Guidance note I Result Indicator Fiches

Similar documents
General socio-economic situation in rural areas in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in Luxembourg

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in the Puglia region

Rural Development Programmes

Rural Development Programmes

Rural Development Programmes

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in Slovenia

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in Lithuania

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in Niedersachsen and Bremen

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in the La Réunion region

SUMMARY objective evaluation relevance financial effectiveness

Rural Development Programme (RDP) of Azores, Portugal. General socio-economic situation in rural areas in the Azores region

The rural development policy : future skills needs in the agrifood

Guidance note D Hierarchy of Objectives

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in the Balearic islands

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in the Madeira region

Guidance note B Evaluation guidelines

Target indicator fiches for Pillar II (Priorities 1 to 6)

Rural Development Program of Region Veneto. AGRI E.I.4, Bruxelles, September 2007

COMMON EVALUATION QUESTIONS FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES WORKING DOCUMENT ASSESSMENT OF RDP RESULTS: HOW

Guidance note G Baseline indicators fiches

Rural Development

EU Agri-Environmental indicators and the Rural Development CMEF indicators (Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework): a coherent system of analysis

Implementation of the Lithuanian Rural Development Programme for

Synthesis of ex-post evaluations of Rural Development Programmes Presentation of the synthesis

Implementation of the Lithuanian Rural Development Programme for

European Rural Development Policy and Mountain Regions

Rural Development Programme (RDP) of Hexagone, France Le Programme de Développement Rural Hexagone 1 (Hexagone Rural Development Programme)

New Hungary Rural Development Strategic Plan

Monitoring and Evaluation for RDPs Comments from Greece

EU Rural Development Policy: Architecture and Implementation

CLLD Cooperation OFFER

OVERVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS IN LITHUANIA Legislative and institutional settings

P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 Needs to be monitored and reported by priority and focus area 2a 2b 3a 3b a b c 5a 5b 5c 5d 5e 6a 6b 6c

Schema interventi rilevanti per Priorità e Focus Area

POLAND Agriculture Policies and programmes to achieve food security and sustainable agriculture

Sowing opportunities to reap the fruits of development.

BULGARIAN RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME

Working document. Complementary Result Indicator fiches for Pillar II

COMPROMISE AMENDMENTS 1-37

Organic versus conventional farming, which performs better financially?

Rural Development. and EIP AGRI

Farm and business development

Implications of climate and energy policy on the agricultural and forestry sectors

Aus dem Institut für Marktanalyse und Agrarhandelspolitik

Factsheet on Rural Development Programme for Latvia

Knowledge transfer and information actions

EU milk margin index estimate up to 2018

Building Partnerships for Technology Generation, Assessment and Sharing in Agriculture among West Balkan Countries

ROMANIA. (The text of this summary sheet was finalised in September 2010 in accordance with the version of the RDP that was current at this time)

RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (RDP) OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA. Integration of Environmental and Climate Policy into the RDP

FRANCE MIDI-PYRÉNÉES

DG AGRI D.1-Transparency/ Working Document Rev6 Ares(2018) /04/2018 DESCRIPTION OF MEASURES

Approaches in using common Rural Development indicators in regional RDPs

RDP Budget Analysis. TG Smart & Competitive Rural Areas. Elena Maccioni, ENRD CP Brussels, 18/11/15

Contribution of the EU agricultural policy to climate change mitigation

CLLD Cooperation OFFER

QUESTIONS FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES JUNE 2015 WORKING DOCUMENT COMMON EVALUATION QUESTIONS FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT MARCH 2015

CLLD Cooperation OFFER

Midterm evaluation of the Swedish Rural Development Programme

Giving a new boost to a unique land

FOOD, NUTRITION AND FOOD SECURITY

CLLD Cooperation OFFER

2. Intervention logic 2.1 The intervention logic of rural development policy in

10695/15 GDLC/ld 1 DGB 1B

Study on Employment, Growth and Innovation in Rural Areas (SEGIRA)

