Maintaining and Improving the Health of All Minnesotans

Similar documents
City of Park Rapids WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN

WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF NORTH MANKATO, MINNESOTA

Data Collection and Monitoring

Otter Tail County Local Water Management Plan August 31, Amended 2014

DRAFT Budget and Outcomes Committee FY18-19 Clean Water Fund recommendations (July 8, 2016)

Wellhead Protection Issues Related to Mining Activities Minnesota Rural Water Conference March 4, 2014

Appendix A PRIORITY CONCERNS SCOPING DOCUMENT FOR GRANT COUNTY LOCAL WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

Cannon River One Watershed, One Plan. POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING January 10, 2018 Rice County Government Center Faribault, MN

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT. Honorable Mayor and City Council Members

WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN Amendment

Using PTMApp Products to Develop a Targeted Implementation Schedule

1 ISSUES, GOALS AND IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES

Efficient, Effective, Responsive Update on Dakota County Groundwater Plan Development

11:10 Stakeholder Process Discuss stakeholder process for policy recommendations.

Updates and items for discussion

Drinking Water Source Protection General Information on Funding and Rating Projects

WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN FOR THE. City of Bertha. Nonvulnerable Setting

Nonpoint Priority Funding Plan for Clean Water Implementation Funding

Feedlot Construction Setbacks from Open Water and Wells

SUBURBAN EDGE COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE ALL COMMUNITIES SUBURBAN EDGE

DIVERSIFIED RURAL COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE DIVERSIFIED RURAL ALL COMMUNITIES

2 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Water Plans. Water Plans: Houston County LWMP amended 2012 Winona County LWMP

WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN Part 2

SOURCE WATER ASSESSMENT SUMMARY BROCHURE

RURAL RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE RURAL RESIDENTIAL ALL COMMUNITIES

Long Prairie River Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS) Report Summary

The Benefits of Wellhead Protection to Your Community

The Regulatory Framework

Environmental Resource Inventories. What are ERIs? Significance of information How to use them

RURAL CENTER COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE RURAL CENTER ALL COMMUNITIES

Reservoir age, increasing human population,

SOURCE WATER ASSESSMENT SUMMARY BROCHURE

Nitrogen and Pesticide Use

Source Water Protection in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area

Supplemental Guide II-Delineations

Wellhead Protection Issues Related to Mining Activities Minnesota Department of Health August 2009

Legislative Water Commission April 23, Jim Stark, Director Straight River, Becker County

MGWA Spring Conference April 19, 2012

One Watershed, One Plan

Cottonwood River Watershed: Water Plans

Shell Rock River Watershed: Water Plans

Nitrate, Well Testing and Rules

Primer introduction to watershed management Plan Process highlight the major steps of plan development Project types look at some examples of common

WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN

Calumet County Annual Groundwater Activities Report

Groundwater Protection Rule Framework March 2018

2015 WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN Part 2

Lake Creek Watershed Management Plan Public Meeting. Arrowhead Lake May 3, :00 PM

SOURCE WATER ASSESSMENT SUMMARY BROCHURE

Vermillion River Headwaters Groundwater Recharge Area Inventory and Protection Plan

Presenters: Laura DeBeer & Brent Hoffmann

Mississippi River Winona Watershed: Water Plans

SOURCE WATER PROTECTION: Developing a Plan that Works for YOU. Lyn O Hare Spotts, Stevens & McCoy

Des Moines River Headwaters Watershed: Water Plans

Public Water Supply Systems 2017 Year in Review

PROTECTING GROUNDWATER IN MINING AREAS. MME Workshop Duluth 2015 Bruce Olsen

CITY OF HOYT LAKES, MINNESOTA SOURCE WATER ASSESSMENT

Deborah Swackhamer University of Minnesota

WATERSHEDS. City Council Workshop August 21, 2018

Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality Collecting Land Use Data for TMDLs

Stakeholder Identification Plan

Hello my name is Joy Loughry and I am with the groundwater technical unit of the Minnesota department of natural resources. Today I am going to talk

CITY OF FARIBAULT WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN. This plan is in effect from July 2010 to July 2020

2018 Nonpoint Priority Funding Plan

Pomme de Terre River Watershed: Water Plans

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2010 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Report on Nitrate in Groundwater

Cannon River One Watershed, One Plan. POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING April 4, 2018 Rice County Government Center Faribault, MN

Groundwater Protection Rule Framework

Thank you very much for your thoughtful response. I agree with most of your observations. Here are some comments.

