Regulatory Approach to Radiation Protection in new NPPs in Finland

Similar documents
Olli Vilkamo; Kirsi Alm-Lytz Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, STUK. Radiation Safety in New Build

Decommissioning plans for TVO's new reactors

Material Selection According to ALARA during Design Stages of EPR. P. Jolivet, A. Tamba, F. Chahma AREVA

SEVERE ACCIDENT FEATURES OF THE ALTERNATIVE PLANT DESIGNS FOR NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN FINLAND

Country report - Finland

National Status on Life Management of NPPs in Finland Meeting of the IAEA TWG-LMNPP February th 2017 Vienna, Jyrki Kohopää

Olkiluoto Infrastructure

Plant Life Management in Transition from Operation to Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Plants. National experience, Finland.

METHODOLOGY FOR ENSURING THE INTEGRATION OF ALARA INTO THE DESIGN OF

STRUCTURAL RADIATION SAFETY AT A NUCLEAR FACILITY

Regulatory experiences from implementation of SNF disposal programme from site selection to construction of disposal facility

ACTIONS TO PROTECT NPPS AGAINST EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL EVENTS AND R&D ACTIVITIES IN FINLAND

Decommissioning plans for TVO's new reactors. Pekka Viitanen TVO

Finnish report on nuclear safety

Nuclear Power Plant Safety Basics. Construction Principles and Safety Features on the Nuclear Power Plant Level

Nuclear Power Plant Safety Basics. Construction Principles and Safety Features on the Nuclear Power Plant Level

SECURING NUCLEAR SAFETY A FINNISH VIEWPOINT. Rainer Salomaa Aalto University School of Science, Department of Applied Physics, Espoo, Finland

Finnish Approach to Nuclear Waste and Competence Management

Regulatory oversight of nuclear safety in Finland

Enlargement of the Olkiluoto spent fuel interim storage Spent nuclear fuel management in Finland

Regulatory oversight of nuclear safety in Finland

Electricity for the needs of Finns IVO KOUKLIK DUKOVANY

ICEM A STEP-BY-STEP DEVELOPMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT OF LOVIISA NPP

How to Become a Capable NPP Owner/Operator? Experiences and Learned Lessons in NPP Owner/Operator Organizations in Finland

15 September Woo-Ho Lee, Seon Ho Song, Yong Lak Paek Nuclear Regulation Division. Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety (KINS)

GenIII/III+ Nuclear Reactors

Format and Content of the Safety Analysis Report for Nuclear Power Plants - Core Set -

Olkiluoto 3 EPR PSA Main results and conclusions fulfillment of the regulatory requirements for operating license

Approach to Practical Elimination in Finland

APPROACH TO PRACTICAL ELIMINATION IN FINLAND

Radiation Protection at New Reactors

Replacement Works for the Steam Generator and the Reactor Pressure Vessel Upper Head

NUCLEARINSTALLATIONSAFETYTRAININGSUPPORTGROUP DISCLAIMER

DIPDE RADIATION PROTECTION SUCCESS OF SGR - BLAYAIS UNIT 3. ISOE Brussels Julien BONNEFON (EDF DIPDE)

NPP Loviisa-3. Bilateral Consultati0n June 27 th 2008, Helsinki

Assessment and Management of Concrete Containment Buildings Life time management of concrete structures in Finnish nuclear power plants

Occupational Radiation Protection in Nuclear / Fuel Cycle Facilities Summary of the Contributed Papers

European level recommendations Sect. in NAcP 2 Generic recommendation for WENRA, Finland participates and follows the work.

Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management

Federal Authority for Nuclear Regulation UAE

Nuclear Energy in Finland - Licensing and Liabilities. Riku Huttunen Deputy Director General Ministry of Employment and the Economy

Licensing process for Hanhikivi 1 project Julia Virtanen Technical Coordinator of Licensing Unit

Safety criteria for design of nuclear power plants

Decontamination of the 4 steam generators, the pressurizer and loop piping at the French NPP Chooz A

DRAFT IMPLEMENTING DECREE. of 2016

Concepts and Features of ATMEA1 TM as the latest 1100 MWe-class 3-Loop PWR Plant

6.0 ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES

UKEPR Issue 05

Introduction to Optimization in Occupational Radiation Protection for Nuclear Power Plants in China

An assessment by the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority on the periodic safety review of Loviisa NPP

WM2014 Conference, March 2 6, 2014, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Challenges for a TSO supporting both the regulator and industry. Eija Karita Puska VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

Sampling of Reactor Pressure Vessel and Core Internals Ralf Oberhäuser

Regulatory Aspects of Spent Fuel Storage at Paks MVDS Facility

Nuclear power plant outages. 1 General 3. 2 General outage requirements 3

What has the ABWR done to reduce the potential for Integranular Stress Corrosion Cracking?

Ensuring a nuclear power plant s safety functions in provision for failures

Panel: Nuclear Renaissance - New Nuclear Plants Hot Topics

Generation III of nuclear reactors

AREVA AND ATMEA NEW PROJECTS

WM2011 Session 62 Training and HR Development in RWM

Communicating New Nuclear Power

Review of Generation III Reactors

OVER VIEW OF ACCIDENT OF FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI NPSs AND FUTURE PLANNING TOWARD D&D

EPR: Steam Generator Tube Rupture analysis in Finland and in France

Regulatory oversight of nuclear safety in Finland

FROG Owners Group A Worldwide Network of Experience. April 2012

Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management

Nuclear division. October 2015

AP1000 The PWR Revisited

BN-1200 Reactor Power Unit Design Development

Water Chemistry Requirements for a New Generation of Nuclear Power Plants

Best practices for preparing vessel internals segmentation projects

Technology Development, Design and Safety Features of the CNP300 and A New Small PWR

REGULATORY CONTROL OF SAFETY AT NUCLEAR FACILITIES

Phenomenon of (irradiation assisted) stress corrosion cracking for internals of PWR & BWR systems

Our environment LOVIISA POWER PLANT. Join the. change

Regulation of the UK Nuclear Industry

GE Hitachi's ABWR and ESBWR: safer, simpler, smarter

FRAMATOME S LESSONS LEARNED ON RISK-INFORMED APPLICATIONS (RIA)

Technology, performance, project delivery

COFRENTES UNDERVESSEL PROJECT IN RFO 16 (2007) [ Replacement of all the CRDH undervessel piping]

Our environment Loviisa power plant. change. Join the

LIMITED COMPARISON OF EVOLUTIONARY POWER REACTOR PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENTS

Step 2 Assessment of the Radiological Protection Aspects of Hitachi GE s UK Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (UK ABWR)

NPP Olkiluoto-4. Evaluation of additional information received after the Bilateral Consultation

Nuclear power plants observe a strict safety culture. Boat shed in Pyhäjoki, 2008.

Safety Considerations in the Transition from Operation to Decommissioning of Research Reactors

HTR-PM Project Status and Test Program

The role of nuclear power in Janne Wallenius Professor Reactor Physics, KTH

CLASSIFICATION OF SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES AND COMPONENTS OF A NUCLEAR FACILITY

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 46 No. 4 (Dec. 2009)

Advanced Sodium Fast Reactor Power Unit Concept

Heavy Component Replacement in Nuclear Power Plants

Angra 3 Current status and challenges to continue

Regulatory control of nuclear safety in Finland

Role of NDE in Regulatory Oversight of Nuclear Power Plants

Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management

Risks and challenges results from study

Transcription:

Regulatory Approach to Radiation Protection in new NPPs in Finland ISOE European Workshop in Prague 20.-22. 6. 2012 Veli Riihiluoma Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK) RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY

Content General information Regulatory background Sources, lay-out... System specific review Primary system material specification Dose estimation Future aspects Operational RP / PCC Lay out Materials, RMS Guidance / Planning RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 2

Some projects in NPP sector in Finland (status 2012) 2027 2030 Minor up-date of RMS (Lokit, RA) Lo2 Dos. Serv. Lo1 Seals YD RPV RPV PSR PSR Dos. Serv. Loviisa 1/2 PWRs Olkiluoto 1/2 BWRs Dos. Serv. RMS renewal Dos. Serv. Licence renewal/psr Constr. licence? Construction Operation licence Dep. for spent fuel Construction Operation licence? OL 3 PWR Febr. 2009 DiP Preparation 2/5 alternatives Constr. Operation licence Construction licence OL 4? 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 EIA June 2008 RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Constr. licence Construction Operation licence Hanhikivi1