Opportunities within the Rural Development Policy

Climate Change and Renewable Energy issues in RDP

WP3.3 Model development and adaptation RD Modelling and model link

EU Milk Margin Estimate up to 2016

THE DISTRIBUTION OF FARM PERFORMANCE: DRAFT TERMS OF REFERENCE

S P A I N COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY

Average farm size ha UAA/holding (3) 4.0. Planned total public expenditure: EUR

The MEDUSA project - Agriculture

Wawrzyniec Czubak

EU Milk Margin Estimate up to 2015

THE RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME A SUMMARY

EU forest-related policy framework. Marius Lazdinis Unit Bioenergy, biomass, forestry, and climate change, DG Agriculture and Rural Development

THE ON GOING EVALUATION OF THE NATIONAL RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME DURING

Developing competitive supply chains. Reve Lambur Estonian NRN

Table of Contents. Synthesis. DRAFT Landing Page for Feeder Study on Livestock systems

The new CAP A new era of evidence-based policy making? ÖGA Annual Conference an REECAP Workshop Franz Sinabell 27. Sept 2018

European Rural Development Policy. Possibilities for Social Farming? By Johan Verstrynge Department of Agriculture and Fisheries

( ) Page: 1/14 NOTIFICATION

Use of Grasslands in the Republic of Serbia

Average farm size ha UAA/holding (3) 4.0. Planned total public expenditure: EUR

FUTURE CHALLENGES AND STRATEGIES FOR SMALLHOLDERS IN SERBIA. Dr Srđan Stojanović 1) Dragan Mirković, dvm 2)

Role of Teagasc and Activities in Rural Development

European Union Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

Financial instruments in rural development : programming and policy elements

Annex III to Doc CPSA/SB/692 Explanation of uses of the FSS data

EXPERIENCE FROM THE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES - AUSTRIA Brussels, 23 th March 2016

RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA

Innovation in Agriculture:

Estimated Economic Impact of Agriculture, Food, and Food Processing Sectors 9/8/2016

Average farm size ha UAA/holding (3) 4.7. Planned total public expenditure: EUR

Policy to promote quality and diversity in Emilia-Romagna (Italy) Malavolta Carlo D.G. Agricoltura, Regione Emilia-Romagna, Bologna, Italy.

Agricultural Economic Development Plan

EU agricultural research and innovation From Horizon 2020 to FP9

EU Milk Margin Estimate up to 2013

Transcription:

Guidance note I Result Indicator Fiches This guidance note presents a fiche for each result in the CMEF. Each fiche contains the following elements: Type of Measure Code Definition of the Subdivision Unit of measurement Responsible actor for collection method/good practice Source S (CMEF) Axis/Objective Improving the competitiveness of the agricultural and forestry sector Improving the environment and the countryside through land management Improving the quality of life in rural areas and encouraging diversification of economic activity Indicator (1) Number of participants that successfully ended a training activity related to agriculture and/or forestry (2) Increase in agricultural gross value added in supported farms (3) Number of holdings introducing new products and/or new techniques (4) Value of agricultural production under recognized quality label/standards (5) Number of farms entering the market (6) Area under successful land management contributing to: (a) bio diversity and high nature value farming/forestry (b) water quality (c) mitigating climate change (d) soil quality (e) avoidance of marginalisation and land abandonment (7) Increase in non-agricultural gross value added in supported businesses (8) Gross number of jobs created (9) Additional number of tourists (10) Population in rural areas benefiting from improved services (11) Increase in internet penetration in rural areas (12) Number of participants that successfully ended a training activity I. Result Indicator Fiches EN.doc 1

