High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors Now More Than Ever!

Similar documents
AREVA HTR Concept for Near-Term Deployment

Summary Decision Paper. Reference Modular HTGR Reactor Design Concept and. Plant Configuration for Initial Applications

Modular Helium Reactor (MHR) for Oil Sands Extraction

ANTARES Application for Cogeneration. Oil Recovery from Bitumen and Upgrading

Safety Aspects of SMRs: A PRA Perspective

Fast and High Temperature Reactors for Improved Thermal Efficiency and Radioactive Waste Management

Small Modular Nuclear Reactor (SMR) Research and Development (R&D) and Deployment in China

The Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP)

Overview and Status of SMRs Being Developed in the United States

Preliminary Lessons Learned from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident for Advanced Nuclear Power Plant Technology Development

High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor Projected Markets and Preliminary Economics

Concept and technology status of HTR for industrial nuclear cogeneration

Very High Temperature Reactor

VHTR System Prof. Dr. LI Fu

Specific Design Consideration of ACP100 for Application in the Middle East and North Africa Region

Nuclear Cogeneration

NuScale: Expanding the Possibilities for Nuclear Energy

ADVANCED REACTOR TECHNOLOGY. Everett Redmond, Ph.D. Nuclear Energy Institute. January 9, 2018

Reactor Technology and Cogeneration for a Cleaner Environment

Development of the Next Generation of Nuclear Energy Plants

Small Modular Reactor Materials R&D Program Materials Coordination Webinar

Power Generation. Ronaldo Jenkins Electrical Engineering Branch Chief Office of New Reactors (NRO)

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop on Nuclear Reaction Data for Advanced Reactor Technologies May 2008

Naturally Safe HTGR in the response to the Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident

HTR-PM of 2014: toward success of the world first Modular High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactor demonstration plant

Thermal Response of a High Temperature Reactor during Passive Cooldown under Pressurized and Depressurized Conditions

HTR-PM Project Status and Test Program

GT-MHR OVERVIEW. Presented to IEEE Subcommittee on Qualification

Safety Design of HTGR by JAEA in the light of the Fukushima Daiichi accident

Technologies of HTR-PM Plant and its economic potential

Development of a DesignStage PRA for the Xe-100

Technology Development, Design and Safety Features of the CNP300 and A New Small PWR

Technology and Prospect of Process Heat Application of HTR(High temperature gas cooled reactor) Applications in Oil Refining Industry

THE FUKUSHIMA ACCIDENT: IMPLICATIONS FOR NUCLEAR SAFETY. Edwin Lyman Union of Concerned Scientists May 26, 2011

The Gen IV Modular Helium Reactor

Regulatory Review Aspects of Post-Fukushima Safety Enhancements in Indian NPPs

Scenarios of Heavy Beyond-Design-Basis Accidents in HTGRs N.G. Kodochigov, Yu.P. Sukharev

Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response. April 15, 2011

Oregon State University s Small Modular Nuclear Reactor Experimental Program

DOE Small Modular Reactor Licensing Technical Support Program Overview for National Conference of State Legislatures June 19, 2014

CO2-free Hydrogen production: the Nuclear route

DESIGN, SAFETY FEATURES & PROGRESS OF HTR-PM. Yujie DONG INET, Tsinghua University, China January 24, 2018

Pre-Conceptual Hydrogen Production Modular Helium Reactor Designs. IAEA International Conference on Non-Electric Applications of Nuclear Energy

Assessment of High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor (HTGR) Capital and Operating Costs

Current Activities on the 4S Reactor Deployment

The Chairman s Forum. Paul H. Genoa Sr. Director, Policy Nuclear Energy Institute

Considerations on the performance and reliability of passive safety systems for nuclear reactors

REQUIREMENTS OF SMR TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT & DEPLOYMENT IN THE UK

Safety enhancement of NPPs in China after Fukushima Accident

AP1000 European 16. Technical Specifications Design Control Document

Westinghouse Small Modular Reactor Development Overview

Generation IV Gas-cooled Reactor System Concepts

ACR Safety Systems Safety Support Systems Safety Assessment

Non-Electric Applications of Nuclear Energy

NuScale SMR Technology

The Westinghouse Advanced Passive Pressurized Water Reactor, AP1000 TM. Roger Schène Director,Engineering Services

