SUB-SLAB DEPRESSURIZATION SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION

Similar documents
SUB-SLAB DIAGNOSTICS

DESIGNING COMMERCIAL SUB-SLAB DEPRESSURIZATION SYSTEMS

Designing Efficient Sub Slab Collection and Vapor Barrier Systems. Presented By: Tom Hatton Clean Vapor, LLC cleanvapor.com

Radon Vent Pipe System. Labeling Performance Indicators

Chapter 2: Foundation

Radon Control Methods for Existing and New Residential Structures

Presented by: Thomas Hatton

Annex A STATEMENT OF WORK Radon Mitigation

Indoor Air Quality Testing at the Middle River Complex. Indoor Air Quality Testing at the Middle River Complex. For More Information

NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY PROJECT NAME JOB # ISSUED: 03/29/2017

Indoor Air Quality Testing at the Middle River Complex

Radon Resistant New Construction. Topic 8 - Audio 64

BUILDING A NEW HOME. Construction Permit Tips For Home Owners

Testing Is Easy And Inexpensive

SCHOOL MITIGATION DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

Evaluating Large Buildings and Assessing the Feasibility of Applying Active Soil Depressurization as a Remedial Solution for Vapor Intrusion

BASEMENT FINISH PERMIT AND BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS (REVISED 3/6/2018)


Paul V. Jennemann MARYLAND RADON LABORATORY, INC E Corporate Court Ellicott City, MD

Environmental Management Plan Stone Quarry Apartments Project

Evergreen Project Implementation Plan Instructions Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program

Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Methods & Strategies

ARTICLE 12 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE 2012 International Residential Code Modification Summary (Statutory Authority: 1976 Code Section )

RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION New Dwellings and Additions

SECTION PLUMBING PIPING SYSTEM

Errata for the 2003 Uniform Plumbing Code Study Guide (5th Printing)

RADON WELLISUMP BASIN FOR NEW HOME CONSTRUCTION

CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS

NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY PROJECT NAME JOB # ISSUED: 03/29/2017

County of Yolo Development Services Building Inspection Division

APPLICATION FOR FINISHED BASEMENT PERMIT

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION NAME, ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP LICENSE# 058- LICENSE# SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER

ALVARADO STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA VARIANCE APPLICATION

RESIDENTIAL REMODELING AND BASEMENT FINISH

i-admin /15/14 2 of 3 Doc Type: Board Memo/Issue Statement

Andy Schreder CBO Building Official for St Francis, Nowthen

1 AND 2 FAMILY DWELLING REQUIREMENTS

Vapor Intrusion Mitigation. ITRC Shaping the Future of Regulatory Acceptance

INVESTIGATION RESULTS

SUBJECT: NEW 2000 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE (IRC) DATE:

Radon Mitigation Technology

PLAN CHECK CORRECTION SHEET FOR METHANE MITIGATION SYSTEMS 2014 LAPC

2010 National Building Code Adoption and Associated Process Changes

Work Order (Bid Form) Upper East Tennessee Human Development Agency

Chapter 8 MINIMUM CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS

TABLE OF CONTENTS PART III. REVISION 0 6-ii

RADON ABATEMENT FROM THE GROUND UP

IN2 Sleeves and Sleeve Seals for Communications Pathways and Cabling

Foundations. Issue. Slab-On-Grade Liquid Water Control (See Figure 2-2) Goals. Guidance

Quality Work Plan for Retrofit Installer Arkansas Weatherization Assistance Program Name Credential

INSPECTION TIMING CHECKLIST FOR RESIDENTIAL FRAME BUILDING PRIOR TO INSPECTION REQUEST

KORA_Req._for_Eng._Studies_on_Stouffer_Apts. KU Reference No

Section numbers refer to the 2018 International Residential Code (IRC), as modified, unless otherwise noted. Revised Effective Sept.

