TENSILE STRENGTH OF BRICK MASONRY. A.R. Santhakumar 1, S.Ashok 2

Similar documents
VALIDATION OF RAT-TRAP BOND FOR COST EFFECTIVE HOUSING

Section A A: Slab & Beam Elevation

Basic quantities of earthquake engineering. Strength Stiffness - Ductility

Experimental Study on behavior of Interior RC Beam Column Joints Subjected to Cyclic Loading P.Rajaram 1 A.Murugesan 2 and G.S.

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON COMPOSITE SLAB

Investigation on Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Beam Column Joints Retrofitted with FRP Wrapping

DESIGN OF RC ELEMENTS UNIT 1 PART-A

Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences

Experimental investigation of the use of CFRP grid for shear strengthening of RC beams

5.4 Analysis for Torsion

Study on the Behaviour of High Strength Concrete Beam under Combined Bending and Torsion with and without Hybrid Fibres

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017

SEISMIC RESPONSE OF A MID RISE RCC BUILDING WITH SOFT STOREY AT GROUND FLOOR

A Comparative Study on Non-Linear Analysis of Frame with and without Structural Wall System

AN INVESTIGATION OF SEISMIC RETROFIT OF COLUMNS IN BUILDINGS USING CONCRETE JACKET

PRESTRESSED CONCRETE STRUCTURES. Amlan K. Sengupta, PhD PE Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Madras

CHAPTER 4 METHODOLOGY

PERFORMANCE OF EXTERIOR PRECAST UNDER CYCLIC LOADING. R. Vidjeapriya & K.P. Jaya Anna University, Chennai , India 1.

Issues on Design of Piled Raft Foundation

EFFECTS OF SUPPORT CONDITIONS ON LINTEL-MASONRY INTERACTION

BEHAVIOUR OF COMPOSITE STRUCTURE OF RCC AND FLYASH BRICK MASONRY

Ultimate strength prediction for reinforced concrete slabs externally strengthened by fiber reinforced polymer (FRP)

Chapter 7. Finite Elements Model and Results

Seismic Analysis Of Multi Storied Irregular Building Using Flat Slab And Grid Slab In Zone III & V

Strengthening of RC Beams subjected to Combined Torsion and Bending with GFRP Composites

Effect of soft storey in a structure present in higher seismic zone areas

STRENGTH AND DUCTILITY OF RETROFITTED R/C BUILDING BY MULTI-STORY STEEL-BRACED FRAME SUBJECTED TO TRI-LATERAL EARTHQUAKE LOADING

Extreme Loading for Structures Version 3.1

Influence of Masonry Infill Walls on Seismic Performance of RC Framed Structures a Comparision of AAC and Conventional Brick Infill

SHEAR BEHAVIOR OF RC DEEP BEAMS WITH SOLID CIRCULAR CROSS SECTION UNDER SIMPLY SUPPORTED CONDITION AND ANTI-SYMMETRIC MOMENT

CHAPTER 2. Design Formulae for Bending

CHAPTER 4 PUNCHING SHEAR BEHAVIOUR OF RECYCLED AGGREGATE CONCRETE TWO WAY SLABS

A Performance Based Evaluation of a Wall- Frame Structure Employing the Pushover Analysis Tool

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS UNDER CONSTANT AND VARIABLE AXIAL LOADINGS

Seismic response of corroded r.c. structures

PRESTRESSED CONCRETE STRUCTURES UNIT I INTRODUCTION THEORY AND BEHAVIOUR

High Performance and Efficiency of Joints in Precast Members

SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF INFILL FRAMES

Performance of Reinforced Concrete Beams with Implanted Columns

BEHAVIOUR OF BUILDING FRAMES WITH STEEL PLATE SHEAR WALLS

twenty three Masonry Construction 1 APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2018 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS ARCH 631

twenty three Masonry Construction 1 APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2019 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS ARCH 631

SEISMIC STRENGTHENING OF INFILLED RC FRAMES BY CFRP

Effective Length of RC Column with Spandrel Wall

STABILITY ANALYSIS OF CONCRETE COLUMN - STEEL BEAM JOINT UNDER SEISMIC LOADING

SEISMIC STRENGTHENING OF PARTIALLY INFILL RC BUILDINGS USING BRICK INSERTS - EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON 3D MODEL STRUCTURE

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECT OF THE LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENT CONTENT OF RING BEAMS ON THE CYCLIC BEHAVIOR OF MASONRY SPANDRELS.

