PonTex Bridge Inspection Management System

Similar documents
TXDOT BRIDGE MANAGEMENT. BrMUG 2016

BrM (formerly Pontis)

Internal Audit Follow-Up Report

Report on. Texas Bridges. as of September Prepared by the Bridge Division Texas Department of Transportation

INTERSTATE CORRIDOR PLANNING

2012 MdQI Conference Quality Transportation- A Hybrid Approach. MDTA Facility Inspection Program- An Inside Look. Ryan C. Nolan Lillian Sidrak

Internal Audit Follow-Up Report

TXDOT Environmental Management System Verification Audit - Results. TxDOT Short Course October 16, 2013

Enhanced Pavement Management Program. Pavement Management Program

City Contract Management System (CCMS) Prime and Subcontractor Training

SAN ANTONIO STREET BRIDGE AT COMAL RIVER. Open House

WSP Parsons Brinckerhoff. How to Effectively Market to Prime Contractors. Ruben Landa Senior Communications Manager, Texas/Mountain Region

PEPS DIVISION SEPTEMBER 2018

INTEGRATING FREIGHT IN CORRIDOR PLANNING AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. Steve Linhart, AICP Caroline Mays, AICP

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORTS 101. Protecting Your Bridge Inventory for the Future Jason Kelly, PE

Jason Chapman Louisiana DOTD. [Transportation Innovation: Solving Tomorrow s Challenges]

Internal Audit Report

VALUE ENGINEERING FOR TxDOT PROJECT MANAGERS

Louisiana s Pontis Implementation

An Evaluation of the Condition of the Nation s Bridge Infrastructure Using Indicators Extracted from National Bridge Inventory Source Files

PEPS DIVISION. October 2018 Where are we now where are we headed

STATEWIDE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND REPORTING SYSTEM (STARS II)

SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION PLAN

PROJECT MANAGEMENT. Short Course. October 15, October 15, 2014

Why specify Surface Aggregate Classification A (SAC-A)?

Leveraging Strip Map to Build a Sign Inventory System

PUNCH LIST MANAGEMENT USING THE CLOUD. John Dames, PE CH2MHILL Blake Axen, PE TxDOT

NEVADA BRIDGE PROGRAM

Procurement and Contract Administration Challenges

MSE Walls Problems and Solutions

Austin Avenue Bridges Project Walking Tour Agenda

Wage Floor Discussion. City Council Briefing September 2, 2015

City of Dallas Zero Waste Plan: Multi-family/Commercial Update

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GENERAL SERVICES DIVISION

Louisiana DOTD Our Experiences with Developing a TAMP. Presented by Michael Bridges, P.E. at the IHEEP Conference September 30, 2014

STRUCTURE AND BRIDGE DIVISION

SS David L. Seago, P.E. Assistant Director of Construction Dallas District CST Conference

Responses to questions received following I-526 Wando Bridge closure As of May 31, 2018

SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION INFRASTRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES

Cable Barriers: Texas Research. Scott Cooner, P.E. Program Manager Texas Transportation Institute Arlington Office

Internal Audit Follow-Up Report

2017 Educational Series RAIL

Bridge Management. Developments in Short and Medium Span Bridge Engineering 94. Summary

STATEWIDE ANALYSIS MODEL (SAM-V3) June 5, 2014 Janie Temple

Historic Bridge Adoption Information Packet

Summary of Findings. Bridge Inspection and Monitoring. Introduction. Findings

LID Design Competitions

Rail Division 2012 Annual Summary

opensap course Build Your Own SAP App in the Cloud 2016 Edition

Distributed Generation. David C. Schanbacher, P.E. TCEQ Chief Engineer

BRIDGIT: User-Friendly Approach to Bridge Management

STATE OF ALASKA RFP NUMBER 2515H005 AMENDMENT NUMBER FIVE (5)

Texas Freight Mobility Plan. Chapter 1: Introduction

SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

PEPS DIVISION PEPS Conference Martin Rodin, P.E.

SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BRIDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION. Todd S. Thompson, PE 1

The Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Public Meetings January 2016

1. Q: Should the as-authorized Task 6 be included in the consultant cost proposals?

GE - Aviation, Services Supplier Quality Specification

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SECTION A.

Financial Close Best Practices

MGD 001. Guidance Document for MCS 001. Version 1.0

Design and Implementation of a New Bridge Management System for the Ministry of Transport of Québec

The ProjectWise Advantage

TxDOT Public-Private Partnerships Lessons Learned. OMW: Market, Communication, and Policy Trends in Tolling

MEETING MINUTES. ACEC-IL / IDOT Bridge Committee

Utilizing Software to improve Bridge Inspection and Management. inspecttech. Presented by: Jeremy Shaffer, Ph.D. Mike Schellhase

SEATTLE S NEW WMBE INCLUSION PLAN

DECEMBER P R O G R E S S R E P O R T

EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL SUPPORT

Using Integrated Asset Management System to perform Corridor-Level Analysis

Protecting Your Software Throughout the Development Lifecycle (and During Migration)

CONSTRUCTION SOLUTION (CIS MODULE INCLUDED)

UNCOVER SAGE 50 CIS. Leave the hard work on site

AASHTOWare Bridge Management Update. Todd Thompson, PE AASHTOWare Bridge Task Force Chairman

E2 D0 U 1 C 3 A E T D IUOCNA A T IL O S N E A R L I E S S E R I E S HUB/DBE/SBE R A I L

Internal Audit Report. Rail Project Management TxDOT Office of Internal Audit

INSPECTION OF STEEL & TIMBER PILING

WINDFARM DEVELOPMENT. FM 1847, Pharr District, Cameron County. Date. Footer Text

Current Trends in Data Quality and Integrity Issues in Inspections and Risk Based Approach to Investigations; EU perspective

