Use of Biowin for Process Troubleshooting / Design for a Unique Wastewater

Similar documents
Table A1 - Peak Factors Used In Preparation Of Synthetic Database...1. Table A2 - Hourly Factors Used In Preparation Of Synthetic Database...

City of Loveland Nutrient Removal Evaluation Final Report

Presentation Outline

Nutrient Removal Optimization at the Fairview WWTP

Appendix D JWPCP Background and NDN

Secondary Treatment Process Control

Municipal Wastewater Treatment Improvement Using Computer Simulating

Biological Phosphorous Removal Is Coming! Michigan Water Environment Association Annual Conference, June 23, 2008; Boyne Falls MI

PLANNING FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL: WHAT STEPS CAN WE BE TAKING NOW?

Contents General Information Abbreviations and Acronyms Chapter 1 Wastewater Treatment and the Development of Activated Sludge

Optimizing Nutrient Removal. PNCWA - Southeast Idaho Operators Section Pocatello, ID February 11, 2016 Jim Goodley, P.E.

CSR Process Simulations Can Help Municipalities Meet Stringent Nutrient Removal Requirements

2015 Spring Conference

OPTIMIZATION STUDY OF THE ST. MARY'S WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

CRUDE COD CHARACTERISTICS SIGNIFICANT FOR BIOLOGICAL P REMOVAL: A U.K. EXAMPLE

Review of WEFTEC 2016 Challenge & Overview of 2017 Event. Malcolm Fabiyi, PhD, MBA Spencer Snowling, PhD. P.Eng

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

WASTEWATER 101 Fo r MOWA

ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF OXIDATION DITCHES. Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E., DEE Professor of Environmental Engineering The University of Memphis

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2014

SIMPLE and FLEXIBLE ENERGY SAVINGS And PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT for OXIDATION DITCH UPGRADES

BEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND. 1.0 Executive Summary

Meeting SB1 Requirements and TP Removal Fundamentals

TWO YEAR CASE STUDY OF INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE (IFAS) AT BROOMFIELD, CO WWTP West 124th Street Broomfield, CO 80020

Comparison of Three Wet Weather Flow Treatment Alternatives to Increase Plant Capacity

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2018

Tales from the Field: Troubleshooting Denitrification

COMPARISON STUDY BETWEEN INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE (IFAS), MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (MBR) AND CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE (AS) PROCESSES

MUNICIPALITY OF WEST ELGIN RODNEY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

RE ENGINEERING O&M PRACTICES TO GET NITROGEN & PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITHOUT FACILITY UPGRADES

ISAM SBR with Blower Assisted Jet Aeration Design Calculations For Lyons, CO WWTP Upgrade

General Operational Considerations in Nutrient and Wet Weather Flow Management for Wastewater Treatment Facilities Part II

Masses at Massillon: IFAS for Industrial Loads and Nutrient Removal

PILOT SCALE TESTS OF A UNIQUE APPROACH FOR BNR UPGRADE OF A SHORT SRT HIGH PURITY OXYGEN SYSTEM AT PIMA COUNTY, AZ

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2012

Characteristics of Nutrient Removal in Vertical Membrane Bioreactors

James Winslade Instructor, Environmental Resources Training Center Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville

Global Leaders in Biological Wastewater Treatment

COMPARISON OF SBR AND CONTINUOUS FLOW ACTIVATED SLUDGE FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL

INTRODUCTION TO NUTRIENT CONTROL FOR SMALL COMMUNITIES NUTRIENTS 101

Removal of High C and N Contents in Synthetic Wastewater Using Internal Circulation of Anaerobic and Anoxic/Oxic Activated Sludge Processes

Probabilistic Modeling of Two-Stage Biological Nitrogen Removal Process: Formulation of Control Strategy for Enhanced Process Certainty

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

Wastewater Terms for Permit Applications

Wastewater Tools: Activated Sludge and Energy Use Analysis

WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM

Upgrading Lagoons to Remove Ammonia, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus *nutrient removal in cold-climate lagoon systems

Comparison of Three Wet Weather Flow Treatment Alternatives to Increase Plant Capacity

Right click on the influent element and select name. Type Influent in the box. This should change the name of your element to influent.