AXIS 1 IMPROVING THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY SECTOR 01. NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS THAT SUCCESSFULLY ENDED A TRAINING ACTIVITY RELATED TO AGRICULTURE AND/OR FORESTRY Type of Result for axis 1, subsection 1 (improving the competitiveness of the agricultural and forestry sector by promoting knowledge and improving human potential) Vocational training and information actions, including diffusion of scientific knowledge and innovative practises, for persons engaged in the agricultural, food and forestry sectors (Article 20 (a) (i) of Reg. (EC) N 1698/2005) Measure Code 111 Definition of the Subdivision What is a successfully ended training result? A first condition is that the participant must have ended the full training session/ programme. Than a successful result can be: - Receiving a (quality)certificate, degree or diploma after finishing the training - Applying the achieved skills in practice. Examples: o Reconversion o Alternative activities o Improving production methods (e.g. using new machine that rationalises production) o Introducing more ICT applications for the management of the farm (e.g. bookkeeping, ) o Introducing environmental methods/ practices Division according to: gender (male/female) age category - age < 40-40 age type of successful result - passing by achieving certificate, degree or diploma - implementing the achieved skills type of participants - participants engaged in farming - participants engaged in food industry - participants engaged in forestry Unit of measurement Unique number of persons I. Result Indicator Fiches EN.doc 2

Responsible actor for collection method/good practice Project level Project managers. Measure managers will collect and centralize the data of all project managers. - of farmers/ forest holders that achieved (quality)certificate, degree or diploma after training activity: if relevant the final result of the training can be registered in a central training database (created and managed by the responsible measure manager). This database contains all relevant information related to this measure (see also output fiche n 1). This information can be obtained by adding an extra section on the registration form concerning the en result of the training activity : passed, failed, degree, certificate, This section needs to be filled in by the project manager after each training activity. - method for measuring the degree of implementation of new skills: through a survey of the farmers and forest holders that participated in training activities. Source - Training database of the responsible measure manager, containing all the information as indicated above. - Survey - If successful result is achieving a (quality) certificate, a degree or a diploma: after each training session - if successful result is implementation of new skills: surveys should at least be held in function of the evaluation moments of rural development programmes (mid term, ex post) I. Result Indicator Fiches EN.doc 3

AXIS 1 IMPROVING THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY SECTOR 02. INCREASE IN GROSS VALUE ADDED IN SUPPORTED HOLDINGS/ENTERPRISES Type of Result for axis 1, subsection 1 (improving the competitiveness of the agricultural and forestry sector by promoting knowledge and improving human potential) Setting up of young farmers Early retirement Use of advisory services Setting up of farm management, farm relief and farm advisory services Farm modernisation Improving the economic value of forests Adding value to agricultural and forestry products Cooperation for development of new products processes and technologies in the agriculture and food sector and in the forestry sector Improving and developing infrastructure related to the development and adaptation of agriculture and forestry Helping farmers to adapt to demanding standards based on community legislation Measure Code 112-113 -114-115-121-122-123-124-125-131 Definition of the Subdivision This measures the increase in gross value added (GVA) of agricultural, food or forestry holdings/enterprises that are supported. Important is that we measure the gross effect. This means that it can be possible that a change in GVA over different years can also be explained by other factors than the received support. To measure the GVA of the supported holdings/enterprises, we use the following proxy: the average profit after taxes of assisted holdings/enterprises = turnover - costs whereby: - costs = o direct inputs: seed, plants, fertilizer, animal feed, energy, water, contract work, o + overheads: maintenance and depreciation of buildings and machinery, insurances, other o + labor costs o + rent o + interest - turnover = Value of sales - bonuses given on sales - taxes on sales This needs to be compared over different years to see its evolution Division according to: I. Result Indicator Fiches EN.doc 4

measure type of sector: - agriculture - food industry - forestry Unit of measurement Responsible actor for collection method/good practice Source euro project level (for each supported holding) or measure level depending on the sources used Measure managers will collect and centralize the necessary financial data of the supported holdings. Collect per supported holding the costs and revenues as defined above. This information can be found in the bookkeeping of all holdings. formula: ( revenues - costs)/ number of supported holdings There are a few possible sources for the bookkeeping information: - FADN (Farm Accountancy Data Network), - national/regional accounts or statistics, national farm accountancy network - survey: contacting the individual supported holdings for the information (information can be included in the application form) Per application for support and upon completion of the project Surveys should at least be scheduled in function of the evaluation moments of rural development programmes (mid term, ex post) I. Result Indicator Fiches EN.doc 5

