Service Systems in Ports and Inland Waterways. Module code: CT /5306. Date: TU Delft Faculty CiTG. Ir. R. Groenveld

Similar documents
BERTHING PROBLEM OF SHIPS IN CHITTAGONG PORT AND PROPOSAL FOR ITS SOLUTION

OPERATING SYSTEMS. Systems and Models. CS 3502 Spring Chapter 03

Textbook: pp Chapter 12: Waiting Lines and Queuing Theory Models

Ferry Rusgiyarto S3-Student at Civil Engineering Post Graduate Department, ITB, Bandung 40132, Indonesia

INTRODUCTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF QUEUES 16.1 Introduction

Abstract. 1 Introduction

2. THE CONTEXT OF PORT PRICING

Estimating Port Network Traffic Capacity

Chapter 13. Waiting Lines and Queuing Theory Models

Simulation of Container Queues for Port Investment Decisions

COMP9334 Capacity Planning for Computer Systems and Networks

COMPETITIVE ACCESS AND SERVICE ARRANGEMENTS OF CONTAINER MOVEMENTS: PORT BOTANY CASE

SIMULATION APPROACH TO OPTIMISE STOCKYARD LAYOUT: A CASE STUDY IN PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS INDUSTRY

Berth allocation planning in Seville inland port by simulation and optimisation

Chapter 14. Waiting Lines and Queuing Theory Models

Resolution A.1072(28) Adopted on 4 December 2013 (Agenda item 10)

Safety of LNG-Shipping around Ports and Terminals

An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering Industrial Engineering Department. System Dynamics. Instructor: Eng.

Simulation of fruit pallet movement in the port of Durban: A case study

Fumigation continued in transit

Simulation and Logistics

Chapter III TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM. Tewodros N.

Analysis Risk labor assessment by queuing theory of berth and craft waiting containers to professional s formation in Hazard prevention risk.

COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF A MULTI-SERVER BULK ARRIVAL WITH TWO MODES SERVER BREAKDOWN

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR MOBILITY AND TRANSPORT

Ports and Terminals H. Ligteringen Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences Delft University of Technology Delft Academic Press

Fremantle Ports SHIP AND CARGO CHARGES FROM 1 JULY 2018

World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering Vol:7, No:10, 2013

Mathematical approach to the analysis of waiting lines

Floating Cranes for Container Handling

Discrete Event Simulation: A comparative study using Empirical Modelling as a new approach.

Mechanical support linkspans

V International Seminar on Port Engineering, Concepción, Chile. Site Selection & Design of Marine Terminals

Queuing Theory 1.1 Introduction

OFFSHORE TARIFF Valid as per June 1, 2018

Queueing Theory and Waiting Lines

STOCHASTIC MODELLING OF CONCRETE OPERATIONS

Container Transfer Logistics at Multimodal Container Terminals

Reliability Analysis of Dangerous Goods Transportation Network in Container Terminals

The Use of Simulation for Bulk Cargo Terminal Planning and Design

PART 3 TERMINAL INFORMATION

Container Terminal Simulation with Flexsim CT

Chapter 1. Introduction. 1.1 Research motivation

Network Analysis of Container Barge Transport in the Port of Antwerp by means of Simulation

IMPLEMENTATION, EVALUATION & MAINTENANCE OF MIS:

Justifying Simulation. Why use simulation? Accurate Depiction of Reality. Insightful system evaluations

Scenario-based simulation of revenue loss at seismically damaged seaports

SECTION 1: CURRICULUM SUMMARY. 1. Occupational Information. 1.1 Associated Occupation. 1.2 Occupation or Specialisation Addressed by this Curriculum

New Container Terminal Development for a Proposed Area

Optimal Design Methodology for an AGV Transportation System by Using the Queuing Network Theory

PORT OF MOURILYAN HARBOUR

A SIMULATION MODEL OF A SAILING CONTAINER TERMINAL SERVICE IN THE PORT OF ROTTERDAM

TARIFF. Applicable for internationally and coastally sailing vessels, and all the additional services, provided by Port Fleet Bourgas Ltd.

