanol 75% and 1 part glycerol.

Specimens Setting Extracted specimens are observed under a stereomicroscope at low magnification (range 5-100x; usually 20-40x are sufficient) by pouring the animals with the liquid. Collembolans are separately treated.

Separation

Separation of Collembolas

Case Study 1: Permanent grasslands and arable lands - Balugola (BA): this is the oldest permanent grassland, established around 1736 and irrigated by traditional flood irrigation method until some years ago. - Botti (BO): flood irrigated permanent (> 100 years) grassland. - Galli (GA): permanent (> 100 years) grasslands, but not irrigated in the previous 20 years. - Medica (ME): former vineyard (30 years ago). At the time of sampling it had been cultivated with alfalfa for 2 years. - Troni (TR): former permanent grassland (> 100 years), ploughed for the first time 20 years ago. At the time of sampling it was cultivated with sugarbeet.

Application of QBS The biological soil quality was evaluated by using the QBS Collembola (QBS-c) and QBS Arthropods (QBS-ar). The QBS-c values were particularly high in the irrigated permanent grassland (Botti), owing to the high occurrence of species well adapted to edaphic life and submersion (Folsomides parvulus)

Result

Result

Conclusions The soils of Botti and Medica are very similar in species richness, but quite different as far as QBS-c is concerned. According to the increasing values of QBS-ar and QBS-c, the soils of the study sites can be ordered along the following sequence Troni < Medica < Balugola < Galli.

Case Study 2: Land use comparison at Rubiano site The objective of the research was to evaluate the biodiversity and the soil quality associated to different land uses. For this purpose, ten study sites were chosen.

Case Study 2: Land use comparison at Rubiano site Main characteristics of the selected sites were:

Soil microarthropods taxa, EMI and QBS for the Rubbiano sites

Regression between SDI (Soil Disturbance Intensity) and QBS for the Rubbiano study area The intensity of human disturbance on soil (SDI Soil Disturbance Intensity) was expressed as the inverse of the number of the years since the last tillage operation; for shrubland and wood, conventional values of 0.03 and 0.01 respectively were adopted. In Fig. 1, the regression of QBS on SDI is shown; the analysis of these data produced a significant fitting: r2 = 0.83 (P <0.01).

Case Study 3: Sewage sludge impact on soil microarthropods and earthworms The objective of this experiment was the evaluation of the effects of sewage sludge application on microarthropods communities and the possible heavy metals accumulation in earthworm. The study area is represented by Cremona province, in Po valley (Northern Italy). Inside the study area three experimental sites, corresponding to the more diffuse soil types, were chosen; for each site one field treated with sewage sludge (during a period ranging between 1 and 3 years) and a second one, with the same crop and management, but without sewage sludge application were sampled.

Results The results showed that the application of sewage sludge to the investigated soils not reduced the biodiversity of soil microarthropods.

Case Study 4: Land use and crop types in the Taro River Regional Park (Peretti, 2000) The present research was aimed to characterise microarthropod communities in relation to land use and crop type within the Taro River Regional Park (Parma). The study sites were located in the areas used by the bird Burhinus oedicnemus during the feeding activity, as a part of the LIFE Project 98NAT/IT/5138 Restoration of river habitat for bird communities. Fifteen areas were sampled, with three replicates for each area. The sampling campaign was carried out between May and October 2000.

QBS values for different crops/land use

Case Study 5: Organic and Conventional Farming The aim of this study was the comparison of the impacts on soil microarthropods, caused by different agricultural systems (organic and conventional) on different crops. For this purpose two study areas, both within Parma province, were chosen: Fraore and Bazzano. Fraore is located in the upper part of Po valley, near Parma; the elevation is 55 m a.s.l., the landscape is dominated by agricultural land uses with few trees or hedges and high inputs of fertilisers and pesticides. Bazzano is located on the Apennine, the elevation is 470 m a.s.l..; the land use is characterised by extensive agricultural areas and wooded areas. For each study area soil samples for microarthropods extraction were collected from fields cultivated with different crops and with different systems (organic and conventional); from the microarthropds extracted the QBS and the Collembola/Acari ratios were calculated.

QBS and Collembola/Acari ratio (C/A) for organic and conventional crops at Fraore (Parma) and Bazzano (Parma) sites

Conclusions The analysis of the overall data showed significant differences in QBS values determined by land use type. Three main land use types were found among the case studies: forest, permanent grasslands + poliennial crops, arable lands (annual crops); the QBS average values increase according to the anthropic pressure reduction. The analysis of single eu-edaphic taxa as a function of land use showed that some groups, such as Acari or Collembola are not or weakly affected by land use type, while Protura, Diplopoda, Chilopoda and Pseudoscorpionida are strongly affected. Also the agricultural system (i.e. conventional, organic) generally determines significant differences in QBS values; however these differences are larger for the most intensive crops, such as corn or tomato, and smaller (in some case not significant) for the low input crops, such as wheat and barley.