Innovative Construction Management. Jim Foringer, PE - ADEC District Contact: (412)

Incorporating Performance Measures into NCDOT s Bridge Management System. Rick Nelson, P.E. Jim Edgerton

Release Notice. Version Release Date: June 18, 2015

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LAREDO DISTRICT EAGLE FORD SHALE: IMPACTS TO THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

Engineering & Capital Improvements. Shore Acres Civic Association August 21 st, 2017

SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION INFRASTRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES

TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS (TSMO)

CE & I for Construction. Brian Buckel. HQ Construction Division Chief Construction Engineer

King County Department of Judicial Administration. DOCUMENT EXTRACTION AND CONVERSION PROJECT Part C Scope of Work

Design-Builder Peformance Evaluation (DBPE)

Implementing EMS to Improve Operational Performance and Energy Management for Dallas Water Utilities. TACWA Meeting May 31, 2013

Proceedings of the 4th Annual Texas Water Reuse Conference. A Case Study for Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Plants in Sugar Land, Texas

OWNER INITIATED MODERNIZATION OF BRIDGE SAFETY INSPECTIONS

ALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY

Resident Management System Newsletter

Internal Audit Follow-Up Report

Final Estimates Level 2

Retaining Walls. and Going Beyond the Standards

Chapter 1 Introduction

Transcription:

PonTex Bridge Inspection Management System Transportation Short Course October 12, 2011

What is PonTex? System to manage bridge safety inspections Developed in-house Relational database Web-based Role-based Will replace (but not yet retire) BRINSAP

Why PonTex? or What s Wrong with BRINSAP Legacy brige inspection data (BRINSAP) resides on the mainframe. BRINSAP is in flat file format not a relational database. BRINSAP data is not live updated weekly (or whenever batched mainframe transactions are run).

Why PonTex? BRINSAP won t accommodate elemental inspection data. BRINSAP error checking is on back end. BRINSAP has limited audit capability. BRINSAP will not willingly integrate into a Bridge Management Information System.

PonTex Attributes Security PonTex security is "role-based." A user can only perform those activities allowed by the role. Data Quality PonTex validates data before it can be submitted for approval. Activation Requirements A set of required fields must be validated before a new bridge can be added to inventory.

PonTex Attributes Elements PonTex stores elemental data. History All inspections are stored in PonTex (not just most current). Audit All changes to bridge, roadway and inspection data are logged (who, what, when). Digital Attachments - Capability to store images, etc. associated with inspection event.

PonTex Access Each individual user must have an account. Citrix connection through internet: https://txdotsg.dot.state.tx.us

The Dreaded Citrix Gateway (more on this later)

PonTex Tabs

PonTex Overview: Inspection Life Cycle

Assignment Inspection Review

Assignments

Assignment

Assignments The "Assignment" tab is used to assign bridges to Bridge Division Inspectors, Primary Contractors, Subcontractors, and Team Leaders. Bridges are selected from the assignment tab, which can be filtered by County, Control, Section, System, etc. Company, contract information, team leaders, and subcontractors must first be created through the Company Tab, Contract Tab, and Users Tab.

Assignments A bridge is assigned to a Prime Contractor through a "Contract" and "Work Authorization. A District Bridge Inspection Office user can assign bridges to Prime Contractors. Prime Contractors can assign bridges to their own Team Leaders or to a Subcontractor.

Assignment to Team Leader

Inspection

Inspection

Inspection Team Leader retrieves assigned bridges. Span by span elements and components are created for on-system and Harris County bridges Team Leader conducts inspection, recording NBI data for all bridges and Elemental data. Team Leader submits inspection to Prime.

NBI Inspection Items

Review

Review Team Leader submits inspection to Prime. Prime accepts, rejects, or amends. Prime submits inspection to District Bridge Inspection Office. District accepts, rejects, or amends. Similar process when subs are involved.

Review

Review

Reject Inspection

"Prime Contractor" Amend Inspection

PonTex Implementation February 2008: Initial release (for testing only): Austin District Fort Worth District San Antonio District Dallas District

PonTex Implementation February 2009: Odessa District and Rio Engineering All districts moved to PonTex by July, 2011.

Initial Assessment PonTex Friend or Foe? PonTex is plagued by Citrix connection problems. Down time is at an unacceptable level. Inspection costs are up. Work authorizations are taking longer to complete. Inability to input and submit inspection data is affecting apparent compliance.

PonTex Friend or Foe? Citrix Issues Unreliable servers Load balancing problems (assigned servers) TxDOT is running the latest unsupported version of CITRIX.

PonTex Friend or Foe? Inspection costs have risen significantly from 2009 to 2011: On-system additions +35% Off-system additions +21% Increase in the number of extension requests for Work Authorizations. Increase in apparent number of bridges exceeding designated inspection frequency. Connection issues have slowed development of PonTex enhancements.

Friend or Foe? Connection issues have been elevated. TSD is working with TFT to resolve Citrix issues. Considering a stand-alone work station version of PonTex that doesn t require an active Citrix connection to input data.

Further Down the Road Implement version 5.2 of PONTIS (release date is unknown at this time). PonTex will feed PONTIS. Will use PonTex elemental inspection data to build initial deterioration models. Inspection data, deterioration models, and cost data will need to be integrated within PONTIS for bridge condition forecasting for various funding and action scenarios maintenance, rehabilitation, replacements.

Questions Tom Yarbrough, P.E. (512)-416-2499 tom.yarbrough@txdot.gov