Transactions on the Built Environment vol 33, 1998 WIT Press, ISSN

Similar documents
Simulation of transport system

SUTRA : Sustainable Urban Transportation for the City of Tomorrow

11 th Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor Forum Meeting

THE CONTINUING ROLE OF THE STRATHCLYDE TRANSPORTATION AND LAND-USE MODEL IN STRATEGIC PLANNING. Paul Emmerson and Dr Andrew Ash TRL

ITF Transport Outlook 2015

Some network flow problems in urban road networks. Michael Zhang Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California Davis

Introduction. The Traditional Approach

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 54 ( 2012 ) 5 11 EWGT Proceedings of the 15th meeting of the EURO Working Group on Transportation

CHAPTER 9 TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL SUMMARY

Urban mobility and Good Distribution Practice. Milena Janjevic, Qalinca Labs Université libre de Bruxelles

Systems : An Analysis. TG Crainic, J Damay, M Gendreau, R Namboothiri June 15, 2009

Appendix B5 PT Model Validation

VISUM State-of-the-Art Travel Demand Modeling VISUM

AMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA

6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS

Travel Demand Modelling [T1]

Transportation Model Report

Passenger Transport Modelling [T1]

Development of a New Strategic Transport Planning Model for Adelaide

Abstract. 1 Introduction

Urban Transportation Planning Prof Dr. V. Thamizh Arasan Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute Of Technology, Madras

Zenith Model Framework Papers Version Paper I Zenith Transit Assignment Algorithm

Project Appraisal Using PRISM Simon Hubbard 28 th September 2004

Prospect of Technology for Public Transit Planning using Smart Card Data

Effectively Using the QRFM to Model Truck Trips in Medium-Sized Urban Communities

CHAPTER 8 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT

Transport Model for Scotland. Kevin Lumsden MVA

SECTOR ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY): URBAN TRANSPORT 1

Luis Martinez International Transport Forum

Dynamic Trip Assignment-Simulation Model for Intermodal Transportation Networks

1 Introduction. 2 Mobility in Palermo. 164 Urban Transport XIX

Project Evaluation Criteria

9. TRAVEL FORECAST MODEL DEVELOPMENT

Appendix B2: Factors Affecting Transit Choice

Travel Forecasting Tutorial

Applying Spatial Aggregation Methods to Identify Opportunities for New Bus Services in London

APPENDIX B - GLOSSARY FEBRUARY 2017

Infrastructure and Growth Leadership Advisory Group Ideas and Approaches Survey

National Transport Model. Variable Demand Model Report

LATTS II - Freight Investment Decision Principles

Travel Demand Modeling At NCTCOG

Urban transport system benchmarking

Cluster 2/Module 2 (C2/M2): Introduction to Network Design.

Tours-Based LUTI Modelling

MICRO-SIMULATION OF A NIGHT TAXI-BUS SERVICE FOR THE HISTORICAL CENTRE OF ROME

IMPACT OF TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT ON SUGAR TRANSPORTATION MODAL SHIFT IN NORTHEASTERN THAILAND

Chapter 8 Travel Demand Forecasting & Modeling

Introduction to Transportation Systems

Introduction to Transportation Systems Analysis

Estimating traffic flows and environmental effects of urban commercial supply in global city logistics decision support

November 16, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board. Review of FTA Summit Software

Summary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans

Applications of Microscopic Traffic Simulation Model for Integrated Networks

1 DRAFT Model Capability

Interactive Statewide Transportation Planning Modeling Process

DEVELOPMENT OF RIGA-MINSK TRANSPORT CORRIDOR SIMULATION MODEL

Network Operation Planning - A new approach to managing congestion

UGM modelling in France

Travel Demand Forecasting User Guide

Improving the Analysis of a Toll Ring Scheme Implementation by a Travel Demand Management Model

Database and Travel Demand Model

A Decision Support System for the Design of Urban Inter-modal Public Transit Network

DEVELOPMENT OF LIEPAJA CITY MACROSCOPIC MODEL FOR DECISION-MAKING

Multi-Resolution Traffic Modeling for Transform 66 Inside the Beltway Projects. Prepared by George Lu, Shankar Natarajan

