Retaining Walls. and Going Beyond the Standards

Similar documents
FACING OPTIONS FOR SOIL NAIL WALLS. John G. Delphia, P.E. TxDOT Bridge Division Geotechnical Branch

City of Mesquite General Design Standards Revision Date:

INTERSTATE CORRIDOR PLANNING

September 2007 Thomas Bohuslav Texas Department of Transportation

FREIGHT PLAN UPDATE/CRITICAL FREIGHT CORRIDORS. Association of Texas MPOs 2017 Summer Meeting

REPAIR OF AN 80-YEAR- OLD DRY STACK WALL. Ryan Eaves, E.I.T. Bridge Division Geotechnical Branch

Architectural Applications

Why specify Surface Aggregate Classification A (SAC-A)?

STANDARDIZED CONCRETE BRIDGES IN TEXAS. John Holt, PE, Texas Department of Transportation Ronald Medlock, PE, Texas Department of Transportation

Introduction. Massing and Overall Form. Ridgeview Estates. Ridgeview Estates is a 48 lot, single-family home community by Trammel Crow.

Tilikum Crossing Transit Bridge. Portland, OR

Building Interstate 69 As A Series of Upgrade Projects

ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 5

Recycled Materials Resource Center

VALUE ENGINEERING FOR TxDOT PROJECT MANAGERS

TxDOT Public-Private Partnerships Lessons Learned. OMW: Market, Communication, and Policy Trends in Tolling

USE OF HIGH PERFORMANCE STEEL IN TEXAS BRIDGES

Introduction. Massing and Overall Form. Catalina. Catalina is a 111 lot, single-family home community by Costain Arizona, Inc.

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Historic Bridge Adoption Information Packet. Medina County CR 662 Francisco Perez Creek

Ironton Russell Bridge Project

Introduction. Massing and Overall Form. Andalusia I and II

Historic Bridge Adoption Information Packet

Purdue Road School. Highway Noise Analysis Design Considerations. ODOT Design Experience. Michael F. Johnston, P.E.

Save time. Save money. Specify a fast, economical Vist-A-Wall MSE. fast and easy to install. They adapt well to curves, angles and

Ironton Russell Bridge Project

Article Construction, Section E. Production Operations, Section 2. Mixing and Discharge of Materials Where We Are Now

Telling the Freight (trucking/goods movement) story:

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF DESIGN

BEAUTIFUL PROTECTION MAXIMUM SECURITY SUPERIOR CONCRETE

URBAN HARDSCAPES. Create your dream design.

ALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY

September 14, 2017 TxDOT PAVED Transportation Summit Waco September 14, 2017

2016 PRODUCT BROCHURE

Eagle Ford and Barnett Shale Activities. Impacts to the Transportation System

With Illustrated Guidelines for Implementation

RESIDENTIAL FENCE STANDARDS

Prestressed Member Fabrication Plants (Multi-Project) Material Producer List Construction Division Materials & Pavements Section

1971 HISD REPORTS. Highway Mileage on State, State Toll, County and Municipal Systems by County and by District

MOA Project # Golden View Drive Intersection & Safety Upgrades

FY 2002 RMC 1 PAVEMENTS. Construction

TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS (TSMO)

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Specification Changes and Their Effect on Plans. Bridge Construction Issues. BRG VTC April, 2010

Business and Property Value Impacts of Raised Medians

Precast Panel Walls Wire Walls. Introducing the Grid-Strip TM Soil Reinforcement System. ail.ca. Saves time and money

Pavement Design Support IAC Cost savings from Corridor Studies in the Odessa District

Strengthened Bascule Piers for the Newly Rehabilitated Bridge of Lions

Ironton Russell Bridge Project

Annual CSAH Needs Update for 2018

WELCOME TO THE PILE DRIVING INSPECTOR COURSE

Learning Objectives. A Brief History

WORK AUTHORIZATION ASSIGNMENT PROCESS

Report on. Texas Bridges. as of September Prepared by the Bridge Division Texas Department of Transportation

PROJECT MANAGEMENT. Short Course. October 15, October 15, 2014

New Concrete Surface Finish Policy

Ironton Russell Bridge Project

Ironton Russell Bridge Project

7.0 Stakeholder and Public Outreach

Earth Retention Systems For Transportation Projects

TXDOT ALTERNATIVE DELIVERY SUPPORT TOOL

DIVISION 04 MASONRY CAST STONE. A. Design Considerations. 1. Cast stone shall comply with ASTM C1364, Standard Specification for Cast Stone.

