Welcome. RETScreen s Clean Energy Policy Toolkit. Clean Energy Solutions Center Webinar 26 April 2013

Similar documents
Welcome / Bienvenue. RETScreen Training Institute RETScreen 101 Introduction to Clean Energy Project Analysis

PDF s of the RETScreen data sheets are attached, as are the photos used in the analysis.

MONOAGENT HEATING SYSTEM FOR SOLITARY CONSUMERS, USING HEAT FROM BIOMASS BURNING

Retscreen method used to estimate overall heating needs and costs.

Loyola University Residence Hall Solar Thermal Feasibility Study

SOLAR THERMAL IT S HOT AGAIN! Solar Water Heating and Solar Thermal Energy Solutions

Retscreen method used to quantify current shading estimates.

Putting Emission reductions into a perspective: RETScreen: Project Evaluation Tool (Introduction) UNFCCC Secretariat Janak Shrestha, SDM programme

Report Solar Site Visit

Renewable Energy Financial Support in Canada. M. Stumborg, AAFC SPARC Swift Current, Saskatchewan Canada

RETScreen ICE AND CURLING RINKS Model

Lecture 4 Economics and Costs

The CSI Site. Research Studies. Value? Depends on who you are: How to Determine the Value of a Solar Investment

Feasibility of Wind Turbine Systems in Highway Maintenance Facilities

Value? Depends on who you are: The CSI Site

Compendium of Regulations & Tariff Orders Issued by Regulatory Commissions for Renewable Energy Sources in India

Lecture 4 Economics and Costs

How to deliver a renewable energy project. Jemma Benson CO2Sense

Economics of Distributed Resources

Demystifying Rooftop Solar

Business Programs: Commercial and Industrial Renewable Energy Loan Program. Technical Application and Instructions

TRUST EPC South benchmarking and assessment tools for energy efficiency investments

Solar Retrofit Sydney, Australia PV grid connected system

COGEN 3 Technical Financial Analysis Model

AC : SIMULATION TOOLS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS

Policy Instruments for Renewable Energy: An Introduction

An End User Perspective on the Cost of Solar Photovoltaic Energy Systems Installed by Commercial Organizations. Kenton D. Swift May 14, 2012

Energy Proofing Irelands Poultry Sector Hillgrove Hotel Monaghan 6/11/

Outline. Introduction to Wisconsin. Barriers to Generating Electricity from. Incentives and Regulations Intended to

Grid-Connected Renewable Energy

RETScreen Tutorial Renewables in Remote Microgrids Conference. Naveen Goswamy September 18, 2015

Saving and Generating Energy Dollars

Viable Renewable Energy Projects. Renewable Energy

A TOOL TO MARKET CUSTOMER-SITED SMALL WIND SYSTEMS

Renewable Energy Update. Sustainability/Energy Committee April 22, 2014

Credit line to support energy efficiency in Slovak municipalities

Renewable Energy Feasibility Study for Ione Band of Miwok Indians

AEP Ohio. Combined Heat and Power (CHP) May 24 th, 2017 Steve Giles Vice President Alternative Energy Hull & Associates, Inc.

Energy Savings by Retrofitting Multi-Unit Residential Buildings: Case Studies

Green Economy Incentives: CHINA

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION

A Regional NAMA Framework for Solar PV in the Caribbean Pablo Benitez, PhD World Bank

Energy Audits: Lessons Learned Over 30 Million Square Feet

Renewable Energy Overview. CleanMed 2012 Jeff Rich, Executive Director GL Envision, LLC 1

Renewable Energy Act of 2008

Wind Energy. Evaluating the International Renewable Energy Market for the Creation of a Longstanding and Secure Energy Policy 12/29/10

Incentives to Increase Renewable Energy. Linda M. Wagner Senior Legal and Policy Advisor Illinois Commerce Commission

Bundled Energy Solutions to Lower Operating Costs and Maximize ROI. Harvey Katzen Director of Bundled Energy Services ABM Building and Energy

Combined Heat and Power (CHP): Applications of Distributed Power

Energy Policy 2015 Annual Update

Electric Power Generation Using Waste Gas

Renewable & Alternative Energy Resources: What s the difference? 2

Compendium of Regulations & Tariff Orders Issued by Regulatory Commissions for Renewable Energy Sources in India

Department of Legislative Services

RATE 665 RENEWABLE FEED-IN TARIFF

The Economics of Wind Energy. Charles Vaughan Regional Director, Eastern United States Clipper Windpower, Inc.