IHT SPRING CONFERENCE MARCH 2008

CITYMOBIL ADVANCED ROAD TRANSPORT FOR THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT

CITYFREIGHT ITALIAN CASE STUDY COPENHAGEN MAY 2003

An Integrated Transport - Economics Model for Ontario

THE N1 CORRIDOR CAPE TOWN: AN INTEGRATED MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT STRATEGY FOR THE CORRIDOR

Evaluation of travel demand management policies in the urban area of Naples

APPENDIX D. Glossary D-1

Planning and Analysis Tools of Transportation Demand and Investment Development of Formal Transportation Planning Process

QUT Digital Repository:

Application of system dynamics with GIS for assessing traffic emission management policy

2. Goals and Objectives

Country Report on Sustainable Urban Transport

UK Road Pricing Feasibility Study: Modelling the Impacts Elizabeth Cox 1 UK

1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

EVALUATION METHODOLOGY OF THE IMPACTS OF BUS RAPID TRANSIT CORRIDORS (BRT) IN LIVORNO NETWORK

Introduction to Transportation Systems

Freight Transportation Planning and Modeling Spring 2012

Urban Traffic Management Approaches to Achieve Sustainability

TAG UNIT M3.1. Highway Assignment Modelling. January Department for Transport. Transport Analysis Guidance (TAG)

AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE EVALUATION GUIDANCE

PIA - Core Skills in Planning Lecture Series 2015

Network Evaluation Model NEMO

Development of a Decision Support Model Using MapObjects to Study Transportation Systems

Origin-Destination Trips and Skims Matrices

Energy Savings by replacing old facility o Energy savings o Emissions

TUBA: General Guidance and Advice

Air Pollution Zoning based on Land use and Traffic of Vehicles

Content of the module

Drivers of Congestion Growth & Change

AN INTEGRATED TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND OPERATIONS MODEL FOR MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE

Supply and Demand Analysis

Validate: A New Method To Generate Nationwide Traffic Data

Highway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan. TAB September 20, 2017

The Victorian Transport Plan (Department of Transport, 2008).

National Transport Model

Chapter #9 TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL

Transcription:

Simulation of the environmental efficiency of the Rome Intermodal UDS designed for the next Jubilee F. Marangon, G. Righetti D 'Appolonia S. p. A, via S. Nazaro, 16145 Genoa, Italy Email: dappolonia@pn.itnet.it Abstract For the demand-intensive occasion of the Jubilee of the year 2000, a new Urban Transport System (UTS) has been designed for Rome, based on several modal interchange nodes (car-train, bus-train) radially located along city belt, and on a selective pricing policy for the downtown penetration by private car. The objective is to improve the mobility-environmental efficiency in the central areas. Several possible configurations for the new intermodal UTS have been evaluated by use of case-specific models, innovative simulation methodologies and related sw tools. These models allow in particular an explicit characterisation of the inter-multi-modal network and are based on comprehensive cost-functions, encompassing perceived costs as a function of traveller category, pricing, and other cost factors. The paper focalizes on the simulation environment developed and used in order to characterise the aforementioned parameters. In particular, the MTCP system (Macroscale Transport Chain Planning) and the MIAURB system (Macroscale Integrated Analysis of Urban mobility-environmental Balance) are described. These systems have been both applied to the intermodal network model to evaluate, in sequence: a) the modal split due to the intermodal supply, b) the detailed transport times of the network links; c) the multimodal traffic volumes; d) the environmental "zonal" efficiency parameters, in terms of: space occupancy, time-space usage, pollutant emissions, social cost of mobility, etc. A discussion on the results obtained and performance of the simulation method is finally presented.