Guidance Document Risk-Based Corrective Action (RBCA) For Residential and Commercial Heating Oil Systems. National Oilheat Research Alliance (NORA)

New Insights Into Exposure Through Preferential Pathway Vapor Migration

WIRING METHODS CHAPTER 38

INFORMATIONAL HANDOUT FOR FINISHING A BASEMENT

Welcome to this continuing education seminar. This is the first of three parts of the Building Enclosure Fundamentals series.

TOWN OF HAGUE GUIDELINES FOR PERMIT APPLICATION

Administrative Changes

Work Order (Bid Form) Blount County Community Action Agency, Inc.

SECTION GRAVITY WASTEWATER LINES

Residential Plan Review for New One and Two Family Dwellings

Date Rater Verified. Rater Verified. Slab / Pre-Drywall / Thermal Inspection

DUPONT VAPOR MITIGATION PROGRAM

Encapsulated, Sealed & Closed Crawlspace Installation Manual

Pulaski County, Virginia Typical Carport Enclosure Details Based on the 2012 International Residential Code

* RESIDENTIAL PLAN REVIEW *

RESIDENTIAL BUILDING REQUIREMENTS

International Code Council

One and Two Family Additions

Attic Access Hatch to have an area not less than 0.32m²/3.4ft² and no dimension less than 500mm with a min R-15 insulation value Crawlspace

A. Piping materials shall bear label, stamp, or other markings of specified testing agency.

3. Intermediate metal conduit (IMC). 4. Electric metallic tubing (EMT). 5. Flexible metal conduit (FLEX). 6. Polyvinyl chloride conduit (PVC).

SECTION FACILITY STORM DRAINAGE PIPING

Application for Commercial Plan Review and Building Permit. Address:

Gas Protection System Components

BLASER VAPOR INTRUSION INSPECTION, MONITORING, AND MAINTENANCE WORK PLAN SEATTLE, WASHINGTON

Requirements for Additions/Enclosed Deck/Finished Bonus Room/Dormer

ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION METER BOX. Builder Installation Requirements February 2018

APPENDIX IV.F Technical Memorandum Summarizing Potential Methane Issues (December 2009)

Certificate of Use Application Package

IN2 Sleeves and Sleeve Seals for Electrical Raceways and Cabling

SECTION WELDED STEEL WATER STORAGE TANKS

PLAN CHECK CORRECTION SHEET FOR METHANE MITIGATION SYSTEMS 2017 LAPC

EXPRESS PERMIT INFORMATION

UCC Permit Application Procedures

Work Order (Bid Form) Upper East Tennessee Human Development Agency

Section BUILDINGS, SHELTERS, ENCLOSURES

CITY OF RICHMOND HEIGHTS DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING ZONING AND HOUSING STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS

Introduction to Horizontal Remediation Wells for Improved Site Cleanup Training Workshop

Lonsdale Building Inspections Department 415 Central Street W. PO Box 357 Lonsdale, MN (507) fax (507)

Practical Aspects of VI Assessment for TCE. Acknowledgments and special thanks to:

SPARTANBURG COUNTY BUILDING CODES DEPARTMENT

MASTERSPEC TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS DIVISION 22 PLUMBING. A. This Section includes the following storm drainage piping inside the building.

RESIDENTIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST

Distribution Restriction Statement

A. Section includes busway and fittings including plug-in units.

Measure 1 Seal Ducts Components Inspected

2003 International Residential Building Code

Transcription:

SUB-SLAB DEPRESSURIZATION SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION Prepared for: 1500 East Bannister Road, Room 2101 Kansas City, Missouri, 64131-3088 Prepared by: 6750 Antioch Road, Suite 305 Merriam, Kansas 66204 Contract Number: GS-06P-10-GX-P-0020 ACT Number: PJ0F00327 SES, Inc. Project Number: 050-06

1.0 BACKGROUND... 1 2.0 PRE-INSTALLATION ACTIVITIES... 1 3.0 SOIL DEPRESSURIZATION SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION... 1 3.1 Building 50 and 52 SSD System Design... 1 3.2 Building 50 SSD... 1 3.3 Building 52 SSD... 2 4.0 SYSTEM CHECK... 3 5.0 ACCEPTANCE... 5 FIGURES Figure 4.1: Fantech HP190 Performance Curve.4 Figure 4.2: SSD System Performance Table..5 Appendix A: Figures Appendix B: Photolog Appendix C: Component Information Appendix D: Logbook APPENDICIES i

