Modeling For Managers. aq-ppt5-11

Similar documents
National Ambient Air Quality Standards

EPA Air Quality Modeling Updates

Hot Topics: Appendix W, MERPS, and SILs

Modeling 101: Intro to Dispersion Modeling Programs and Process

Estimating Ozone and Secondary PM2.5 for Permit Related Programs. June 2015

Status of EPA s Guideline on Air Quality Models

AIR DISPERSION MODELING

Metropolitan Transit. Prepared for. Original Submittal: May 28, Resubmitted: November 10, 2010 January 21, aq5-28

ISSUES RELATED TO NO2 NAAQS MODELING

APPENDIX H AIR DISPERSION MODELLING REPORT BY PROJECT MANAGEMENT LTD. (REF. CHAPTER 11 AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATIC FACTORS)

PM2.5 NAAQS Implementation & Permitting in Georgia

Single-Source Impacts on Secondary PM 2.5 Formation A Case Study

APPENDIX D MODELING AND DEPOSITION ANALYSIS

EXAMPLE AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS CHECKLIST a

Overview of Appendix W Changes

LINN COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT

Update on MERPs Guidance. Tyler Fox/Kirk Baker US EPA/OAQPS/Air Quality Modeling Group June 5, 2018

NO2, SO2, PM2.5, Oh my!?! Information Session EPA R/S/L Modelers Workshop May 10, 2010

New Source Review (NSR) Reform. Modeling Guidance: Policies and Procedures

AERMOD Modeling of PM2.5 Impacts of the Proposed Highwood Generating Station

47.0 GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICE STACK HEIGHT

Comparison of Features and Data Requirements among the CALPUFF, AERMOD, and ADMS Models

Comparison of Two Dispersion Models: A Bulk Petroleum Storage Terminal Case Study

APPENDIX III. Air Quality Modelling of NO X and PM 10 (2007) RFI Report (Dec 2007)

Cumulative Impact Analysis (CIA)

Kitimat Airshed Emissions Effects Assessment and CALPUFF Modelling

MPCA Air Dispersion Modeling Practices Manual

MODELING METHODOLOGY

Regional Photochemical Modeling - Obstacles and Challenges. Extended Abstract No Prepared By:

Energy Impact Analysis in Support of Class I Redesignation Requests. Prepared for. Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Cloquet, Minnesota

Air Dispersion Modeling Guidelines. For Oklahoma Air Quality Permits

Policy for PSD Modeling District Rule 2410 Guidance for Determining Modeling Domain

Technical Manual Guideline on Air Quality Impact Modeling Analysis

Appendix 9-C Cumulative PM-10 Emissions Inventories (PSD/Major Sources and Local Sources)

Complying with 1-Hour NO2 NAAQS

SO 2 Air Dispersion Modeling Report for White Bluff Steam Electric Station. ERM Project No The world s leading sustainability consultancy

Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling for Odour Impact: Practices, Issues & Recommendations

O3/PM2.5/Regional Haze Modeling Guidance Summary. Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS Western Met, Emissions, and AQ Modeling Workshop June 22, 2011

Comments on Hi-Test Sand PSD Modeling Protocol Submitted by Kalispel Tribe of Indians October 2017

2016 Midwest and Central States Air Quality Workshop. Air Quality Modeling in the GOMR Study. June 2016

AERMOD Modeling of SO2 Impacts of the Luminant Martin Lake Coal Plant

Dispersion Models ATM 515: Earth Systems Cory Mohn May 2, 2007

University of South Florida

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION BUREAU OF ENVIRONMENT DIVISION OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL

NORTH CAROLINA PSD MODELING GUIDANCE

Technical Updates Modeling & Monitoring

Air Quality Modelling. Table of Contents

Tips to Improve Model Results

NO 2 NAAQS Guidance. Supervising AQS. RSL Atlanta, Ga June 7,

Technical Manual Guidance on Preparing an Air Quality Modeling Protocol

AIR DISPERSION MODELLING IN COASTAL AREAS WITH ROUGH TERRAIN, USING CALPUFF PRIME

TAB E CLASS II AND AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS DISPERSION MODELING REPORT - REVISED

Technical Guidance Document for Air Quality Modeling

Atmospheric Air Pollutant

Evaluation of LRT Models to Estimate Single Source Impacts on Secondary Pollutants as Part of the IWAQM Phase 3 Process

Overview 2/10/2015. Anthony J. Sadar, CCM Allegheny County Health Department Air Quality Program. MARAMA Webinar. Part 2: Go to Slide 56.