Regional Mobility Authorities in Texas

Earth Retaining System

2016 ACEC/PA ANNUAL MEETING

Accelerated Construction: A Path Forward by Texas Department of Transportation 512/ All Rights Reserved

MINNESOTA ARCHITECTURE - HISTORY INVENTORY FORM

PIER PROTECTION (VEHICLE COLLISION) September 13, 2018

Waterproofing and Types of Drains

Tribute Retaining Wall System Traditional Split Face & Rustic Finish Styles

d 'International Finishing Ltd.,

RETAINING WALL SOLUTIONS

BRICK CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

BUILDING DESIGN STANDARDS

TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR THE REQUEST FOR STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATION FOR RIGHT OF WAY SURVEYING SERVICES INTERNATIONAL BRIDE TRADE CORRIDOR

DURISOL PRECAST NOISE BARRIERS PRODUCT GUIDE

Pavement Design Support IAC Corridor Analysis Studies

TEXAS CONNECTED FREIGHT CORRIDORS

Exhibition sectors at BAU

Texas Water Issues. Key Points. Texas Groundwater Marketing and Exporting. Texas Water Sources/Uses. Ronald A. Kaiser

Construction and Materials Tips

PARTIAL-DEPTH PRECAST DECK PANEL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION IN TEXAS

2018 CAPITAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW PART 1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEBRUARY 12, 2019

3940 West Pine Blvd: Request for Variances

COPING and STOOLS - EXTERIOR CUBIC STONE COPING AND WALLS DATA SHEET 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 DESIGN CRITERIA EXTERIOR CUBIC STONE COPING AND WALLS

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION PLAN DEVELOPMENT

of Contents Table of Figures List List of Tables

Manual of Aesthetic Design Practice

Future Trends. Asphalt Rubber. Gregory S. Cleveland, P.E. TxDOT Construction Division. f HMA. f 1

TxDOT Chip Seal Over Geotextile Fabric. Research Project

Profile: Canyon Ledge

REVIEW OF RURAL TRANSPORTATION AND CONNECTIVITY INITIATIVES

Reinforced California Architectural Roof Pavers, Pedestal Supported

MEMORANDUM. TO: District Engineers DATE: June 30, SUBJECT: New Miscellaneous Bridge Standard Drawings (English)

Texas State Highway 130 Proposed Routes

Design and Construction of the SH58 Ramp A Flyover Bridge over IH70. Gregg A. Reese, PE, CE, Summit Engineering Group, Inc.

Ironton Russell Bridge Project

Providing Engineered Concrete Solutions. Precast and Mission Critical Facilities A Natural Fit

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ROBERT YALDA, P.E., T.E., PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER BRYAN SALGUERO, E.I.T., ASSISTANT ENGINEER

SHRP 2 - R04 Innovative Bridge Designs for Rapid Renewal

Transcription:

Retaining Walls and Going Beyond the Standards

Aesthetic Focus Appropriate roadway structures Level one (basic) designs and example Level two (semi-urban) designs, examples, and processes Level three (major urban) designs Design principles and choices Processes and examples Cost and value Form liner process Contacts

Appropriate Roadway Structures Determine if the project includes appropriate structures for decorative design. MSE walls Cast-in-place walls (drilled shaft, soil nail) Modular block walls (geometry, only) Bridge columns

Levels of Aesthetic Design Determine which level is appropriate for the project: Level 1 Basic projects, rural areas Level 2 Projects in semi-urban areas, moderate traffic Level 3 Projects in major urban areas, high traffic

Level 1 Design Standard design for most projects Used in low traffic areas Requires minimal expenditures on decorative treatments

