Intermittent Stream Reclamation

Similar documents
DA Permit SAJ Attachment G - Compensatory Mitigation Plan Attachment A, Part 3 - Mitigation Categories

THE WATERSHED The watershed is an area of land that drains into a stream. This includes both the surface runoff and groundwater. Because a stream is m

SW-74 SERENOVA PRESERVE SITES 2, 3, 4, 8 MITIGATION PLAN

IMPROVING OUTCOMES FOR STREAM ALTERATION PROJECTS

MANAGEMENT OF WATERFRONT PROPERTIES FOR HOMEOWNERS

Appendix D: MULTI-AGENCY COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PLAN CHECKLIST 1

CITY OF NEW WESTMINSTER. Bylaw No. 7033, 2005 RIPARIAN AREAS PROTECTION BYLAW

Compensatory Mitigation Plan Requirements For Permittee Responsible Mitigation Projects St. Louis District, Corps of Engineers May 2010

SECTION 10: WETLANDS PROTECTION

An Analysis of IMC Estimated Reclamation Costs for the Proposed Ona Mine

Project Goals and Scoping

April 1999 Reclaimed Stream Study 1. Executive Summary

CHAPTER 1. Ecological Integrity

Appendix E : Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Areas

RIPARIAN AREAS REGULATION

Old Mill School Stream Restoration

Meacham Creek Restoration Project

Logan River at Rendezvous Park, Channel and Floodplain Restoration: Crack Willow (Salix fragilis) Issues and Management Strategies

4. Ponds and infiltration BMPs can achieve 60 to 100% removal efficiencies for sediment.

PROSPECTUS. Proposed Beech River Canal Wetland and Stream Mitigation Bank

Scientific Inadequacies of Evaluating Direct, Indirect and Cumulative Impacts from Phosphate Mining in the Peace River Watershed

BMP 5.4.2: Protect /Conserve/Enhance Riparian Areas

STREAM RESTORATION PURPOSE, PRACTICE, AND METHODS. By Marcus Rubenstein, CPESC

Chapter 13: Wildlife and Vegetation

Chapter 5: Water Quality Buffer Requirements

Riparian Vegetation Protections. Heritage Tree Protection

South St. Vrain / Hall Meadows Restoration Planning August 20, 2015

The Construction General Permit and Erosion Prevention and Sedimentation Control

WETLANDS AND OPEN WATERS Compensatory Mitigation Definitions of Factors

Maintaining Riparian Areas and Wetlands

Natural and Engineered Wetlands for Stormwater Management

Oshawa Creek Watershed Management Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TEMPORARY STREAM DIVERSION

Erosion & Sedimentation Control Policy

POLICY FOR NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AREAS

Attachment C Applicant s Proposed Mitigation Statement Alaska DOT&PF Northern Region Pilot Station Airport Relocation Project POA

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT APPLICATION

Appendix B Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Requirements Checklist

Wood Canyon Emergent Wetland Project. City of Aliso Viejo 12 Journey, Suite 100 Aliso Viejo, CA 92656

No. 6 December, Wisconsin s Forestry Best Management Practices for Water Quality Forest Roads

D Olive Watershed. Path Toward Restoration

S.R. 4007, Section 14B PADEP Environmental Assessment Form. Enclosure C Description of Aquatic Habitat

Background. AEM Tier 2 Worksheet Stream & Floodplain Management. Glossary

4. Present Activities and Roles

Phase II: Proposed (regulated) Impervious in disturbed area (ac) Long Lake Existing Impervious in disturbed area (ac)

LITTLE SHADES CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT CWA Section 319(h) Nonpoint Source Implementation Grant Project Workplan #17 ADEM Contract #C

Get the Rock Out: Engineered wood structures for stream restoration. Joe Berg, Doug Streaker, Matt Koozer and Kevin Nunnery Biohabitats, Inc.

R I Freshwater Wetlands Buffer Zones

NRCS Programs and Practices for Riparian Areas in Hawaii

Upper Mississippi River. Systemic Forest Stewardship Plan. Executive Summary

Bluff Creek One Water

DRAFT CH 10 & CH 11 October 7, 2015 From: SLDCProposedAmendmentsBCCPacket part3-1Nsm

How Much Habitat Is Enough? How Much Disturbance is Too Much?