GUIDANCE DOCUMENT. Engineering Guide #69 1 : Air Dispersion Modeling Guidance

NAAQS Update. Amy Marshall March 22, 2016

Diesel Powered Generators for STOR & Balancing Market: NO X Modelling & Impact Assessment Guidance

Permit & Photochemical Modeling Update James W. Boylan Georgia EPD Air Protection Branch Unit Coordinator, Data and Modeling Unit

AERMOD Training TRAINING AERMOD. Gaussion Plume Air Dispersion Model. Index. Course Agenda. The Lakes Training Approach

Introduction to Air Quality Models

Air Dispersion Modeling Guidelines for Arizona Air Quality Permits

Annual Monitoring Network Plan for the North Carolina Division of Air Quality. Volume 1 Addendum 2

May 30, Re: Draft Guidance for PM 2.5 Permit Modeling. Dear Mr. Bridgers:

75th Air Base Wing. Comparison of CALPUFF and OBODM for Open Burn/Open Detonation Modeling. 22 May Mark Bennett, Ph.D.

Modeling Tools Used in New Jersey s 126 Petition Against Portland Power Plant

Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Division

STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY

Chapter 5 FUTURE OZONE AIR QUALITY

Application of the AERMOD modeling system for air pollution dispersion in the South Pars oilfield

Air Quality Assessment of Ozone, Particulate Matter, Visibility and Deposition - Program 91

Molar Ratio Method (PVMRM) and Ozone Limiting Method (OLM) for Predicting Short-term NO 2 Impacts

Minnesota air quality index trends:

Evaluation of Options for Addressing Secondary PM 2.5 and Ozone Formation. Bruce Macdonald, PhD Jason Reed, CCM

Impact of gaseous and particulate matter emission for fluid catalytic cracking units

Policy for PSD Modeling District Rule 2410 Guidance for Identifying Sources to be Evaluated for Inclusion in an Increment Assessment

Update on FLAG. Bret Anderson. USDA Forest Service Air Resource Management Program Fort Collins, CO

Air Permi>ng: A Major Piece of the Puzzle or Trying to Keep All of

REPORT. Offshore Ironsands Project. Air Dispersion Modelling Study - Reciprocating Engines

Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency Air Quality Report - September 2013

GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATING THE AIR QUALITY IMPACTS OF TOXIC POLLUTANTS IN NORTH CAROLINA

Planning or Diagnostic Tool. Air Plume Modeling. Michael Gemelli, Lockheed-Martin/REAC, Edison, NJ. Keith Ocheski, Lockheed-Martin/REAC, Edison, NJ

Technical Backgrounder on Multi-Source Air Dispersion Modelling

Air Quality Modelling & Assessment Unit (AQMAU)

EPNG is herein providing supplemental environmental information, including certain attachments, intended to clarify previously submitted data.

Review of GHD s Modeling Assessment and Analysis of the Coal-fired Power Stations in the Latrobe Valley. Dr. H. Andrew Gray Gray Sky Solutions

Attachment 2. Modeling Protocol for Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Belews Creek Steam Station

PM2.5 Implementation Rule- Modeling Summary. Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS June 20, 2007

Significance of a CALPUFF Near-Field Analysis

Appendix B2. Air Dispersion Modeling

Sensitivity of AERMOD to Meteorological Data Sets Based on Varying Surface Roughness. Paper No A-168-AWMA

Practical Implications of Applying the DRR Modeling TAD Using AERMOD

Atmospheric Disperssion

HITEST SAND NEWPORT PSD MODELING PROTOCOL. HiTest Sand Edmonton, Alberta. Ramboll Environ US Corporation Lynnwood, Washington.

REPORT. Offshore Ironsands Project. Air Dispersion Modelling Study - Gas Turbines

Justifying a GEP Stack Height Taller than the EPA Formula Height

AIR POLLUTION DISPERSION MODELING IN A POLLUTED INDUSTRIAL AREA OF COMPLEX TERRAIN FROM ROMANIA *

29 th Annual Conference on the Environment-St. Paul, MN November 19, Sergio A. Guerra - Wenck Associates, Inc.

Feedback from Working Group

Transcription:

Modeling For Managers aq-ppt5-11

Types of Models Near-field *Preferred: EPA AERMOD model 50km CLASS II; Increment Far-field CALPUFF 50km 100+km CLASS I; Chemical Transformation What is used at MPCA

History of Modeling Point Source Modeling Gaussian Plume Model (1930 s) Maximum ground-level impacts/distance Still in use! (AERMOD) Urban/Large Scale Photochemical Urban/Large Scale problems (1970 s) Lagrangian Modeling Puff (Sulfur) CALPUFF Eulerian Modeling V/H grid cells (Ozone) Large-scale air quality models Long-range transport Chemical and physical properties Local, regional, national & global scale (CMAQ, CAMX, UAM) >1980

Air Dispersion Models Exist to Move pollution from a modeled source to a modeled world Images courtesy Lakes Environmental

Source Types

Point Source Characteristics Emission Rate Grams/Second Stack Height Stack Diameter Exit Temperature Exit Velocity