A BRIEFING NOTE ON THE PORT SECTOR IN BANGLADESH. February 15, 2007

A SIMULATION MODEL FOR DETERMINING THROUGHPUT CAPACITY OF CONTAINER TERMINALS

The ORP Process When developing new opportunities Shell Exploration and Production (EP) uses the Opportunity Realization

ANNEX 2: PRIORITY "PRE-IDENTIFIED PROJECTS ON OTHER SECTIONS OF THE CORE NETWORK (RAILWAYS, INLAND WATERWAYS, ROADS, MARITIME AND INLAND PORTS) "

Bottlenecks and Priority Issues for the Development of Shipping and Ports in North-East Asia

Generic Standard Operating procedures for transiting and importing goods/supplies

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

NOTICE N-4. Railway Fees Tariff

Container Terminal Modelling in Simul8 Environment

Adelaide Stevedoring Wheat Demand Management Policy and Reference Pricing

Coordination in hinterland transport chains:

A STUDY ON THE OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE AND SERVICE QUALITY OF TUTICORIN PORT

Lecture 45. Waiting Lines. Learning Objectives

Port Charges for the Ports of Brunsbüttel. Elbehafen, Oilport, Port of Ostermoor

Patrick Adelaide Stevedoring Wheat Demand Management Policy and Reference Pricing. January 2016

OPERATIONS RESEARCH Code: MB0048. Section-A

Port Information for Avedøre Power Station

Special problems of benchmarking ports and airports

REAL-TIME DELAY ESTIMATION IN CALL CENTERS

Port planning for the 21st Century aspirations and innovations

Optimising Intermodal Transport in Ports Feasibility Study. Presentation ESA Applications Workshop Rome April James Douglas - ContainerPort

The case of Poseidon Med, LNG Bunkering Challenges at Port

Simulation-Based Trucks Configuration for Twin 40 Feet Quay Cranes in Container Terminals

Simulation Analytics

Application of Queuing Theory to Libraries and Information Centres

GUIDELINES FOR FIXING TARIFFS FOR SHIPPING SUPPORT SERVICES (Output ii(e) of programme element 2.1)

Midterm for CpE/EE/PEP 345 Modeling and Simulation Stevens Institute of Technology Fall 2003

PIANC Commission Working Group Report Reviews

TECHNICAL BOOKLET. Mukran Port - Base Port for the Offshore Industry

WEB BASED OPERATIONAL SYSTEM FOR OPTIMIZING SHIP TRAFFIC IN DEPTH CONSTRAINED PORTS by

Overview of Technical Skills and Competencies

The Hong Kong Container Port a regional logistics hub

ScienceDirect. Simulating the port wet infrastructure: review and assessment

The impact of a B-to-B container transferium on the sojourn time of inland container vessels

Port Feeder Barge. Floating infrastructure for container ports.

Application of queuing theory in construction industry

Miami River Freight Improvement Plan Financial Management Number:

Higher National Unit Specification. General information for centres. Management of Bridge Operations. Unit code: F0LW 35

Making Better haulage decisions through Discrete Event Simulation

Although tremendous efforts have been made in worldwide port development following issues are still on the agenda in many (container) ports:

Click to edit Master title style. TNPA Port Consultative Committee (PCC) Port of Port Cape of Town Quarter 3 Port Performance Report January 2016

A Framework for Integrating Planning Activities in Container Terminals

From Data to Action. Fleet Support Hapag-Lloyd. Jörn Springer London November 2 nd, 2016

Dynamic Port Planning under Competition

Global position system technology to monitoring auto transport in Latvia

Study on the Plan of Taipei Port

G54SIM (Spring 2016)

Transcription:

Module name: Service Systems in Ports and Inland Waterways Module code: CT4 3 30 /5306 Date: 09 2001 TU Delft Faculty CiTG Ir. R. Groenveld