Improvements Needed in Nuclear Power Plant Probabilistic Risk Assessments: Lessons Learned from Fukushima

The Next Generation Nuclear Plant Project. The Case for Utility Interest

AP1000 The PWR Revisited

Advanced Reactor Technology

SMART Standard Design Approval inspection result July. 4 th

NRC s Advanced Reactor Program. Edward Baker Advanced Reactor Program Office of New Reactors

Safety design approach for JSFR toward the realization of GEN-IV SFR

SMR An Unconditionally Safe Source of Pollution-Free Nuclear Energy for the Post-Fukushima Age

Safety Implication for Gen-IV SFR based on the Lesson Learned from the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPPs Accident. Ryodai NAKAI Japan Atomic Energy Agency

Current Status and Future Challenges of Innovative Reactors Development in Japan

Small Modular Reactors

Status of Development, ANS Standard 53.1, Nuclear Safety Criteria for the Design of Modular Helium Cooled Reactor Plants

Small Reactors R&D in China. ZHENG Mingguang Ph D Presented on the meeting of TWG-LWR June 18 th -20 th 2013 IAEA, Vienna

Passive Autocatalytic Recombiner. Hydrogen Control and Mitigation for Combustible Gas Control

Recent Developments in Risk Assessment: Future Perspectives

AP1000 European 19. Probabilistic Risk Assessment Design Control Document

High Temperature Reactors in the Nuclear Energy System from position of the Hydrogen Economy

Isolation Condenser; water evaporation in the tank and steam into the air. Atmosphere (in Severe Accident Management, both P/S and M/S)

International Atomic Energy Agency 16 th Meeting of the Technical Working Group on Advanced Technologies for LWRs (UK LWR Activities)

Westinghouse-UK Partnership for Development of a Small Modular Reactor Nuclear Programme

Small Nuclear Steam Generators for Alberta's Bitumen Resources

Japan Revival Strategy by Thorium MSR

NUCLEAR POWER NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN 2012

Design Features, Economics and Licensing of the 4S Reactor

Regulation of Waste Streams from Small Modular Reactors and Advanced Reactors

Perspectives from Using PRA in Designing Advanced Reactors: An Iterative Approach to Uses of Risk Information in NuScale Design

ANTARES The AREVA HTR-VHTR Design PL A N TS

Safety Design Requirements and design concepts for SFR

Status of PBMR Process Heat Plant Project

Korean Perspective on Nuclear Energy after Fukushima Accident

THE PATH TOWARDS A GERMANE SAFETY AND LICENSING APPROACH FOR MODULAR HIGH TEMPERATURE GAS-COOLED REACTORS ABSTRACT

EM 2 : Nuclear Power for the 21 st Century

Compact, Deployable Reactors for Power and Fuel in Remote Regions

An overview of what happened at Fukushima NPPs

Westinghouse Small Modular Reactor. Passive Safety System Response to Postulated Events

Thermal Fluid Characteristics for Pebble Bed HTGRs.

Nuclear Power Plant Safety Basics. Construction Principles and Safety Features on the Nuclear Power Plant Level

Nuclear Power Plant Safety Basics. Construction Principles and Safety Features on the Nuclear Power Plant Level

The Generation IV Gas Cooled Fast Reactor

GENERATION IV NUCLEAR ENERGY SYSTEMS

Small Modular Reactors & waste management issues

HPR1000: ADVANCED PWR WITH ACTIVE AND PASSIVE SAFETY FEATURES

Technical potentialities of integration of reactor vessel external cooling in operating WWER-440 plant - Assessment results

Module 12 Generation IV Nuclear Power Plants. Atominstitute of the Austrian Universities Stadionallee 2, 1020 Vienna, Austria

Transcription:

High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors Now More Than Ever! Dr. Finis SOUTHWORTH Chief Technology Officer AREVA Inc. On behalf of the NGNP Industrial Alliance, LLC Washington DC Section ANS Rockville, MD April 12, 2011

Roadmap What is NGNP? What is the NGNP Alliance? 2006-present EPACT 2005 and NGNP activities to date HTR / NGNP design description Economics of HTRs Safety characteristics A little more about Fukushima Daiichi topics Q&A Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.2 Copyright AREVA Inc.