EXAMPLE TARIFF MID-SIZE COMMERCIAL

COMMERCIAL PROSUMERS DEVELOPMENTS AND POLICY OPTIONS (RE-COM-PROSUMERS)

ECE 333 GREEN ELECTRIC ENERGY 15. PV ECONOMICS

Sustainable Development Guidance

Office of Energy Initiatives

CO 2 Capture and Storage Economics and Technology

EXAMPLE TARIFF DOMESTIC

Table 1: Financial Analysis for without and with storage scenarios

The German solar rooftop experience Applicability in the Indian context. Indo-German Development Cooperation June 7 th, 2016

Alternative Energy Concept Plan San Bernardino Community College District

Microgrids: Project Economics & Financing Strategies NESEA Building Energy 2014 March 6-8, 2014

CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project Draft License Application Exhibit D Project Costs and Financing

April, 10 th, Naples, Italy

Feed-in Tariff Structure Development for the Kingdom of Bahrain for PV Electricity

Costs and Benefits of Combined Heat and Power

Automatic Meter Reading

Derisking Renewable Energy Investment ( NAMA Finance Case Study Guidance Note

DC Surface (non-submersible) pumps are most economical. Reduce pumping energy by half

Case Studies and Approach

Wind Power Update. Larry Flowers NREL. January 15, 2002

OSU Cascades Net Zero Campus. Recommendations

Capacity Building Workshop on Small Hydro Power Project Development

Powergen International 2003 IMTE AG

ESCO EXPERIENCE IN JAMAICA

Geothermal Heat Pump Technology. What s new in the business of capturing the. Energy We Already OWN

GlenWyvis renewable heat assessment. 27 th September 2015

Renewable Portfolio Standards

WIND POWER TARIFF POLICY INDIAN SCENARIO

Subtask 1: Economic of PV System Performance and Reliability

Client Name/Presentation Title

Metrus Paying the Way for Energy Efficiency

Net Project Value Assessment of Korean Offshore Floating Wind Farm using Y-Wind Semi Platform

PACIFICORP: PRIVATE GENERATION RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FOR LONG TERM PLANNING

Strategies for measuring and reducing your carbon footprint

Alberta s Contribution. Alberta Party Caucus Climate Change Plan

An Introduction to the Renewable Heat Incentive

An Institutional Analysis Of the Transition to Renewable Energy

Economic Models for Environmental Sustainability Anaerobic Digesters and a Complimentary Energy Decision Support Tool.

ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN STUDY

Financing in the context of carbon markets, carbon finance, and flexible mechanisms

ENERGY AUDIT REPORTS SUMMARY

POLICIES for the PROMOTION of NEW and RENEWABLE ENERGIES INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOENERGY UTILIZATIO AND ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY

Brent Gloy, April

Transcription:

Welcome RETScreen s Clean Energy Policy Toolkit Clean Energy Solutions Center Webinar 26 April 2013

RETScreen s Mission: Empower Cleaner Energy Decisions Worldwide

What is RETScreen? World s leading clean energy decision-making software Energy efficiency; heating & cooling; power generation; and cogeneration Fossil fuels Renewable energy 36 languages covering 2/3rds Earth s population 372,000+ users in 222 countries & territories 40,000+ new users each year 500+ universities & colleges use for training & research Over $8 billion in direct user savings since 1998