AXIS 1 IMPROVING THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY SECTOR 03. NUMBER OF HOLDINGS/ENTERPRISES INTRODUCING NEW PRODUCTS AND/OR NEW TECHNIQUES Type of Result for axis 1, sub-section 2 (improving the competitiveness of the agricultural and forestry sector - restructuring physical potential and promoting innovation) Modernisation of farms Improving the economic value of forests Adding value to agricultural and forestry products Cooperation for development of new products, processes and technologies Measure Code 121-122-123-124 Definition of the Subdivision Introducing new products or techniques consists of a redeployment of the production, i.e. changes in land use or in agricultural practices that lead to a change in the composition of the basic agricultural products. With this we don t measure the number of holdings/enterprises receiving investment support but the number of holdings/enterprises where the investment support led to the introduction of a new technique or product. Division according to: Measure Type of holding/enterprise - Agricultural holding - forestry holding - food enterprise type of redeployment of production: - new technique - new product I. Result Indicator Fiches EN.doc 6

Unit of measurement Responsible actor for collection method/good practice Source Number of holdings Measure level Measure manager Introducing a monitoring system that allows to keep track of the supported farmer, forestry and food enterprises that received investment support (e.g. application forms introduced in a database). To measure the a survey can be conducted among the supported holdings/enterprises 2 years after the investment support was granted. Database of the responsible measure manager, containing all the information as indicated above. Per application for support and upon completion of the project. The surveys should at least be scheduled in function of the evaluation moments of rural development programmes (mid term, ex post) I. Result Indicator Fiches EN.doc 7

AXIS 1 IMPROVING THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY SECTOR 04. VALUE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION UNDER RECOGNIZED QUALITY LABEL/ STANDARDS Type of Result for axis 1, sub-section 3 (improving the quality of agricultural production and products) Meeting standards based on Community legislation Supporting farmers who participates in food quality schemes Supporting producer groups for information and promotion activities for products under food quality schemes Measure Code 131-132-133 Definition of the Subdivision Value expressed as total market value (=selling value: P*Q) of the agricultural production under recognized quality label/ standards and supported through the related measures Recognized label/ standard can be: - European label/ standard - Member State label/ standard Division according to: Measure Type of label/standard: - European label/standard - Member State label/standard Type of agricultural product involved (Cfr. regulations 509/2006/EC and 510/2006/EC) - Fresh meat (and offal) - Meat based products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.) - Cheeses - Other products of animal origin (eggs, milk products excl. butter etc.) - Oils and fats (butter, margarine, oils, etc.) - Fruits, vegetables, cereals, whether or not processed - Beer - Beverages made from plant extracts - Bread, pastry, cakes, confectionery, biscuits and other baker's wares - Other food products Unit of measurement Responsible actor for million Euro Measure level Measure manager I. Result Indicator Fiches EN.doc 8

collection method/good practice Source Calculate the total sales value of the production sold under label For European quality labels: - protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (regulation 2081/92/EEC) - certificates of specific character for agricultural products and foodstuffs (regulation 2082/92/EEC) - organic production of agricultural products and indications referring thereto on agricultural products and foodstuffs (2092/91/EEC) - title IV on quality wine in specified regions of regulation 1493/1999/EEC For Member State quality labels, one has to consult the responsible organisation(s) for issuing such labels. (Examples: British Retailer Consortium (BRC) or the German International Food Standard (IFS)). The products found in this way, have to be multiplied by the standard tariffs for these products to obtain the value of the agricultural products concerned. There are different sources for prices. - FADN-RICA database (site: http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/rica/index_en.cfm) - the statistical website of DG Agriculture: http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/agrista/2004/table_en/332.pdf. - Eurostat Agricultural prices and price indices Per application for support and upon completion of the project. The surveys should at least be scheduled in function of the evaluation moments of rural development programmes (mid term, ex post) I. Result Indicator Fiches EN.doc 9

