Are Net Zero Buildings too Expensive?

Similar documents
Multifamily Net Zero Retrofit Market: Technical and Cost Benchmarks for San Francisco

Carbon Neutral 60% 70% 80% 90% Today

High Performance Schools The Kentucky Experience

Be Aggressive About the Passive Solutions

Solar Photovoltaic Training

Explain key terms, programs, standards ASHRAE 90.1 ENERGY DOE average energy use

Solar Photovoltaic Training

OSU Cascades Net Zero Campus. Recommendations

ZNE Buildings and the Grid: Least Cost Pathways for Every Building

Reimagining Campus Utilities into a Sustainable Future Getting the Project Going. October 2016

Net-Zero Energy in Single Family Residential Projects: Leveraging Sefaira Concept to Design High Efficiency Affordable Housing

EA PREREQUISITE 2: MINIMUM ENERGY PERFORMANCE

Bringing Savings to Life: Net-Zero Design and Performance Bill Maclay, Maclay Architects Andy Shapiro, Energy Balance, Inc.

Welcome / Bienvenue. RETScreen Training Institute RETScreen 101 Introduction to Clean Energy Project Analysis

Benefits of Green Buildings. Government Finance Officers Association of Texas April 2014

IPD for Zero Energy Buildings

Novato Unified School District

Finding Pennsylvania s Solar Future. 5 th Stakeholder Meeting March 8, 2018 Pittsburgh

Demystifying Rooftop Solar

Energy Assessment Report Clayville Elementary School DRAFT October George Washington Highway, Clayville, RI DRAFT

EA PREREQUISITE 2: MINIMUM ENERGY PERFORMANCE Project # SFPUC Administration Office Building

Energy Efficiency, GeoExchange Systems and Renewable Energy MiAPPA Winter 2010

DLR Group is ranked #1 by ARCHITECT, the official publication of the American Institute of Architects, in its 2012 ARCHITECT 50 ranking of U.S.

Westbrook House Annual Utility Data. Table 1. Westbrook House Utility Use. 2,713 sf, 3 people

Rich Lundeen, AIA, LEEP AP & Tim Wipperfurth, PE, LEED AP Mead & Hunt, Inc Watts Road Madison, WI

Building Trek: The Next Big Thing in Energy Performance Course Number: CXENERGY1623

23-28 = -5. Zero Net Energy Case Study WEST BERKELEY PUBLIC LIBRARY OVERVIEW. Planning & Design Approach. Measured Energy Stats

Reducing Energy Usage by 50% Overview of the Advanced Energy Design Guides

THE FUTURE IS HERE: New Homes, New Codes and Net Zero Living

Energy Systems for Island Resilience Case Study : Guam

Speakers. Scott Shell, AIA, LEED AP Principal EHDD Architecture Principal-in-Charge

How Rigorous Planning and Effective Design Help Hit Ultra Low Energy Goals

NREL Commercial Buildings Research

= Verified Zero Net Energy Building Case Study BAGATELOS ARCHITECTURAL GLASS SYSTEMS MANUFACTURING FACILITY OVERVIEW

Solar Photovoltaic Training

Solar Energy Today s Clean Energy Choice

Solar Architecture re in Minnesota:

Solar 101: What California Community Colleges Need to Know About Going Solar ACBO Spring Conference May 24, 2016

2015 Vermont s Greenest Building Awards. Project Entry Form

Comparing the Carbon Emission Reductions from Various Clean Energy Projects

Deep Energy Savings in Existing Buildings

Energy Codes and Solar Moving Forward Together. Joe Cain, P.E. Solar Energy Industries Association

Building Energy. Efficiency Standards Building Energy. ZNE Strategy. Building Standards Office:

5/8/2018. PHIUS+ 2018: What s New? Graham S. Wright. More nuance for different building types. Supports our overall transition to renewable energy.

