Steve Patrinick Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Dallas, TX Tim Crobons Connetics Transportation Group, Lake Mary, FL Andrew Ittigson AECOM, Dallas, TX

Similar documents
Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA) to support development of the. Public Meetings. January 28, 29 and February 2, 2015

Labor - Management Partnerships: Collaboration for Quality of Service and Job Creation

Transit Effectiveness Project Policy Advisory Group February 1, 2006

Transit Investment Direction and Plan Introduction. Transportation Advisory Board October 18, 2017

Travel Demand Forecasting User Guide

Transit Planning Game

Service Development. Committee of the Whole April 3, 2019 Adam Harrington, Director of Service Development 1

Transit Investment Direction and Plan Introduction. Transportation Advisory Board TPP Workshop August 16, 2017

TRANSIT SERVICE GUIDELINES

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis. Transit Talk: ULI Executive Round Table Discussion. Thursday, April 30, :30 AM 1:00 PM

RouteAhead Update: Progress Toward Service Goals

Bus Rapid Transit Network Marketing Strategy

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA)

Coordinating Committee. November 18, 2014

Fairfax County Countywide Transit Network Study

Locally Preferred Alternative. Work In Progress; Subject To Change Without Notice 1

Mankato Transit Development Plan Executive Summary Report. June 2018

Regional Transit System Plan

10. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT, LEADERSHIP, AND OVERSIGHT GUIDELINES

BACKGROUND. The FasTracks Plan includes three core goals:

Chapter 3 Stakeholder Interviews and Summary of Needs

Adoption of New DART Service Standards

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting November 15, 2012

Moving the first state forward! Delaware s Statewide Long- Range Transportation Plan November 17, 2010 WILMAPCO Our Town

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Memphis MPO March 30, 2015

Transportation Report to SPC on Transportation and Transit 2017 March 15. ISC: UNRESTRICTED TT Page 1 of 7 ROUTEAHEAD UPDATE

Asheville, North Carolina s Sustainable Operations Plan Going Green in the Blue Ridge Mountains

2040 MTP Information Session Transportation Alternatives Analysis

in the Fraser Valley Foundation Paper #4

Regional Transit Framework Study

Transit Market and Travel Demand Regional Service Councils June 2018

Transit Market and Travel Demand Citizens Advisory Council

Guiding Principles of the Plan:

The Economic and Societal Impact of Hampton Roads Transit: Investment Scenarios

SAN LUIS OBISPO REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY STRATEGIC BUSINESS PLAN Adopted July 9, 2014

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

FOCUS40 MassDOT Board Presentation March 13, 2017

Champion Report. REPORTING PERIOD: April 15, 2014 through July 15, Theme Area: Transportation Jarrett Leas, Tim Houle, Tad Erickson

Service Investment Opportunities

Creating a Transit Supply Index. Andrew Keller Regional Transportation Authority and University of Illinois at Chicago

SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION)

FUTURE BUS RAPID TRANSIT PLANS

US 75 Integrated Corridor Management

Title VI Required Service Standards, Policies and Definitions

Table of Contents. YRT/Viva at a Glance 17 Our Commitment 18

Transit System Survey

Alternatives Analysis, New Starts

Transit Service Guidelines

COMPREHENSIVE SERVICE AND MARKETING STUDY

12 Evaluation of Alternatives

Presentation to Engineers Ireland

IMPERIAL VALLEY COLLEGE/SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY TRANSIT STUDY DRAFT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM: Implementation of Recommended Plan

PRTC Strategic Plan Recommendations

BUS RAPID TRANSIT CORRIDOR

EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES CARRIED FORWARD

DART s Role in Transit - Oriented Development. Jack Wierzenski,, Director Economic Development & Planning Dallas Area Rapid Transit

Riverview Corridor Pre-Project Development Study

2. Goals and Objectives

Executive Summary and Staff Recommendation

Overview of Draft Metro Strategic Plan April 12, 2018

Metrorail and Metrobus Fare Structure Model

Draft SFMTA Strategic Plan

Transit Future Plan. TRANSIT future. VICTORIA REGION May 2011 Executive Summary. Linking Communities, Businesses & Lifestyles

WANT A BETTER BUS SYSTEM? SO DOES MTA.