Next Generation Nuclear Plant History Next Generation Generation IV Generation IV Roadmap December 2000 to September 2002 VHTR Selected as lead concept for US Demonstration- New missions of hydrogen production and process heat applications Most passively safe of all candidate Generation IV reactor concepts NGNP drafted into Energy Policy Act January 2003 EPACT required 31 months to pass-- August 8, 2005, authorizing $1.5 Billion through 2014, and such sums as may be needed subsequently for construction EPACT 2005 called for DOE to partner with an Industry Alliance to partner for the demonstration and deployment of the NGNP. The NGNP Industrial Alliance was first formed in May 2006. Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.3 Copyright AREVA Inc.

NGNP Industrial Alliance, LLC R PTAC SGL Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.4 Copyright AREVA Inc.

Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.5 Copyright AREVA Inc.

HTR Design Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.6 Copyright AREVA Inc.

Long Term High Temp Gas Reactors For a Spectrum Of Applications SIMPLE LOW COST ANTARES COMBINED BRAYTON AND RANKINE CYCLES FOR HIGH EFFICIENCY PASSIVELY SAFE SUPPORTS H 2 PRODUCTION Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.7 Copyright AREVA Inc.

Key Features of AREVA Near-Term HTR Prismatic block annular core Conventional steam cycle Modular reactors Inherent safety characteristics Passive decay heat removal Large thermal inertia Negative reactivity feedback Minimal reliance on active safety systems Sized to minimize steam production cost Fully embedded reactor building Partially embedded alternative possible Steam Generator Reactor Circulator Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.8 Copyright AREVA Inc.

Fuel type Core geometry Reactor power Nominal Operating Parameters TRISO particle 102 column annular 10 block high 625 MWt Reactor outlet temperature 750 C Reactor inlet temperature 325 C Primary coolant pressure 6 MPa Vessel Material SA 508/533 Number of loops 2 Steam generator power Main circulator power 315 MWt (each) 4 MWe (each) Main steam temperature 566 C Main steam pressure 16.7 MPa Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.9 Copyright AREVA Inc.

Annular Core Arrangement Replaceable Reflector Permanent Reflector Fuel Columns Metallic Core Barrel Control Rods Reserve Shutdown Channels Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.10 Copyright AREVA Inc.

Cooling Systems Optimized for Reliability, Safety Main heat transport system Established helical coil steam generator technology Electric motor circulator with magnetic bearings Shutdown cooling system Active system Maximizes plant availability Maintenance Rapid accident recovery Reactor cavity cooling system Safety related heat removal system Passive cooling of vessel and surrounding cavity (operates continuously safety-related) Active cooling of water storage tank during normal operation (non-safety) Cooling Panel Reactor Vessel Water Storage Tank Natural Convection Flow Forced flow Red shows safetyrelated cooling loop. Black shows nonsafety related. One of two redundant loops shown. Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.11 Copyright AREVA Inc.

The Dow Perspective Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.12 Copyright AREVA Inc.

About Dow Diversified chemical company, harnessing the power of science and technology to improve living daily Founded in Midland, Michigan, in 1897 Supplies more than 5,000 products to customers in 160 countries Annual sales of $45 billion 52,000 employees worldwide Committed to Sustainability Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.13 Copyright AREVA Inc.

Dow Energy Uses 900,000 BBL Oil Eqiv / Day Or 0.3% of the World s Energy Oil & Gas Feedstock Ethane, Propane Butane, Naphtha Steam Power Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.14 Copyright AREVA Inc.

Dow Energy Plan Four fundamentals make the transition to a sustainable energy future possible. Aggressively pursue energy efficiency and conservation Increase, diversify and optimize hydrocarbon energy and feedstock supplies Accelerate development of alternative and renewable energy and feedstock sources Finally, Dow supports the federal government's efforts to provide financial support to enable leadership in advancing development of new nuclear power technologies. One promising example is the High Temperature Gas Reactor (HTGR), which has the potential to produce synthetic fuels and feedstocks when combined with gasification of coal or other domestic carbon sources. Transition to a low carbon economy Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.15 Copyright AREVA Inc.