Getting to Net Zero. PV and the Electrical Grid The Bullitt Center. September 17, PRESENTED TO: NASEO Getting to Net Zero National Forum

Making Super-Efficiency Affordable: A Story of a Near-Zero Net Energy Multifamily Development

EA PREREQUISITE 2: MINIMUM ENERGY PERFORMANCE

Successful Strategies for. Designing Net-Zero Energy Campuses

Wolf Penn Net Zero Demonstration Home Drew Benado Greg Davenport Krisann Parks

THERMAL STORAGE SOLUTIONS WHITEPAPER

Mandatory Solar in New Home Construction. Case Study

SUSTAINABLE SCHOOLS Roots for a New Generation: How Manitoba Schools are Reaping the Benefits of LEED

One That is Already Built.

Emerging Technologies & Benefits of Solar PV

GREEN BUILDINGS Innovative Urban Solutions

Architectural Integration of Solar PV into Building Design

SUSTAINABILITY An Energy & Emissions Case Study

Green Building: Today s Practices Tomorrow s Challenges

Nothing Beats Zero. Updates on the Trends and Projects that are Getting to Zero Energy. Thanks to our valued sponsors and partners: 3/6/2018

Green Buildings Make Cents

PRESENTERS: Chris Madden & Nils Blomquist

US building impacts. 72% electricity consumption 39% energy use 38% CO 2 emissions 40% raw materials 30% waste output 14% potable water use

Municipal Green Building Policy

PASSIVE HOUSE IN STUDENT HOUSING

CLARK BROCKMAN, SERA ARCHITECTS

Green Retrofit. Why you should consider it, what it means, and how to get it done

Net Zero Building Commissioning. Phillip Saieg, CEM, LEED AP O+M Josh Harwood

The CSI Site. Research Studies. Value? Depends on who you are: How to Determine the Value of a Solar Investment

San Bernardino Community College Zero Net Energy at the District Office and Applied Technology Training Center

Building Load, Solar PV and Energy Storage Performance Assessment

SOLAR & ENERGY EFFICIENCY FOR HOLLYWOOD RIVIERA HOMEOWNERS

Reducing Built Environment Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Thurston County. Summary January 2016

SDG&E New Construction Process Evaluation Study Report

How to Get it Done. New Construction Incentives

Value? Depends on who you are: The CSI Site

Sustainable Building Operations & Upgrades

2014 ENERGY REPORT. Mark J. Ferguson, P.E. Campus Operations & Plant Manager

Net Zero Energy Installations

2030 Challenge & Zero Energy Buildings Ashley McGraw Architects, P.C.

2013 ENERGY REPORT MARK J. FERGUSON, P.E. CAMPUS ENERGY MANAGER 1125 GLEN AVENUE COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80905

Renewable Energy Update. Sustainability/Energy Committee April 22, 2014

Solar power in action

A Net Zero Culture Starts with People

for Main Street Businesses Eileen Westervelt, PE CEM SEDAC

USGBC National Capital Region MasterClass Series: The Ins and Outs of Existing Building Commissioning Analysis Credit

ACEEE National Symposium on Market Transformation

Responding to Climate Change Imperative: Reducing Energy Use & Operating Costs with ENERGY STAR

No More Easy Refills: The Move from Prescriptions to Performance Codes

Walk-Don t Run. Steps to Change Sustainable Designs into. "Net Zero Buildings Designs"

DC Surface (non-submersible) pumps are most economical. Reduce pumping energy by half

Energy Conservation Measure Development Identify, Screen, and Analyze

Re: College of Lake County: AB Wing HVAC Remodeling Programming Mtg #3 Architect s Project Number: Meeting Minutes

Summary of Net Metered Projects as of June 30, Small Net Metered Projects as of 6/30/2016 Small Group Host Projects as of 6/30/2016

Toward Zero Energy Commercial Buildings: The Role of the Utility

Roof mounted solar panels on Bldg L, Verde Valley Campus. 1. One developed Acre can produce approx 100 KW of peak solar power.