Example of Project Facilitated by RETScreen

Example of Project Facilitated by RETScreen

Overview of RETScreen Suite Software RETScreen Training Institute

RETScreen Software Suite Downloading and running RETScreen Software Suite will install two separate programs: RETScreen 4 is an Excel-based clean energy project analysis software tool that helps decision makers quickly and inexpensively determine the technical and financial viability of potential renewable energy, energy efficiency and cogeneration projects. RETScreen Plus is a Windows-based energy management software tool that allows project owners to easily verify the ongoing energy performance of their facilities. Also available on RETScreen website: REFRIG3 is an Excel-based RETScreen Energy Efficient Arena & Supermarket Project Model (Version 3 format)

Cumulative cash flows ($) Cumulative cash flows ($) Analysis Type (Start Sheet) Method 1 Method 2 RETScreen Energy Model - User-defined User-defined User-defined Energy Green power Other Base case Proposed case Technology Grid electricity Wind turbine Power capacity kw 2,000 Capacity factor % 30% Electricity exported to grid MWh 5,256 Incremental initial costs $/kw 2,000 O&M (savings) costs $/kwh 0.010 Electricity export rate $/kwh 0.150 Emission Analysis GHG emission factor T&D GHG emission Base case electricity system (Baseline) (excl. T&D) losses factor Country - region Fuel type tco2/mwh % tco2/mwh Canada All types 0.211 5.0% 0.222 Electricity exported to grid MWh 5,256 T&D losses 8.0% GHG emission Base case tco2 1,167 Proposed case tco2 93 Gross annual GHG emission reduction tco2 1,074 GHG credits transaction fee % 0.0% Net annual GHG emission reduction tco2 1,074 is equivalent to 218 GHG reduction income GHG reduction credit rate $/tco2 0.00 Financial Analysis Financial parameters Inflation rate % 2.0% Project life yr 20 Debt ratio % 70% Debt interest rate % 7.00% Debt term yr 10 Initial costs Incremental initial costs $ 4,000,000 100.0% Other $ 0.0% Total initial costs $ 4,000,000 100.0% Incentives and grants $ 0.0% Annual costs and debt payments O&M (savings) costs $ Fuel cost - proposed case $ 0 Debt payments - 10 yrs $ 398,657 Other $ Total annual costs $ 451,217 Annual savings and income Fuel cost - base case $ 0 Electricity export income $ 788,400 Other $ Total annual savings and income $ 788,400 Financial viability Pre-tax IRR - equity % 34.6% Pre-tax IRR - assets % 12.3% Simple payback yr 5.4 Equity payback yr 3.2 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 0-2,000,000 Cars & light trucks not used Cumulative cash flows graph 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Year RETScreen Energy Model - Energy efficiency measures project Fuels & schedules Show data Fuel Fuel type 1 Fuel type 2 Fuel type 3 Fuel type 4 Fuel type 5 Fuel type 6 Fuel type Electricity Natural gas - m³ Fuel consumption - unit MWh m³ #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A Fuel rate - unit $/kwh $/m³ #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A Fuel rate 0.100 0.400 RETScreen Cost Analysis - Energy efficiency measures project Schedule Unit Settings Schedule 1 Schedule 2 Schedule 3 Schedule 4 Schedule 5 Schedule 6 Description Method 1 24/7 Notes/Range Second currency Method 2 Occupied OccupiedSecond currency Occupied Occupied Notes/Range Occupied None Temperature - space heating C 23.0 21.0 Cost allocation Temperature - space cooling C 23.0 24.0 Initial costs (credits) Unoccupied UnoccupiedUnit Unoccupied Quantity Unoccupied Unit cost UnoccupiedAmount Relative costs Temperature - unoccupied +/- C Feasibility study 3.0 Feasibility study Occupied Occupied cost Occupied Occupied Occupied $ - Occupancy rate - daily h/d h/d RETScreen h/d Emission h/d Reduction h/d Analysis - Energy h/d efficiency measures project Sub-total: $ - 0.0% Monday 24 18.0 Development Tuesday 24 18.0 Emission Analysis Development cost $ - Wednesday 24 18.0 Thursday Sub-total: 24 18.0 $ - 