Level 1 Example Standard bridge I beam structure

Level 2 Design Standard design with simple decorative finishes and minimal use of color Good for semi-urban areas Options include: Colored/textured concrete surfaces for retaining walls, colored textured concrete surfaces and stains for rip-rap Modular block retaining walls Form liners on bridge columns and retaining walls Concrete brick pavers

Level 2 Example: US 83 1987: First Level 2 Design in Pharr District

Level 2 Process Standard Seal and Map Detail

Level 2 Process Map on MSE Panel

Level 2 Process Seal on MSE Panel

Level 2 Process Ashlar Stone Texture on MSE Panel

Level 2 Process Ashlar Stone Texture on MSE Detail

Level 2 Process Form Liners

Level 2 Process Attached Column Detail Sheet

Level 2 Process Form Liner Flat Work

Level 2 Process Attached Column Form for Form Liner Cap Detail

Level 2 Process Attached Column Segment Form for Form Liner

Level 2 Process Column Segments Stacked after Fabrication

Level 2 Process Column in Construction, with Ashlar Stone Panels

Level 2 Process Attached Column Cap Detail

Level 2 Process Column Cap Detail & form liners (IH 35 Austin)

Level 3 Design Standard design packet with decorative finishes PLUS high profile designs. Murals, extensive form liner and color applications to most concrete surfaces. Major urban and high traffic areas, only. Principles: stylization, depth, color, scale. Rules for success: community ties (contextsensitive design), economy, focus.

Design Principles Stylization Line Outline Inline Positive Negative Multi-level Stylized Sculpture Realistic Sculpture

Design Principles Stylization: Multi-Level Form (US 181, Portland)

Design Principles Stylization: Multi-Level Form (IH 20, Odessa District)

Design Principles Stylization: Sculptured Application

Design Principles Depth

Design Principles Color: US 281 in Hidalgo County

Design Principles Color: SH 100 & US 77/83

Design Principles Color: SH 1015/SH 1016 in Pharr District

Design Principles Scale: US 281 in Edinburg, Texas

Design Principles Scale: Combinations with Typical Form Liners

Design Principles Scale: Waco District Sign Bridge column

Design Principles Scale: SH 100 & US 77/83

Rules for Success Context-Sensitive Design

Rules for Success Context: Nature SH 358/SH 286, Corpus Christi

Rules for Success Context: History US 77/83, Brownsville

Rules for Success Context: History US 77/83, Brownsville

Rules for Success Economy: Repetition

Rules for Success Economy: Repetition SH 358/SH 286,Corpus Christi

Rules for Success Economy: Repetition US 77/83, Brownsville

Rules for Success Form Liner Detail Sheet for US 77/83

Rules for Success Economy (Repetition) and Focus w/column as a Focal Point

Form Liner Process Column Form Liner Detail

Form Liner Process Column Form Liner Detail Sheet

Form Liner Process Typical Section for Form Liner

Form Liner Process Form Liner Fabrication

Form Liner Process Column Form Liner

Form Liner Process Form Liners and MSE 3-D Art

Form Liner Process Sample Detail of Art Work in PS&E

Form Liner Process Typical Section and 3-D Control

Form Liner Process Form Liners for MSE Panels

Cost and Value Cost over normal treatments in percentages: Form liners for MSE, cast in place etc. = 1% 5% of total cost. Form liners for column treatments = 1% 5% of total cost. Value: Not quantified. Additional pleasure for traveling public and additional sense of geographic, cultural, and community.

Closing comments Due to the advancements in construction techniques, TxDOT is able to offer more to the public than the standard construction elements by the addition of decorative finishes. This allows TxDOT, local public agencies and the private sector to become more associated with roadway development. Also provides an opportunity of additional cost of the use of aesthetic treatments to be shared with outside interests and improve the quality of life in our communities.

For More Info Bridge Division, Design Section Dean W. Vanlanduyt, P.E. 512-416-2178 Design Division, Landscape Section Barrie Cogburn, 512-416-3086 District Landscape Architects http://crossroads/org/des/le/index.asp