LEMNA BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESS LEMTEC TM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Activated Sludge Process Control: Nitrification

Advances in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal at Low DO Conditions

Wastewater Nitrogen Characteristics, Treatment and Removal Options. Bob Smith, Orenco Systems, Inc. GEC 2013

W O C H H O L Z R E G I O N A L W A T E R R E C L A M A T I O N F A C I L I T Y O V E R V I E W

A Review of the Current State of Knowledge on Phosphorus Removal

Biological Nutrient Removal Operations. December 9 th, 2015 Presenter Georgine Grissop PE, BCEE

Appendix C: TM T-49 Nampa WWTP Capacity Assessment

Energy Savings Through Denitrification

Refinery Wastewater Process Modeling with GPS-X

At the Mercy of the Process Impacts of Nitrogen Removal Performance on WWTP Disinfection

Operation and Control of Multiple BNR Processes in One WWTP

Choices to Address Filamentous Growth

Inland Empire Utilities Agency Carollo Engineers, Inc. CH2M HILL

By Jack Wendler/Ripon WWTF

WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT. Bentonville Wastewater Treatment Plant Facts:

Efficient Design Configurations for Biological Nutrient Removal

OPTIMIZATION OF AN INTERMITTENTLY AERATED AND FED SUBMERGED MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR

NITROGEN REMOVAL GRANT WEAVER, PE & WWTP OPERATOR PRESIDENT THE WATER PLANET COMPANY. Create Optimal Habitats

ENHANCED BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITHIN MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS. 255 Consumers Road Toronto, ON, Canada, M2J 5B6

Watertown Wastewater Facility Plan. August 11, 2015

Sequence Batch Reactor A New Technology in Waste Water Treatment

operation of continuous and batch reactors. Contrary to what happens in the batch reactor, the substrate (BOD) of the wastewater in the continuous rea

Biological Phosphorus Removal Technology. Presented by: Eugene Laschinger, P.E.

Post-Aerobic Digester with Bioaugmentation Pilot Study City of Meridian, ID WWTP PNCWA 2010

THE DEMON ANAMMOX PROCESS: RESOURCE SAVINGS THROUGH SIDE STREAM TREATMENT, AND THE STEPS TOWARDS AN ENERGY NEUTRAL WWTP PRESENTED AT: NC AWWA-WEA 97

Troubleshooting Activated Sludge Processes. PNCWA - Southeast Idaho Operators Section Pocatello, ID February 11, 2016 Jim Goodley, P.E.

Dundalk Wastewater Treatment Plant

MUNICIPALITY OF WEST ELGIN WEST LORNE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

SECTION 8.0 NEWPCC SECOND PRIORITY CONTROL ALTERNATIVES

To learn: Boulder s WWTF. Nutrients and Carbon. Choosing the Best Carbon for the Job. Updates and Next Steps

A Novel Testing Approach for BNR Optimization in NYC. Vera Gouchev, P.E. January 23, 2017 NEWEA 2017 Annual Conference

COLD WEATHER NITRIFICATION OF LAGOON EFFLUENT USING A MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR (MBBR) TREATMENT PROCESS

Aqua MSBR MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

75 th STREET WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT UPGRADES PROJECT

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT MASTER PLAN 6. BUSINESS CASE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES

Nutrient Removal Processes MARK GEHRING TECHNICAL SALES MGR., BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT

WWTP Side Stream Treatment of Nutrients Considerations for City of Raleigh s Bioenergy Recovery Project. Erika L. Bailey, PE, City of Raleigh

Altoona Westerly Wastewater Treatment Facility BNR Conversion with Wet Weather Accommodation

An Innovative Approach to Retrofitting for Nitrogen Removal

DESIGNING LAGOON-BASED WWTP FOR <1 MG/ L AMMONIA (AND TN) IN <34 F WATER. Nick Janous Regional Manager