Olkiluoto NPP (TVO) 2 operating units ASEA BWRs OL3 (EPR) under construction OL4 (TBD) ABWR, Toshiba Westinghouse APWR, Mitsubishi Heavy Industry AP1400, KHNP EPR, Areva ESBWR, GE Hitachi Hankikivi 1 (TBD) Pyhäjoki ABWR, Toshiba Westinghouse EPR, Areva Source TVO Source: TVO Loviisa NPP (Fortum) 2 operating units - VVERs Source: TVO Source: Fortum RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 4

Guides in Radiation Protection Guidance / Planning YVL 7.1 YVL 7.2 Limitation of public exposure in the environment of and limitation of radioactive releases from a NPP (in Finnish) Assessment of radiation doses to the population in the environment of a NPP 22 Mar 2006 23 Jan 1997 YVL 7.3 Calculation of the dispersion of radioactive releases from a NPP 23 Jan 1997 YVL 7.4 NPP emergency preparedness 9 Jan 2002 YVL 7.5 Meteorological measurements of a NPP 28 May 2003 YVL 7.6 Monitoring of discharges of radioactive substances from a NPP (in Finnish) 22 Mar 2006 YVL 7.7 Radiation monitoring in the environment of a NPP (in Finnish) 22 Mar 2006 YVL 7.8 Environmental radiation safety reports of a NPP (in Finnish) 22 Mar 2006 YVL 7.9 Radiation protection of workers at nuclear facilities 21 Jan 2002 YVL 7.10 Monitoring of occupational exposure at nuclear facilities 29 Jan 2002 YVL 7.11 Radiation monitoring systems and equipment of a NPP 13 Jul 2004 YVL 7.18 Radiation safety aspects in the design of a NPP 26 Sep 2003 RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 5

Lay out Guidance / Planning Lay out -> ALARA RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 6

Improvements in layout and design relevant to radiation protection 1 generation 2 generation - separation of hot leg from cold leg - thermal insulation in cassette form pre-konvoi - residual heat removal pumps separated from valves - increase of inspection platforms in the auxiliary building - elimination of welds to be inspected (e.g. SG cone, pressurizer) Konvoi N4 EPR - tanks/vessels usually set separately (e.g. liquid waste, coolant) - Considerable reduction of welds (RCL, SG) - shielded safety injection pump & pipe ducts - fuel pool and residual heat removal pumps, accessibility after accidents - separate access paths of many levels (avoidance of ladders) -widened transport and construction routes -2-room containment (EPR) -access-building layout changes (OL3) 4 2 3 - machines for changing filters & decontamination systems (gradually improved) RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 7

Detailed design Process -> ALARA RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 8

System describtions STUK TVO PHASE 1 PHASE 2 Room Classification according to Dose Rate for different buildnings (also air Contamination) Occupational Dose Estimates Shielding Reports Radiation Protection under AccidentConditions Functional and Radiological Requirements for Radiation Monitoring ALARA report... PHASE 3 RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 9

Autodesk Navisworks Review v.2010 SP1 location of components, piping systems, ducts, cable routings, cubicles, switchgears, instrumentation, civil structures Physical separation aspects Internal hazards analysis Radiation protection requirements RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 10

Lay out Materials Guidance / Planning Materials -> ALARA RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 11

Ni-58 + n -> Co-58 + p Cr-50 + n -> Cr-51 + γ Fe-54 + n -> Mn-54 + p Fe-58 + n -> Fe-59 + γ Co-59 + n -> Co-60 + γ Zn-64 + n -> Zn-65 + γ Ag-109 + n -> Ag-110m + γ PWR * * * * * * * * * RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 12