CHAPTER 5 FINITE ELEMENT MODELLING

Seismic Performance of Multistorey Building with Soft Storey at Different Level with RC Shear Wall

Strengthening of infilled RC frames by CFRP

Geotechnical Analysis of Stepped Gravity Walls

EN REINFORCED MASONRY DESIGN EXAMPLE 1 (NOTE: THIS USES THE UK NATIONAL ANNEX NDP VALUES)

GRAVITY LOAD COLLAPSE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS WITH DECREASED AXIAL LOAD

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON PARTIAL REPLACEMENT OF CEMENT WITH METAKAOLIN AND SAND WITH QUARRY DUST OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM.

ISSN: (p); (e) AXIAL FORCE-MOMENT INTERACTION DIAGRAMS TO CALCULATE SHEAR WALL REINFORCEMENT

twenty three Masonry Construction 1 APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS FALL 2018 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS ARCH 631

SEISMIC-FORCE-RESISTING MECHANISMS OF MULTI-STORY STRUCTURAL WALLS SUPPORTED ON PILES ABSTRACT

AXIAL LOAD FAILURE OF SHEAR CRITICAL COLUMNS SUBJECTED TO HIGH LEVELS OF AXIAL LOAD

Ce 479 Reinforced Masonry Fall 2005

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON FLEXURAL BEHAVIOUR OF REINFORCED CONCRETE HOLLOW CORE SANDWICH BEAMS

Interaction between ductile RC perimeter frames and floor slabs containing precast units

Flexural Analysis and Design of Beams. Chapter 3

EFFECT OF USER DEFINED PLASTIC HINGES ON NONLINEAR MODELLING OF REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAME FOR SEISMIC ANALYSIS

International Journal of ChemTech Research CODEN (USA): IJCRGG ISSN: Vol.7, No.5, pp ,


SIMPLE INVESTIGATIONS OF TENSILE MEMBRANE ACTION IN COMPOSITE SLABS IN FIRE

COLUMNS. Classification of columns:

CADS A3D MAX. How to model shear walls

SEISMIC DEMAND STUDY OF SOFT STOREY BUILDING AND IT S STRENGTHENING FOR SEISMIC RESISTANCE

PUSHOVER ANALYSIS (NON-LINEAR STATIC ANALYSIS) OF RC BUILDINGS USING SAP SOFTWARE

An Experimental Study on the Effect of Opening on Confined Masonry Wall under Cyclic Lateral Loading

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

Modelling of RC moment resisting frames with precast-prestressed flooring system

10.5 ECCENTRICALLY LOADED COLUMNS: AXIAL LOAD AND BENDING.

SHEAR OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALLS

Modelling for Seismic Analysis of RC Frame Buildings with Infill Wall and Special Shear Wall

SEISMIC RESPONSE OF MULTI-STOREY STRUCTURES WITH FLOATING COLUMNS

SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS USING CARBON FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER (CFRP)

Seismic Detailing of RC Structures (IS: )

Pushover Analysis of RC Bare Frame: Performance Comparison between Ductile and Non-ductile detailing

Seismic Behaviour of RC Shear Walls

DUCTILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDINGS

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development

Seismic Performance of Residential Buildings with Staggered Walls

The cracking behaviour of reinforced concrete beams under static and dynamic loading

Influence of Longitudinal FRP Straps on the Behaviour of Circularised and FRP Wrapped Square Hollow RC Concrete Specimens

Seismic Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Framed Buildings with Columns of Different Heights within One Storey