Power, Heat & Steam Generation 4 GWs of self generated electricity More than 22 million pounds per hour of self generated steam Enormous direct fired process heating loads Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.16 Copyright AREVA Inc.

Why HTGR? Inherent safety co location N-X reliable process heat & electricity Neutral cost without cost of carbon Addresses all key energy policy issues Energy security Carbon footprint National security Jobs Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.17 Copyright AREVA Inc.

INL Economics Analysis of NGNP Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.18 Copyright AREVA Inc.

HTGR Layout For SAGD Integration Modeling or SG Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.19 Copyright AREVA Inc. 1 9

In US coal for electricity and oil for transportation produce about 3/4 of the man-made CO 2 Substitution of electricity from nuclear for coal and hydrogen from nuclear for oil would reduce CO 2 release by 2/3 Process heat from nuclear could eventually replace the remaining 1/3 Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.20 Copyright AREVA Inc.

4,000 INL Plant Capital Cost Development HTGR NOAK Plant Capital Cost as a Function of Module and Plant Ratings 750 C Reactor Outlet Temperature 3,500 3,000 AREVA - HTGR Module NOAK Plant (8-200 MWt Modules) Capital Cost, $/K KWt 2,500 2,000 1,500 GA - SC-MHR NOAK Plant (4-350 MWt Modules) Module Ratings 200 MWt 350 MWt 600 MWt 1,000 500 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Plant Rating, MWt Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.21 Copyright AREVA Inc. 2 1

Full HTGR Integration for Bitumen Recovery Assuming a central HTGR facility supplying 2,400 MWt of steam: Bitumen recovery of 224,000 barrels per day Reduction in natural gas consumption 81.8 billion SCF/year Reduction in CO 2 emissions 5.3 million tons/year Over 60 years this rate of steam supply from the HTGR plant would result in: Supplying 52 simultaneous well pads for 12 years each Supplying 260 well pads over the life of the reactors Covering 65,200 hectares of land Reducing natural gas consumption by 4.9 trillion SCF Reducing CO 2 emissions by 317 million tons Estimate the potential for 15 plants (60 600 MWt modules Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.22 Copyright AREVA Inc. 2 2

Characteristics of Potential Markets, cont d Products & Markets, cont d Process Heat, Hydrogen & Oxygen Petro-chemical, Fertilizer, Refining (in addition to co-generation, e.g., cracking operations, direct ammonia production, hydrogenation) Merchant Hydrogen 5.4MMtons (2005), separate from refining industry production and usage of hydrogen CTL/BTL (24 new 100,000 bpd plants) - Synthetic feedstock, transportation fuels (assumed that production would equal 25% of crude oil imports in 2008) Electricity Substitute for Coal & Natural Gas Plants - Emissions reductions & saving natural gas resource Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.23 Copyright AREVA Inc. 2 3

Petrochemical, Refining, Fertilizer/Ammonia market and other Co-generation 75 GWt (125 600 MWt modules) Oil Sands Steam, Electricity & Hydrogen 36 GWt (60 -- 600 MWt modules) Size of the potential market The Opportunity Integrating Nuclear High Temperature Process Heat with Industrial Applications Existing Plants Assuming 25% Penetration of Potential Process Heat & Power Market -- 2.7 quads* Hydrogen Merchant Market 40 GWt (67 600 MWt modules) Fertilizers/Ammonia (23 plants in U.S. NH3 production) Petrochemical Petroleum Refining (170 plants in U.S.) (137 plants in U.S.) Growing and New Markets Potential for 9.3 quads of HTGR Process Heat & Power Synthetic Fuels & Feedstock Steam, electricity, hydrogen 249 GWt (415 600 MWt modules) Electricity 110 GWt; ~180 600 MWt modules 10% of the nuclear electrical supply increase required to achieve pending Government objectives for emissions reductions by 2050 Hydrogen Production 60 plants Coal-to-Liquids (24 100,000 bpd new plants ) * Quad = 1x10 15 Btu (293 x 10 6 MW th ) annual energy consumption Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.24 Copyright AREVA Inc. Oil Sands/Shale 43-56,000 bpd plants 2 4