DelftUniversityofTechnology Faculty of CivilEngineeringand Geosciences Section of Hydraulic Engineering On behalf of thesection of Hydraulic Engineeringpublished by: VSSD Leeghwaterstraat 42,2628 CA Delft, TheNetherlands tel. +31 15 278 2124,telefax +31 15 278 7585,e-mail: hlf@vssd.nl internet:http://www.vssd.nl/hlf/lecturenotes.htm

CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...1 2. PORT STUDIES...2 3. ASPECTS IN PORT DESIGN...3 3.1. I NTRODUCTION... 3 3.2. O RGANISATION... 3 3.2.1. Port management...3 3.2.2. Cargo handling, stevedoring... 3 3.2.3. Planning, information, communications... 3 3.2.4. Training...4 3.3. S HIP HANDLING... 4 3.3.1. Berths... 4 3.3.2. Entrance...4 3.3.3. Aids to navigation... 6 3.4. C ARGO HANDLING... 6 3.4.1. Loading and unloading... 6 3.4.2. Land transport... 7 4. METHODS FOR SOLVING CAPACITY PROBLEMS IN PORTS... 8 4.1. I NTRODUCTION... 8 4.2. E MPIRICAL 'RULES OF THUMB '... 9 4.3. Q UEUING THEORY... 9 4.4. SIMULATION TECHNIQUES... 10 4.5. S YSTEMS AND SYSTEM NOTATIONS...10 5. QUEUINGTHEORY...12 5.1. I NTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF QUEUES... 12 5.1.1. The arrival process... 13 5.1.2. The service time... 14 Queue discipline... 15 A SIMPLE QUEUE (M/M/1)...16 5.3. T HE M ULTI SERVER Q UEUE (M/M/ N )... 21 5.3.1. Mathematical approach of the M/M/n - queue system... 21 5.4. T HE M/G/1, M/D/1, M/E K /1 - QUEUE SYSTEMS... 31 5.4.1. The M/G/1 - queue system... 31 5.4.2. The M/D/1 - queue system... 31 5.4.3. Approach to a M/Ek/1 - queue system... 32 5.5. T HE M/D/ N AND D/M/ N - QUEUE SYSTEM... 32 5.6. S YSTEMS WITH MORE GENERAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF ARRIVAL AND SERVICE TIME... 32 5.6.1. Approach to a E k /E m /1 - queue system... 33 5.6.2. Approximations to the value of average waiting time in E k /E m /n-systems... 35 5.7. S OME APPLICATIONS...38 6. SIMULATION MODELS...40 6.1. I NTRODUCTION... 40 6.1.1. Model types...40 6.1.2. Level of detail... 40 6.1.3. Simulation models used in stages of development... 41 6.1.4. Tutorial traffic flow simulation models...42 6.2. D ETERMINISTIC SIMULATION MODEL... 42 6.3. S TOCHASTIC MODELS... 43 6.3.1. Random number generation... 44 6.3.2. The midsquare method...45 i ii

6.3.3. The additive congruential method... 45 6.3.4. Linear congruential method... 46 6.4. S AMPLES FROM DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS... 47 6.4.1. The inverse transform technique... 47 6.4.2. Direct transformation for the normal distribution... 52 6.4.3. Convolution method...53 6.5. C OMPUTER SIMULATION MODEL ( STOCHASTIC SIMULATION MODEL )... 55 6.5.1. Procedure to build a model...55 6.5.2. Computer languages...56 6.5.3. Description methods... 57 6.5.4. Components and attributes...58 6.5.5. The structure of the model... 58 6.5.6. Example of a simulation model...59 7. ANALYSIS OF INPUT AND OUTPUT DATA... 68 7.1. I NTRODUCTION... 68 7.2. C HARACTERISTICS OF DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS...68 7.3. I DENTIFYING DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS... 73 8. REFERENCES... 76 APPENDICES APPENDIX I APPENDIX II TABLES OF WAITING TIMES TABLES OF STANDARD NORMAL CURVE, STUDENTS T, KOLMOGOROV- SMIRNOV, CHI-SQUARE AND CORRELATION COEFFICIENT i v

LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 3-1 PORT EFFICIENCY CAN BE LIMITED BY THE PORT LAYOUT 5 FIGURE 3-2 MODERN VERSUS OLD-FASHIONED EQUIPMENT 7 FIGURE 3-3 HINTERLAND CONNECTIONS IN THE PORT OF ROTTERDAM 7 FIGURE 4-1 THE DIFFERENT METHODS OF SOLUTION 9 FIGURE 4-2 REPRESENTATION OF A QUEUE-DELAY SYSTEM 10 FIGURE 4-3 COMPOSITION OF A MODEL 11 FIGURE 5-1 PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION 14 FIGURE 5-2 CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION 14 FIGURE 5-3 ERLANG-K DISTRIBUTION 15 FIGURE 5-4 PROBABILITY FUNCTION OF WAITING TIMES FOR DIFFERENT QUEUE DISCIPLINES 16 FIGURE 5-5 NUMBER OF BERTHS VERSUS CHANCE OF DELAY AND λ / µ FOR A M/M/N-SYSTEM 27 FIGURE 5-6 OPTIMUM NUMBER OF BERTHS IN A M/M/N SYSTEM 29 FIGURE 5-7 VARIABILITY VERSUS WAITING TIME 34 FIGURE 5-8 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AVERAGE WAITING TIME AND BERTH UTILISATION 36 FIGURE 5-9 ERLANG 1 AND ERLANG 2 DISTRIBUTIONS 37 FIGURE 6-1 SIMULATION RESULTS 43 FIGURE 6-2 P.D.F. AND C.D.F. FOR UNIFORM DISTRIBUTION 44 FIGURE 6-3 GRAPHICAL VIEW OF THE INVERSE TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE 48 FIGURE 6-4 UNIFORM DISTRIBUTION 49 FIGURE 6-5 SAMPLES OF EMPIRICAL DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION 51 FIGURE 6-6 POLAR REPRESENTATION OF A PAIR OF STANDARD NORMAL VARIABLES 52 FIGURE 6-7 STEPS IN THE SIMULATION PROCESS 56 FIGURE 6-10 DEFINITION SECTION 61 FIGURE 6-11 MEAN PROGRESSING WAITING TIMES 66 FIGURE 6-12 NUMBER OF VESSELS AT THE ANCHORAGE OVER TIME (IN QUEUE ANCHORAGE) 66 FIGURE 6-13 NUMBER OF INCOMING VESSELS OVER TIME (IN QUEUE CHANNELIN) 67 FIGURE 6-14 NUMBER OF LEAVING VESSELS OVER TIME (IN QUEUE CHANNELOUT) 67 FIGURE 6-15 NUMBER OF VESSELS IN THE CHANNEL OVER TIME (IN QUEUE CHANNEL) 67 v

LIST OF TABLES TABLE 5-1 EXAMPLE OF INTER ARRIVAL TIMES 13 TABLE 5-2 PROBABILITY OF 0 CUSTOMERS AT THE END OF THE INTERVAL 17 TABLE 5-3 PROBABILITY OF J CUSTOMERS AT THE END OF THE INTERVAL 17 TABLE 5-4 PROBABILITY OF 0 CUSTOMERS AT THE END OF THE INTERVAL 21 TABLE 5-5 PROBABILITY OF 1 CUSTOMER AT THE END OF THE INTERVAL 22 TABLE 5-6 PROBABILITY OF F CUSTOMERS AT THE END OF THE INTERVAL 22 TABLE 5-7 PROBABILITY OF F CUSTOMERS AT THE END OF THE INTERVAL WITH F > N 23 TABLE 6-1 OUTLINED MODEL VERSUS DETAILED MODEL 41 TABLE 6-2 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE VESSELS 42 TABLE 6-3 ARRIVAL FREQUENCY 42 TABLE 6-4 THE MIDSQUARE METHOD 45 TABLE 6-5 THE MIDSQUARE METHOD (2) 45 TABLE 6-6 DATA COLLECTION FOR EMPIRICAL CONTINUOUS DISTRIBUTION 50 TABLE 6-7 INPUT AND OUTPUT VARIABLES 50 TABLE 6-8 DISCRETE DISTRIBUTION 51 TABLE 6-9 SIMULATION LANGUAGES 57 TABLE 6-10 LOCK AND PORT SYSTEM 59 TABLE 7-1 POPULATION MEANS 69 TABLE 7-2 CHI SQUARE TEST 73 TABLE 7-3 KOLMOGOROV SMIRNOV TEST 74 vi