0.0% Method 1 Global warming potential of GHG Friday Engineering 24 18.0 Saturday Engineering 24 18.0 Method cost 2 $ - 21 tonnes CO2 = 1 tonne CH4 (IPCC 1996) Sunday Sub-total: 24 18.0 Method 3 $ - 0.0% 310 tonnes CO2 = 1 tonne N2O (IPCC 1996) Occupancy rate - annual h/yr Energy efficiency 8,760 measures 6,570 0 0 0 0 RETScreen Financial Analysis - Energy efficiency measures project % Incremental initial 100% costs 75% 0% 0% 0% 0% $ 60,000 100.0% Balance of system & miscellaneous Financial parameters Project costs and savings/income summary Yearly cash flows Base case system GHG summary (Baseline) Heating/cooling changeover temperature C 16.0Spare parts % General $ - Initial costs Year Pre-tax After-tax Cumulative Length of heating season d 242Transportation project Fuel cost escalation $ rate - % 2.0% Feasibility study 0.0% $ 0 # $ $ $ Length of cooling season d 123Training & commissioning p-d Inflation rate CO2 emission CH4 emission $ - % N2O 2.0% emission Development Fuel 0.0% $ GHG emission 0 0-60,000-60,000-60,000 User-defined cost Fuel Discount mix rate $ factor - factor % 12.0% factor Engineering consumption 0.0% $ factor 0GHG 1emission 29,232 29,232-30,768 Contingencies Fuel type Project % $ % life 60,000 $ kg/gj - kg/gj yr kg/gj 40 Power system MWh 0.0% $ tco2/mwh 0 2tCO2 29,817 29,817-951 Facility characteristics Show data Interest during construction Natural gas $ 100.0% Heating system 60,000 $ - 1,668 0.0% $ 0.179 0 3 299 30,413 30,413 29,463 Sub-total: Total Finance Enter number of months 100.0% Cooling system $ - 0.0% 1,668 0.0% $ 0.179 0 4 299 31,022 31,022 60,484 Incremental Fuel cost Incremental Incentives and Include grants $ User-defined 0.0% $ 0 5 31,642 31,642 92,126 Total initial costs $ 60,000 100.0% Show: Heating Cooling Electricity initial costs savings O&M savings Simple payback Debt ratio measure? % Energy efficiency measures 100.0% $ 60,000 6 32,275 32,275 124,401 Fuel saved GJ GJ GJ $ $ $ yr Debt $ 0 Balance of system & misc. 0.0% $ 0 7 32,920 32,920 157,321 Annual costs (credits) Proposed case Unit system GHG Quantity summary (Energy Unit cost Amount Heating system Equity efficiency measures project) $ 60,000 Total initial costs 100.0% $ 60,000 8 33,579 33,579 190,900 O&M Boiler 0 - - 0 0 0 - Debt interest rate % 9 34,250 34,250 225,150 O&M (savings) costs project $ - Cooling system Debt term CO2 emission CH4 emission yr N2O emission Incentives and grants Fuel $ GHG emission 0 10 34,935 34,935 260,086 Parts & labour project Fuel Debt mix payments $ factor - factor $/yr factor 0 consumption factor GHG 11emission 35,634 35,634 295,720 Air-conditioning - 0-0 0 0 - User-defined cost $ - Building envelope Fuel type % kg/gj kg/gj kg/gj Annual costs and debt paymentsmwh tco2/mwh 12 tco2 36,347 36,347 332,066 Contingencies % $ - $ - O&M $ 0 13 37,074 37,074 369,140 Appartment building 2,686 0-60,000 28,659 Natural gas 0 2.1 100.0% 922 0.179 165 Sub-total: Income tax analysis $ - Fuel cost - proposed case $ 35,419 14 37,815 37,815 406,955 Ventilation Total 100.0% 922 0.179 165 Effective income tax rate % Debt payments - 0 yrs $ 0 15 38,571 38,571 445,527 Fuel cost - proposed case Lights Loss carryforward? T&D losses No Total annual costs $ Total 35,419 16 165 39,343 39,343 484,869 Natural gas m³ 88,546 $ 0.400 $ 35,419 Electrical equipment Depreciation method Declining balance 17 40,130 40,130 524,999 Sub-total: $ 35,419 Hot water GHG emission reduction summary Half-year rule - year 1 yes/no Yes Periodic costs (credits) 18 40,932 40,932 565,931 Depreciation tax basis % $ 0 19 41,751 41,751 607,682 Other Annual savings Unit Quantity Unit Depreciation cost rate Amount % Total 2,686 Fuel 0 cost - base case 0 60,000 28,659 0 2.09 Gross annual $ 0 Net 20annual 42,586 42,586 650,268 Depreciation period yr 15 End of project life - cost $ 0 21 43,438 43,438 693,706 Years of Base case Proposed case GHG emission GHG credits GHG emission Natural gas m³ 160,194 $ Tax holiday 0.400 available? $ 