System Design and Installation March 2010 On February 11, 2010, SES, Inc. (SES) was contracted by the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) to install a total of six systems (SSD) in their entirety, no later than 6:30 P.M. February 15, 2010. Available hardcopy and electronic files depicting the preferred locations of the SSD systems, building plans, and approximate locations of underground utilities were provided to SES by GSA at a kickoff meeting on February 12, 2010. The following presents the design and installation activities conducted, and associated construction drawings and details, for the SSDsystems. On February 11, 2010, SES team personnel conducted communication tests within sub-slab soils of Buildings 50 and 52 (see Appendix A, Figure 1). The objective of the communication tests was to evaluate thepotential radius of influence of SSD system extraction points. The test involved drilling one-inch extraction holes through the concrete slab floor at the preferred locations within each building to serve as an extraction point, with communicationtest points consisting of additional one-inch holes drilled through the floor slab at varying distances (either ten, twenty, and/or thirty feet) from the preferred extraction point (see Appendix A, Figures 2 and 3). Distances were determined based on existing underground utilities, proximity to exterior wall footings, and anticipated locations of interior wall footings. To impart a vacuum at the extraction point, a commercial shop vacuum was placed over theextraction point hole. A source of smoke (e.g., smoke tubes), were used at the communication test holes to provide a qualitative assessment of the radius of influence of the extraction point. Results of all communication testing indicated that the soils immediately beneath the slab floors of both buildings was of sufficient porosity, as all communication test results indicated positive movement of the generated smoke into the communication testing points (see Appendix A, Figures 4-7). 3.1 Building 50 and 52 SSD System Design Based upon the results of the communication testing, the SES team determined the preferred SSD system locations in both buildings would successfully accomplish GSAs scope of work. The objective of these installations, two SSD systems in Building 50 and four in Building 52, is to provide sub-slab depressurization to reduce, to the extent practicable, the migration of soil vapor constituents into the buildings. 3.2 Building 50 SSD The two SSD systems proposed for Building 50 consisted of sub-slab vapor extraction 1

System Design and Installation March 2010 systems similar to radon mitigationsystems that are typically installed at residential and commercial structures (see Appendix A, Figures 8 and 9). Upon the results of a positive communication test and the clearance of utilities, the installation of the SSD systems involved the following: Advancing a 6-inch concrete boring bit to a sufficient depth to bore through the existing building floor (approximately 6-inches), Hand-excavate a 10- to 12-inch sump horizontally and vertically, Backfilling each sump with ¾- to 1-inch clean aggregate, Cutting the ceiling penetration, Cutting the roof penetration, Installing a four-inch diameter schedule 40 PVC pipe from the subsurface well-point to an in-line weather-proof radon fan (Fantech HP 190), equipped with a condensation bypass, above the roof surface, Providing electrical power and a switch to the fan, Sealing the roof penetration with a flange and Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) compliant sealant, Sealing the extraction well with an escutcheon and VOC and compliant sealant, Sealing communication test holes with the VOC and compliant sealant, and, Installing a U-Tube manometer, contact labels, and a sampling port on the riser pipe, approximately five feet off of the building floor. The exhaust points were located a sufficient distance from all windows, doors, heating and ventilation systems, and other exhaust points to prevent a reintroduction of extracted constituent vapors. Since the fans were installed on the exterior, Building 50s exhaust points were approximately three feet above the roof surface (see Appendix A, Figure 9, and Appendix B). These setbacks are consistent with common industry standards. 3.3 Building 52 SSD The four SSD systems proposed for Building 52 also consisted of sub-slab vapor extraction systems similar to radon mitigation systems (see Appendix A, Figures 8 and 9). Upon the results of a negative communication test and the clearance of utilities, the installation of the SSD systems involved the following: Advancing a 6-inch concrete boring bit to a sufficient depth to bore through the existing building floor (6- to 12-inches), Hand-excavate a 10- to 12-inch sump horizontally and vertically, Backfilling each sump with ¾- to 1-inch clean aggregate, Cutting the ceiling penetration, Cutting the roof penetration, Installing a four-inch diameter schedule 40 PVC pipe from the subsurface well-point to an in-line weather-proof radon fan (Fantech HP 190), equipped with a condensation bypass, below the roof surface, Providing electrical power and a switch to the fan, Sealing the roof penetration with a booted flange, 2

