DNA Mixture Interpretation Workshop Karin Crenshaw. Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics

Similar documents
Procedure for Casework DNA Interpretation

STR Interpretation Guidelines

DNA Mixture Interpretation Workshop Michael D. Coble, PhD. Current SWGDAM Guidelines

Design and Execution of Validation Studies for Establishing DNA Mixture Interpretation Procedures

Exploring the Capabilities of Mixture Interpretation Using True Allele Software

Mixture Interpretation

STRmix Implementation and Internal Validation-FUSION. Erie County Central Police Services Forensic Laboratory

Centre of Forensic Sciences

Virginia and the New SWGDAM Guidelines

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters.

STRmix Implementation and Internal Validation Erie County Central Police Services Forensic Laboratory

AmpF STR NGM PCR Amplification Kit - Overview

Mathematics of Forensic DNA Identification

DNA 101. DNA 101:Kate Philpott and Jennifer Friedman

Procedure for Casework Report Writing

TWO YEARS LATER: A REFLECTION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF STRMIX IN A HIGH THROUGHPUT DNA LABORATORY

forensim: an open source initiative for method evaluation in forensic genetics

Procedure for Casework Report Writing

STR Profiling Matching Criteria: Establishment and Importance of a Cell Line Database

Genetic Identity. Steve Harris SPASH - Biotechnology

Procedure for Casework Report Writing

DNA MIXTURES AND RE- INTERPRETATION O C C R I M E L A B O R A T O R Y, D N A S E C T I O N E L I Z A B E T H T H O M P S O N A P R I L 3,

Enhanced Resolution and Statistical Power Through SNP Distributions Within the Short Tandem Repeats

DNA identification: The statistics behind match probabilities. STAT 100: Statistical Thinking Jan - Apr term 2010 Dr.

DNA Mixture Interpretation Workshop Dr Chris Maguire. Identification and resolution of DNA mixtures

Upgrading the Workflow: Enhancing Information Recovery from Forensic Evidence. The world leader in serving science

JS 190- Population Genetics- Assessing the Strength of the Evidence Pre class activities

FORENSIC GENETICS. DNA in the cell FORENSIC GENETICS PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION KINSHIP ANALYSIS FORENSIC GENETICS. Sources of biological evidence

Standard for Forensic DNA Interpretation and Comparison Protocols

Commonwealth v. Lyons. Cybergenetics How TrueAllele Works (Part 2) Degraded DNA and Allele Dropout. Cybergenetics Webinar November, 2014

Guide to STR Interpretation - mixtures and allelic artefacts. Peter Gill

Evaluation of forensic evidence in DNA mixture using RMNE. Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License

AFDAA 2012 Winter Meeting Population Statistics Refresher Course Lecture-4: Statistics for Lineage Markers Ranajit Chakraborty, PhD Professor,

Forensic DNA Testing. Forensic DNA Testing. Maj Gen (R) Suhaib Ahmed, HI (M)

ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARY FOR TESTING IN 2001 Prepared by the Parentage Testing Program Unit October 2002

Sources of Computational Error in Probabilistic Genotyping Software Used for DNA Mixture Interpretation

TrueAllele Casework on Virginia DNA Mixture Evidence: Computer and Manual Interpretation in 72 Reported Criminal Cases

STR DNA Data Analysis. Genetic Analysis

From Training to Trial: A Reflection on Nearly Three Years of Probabilistic Genotyping

Implementation of MPS into a Specialist Casework Laboratory. David Ballard

Empirical Analysis of the STR Profiles Resulting from Conceptual Mixtures

Mutations during meiosis and germ line division lead to genetic variation between individuals

Understanding PCR. Total allelic product Peak height Back stutter Forward stutter Variability in peak height

The Evolution of Short Tandem Repeat (STR) Multiplex Systems

Biology 445K Winter 2007 DNA Fingerprinting

Book chapter appears in:

GlobalFiler TM Extra Cycle Evaluation Report

DNA Typing for the Identification of Korean War Victims

Essential Elements of a Defense-Review of DNA Testing Results

General DNA Information

Forensic Applications of CE and MPS

The ABCs & 123s of DNA Testing

Developing criteria and data to determine best options for expanding the core CODIS loci