64,078 yes/no No 22 44,306 44,306 738,012 occurrence GHG emission GHG emission reduction transaction fee reduction Sub-total: Tax holiday duration $ 64,078 yr Annual savings and income 23 45,193 45,193 783,205 Summary Show data Energy efficiency measures yr tco2 tco2 Fuel cost - base case tco2 $ % 64,078 24 tco2 46,096 46,096 829,301 project Annual 1 to -1income 299 165 Electricity export income 134 $ 0 25134 47,018 47,018 876,320 Fuel Periodic costs (credits) Base case Proposed Unit case Year Fuel Unit cost cost savings Amount Electricity export income GHG reduction income - 0 yrs $ 0 26 47,959 47,959 924,279 Fuel User-defined cost $ - Electricity exported to grid MWh 0 Customer premium income (rebate) $ 0 27 48,918 48,918 973,196 consumption - Fuel Fuel Fuel cost $ - Fuel type unit Fuel rate End of project consumption life Net annual Fuel cost consumptioncost GHG emission reduction Electricity export rate Fuel cost Fuel saved savings $ 134 - tco2 $/MWh is equivalent 0.00 Other to income 27.2 (cost) - yrs Cars & light trucks not $ used 0 28 49,896 49,896 1,023,093 Electricity export income $ 0 CE production income - yrs $ 0 29 50,894 50,894 1,073,987 Natural gas m³ $ 0.400 160,194.2 $ 64,078 88,546.3 $ 35,419 71,647.8 Electricity $ export escalation 28,659 rate % Total annual savings and income $ 64,078 30 51,912 51,912 1,125,899 Total $ 64,078 $ 35,419 $ 28,659 31 52,950 52,950 1,178,849 GHG reduction income 32 54,009 54,009 1,232,858 Fuel Fuel Fuel Fuel tco2/yr 0 33 55,089 55,089 1,287,948 Project verification consumption - consumption - consumption consumption - Net GHG reduction tco2/yr 134 Financial viability 34 56,191 56,191 1,344,139 Fuel type unit historical Base case variance Net GHG reduction - 40 yrs tco2 5,342 Pre-tax IRR - equity % 50.7% 35 57,315 57,315 1,401,454 Natural gas m³ 160,194.2 GHG reduction credit rate $/tco2 Pre-tax IRR - assets % 50.7% 36 58,461 58,461 1,459,916 GHG reduction income $ 0 37 59,631 59,631 1,519,546 Heating Cooling Electricity Total GHG reduction credit duration yr After-tax IRR - equity % 50.7% 38 60,823 60,823 1,580,370 Energy GJ GJ GJ GJ Net GHG reduction - 0 yrs tco2 0 After-tax IRR - assets % 50.7% 39 62,040 62,040 1,642,409 Energy - base case 4,204 0 0 4,204 GHG reduction credit escalation rate % 40 63,281 63,281 1,705,690 Energy - proposed case 2,324 0 0 2,324 Simple payback yr 2.1 41 0 0 1,705,690 Energy saved 1,880 0 0 1,880 Customer premium income (rebate) Equity payback yr 2.0 42 0 0 1,705,690 Energy saved - % 44.7% 44.7% Electricity premium (rebate) % 43 0 0 1,705,690 Electricity premium income (rebate) $ 0 Net Present Value (NPV) $ 225,387 44 0 0 1,705,690 Benchmark Heating premium (rebate) % Annual life cycle savings $/yr 27,340 45 0 0 1,705,690 Energy unit kwh Heating premium income (rebate) $ 0 46 0 0 1,705,690 Reference unit m² 7,500 Cooling premium (rebate) % Benefit-Cost (B-C) ratio 4.76 47 0 0 1,705,690 User-defined m² 2,000 Cooling premium income (rebate) $ 0 Debt service coverage No debt 48 0 0 1,705,690 Customer premium income (rebate) $ 0 Energy production cost $/MWh -791.21 49 0 0 1,705,690 Benchmark Heating Cooling Electricity Total GHG reduction cost $/tco2 (205) 50 0 0 1,705,690 Energy kwh/m² kwh/m² kwh/m² kwh/m² Other income (cost) Energy MWh Cumulative cash flows graph Energy - base case 155.7 0.0 0.0 155.7 Rate $/MWh Energy - proposed case 86.1 0.0 0.0 86.1 1,800,000 Other income (cost) $ 0 Energy saved 69.6 0.0 0.0 69.6 Duration yr Escalation rate % 1,600,000 Clean Energy (CE) production income CE production MWh 922 CE production credit rate $/kwh 1,400,000 CE production income $ 0 CE production credit duration yr 1,200,000 CE production credit escalation rate % Energy delivered 1,000,000 Fuel type (MWh) Clean energy 1 Natural gas 922 Yes 800,000 2 No 3 No 4 No 600,000 5 No 6 No 7 No 400,000 8 No 9 No 200,000 # No # No # No 0 # No 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 # No -200,000 # No # No # No # No Year