54 Urban Transport and the Environment for the 21st Century Introduction It is probably superfluous to discuss here the many problems related to the current situation of degraded urban mobility; it is evident however that the evolution of this situation, without any efficient countermeasures, is producing a rapid and severe degeneration of the socialeconomic assets and liveability in larger towns. The following are distressing examples: congestion of transport networks, criticality of air pollution and traffic noise; the economic cost of transport (15% of family budget) that is beyond any acceptable limit; in addition, the indirect costs (environment, energy, etc.) suffered by the community are even more higher than the direct costs. Recent studies of important European cities reveal that the most efficient way to solve urban mobility problems is the balanced implementation of four actions: i) improvement of public transport, ii) development of intermodal infrastructure and other integrated facilities, iii) development of area pricing and road pricing policies, iv) organisation in the distribution of the services within an urban planning. Experience indicates that a good strategy is to implement targeted interventions to partially solve problems in the short term, provided that they are carried out within a global integrated planning scenario. 1 Methodological Approach The correct approach to solve this problem is to take into consideration the so-called "mobility-environment balance". Mobility in congested towns strictly interacts with the environment and the sociality. The basic objective is to get UTS configurations where users' internal costs and benefits are "externalised" in order to control the modal split, reduce the impacts, and maximise the mobility efficiency of the whole society. The design methodology requires a comprehensive planning activity of alternative scenarios, including intermodality and pricing; this can be accomplished by the combined use of two different kinds of simulation tools: the MTCP (Macroscale Transport Chain Planner, D'Appolonia [1]) and MIAURB (Macro Integrated URban Balance, D'Appolonia [2]) software systems. The first allows to analyse the UTS with particular attention to the interaction of different transport modes and to the influences that the most important influencing factors (time, cost of travel, comfort, etc.)

Urban Transport and the Environment for the 21st Century 55 have on modal choices. The second allows to investigate in detail the public and private road traffic, which is the major cause of pollution. This analysis is performed using as input the MTCP outputs, including the configuration of the road network, which depends on the MTCP defined interchange nodes, and the reference modal OD matrices. As an example, if there is a travel with use of car and subway, thefirstpart of this displacement will be considered in the private car OD matrix, while the second in subway OD matrix, and the MIAURB road network is accordingly defined. i Multi Modal i ; -»' Network i ^' Area and Interchange ' Parameters ' Maklx Road Pricing Nodes MTCP NO CONVERGENCE YES Road i i Modal OD I Road Network Network, i Matrices! Characterstic MIAURB i ^ MIAURB! Road Network i I Parameters i y \! Environmental * Fleet L. J Urban I Data Composition Balance I Figure 1: Methodological Approach and Calibration The calibration of the model is achieved with an iterative use of the aforementioned code (Figure 1). The UTS configurations are implemented within MTCP, where modal displacement time are independent to each other. MIAURB allows to define dependencies between traffic

56 Urban Transport and the Environment for the 21st Century volumes and velocities of road vehicles, and can be used to modify the initial inputs to MTCP. This procedures should be repeated until convergence be achieved, in the modal split, between two MTCP runs. More detail about the two tools are provided. 1.1 MTCP (Macroscale Transport Chain Planner) A simulation system encompassing multi-modal and multi-users assignment, is provided by MTCP - Macroscale Transport Chain Plannerwhich has been employed in the "Porte di Roma" project. This product was developed on the methodological basis of previous models (Stan [3]), with specific enhancements to solve two typical problems: passenger intermodality in urban areas and freight transport planning at regional macro-scale (Righetti [4]). The MTCP system requires 3 input data sets: 1) a multi-layered graph; each layer is composed of mono-modal and mono-directional "transfer" links; the layers can be connected at selected points by "modal interchange" links; 2) total OD matrix for each user type; 3) system data, including the definition of the transport modes and the user types, cost function parameters, bonus/malus, etc. As in a typical aggregated assignment model (De Ortuzar [5]), the simulation procedure implemented in MTCP consists in searching all constraint-consistent and transport-efficient routes linking each OD pair, and, subsequently, subdividing the OD total flow over these routes. Traffic distribution to each route is inversely proportional to the generalised route cost. In this way, MTCP evaluates the traffic volume, for each mode and user type, both in the "transfer" and the modal "interchange" links. The MTCP system provides a correct representation of the basic elements discussed above. In particular: relationships between supply and different users kinds are definable at link level; route flows are stochastically evaluated (Logit type functions) through a computationally efficient single-step procedure; specific situations can be simulated (as a variation of generalised cost) by defining conditions for bonus/malus factors applied to links; tariff terms in the cost function can be defined as generic functions of total travel length, for each type of users and mode, consistently with the urban transport pricing policies (road and area pricing); approximations inherent to macro-description of the network can be

