EU Agri-Environmental indicators and the Rural Development CMEF indicators (Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework): a coherent system of analysis

Similar documents
Agricultural statistics and AEI

Scoping document: biodiversity indicators. related to agriculture

Contribution of the EU agricultural policy to climate change mitigation

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in the Puglia region

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania

Rural development toolbox for Natura 2000

The High Nature Value farming concept: Copernicus contribution

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in the Balearic islands

Approaches in using common Rural Development indicators in regional RDPs

Agri-environment-climate measures: support for results, controllability and the way to go?

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in Slovenia

SCIENTIFIC SESSION MENER 2006 INDICATORS INTEGRATING THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS INTO AGRICULTURE AND RURAL WATER POLICY

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in Lithuania

EIONET Meeting National Reference Centres Agriculture and Environment 21 June Directorate General Environment European Commission

European Rural Development Policy and Mountain Regions

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in Niedersachsen and Bremen

Case Study RDP Azores

EU forest-related policy framework. Marius Lazdinis Unit Bioenergy, biomass, forestry, and climate change, DG Agriculture and Rural Development

Spatial data needs in the new CAP and beyond

Rural Development. and EIP AGRI

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in the La Réunion region

The rural development policy : future skills needs in the agrifood

Guidance note D Hierarchy of Objectives

Farming & the Delivery of Public Goods

The new CAP A new era of evidence-based policy making? ÖGA Annual Conference an REECAP Workshop Franz Sinabell 27. Sept 2018

Rural Development Program of Region Veneto. AGRI E.I.4, Bruxelles, September 2007

EU Rural Development Policy: Architecture and Implementation

Rural Development Programmes

ROMANIA. (The text of this summary sheet was finalised in September 2010 in accordance with the version of the RDP that was current at this time)

Guidance note B Evaluation guidelines

Cross compliance & FAS post 2014

SUMMARY objective evaluation relevance financial effectiveness

Rural Development Programmes

Implications of climate and energy policy on the agricultural and forestry sectors

Average farm size ha UAA/holding (3) 4.0. Planned total public expenditure: EUR

FRANCE MIDI-PYRÉNÉES

Farm data needed for agri-environmental reporting

Rural Development Programmes

CAP Post Key issues from the Environmental Pillar

Integration for Biodiversity in European Union

Measure fiche NATURA 2000 AND WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE PAYMENTS. Measure 12

Climate Change and Renewable Energy issues in RDP

P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 Needs to be monitored and reported by priority and focus area 2a 2b 3a 3b a b c 5a 5b 5c 5d 5e 6a 6b 6c

ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE OF AGRICULTURE IN OECD COUNTRIES SINCE 1990: European Union Country Section

Synthesis of ex-post evaluations of Rural Development Programmes Presentation of the synthesis

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in Luxembourg

Guidelines on the management of farmland in Natura 2000

Regione Marche. Development Programme Non techincal summary. Roma, June 2015

Conciliate farming interests with biodiversity conservation requirements, the perspective of farmers

Agricultural Heritage Systems Conservations, views from the European Union. BEAUMOND Hans-Christian EU Delegation, Beijing 2011 June 9

THE HIDDEN TRUTH Spain Castilla y León Environmental impact of new Rural Development Programmes

PART III.12.C SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SHEET ON AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL

Average farm size ha UAA/holding (3) 4.7. Planned total public expenditure: EUR

Technical Specification EEA/EAS/03/002 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION

High Nature Value farming indicators: what are they really for?

EU COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY IN RELATION TO THE LANDSCAPE

Guidance note I Result Indicator Fiches

Target indicator fiches for Pillar II (Priorities 1 to 6)

2. Intervention logic 2.1 The intervention logic of rural development policy in

QUESTIONS FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES JUNE 2015 WORKING DOCUMENT COMMON EVALUATION QUESTIONS FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT MARCH 2015

Common Agricultural Policy Regionalised Impact The Rural Development Dimension

Rural Development Programme (RDP) of Azores, Portugal. General socio-economic situation in rural areas in the Azores region

Land Use and Soil Protection in Europe

THE HIDDEN TRUTH Italy Piedmont Environmental impact of new Rural Development Programmes