Clean Water Fund Performance Report. A report of Clean Water Funds invested, actions taken and outcomes achieved

Prioritizing Water-Quality Improvement Efforts on Agricultural Lands Using LiDAR Elevation Data

North Dakota s Nutrient Reduction Strategy. Presented to the 2016 ND Water Quality Monitoring Conference March 4, 2016

Minnesota River Basin Interagency Study

Water for All, Now and Into the Future: Water Quantity in Wisconsin. A report by the Sierra Club-John Muir Chapter

Support legislation that will protect the quantity of water in Lake Erie

County Geologic Atlases. Applications and Uses

Shaina Keseley MPCA-Rochester Watershed Project Manager

Groundwater Management Challenges. Jason Moeckel Minnesota DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources

URBAN CENTER COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE ALL COMMUNITIES URBAN CENTER

Water Governance Evaluation

Pomme de Terre One Watershed, One Plan Request for Proposal Responses DUE: May 19 th, 2017

Water Supply Work Plan for Clean Water Fund Activities

DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Clean Water Council Meeting Agenda July 21st, :00 a.m. 2:00 p.m. MPCA Board Room (Lower Level) 520 Lafayette Road North, St.

INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT Goal, Objectives and Policies

St. Joseph River Watershed 319 Project Technical Subcommittee November 3, 2003 Meeting Summary DRAFT

Welcome to Round 3 of the Zumbro River WRAPS Meetings Held in Theilman, Oronoco, and Rochester on November 15 and 16, 2016

Surface Water Management

3.0 Regulatory Framework

C Fish Lake C Rice Lake C Mud Lake C Weaver Lake C Elm Creek*

Wellhead Protection Plan. Part I

Groundwater Protection Rule Framework

Grand Traverse Bay Watershed Protection Plan:

Overview of Proposed Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program

Regional Stormwater Management Plan for Troy Brook, Morris County, New Jersey

Thief River One Watershed One Plan Prioritization Matrix Prioritization of Issues

SOURCE WATER ASSESSMENT SUMMARY BROCHURE

A Guide to Reviewing Minnesota s Draft Nutrient Reduction Strategy

Transcription:

Protecting, Maintaining and Improving the Health of All Minnesotans 7/10/17 Stephanie Adams 12 Hwy 28 E St 2 Morris, MN 56267 Dear Stephanie: Subject: Initial Comment Letter, One Watershed One Plan Thank you for the opportunity to submit comments regarding water management issues for consideration in the 1W1P planning process for the Watershed Planning Area. Our agency looks forward to working closely with the local government units, stakeholders, and other agency partners on this watershed planning initiative. The Minnesota Department of Health's (MDH) mission is to protect, maintain, and improve the health of all Minnesotans. An important aspect to protecting citizen health is the protection of drinking water sources. MDH is the agency responsible for implementing programs under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). Source Water Protection (SWP) is the framework MDH uses to protect drinking water sources. The broad goal of SWP in Minnesota is to protect and prevent contamination of public and private sources of groundwater and surface water sources of drinking water using best management practices and local planning. Core MDH programs relevant to watershed planning are the State Well Code (MR 4725), Wellhead Protection (MR 4720) and surface water / intake protection planning resulting in a strong focus in groundwater management and protecting drinking water sources. One of the three high level state priorities in Minnesota s Nonpoint Priority Funding Plan is to Restore and protect water resources for public use and public health, including drinking water which aligns with our agency s mission and recommendations to your planning process. An equal opportunity employer.

MDH Priority Concerns: Protection of Public Water Supply Drinking Water Sources Prioritize Protecting Drinking Water Supply Management Area in the Watershed 1W1P. The Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) boundaries establish a protection area through an extensive evaluation that determines the contribution area of a public water supply well, aquifer vulnerability and provides an opportunity to prioritize specific geographic areas for drinking water protection purposes. Aquifer vulnerability determines the level of management required to protect a drinking water supply and provides an opportunity to target implementation practices in accordance with the level of risk different land uses pose. The attached Public Water Supply Summary Spreadsheet identifies the high potential and low potential contaminant risk DWSMAs in the basin and sub watersheds. DWSMAs with high potential contaminant risk have groundwater that is moderately or highly vulnerable to contamination from land use activities. DWSMAs with low potential contaminant risk have well protected groundwater that has low vulnerability to contamination from land use activities. Some DWSMAs have variable vulnerability. These DWSMAs are a mixture of at least two vulnerabilities that may be comprised of low, moderate, high, very high vulnerable areas. This spreadsheet can be used to prioritize projects in areas with high potential contaminant risk. As some of DWSMAs extend across multiple watersheds and subwatersheds, they are listed multiple times in the spreadsheet. Protect Water Quality and Quantity Storm water infiltration basins and water storage may be of concern in vulnerable DWSMAs. Surface water storage and storm water infiltration can alter both the quality and quantity of groundwater in the surrounding area through groundwater mounding. Groundwater mounding may alter local hydraulic gradients, decrease the removal of certain pollutants, and mobilize contaminants that are in soil or groundwater. Metals, nitrate, and phosphorus are typically present at low concentrations in urban stormwater, and present a low risk to groundwater. Chlorides, however, are a significant concern because they are typically present in high concentrations near roads and commercial areas. MDH in cooperation with MPCA has developed a guidance on stormwater and wellhead protection. It can be found in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual at https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/stormwater_and_wellhead_protection Ensuring that public water supply systems have no well interference conflicts promotes public health, economic development and community infrastructure by maintaining a potable public drinking water supply for the community. Increase local awareness of available resources and technology for soil moisture monitoring and management of irrigated land. Encourage Local Government Units to utilize Wellhead Protection Plans to assess needs and changes in land use (zoning and ordinance development, and enrollment in CRP programs) to protect groundwater quantity and quality. 2