Urban Transport and the Environment for the 21st Century 57 reduced by the definition of a mean accessibility cost for each centroidal zone. 1.2 MIAURB (Macro Integrated Analysis of URban Balance) The MIAURB system is made by a score of processing-analysissimulation modules which pick up data, for their computation, from a wide database and/or MTCP system. The data refers to the network physical characteristics, to monitoring campaigns of traffic volumes, air pollutants and noise levels. A brief description of the four basic modules is hereby provided. DAPTRANS provides simulation of urban traffic. Its basic functions are: deterministic and probabilistic evaluation of multimodal traffic parameters given a project demand (public/private origin-destination O-D matrices) and a public/private supply (road network): evaluation of main and alternative routes for each O-D pair (travel); evaluation of efficiency parameters related to mobility and spatial occupancy In particular DAPTRANS can evaluate at micro-scale and locate the vehicle queues. For each link it is computed the maximum number of equivalent vehicles waiting in queue as a function of the real dimensions of the link. This parameter allows to determine an "effective" capacity of the link intersection; on these bases traffic volumes exceeding this value are assigned to the originator links, by a back-propagation alghoritm. The effect of this methodology is a better representation of congested situations. DAPTRANS is able to consider other specific characteristics, such as: collective means of transport running on reserved lanes and managed by dedicated signalling, traffic limited zones, road tolls and area pricing, and results updating by traffic counts information (OD reconstruction is also allowed by use of the DAPROD module). DAPATMOS module provides a global/local (canyon effect) evaluation of air pollution by traffic emission. Its basic functions are: evaluation of pollutants emissions (CO, NOx,, SOx, Pb, VOC, Particulate, etc.) and of energy consumption due to different vehicle types and traffic characteristics (as simulated by DAPTRANS). Such analysis is based on available emission factor data (EMEP/CORINAIR [6]); evaluation of diffusion of pollutants at global level as a function of meteorological conditions, based on the DIMULA model (ENEA

58 Urban Transport and the Environment for the 21st Century [7]); evaluation of local concentration of pollutants on the basis of geometric characteristics of roads (canyon effect) and local meteorological conditions (USEPA [8]). In particular the code is able the evaluate in detail the pollutants emission due to vehicles waiting in queue, which are the major cause of impact in urban congested areas. DAPNOISE provides an evaluation of noise emissions due to traffic. Equivalent sound levels are computed on the road axis and then propagated on the basis of attenuation laws (CETUR [9], Cannelli [10]) which consider calibration curves obtained by specific data measured for the urban configuration under consideration. DAPCOMP computes efficiency parameters (Ott [11]) at macro level i.e. for selected zones of the city or for the entire UTS, and compare these values with the limit capacities pre-defined (on urban planning bases) for each zone. Figure 2: Rail And Underground Network and "Porte di Roma" for Year 2000

Urban Transport and the Environment for the 21st Century 59 2 Rome Model The described methodology has been used to analyse the Rome UTS of the Jubilee and the year 2000+, to assess the efficiency of possible mobility configurations. The Rome model includes a multi-modal 4-layered network (railroad, subway, public and private road transport system) represented in Figure 2, a multi-user demand (students, clerk's and workers, freelances and managers, tourist's), and road and area pricing schemes. 2.1 Multi-Modal Network Public Transport System The public transport system has been modelled with three different network layers (railroad, subway, and bus). These are characterised by the following parameters, specific for each mode and for each service: commercial speed, headway, accessibility (mean time spent by an user to reach the station or the bus stop), and interchange time and cost (mean time and cost spent by an user to take another line or transport system). Private Transport System Each link of the road network, is characterised by a commercial speed and capacity. Other parameters are related to road pricing (highway toll system) and to area pricing (mean cost to park, this value is defined for each transport zone). Intermodal Link (Private-Public) The Rome model is completed with the location of interchange nodes: car parkings that allows to access to the public transport system (railroad and subway). This links are characterised with a limit capacity, an accessibility (mean time spent to park the car and reach the station), and direct cost for parking. 2.2 Multi-Users Demand The transport demand has been modelled with four OD matrix: students, clerk's and workers, freelances and managers, tourist's. This are characterised by a different time value and inclination to the use of a given transport mode. The first parameter is directly defined as a program input, the second is represented by bonus/malus coefficients. 2.3 Simulations Results Modal Split and Mobility In Table 1 are reported the results of four different scenarios: 1995 (base