STRUCTURAL PERFORMANCE OF STEEL-CONCRETE-STEEL SANDWICH COMPOSITE BEAMS WITH CHANNEL STEEL CONNECTORS

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 125 (2015 )

SEISMIC TEST OF CONCRETE BLOCK INFILLED REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMES

ANALYSIS OF INFLUENCING FACTORS ON COMPOSITE ACTION FOR REINFORCED GROUTED CONCRETE BLOCK WALL-BEAM

EFFECT OF SHORT METALLIC FIBERS IN MIXED REINFORCED HRFRC BEAMS : AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

NEW COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION OF HYBRID BEAMS COMBINING STEEL INVERTED T-SECTION AND RC FLANGE

Code No: R Set No. 1

Seismic Performance of Hollow-core Flooring: the Significance of Negative Bending Moments

Effect of web reinforcement on shear strength of shallow wide beams

Experimental Study to Check Effectiveness of Stirrups and Steel Fibers as Shear Eeinforcement

9.6 Circular Prestressing

Axial load behaviour of pierced profiled composite walls

Tests of R/C Beam-Column Joint with Variant Boundary Conditions and Irregular Details on Anchorage of Beam Bars

Transcription:

TENSILE STRENGTH OF BRICK MASONRY A.R. Santhakumar 1, S.Ashok 2 ABSTRACT Normally Tensile strength of brick masonry is neglected assuming that the strength is negligible. However in certain circums tances the tensile strength of brickwork is a necessity especially, if we have to avoid either an RC Band or reinforcements. This is required in corrosion prone zones, such as coastal areas, splash zones, etc. In this paper an experimental method to ascertain the tensile strength of the brick masonry is suggested. The strength is a function of the stress variation across mortar joint varying from uniform compression to uniform tension. The test series shows an interaction relationship between the tensile strength of brick work and maximum to minimum stress ratio across the wall. The strength is also a function of strength of mortar.the series of tests shows the need for interlocking blocks to achieve desired tensile strength. Key words: Brick work, Tensile strength, Bending strength interaction curve, Cantilever span 1 Dean,Anna University, Chennai 600 025, INDIA. Email: santhaar@hotmail.com 2 MS Research Scholar, Anna University, Chennai, INDIA. Email: ashok@internetdrive.com

INTRODUCTION Brick has been used in building construction since civilization of mankind.it is one of the least expensive materials made from clay and used in a variety of architectural, building and industrial applications.it is probably one of the most durable material that can withstand aggressive environment much better than many other building materials.bricks perform very well in compression, yet it s tensile strength is almost negligible, which makes the masonry structure more vulnerable, during earthquake situations, as experienced in the Bhuj, India on Jan26,2001. This paper attempts to investigate the load moment interaction in a brick pillar and thereby highlighting the need for tensile strength in brick masonry. Comparison with Concrete Concrete, is reinforced witth steel, inorder to carry tensile load.unfortunately, there is no practice of manufacture of reinforced bricks, to improve the tensile strength in India. The tensile strength solely depends upon the strength of the mortar which is the weakest link, in masonry. A testing methodology is identified in this paper, to evaluate the true tensile capacity of the brick masonry. Test Procedure Fig 1. Test Set - up The Test set-up is shown in the Fig.1 and Fig. 2.It consists of 230mm x230mm brick pillar of height 450mm/340mm, to which a C clamp is fixed on the top, to facilitate applying a moment, while a separate arrangement is made to facilitate axial loading, as shown in Fig.1.

Figure 2. Test set-up photograph Load Application Loading is applied by the two methods. 1. Axial load is first applied gradually, till it reaches the desired value and then kept as constant. 2. Incremental Loading is done on the cantilever arrangement, till the specimen fails. By this methodology (See Fig. 3), the ultimate load-moment capacity of an axially loaded a specimen can be found. Measurement of Strain Figure 3.Load Application - Conceptual diagram To study the load deformation relation, it is essential to measure the strain, in the brick work both during axial loading and applying moment. A special mechanical strain gauge was designed and fabricated to measure strain in the brick specimen(see Fig.4).

