PHASE 1 OF THE CONSENT DECREE/ WET WEATHER IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS THROUGH 2017

Similar documents
LICK RUN WATERSHED MASTER PLAN. Community Design Workshop #1 August 11, 2011

The Case for Operational Optimization

Kings Run Project Public Meeting. July 31, 2014

MSD Integrated Watershed Management Planning Approach to Achieve Sustainable Communities

NJ Future CSO Permittee Meeting

IIoT Transformation of Cincinnati MSD Collection System

This page is blank to facilitate double-sided printing.

Sanitary Sewer Rates Now and in the Future

Progressive Solutions for a Historic Watershed

Lower Mill Creek Partial Remedy. Alternatives Evaluation Preliminary Findings Report

Sanitation District No.1 Cost Effectively Reduces Overflows Into the Ohio River

Integrated Long Term Control Plan Targeted Inflow Reduction for CSO Control. OWEA Conference June 29, 2016

City of Columbus Wet Weather Management Plan Update. Dax J. Blake, P.E. Administrator City of Columbus, Ohio Division of Sewerage and Drainage

Legal Context for Green Infrastructure Under the Clean Water Act

Blueprint Columbus. Clean Streams. Strong Neighborhoods.

The Metropolitan District Status of LTCP Update. January 9, 2017

Werk & Westbourne Enhanced High Rate Treatment Facility. Find a better graphic for here. Community Information Meeting October 22, 2015

Executive Summary. Introduction

LEVEL 3 PROJECT REPORTS. Wet Weather Improvement Plan Projects and Bundles. Planning Phase

March 1, 2012 Presentation to: Ohio WEA

Hamilton County, Ohio

City of Oregon Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Secondary Treatment Improvement Project Phases 1 & 2 FAQ Sheet

Integrated Catchment Modelling

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Omaha s Combined Sewer Overflow Control Program. May 22, 2007 South High School

Omaha CSO Program and the South Omaha Industrial Area Lift Station, Force Main and

Green City, Clean Waters

DEP Issues Request for Proposals to Develop Green Infrastructure Master Plans and Designs in Three Combined Sewer Areas

Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District Conveyance and Treatment System. MACRO made available by

The Sewer Authority of the City of Scranton Scranton, PA

MSDGC MODELING GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS VOLUME I SYSTEM WIDE MODEL

Long-Term Control Plan Orientation. July 1, 2009

Hydraulic Modeling of Deep Tunnel Provides Cost Savings

Deep Dive: Water Treatment. Greg Heitzman, Louisville Metro Sewer District

Green Infrastructure Performance in NYC

Will Your Green Infrastructure Program Help You Comply with Your Consent Order?

Maximizing Your Investment

Improvements to the Missouri River Wastewater Treatment Plant- Schedule BProject. Public Meeting June 4, 2013 South Omaha Public Library

SESWA. Source Control Measures to Improve Water Quality

APPENDIX A - INTEGRATED PLAN PRIORITIZED PROJECT LIST

LIMITED ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District, Southerly Electrical Infrastructure Improvements SEII/1401A

City of Columbus Update

OWEA Annual Conference Options for Solids and Floatables Control

OEPA CSO Overflow Reporting

Omaha s Combined Sewer Overflow Control Program. May 17, 2007 Lewis & Clark Middle School

Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District. Rate Proposal Overview

Pre-Program Work. Omaha CSO Control Program. Agenda. City has worked on addressing CSOs for many years

2013 Georgia Association of. Conference Lake Lanier Islands, Georgia

Sewage Overflows in the Detroit River. Photo Credit: Bob Burns, Detroit Riverkeeper

Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District. CSO LTCP Update EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT:

Comprehensive Sustainability Plan for NYC

Municipal Sanitary Authority of the City of New Kensington

Foster Park Retrieval Shaft

Controlling CSO Discharges in the City of Toronto: Don River and Central Waterfront Project

Green Infrastructure. Jesse Schomberg University of Minnesota Sea Grant Program

MONTHLY PROJECT REPORTS. As of November 30, Muddy Creek Watershed

Turning a Negative into a Positive Negotiating a Consent Decree to Develop a Reasonable Endpoint

Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District Infrastructure Upgrades Overview. Wet Weather Team Stakeholder Group Meeting July 20, 2006

Tunnel Works. How we got here - Fort Wayne s Consent Decree. Tunnel Works Program Frequently Asked Questions

MONTHLY PROJECT REPORTS. As of April 30, Muddy Creek Watershed

COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOWS (CSO) FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Bioswales, Wetlands, and Trees: How going green can be a part of a Wet Weather Management Plan. Presented by Brian Tornes, PE

WHAT IS GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE?