Appendix 14-I Description of Stream Crossing for Electrical Interconnect

TYPICAL CONTENTS OF A SITE-SPECIFIC NATURAL RESOURCE AND WOODLAND STAND DELINEATION MAP:

REQUIRED INFORMATION Please check the following boxes that apply to your lot or parcel and complete the other requested information.

Water Resources Program.

PRESENTERS. Contact Information: RW Armstrong Union Station, 300 S. Meridian St. Indianapolis, IN

FieldDoc.io User Guide For 2016 NFWF Chesapeake Bay Stewardship Fund Applicants

Stream Health. Stream Bugs Our Stream Health Communicators. Upper Nottawasaga River Stream Health. NVCA Science & Stewardship

Mechanical Site Preparation

5.0 SURFACE WATER CONTROL MEASURES

TEXAS WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY. Jewett Mine DS E-11 Civil Structure

RIPARIAN CORRIDOR STUDY FINAL PARLEYS CREEK MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS

7.0 WATER-BASED CONTROL MEASURES

NAR Fact Sheet Proposed Changes to Clean Water Act Regulations

Typical Local Erosion Control Requirements (Storm Water Management Authority, Inc.)

TOWN OF WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT INLAND WETLANDS & WATERCOURSES COMMISSION. 1. APPLICANT Name: Phone: Address: Cell:

Information for File # MVP SJW

BLOCKING AND FILLING SURFACE DRAINAGE DITCHES

SECTION 4.0 ALTERNATIVES

SR 202 Stream and Wetland Mitigation:

CITY OF JENKS EARTH CHANGE PERMIT APPLICATION

Final Report of the Riparian Forest Buffer Panel

Monitoring Report #3 Kenston Lake Stream Restoration Bainbridge, Ohio

Buffer Zones. November 29, RIDEM Freshwater Wetlands

GUIDE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN IN NEW BRUNSWICK

The Beckett s Run Experience. Fort Wayne, Indiana

Managing near Vernal Pools using Good Forestry in the Granite State

Ocklawaha River Restoration as Mitigation

Warren Wagon Road Improvement Project McCall Ranger District, Payette National Forest Project Description

Don t Mow. Let it Grow!

Prioritizing restoration activities for salmonid habitat within a watershed

Constructed Wetland Pond T-8

* For applicants utilizing bank for compensatory mitigation requirements, information below is not applicable.

Nonmetallic Mining Reclamation & Operation Plan. Amendment No. 1 (Includes modifications for Wash Plant construction) DRAFT

awetlands aprairie aforests ahabitat for Fish, Game & Wildlife

Chehalis Basin Strategy Programmatic SEPA Draft EIS

Operating and Reclamation Plan

FieldDoc.org User Guide For 2017 NFWF Chesapeake Bay Stewardship Fund Applicants. Background 2. Step 1: Register for a FieldDoc account 3

WATERSHED AND STREAM MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES for Lands and Waters Managed by Missouri Department of Conservation

CHATHAM PARK EXCEPTIONAL DESIGN EVALUATION

Saving Wetlands. Is saving Lives

RIPARIAN CORRIDOR STUDY FINAL CITY CREEK MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS

GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEYS IN THE PINELANDS AREA. March 25, 2006 INTRODUCTION

Wetlands Project Guidance

How to avoid getting bogged down by the Nova Scotia Wetland Conservation Policy

VEGETATIVE, WATER, FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES POLICIES

How Much Habitat is Enough?

MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD OF MANAGERS REVISIONS PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES 103D.341. Adopted April 24, 2014 Effective June 6, 2014

Transcription:

Reclamation About Mosaic Reclamation > In carrying out its mission to help the world grow the food it needs, Mosaic couples recovery of phosphate resources with respect of the phosphate-rich land that fuels thriving communities, economies and American and global food production. While mining is a temporary use of the land, reclamation offers habitat and recreational benefi ts for generations to come. Land reclamation is the process of turning mined lands back into productive use and has been required by law in Florida since 1975. In respecting this important balance, Mosaic continuously improves its reclamation practices to create natural habitats blended with other land uses across the reclaimed landscapes. November 2013 unique natural systems that are vital to the ecosystem of the Central Florida region, such as forested swamps and palmetto prairies. Reclamation also offers an opportunity to enhance the broader quality of lands that were drained or cleared for agriculture and other uses many years before mining was ever anticipated. Mosaic designs its reclamation plans from a holistic perspective, centered on creating a variety of habitats to provide for a diversity of wildlife. This allows an ecosystem to survive and grow on its own, which is the essence of a sustainable environment, and the criteria for release approved by the state. < Mosaic s dedicated team of reclamation scientists, engineers and biologists develop detailed reclamation plans for the productive use of mined lands years before any phosphate is extracted. With Mosaic reclaiming every acre or more that it disturbs, the reclamation plans focus on connecting preserved and reclaimed habitats to create a diverse and sustainable habitat network that is integrated into the larger regional ecosystem. Connecting the Science Reclaimed habitats contain streams and their associated fl oodplains, as well as connected and isolated wetland and upland natural environments. These include Mosaic designs reclaimed streams to return the systems to a more natural state. www.mosaicco.com/fl orida

Intermittent INTRODUCTION A Legacy of the Land > Proper habitat connectivity requires a comprehensive understanding of the relationships among the environments within a watershed. Among other functions, streams and floodplains connect upstream and downstream habitats. Not only are streams responsible for delivering and maintaining the proper amounts of water at the proper times to surrounding habitats, but streams also create habitat for fish and aquatic insects. Additionally, streams provide other wildlife defined and valuable corridors that connect habitats and systems vital for their survival. The two primary types of streams on Mosaic s land and in its reclamation portfolio are perennial and intermittent. Perennial streams flow continuously, while intermittent Each variety of wetland habitat contains unique plant species that require different amounts of water at the right times of year for support. streams flow only during certain times of the year typically during Florida s wet and rainy summer months. Most Central Florida streams are intermittent. Whidden Creek and Stephens Branch are two streams Mosaic created on reclaimed landscapes in Polk County, Florida, that demonstrate the importance of reclaimed intermittent streams in connecting and supporting surrounding habitats. Whidden Creek, constructed in 1996, and Stephens Branch, constructed in 2011, are also case studies that exemplify how advancements in the science of reclamation over the last decade expedite the design, development and functionality of reclaimed stream systems. < Mosaic enhances stream habitats by planting wetland sod along the banks to develop wetland floodplain systems that connect to adjacent uplands. Reclamation by Mosaic 2

DESIGN Intermittent Naturally Advancing Stream restoration and design has progressed meanders and design dimensions are determined by significantly in recent years because of the advancement classifying and assessing existing streams in order to of land-restoration science and improvements in digital mimic natural conditions, known as the reference-reach mapping, measuring and modeling technologies. Today, method. > reclaimed stream design calls for an increased level of precision. This includes providing in-stream habitat for fish and aquatic insects and corridors for connecting other habitats natural and reclaimed to allow for wildlife passage. The design is further supported by Monitoring has also documented that the streams are properly sized to match the flow patterns generated by their watersheds and store floodwaters to reduce downstream flooding. < applying sophisticated computer models that predict when and how the water will flow. Use of the Rosgen classification system is one example of the stream restoration and design advancements that Mosaic utilizes. Rosgen is a formal classification system that supports the modeling of reclaimed streams by identifying a stream s ideal channel dimensions, bed materials and size. When Whidden Creek was constructed, the practice was to grade a stream valley/floodplain area, along with the land that would drain into it, which is also known as the watershed. Then, rainfall runoff onto the watershed would flow into the stream valley and naturally carve the channel over many years. Today, this process has been accelerated by pumping water in a recirculating manner to simulate storm events and hydraulically carve the stream channel in a few months. The other method for creating functional streams is through mechanical construction. This method consists of excavating the meandering channel to the design dimensions in the stream valley and stabilizing the banks with vegetation and biodegradable fabric. The channel Rosgen stream design techniques and/or simulated flood flows ensure reclaimed stream systems provide both proper hydrological function to the systems they connect as well as valuable wildlife habitat and corridors. Reclamation by Mosaic 3