Statement on minor miscoding in BN Formulae STRmix 1.08 with additional comments. Statement relating to STRmix miscodes

Allele frequencies for 12 autosomal short tandem repeat loci in two bolivian populations

Internal Validation of the Promega PowerPlex Fusion System with the Applied Biosystems 3130xl Genetic Analyzer

Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

What is DNA? Deoxyribonucleic Acid The inherited genetic material that makes us what we are

DNA Expert Witness. Nuclear DNA 10/23/14. Adams County Bar Association. DNA found in the nucleus of the cell is called nuclear DNA.

Essential Elements of a Defense-Review of DNA Testing Results

Evaluation of Genome wide SNP Haplotype Blocks for Human Identification Applications

Developmental Validation of Amplicon Rx, a post-pcr Purification System

Report of Analyzing Short Tandem Repeats for Parentage Testing

Mixture Interpretation Issues & Insights

Calculating the Weight of Evidence in Low-Template Forensic DNA Casework*

Product Catalog 2012 AmplGen Ltd.

Computational Methods for the Objective Review of Forensic DNA Testing Results

RESULTS FROM THE 1999 NIST MIXED-STAIN STUDY #2: DNA QUANTITATION, DIFFERENTIAL EXTRACTION, AND IDENTIFICATION OF THE UNKNOWN CONTRIBUTORS

p and q can be thought of as probabilities of selecting the given alleles by

!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"

Notice of Amendment of the FBI s STR Population Data Published in 1999 and 2001

John M. Butler and Peter M. Vallone National Institute of Standards and Technology

Biology/DNA DNA Interpretation SOP. Biology/DNA Division

A Rape on a Minor Victim Under POCSO Act 2012 Investigation Through DNA Analysis Technique A Case Study

Allele frequencies in Azuay Population in Ecuador

Validation of the MinElute Post PCR Cleanup System

Transcript of Dr. Mark Perlin s talk on Combining DNA Evidence for Greater Match Information

Edexcel (B) Biology A-level

Procedure for GeneMapper ID-X for Casework

PowerSeq 46GY System Eases the transition to MPS for forensic laboratories

Advances and New Technologies in Forensic DNA

PowerPlex Fusion 6C System

Establishing the Limits of TrueAllele â Casework: A Validation Study

AmpFlSTR Identifiler PCR Amplification Kit

Procedure for GeneMapper ID-X for Casework

Interpretation of Mixtures Based on Peak Area - Identification of Genetic Anomalies, Stutters and Other Artefacts

Authenticating human cell lines using the Identifiler kits and capillary electrophoresis platforms

If you have any queries or problems, please do not hesitate to contact us.

GeneMarker HID Expert System Human Identification Software with Linked Post-Identification Database Search, Kinship, and DNA Mixture Applications

If you have any queries or problems, please do not hesitate to contact us.

LAB ACTIVITY ONE POPULATION GENETICS AND EVOLUTION 2017

Get more information from challenging samples with next-generation sequencing of short tandem repeats

5/18/2017. Genotypic, phenotypic or allelic frequencies each sum to 1. Changes in allele frequencies determine gene pool composition over generations

The injection of the 28 and 29 PCR cycle data was performed at 3kV for 10 and 5 seconds.

VALIDATION OF PROMEGA S POWERPLEX 16 FOR PATERNITY TESTING

Laboratory Validation. Chapter 16

QIAGEN Validation Report

Product Information and Testing. Product Information. X AMK AMK Quality Assurance Signed by: University of Wisconsin Laboratory of Anita Bhattacharyya

AP BIOLOGY Population Genetics and Evolution Lab

This Conference brought to you by:

Transcription:

DNA Mixture Interpretation Workshop Karin Crenshaw Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics

Overview Types of Mixtures Options for Reporting Mixtures RMP, PE, or Likelihood Ratio Stochastic Alleles Report Wording Practical Examples from P.B.S.O. Questions DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 2