FURTHER EXPANDED FLOWS AND LOADS R3 INDUSTRIAL WWTP PROCESS ENGINEERING EVALUATION

Full Scale Testing to Demonstrate Anaerobic Selector Effect for Low Strength Wastewater

Sludge recycling (optional) Figure Aerobic lagoon

NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Evaluation of Conventional Activated Sludge Compared to Membrane Bioreactors

TWO YEARS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITH AN ADVANCED MSBR SYSTEM AT THE SHENZHEN YANTIAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Modelling of Wastewater Treatment Plants

Wet Weather and Advanced Treatment: Procurement Strategies to Secure the Right Technology

Transcription:

Use of Biowin for Process Troubleshooting / Design for a Unique Wastewater OWEA Plant Operations and Lab Analysis Workshop W. James Gellner

Outline Introduction / Problem Overview Plant Issues Biowin Overview Special Sampling Simulations for Plant Troubleshooting Simulations for Upgrade Design Summary / Conclusions

Plant Overview Turkey processing plant 37,000 turkeys per day Direct discharge permit Repeated ammonia and solids violations led to IDEM Agreed Order ATS hired to perform CPE

Plant Schematic CHEMICAL ADDITION (ph & Alkalinity Control, Hydrated Lime) PROCESSING PLANT (Kill Through Deboning Including All Screening) ANAEROBIC LAGOONS / FLOW EQUILIZATION (2.24 MG, 8.52 MG) ACTIVATED SLUDGE TANK (0.83 MG) CLARIFICATION TANK (0.22 MG) TERTIARY FILTRATION (Schrelber Fuzzy Filter, 0.4 microns) DISINFECTION (UV) CASCADE AERATION RAS EMERGANCY BYPASS EFFLUENT WAS AEROBIC LAGOONS / BACKUP FLOW EQUILIZATION (9.07 MG)

Effluent Requirements Parameter 30 Day Concentration (mg/l) Daily Concentration (mg/l) BOD 5 20 30 Total Suspended Solids 20 30 Ammonia (summer) 0.93 1.85 Ammonia (winter) 1.77 3.54 Oil and Grease 10 15 E coli 125/100 mls 235/100 mls ph > 6.0 S.U. and < 9.0 S.U. Dissolved Oxygen > 6 mg/l winter > 5 mg/l summer

Influent Loadings Parameter Average Daily Maximum Flow 0.61 MGD 1.20 MGD BOD5 3860 lb/day (760 mg/l) 8060 lb/day COD 8190 lb/day (1610 mg/l) 13300 lb/day TSS 1120 lb/day (220 mg/l) 2070lb/day NH3 790 lb/day (155 mg/l) 1620 lb/day Alkalinity 3120 lb/day (610 mg/l) 5280 lb/day

ATS / Hazen and Sawyer 11/2008 CPE / Process Evaluation Detailed sampling & analysis DAF implementation Design of improvements

Ammonia / Solids Violations Repeated (inconsistent operations) Overwasting of biological solids Lagoon solids slugs Overfeed of lime to biological system Poor settling filaments FLIP!

BioWin Overview Influent (Eff ANA#2) Influent Mixer RAS Mixer Schreiber MLSS Tank Final Clarifier FC Effluent Lime RAS/WAS Splitter WAS Full plant simulation software ASDM Activated Sludge/Anaerobic Digestion (IWA) Graphical user interface User friendly, Windows style Requires detailed characterization

BioWin Overview (cont) Steady state / dynamic simulations Tailored to domestic waste Ability to import/export data Allows multiple simulations for what-if and process sizing analysis

Why Use Biowin? Process troubleshooting tool Evaluate effect of solids on system performance Operations staff education Simulations provide good examples for operations staff Design tool Size / optimize new processes for improvements

Special Sampling Characterize influent Capture process conditions Allow for accurate representation of process performance

COD Components Total COD Biodegradable Unbiodegradable Soluble Particulate Soluble Particulate

TKN Components Total TKN Free Ammonia Organic Nitrogen Biodegradable Unbiodegradable Soluble Particulate Soluble Particulate

