IS DESIGNER RECLAIMED WATER IN NORTH CAROLINA S FUTURE?

Similar documents
2015 Spring Conference

Presentation Outline

Post-Aerobic Digester with Bioaugmentation Pilot Study City of Meridian, ID WWTP PNCWA 2010

BEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND. 1.0 Executive Summary

2.0 Nutrient Removal Alternatives

TAMING TIGERS AND WRESTLING ANACONDAS: PENDER COUNTY COMMERCE PARK WWTP

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT MASTER PLAN 6. BUSINESS CASE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2018

21 st Century Biofilm Reactors TREATING FOR TROUT. Northport/Leelanau Township Wastewater Treatment Facility. Presented by: Rich Grant, PE

Emerging Issues in the Water/Wastewater Industry. Austin s Full-Scale Step-BNR Demonstration

At the Mercy of the Process Impacts of Nitrogen Removal Performance on WWTP Disinfection

City of Redlands Wastewater Treatment Plant. Redlands, CA LOCATION: Carollo Engineers; CH2M HILL MBR MANUFACTURER: COMMENTS:

Nutrient Removal Optimization at the Fairview WWTP

Re Thinking Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal

Presenters: Rodrigo Pena-Lang, PE (D&B Engineers), Magdalena Gasior, PE (D&B Engineers) and Paul D. Smith, PE (NYCDEP)

Facilities Plan. Technical Memorandum No. TM-WW-7 Hydraulic Analysis and Effluent Pump Station

We Know Water. AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) and ANITA Mox Deammonification

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

Bloomingdale WWTF Private/Public Partnership Works. Bob Wilcox, PE Fleis & VandenBrink May 10, 2016

Integrated Fixed Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) System for Additional Nitrification at the Coldwater WWTP

General Operational Considerations in Nutrient and Wet Weather Flow Management for Wastewater Treatment Facilities Part II

City of Elk River Wastewater Treatment Facility Improvements. Achieving Wastewater Treatment Goals

Global Leaders in Biological Wastewater Treatment

Meridian s Class A Recycled Water Program

Efficient Design Configurations for Biological Nutrient Removal

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2014

W O C H H O L Z R E G I O N A L W A T E R R E C L A M A T I O N F A C I L I T Y O V E R V I E W

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2012

Refinery Wastewater Process Modeling with GPS-X

OWEA Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Upgrading WRFs for Biological Nutrient Removal. June 25, 2015

Membrane Bio-Reactors (MBRs) The Future of Wastewater Technology, Science and Economy Aspects

We Know Water. AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) and ANITA Mox Deammonification

Town of Robbinsville Constructs Cheoah River BNR Wastewater Treatment Facility to Meet New Nitrogen and Phosphorus Permit Limits

International Joint Commission Water & Wastewater Treatment Best Management Practices Forum Monday, March 26, 2012 Wayne State University, Detroit MI

Altoona Westerly Wastewater Treatment Facility BNR Conversion with Wet Weather Accommodation

Membrane BioReactor: Technology for Waste Water Reclamation

SECTION 8.0 NEWPCC SECOND PRIORITY CONTROL ALTERNATIVES

Dipankar Sen, PhD, PE Santa Clara Valley Water District Professor, Virginia Tech Civil & Env Engr

Performance Evaluation of the Moores Creek Advanced Water Resource Recovery Facility

DEVELOPMENT OF THE. Ken Mikkelson, Ph.D. Ed Lang Lloyd Johnson, P.E. Aqua Aerobic Systems, Inc.

RMSAWWA/RMWEA Joint Technical Advisory Committee Presentation and Tour

Dealing with Unexpected Wastewater Treatment Plant Disruptions. February 16, 2017

Palmer Wastewater Treatment Plant Environmental Impacts. A summary of the impacts of this treatment alternative are listed below:

Review of WEFTEC 2016 Challenge & Overview of 2017 Event. Malcolm Fabiyi, PhD, MBA Spencer Snowling, PhD. P.Eng

NEWEA 2015 Annual Conference Session 16

Refinement of Nitrogen Removal from Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants

Appendix D JWPCP Background and NDN

Process Monitoring for Biological and Chemical Nutrient Removal

Town of North Castle, NY Sewer District No. 2 WWTP

Biological Phosphorus Removal Technology. Presented by: Eugene Laschinger, P.E.