Transforming the Built Environment On the Path to Zero Energy Buildings

What s My Baseline? ASHRAE

FORECASTING PV MARKET ADOPTION AND DEMAND IMPACTS

ENSURING A PRODUCTIVE ENERGY MODELING PROCESS

Strategies for measuring and reducing your carbon footprint

Transcription:

10/19/2016 Are Net Zero Buildings too Expensive? Getting to Zero National Forum October 12-14, 2016 Bill Maclay, AIA, LEED AP, Principal Maclay Architects "Cropped Earth with Sunburst" by NASA 1

Maclay Architects Path to Net Zero Baer Zomeworks 1971 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2014 Solar experimentation Energy Conservation IAQ Healthy Bldg Microload NZ Bldg NZ Communities + Planet Maclay Architects Net Zero Focus 2

Maclay Architects Net Zero and Net Zero Ready Projects EUI 9 EUI 10 EUI 7 EUI 18 EUI 17 EUI 18 EUI 17 EUI 16 EUI 19 EUI 33 EUI 19 EUI 77 *Dining Hall with process loads The Putney School Field House 3

The Putney School Field House Net Zero since 2011 BUILDING TYPE: Net-zero wellness center SCOPE: New Building PROCESS: Community Design Choices in Sustainability New Financial Paradigm PROJECT SIZE: Phase 17,500 sf PROJECT COST: $4,200,000 COST/SQFT: $241/sf ENERGY INTENSITY (without renewables): 9.6 kbtu/sf ENERGY INTENSITY (with renewables): 0 kbtu/sf PERCENT RENEWABLE: 100% AIR INFILTRATION: 0.065 cfm/sf LEED RATING: LEED-NB Platinum anticipated The Putney School Field House Net Zero since 2011 BUILDING Financial TYPE: paradigm Net-zero shift wellness center SCOPE: New Building PROCESS: Community Design Choices in Sustainability New Financial Paradigm PROJECT SIZE: Phase 17,500 sf PROJECT COST: $4,200,000 COST/SQFT: $241/sf ENERGY INTENSITY (without renewables): 9.6 kbtu/sf ENERGY INTENSITY (with renewables): 0 kbtu/sf PERCENT RENEWABLE: 100% AIR INFILTRATION: 0.065 cfm/sf LEED RATING: LEED-NB Platinum anticipated 4

The Putney School Field House Net Zero since 2011 BUILDING Financial TYPE: paradigm Net-zero shift wellness center SCOPE: Net New Zero Design BuildingStrategy PROCESS: Community Design Choices in Sustainability New Financial Paradigm PROJECT SIZE: Phase 17,500 sf PROJECT COST: $4,200,000 COST/SQFT: $241/sf ENERGY INTENSITY (without renewables): 9.6 kbtu/sf ENERGY INTENSITY (with renewables): 0 kbtu/sf PERCENT RENEWABLE: 100% AIR INFILTRATION: 0.065 cfm/sf LEED RATING: LEED-NB Platinum anticipated SF: 16,800 The Net Putney Zero since School 2011 Field House BUILDING Financial TYPE: paradigm Net-zero shift wellness center Choices in Sustainability SCOPE: Net New Zero Design BuildingStrategy New Financial Paradigm PROCESS: Community Design PROJECT SIZE: Phase 17,500 sf PROJECT COST: $4,200,000 COST/SQFT: $241/sf ENERGY INTENSITY (without renewables): 9.6 kbtu/sf ENERGY INTENSITY (with renewables): 0 kbtu/sf PERCENT RENEWABLE: 100% AIR INFILTRATION: 0.065 cfm/sf LEED RATING: LEED-NB Platinum anticipated 5