Material selection, SG tubes SG tubing material in OL3 was selected Alloy 690TT (nickel base, 58% Ni) better corrosion resistance (general C & Stress C Cracking) compared to Alloy 600 & 800 The cobalt content of construction materials in contact with primary coolant for EPR OL3 was specified as below: Stainless Steels or Ni-Cr-Fe alloys (other than tube bundle) Co 0.06 % Tube bundle (averaged over all castings) Co 0.015 % Co-operation between RP and material experts RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 13

Material selection, Co, hard-facing Stellite minimisation vs. increase of potential technical risk EPR (OL3) Konvoi P 4 (1300 MW) CRDM 2.3 m 2 1.6 m 2 1.8 m 2 MCP 1.42 m 2 0 2.5 m 2 RPV + internals 0.45 m 2 0.03 m 2 0.56 m 2 auxiliary systems and valves 0 1.0 m 2 2.3 m 2 Total amount 4.2 m 2 2.6 m 2 7.2 m 2 RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 14

Veli Riihiluoma 27.9.2010 RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 15

Material -> dose contribution Main contributors in Co-60 source term: SG tubing 10-15 % MCP 3 % RPV internals - Co hard-facings 15-20 % 1 2 3 4 RPV internals - stainless steel and inconel parts 60-65 % Main contributors in Co-58 source term: SG tubing 80 % Fuel assemblies (inconel parts) 7 % RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 16

PCC PCC -> ALARA Lay out Materials, RMS Guidance / Planning The primary coolant chemistry has to base on an optimized conditioning and on the limitation of impurities in order: To minimize coolant corrosion product (CP) formation To optimize CP migration and re-deposition To limit the corrosion rate of fuel cladding material (thermal effect and chemistry effects) To avoid oxygen formation by radiolysis (by hydrogen addition) To prevent localized corrosion (SCC/pitting) by limiting impurities (chlorides, fluorides, sulphates) Co-operation between RP and chemistry experts RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 17

Operational RP -> ALARA Instructions (integration of practices) Dosimetry Operational material/equipment in RP (Integration of functions with old units) Measurements (RMS-system) instructions/tests/maintenance Outage planning/work permits (short, well planned outages to minimize dose) New personnel (Timing of recruiting/hiring new personnel due to delay) Training (timing is a challenge) ALARA-planning - taken in consideration in all use of NPP Operational RP, PCC Lay out Materials, RMS Guidance / Planning RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 18

RMS -> ALARA Lay out Materials, RMS Guidance / Planning RP of persons Area monitoring Personnel monitoring Control of activity flow Start of reactor protection measures Process Monitoring RP of the environment and population Stack monitoring of radioactive releases Monitoring of liquid releases Monitoring of the environment MCR CRCS Technical support I&C Offsite support RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 19

In future RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 20

Doses for 12-months outage sequence Design criterion for an annual personnel collective dose: < 0.5 mansv / 1 GWe averaged over the plant life < 0.8 mansv / year for OL3 (1600 MWe) EUR document requirement for EPR: target for annual collective effective dose averaged over the plant life is 0.5 mansv / year OL3 PSAR: 0.425 mansv/year (12 months cycle) 90 manmsv average: 235 405 745 average: 280 12 month 24 month outage year RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 21