RETScreen Training Institute RETScreen 101 - Introduction to Clean Energy Project Analysis (just completed) RETScreen 201 - Energy Efficiency Project Analysis RETScreen 202 - Heating & Cooling Project Analysis RETScreen 203 - Power Project Analysis RETScreen 301 - Cogeneration Project Analysis RETScreen 302 - Energy Performance Analysis We do customized training!

Clean Energy Policy Analysis With RETScreen Photo Credit: Strong, Steven DOE/NREL

Clean Energy Policies - Incentives Direct Cash Payments Grants and Rebates Performance-Based Payments Tax Incentives Tax Credits Tax Exemptions Accelerated Depreciation Loan Programs

Clean Energy Policies - Regulations Building Code Mandates Favourable Permitting Rules Interconnection Standards

Clean Energy Policies - Hybrids Feed-in Tariffs Utility Quota Obligations Net Metering Emissions & Environmental Attributes Trading

RETScreen for Projects and Policy RETScreen as a tool to demonstrate the viability of clean energy projects But also useful for planning, designing, implementing, and reviewing the viability of clean energy policies

The Policy Cycle Inform Design Implement Monitor Review

Examples of RETScreen Use for Policy International (UNFCCC) National (Canada) Sub-National (Texas) Municipal (Toronto) Utility (National Grid)

RETScreen Clean Energy Policy Toolkit Developed by RETScreen International Financially supported by a grant from the Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Partnership (REEEP) Includes Case Studies/Templates, e-textbook Chapter, Training Slides, and Sample Documents Available on the RETScreen Website and within the RETScreen User Manual

Case Studies & Templates Power Photovoltaic Feed-in Tariff Policy / Canada Power Wind GHG Reduction Income Policy / China Heating Solar Water Heater Capital Cost Incentive Policy / USA User-defined Tax and Finance Measures Policy / Canada + many more!

Presentation Slides & e-textbook Chapter See e-textbook Clean Energy Project Analysis: RETScreen Engineering and Cases Clean Energy Policy Analysis with RETScreen

Software Demo