Intermittent DESIGN Design At-a-Glance Design Components Whidden Creek (1996) Stephens Branch (2011) Pre-mining Condition Shrubby, transitional, marsh system with a poorly defi ned channel. 14-acre mixed hardwood forested wetland with large cattle pond. Permeable, sandy soils with variable organic matter content. Project Timeline & Milestones Mining occurred during 1992 and 1993. Reclamation occurred during 1998. Reconnected to state waters in 2002. Released by state of Florida in 2012. Mining operations completed in 2007. Preconstruction soil and hydrology monitoring and modeling to confi rm design requirements (2008-2010). Reclamation complete in 2011. Reconnected to state waters in 2012. Currently monitoring to support future state release request. Design Methods Naturally carved stream. Mechanically constructed. Utilized reference reach and Rosgen design methods. Connectivity Aspects Headwater stream fl owing into Whidden Creek, a tributary of the Peace River, and then into Charlotte Harbor. Headwater wetland fl ows into Stephens Branch. Stephens Branch fl ows into preserved tributary of the Peace River and then into Charlotte Harbor. Drainage & Hydrology Vegetation Surrounding lakes and marsh feed the stream. Limited to surface runoff modeling. 12 acres of forested wetlands surrounding more than 25 acres of marsh. Forested headwater wetland design based on integrated surface-groundwater modeling. Groundwater monitoring to confi rm design. Drainage area, Rosgen channel and design valley slope similar to reference stream. 28-acre forested headwater wetland fl ows into Stephens Branch. Contains upland forested buffer. Reclamation by Mosaic 4

EXECUTION Intermittent Perfect Timing > Converting the designs of a reclamation plan into streams and associated habitats is accomplished by first modeling and then backfilling and grading the mined areas and developing the stream channels (mechanically or hydraulically). Next, the site is planted with native vegetation. From there, each site undergoes an extensive period of monitoring and maintenance until it is self-sustaining, meets the design criteria and can be released by the state. Backfill and grading requirements to return the mined land to the design topography are determined using computer models and advanced digital aerial imagery. Most often, sand separated from the phosphate ore matrix is pumped to provide the necessary fill volumes and properly layered with the sub-soils excavated during mining and left on site to assure proper groundwater flow. This process is known as sand tailings fill. Earthmoving equipment, typically outfitted with GPS-based technology, is used to contour sand and overburden to approved vertical tolerances as narrow as three inches. Placement of muck helps expedite the establishment of proper wetland function. Once constructed, the stream channel bed and banks are further developed by installing biodegradable erosion-control matting, which enhances stream bank stability during the vegetation-establishment process. Additionally, shallow pools are excavated to provide habitat for fish. Logs, tree stumps and leaf litter from Once the foundation has been established, Mosaic other streams are installed to provide aquatic insect often relocates topsoil from other wetland areas yet habitat. Riffles are also constructed between pools to to be mined. Known as muck, these topsoils contain provide faster flowing segments to facilitate habitat diverse seed banks, which help establish desirable native creation in the channel. vegetation and help prevent unwanted vegetation from emerging. Further, Mosaic relocates desirable native vegetation, when available, from donor sites permitted for mining. Trees and shrubs purchased from nurseries are planted and used to complete the vegetation process. Upland buffers are created surrounding stream systems to provide wildlife corridors and connectivity. With a working system in place, Mosaic then turns its stream-reclamation focus to the monitoring and maintenance of the site. Each stream and adjoining wetland is monitored to measure stream habitat and conditions, flow patterns, water quality, and the growth and development of the desirable vegetation. Removal of unwanted vegetation occurs as needed. Reclamation by Mosaic 5

