CDRH Pilot Activities

Similar documents
Compliance Central: CDRH 2017 Trends and 2018 Priorities

CDRH s Inspection Strategy for 2018: How it Will Impact Your Company

Evolving Regulatory Pathways for Medical Devices FDLI Annual Conference Access materials at fdli.org/annual2018

Voluntary Pilot Meeting Preview: How will CDRH apply assessments in the voluntary program?

MDICx Q4 Quarterly update on the CDRH Case for Quality Voluntary Medical Device Manufacturing and Product Quality Pilot Program

Digital Health A PRAGMATIC REGULATORY APPROACH

U.S. FDA CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH UPDATE. Jeff Shuren Director Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP) Copyright 2014 BSI. All rights reserved.

Maturity Model Workstream

INNOVATION ACTION PLAN

Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP)

Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP)

Enhancing Staff Training for New Medical Device Reviewers

Document issued on: March 19, The draft of this document was issued on May 20, 2010.

Case For Quality CDRH Quality Metrics Project

Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP) Key Points

FDA s approach to AI in healthcare: New wine in an old wineskin?

Prequalification of in vitro diagnostics - Technical Update 24 November 2015

5 Countries. 1 Unified Audit.

David W Feigal, Jr., MD MPH

Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP) An Overview Canadian Experience

FDA Case for Quality MDDA Pilot. November 15, 2017 Rob Becker Director, Quality Edwards Lifesciences

Scott Colburn, CAPT USPHS Director, FDA/CDRH Standards Program

EU Unannounced Audits (UAV) Experience To Date Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP) Copyright 2015 BSI. All rights reserved.

Table of Contents Adverse Event Reporting SOPs for Medical Devices

Data Transparency and Quality Metrics

U.S. FDA CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH UPDATE

How Next Generation Electronic Quality Management Systems Equip Medical Device Companies to Handle FDA s New Approach to Quality Regulations

Sec Short title; finding. Sec Authority to assess and use drug fees. Sec Reauthorization; reporting requirements.

Prevent Quality System Deficiencies by Conducting Effective Internal Audits. Whitepaper

DITTA CONTRIBUTION TO IMDRF STAKEHOLDER FORUM

Health Industry Alert

Remedies for Supply Chain Headaches: Innovating Critical Process Manufacturing Oversight. March 23, 2016

MDSAP Me M dical D e D vice S i S ngle Audit Program

Trial acceptance of MDSAP audit reports in Japan

Abbreviated WHO prequalification assessment procedure

Re: Docket No. FDA-2017-N-4301: Fostering Medical Innovation: A Plan for Digital Health Devices; Software Precertification Pilot Program

Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP)

MDSAP AUDIT PROCESS. A Manufacturer s Perspective. Connie Hoy EVP Regulatory Affairs Cynosure, Inc.

Auditing Within the Culture of the Medical Device Industry & ISO 13485:2016 Overview. ASQ Quality Conference 2017 for Region 5 October 25, 2017

Global Harmonization Task Force Past, Present and Future

Diagnostics new product development: overview, WHO s scientific and regulatory role, regulatory pathways and demand creation

IVD Inspections Technical Update Dr Dragana Milic Medical devices inspections

Scott Gottlieb, MD Commissioner of Food and Drugs Food and Drug Administration New Hampshire Avenue Silver Spring, MD 20993

Oversight of Laboratory Developed Tests

CRNs as Foundational Blocks of the National Evaluation System for Medical Devices: A Call to Action

LIFE SCIENCE BENCHMARKING STUDY. Trends and Best Practices Based on Our Work with the US FDA and Over 250 Companies

Welcome! MDIC Case for Quality Metrics Workshop

Current Trends at FDA: Implications for Data Requirements

Human Subject Protection; Acceptance of Data From Clinical Investigations for Medical

FDA s Center for Devices and Radiological Health: Strategic Priorities for 2017 and Beyond

U.S. FDA CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH UPDATE. Jeff Shuren Director Center for Devices and Radiological Health