30 Economics Supplying Steam & Electricity Energy Price vs Module Rating & Plant Rating Energy Price, $/MMBtu 25 20 15 10 200 MWt Debt to Equity 80% IRR 15% Interest 8% Term, years 20 Electricity& Steam Supply Module Ratings 350 MWt 600 MWt 200 Equivalent Natural Gas Prices (Maximum # of Modules) 200 MWt / 1600 MWt -- $10.8/MMBtu 350 MWt / 1400 MWt -- $8.3/MMBtu 600 MWt / 2400 MWt -- $6.8/MMBtu Electricity & Steam Price vs Module Rating & Plant Rating 5 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Plant Rating, MWt Electricity & Steam Price, $/MWhe $ $/1000lbs Steam 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 Electricity Prices, $/MWhe Steam Prices, $/1000 lbs 200 MWt Debt to Equity 80% IRR 15% Interest 8% Term, years 20 Electricity& Steam Supply Module Ratings 350 MWt 600 MWt Same order as above 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Plant Rating, MWt Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.25 Copyright AREVA Inc. 2 5

HTR Safety A quick review Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.26 Copyright AREVA Inc.

Safety Functions in NPPs Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.27 Copyright AREVA Inc.

Safety Functions in HTGRs DAMAGE Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.28 Copyright AREVA Inc.

Safety Functionality for NPPs Anticipated Operational Occurrences accommodated with high reliability Design Basis Events Natural Phenomena (hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, floods, et cetera) as well as postulated faults accidents (LOCA, MSLB, etc.) Meet PAGs at EAB. NGNP is intended to be designed to meet PAGs at 400 meters. Beyond Design Basis Events Severe Accidents not important how you got here, its how you manage it and isolate it. (e.g. FD1 earthquake, tsunami-both worse than design basis) FD1 survived the beyond design basis earthquake well, it appeared. It is the BDBE tsunami that stopped the safety related equipment. Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.29 Copyright AREVA Inc.

Safety Functionality for LWR v. HTGR LWR BDBE management must have A/C to manage the accident decay heat removal must start within about 30-40 minutes to prevent core damage maintain primary containment integrity-in severe accident vent to atmosphere or secondary containment use hydrogen igniter or recombiner maintain spent fuel pool cooling -- could be done by a hose from a non-electric source fire water tower, fire truck, etc. just need to make up for boiling HTGR BDBE management decay heat removal must start in about 100 hours heat would transfer to earth by conduction, radiation and convection (passive) for the reactor vessel. Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.30 Copyright AREVA Inc.

Applicable Frequency Ranges of Regulatory Criteria This is a scan of the risk plot with the dose and risk limits Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.31 Copyright AREVA Inc.

Why HTGR? Inherent safety co location N-X reliable process heat & electricity Neutral cost without cost of carbon Addresses all key energy policy issues Energy security Carbon footprint National security Jobs Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.32 Copyright AREVA Inc.

Fukushima Impact on New Builds As a result of the Fukushima crisis, China has announced a hold on approvals for new projects, but this is not expected to affect projects already approved or under way. Four AP1000s are under construction in China two at Haiyang and two more at Sanmen. The first of these are to begin operation by mid 2013. Eighteen CPR 1000s, developed from a French 900 megawatt pressurized water reactor, are also being built, as well as Two AREVA EPRs, and Three indigenously designed CNP 600 units. Two HTR-PM? Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.33 Copyright AREVA Inc.

Fukushima Near-term Actions As a result of the Fukushima crisis, Near Term NRC Reviews verifying each plant s capability to manage major challenges, such as aircraft impacts and losses of large areas of the plant due to natural events, fires or explosions verifying each plant s capability to manage a total loss of off site power verifying the capability to mitigate flooding and the impact of floods on systems inside and outside the plant performing walk downs and inspection of important equipment needed to respond successfully to extreme events like fires and flood. Rockville, MD April 12, 2011 p.34 Copyright AREVA Inc.