Front Elevation Figure 4. Mechanical Strain Gauge The top and bottom frame of strain gauge, are fixed to the brick pillar (see Fig.2). The top frame is fixed on all four sides with screws, while the bottom frame is fixed only on two (opposite) sides, there by allowing rotation. The spring and bar arrangement on one side forms a hinge while the opposite side moves freely, in proportion to the strain, which is measured using a dial gauge. The strain measured at the end, is twice the strain at the centre of the specimen, as it is a triangular variation. Hence, strain along the central axis of the specimen is given as where =δl/2l, δl = change in length (from dial guage) L = Guage length i.e.,320 mm = Strain (1) BEHAVIOUR OF BRICK SPECIMENS The Specimen details and their failure pattern is given in Table 1. A typical curve of load vs strain is shown in Fig 5. A sudden change in slope of the curve is seen as soon as the cantilever loading commenced. A load vs moment interaction curve is drawn, using the results of the series of tests conducted.this is shown in Fig.6 and Fig. 7.The failure patterns can be seen in Fig.8, Fig. 9, Fig 10 and Fig 11.

Table 1. Specimen Details S.No Name Load (N) Moment (N Failure Between. mm) 1 450M1 650 292500 Brick and Concrete surface at the bottom level 2 450M2 18431 310500 Brick and Concrete surface at the bottom level 3 340M3 1440 597600 II and III level Bricks 4 340M4 6143 601750 II and III level Bricks 5 450M5 4733 647400 I and II level Bricks 6 450M6 7973 9337500 I and II level Bricks 7 340M7 90000 0 Vertical cracks on all four sides 900 800 700 AXIAL LOAD ( P, M) 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 0 50 100 150 10E-6 STRAIN Figure 5. Load Vs Strain

Figure 6. Load Vs Moment Figure 7. Load Vs Moment (enlarged scale)

Figure 8. Failure at the mid level Figure 9. Failure at the bottom level Fig.10. Specimen After Failure

Figure 11. Specimen after failure (another View) Figure 12. Specimen after Failure(close up).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The Load vs Moment Interaction curve (Fig.7) can serve as guidelines for designing safe masonry structures.the same is explained below. Consider an axial load of 1000N acting on the brick pillar of size 230 mm X 230mm, overwhich a cantilever beam of length L and cross section of 230 mm X 100 mm, rests as shown in fig.11. L 1 Figure 13.RCC Slab Resting on a Brick Pillar

The safe length of the cantilever can be determined (Ref eqn. 3) by equating the moment due to the cantilever beam, to the factored moment capacity (factor of safety = 1.5),which can be got from the Load vs Moment Interaction curve (fig 6), for a desired axial load. M 8 u 1.5 = L ( 23 x 100 x L) x 2500 x 10 115 2...2 L² - 230L - 2.3188M u = 0...3 L = ( 230 + 52900 9.2572 M ) + 2 L 1 = L 230...5 Where, M u = Ultimate Moment, L = Actual Length of the RCC Slab, L 1 = Safe Span of the Cantilever. The safe span (L 1 ) for the cantilever considered in the above case ( ref Fig.9) for various axial loads are given in Table 2. Table No. 2 Safe Span of Cantilever for various Axial Loads. Axial Safe Safe Span of the Load (N) Moment(Nmm) Cantilever (L 1 )(mm) 1000 200000 574.9891 2000 325000 759.8557 3000 450000 911.9664 4000 575000 1044.287 5000 685000 1149.326 6000 775000 1229.175 7000 885000 1320.751 8000 940000 1364.414 u...4 CONCLUSION 1.This paper suggests a method of finding load moment interaction curve for a typical brick pillar. 2.This paper quantifies the cantilever span that can safely be adopted for different axial load levels on the brick column. 3.This paper brings out the need for introducing techniques for enhancing tensile strength of brickwork.