THE CASE FOR QUALITY: MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO PERFORMANCE IN THE REGULATORY WORLD

COVERAGE ELIGIBILITY OF SERVICES ASSOCIATED WITH A CLINICAL TRIAL

Guidance for Industry, Review Staff, and the Clinical Community

MEDICINES CONTROL COUNCIL

MDIC. Change Adoption Plan

International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF) and Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP) Working Group

Clarifying digital health and software regulation: FDA releases three new guidance documents

WHO NRA assessment tool: medical devices and diagnostics

Confronting MedTech Start-Ups Three Biggest Challenges: Initiating Regulatory & Quality

CAPA Management: Best Practices and FDA QSR Mandate WHITE PAPER. ComplianceQuest In-Depth Analysis and Review

Food Safety Modernization Act An Industry Perspective

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Regulatory Pathways for Medical Devices

FINAL DOCUMENT. International Medical Device Regulators Forum. Medical Device Regulatory Audit Reports

KPI ENCYCLOPEDIA. A Comprehensive Collection of KPI Definitions for PHARMACEUTICALS

PRINTED COPY IS NOT CONTROLLED

Medical Device Regulatory Roadmap SAMED Conference 2-3 December 2015

Product Quality Outcomes Analytics Update

Strengthening the Regulation of Medical Products through Networking, Cooperation & Harmonization

Medical Device Regulatory Roadmap SAMED Conference 2-3 December 2015

US Regulatory and Marketing Barriers for Medical Devices

Issues in Clinical Trial Designs for Devices

Murray Sheldon, MD Associate Director for Technology and Innovation Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) Office of the Center Director

WHO Prequalification of In Vitro Diagnostics Programme

Re: Docket No. 2006D-0347, Federal Register: July 26, 2007 (Volume 72, Pages )

AMI MQP Market & Regulatory Analysis. Kyle Cayabyab Jameel Galloway Matt Hammond Meagan Ward

Pharmaceutical Quality for 21 st Century Initiative

TrialStat Corporation: On Schedule with High Quality and Cost Savings for the Customer*

Agenda. - Introduction Howard Birndorf. - ASR Issues and the Draft ASR FAQ Guidance Patrick Balthrop

Pharmaceuticals BEST PRACTICES. A Collection of Best Practices for: Includes Detailed Best Practices for:

Update on the International Medical Device Regulators Forum

The Impact of FSMA on Manufacturers. Peter Begg, Sr. Director, Global Quality Programs, Mondelēz International and GFSI Board Member

GETTING READY FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION (EU) MEDICAL DEVICE REGULATION (MDR)

Nissan North America NNA achieved a 13.8% reduction through the implementation of an Enterprise-wide EnMS

Kathy Weil Division of Bioresearch Monitoring Office of Compliance Center for Devices and Radiological Health US Food and Drug Administration

SUPPLIER QUALITY MANUAL

A Risk-based Approach for In Vitro Companion Diagnostics Device FDA Approval Process Associated with Therapies that have Breakthrough Designation

FDA Food Protection Plan

Guidance for Sponsors, Institutional Review Boards, Clinical Investigators and FDA Staff

Medical Device Communiqué

General Comments. May 30, Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061 Rockville, MD 20852

Achieve Market Advantage While Streamlining Regulatory Compliance

Medical Device Safety Action Plan:

Case for Product Quality Outcomes Analytics 26-October-2016

Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Procedures for Handling Post-Approval Studies Imposed by PMA Order

April 30, Sincerely, Roger Brockway Director General

The Third Annual BSI Medical Device Regulatory Road Shows

The Brave New World of Medical Devices

Editor : Francoise SCHLEMMER Date : 09/03/2015 IMDRF, March 9 th 2015 REPORT Present : Hans-Heiner Junker Francoise SCHLEMMER

Transcription:

CDRH Pilot Activities Cisco Vicenty Program Manager, Case for Quality 1 Office of Compliance, CDRH November 15, 2017

VCIP Voluntary Compliance Improvement Program Pilot Status Description: Assessment: Modifications: NOT ACTIVE Pilot allows a manufacturing site to self-identify compliance issues and correct the issues before FDA inspection is performed. FDA Compliance Audit No additional cost to manufacturer FDA would allow one year to implement corrections before inspection. 2