The Filtration Tree Symbol Filter Representation XX Not filtered Represents total sample (with particulate and soluble) XG Glass fiber 1.5 micron XM Membrane filter 0.45 micron XF Flocculated / filtered with 0.45 micron Traditional breakpoint between particulate and soluble Difference between XM and XG represents colloidal Used to estimate readily biodegradable material (COD)

Special Sampling Overview 3 days for each event Composite sampling Process grabs at 9am and 9pm Total of ~ 400 samples and analysis Special sampling performed in June (prior to DAF) and in September 2009 (after temp DAF installation)

Sampling Schematic CHEMICAL ADDITION (ph & Alkalinity Control, Hydrated Lime) PROCESSING PLANT (Kill Through Deboning Including All Screening) ANAEROBIC LAGOONS / FLOW EQUILIZATION (2.24 MG, 8.52 MG) INSTALLED DAF ACTIVATED SLUDGE TANK (0.83 MG) CLARIFICATION TANK (0.22 MG) TERTIARY FILTRATION (Schrelber Fuzzy Filter, 0.4 microns) DISINFECTION (UV) CASCADE AERATION RAS EMERGANCY BYPASS EFFLUENT DAF SLUDGE SAMPLE LEGEND WAS GRAB COMPOSITE AEROBIC LAGOONS / BACKUP FLOW EQUILIZATION (9.07 MG)

Special Sampling Results Constituent 1 st Sampling Event Unfiltered (mg/l) 2 nd Sampling Event Unfiltered (mg/l) TSS 165 154 COD 1513 1294 BOD 5 623 520 CBOD 5 529 421 TKN 221 234 NH 3 129 183 NOxN 0.5 0.43 NO 2 N 0 0.05 TP 34.8 36.6 PO 4 P 10.4 11.7 Ca +2 28.4 91.1 Mg +2 10.3 13.8

Influent Fractions Fbs - Readily biodegradable (including Acetate) [gcod/g of total ] Default 1 st event 2 nd event 0.27 0.560 0.515 Fac - Acetate [gcod/g of readily biodegradable ] 0.15 0.000 0 Fxsp - Non-colloidal slowly biodegradable [gcod/g of slowly degradable ] 0.5 0.150 0.27 Fus - Unbiodegradable soluble [gcod/g of total ] 0.08 0.083 0.058 Fup - Unbiodegradable particulate [gcod/g of total ] 0.13 0.283 0.29 Fna - Ammonia [gnh3-n/gtkn] 0.75 0.582 0.606 Fnox - Particulate organic nitrogen [gn/g Organic N] 0.5 0.250 0.25 Fnus - Soluble unbiodegradable TKN [gn/gtkn] 0.02 0.020 0.02 FupN - N: ratio for unbiodegradable part. [gn/gcod] 0.035 0.035 0.035 Fpo4 - Phosphate [gpo4-p/gtp] 0.75 0.297 0.32 FupP - P: ratio for influent unbiodegradable part. [gp/gcod] 0.011 0.560 0.515

Biowin Setup DAF - Future Influent (Eff ANA#2) Influent Mixer RAS Mixer Schreiber MLSS Tank Final Clarifier FC Effluent Lime RAS/WAS Splitter WAS June 2009 data used for troubleshooting September 2009 data used for process sizing

Lime Solids Scenarios Influent (Eff ANA#2) Influent Mixer RAS Mixer Schreiber MLSS Tank Final Clarifier FC Effluen Lime RAS/WAS Splitter WAS Lime feed varied to increase CaCO 3 solids in reactor CaCO 3 model ph modeling turned off to accommodate precipitate model

Lime Solids Results 180 18 160 CaCO 3 Solids = 3500 mg/l 16 Clarifier Effluent NH3N (mg/l) 140 120 100 80 60 40 MLSS = 4500 mg/l Temperature = 10.2 deg C CaCO 3 Solids = 2500 mg/l 14 12 10 8 6 4 VSS SRT (Days) Effluent NH3 20 VSS SRT (days) 2 0 0 0.00 500.00 1,000.00 1,500.00 2,000.00 2,500.00 MLVSS (mg/l)