Wilmette - Background

December 20, MMSD Contract No: M03002P01 MMSD File Code: M009PE000.P7400

Using SWMM EXTRAN to Simulate WWTP Hydraulics

Somerset Raritan Valley Sewerage Authority SSO Abatement and Storm Control Treatment Facility

Assessing SWMM 5 Hydrologic Parameter Benefits for Model Calibration

Lesson W9 Wastewater and CSOs

WEF Collection Systems Conference 2017

The Business of Clean Water. Bringing private sector leadership to water quality in Baltimore

DC Clean Rivers Project

Synergy: Addressing Combined Sewer Overflows and Nitrogen

KANSAS CITY S OVERFLOW CONTROL PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORT Reporting Period: January 1 to December 31, 2015

Consent Decree Overview. July 9, 2008

SOS. City of Akron Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Long Term Control Plan. Separate Our Sewers Save Our Streams. Ohio OWEA Collection Systems Workshop

MSD Water Quality Monitoring and Modeling

Chapter 5: Conveyance Assessment 2020 Baseline Conditions

EPA Consent Decree Annual Informational Meeting Integrated Plan/Regional Wet Weather Management Plan. January 22, 2019

WASHINGTON SUBURBAN SANITARY COMMISSION BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES ASSOCIATED WITH WSSC S CONSENT DECREE FOR SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOW

GREAT MIAMI WASTEWATER SYSTEM PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP OPPORTUNITY WITH RUMPKE

SSO 700 Integrated Watershed Action Plan: Development of a Water Quality Sampling Program

Cincinnati s SWMM Model: A Journey Through Time

MONTHLY PROJECT REPORTS. As of January 31, Muddy Creek Watershed

Chapter 4 TMACOG Areawide Water Quality Management 208 Plan 4-116

Management of Aging Wastewater Infrastructure -- Challenges and Strategies --

Sewer Separation and Stormwater Management (with Emphasis on Flood Control)

Springfield, MO SSO Control Program: Using Big Data to Chart Progress

Problem Assessment: The Bee Branch Watershed, where over 50% of Dubuque s

Public Information Meeting Wastewater Master Plan

Combined Sewer Overflow - Long Term Control Plan Update

ELIMINATE STORM WATER FROM ENTERING SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS

MONTHLY PROJECT REPORTS. Mill Creek Watershed

PA experienced major storms that resulted in over $1 billion dollars worth of damages since Since 1954 more than $16 billion in damages

Integrated. SUSTAINABLE Watershed Management MANUAL

SEWER OVERFLOW RESPONSE PLAN. Revised May 25, (Prior March 2012) (Prior Dec. 1999) Final

Using WinSLAMM v10 to Predict Stormwater Pollutant Loads and Evaluate LID Management Approaches Overview

LEHIGH COUNTY REGIONAL SEWER SYSTEM

Reducing Overflows using a Baffling Solution. OWEA AWWA 2014 Technical Conference & Expo August 28, 2014 Columbus, Ohio

Transcription:

PHASE 1 OF THE CONSENT DECREE/ WET WEATHER IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS THROUGH 2017 MSD is delivering Phase 1 is under the original cost estimate Improving Trends in Water Quality MSDGC has completed 72 of the required 100 milestones defined in Attachment 1A of the Final WWIP. MSDGC has constructed 102 of the 114 defined projects listed in Attachment 1B of the Final WWIP which are being completed under 133 separate construction contracts; of which 107 have finished construction. Revised Original Lower Mill Creek Partial Remedy (LMCPR) As of December 31, 2016 the LMCPR Program total cost was estimated to be $233.1 million in 2006$. The LMCPR including the Lick Run Watershed solution for CSO 5 was approved with broad community support and will result in $170 million less cost than the original deep tunnel solution. INVESTMENTS LEADING TO THESE ACCOMPLISHMENTS SINCE 2004 Eliminated Point Source Discharges Home sewage systems = 920 benefitted properties SSOs = 43 SSOs eliminated &/or controlled SSO 700 = 82% reduction in number of overflow events/year and 85% reduction in average E-coli density CSOs = 146 CSOs eliminated, monitoring 201 locations, reduction at least 1 BG overflows/year WWTPs = 8 treatment plants eliminated Pump Stations = 22 pump stations eliminated & 18 stations upgraded WWTP bypasses = 67 WWIP improvement projects at 7 WWTPs to address both dry & wet weather conditions In total 158 SSOs and 69 PSOs that have been eliminated over the past several decades Off-Loaded Stormwater from System RTCs = 5 facilities constructed to store flow 3.5 miles new storm sewers 72 miles of sewers lined & 5,000 manholes rehabilitated to reduce I/I Proposed regulations for developers 42 million gallons stormwater runoff capture 106,000 square feet biofiltration 164,000 square feet green roofs 344,000 square feet pervious pavement Protected Public Health WIB = 1 st program of its kind in the country 4,000 properties cleaned and/or protected from sewer back-ups 49 miles of sewers replaced to eliminate overflows & surcharging 18 miles of new sewers constructed 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Sewer Backup Program 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Cleanups Properties Protected Calls 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 -

WWIP Milestones Phase 1 to be completed by December 2018 Through March 31, 2017 MSDGC has completed 73 of the required 100 milestone as defined in Attachment 1A of the Final WWIP. MSDGC has constructed 102 of the 114 defined projects listed in Attachment 1B of the Final WWIP which are being completed under 133 separate construction contracts; of which 108 have finished construction. Of the remaining 25 Phase 1 WWIP construction contracts, nine are under construction, two are in bidding, and 14 are in design.