System Design and Installation March 2010 Sealing the extraction well with an escutcheon and VOC compliant sealant, Sealing communication test holes with the VOC compliant sealant, and, Installing a U-Tube manometer, contact labels, and a sampling port on the riser pipe, approximately five feet off of the building floor. The exhaust points were located a sufficient distance from all windows, doors, heating and ventilation systems, and other exhaust points. Since the fans were installed on the interior, beneath the roof surface, Building 52s exhaust points were approximately one foot vertical off of the roof surface (see Appendix A, Figure 9, and Appendix B). These setbacks are consistent with common industry standards. SSD system component information is presented in Appendix C, and a copy of the project logbook is presented in Appendix D. Upon completion of the installation of the SSD systems, SES visually inspected the U-Tube manometers and observed that all six were successfully operating with a negative pressure. The U-Tube manometer is graduated in water column inches (Inches [In.] H 2 O) of static pressure. SES measured the In. H 2 O for each SSD system from the bottom of the meniscus. Figure 4.1 presents the performance curve for the Fantech HP190 that was installed at all SSD systems. 3

System Design and Installation March 2010 Figure 4.1: Fantech HP190 Performance Curve Notes: In. H O CFM Water Column Inches Cubic Feet per Minute (Source: http://www.fantech.net/radon_h.htm) Using the conversion factor (1.0 Pound per Square Inch [PSI] = 27.7 In. H 2 O), SES calculated each SSD systems PSI employing the following equation: / = PSI Figure 4.2 presents each SSD systems observed manometer reading in In. H 2 O, calculated pressure in PSI, approximate flow in Cubic Feet per Minute (CFM), and the estimated zone of influence (ZI) in square feet (ft 2 ). 4

System Design and Installation March 2010 SSD Figure 4.2: SSD System Performance Table Manometer Reading (In. H O) Pressure (PSI) Flow (CFM) Estimated ZI (ft 2 ) Building 50 SSD-50-01 2.00 0.07 5 1256 SSD-50-02 2.00 0.07 5 1256 Building 52 SSD-52-01 2.00 0.07 5 2826 SSD-52-02 1.75 0.06 20 1256 SSD-52-03 1.75 0.06 20 2826 SSD-52-04 1.50 0.05 45 1256 Notes: SSD In. H O PSI CFM ZI Ft Water Column Inch Pounds per Square Inch Cubic Feet per Minute Zone of Influence Square Feet On February 14, 2010 the SES team conducted a preliminary walk-through, and on February 15, 2010 the SES team conducted the final inspection, with GSA and US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) representatives. SES reviewed the SSD systems design and installation for Buildings 50 and 52. SES indicated good communication was observed at all of the extraction test holes, utilities were avoided during SSD system installation, and no issues negatively impacted SSD system installation. SES also identified the sampling port and explained the U-Tube manometer. SES explained the U-Tube manometer indicated operation and negative pressure only not constituent levels. During both the preliminary and the final construction walk-through, GSA verbally indicated SES completed the SSD system design and installation according to the scope of work. 5

Appendix A FIGURES

SCALE: AS DEPICTED FIGURE 1: PROJECT VICINITY MAP SOURCE: MAPQUEST 6750 Antioch Road, Suite 305 Merriam, Kansas 66204 Phone: (913) 307-0046 Fax: (913) 307-0059 PROJECT BOUNDARY