60 Urban Transport and the Environment for the 21st Century scenario), 2000_int (year 2000 with interchange nodes and area pricing), 2000_nint (year 2000 without interchange nodes, but with area pricing) and 2010 (year 2010 with both interchange nodes and area pricing). The number of private car users decreases notably and consequently the mean travel speed increases. This is due principally to the area pricing toll system (there is a no significant difference between the scenarios 2000_int and 2000_int). The greater use of public transportation mean involves a decrease of "out of pocket" costs. Modal Split Total Users Private Car "pc" Railroad "r" Subway "s" Bus "b" Private-Public Public-Public Passengers x km "pc" [10*] Passengers x km "r" [10*] Passengers x km "s" [10*] Passengers x km "b"[ 10*] Mean speed [km/h] Out Of Pocket Costs [ /km] 1995 591000 312000 56000 99000 124000 - - 2.9 0.7 0.5 1.3 10.6 385 2000_int 641000 125000 140000 137000 105000 55000 79000 1.4 2.1 1.2 1.1 12.0 353 Table 1: Analyses Results 2000_nint 641000 147000 96000 167000 130000-101000 1.3 1.8 1.2 1.5 11.5 341 2010 678000 119000 171000 177000 106000 45000 60000 1.2 2.4 1.8 1.0 12.8 295 Environment The effects of the mobility policy has been evaluated dividing the urban context in three concentric zones (Figure 3). The reduction of pollutant emissions increase progressively toward downtown (where the parking toll is higher): in first zone the reduction is about 60%, in the second 80% and in the third (historical centre) up to 90% with respect to the present highly critical situation of Rome centre.. Costs Benefits Analyses The methodology adopted allowed to get the parameters required to develop a costs benefits analyses. In particular it has been possible to choose, among various possibilities, the best location of interchange nodes and their layouts, and to define an efficient implementation sequence.

Urban Transport and the Environment for the 21st Century 61 Figure 3: Environmental Impact Analysis - CO Emissions References [1] D'Appolonia S.p.A., MTCP - Macroscale Transport Chain Planner, User's Manual, D'Appolonia Report, Genoa, 1995. [2] D'Appolonia S.p.A., MIAURB - Macro Integrated Analysis of Urban Balance, User's Manual, D'Appolonia Report, Genoa, 1997. [3] Stan, Guelat J., Florian M., and Carinic T.G., A multimode Multi- ;?AW%cf AfefworA; /Wg/zme/zf AWe/ /or Arafegzc Freight Flows, Transportation Science, Vol 24, n.l, 1990. [4] Rlghetti G. and G. Bon, Multimodal Modelling of Tirreno-Brenner Freight Transport Corridor, Proceedings, PTRC - The 24*

62 Urban Transport and the Environment for the 21st Century European Transport Forum, Brunei University, Uxbridge, London, 1996. [5] De Ortuzar J. and Willumsen, Modelling Transport, Wiley, New York, 1990. [6] EMEP/CORINAIR, Atmoshperic Emission Inventory Guidebook - Road Transport, 1995. [7] ENEA, DIMULA 2.1, User's Manual, Rome, 1992. [8] Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), APRAC3/MOBILE1 Emission and Diffusion Modeling Package, User's Manual, Menlo Park, 1986. [9] Canelli, G. B., K. Gluck and S. Santoboni, A Mathematical Model for Evaluation and Prediction of Mean Energy Level of Traffic Noise in Italia Towns, Acustica, Vol. 53, 1983. [10] Centre d'etudes des Transport Urbains (CETUR), Ministere de renvironment et du Cadre de Vie, Guide du Bruit Transport terrestres Prevision des Niveaux Sonore, Bagneux, France, 1980. [11] Ott, W. R., Environmental Indices - Theory and Practice, Ann Arbor Science Publishers Inc., Michigan, 1978.