AXIS 1 IMPROVING THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY SECTOR 05. NUMBER OF FARMS ENTERING THE MARKET Type of Result for axis 1, sub-section 4 (transitional measures) Semi-subsistence farming Setting up of producer groups Measure Code 141-142 Definition of the This measures the number of farms in the new Member States that enter the market, meaning that they evolved from a (semi) subsistence farm to an income generating market player. Subdivision - Unit of measurement Responsible actor for collection method/good practice Source Unique number of farm holdings Measure level Measure manager Follow up the supported (semi) subsistence farms to monitor whether they enter the market and count the farms that actually entered the market. A survey will probably be necessary. Database of the responsible measure manager, containing all the information on the supported (semi) subsistence farms. Per application for support and upon completion of the project. The surveys should at least be scheduled in function of the evaluation moments of rural development programmes (mid term, ex post) I. Result Indicator Fiches EN.doc 10

AXIS 2 IMPROVING THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE COUNTRYSIDE 06. AREA UNDER SUCCESSFUL LAND MANAGEMENT CONTRIBUTING TO: A) BIO DIVERSITY AND HIGH NATURE VALUE FARMING/FORESTRY B) WATER QUALITY C) CLIMATE CHANGE D) SOIL QUALITY E) AVOIDANCE OF MARGINALISATION AND LAND ABANDONMENT Type of Result of axis 2 All measures of axis 2 Measure Code 211-212-213-214-215-216-221-222-223-224-225-226-227 The measures the total amount of hectares under successful land management. Successful land management is defined as the successful completion of land management actions contributing to : Definition of the - improvement of biodiversity o protection of wildlife species or groups of species o maintain reintroduce crop-combinations o safeguarding endangered animal breeds and plant varieties - improvement of water quality o decrease in concentration of nutrients, phosphorous and/or pesticides o reduced use of chemical fertilizers o reduced life stock density o improved nitrogen balance o reducing the transport of pollutants to aquifers - mitigating climate change - improvement of soil quality: o reduction of erosion (water/wind/tillage) o less water logging o reduction or prevention of chemical contamination (less use of plant nutrient/manure, plant protection substances, ) o stabilising and enhancing the level of soil organic matter through the use of appropriate sources of stable organic matter and, where appropriate, through reduced tillage - Avoidance of marginalisation and land abandonment Subdivision Division according to: Measure Type of contribution - Improvement of biodiversity - Improvement of water quality - Mitigating climate change I. Result Indicator Fiches EN.doc 11

- Improvement of soil quality - Avoidance of marginalisation and land abandonment Unit of measurement Responsible actor for collection method/good practice number of Ha Measure level Measure manager/programme manager Where possible using existing statistic sources at the lowest disaggregated level possible (regional, sub-regional, local). In this way the data can be linked as much as possible to the supported area. If no data are available: - Empirical tests on the supported land with respect to: o biodiversity o water quality o climate change o soil quality - survey of supported forest/ farm holders Source - national/regional statistics; - EUROFARM (cf., Annex 1 to Commission decision 98/377/EC) - EUROSTAT "Les indices de Ruralité et de développement rural" - on-farm observation (interview, sample, case study ); - RDP monitoring data (output s) Per application for support and upon completion of the project. In case of multi-annual commitments, registration should at least be scheduled in function of the evaluation moments of rural development programmes (mid term, ex post) I. Result Indicator Fiches EN.doc 12

AXIS 3 IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN RURAL AREAS AND ENCOURAGING DIVERSIFICATION OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITY 07. INCREASE IN NON-AGRICULTURAL GROSS VALUE ADDED IN SUPPORTED BUSINESSES Type of Result for axis 3, subsection 1 (promote the diversification of rural economy) Diversification into non-agricultural activities Business creation and development Encouragement of tourism activities Measure Code 311-312-313 This measures the increase in non-agricultural gross value added (GVA) of supported businesses. This means that it can be possible that a change in GVA over different years can also be explained by other factors than the received support. To measure the GVA of the supported enterprises, we use the following proxy: the average profit after taxes of assisted holdings = turnover - costs whereby: - costs = Definition of the o direct inputs: energy, water, contract work, o + overheads: maintenance and depreciation of buildings and machinery, insurances, other o + labor costs o + rent o + interest - turnover = Value of sales/services - bonuses given on sales - taxes on sales This needs to be compared over different years to see its evolution Subdivision - per measure - per type of holding: o agricultural holding o other enterprises I. Result Indicator Fiches EN.doc 13