We Know Water. AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) and ANITA Mox Deammonification

SECTION 9.0 SEWPCC SECOND PRIORITY CONTROL ALTERNATIVES

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

COMPARISON OF SBR AND CONTINUOUS FLOW ACTIVATED SLUDGE FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL

ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF OXIDATION DITCHES. Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E., DEE Professor of Environmental Engineering The University of Memphis

Regional Municipality of Halton Skyway Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Study

Waste water treatment

OBG WASTE MANAGEMENT PRESENTS: 18 th Annual New England Pretreatment Coordinators Workshop (October 27, 2016) Landfill Leachate Overview Mark Greene,

WASTEWATER TREATMENT MASTER PLAN SUPPLEMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CSR Process Simulations Can Help Municipalities Meet Stringent Nutrient Removal Requirements

The TRA CRWS Master Plan. Past, Present, & Future of CRWS. Kaylee Dusek, EIT, Garver Matt Jalbert, PE, TRA

Baltimore City Department of Public Works

BLACK & VEATCH CORPORATION NISP EIS SUPPORT. Carl Brouwer, Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District

Treatment Optimization: What s

RE ENGINEERING O&M PRACTICES TO GET NITROGEN & PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITHOUT FACILITY UPGRADES

QUINCY 1WATER UTILITY TDS CONTROL. Lloyd Emil Voges Brown and Caldwell 701 Pike St. Suite 1200 Seattle, WA

ISAM SBR with Blower Assisted Jet Aeration Design Calculations For Lyons, CO WWTP Upgrade

A Critical New Look at Nutrient Removal Processes

WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM

Coupling Trickling Filter or RBC s with Activated Sludge

Liquid Waste Management Plan Technical Memorandum

Wet Weather and Advanced Treatment: Procurement Strategies to Secure the Right Technology

<1ppm Phosphorus A BNR With No Chemical Addition Case Study

AS-H Iso-Disc Cloth Media Filter

James Winslade Instructor, Environmental Resources Training Center Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville

WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT. Bentonville Wastewater Treatment Plant Facts:

2015 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.

Utilization of Dynamic Modeling to Evaluate and Design Secondary Clarifiers for the Muddy Creek WWTP

SeRVice: Wastewater Treatment

By Jack Wendler/Ripon WWTF

How Detroit Lakes Is Tackling Stringent New Wastewater Regulations

Sludge recycling (optional) Figure Aerobic lagoon

NEW SOLUTION FOR PRIMARY WASTEWATER TREATMENT; CLOTH MEDIA FILTRATION

Aqua MSBR MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

Secondary Treatment Process Control

UDWQ POTW Nutrient Removal Cost Impact Study: Analysis of Tremonton City Wastewater Treatment Plant

Watertown Wastewater Facility Plan. August 11, 2015

Upgrading Lagoons to Remove Ammonia, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus *nutrient removal in cold-climate lagoon systems

SECTION 2.0 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

THE SEQUENCED AERATION PROCESS MONTAGUE, MASSACHUSETTS

Aeration System Improvements with a 5-Year Payback. Scott Phipps

CHARLES RIVER POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT Capital Improvement Plan

RESTRICTED URBAN REUSE OF KONYA (TURKEY) MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EFFLUENTS VIA RECLAIMED WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

Advantages & Applications of MBBR Technologies

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY TO IMPLEMENT A REUSE WATER PROGRAM. Stefan Haecker*, John Healy** 9311 College Parkway, Suite 1 Fort Myers Florida 33919

General Information on Nitrogen

WEFTEC.06. **Cobb County Water System, Marietta, Georgia

Copies: Mark Hildebrand (NCA) ARCADIS Project No.: April 10, Task A 3100

Choices to Address Filamentous Growth

Transcription:

IS DESIGNER RECLAIMED WATER IN NORTH CAROLINA S FUTURE? Alan E. Rimer PhD, P.E. DEE Vice President, Director of Water Reuse EnviroTechNovations LLC AlanRimer@Outlook.com Substituting for Edmund Kobylinski P.E. Sade Olapade-Olaopa CEng MIChemE Senior Process Specialist Black & Veatch Olapade-OlaopaS@bv.com

INTRODUCTION

WATER RESOURCES IN NORTH CAROLINA NC is the 9 th most populous state Current population on 7-1-17 was estimated to be 10,310,371 residents Three metro areas constitute 60% of state population Charlotte Metro Area Greensboro/Winston Salem Metro Area Research Triangle Area

WATER RESOURCES IN NORTH CAROLINA (CONTINUED) Two of these metro areas are located at the headwaters of three major river basins Charlotte Metro Area Greensboro/Winston Salem Area Research Triangle Area

FIT FOR PURPOSE RECLAIMMED WATER PRODUCTION

FIT FOR PURPOSE RECLAIMED WATER OR DESIGNER RECLAIMED WATER Creating designer reclaimed water may have elevated levels of nutrients for crop or landscape irrigation Typical reclaimed water is low in solids and nutrients and may be sufficient for cooling tower use. Some plants can produce highly treated reclaimed water for industrial use (RO quality water for example)

TREATMENT - GENERAL Secondary/Tertiary treatment to meet effluent discharge requirements may involve expensive operations such as nitrification/denitrification and biological or chemical phosphorus removal Running a similar system without having to meet stringent effluent requirements can save money (chemicals, energy, etc.) and produce a nutrient rich product for irrigation The issue is that most plants must meet both requirements because customers may not demand reclaimed water for irrigation year round, but effluent discharge requirements require low nutrient discharge

HOW TO SERVE TWO MASTERS Nitrification is controlled by managing the system SRT If the nitrifiers are wasted, the sludge age decreases and the nitrogen content in the effluent increases Ah, but the converse is not true it may take 2-3 weeks for nitrifiers to restart nitrification and it is temperature sensitive Under these conditions a single train system is not flexible Operating experience indicates an activated sludge system should be run between 1,500 and 3,000 mg/l MLSS Can a WWTP operate at a lesser MLSS concentration and prevent nitrification?