Proposed SSD-50-02 SSD-50-02 CH Proposed SSD-50-01 SSD-50-01 CH LEGEND Proposed SSD System Location SSD System Location Communication Hole (CH) 10 Radius 20 Radius 30 Radius FIGURE 2: BUILDING 50 SSD SYSTEM CH MAP SOURCE: FILE 6750 Antioch Road, Suite 305Merriam, Kansas 66204 Phone: (913) 307-0046Fax: (913) 307-0059 PROJECT BOUNDARY SCALE: 1 = 25

SSD-52-03 CH SSD-52-034CH Proposed SSD-52-04 Proposed SSD-52-03 Proposed SSD-52-01 SSD-52-01 CH SSD-52-01 CH Proposed SSD-52-02 SSD-52-02 CH LEGEND Proposed SSD System Location SSD System Location Communication Hole (CH) 10 Radius 20 Radius 30 Radius FIGURE 3: BUILDING 52 SSD SYSTEM CH MAP SOURCE: FILE 6750 Antioch Road, Suite 305Merriam, Kansas 66204 Phone: (913) 307-0046Fax: (913) 307-0059 PROJECT BOUNDARY SCALE: 1 = 25

SSD-50-02 SSD-50-01 LEGEND SSD System Location Estimated SSD System Zone of Influence (ZI) 10 Radius 20 Radius 30 Radius FIGURE 4: BUILDING 50 SSDSYSTEM ZI MAP SOURCE: FILE 6750 Antioch Road, Suite 305Merriam, Kansas 66204 Phone: (913) 307-0046Fax: (913) 307-0059 PROJECT BOUNDARY SCALE: 1 = 25

SSD-52-04 SSD-52-03 SSD-52-01 SSD-52-02 LEGEND SSD System Location Estimated SSD System Zone of Influence (ZI) 10 Radius 20 Radius 30 Radius FIGURE 5: BUILDING 52 SSD SYSTEM ZI MAP SOURCE: FILE 6750 Antioch Road, Suite 305Merriam, Kansas 66204 Phone: (913) 307-0046Fax: (913) 307-0059 PROJECT BOUNDARY SCALE: 1 = 25

3 R 12 R SSD-50-02 11 R 7,8,9 10,13 14 2,5 SSD-50-01 4 R 1,6 1 1 R LEGEND SSD System Location Photograph Number Photograph Number (Roof-view) Photograph Direction FIGURE 6: BUILDING 50 PHOTO MAP SOURCE: FILE 6750 Antioch Road, Suite 305Merriam, Kansas 66204 Phone: (913) 307-0046Fax: (913) 307-0059 PROJECT BOUNDARY SCALE: 1 = 25

19 R 31,35 30,32 40 R SSD-52-04 SSD-52-03 34 R 37,41 36,38,39 20 R 23,25,26 SSD-52-01 17,18 15 SSD-52-02 28 R 22 16,21 24,29 27 33 1 1 R LEGEND SSD System Location Photograph Number Photograph Number (Roof-view) Photograph Direction FIGURE 7: BUILDING 52 PHOTO MAP SOURCE: FILE 6750 Antioch Road, Suite 305Merriam, Kansas 66204 Phone: (913) 307-0046Fax: (913) 307-0059 PROJECT BOUNDARY SCALE: 1 = 25

4 SCH 40 PVC Pipe 4 SCH 40 PVC Pipe Escutcheon VOC and CARB Compliant sealant 6 Borehole Existing building floor 10 to 12 Excavation (Horizontal/Vertical) Label 1 (See Details) Label 2 (See Details) U-Tube Manometer Sampling port Label 3 (See Details) ¾ to 1 Clean aggregate Existing soil TYPICAL EXCAVATION TYPICAL RISER FIGURE 8: SSD SYSTEM DRAWINGS SOURCE: FILE 6750 Antioch Road, Suite 305Merriam, Kansas 66204 Phone: (913) 307-0046Fax: (913) 307-0059 SCALE: 1 1