QUEUING NOTATIONS P(j) Steady state probability of having j clients in the system λ Arrival rate µ Service rate ρ λ/ µ n Number of berths u Utilisation λ (= ) µ * n W Average waiting time of customers spent in queue W (t) p.d.f. waiting times N w Average number of customers in the queue N a Average number of customers in the system ν a Degree of variability of arrival intervals - (c.v.) 2 ν s Degree of variability of service intervals - (c.v.) 2 c.v. Coefficient of variation of a distribution - standard deviation/mean s.d. Standard deviation T Average turnaround time (waiting time + service time) v ii

1. Introduction With the planning of a port development or the design of anew port, one isconfronted with unique physical properties, boundaryconditions and problems tobe solved. What ports have in common is that they all constitute a link in the transport chain and an interface between transport modes. As a result every port comprises a number of systems: a. The wet infrastructure " approach channel(s) " manoeuvring areas " mooring basins b. A system of aids to navigate, to enable the ship to make a safe landfall " system of towage " pilot system c. The dry infrastructure " terminals with cargo handling and storage facilities " through transport systems In port studies, generally two main subjects can be identified, viz. improvement of the existing situation, and design of a required future situation. For the purpose of optimising port facilities in relation to capacities demands, port operationshave to be analysed, a process which is often facilitated by applying complex port simulation-models. However sometimes a relatively simple empirical approach or queuing theory can be used. Concerning the choice of the method, always due attention should be paid to the local situation. In Chapter 2 abrief description is given of the procedure followed in port studies. The general aspects concerning the port design are the subject of Chapter 3. In Chapter 4 a closer look is taken at the possible solutions of the design problem, i.e. 'rules of thumb', queuing theory and simulation models, with increasing complexity. Much attention is paid to the Queuing Theory, which is the subject of Chapter 5. The most complex problems are solved with the aid of simulation models, which are treated in Chapter 6. The analysis of the input and output data concerning these models is the subject op Chapter 7. The Chapters 1 to 5 are part of the lecture notes of Ct4330 while Chapter 6 and 7 belong to the lectures of Ct5306. 1

2. Port studies In order to analyse and evaluate the complex system of transport modes which come together at a port, a clear specification of the objectives and criteria is a required starting point for any port study which involves planning and design of future developments. A port study is normally carried out according the following procedure: i. Generation of alternatives " analysis of the present and or anticipated cargo flows " determinations of the transport modes leading to traffic forecasts (as shipping). " principle dimensions resulting in a number of alternatives ii. iii. Refinement " screening of alternatives " preliminary engineering and conceptual plans of the selected alternatives " selection of the most promising alternative. Finalisation " detailed design and recommendations including the time dependent upgrading steps. An important criterion for evaluation of alternatives is "minimum total costs". The minimum of totalcosts is mainly determined by two main components: i. Capital and maintenance costs of port infrastructure and facilities and ii. Vessel time in the port and associated with costs, As these components are interdependent, they have to be dulyand jointly investigated for varying cargo and traffic volumes. The studyhinges on the comparison of the various alternatives and the optimisation of themost promising alternatives. 2