Prioritize Drinking Water Supply Management Areas impacted by Nitrate. Prioritize these protection areas for working with landowners on nutrient management and other sources of nitrogen such as failing septic systems. Additionally, it is important to target highly vulnerable DWSMAs for working with landowners on the advantages of small grain crops, perennial vegetation, nutrient and water requirements of corn and soybeans. Vulnerable DWSMAs are the most likely to be impacted by nitrates. According to the spreadsheet, Morris, Appleton, and Barrett have low levels of nitrates in the groundwater. Prioritize these protection areas for working with landowners in enrollment in CRP programs, nutrient management, and other sources of nitrogen such as failing septic systems. Prioritize Protecting Noncommunity Public Water Supplies in the Watershed 1W1P Noncommunity public water supplies provide drinking water to people at their places of work or play (schools, offices, campgrounds, etc.). Land use and management activities should consider effects on these public water systems. Find information regarding noncommunity public water supplies in the watershed in reports titled Source Water Assessments at http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/water/swp/index.htm#swa Protection of Drinking Water Sources for Private Wells Prioritize Protection of Private Wells Many residents of Watershed rely on a private well for the water they drink. However, no public entity is responsible for water testing or management of a private well after drilling is completed. Local governments are best equipped to assist private landowners through land use management and ordinance development, which can have the greatest impact on protecting private wells. Other suggested activities to protect private wells include: hosting well testing or screening clinics, providing water testing kits, working with landowners to better manage nutrient loss, promoting household hazardous waste collection, managing storm water runoff, managing septic systems, and providing best practices information to private well owners. Utilize information regarding pollution sensitivity of the upper most aquifers and wells, and nitrate and arsenic results from well testing to further target areas within the watershed for implementation activities. Unused Abandoned Wells Prioritize Sealing Abandoned Wells Unused, unsealed wells can provide a conduit for contaminants from the land surface to reach the sources of drinking water. This activity is particularly important for abandoned wells that penetrate a confining layer above a source aquifer. Sealing wells is a central practice in protecting groundwater quality, however when resource dollars are limited it is important to evaluate private well density to identify the populations most at risk from a contaminated aquifer. 3

Attached you will find information regarding drinking and groundwater prioritization with PTMapp and a listing of the data and information MDH can provide to help you in the planning process. Thank you for the opportunity to be involved in your watershed planning process. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (218) 308-2153 or Jenilynn.Marchand@state.mn.us. Sincerely, Jenilynn Marchand, Principal Planner Minnesota Department of Health Source Water Protection Unit 705 5 Th St NW, Suite A Bemidji, MN 56601-2933 Attachments CC: Trent Farnum, Source Water Protection Unit Carrie Raber, Source Water Protection Unit Chris Elvrum, Well Management Section 1W1P Interagency Core Team 4

Prioritizing Groundwater & Drinking Water Protection in the 1W1P Planning Process Watershed models used for prioritizing and targeting implementation scenarios in the One Watershed One Plan (1W1P), whether PTMapp, HSPF SAM or others, leverage GIS information and/or digital terrain analysis to determine the flow paths of runoff across the landscape and the pour points where concentrated flow reaches surface water features. While this is an effective approach for targeting surface water contaminates, it does not transfer to groundwater concerns because it only accounts for the movement of water on the land s surface. Unfortunately, targeting tools are not currently available to model the impact on groundwater resources. Therefore, the Minnesota Department of Health suggests using methodologies applied by the agency to prioritize and target implementation activities in the Source Water Protection program. These methodologies for public water supply systems include: Identifying Drinking Water Supply Management Areas (DWSMA) located in the watershed. Examining the vulnerability of the aquifer to contamination risk to determine the level of management required to protect groundwater quality. For example, a highly vulnerable setting requires many different types of land uses to be managed, whereas a low vulnerability setting focuses on a few land uses due to the long recharge time and protective geologic layer. These methodologies for private wells include: Evaluating the vulnerability of the upper most aquifers to determine the areas within the watershed most at risk from different land uses. Geologic atlases provide this information where available, as well as the statewide geomorphology layer, or the DNR s statewide aquifer sensitivity layer. 5