What is a Mixture? According to the SWGDAM Interpretation Guidelines: When three or more alleles are present at one or more loci (excepting tri-allelic loci) and/or the peak height ratios between a single pair of allelic peaks for one or more loci are below the empirically determined heterozygous peak height ratio expectation. Generally, the minimum number of contributors to a mixed sample can be determined based on the locus that exhibits the greatest number of allelic peaks. DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 3

Factors Involved in Mixture Analysis Stochastic Threshold Stochastic Range DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics Analytical Threshold 4

Types of Mixtures: No two Mixtures are exactly alike.requires Validation Studies and proper training to interpret properly Major/Minor with the alleles all above the stochastic threshold. No Major/Minor with alleles all above the stochastic threshold. Mixtures with alleles that fall below the stochastic threshold. Also includes mixture with more than three individuals that are indistinguishable. DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 5

Options for Reporting Mixtures: Give qualitative statement (exclusions) with no statistic The known individual cannot be excluded (is included) as a possible contributor, can choose from: Calculate RMP on Major profile or Restricted RMP Calculate probability of exclusion (CPE), or Restricted CPE for multiple major contributors Calculate likelihood ratio (LR) Report result as inconclusive or uninterpretable The DNA profile is consistent or inconsistent with originating from a common source. For court purposes it is necessary to provide a statistic if an inclusion is being made DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 6

2-Step Process for Reporting Results: Step 1 = Determine type of mixture, decide on the appropriate statistical approach, the loci that will be used in the calculation, and calculate the statistic. Step 2 = Compare to the known DNA profiles, determine inclusions/exclusions, write wording for report. DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 7

What Type of Statistical Calculation Should Be Performed? Answer depends on the type of mixture RMP (Random Match Probability) Major profile or Deduced Profile from Intimate Sample, Mixtures with assumption of number of contributors CPE (Combined Probability of Exclusion) Non-distinguishable mixture profile or Minor profile LR (Likelihood Ratio) Mixtures with assumed number of contributors and only alleles above stochastic are utilized DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 8

RMP (Random Match Probability) Used consistently for Single Source profiles Can also be used for Major DNA profile from a mixture. Intimate Samples given the reference standard of the owner, the other contributor can be deduced out and treated as single source profile. Indistinguishable Mixtures must assume the number of contributors, then can use data that falls below stochastic threshold. DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 9

RMP Calculations For a single major contributor to a mixture Heterozygote Genotype = 2pq Homozygote Genotype = p 2 + p(1-p)θ For single alleles where the allele falls below the stochastic threshold, have several formula options available or can just not use the locus in statistical calculations DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 10

Application of RMP to Indistinguishable Mixtures (Modified RMP): Acceptable as long as the assumption as to the number of contributors is clearly noted. Can apply a restricted approach, utilizing the peak height ratio information to eliminate certain allelic combinations from the calculations. This approach will allow the use of stochastic alleles under certain conditions DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 11

General Report Wording for Modified RMP: Assuming N number of contributors, the probability of randomly selecting an unrelated individual who could be included as a contributor to the mixture obtained from a swabbing/cutting/etc. of the item (Exhibit X.QX) is listed below for the following populations: 1 in X (billion, trillion, etc.) US Caucasians 1 in X (billion, trillion, etc.) US African Americans 1 in X (billion, trillion, etc.) US Southwest Hispanics *Note: Wording provided by Todd Bille DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 12

CPE (Combined Probability of Exclusion) or CPI (Combined Probability of Inclusion) Also known as RMNE (Random Man Not Excluded) Probability that a random person (unrelated individual) would be excluded as a contributor to the observed DNA mixture Does not require an assumption as to the number of contributors to the mixture Assumes that there is no allele dropout (All alleles are above the stochastic threshold) All contributors are unrelated All contributors come from the same population group Does not utilize all of the data s probative value DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 13

Uses of CPE/CPI If major/minor contributors can not be determined based on unambiguous profiles For the minor contributor to a mixture, using all of the alleles present for each locus that does not have stochastic alleles, unless a restricted approach is used for multiple major contributors If the number of contributors cannot be determined DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 14