The Putney School Field House Net Zero since 2011 BUILDING Financial TYPE: paradigm Net-zero shift wellness center SCOPE: Net New Zero Design BuildingStrategy PROCESS: Community Design SF: 16,800 EUI: 9 kbtu/sf-yr (actual) Choices in Sustainability New Financial Paradigm PROJECT SIZE: Phase 17,500 sf PROJECT COST: $4,200,000 COST/SQFT: $241/sf ENERGY INTENSITY (without renewables): 9.6 kbtu/sf ENERGY INTENSITY (with renewables): 0 kbtu/sf PERCENT RENEWABLE: 100% AIR INFILTRATION: 0.065 cfm/sf LEED RATING: LEED-NB Platinum anticipated The Putney School Field House Net Zero since 2011 BUILDING Financial TYPE: paradigm Net-zero shift wellness center SCOPE: Net New Zero Design BuildingStrategy PROCESS: Community Design PROJECT SIZE: Phase 17,500 sf PROJECT COST: $4,200,000 COST/SQFT: $241/sf ENERGY INTENSITY (without renewables): 9.6 kbtu/sf ENERGY INTENSITY (with renewables): 0 kbtu/sf PERCENT RENEWABLE: 100% AIR INFILTRATION: 0.065 cfm/sf LEED RATING: LEED-NB Platinum anticipated SF: 16,800 EUI: 9 kbtu/sf-yr (actual) EUI Choices with renewables: in Sustainability 0 kbtu/sf-yr New Financial Paradigm 6

7

Building Performance Options Energy Options 8

Integrated Design Net Zero Strategy RENEWABLES MINIMIZE ENERGY LOADS - = NET ZERO - = 9

What Is Net Zero Ready? MINIMIZED ENERGY LOADS NET - ZERO = NO RENEWABLES READY - = Fuel Mileage for Buildings? Public Domain Photo by B Photo by Reinraum Energy ull-doser / public domain Use Intensity (EUI) 10

Net Zero Building Metrics PERFORMANCE METRICS 10-25 EUI kbtu/sf *without process loads PRESCRIPTIVE METRICS Maximum 0.1 cfm/sf above grade surface area@ 50 Pascals Maclay Architects US Climate Zones Optimum Prescriptive measures will vary in zones 1-4 11

Key Elements Conservation + High-Efficient + Systems Renewables Maclay Architects Energy Use Intensity (EUI) Heat Pumps (COP 2.3-3.0) Maclay Architects Usually Photovoltaics (sized for annual load) Best Investment Today $5-$20/sf Capital Cost 12

Best Investment Today $5-$20/sf Capital Cost 3-10% of Construction Cost Best Investment Today $5-$20/sf Capital Cost 3-10% of Construction Cost Solar Financing 13

Best Investment Today $5-$20/sf Capital Cost 3-10% of Construction Cost Solar Financing Envelope + ROI Best Investment Today $5-$20/sf Capital Cost 3-10% of Construction Cost Solar Financing Envelope + ROI Heat Pumps + ROI 14

Best Investment Today $5-$20/sf Capital Cost 3-10% of Construction Cost Solar Financing Envelope + ROI Heat Pumps + ROI Renewables + ROI Financial Analysis Methodology INPUTS Energy Consumption Increased Capital Costs for Efficiency Capital Cost for PV Financing Assumptions OUTCOMES Capital and operating costs Cash Flow 15

Single Family Home 1,600 sf $16/sf Additional construction costs $14/sf additional solar costs Financial Analysis Energy Consumption INPUTS: Energy Model Energy Usage, kwh/yr 16

Financial Analysis Increased Net Zero Ready Cost INPUTS Capital costs for Net Zero over Code Financial Analysis Increased Net Zero Ready Cost INPUTS Capital costs for Net Zero over Code 17

Financial Analysis Increased Net Zero Ready Cost INPUTS Capital costs for Net Zero over Code Financial Analysis Financial Assumptions INPUTS Interest Rate Loan Duration Fuel Escalation Rate Image: Vermont Fuel Price 2003-2014 18