Unit of measurement Responsible actor for collection method/good practice Source euro project level (for each supported holding) or measure level depending on the sources used Measure managers will collect and centralize the necessary financial data of the supported holdings and enterprises. Collect per supported holding the costs and revenues as defined above. This information can be found in the bookkeeping of all holdings. formula: ( revenues - costs)/ number of supported holdings There are a few possible sources for the bookkeeping information: - FADN (Farm Accountancy Data Network), National Accountancy Databases - national/regional accounts or statistics, national farm accountancy network - survey: contacting the individual supported holdings for the information (information can be included in the application form) Per application for support and upon completion of the project. The surveys should at least be scheduled in function of the evaluation moments of rural development programmes (mid term, ex post) I. Result Indicator Fiches EN.doc 14

AXIS 3 IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN RURAL AREAS AND ENCOURAGING DIVERSIFICATION OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITY 08. GROSS NUMBER OF JOBS CREATED Type of Result of axis 3, sub-section 1 (improving the quality of life in rural areas and encouraging diversification of economic activity diversification of the rural economy) Result of axis 4, sub-section 1 (to implement the Leader approach in mainstream rural development programming) Diversification into non-agricultural activities Business creation and development Encouragement of tourism activities All Leader measures Measure Code 311-312-313 I. Result Indicator Fiches EN.doc 15

Definition of the The measures the gross increase of employment expressed in number of new jobs related to the assisted actions. Nevertheless gross means that not all new jobs are a direct result of this assistance. The increase of jobs is also likely to be influenced by several exogenous factors like economic trends, other structural aid, and the general socio-economic situation of the region. Subdivision Division of new jobs created according to: - on farm versus off farm jobs: - on farm jobs created by assisted actions o agri-tourism o craft o retail o renewable energy production o other - off farm jobs created by assisted actions o tourism o craft o retail o renewable energy production o other - gender (male/ female) - age category - age < 25-25 age - Leader o Axis 1 o Axis 2 o Axis 3 - I. Result Indicator Fiches EN.doc 16

Unit of measurement Responsible actor for collection method/good practice Source number of jobs created Project level Project manager/coordinators of local action groups, centralized by measure managers and programme manager Monitoring of the supported operations: each beneficiary can be asked the number of new jobs since the support was granted (e.g. two years later). Since the measures a gross effect the beneficiary doesn t need to know how many jobs were created as a direct result of the support. The data must be centralized by the measure managers and the programme manager. Alternatively, labour market statistics by sector and region can be used as a source. Survey Per application for support and upon completion of the project. The surveys should at least be scheduled in function of the evaluation moments of rural development programmes (mid term, ex post). I. Result Indicator Fiches EN.doc 17

AXIS 3 IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN RURAL AREAS AND ENCOURAGING DIVERSIFICATION OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITY 09. ADDITIONAL NUMBERS OF TOURIST VISITS Type of Result of axis 3, sub-section 1 (improving the quality of life in rural areas and encouraging diversification of economic activity diversification of the rural economy) Encouragement of tourism activities Measure Code 313 Definition of the the measures the additional number of tourist visits in the rural area due to the supported tourism investments Subdivision Division according to : Number of overnight stays (hotels,..) Number of day visitors (tourism facilities, recreational activities.) Unit of measurement Responsible actor for collection method/good practice Number of tourist visits Project level Project manager/measure manager Monitoring of number of visits of the supported tourism infrastructure in a database. Source monitoring by project manager, centralized by measure manager Per application for support and upon completion of the project. The surveys should at least be scheduled in function of the evaluation moments of rural development programmes (mid term, ex post) I. Result Indicator Fiches EN.doc 18