Phase 1 WWIP Program Costs. The projects listed in Attachment 1B of the Final WWIP Plan are trending at $1.05 billion in 2006 dollars as compared to the $1.14 billion estimated cost of the Phase 1 Program denoted in Attachment 1B of the Final WWIP. MSDGC has been able to deliver the Phase 1 Program within the initial program estimated cost. Values of individual projects have increased and/or decreased, but the overall program remains on budget.

Phase 1 Asset Management Program Costs. A total of 379 Asset Management projects (including allowance projects) were advanced or are forecasted to be completed prior to December 31, 2018 as part of the Total Phase 1 Capital Program. The total cost of these projects was approximately $680 million (2006$). Projects were constructed to improve WWTP, pump station, sewer, and watershed management assets. A total of 57 of the Asset Management projects were associated with $204 million (2006$) in allowances.

Sewer Back-Up Program (SBU). MSDGC has spent approximately $66.7 million on its WIB/SBU Program from its inception in 2004. Approximately: 4,000 properties have been cleaned and/or protected from sewer backups 49 miles of sewers have been replaced to eliminate overflows and surcharging 18 miles of new sewers have been constructed 825 properties have been protected with devices.

Green Infrastructure MSDGC continues to implement solutions to keep rain water runoff out of the sewer system. These solutions commonly referred to as green infrastructure can range from rain gardens and pervious pavement to bioswales, stormwater detention basins, stream restoration, and bioengineered streams. Accomplishments include: 42+ MG stormwater runoff captured 106,000 square feet biofiltration constructed 164,000 square feet green roofs 4,039 seedlings and container trees planted.

Smarter Sewers. MSDGC s smarter sewer system will use the existing sewer system more efficiently and cost effectively using technology and wet weather SCADA system. For example, when it rains in one part of Cincinnati, the interceptor sewers in that location may be full, but other areas where it hasn t rained may have available capacity. This approach allows MSDGC to store flows inside large interceptor sewers, storage tanks, and high-rate treatment facilities in different parts of the system using sensors to measure flow levels and gates and valves to direct the flows. The entire system is controlled by a SCADA computer system. This helps keep sewage in the pipes and out of our creeks.

Hydraulic Modeling. Based on detailed industry expert reviews, MSDGC has been maintaining a high standard of care since the system-wide model was developed in 2003 to support the LTCP and WWIP development. The model has been updated regularly and continues to improve with each updated version. MSDGC leads the industry for model development, improvements and enhancements as demonstrated by the size of the model, peer reviewed published papers on the model, and the use of cutting edge technology such as Geographical Information System (GIS) data, model status report cards, and model calibration and validation dashboards.

Improved Water Quality. The investments made during the early years of the Consent Decree (2006-2010) were demonstrated to have made a positive impact on the environment. 30% of Mill Creek is attaining water quality standards for aquatic life; Ohio River bacteria levels have improved from 30% compliance during the recreation season in 1990s to 75% in 2010 The Ohio River is safe for recreation 90% of the time during dry weather and is showing significant improvement during rain events; nine sites along the Mill Creek are in attainment for biological water quality standards (none in 1992); sixteen native species have migrated from the Ohio River to the Mill Creek There is an increased quality of fish and macro-invertebrate assemblages along the lower six miles of the Mill Creek.

Sewer Overflows Reduced by approximately: 43 SSOs have been eliminated or controlled 22 Pump Station Overflows (PSO) eliminated 51 active SSOs and 22 active PSOs remain 18 pump stations have been upgraded 146 CSOs have been eliminated from MSDGC s system with 201 remaining. Overflows from SSO 700 (the District s largest SSO) have been reduced from 47 activations during a Typical Year to approximately 8 per year. Additionally, SSO 700 has demonstrated 85% reduction in average E. coli density.

LESSONS LEARNED FROM PHASE 1 One of the drivers for evaluating the feasibility of implementing discrete WWIP projects during the Phase 2A Program was to apply the lessons learned during the Phase 1 Program: 10 year program duration is appropriate. Parametric estimates for large scale projects did not fully consider local conditions. Asset Management needs cannot indefinitely be deferred. Innovation requires time to demonstrate performance. Integrated planning opportunities can offload flow from combined sewer system. Several projects provide both an asset management and wet weather benefit. Flexibility provided by the allowances is critical to addressing immediate asset management needs as they arise. There is less overflow than initially predicted in the original system model. The Regulators clarified their expectations regarding program and project changes during the Phase 1 Adaptive Management sessions. Local affordability trends have declined since the Final WWIP was approved. Effective program implementation requires clarity of governance structure roles.