MDSAP Medical Device Single Audit Program Status Description: ACTIVE PROGRAM The program allows an MDSAP recognized Auditing Organization to conduct a single regulatory audit of a medical device manufacturing site that satisfies the relevant requirements of the regulatory authorities participating in the program. Participating Countries: USA, Canada, Brazil, Japan, and Australia Assessment: MDSAP recognized third party compliance audit Performed annually Audit report and findings available to all participating countries Satisfies the site audit requirement for all participants but does not satisfy specific requirements for some countries or regulatory bodies. Manufacturer is responsible for costs of the audit Modifications: FDA accepts results for routine surveillance inspections Allows the manufacturing site to leverage one audit to fulfill requirements for multiple regulatory organizations Benefit: Reduces the burden and disruption of audits required by multiple regulatory body. Auditor provides more detail and guidance on findings 3

Status PMA CtQ PMA Critical to Quality Pilot PILOT Description: The pilot allows a PMA device manufacturer meeting the participation criteria to engage on new PMAs early in the review process and identify their critical to quality requirements, the relevant controls, and supporting data. The pilot objectives are to provide a focus and engagement on quality attributes earlier in the review Limited to 9 participants Assessment: Modifications: FDA Compliance Audit No additional cost to manufacturer Pre-approval inspection is waived for manufacturing site responsible for the product who demonstrates a focus on identifying critical to quality attributes and effective controls Benefit: Early engagement with the manufacturing review team and accelerates the premarket approval by waiving premarket inspection and performing a post-market inspection after 6 months to 12 months. 4

Status CfQ Voluntary Medical Device and Product Quality Pilot PILOT Description: The pilot focuses on using a maturity appraisal to drive continuous improvement and organizational excellence at a medical device manufacturing site. The enrolled site will participate in a maturity appraisal conducted by the CMMI Institute and commit to early engagement with CDRH and submission of objective pulse metrics established during the appraisal to monitor improvement and progress Assessment: Third-Party Quality System Maturity Appraisal performed by certified team Performed annually during pilot Requires submission of baseline performance metrics during appraisal and resubmission of the metrics as progress monitor at established intervals through the pilot year. Requires commitment for feedback into appraisal process and pilot Manufacturer is responsible for costs of the audit ($17K $35K) plus travel costs Modifications: Manufacturing site uses appraisal in lieu of surveillance audit Can be applied to US or Foreign Sites but only fulfills FDA Regulatory requirements Additional confidence and transparency allows FDA to streamlined 30-Day Notices submission reviews, Site changes, and PMA Manufacturing Sections Benefit: Reduces the burden and disruption of audits and focuses on shifting resources to innovation and improvement Waives pre-approval inspection for PMA Originals Allows streamlined submissions and accelerated review and approval Appraisal team provides feedback on what is succeeding, what has opportunity for improvement, what is or is not driving value for you customers or business based on your business objectives. 5

Status Digital Health FDA Pre-Cert Program PILOT Description: This program development pilot for Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) that focuses on assessing the culture of quality and organizational excellence of a software organization, identifying common validation principles, and identifying key performance indicators/metrics centered around excellence principles that FDA has established as part of demonstrating patient safety, product quality, clinical responsibility, cybersecurity responsibility, and proactiveness. The objective of the pilot is to develop an appraisal methodology that can identify excellence metrics that are common across manufacturers and incorporate the unique challenges of software development. This will be used to develop an a streamlined accelerated review and clearance paradigm for this software and digital health technologies. Limited to 9 participants. Assessment: No Assessment FDA Site Visit and Engagement. The site visit is not a compliance audit or inspection. Requires participation in developing of baseline metrics or KPIS for the excellence principles as part of the pilot commitment No additional cost to manufacturer Modifications: In this pilot, the selected participants are key to helping identify and exercise the types of engagement, metrics, and relevant KPIs. Benefit: Allows software experts and manufacturers to be part of developing what the critical elements of the Pre-Cert program will be. Creates a regulatory approach that can rapidly adjust and focuses on driving excellence not compliance Develops the Pre-Cert model which enables the agency to streamline and accelerate clearance or approval of digital health technologies. 6

Thank You!