Model World Characteristics Wind blows Sun creates thermals Terrain Interacts Image courtesy Lakes Environmental Building creates eddies Pollutants transform Image courtesy Lakes Environmental NO + O3 => NO2 + O2 Nearby sources Background

Grams/Second Air Quality Model NO + O3 => NO2 + O2

Receptors Definition: the locations where impacts are predicted. uniform, polar grid uniform, Cartesian grid discrete, Cartesian grid

Final Results

Modeled Source Emission Rate How much stuff is being emitted each second Image courtesy Lakes Environmental Concentration is proportional to Emission Rate

Modeled Source Stack Height How high the release point is above ground level Partially determines how much pollution can reach the ground General rule: as stack height increases ( ), concentration decreases (fl)

Modeled Source Stack Diameter How wide the vent is at the release point Partially determines exit velocity General rule: as diameter increases ( ), concentration increases ( )

Modeled Source Exit Velocity How fast the material exits the stack Partially determines plume rise. General rule: as exit velocity increases ( ), concentration decreases (fl)

Modeled Source Exit Temperature How hot the material is as it exits the stack Partially determines plume rise General rule: as exit temperature increases ( ), concentration decreases (fl)

Plume Rise Warm plume rises until it s temperature is the same or cooler than the air above it Plume Rise Partially determines how much pollution reaches the ground

Image courtesy Lakes Environmental Model World Wind

Model World Stability Unstable Stable Image courtesy Lakes Environmental Unstable Image courtesy Lakes Environmental Stable Cool Warm Warm Cool

Model World Stability Sunny Afternoon Partly Cloudy Aftn. Cloudy Anytime Foggy Morning Clear Morning Partly Cloudy Mrng. Images courtesy Lakes Environmental The sun and cloud layers drive how these patterns set up. The model ingests these data from weather balloons.

Model World Terrain Stable Atmosphere Air can go over or around depending on how fast the air is moving

Model World Terrain Unstable Atmosphere All air moves over the hill

Model World Terrain

Image courtesy Lakes Environmental Model World Buildings

Model World Buildings Image courtesy Lakes Environmental Image courtesy Lakes Environmental

Model World Buildings Image courtesy Lakes Environmental If stack is at least 2.5 times building height, downwash will not come into play.

Model World Buildings L = Lesser of the BH or PBW BH = Building Height PBW = Projected Building Width Image courtesy Lakes Environmental If building is 5L away from stack then downwash also not in play.

Model World Chemical Transformation Ozone Limiting Method (OLM) Plume Volume Molar Ratio Method (PVMRM) Same Chemistry for both Methods: NO + O3 => NO2 + O2 Single Stacks Multiple Stacks 2D - Ambient ozone applied at each receptor 3D - Ozone mixed across volume of the plume.

Model World Nearby Sources

Nearby Source Tool

Background Background air quality includes pollutant concentrations due to: (1) Natural sources; (2) nearby sources other than the one(s) currently under consideration; and (3) unidentified sources. 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix W to Part 51 Guideline on Air Quality Models

Background Criteria Pollutant Monitors Ozone (O 3 ) Fine Particles (PM 2.5 ) Carbon Monoxide (CO) Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) (Courtesy: G Pratt, MPCA)

Facility + Nearby Sources + Background

How we use Air Dispersion Modeling Today MPCA/Regulatory Uses: Evaluate compliance with NAAQS and regulatory requirements Determine extent of emission reductions required Evaluate sources in permit applications Risk assessment Industry/Other Uses: Assist in design of effective control strategies Emergency planning by public safety responders/emergency management

Levels of Modeling: Screening How we use Air Dispersion Modeling Today NAAQS PSD SIL Refined Analysis of these Critical Values

How we use Air Dispersion Modeling Today MPCA/Regulatory Uses - Programs Supported Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Air Quality Permits Non-PSD: Federal Part 70 and Title V and State Only-Permits State Implementation Plan (SIP) Environmental Review (EAW & EIS)

How we use Air Dispersion Modeling Today

Questions Models Try to Answer Will a new source degrade air quality? Will Minnesota stay in attainment of air quality standards? Will human health be protected from hazardous pollutants?

AERMOD Can t Tell Us Exact location of an exceedance Exact time of an exceedance Exact concentration of an exceedance

Key Issues & Challenges New short-term NAAQS Background concentrations Emission inventories Model limitations Timeliness of EPA

Key Issues Current Actions EPA Guidance is scheduled to change Modification of model Clarify definitions MPCA Workgroup Modification of MPCA Modeling Guidance

Future Directions Modeled Background using MnRisks Modeling more involved and complicated Attainment issues Gridded met/terrain data Regional & photochemical modeling will be more common SIP components Environmental Justice and Air Quality (City of Minneapolis)

Disclaimer: Some images used throughout the presentation are courtesy of Lakes Environmental. Use of these images is not an endorsement for the use of Lakes Environmental s products.