Single Family 30-year Costs CODE New Single Family NET ZERO Solar Costs Additional Building Costs Single Family 30-year Costs Interest Costs CODE New Single Family NET ZERO 19

Single Family 30-year Costs Energy Costs CODE New Single Family NET ZERO Single Family 30-year Costs CODE New Single Family NET ZERO 20

Single Family 30-year Costs $72,000 savings w/ Federal Tax Credit CODE New Single Family NET ZERO 30-Year Cash Flow 30-Year savings CUMULATIVE SAVINGS OF NET ZERO ABOVE CODE $60,000 Cumulative Savings 21

30-Year Cash Flow Savings after 30 years CUMULATIVE SAVINGS OF NET ZERO ABOVE CODE $60,000 PLUS FREE SOLAR Cumulative Savings Bennington Courthouse and State Office Building 65,000 SF Renovation/Addition 22

Bennington Courthouse and State Office Building 65,000 SF Renovation/Addition $6 / sf additional cost Bennington Courthouse and State Office Building 65,000 SF Renovation/Addition $6 / sf additional cost 3% additional construction cost 23

EUI Comparison and Metrics Energy Use Intensity Comparison (kbtu/sf-yr) Typical Existing Office Existing Facility Code Compliant Net Zero Ready (actual) 92 113 39 26 EUI Comparison and Metrics Energy Use Intensity Comparison (kbtu/sf-yr) Typical Existing Office Existing Facility Code Compliant Net Zero Ready (actual) 92 113 39 26 Percent Improvement for Net Zero Ready 254% 335% 50% 0% 24

Cost estimate- Total Additional Capital Cost Maclay Architects 20-year Present Value Financial Analysis 20 Year Present Value of Operating and Additional Capital Costs for Energy Improvements $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4 Million Savings $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,182,000 $2,891,000 $1,766,000 $750,000 Savings $0 Existing Building Code Compliant $372,000 NetZero Ready Additional Construction Cost NPV of Operating Costs Maclay Architects 25

Cumulative Savings of Net Zero Ready vs Code Savings = $750,000 ROI =13% Maclay Architects 26

Renewable NRG Systems Model Renewable Office and Manufacturing Facility photo by Carolyn Bates www.carolynbates.com Renewable NRG Systems Model Renewable Office and Manufacturing Facility SF: 77,000 sf photo by Carolyn Bates www.carolynbates.com 27

Renewable NRG Systems Model Renewable Office and Manufacturing Facility SF: 77,000 sf EUI: 18 kbtu/sf/yr (actual) photo by Carolyn Bates www.carolynbates.com Renewable NRG Systems Model Renewable Office and Manufacturing Facility SF: 77,000 sf EUI: 18 kbtu/sf/yr (actual) EUI w/ Renewables: 11 kbtu/sf-yr photo by Carolyn Bates www.carolynbates.com 28

300,000 SF Mixed Use Masterplan Net Zero Energy Feasibility Study In partnership with Energy Balance, Inc. 29

Net Zero Masterplan 2.3 MW of PV to be NZ Rooftops and carports maximized + 3 acres of ground mounted Community Residential 30-Year Costs NZ cumulative savings of $3.8 million including PV tax credits With 30% Federal Tax Credit for PV 30

Community Commercial 20-Year Costs Office and Manufacturing NZ with the federal tax credit saves $4.8 million over 20 years With 30% Federal Tax Credit for PV Operating Costs Finance Interest Finance Interest PV Costs So why isn t everyone doing this? 31

Paradigm Shift Payback v. Cash Flow Payback Cash Flow Achievable photo by Jim Westphalen 32

Affordable photo by Carolyn Bates www.carolynbates.com Beautiful Photo by Robert Benson 33

10/19/2016 The time is NOW Thank you Bill Maclay, AIA, LEED AP, Author, Principal Maclay Architects bill@maclayarchitects.com 34