APPENDIX N East King County Subarea High Capacity Transit (HCT) Analysis: Approach to Assessing System-Level Alternatives

SERVICE IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES AND SCENARIOS

Moving Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Bicycle Mobility Master Plan Transit Master Plan

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2050

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Service in Downtown Los Angeles

Unified Corridor Investment Study Performance Dashboard

APPENDIX A - PLANS AND POLICY REVIEW FEBRUARY 2017

Tacoma Link Stakeholder Group

2035 LRTP Transportation Options Introduction

Los Angeles County Congestion Reduction Demonstration Project

ARLINGTON COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Cotton Belt Corridor. Area Focus Group (AFG) North Dallas May 9, John Hoppie, Capital Planning

DART Briefing D2, Streetcar, Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA) and Cotton Belt

3. STATION SPACING AND SITING GUIDELINES

FCEDA MarComm Session SWOT Workshop. September 18, 2012

The Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Public Meetings February 2016

2010 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan. Minnesota Department of Transportation

El Camino Real BRT Phasing Plan Initial Service Concept Development and Screening

The Development of a Master Plan for Public Transport: The Riyadh Example

Strategic Plan. SFMTA Board of Directors Workshop

2018 Comprehensive Guide Plan Steering Committee. Wednesday, October 11, Minnehaha Room, Minnetonka City Hall. 6:00 8:00 p.m.

TSM/TDM (Transit and Roadway Efficiency) Concept - Analysis and Results

Appendix B. Technical Memoranda and Reports

Conceptual Development Schedule for Business Plan FY2020 FY2024 & Budget FY2020

Christof Spieler. Kurt Luhrsen. Jim Archer

Executive Summary. Reimagining a Legacy Transit System: Lessons from Wilmington, Delaware

MEMPHIS AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN

Southwest Corridor Plan Project Update. June 11, 2013

Transit Feasibility Study

Red Line/HealthLine Extension Major Transportation Improvement Analysis

Transit Future Plan. REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NANAIMO February 2014 Executive Summary. TRANSIT future

The New SFMTA Strategic Plan

West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions. Stakeholder Advisory Group March 14, 2018

ITEM I I 1. Project. System. Prepared. for: by: Prepared. Review Copy. Date. Initials RK. Originated. Checker. Verified by

Route 1 Regional Growth Strategy Vision for a Prosperous and Sustainable Future

Transcription:

DART Comprehensive Operations Analysis Steve Patrinick Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Dallas, TX Tim Crobons Connetics Transportation Group, Lake Mary, FL Andrew Ittigson AECOM, Dallas, TX

DART COA Today s Presentation A Consultant can be.. DART System Today COA Goals Why Now? Scope Approach & Study Results Why did it work? Key Take-Aways 2

DART COA A consultant can be... A. Somebody who asks for your ideas and then sells them back to you in a pretty package B. Somebody who starts with a report that was written for another agency and changes the names and places to match your service area 3

DART COA A consultant can be... C. A partner in research who extends your agency s expertise, knowledge, and resources beyond the capability of your staff, while both teaching and learning from those with the best knowledge of your system 4

Consultant Requirements Agency service planning and scheduling experience! Service Plan Development through Implementation Experience Interdepartmental relationships Flow & Agreement Flexible and Imaginative offer alternative solutions Responsive! 5

The COA Team Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) AECOM Lead consultant contracting with DART for general consulting services Connetics (CTG) Lead Consultant for COA - expertise in analyzing transit systems 6

Overview of DART System Formed in 1983 13 member cities (2 others contract for service) 2.3 million population in service area (6.6 million in region) Longest light rail network in North America (90 miles) 140+ bus routes 654 buses / 163 light rail vehicles 7

Why Now at DART? Current rail build-out is nearly complete Bus routes have been reorganized around phased rail openings At the same time, levels of bus service have been reduced significantly Current emphasis is on coverage throughout the Service Area Can leverage recent data collection to better understand travel and ridership patterns 8

DART COA Goals Evaluate system comprehensively Reallocate resources to improve efficiency, effectiveness, ridership, productivity Ensure services are equitable Develop support through public and stakeholder input Improve understanding of existing and emerging markets Implementation periods short and long term plans Comprehensive Operations Analysis Detailed System Review Advisory Committee Customer Outreach Service Change Options 9

What did DART get? A better understanding of our customer and market needs A 10-Year Service Plan that phases service changes to respond to identified needs and build ridership Alternative Financial Scenarios Solid foundation build on through year 2040 Integrate recommendations into 2040 Transit System Plan 10

Service Plan Development Range of Strategies / Philosophy Radical Clean Slate Complete Restructuring of Transit Network (except rail) Potential change to all bus routes Significant Resource Re-allocation moves resources to areas of highest productivity Moderate Network Build-up Maintains the Most Effective Routes & Services Defines Core Network Builds Supporting Network around Core Network (incl. rail) Moderate Resource Reallocation assigns service levels based on demand and trip flows/volumes Minimal Tweaking Focused on changes / fixes to worst issues Focused on Small Incremental Changes over Longer Period of Time Minimal Resource Reallocation attempts to maintain existing resource distribution 11