4 SCH 40 PVC Pipe VOC and CARB Compliant sealant Roof flange Existing roof 4 SCH 40 PVC Pipe Fan condensation bypass HP 190 Fan Fan condensation bypass HP 190 Fan Switch VOC and CARB Compliant sealant Roof flange Electrical power Switch Electrical power VOC and CARB Compliant sealant TYPICAL FAN INSTALLATION BUILDING 50 TYPICAL FAN INSTALLATION BUILDING 52 FIGURE 9: SSD SYSTEM DRAWINGS SOURCE: FILE 6750 Antioch Road, Suite 305Merriam, Kansas 66204 Phone: (913) 307-0046Fax: (913) 307-0059 SCALE: 1 1

SUB-SLAB DEPRESSURIZATION SYSTEM INSTALLED BY: SES, INC. 6750 Antioch Road, Suite 305 Merriam, Kansas 66204 FOR SERVICE CALL: (913) 307-0046 SUB-SLAB DEPRESSURIZATION SYSTEM This device monitors the system s vacuum pressure and not constituent levels. Do not alter or disconnect this device. TYPICAL LABEL 1 TYPICAL LABEL 2 SUB-SLAB DEPRESSURIZATION SYSTEM SAMPLING PORT This System has been constructed with an in-line sampling port (threaded plug). Do not use wrenches to tighten hand-tighten only. TYPICAL LABEL 3 FIGURE 10: SSD SYSTEM DETAILS SOURCE: FILE 6750 Antioch Road, Suite 305Merriam, Kansas 66204 Phone: (913) 307-0046Fax: (913) 307-0059

HP190 FAN FIGURE 11: SSD SYSTEM DETAILS SOURCE: FANTECH WEBSITE 6750 Antioch Road, Suite 305Merriam, Kansas 66204 Phone: (913) 307-0046Fax: (913) 307-0059

Appendix B PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG

Direction: NE Direction: E SSD-50-01; Communication Hole Location Photo #: 1 Building 50; Managers Office 13 FEB 2010 SSD-50-01 Installed Photo #: 2 Building 50; Managers Office 14 FEB 2010

Direction: E Direction: NW SSD-50-01; Roof Penetration Location (Exterior) Building 50; Managers Office SSD-50-01; Roof Penetration (Exterior) Building 50; Managers Office Photo #: 3 14 FEB 2010 Photo #: 4 14 FEB 2010

Direction: E Direction: NE SSD-50-01; Installed Building 50; Managers Office SSD-50-01; Patched Communication Hole Building 50; Managers Office Photo #: 5 15 FEB 2010 Photo #: 6 14 FEB 2010

Direction: NW Direction: NW SSD-50-02; Utility and Pipe Bore Location Building 50; Center Cell SSD-50-02; Roof Penetration (Interior) Building 50; Center Cell Photo #: 7 14 FEB 2010 Photo #: 8 14 FEB 2010

Direction: NW Direction: W SSD-50-02; Installed (Cat-Walk View) Photo #: 9 Building 50; Center Cell 14 FEB 2010 SSD-50-02; Installed Photo #: 10 Building 50; Center Cell 14 FEB 2010

Direction: S Direction: E SSD-50-02; Roof Penetration Location (Exterior) Photo #: 11 Building 50; Center Cell 14 FEB 2010 SSD-50-02; Roof Penetration (Exterior) Photo #: 12 Building 50; Center Cell 14 FEB 2010

Direction: W Direction: S SSD-50-02; Installed Photo #: 13 Building 50; Center Cell 15 FEB 2010 SSD-50-02; Patched Communication Hole Photo #: 14 Building 50; Center Cell 14 FEB 2010

Direction: W Direction: W SSD-52-01; Location (Pre-Installation) Photo #: 15 Building 52; Room 7 13 FEB 2010 SSD-52-01; Communication Hole Location Photo #: 16 Building 52; Room 7 13 FEB 2010

Direction: NW Direction: NW SSD-52-01; Installed Photo #: 17 Building 52; Room 7 13 FEB 2010 SSD-52-01; Installed Photo #: 18 Building 52; Room 7 15 FEB 2010