EXPERIENCE AT A MID-WESTERN PLANT The answer is YES

WHAT ABOUT PHOSPHORUS? If a facility is practicing Biological phosphorus removal (BPR) Simply make the anaerobic zones not anaerobic However, restarting BPR is not as simple as turning the BPR switch to "on. It may take several weeks to reestablish good phosphorus accumulating organisms (PAO) populations There are lots of operating considerations To meet Regulatory requirements for discharge Plan Ahead! It will take several weeks to get Nitrifiers and BPR working again Customer and Utility communication is essential

WHY CAN'T WE MAKE DESIGNER RECLAIMED WATER YEAR-ROUND It is certainly possible to make nutrient rich reclaimed water year-round and never have to discharge the reclaimed train effluent to the permitted outfall There are two considerations Unpredictable weather conditions (Here in the East Coast that is nor'easter's and hurricanes Algal growth in the reservoirs due to high nutrient concentrations Phosphorus is generally considered the culprit here and often needs to be removed before long-term storage

OTHER SYSTEMS HAVE THEIR CHALLENGES Fixed film systems such as MBBRs and BAF are replacing trickling filters(which are fading into the sunset) MBBRs can be designed for nitrification and denitrification with relative ease. However bringing the MBBR system back into nitrification and denitrification is very similar to restarting an activated sludge system BAF systems can be configured in a variety of different ways Both systems must use chemical phosphorus removal

ECONOMICS OF PRODUCING HIGH NUTRIENT EFFLUENT An old rule of : when progressing from only BOD removal to nitrification, double the aerator capacity Turning off some blowers to produce a higher nitrogen concentrations in the effluent saves $ Chemical costs are reduced

YORK ONTARIO EXAMPLE York is a suburb (region) of the province of Ontario A 40 MLD (10 MGD) WRRF is being designed to meet a 0.02 mg/l annual effluent phosphorus concentration The treatment train is illustrated in the following figure

YORK RECLAIMED WATER TREATMENT TRAIN Chlorination Customer Partial Biological Treatment Bypass Reclaimed Water Bulk Loading Cloth Disk Filters UV Disinfection Headworks Primary Clarifier Chem Feed & Biological Treatment Secondary Clarifier Storage Pond and Tree Farm

DESIGNER WATER PRODUCTION 2 of the 4 biological treatment trains are designed to allow the a portion of the train to be used for short SRT operation in the summer Trains can be isolated, allowing the plant operators to manage two totally independent systems Reclaimed water is to be produced during the irrigation system (May to October) The utility also has forested land; snow machines produce snow allowing reclaimed water to be produced/used year round Headworks Partial Biological Treatment Bypass Primary Clarifier Chem Feed & Biological Treatment Secondary Clarifier

A NORTH CAROLINA EXAMPLE The town of Cary has been producing reclaimed water since 2001and was the 1st such system in the state The most recent addition to the facilities producing reclaimed water is the Western Wake Regional Water Reclamation Facility

RECLAIMED WATER USE Reclaimed use in Cary Commercial irrigation (27%) and cooling tower/toilets (13% ) are the major non-plant bulk uses Single Family Irrigation - 13% Multi-Family Irrigation - 2% Cooling Tower/Toilet - 13% Commercial Irrigation - 27% Plant/Bulk Use - Typical Reclaimed Water facilities generally all provide for these uses But in this paper we are suggesting it well might be possible to modify the WWRWRF to produce designer reclaimed water

WWRWRF MODIFICATIONS Design effluent: 18 MGD capacity, and most recently discharging a BOD5 of 2.5 mg/l and a TSS of 2.5 mg/l using VIP process If the plant were modified, the VIP process certainly lends itself to more modifications as previously described in other plants There are a sufficient number of filters that could be isolated so that one train could produce more nutrient rich reclaimed water for irrigation and the other train could be used to produce reclaimed water from the unmodified VIP process for other uses

CONCLUSIONS

WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED? The state is growing rapidly and the major metro areas will need to look to alternative water supplies Reclaimed wastewater can fill that portion of the water resources portfolio Utilities and designers water reclamation Facilities should evaluate the potential for creating biological and tertiary treatment methods which can produce a variety of different reclaimed waters A variety of treatment options are available to meet these needs

QUESTIONS QUESTIONS