Service Plan Priorities Serve new and emerging travel markets Serve Significant Travel Markets (currently unserved) Improve Network connectivity Increase travel speed (route structure and frequency) Maintain coverage / right-size service Address current on-time performance challenges 12

Service Plan Structures High Frequency Rapid Ride Network Regional / Airport Express Network Strengthened Regional / Crosstown Network Improved Uptown Service Consistent Service Headways (Bus- Rail) Direct Routing 13

The Honeymoon Period Data Collected, Analyzed & Understood Priorities and Goals Established 14

The Honeymoon is Over! Harsh Realities! Financial restrictions Political influences Jurisdictional needs Neighborhood concerns Service equity Keys to success: Find Common Ground Focus on Implementable Solutions Ensure Financial Feasibility Teamwork is essential 15

COA Service Plan Overview Data-Driven Development Approach 10-Year Vision, with Phased Implementation Bus Service Layers Ride Regional / Rapid Uptown / Regional Network Local / Airport Activity On-Call Downtown Routes Neighborhood Express Center Zones Express Routes Rapid Ride Network Regional / Airport Express Downtown / Uptown Express Regional Routes Local and Neighborhood Routes Activity Center Routes On-Call Zones (Demand Response service) 16 16

Rapid Ride Network Key Features: Regional Core Network Complements Rail Network Limited Access BRT-Lite Service Underlying all-day local service (match LRT frequencies, 15/20) Addresses regional cross-town travel movements Faster Travel Times Enhanced Passenger Amenities Serves Activity Centers / Major Employment Concentrations 17

Rapid Ride Network Benefits Population Accessibility to Premium Transit: Population Estimate Total Percent of Service Area Existing Rail 202,000 7.93% Rapid Ride Increase 352,600 13.84% Rail and Rapid Total 554,600 21.77% DART Service Area 2,548,000 Employment Accessibility to Premium Transit: Employment Estimate Total Percent of Service Area Existing Rail 472,000 21.23% Rapid Ride Increase 340,700 15.33% Rail and Rapid Total 812,700 36.56% DART Service Area 2,223,000 Catchment areas reflect ½ mile radius around station/stop 18

Design & Implementation Elements: Enhanced Station Amenities Capital Improvements and ITS Safety & Security Procedures Active Management Branding Rapid Ride Network Advertisement Attractive Service Levels 19

Regional / Airport Express Network Key Features: Regional Express to Airport Complements Rail Network Limited Access Express Service 7 day a week/20 hour a day service/ 60 minute service Addresses Airport employment & travel markets Faster Travel Times to Airport from areas not served by rail 20

Regional / Airport Express Network Travel Markets 5-mile Transit Catchments using Mobile Device Tracking Data All Purpose Trip Interactions with DFW Airport Route 290 (Red) = 27,635 Route 293 (Green) = 16,229 Route 292 (Orange) = 15,038 Route 291 (Blue) = 11,483 21

Proposed 10-Year Plan Network Additional Scenarios: Cost Neutral Existing and future running time adjustments Additional service productivity enhancements Moderate Growth Existing and future running time adjustments Scaled version on Full Service Plan 22

Why did it work? Everyone was willing to learn Consultants were willing to go out in the field, ride the system, and learn about how customers use the system DART staff were willing to put aside preconceived notions and keep an open mind to new approaches and unexpected findings The team made it interesting for one another 23

Why did it work? Solutions were not pre-determined We ve always done things this way was cast aside because DART conceded that new approaches would be needed to meet growing needs with available resources Staff and consultants did not twist the findings to fit their own pre-conceived notions 24

Presentation Take-Aways Define Goals & Objectives Early Service Related Staff - Critical Input! Seek Non-Traditional Data Sources Mobile Device Tracking Data Workshop Data Analysis Results Ensure everyone understands the results Tools everyone can use Team consensus on analysis Clearly Define Challenges! 25

Presentation Take-Aways Workshop Draft Service Plans with Agency Staff Find Common Ground Focus on Implementable Solutions Ensure Financial Feasibility Alternative Approaches Tie your plans together (near-term to long-range) Be Flexible! 26

Questions? Contact us Steve Patrinick, Manager of Service Planning, DART, (214) 749-2802, spatrinick@dart.org Tim Crobons, Connetics Transportation Group, (407) 302-5131, tcrobons@ctgconsult.com Andrew Ittigson, AECOM, (214) 672-2858, andrew.ittigson@aecom.com 27