EXECUTION Intermittent Over time, additional planting of trees, shrubs and groundcover is completed, if necessary, to enhance habitat creation and promote tree canopy formation, providing necessary shade for wildlife and plants. Once a site meets the criteria mapped out in the designs and permit requirements, it is ready for release. This benchmark of success, decided by the state and federal regulatory agencies overseeing a given project or site, indicates a site s ability to support itself and surrounding habitats. The time to complete these steps varies. For example, at Stephens Branch, five years elapsed between the time mining operations were completed and when the created stream met the criteria necessary to allow it to be connected to state waters. During this fiveyear period, the upland watershed was reclaimed, site hydrology data was collected to support final wetland and stream design, and the wetland and stream were graded and planted. Only one year was required after channel construction to meet Florida Class III water-quality standards and reconnect Stephens Branch to state waters. < A stream s function in the watershed is quite complex, draining and delivering water to the wetland habitats it connects and providing water to plant species within those wetland systems. In Mosaic reclamation projects, we connect stream systems with wetlands and lake systems, providing wildlife corridors and aquatic habitat to the mosquito fish and sailfin mollies seen here. Reclamation by Mosaic 6

Intermittent EXECUTION Design At-a-Glance Execution Components Whidden Creek (1996) Stephens Branch (2011) Establishing the Site s Topography Sand tailings fi ll used to create required elevation. Three-to-six inches of harvested muck topsoil. Computer modeling and digital aerial imagery are used before sand tailings fi ll volumes. Muck topsoil in wetland. Construction Methods & Techniques Creation of a large, low swale that mirrored the valley of the pre-mining stream, broadened to accommodate the development of the marsh system that would be located within the forested area. Naturally carved stream over the course of several years, a very braided, winding and sinuous channel. GPS-enabled earthmoving equipment contoured wetlands and stream valley to narrow tolerances. Sand placed in adjacent uplands to provide seepage to stream valley. Stream channel location surveyed, depth and width mechanically constructed. Stream Channel Development Overfl ow from the surrounding lakes supported the formation of the stream channel. All water that fl owed through the system to form the channel was put back into the site s water recirculation system until water-quality standards could be met. Use of biodegradable erosion control blanket to stabilize the new stream bank and silt fencing to keep upland material out of channel. Excavated pools, constructed riffl es and installed woody debris about every 50 feet to create a natural aquatic habitat. Revegetation Combination of muck and planting resulted in high density of desirable herbaceous (nonwoody) plants, including fi re fl ag, sagittaria, pickerelweed, hydrocotyle and polygonum. Established a variety of wetland trees across the stream valley, including cypress, oaks, sugar berries, sweet gums and red maples. Enhanced the function with upstream (reclaimed) buffer of coniferous pines. Used fast-growing seasonal grasses to quickly establish groundcover in adjacent uplands. Planted more than a half million wetland plants to accelerate the establishment of native vegetation. Wetland shrubs, groundcovers and trees native to the state of Florida and the South Fort Meade region were used. Surrounding upland forest buffers to the stream include oaks, pines and shrubs. Reclamation by Mosaic 7

Intermittent EXECUTION Design At-a-Glance continued Execution Components Whidden Creek (1996) Stephens Branch (2011) Establishing Water Flow & Quality Packs of leaves collected from other forested fl ood plains were placed at the beginning of Whidden Creek to spur habitat development for healthy aquatic insects, which is indicative of healthy water quality. The construction techniques used resulted in a naturally carved stream channel sized to carry the natural fl ow patterns from the contributing watershed. Headwater wetland design modeled to ensure fl ow into the stream at frequencies and volumes required to support high-quality stream habitat. Flow measurement equipment was installed to provide data comparing actual fl ow frequency, duration and volume against design criteria. Monitoring Water Quality & Vegetation Ongoing site management included vegetation and water-quality monitoring to document progression toward the reclamation objectives. Monitoring vegetation succession through annual surveys. Water quality monitored using applicable state standards. Stream channel stability monitored at permanent channel survey points. Reclamation by Mosaic 8