AXIS 3 IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN RURAL AREAS AND ENCOURAGING DIVERSIFICATION OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITY 10. POPULATION IN RURAL AREAS BENEFITING FROM IMPROVED SERVICES Type of Result of axis 3, sub-section 2 (improving the quality of life in rural areas and encouraging diversification of economic activity to improve basic services) Basic services for the economy and rural population Village renewal and development Conservation and upgrading of the rural heritage Measure Code 321-322-323 Definition of the The measures the number of people in rural areas that benefit from improved services. Subdivision - Unit of measurement Responsible actor for collection method/good practice Source Unique number of persons Project level Project manager/measure manager Population in supported areas under the above mentioned measures. Project managers could be asked to indicate in their applications the size of the population and/or the area benefiting from their project. National, regional statistics (National Institute of Statistics, ) and application forms Per application for support and upon completion of the project. The surveys should at least be scheduled in function of the evaluation moments of rural development programmes (mid term, ex post) I. Result Indicator Fiches EN.doc 19

AXIS 3 IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN RURAL AREAS AND ENCOURAGING DIVERSIFICATION OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITY 11. INCREASE IN INTERNET PENETRATION IN RURAL AREAS Type of Result of axis 3, sub-section 2 (improving the quality of life in rural areas and encouraging diversification of economic activity to improve basic services) Basic services for the economy and rural population Measure Code 321 Definition of the Internet penetration can be expressed as the population that has access to (broadband) internet connections Subdivision - Unit of measurement Responsible actor for collection method/good practice Source Unique number of persons measure level Project manager/measure manager Compare internet penetration in the supported areas the year before and the year after the support and make the difference for each supported area. National, regional statistics: in each country there exist different studies and statistics on the internet penetration. The more local the data are available the better the link can be made between internet penetration and the supported areas. The project managers could be asked to indicate the area in which they will operate. Per application for support and upon completion of the project. The surveys should at least be scheduled in function of the evaluation moments of rural development programmes (mid term, ex post) I. Result Indicator Fiches EN.doc 20

AXIS 3 IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN RURAL AREAS AND ENCOURAGING DIVERSIFICATION OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITY 12. NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS THAT SUCCESSFULLY ENDED A TRAINING ACTIVITY Type of Result of axis 3, sub-section 3 (improving the quality of life in rural areas and encouraging diversification of economic activity diversification of the rural economy) Training and information for economic actors operating in the field of covered by axis 3 Skills acquisition and animation with a view to preparing and implementing a local development strategy Measure Code 331-341 Definition of the Subdivision What is a successfully ended training? A first condition is that the participant must have ended the full training session/ programme. Than a successful result can be: - Receiving a (quality)certificate, degree or diploma after finishing the training - Applying the achieved skills in practice The participants of training activities that we include in the are economic actors operating in the field of axis 3 and staff involved with preparation and implementation of local development programmes. Division of according to: gender (male/female) age category - age < 25-25 age I. Result Indicator Fiches EN.doc 21

Unit of measurement Responsible actor for collection method/good practice Unique number of persons Project level Project managers. Measure managers will collect and centralize the data of all project managers. - of participants in training activities that achieved (quality)certificate, degree or diploma after training activity: if relevant the final result of the training can be registered in a central training database (created and managed by the responsible measure manager). This database contains all relevant information related to this measure (see also output fiche n 57). This information can be obtained by adding an extra section on the registration form concerning the end result of the training activity : passed, failed, degree, certificate, This section needs to be filled in by the project manager after each training activity ends. - method for measuring the degree of implementation of new skills: through a survey of the participants that participated in a training activities. Source - Training database of the responsible measure manager, containing all the information as indicated above. - Survey - If successful result is achieving a (quality) certificate, a degree or a diploma: after each training session - if successful result is implementation of new skills: surveys should at least be held in function of the evaluation moments of rural development programmes (mid term, ex post) I. Result Indicator Fiches EN.doc 22