Calculating CPE/CPI PI= (sum of allele frequencies) 2 for each locus CPI = PI 1 * PI 2 *.PI N CPE = 1 CPI Unrestricted = Utilizes all of the alleles at each locus, and cannot be performed at a locus that contains a stochastic allele. Restricted = Can separate out the alleles above the stochastic threshold as separate from the ones below and perform CPE/CPI on that locus. DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 15

LR (Likelihood Ratio) Ratio of probabilities Both probabilities are conditional, meaning that they are based on a hypothesis Expressed as: LR = Pr(E/S) or the H p Pr (E/U) or the H d Numerator = Probability of the evidence if the sample originated from the suspect (or suspect and unknown contributor) Denominator = Probability of the evidence if the sample originated from one or more unknown individuals DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 16

Calculating Likelihood Ratio: Uses the general formulae for each possible genotype Heterozygote Genotype = 2pq Homozygote Genotype = p 2 + p(1-p)θ Must assume the number of contributors to the mixture Loci used in calculations should display no indication of allelic dropout Assumes that any unknown contributors are not related. DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 17

General Report Wording for Likelihood Ratios: The probability of the evidence is x times more likely if the stain came from suspect than if it came from an unknown, unrelated individual. Keep in mind that it is NOT appropriate to state that The probability that the stain came from suspect is x times greater than it coming from an unknown individual DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 18

Report Wording Considerations: Using source or source attribution statements Cannot be excluded v. Included Make sure to include any assumptions being made in the wording Exclusion conclusions do not require statistical analysis DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 19

Practical Examples from Palm Beach County Sheriff s Office The following are examples only of possible wording for reporting statistics DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 20

Example #1: Major/Minor (no stochastic alleles) Mixed Blood B Standard A Standard B D3S1358 (16), 17 17 16, 17 TH01 6, 7, 9.3 6, 7 9.3 D21S11 28, 30, 31.2, 32.2 30, 32.2 28, 31.2 D18S51 13, 14, 15, 17 13, 14 15, 17 Penta_E (5), 12 12 5, 12 D5S818 9, 12 9, 12 9, 12 D13S317 11, 13 11, 13 11, 13 D7S820 8, (9), 10 8, 9 8, 10 D16S539 11, 12, 13 11,13 12 CSF1PO (10), (11), 12 12 10, 11 Penta_D 9, 11, 12, 15 9, 12 11, 15 AMEL X, (Y) X X, Y vwa 14, 16, 18 16 14, 18 D8S1179 11, (13), 16 11, 13 11, 16 TPOX 8, (9) 8 8, 9 FGA 19, 20, 22 20, 22 19, 22 Generate CMF * CPE, RMP, or LR for all loci DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 21

Example #1 (Report Wording) 1) A DNA profile was obtained from the blood stain and indicates the presence of two individuals. A. Victim is the source of the major DNA profile. B. Suspect cannot be excluded as a contributor to this DNA mixture. The estimates of the combined probability of inclusion (i.e. the chance of selecting an unrelated individual at random that would be expected to be included) for the observed DNA mixture profile is approximately: Caucasian: 1 in XXXX African American: 1 in XXXX Hispanic: 1 in XXXX NOTE: Source attribution statements at P.B.S.O indicates a RMP of less than 1 in 300 Billion for all three population groups. DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 22

Example #2: Major/Minor (stochastic effects) D3S1358 14, (16), (17) 14 16, 17 TH01 6, (8), (9) 6, 8 6, 9 D21S11 28, (29), 30 28, 30 29, 30 D18S51 (12), 14, 15 14, 15 12, 20 Penta_E 7, (10), (12), 19 7, 19 10, 12 D5S818 11, 12, (13) 11, 12 13 D13S317 8, (10), 12 8, 12 8, 10 D7S820 9, (11) 9 9, 11 D16S539 (8), (9), 11 11 8, 9 CSF1PO (9), 10, 12 10, 12 9, 10 Penta_D (10), 12, (13), 14 12, 14 10, 13 AMEL X, Y X, Y X vwa (14), 16, 17, (19) 16, 17 14, 19 D8S1179 13, (14), 15, (16) 13, 15 14, 16 TPOX 8, (9), 10 8, 10 8, 9 FGA (21), 22, 23 22, 23 19, 21 outside suspect s shorts suspect victim Suspect = Major DNA profile = RMP Victim = Minor DNA profile, CPE or LR at 4 loci (no stochastic alleles) or could calculate a restricted RMP assuming a 2 person mixture DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 23