Intermittent SUCCESS Sustainable Success > Success of any stream reclamation project is based on measurable attributes and conditions that are equivalent to its natural counterparts, known as reference streams. A successful stream must demonstrate that the site is a self-sustaining system that provides connectivity and supports dependent habitats and species, including upland buffers (to enhance wildlife use). For reclaimed intermittent streams, success is measured by the following factors: channel stability (to minimize erosion and sediment deposits); fl ow patterns and volumes (frequency and duration of fl ow); water quality (meeting state standards to protect fi sh and other species); stream habitat conditions (branches, logs and leaves to harbor aquatic insects); and fl oodplain development (appropriate vegetation density and species composition). Streams constructed by Mosaic using both methods have been assessed and monitored by applying stream habitat and condition assessment methods developed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). These assessments demonstrate that Mosaic s created streams provide optimal functionality, including fl ow patterns, fl ood storage capacity and transport of food for downstream inhabitants (fi sh and insects). Specifi c reclamation and wetland/stream mitigation success criteria are defi ned by FDEP and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE). < Seeds contained in the harvested topsoil will begin to sprout and produce a diverse and appropriate upland plant population. Reclamation by Mosaic 9

Intermittent SUCCESS Success At-a-Glance Success Components Whidden Creek (1996) Stephens Branch (2011) Connectivity Replaced transitional marsh and poorly defi ned channel with a forested stream corridor surrounded by an upland buffer to connect surrounding lakes and marsh with Whidden Creek, which fl ows into the Peace River and Charlotte Harbor. Replaced degraded wetland, excavated pond and outlet channel with a larger forested headwater wetland, stream and adjacent upland buffer. Constructed segment of Stephens Branch connects the reclaimed wetland to the preserved segment of Stephens Branch, which fl ows into the Peace River and Charlotte Harbor. Drainage & Hydrology Site Performance Whidden Creek fl ows nearly continuously during the rainy season and less so during the dry season with periods of no fl ow, thereby meeting the defi nition of intermittent stream. Overfl ow from the surrounding lakes supported the formatting of the stream channel. All water that fl owed through the system to form the channel was put back into the site s water recirculation system until water-quality standards could be met. Flow-monitoring data confi rms Stephens Branch fl ow, frequencies, volumes and durations meet the defi nition of intermittent streams. Use of biodegradable erosion control blanket to stabilize the new stream bank and silt fencing to keep upland material out of channel. Excavated pools, constructed riffl es and installed woody debris about every 50 feet to create a natural aquatic habitat. Revegetation Successfully reached required 400 trees per acre as well as established a sustainable herbaceous understory and surrounding marsh wetlands. The aggressive management of unwanted vegetation has signifi cantly reduced any presence of the dominating vegetation at the site. Formation of woody wetland and forested upland. Organic material deposited from the woody vegetation supports additional layers of muck underneath the forested wetland, which helps maintain a healthy foundation for future growth. Met applicable state water quality standards in less than one year, allowing connection to the Peace River. After fi rst year, site has attained roughly 40 percent of target vegetation performance criteria. Stream reached a Habitat Assessment score of 124 (optimal) within one year. A total of 38 different wildlife species have been observed. They include birds, amphibians, reptiles and fi sh. Listed species are: blue heron, tricolored heron, wood stork, American alligator. Reclamation by Mosaic 10

CLOSING Intermittent Fundamental Framework of Balance > Mosaic s use of advanced design and construction tools expedites and enhances stream creation. Whidden Creek used the old technique while a viable method which achieves results at a slower rate. Stephens Branch is just one of several Mosaic streams that used the modern approach and exemplifies Mosaic s leadership in stream reclamation. These streams not only illustrate Mosaic s ability to design and construct viable stream systems, but also the company s ability to deliver selfsustaining systems that can support the larger watershed for generations to come. Additionally, reclamation of streams successfully connects upstream and downstream reclaimed sites, as well as off-site natural habitat, providing benefits for the regional ecosystem with the creation of larger contiguous blocks of native habitats. Because much of Florida s remaining natural habitats are often small, fragmented and isolated patches surrounded by converted agricultural fields or Modern reclaimed lands contain intricate stream systems that connect habitats and provide wildlife corridors. developments that restrict wildlife movement migration, reclamation offers an opportunity to reverse this trend. Today, public funding is unable to fully support expensive conservation land acquisition programs. Mining followed by reclamation of streams connecting native and reclaimed natural habitats in the manner practiced by Mosaic, many of which are protected against future disturbance by conservation easements, represents a unique concurrent scenario that contributes both to the regional economy and ecosystem. < All photos were taken at Whidden Creek, a stream system that Mosaic created on reclaimed landscapes in Polk County. Reclamation by Mosaic 11