European Union Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

Key conservation policies and their targets

DG ENV - EU Soil Policy and soil erosion. Soil erosion modelling workshop, Ispra 20 March 2017

THE HIDDEN TRUTH Italy Veneto Environmental impact of new Rural Development Programmes

Rural Development

Estonian case study Evaluation of agri-environment schemes biodiversity objective

Average farm size ha UAA/holding (3) 4.0. Planned total public expenditure: EUR

NATIONAL RURAL NETWORK RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME GREECE MAY 2010

Building CSOs Capacity on EU Nature-related Policies EU Rural Development Policy

RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (RDP) OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA. Integration of Environmental and Climate Policy into the RDP

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in the Madeira region

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

State of play of CAP measure Agri-environment payments in the European Union

The European Commission (EC) is due to present a proposal during 2000 for a new regime to be implemented from November 2001.

Overview of objectives and planning tools emanating from EU environmental legislation

Background Paper. Sustainable Bioenergy cropping systems for the Mediterranean. Expert Consultation

Monitoring and Evaluation for RDPs Comments from Greece

Case Study of Payments for Environmental Services: the United Kingdom

Olives ecosystems and biodiversity - considerations for action in the EU

EXPERIENCE FROM THE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES - AUSTRIA Brussels, 23 th March 2016

Farm structure survey key data source for environmentally related farm management practices

IS THE CAP FIT FOR PURPOSE? September Tallinn

Water and Agriculture

COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY post-2020 The new green architecture

The EU's Rural Development Policy in the period

MAES pilot on agro-ecosystems and their services

Use of Grasslands in the Republic of Serbia

HNV and results-based payment schemes

Factsheet on Rural Development Programme for Latvia

Natura 2000: Benefits and Opportunities for Farmers. Małgorzata Siuta, CEEweb for Biodiversity and Olivia Lewis

Public Goods and Public Intervention in Agriculture. Presentation based on the work of the ENRD Thematic Working Group 3

Climate Change and Renewable Energy issues in RDP

Symposium Agriculture, Mauritius Chamber of Agriculture Mauritius, October 2003 RECONCILING AGRICULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT: THE NEW CHALLENGE

MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Sowing opportunities to reap the fruits of development.

EVALUATION OF AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES

Transcription:

EU Agri-Environmental indicators and the Rural Development CMEF indicators (Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework): a coherent system of analysis Leysin (Switzerland) OECD Workshop on agri-environmental indicators Lessons learned and future directions 23-26 March 2010 DG AGRI - unité H.1 - Angelo Innamorati Angelo Innamorati European Commission DG Agriculture and Rural Development Unit H1 - Environment, GMO and Genetic Resources Brussels 1

Agri-environmental indicators of the EU Objectives: - To assess the interaction between agriculture and environment; - To monitor the integration of environmental concerns in the CAP at Regional, National and EU level. The European Commission adopted in 2006 a set of 28 agri-environmental indicators. COM(2006) 508 final At the beginning of this exercise, the Commission listed a set of 35 potential indicators (IRENA project). 2

Structure of the agri-environmental indicators Driving forces Pressures and benefits Input use Mineral fertilizer consumption Consumption of pesticides Irrigation Energy use Land use Land use change Cropping/Livestock patterns Farm management Farm management practices Trends Intensification / extensification Specialization Risk of land abandonment * Pollution Gross nitrogen balance * Risk of pollution by phosphorus Pesticide risk Ammonia emissions Greenhouse gas emissions * Resource depletion Water abstraction Soil erosion Genetic diversity Benefits High nature value farmland * Production of renewable energy * agricultural DPSIR model * can help for the CMEF indicators 3

Structure of the agri-environmental indicators State/Impact Biodiversity and habitats Population trends of farmland birds * Natural resources Soil quality - Water quality Nitrate pollution * - Water quality Pesticide pollution * Landscape Landscape state and diversity Response Public policy Agri-environmental commitments Agricultural areas under Natura 2000 Technology and skills Farmers training and use of environmental farm advisory services Market signals and attitudes Area under organic farming * agricultural DPSIR model * can help for the CMEF indicators 4

Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (CMEF) indicators CMEF indicators concern Rural Development programming period 2007-2013 and they are compulsory; To assess progress towards Community and National objectives in terms of sustainable agriculture; To improve the performance of the RD Programmes; The indicators are not exclusively targeted on the environment, but emphasis is given to this objective; Indicators are structured as follows: baseline, output, result and impact indicators; Environmental Baseline Indicators related to objectives Biodiversity: population of farmland birds Biodiversity: high nature value farmland * Biodiversity: tree species composition Water quality: gross nutrient balances Water quality: pollution by nitrates and pesticides * Soil: areas at risk of soil erosion Soil: organic farming * * can help for the agri-environmental indicators 5

Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (CMEF) indicators Climate change: production of renewable energy from agriculture and forestry * Climate change: UAA devoted to renewable energy Climate change / air quality: gas emissions from agriculture Environmental Baseline Indicators related to context Land cover Less favoured areas Areas of extensive agriculture Natura 2000 area Biodiversity: protected forest Development of forest area Forest ecosystem health Water quality Water use * Protective forests concerning primarily soil and water * can help for the agri-environmental indicators 6

Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (CMEF) indicators Environmental Output Indicators Vocational training and information actions (maintenance and enhancement of landscape and protection of environment): - number of participants number of training days * Use advisory services: - number of farmers supported * Meeting standards based on Community legislation: - number of beneficiaries Natura 2000 payments and payments linked to the Water Framework Directive: - number of supported holdings supported agricultural land Payments to farmers in less favoured areas: - number of holdings supported agricultural land Agri-environmental payments * : - number of holdings receiving support total area under support number of contracts number of actions related to genetic resources. (and Non-productive investments). Conservation and upgrading of the rural heritage: - number of rural heritage actions supported volume of investments * can help for the agri-environmental indicators 7

Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (CMEF) indicators Environmental Result Indicators improving the environment and the countryside through land management Area under successful land management contributing to: Biodiversity and high nature value farming/forestry * Water quality Climate change Soil quality Avoidance of marginalisation and land abandonment * can help for the agri-environmental indicators 8

Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (CMEF) indicators Environmental Impact Indicators Reversing biodiversity decline Maintenance of high nature value farmland and forestry * Improvement of water quality Contribution to combat climate change AEI and CMEF indicators are a coherent package: - Some data of the CMEF indicators could be used for agri-environmental indicators - The agri-environmental indicator system covers a wider range of issues, but in a less region-specific manner - The agri-environmental indicators can be a useful complement to the CMEF in evaluating the RD Programmes * can help for the agrienvironmental indicators 9

Use of the indicators to improve the CAP CMEF indicators: Monitoring: one of the purposes of the CMEF indicators is to provide information on the progress of the implementation of the Programme; The commitments and the annual expenditure in comparison with the objectives. For a possible adjustment of the Programme; Evaluation: another purpose is to proceed with evaluation in connection with the environmental objectives and comparing result and impact indicators against baseline indicators (e.g., farmland birds, number of hectares of HNV farmland committed, Ktonnes of biomass produced). Mid-term and Ex-post evaluation. To modify RD Programmes, but also to orientate the forthcoming programming policy of the EC and National Administrations; CMEF indicators focus more on the interaction policy/environment. AEI: more in depth environmental evaluation with a periodical compilation (every three years); They focus more on the interaction agriculture/environment. 10

Conclusions Agenda 2000 integration of the sustainable agriculture concept in the CAP; Beginning of the IRENA indicators project to monitor the integration of the environmental concerns in the CAP in 2006 results of the IRENA indicators; Use of the AEI in policy decisions Some indicators (simplified) were taken into account before the IRENA results (to prepare RD programming period 2000-2006 and CAP reform of 2003) : Farmland birds, pasture land, agrienvironmental surface, mineral fertilizer and pesticide consumption, intensification/extensification, specialisation/diversification, marginalisation (land abandonment). 11

Conclusions General information coming from AEI was used in the last modification of the CAP, the Health Check reform; Four environmental priorities were identified in the modification of the RD Regulation: «climate change, renewable energy, water management, biodiversity»; In this context useful information can be provided about the irrigated surface and water used by the agricultural sector on total water consumption and about the general state of biodiversity. In the near future the AEI and CMEF indicators will be used with more intensity to assess the state of the environment, in parallel with their continuous improvement and fine-tuning. 12