3. Aspects in port design 3.1. Introduction The ultimate symptom of port operational problems is congestion. The cause of congestion is not always easy to discern, but the symptoms can hardly be missed. The symptom referred to, is one of the following signs of congestion, or a combination thereof: 1. Every regular storage space is full and a considerable amount of goods is on the quays 2. A long queue of ships is waiting at the anchorage for a berth 3. There are queues of trucks or other means of inland transport. 4. Surcharges are levied on cargo carried to or from the port. These symptoms may aggravate each other. If for example, the quay is for the most part occupied with cargo, the remaining working spaces are inadequate and cargo throughput capacity will be more limited. This may result in fewer ships being served, causing longer queues. The causes may be either physical limitations in ship handling and cargo handling or organisational limitations. The most important causes are summarised in the next paragraphs. 3.2. Organisation 3.2.1. Port management A thorough studyof the local organisation and related procedures is essential when attemptingtooptimise the throughput of an existing port or when a master plan is being made for future extensions or anewport. By simply improving the procedures a considerable gain in the operation of the port as a whole, can often be obtained. This improved situation may defer the implementation of future physical extensions. A very common problem is divided management. In some ports the port management isn't under a single authority and divided between central and local governmental institutions. Aspecial problem for very small ports is that manytasks (port administration, port operations, harbour master and port engineering) may be in the hands of one man, resulting in an overloaded day - to - day program. Consequently little time is available for planning of future developments or even for short-term improvements of operation efficiency. 3.2.2. Cargo handling, stevedoring Delays in cargo delivery, cumbersome customs procedures and payment methods for duties and port charges greatly contribute to the inefficiency in cargo handling. One reason, which is often overlooked, is the overflow of storage facilities because the storage tariff is too low and the consignee is tempted to use the port facilities as long-term rather than short-term storage. Inaddition,care should be taken to ensure that stevedoring and the related administration is efficient. Sometimes, the location of cargo is not recorded and a search for goods is necessary when they are due for collection. 3.2.3. Planning, information, communications With the limited infrastructure and equipment, typical of many ports in developing countries, smooth 3

operation is only possible with a careful planning and execution. This requires quick acquisition of information and efficient communications with foremen, charge hands, etc. Berth allocation by the harbour master should obviously be co-ordinated with cargo handling plans.when releasing entrance permit, the harbour master should consult the cargo handling officer to ensure that equipment and manpower are available for the cargo handling and, in case of imports, that enough space is available in transit sheds or other temporary storage. The full capacity of the infrastructure can only be achieved if entrance criteria are established with due regard to environmental conditions related to safe navigation in the port and its approaches. Consequently, the harbour master should be kept informed about these conditions. The poorer the quality of this information, the greater the safety margins which have to be applied, the longer times are necessary because of the safety margin needed. 3.2.4. Training The skill of personnel involved in port operations strongly affects the functioning of a port. The extentof training to the level of skill required, and the throughput and/or efficiency of a port (or dimensions of a new port) are very much interrelated. It is stressed that appropriate permanent training facilities should be available locally: a single training course in a developed country maybe fruitful for ashort period but the experience obtained will fade away quickly. Training courses, adapted to local customs and procedures have to be given to all relevant personnel and at regular intervals. For instance courses for pilots, tugboat crews, harbour masters and terminal operators should preferably and predominantly be given in the home port. 3.3. Ship handling 3.3.1. Berths A very important item in port operations is the ready availability of adequate berth capacity, when it is required. Too few berths will give rise to queues for ships and delay in cargo delivery. Berths that are too small, limit the maximum ship size, which in turn limits the throughput capacity. Berths in unprotected or relatively exposed locations give special problems. Under unfavourable wind or swell conditions ships have to leave their berths to prevent damage from impacts with harbour structures and other ships or breaking of mooring lines. In countries which have a storm season, these, what are referred to as 'survival conditions', may be a factor hampering port operations in that season(i.e. conditions for which the port infra structure has to be designed to survive, but during which no cargo handling operations are possible). Breakwaters can help considerably against swell and currents. Berth orientation also plays an important role. For instance, a berth perpendicular to the prevailing storm directions will have a larger downtime because of an earlier attainment of the survival conditions, than a parallel berth. 3.3.2. Entrance The requirement that a ship can enter and leave the port safely is as equally important to port efficiency as the availability of berths. Although this is rather obvious, the consequences are not always fully recognised. The nautical operational limits can effect the port efficiency drastically. These limits are dependent on ship type and class, environmental conditions and the port layout and dimensions. The conditions for which entry is considered safe or unsafe are referred to as the port entrance regime. If 4