List of the future YVL guides A Safety management of a nuclear facility B Plant and system design C Radiation safety of a nuclear facility and environment D Nuclear materials and waste E Structures and equipment of a nuclear facility A.1 Regulatory control of the safe use of nuclear energy A.2 Siting of a nuclear facility A.3 Management systems of a nuclear facility A.4 Organisation and personnel of a nuclear facility A.5 Construction of a NPP A.6 Operation and accident management of a NPP A.7 Risk management of a NPP A.8 Ageing management of a nuclear facility A.9 Reporting on the operation of a nuclear facility B.1 Design of the safety systems of a nuclear facility B.2 Classification of systems, structures and equipment of a nuclear facility B.3 Safety assessment a NPP B.4 Nuclear fuel and reactor B.5 Reactor coolant circuit of a NPP B.6 Containment of a NPP B.7 Preparing for the internal and external threats to a nuclear facility B.8 Fire protection of a nuclear facility C.1 Structural radiation safety and radiation monitoring of a nuclear facility C.2 Radiation protection and dose control of the personnel of a nuclear facility C.3 Control and measuring of radioactive releases to the environmental of a nuclear facility C.4 Radiological control of the environment of a nuclear facility C.5 Emergency preparedness arrangements of a NPP D.1 Regulatory control of nuclear non-proliferation D.2 Transport of nuclear materials and waste D.3 Handling and storage of nuclear fuel D.4 Handling of low- and intermediate-level waste and decommissioning of a nuclear facility D.5 Final disposal of nuclear waste D.6 Production of uranium and torium E.1 Inspection, testing and certifying organisations E.2 Manufacture and use of nuclear fuel E.3 Pressure vessels and pipings of a nuclear facility E.4 Verification of strength of pressure equipment of a nuclear facility E.5 In-service inspections of pressure equipment of a nuclear facility E.6 Buildings and structures of a nuclear facility E.7 Electrical and I&C equipment of a nuclear facility E.8 Valve units of a nuclear facility E.9 Pump units of a nuclear facility A.10 Operating experience feedback of a nuclear facility A.11 Security arrangements of a nuclear facility Collected definitions of YVL-guides: a part of the regulations, but a separate document. E.10 Emergency power supply of a nuclear facility E.11 Hoisting and transfer equipment of a nuclear facility RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY

Proactive Approach Keep the limits Optimize RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 23

Proactive Approach Keep the limits Optimize Operational RP / PCC Lay out Materials, RMS Guidance / Planning RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 24

Thank you Děkuji RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 25

Veli Riihiluoma 27.9.2010 RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 26

EXTRAS RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Veli Riihiluoma 27.9.2010 27

Regulatory Oversight (man-years/npp) 40 35 30 Regulatory oversight [man years] 25 20 15 10 5 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 LO1/LO2 LO3 OL1/OL2 OL3 OL4 FV1 RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Source: Kaisa Koskinen 28

Applying operating licence Section 36 When applying for an operating licence, the applicant shall provide the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK) with the following: 1) the FSAR 2) a PRA 3) a classification document, 4) a QM programme for the operation of the nuclear facility; 5) the Technical Specifications 6) a summary programme for periodic inspections; 7) plans for the arrangements for security and emergencies; 8) a description on how to arrange the safeguards that are necessary to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons; 9) administrative rules for the nuclear facility; 10) a programme for radiation monitoring in the environment of the nuclear facility; 11) a description of how safety requirements are met; and 12) a programme for the management of ageing. RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 29

Collective dose estimation RB, shutdown 245 manmsv reactor work 22 % SG, PZR 23 % logistics (cleaning, supplies, scaffolding, insulation, reactor pool decontamination) 23 % I&C, ventilation and filtration systems 6 % pumps and valves 15 % management, operations team, health physics 10 % NDE, hydraulic tests 1 % RB, power operation 30 manmsv e.g. tests on polar crane, maintenance of HVAC systems, maintenance of the internal filtration system other buildings 150 manmsv e.g. CVCS, SIS, coolant storage system, fuel pool activities; based on Konvoi experience -> total (12 months cycle) 425 manmsv RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 30

Licensing steps in Finland Operating licence: Government Decision STUK s safety assessment on the technical and organisational aspects of the as build plant Operating Licence Construction Licence Government Decision STUK s Safety assessment on the acceptability of Technical principles and requirements of the plant Issued in February 2005 for Olkiluoto 3 Construction Construction Licence Nuclear safety Bidding & site preparation Construction: Review and approval of the detailed design Oversight of manufacturing and construction Energy policy Decision in Principle The EIA process involves two stages. First, the power companies prepare the EIA programmes and, a second stage, draw up the EIA reports. The contact authority for both stages is TEM Feasibility studies Environmental Impact (by utility) Assessment Decision in Principle: Political debate on whether using nuclear energy is for the overall good of society Government decision and Parliament ratification/rejection STUK s preliminary safety assessment Issued in February/May 2002 for Olkiluoto 3 Issued in May/July 2010 for Olkiluoto 4 and Fennovoima 1 On 1 July 2010, the Parliament ratified these decisions RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 31