Example #2 (Report Wording): 1) A DNA profile was obtained from the outside of the suspect s shorts and indicates the presence of two individuals. A. Suspect is the source of the major DNA profile. B. Victim cannot be excluded as a contributor to this DNA mixture. The estimates of the combined probability of inclusion (i.e. the chance of selecting an unrelated individual at random that would be expected to be included) for the observed DNA mixture profile is approximately: Caucasian: 1 in XXXX African American: 1 in XXXX Hispanic: 1 in XXXX NOTE: Source attribution statements at P.B.S.O indicates a RMP of less than 1 in 300 Billion for all three population groups. DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 24

Example #3: Mixture with NO Major/Minor D3S1358 14, 16, 17 14 16, 17 TH01 6, 8, 9 6, 8 6, 9 D21S11 (28), 29, 30 28, 30 29, 30 D18S51 12, (14), (15), (20) 14, 15 12, 20 Penta_E 7, 10, 12, (19) 7, 19 10, 12 D5S818 (11), (12), 13 11, 12 13 D13S317 8, 10, (12) 8, 12 8, 10 D7S820 9, 11 9 9, 11 D16S539 8, 9, 11 11 8, 9 CSF1PO 9, 10, (11), (12) 10, 12 9, 10 Penta_D 10, (12), (13), 14 12, 14 10, 13 AMEL X, (Y) X, Y X vwa 14, (16), (17), 19 16, 17 14, 19 D8S1179 13, 14, 15, 16 13, 15 14, 16 TPOX 8, 9, (10) 8, 10 8, 9 FGA 19, 21, (22), 23 22, 23 19, 21 inside susp underwear suspect victim CPE or LR calculation for all loci w/no stochastic alleles (12 loci) OR Could calculate RMP for all the loci DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 25

Example #3 (Report Wording): 1) A DNA profile was obtained from the inside of the suspect s underwear and indicates the presence of two individuals. Suspect and Victim cannot be excluded as contributors to this DNA mixture. The estimates of the combined probability of inclusion (i.e. the chance of selecting an unrelated individual at random that would be expected to be included) for the observed DNA mixture profile is approximately: Caucasian: 1 in XXXX African American: 1 in XXXX Hispanic: 1 in XXXX DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 26

Example #4: Complex Mixtures Swabs of trigger of gun Suspect D3S1358 (14), 15, 16, 17 15, 16 TH01 6, 7, (8), (9) 6, 8 D21S11 28, 30, (36) 31, 36 D18S51 (14), (15), 15.2, (16), 17, (18), (19) 16, 17 Penta_E 5, (12) 7, 11 D5S818 (9), 11, (12), 13 12 D13S317 9, (11), 12 12 D7S820 7, (8), (9), 10, (11), (12) 11 D16S539 9, (10), 11, (12) 11 CSF1PO (7), (8), 10, 11, (12) 10 Penta_D 2.2, 10, 11, 13 12, 13 AMEL X, (Y) X, Y vwa 15, 16 15, 18 D8S1179 (9), (12), (13), 14, 15 14, 15 TPOX (6), 8, 9 8, 11 FGA 17, (19), 23 21, 23 DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 27

Example #4: (Report Wording) 1) A DNA profile was obtained from the swabs from the trigger of the gun at 16 genetic markers. This DNA profile is a complex mixture of at least 4 individuals. None of the standards submitted in this case are included as a possible contributor to this DNA mixture at all 16 genetic markers. As a result, interpretation of this complex DNA mixture with regard to inclusion and exclusion statements will not be reported. DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 28

Questions? DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 29

Contact Information Karin Crenshaw Palm Beach County Sheriff s Office 3228 Gun Club Road West Palm Beach, FL 33406 561-688-4239 crenshawk@pbso.org DNA Mixture Interpretation Reporting DNA Mixture Results and Statistics 30