Data and information MDH can provide: Drinking Water Statistics 100% of citizens and businesses get their drinking water from groundwater in the Watershed. This information can help you understand where people are obtaining their drinking water and develop implementation strategies to protect the sources of drinking water in the watershed. A spreadsheet of the public water supply systems in the watershed, status in wellhead protection planning, and any drinking water protection concerns or issues that have been identified in protection areas. This information can help you understand the drinking water protection issues in the watershed, prioritize areas for implementation activities, and identify potential multiple benefits for implementation activities. Shape files of the Drinking Water Supply Management Areas (DWSMA) in the watershed are located at http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/water/swp/maps/index.htm. This information can help you prioritize and target implementation activities that protect drinking water sources. A figure detailing the Pollution Sensitivity of the Upper Most Aquifer in the Pomme de Watershed. This information can help you understand the ease with which recharge and contaminants from the ground surface may be transmitted into the upper most aquifer on a watershed scale. Individual wellhead protection areas provide this same information on a localized scale. This in turn can be used to prioritize areas and implementation activities. A figure detailing Pollution Sensitivity of Wells in the Watershed. This information can help you understand which wells in the watershed are most geologically sensitive based on the vulnerability of the aquifer in which the well is completed. This information allows for targeting of implementation activities to the sources of water people are drinking. A figure detailing Pollution Sensitivity of Wells and Nitrate Results in the Pomme de Watershed Underlain by Geologic Sensitivity Ratings from Wells. This information takes what we know about the sensitivity of wells to contamination and combines it with nitrate results to highlight areas of the watershed where there is known nitrate contamination of the water people are drinking. This figure can help prioritize implementation activities aimed at reducing nitrate levels in the sources of drinking water. A figure detailing Pollution Sensitivity of Wells and Arsenic Results in the Pomme de Watershed Underlain by Geologic Sensitivity Ratings from Wells. This information can help you understand which wells in the watershed contain elevated arsenic levels. 6

Pomme De Basin Public Water Supplies - Drinking Water Protection Concerns for Quality & Quantity Name County Watershed (HUC 10) Subwatershed (HUC 12) High potential contaminant risk - Focus on potential land use contaminant sources that may impact water quality WHP Plan DWSMA Vulnerability Drinking Water Protection Concerns Morris Stevens City of Morris- Variable (very high, high, low) Low levels of nitrates in groundwater, storm water infiltration basins should be located outside of DWSMA. Land use is a concern as Prioritize the sealing of unused wells in DWSMA and old public water supply wells. Appleton Swift Lower Pomme De Variable (high, moderate, low) Low levels of nitrates in groundwater, storm water infiltration basins should be located outside of DWSMA. Land use is a concern as Prioritize the sealing of unused wells in DWSMA and old public water supply wells. Barrett Grant Barrett Lake- Variable (high, moderate, low) Low levels of nitrates in groundwater, storm water infiltration basins should be located outside of DWSMA. Land use is a concern as Prioritize the sealing of unused wells in DWSMA and old public water supply wells. Low potential contaminant risk - Focus on sealing of unused wells and old public water supply wells (funding available from MDH) Morris Stevens City of Morris- Morris Stevens Muddy Creek Muddy Creek Low (DWSMA portion in watershed) Low (DWSMA portion in watershed)

Barrett Grant Lake-Pomme de Low (DWSMA portion in watershed) Elbow Lake Grant Barrett Lake- Elbow Lake Grant Lake-Pomme de Chokio Stevens Muddy Creek Headwaters Muddy Creek Donnelly Stevens Muddy Creek Harstad Slough Ashby Grant Pelican Creek Pelican Creek Ashby Grant Pelican Creek Pelican Lake Dalton Otter Tail Dalton Otter Tail Underwood Otter Tail Upper Pomme de Upper Pomme de Upper Pomme de Rose Lake- Tenmile Lake- Stalker Lake 54 Non-Community Public Water Suppliers Acronyms:

54 Non-Community Public Water Suppliers 0 Non Municipal PWS Acronyms: SWCA=Surface Water Contribution Area DWSMA=Drinking Water Supply Management Area WHP=Wellhead Protection Plan