Lagoon Solids Scenarios Influent solids of 100, 160, 300, 600, 1000 Ratio d solids in influent fractions & COD MLSS of 2000 & 3500 mg/l Three different temperatures No change in soluble constituents

Lagoon Solids Results - Winter 160 Steady State Simulations with Influent Q (0.6 MGD) and T=9.74oC 140 Schrieber Tank Effluent NH3N (mg/l) 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 100 167 300 600 1000 Schreiber Tank Influent TSS (mg/l) 3,500 mg/l MLSS 2,000 mg/l MLSS

Lagoon Solids Results - Average 80 Steady State Simulations with Influent Q (0.6 MGD) and T=17.73oC 70 Schrieber Tank Effluent NH3N (mg/l) 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 167 300 600 1000 Schreiber Tank Influent TSS (mg/l) 3,500 mg/l MLSS 2,000 mg/l MLSS

Lagoon Solids Results - Summer 1.40 Steady State Simulations with Influent Q (0.6 MGD) and T=26.07oC 1.20 Schrieber Tank Effluent NH3N (mg/l) 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 100 167 300 600 1000 Schreiber Tank Influent TSS (mg/l) 3,500 mg/l MLSS 2,000 mg/l MLSS

Process Recommendations Permanent DAF effluent 100 mg/l TSS LSI control strategy Denitrification tank / WAS Storage Increase / recover alkalinity Prevent float Chemical feed / flocculation / splitter New settling tank NRCY / RAS Pump Station

Reactor Sizing Simulations Inf (Eff ANA#2) DAF Carbon Bypass Splitter Inf & NRCY Mixer RAS Mixer Anoxic_1 Carbon Bypass Mixer Schreiber Tank NRCY Splitter FC FC Eff Lime RAS/WAS Splitter DAF Solids (back to lagoon) WAS Added denitrification reactor to Biowin Evaluated COD removal and NO 3 reduction

Reactor Sizing - Effluent Nitrate Anoxic Reactor Hydraulic Retention Time (based on Q = 0.61) Simulated Effluent Nitrate Concentration (mg/l) 0 hrs (no anoxic zone) 185 4 hrs 120 6 hrs 93 8 hrs 79 16 hrs 59 NOTES: MLSS = 3000 mg/l Temp = 9.74 deg C Internal recyle rate of 300 % of influent flow rate

Reactor Sizing COD Consumption 4,500 Filtered COD Consumed in Anoxic Reactor, (ppd, COD-XG) 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 COD Removed = 700 mg/l COD Removed = 550 mg/l 3,000 mg/l MLSS - T=9.74oC 3,000 mg/l MLSS - T=17.73oC 4 6 8 16 Anoxic HRT (hours, Inf Q)

Reactor Sizing Effluent Ammonia 1.80 270 1.60 240 Simulated Clarifier Effluent NH3N, (mg/l) 1.40 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 Efflent NH3N- w/o AX Efflent NH3N - AX HRT = 6hrs 210 180 150 120 90 60 Simulated Clarifier Effluent NO3, (mg/l 0.20 0.00 Efflent NO3N - w/o AX Efflent NO3N - AX HRT = 6hrs Q = 0.61 MGD Anoxic HRT = 6 hours Temperature = 9.74 deg C 3,000 2,750 2,500 2,250 2,000 30 0 MLSS (mg/l)

Reactor Sizing Internal Recycle 140 120 FC Effluent NO3N, (mg/l) 100 80 60 40 20 0 0% 50% 100% 200% 300% NRCY (%, Inf Q) Q = 0.61 MGD Anoxic HRT = 6 hours Temperature = 9.74 deg C

Reactor Design

Current Status Under construction Complete by 3/31/2011

Summary / Conclusions Biowin useful as a tool in both troubleshooting and design Illustrative tool Multiple simulations allows for process optimization Effectiveness of model dependent on characterization Tailored to domestic, but can be flexed for industrial wastes and unique sidestreams

Questions? jgellner@hazenandsawyer.com