CITY OF NORTH MYRTLE BEACH OCEAN OUTFALL PROGRAM

Similar documents
Structural Stormwater Pollution Reduction Targeting Floatables, Gross-Pollutants, and Trash in Myrtle Beach

ULTRAVIOLET DISINFECTION FOR STORMWATER TREATMENT IN COASTAL CAROLINAS

ALMY POND TMDL MANAGEMENT PLAN

Septic System Impacts on Stormwater and Impaired Waterbodies. December 8, 2016 Tim Denison, Johnson Engineering Marcy Frick, Tetra Tech

FSA Conference June 2014

Factsheet: City of West Haven Water Quality and Stormwater Summary

MS4 Assessment Program to Satisfy Part V. Monitoring Requirements

ORDINANCE # 854. Stormwater Management / Operation and Maintenance Requirements

Factsheet: Town of Hamden Water Quality and Stormwater Summary

Factsheet: Town of Deep River Water Quality and Stormwater Summary

2006 WATER MONITORING REPORT

Maine Department of Environmental Protection Program Guidance on Combined Sewer Overflow Facility Plans

Factsheet: Town of East Lyme Water Quality and Stormwater Summary

City of Delray Beach MS4 Assessment Program: Part V. Monitoring Requirements MS4 Permit No. FLS

Hydrology 101. Impacts of the Urban Environment. Nokomis Knolls Pond Summer June 2008

Dogwood Swash Watershed Tour

Monitoring Stormwater Best Management Practices: Why Is It Important and What To Monitor

Gills Creek Monitoring Sites

Effectiveness Study Dana Morton & Greg McGrath. Upper Deer Creek Regional Stormwater Facility. Features

TABLE B.3 - STORMWATER BMP POLLUTANT REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES

DRAFT PTP-06. Activity: Water Quality Units

Factsheet: Town of Trumbull Water Quality and Stormwater Summary

Natural and Engineered Wetlands for Stormwater Management

Kinley Creek Monitoring Sites Monitoring Data Summary for March 30 th, 2017 May 3 rd, 2017

DNR Coastal Resources Division Coastal Resources Management Programs. Brad Gane Assistant Director Coastal Resources Division

Total Suspended Solids: The Hows & Whys of Controlling Runoff Pollution

BUREAU OF CLEAN WATER

Henderson Watershed WRIA 13. Chapter Includes: Tanglewilde Stormwater Outfall Woodard Creek Woodland Creek

NORTH GRIFFIN REGIONAL DETENTION POND - WETLANDS FILTRATION FOR NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION CONTROL AND ABATEMENT

WASA Quiz Review. Chapter 2

Kinley Creek Monitoring Sites Monitoring Data Summary for August 19 th, 2017 September 18 th, 2017

Section Treatment of Sewage and Stormwater

Bowling Green, Kentucky Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) Sediment Management Practices (SMPs) Activity: Temporary Inlet Protection (TIP)

Model Results Operation and Maintenance (O& M) Results Cost-Benefit Analysis Results Conclusions

Little Cypress Bayou Special Study - Subwatershed 1.10

SUMMARY REPORT. Brik Zivkovich, M.S., EIT Graduate Engineering Intern, Master Planning Program

12/19/2007. Due to limited land area, many coastal towns discharge stormwater into the ocean or into sounds/bays

Stormwater BMP Maintenance

Presentation to Surfside Stormwater Committee. 8/21/2012 Ken Harth, Surfside Beach VM Field Leader Susan Libes, Coastal Carolina University

DC STORMWATER PLAN CONSOLIDATED TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TDML) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Grand River Monitoring

PROTECTING OUR WATERWAYS: STORMWATER POLLUTION REDUCTION EFFORTS

City of Naples Beach Restoration & Water Quality Improvement Project

Best Management Practices for Stormwater Quality Treatment in Urban Settings. Lower Mississippi River WMO September 2017

Stormwater Management in Your Backyard: Stormwater 101

For the Basin Management Action Plan Adopted by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. for the. [Name] Basin Addressing [Impairment(s)]

EVALUATING LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO TRADITIONAL URBAN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Design and Maintenance Considerations for SNOUT Stormwater Quality Systems

Suffolk Downs Redevelopment. Appendix G: Stormwater Management Supporting Documentation

How Climate Change Impacts Urban Runoff and Water Quality Design

Water Quality in Stormwater Ponds

Bronx River Pollutant Loading Model Summary

WATER QUALITY MONITORING IN THE LOXAHATCHEE ESTUARY

Stormwater Manufactured Treatment Devices (MTDs)

Presentation to the District of Central Saanich Hagan-Graham and Tetayut Water Quality Monitoring Programs

Fall Line Input Monitoring on the Potomac River at Chain Bridge

Clearwater Soil & Water Conservation District

Captiva Water Quality Assessment Project Update Supported by TDC s Beach & Shoreline Program through the Captiva Community Panel

Pamela Reitsma Environmental Scientist Narragansett Bay Commission

Environmental Services

Wood Canyon Emergent Wetland Project. City of Aliso Viejo 12 Journey, Suite 100 Aliso Viejo, CA 92656

Table 1: Water Quality Event (WQE) Design Intensities. i 1 (t c 5 min) (in/hr) a b. tc c

Urban Geology Spring 2011

RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL NORTH ASH MANAGEMENT UNIT MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY

Vancouver Watershed Health Assessment. Burnt Bridge Creek Watershed

First Flush Water Quality Results 2016

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND IMPAIRED WATERS. Eric H. Livingston Watershed Management Services, LLC Crawfordville, FL

The Status of Pompeston Creek, : From Data to Action. Pompeston Creek Watershed Association

4. Ponds and infiltration BMPs can achieve 60 to 100% removal efficiencies for sediment.

Final TMDL Implementation Plan. Prepared for Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

Evaluation of Water Quality Effects of Stormwater Pond Construction in Horry County, South Carolina

Appendix A Stormwater Site Plan Report Short Form

Property Management: Protecting Your Stormwater Facilities

Continuous records for the Chariton River indicate that 2004 was an average water year, with total flow approximately equal to the average annual

City of Texarkana, Arkansas. Storm Water Pollution

Savin Hill Cove Water Quality Monitoring Program. Morrissey Boulevard Drainage Conduit Project Executive Summary

Nonpoint Source Pollution A Challenge to Control

Common Pitfalls in BMP Selection and Implementation. 19 th Annual Southeastern Lakes Management Conference Winston-Salem, NC

Drainage Wells A Dual Purpose

2014 ASSINIBOINE RIVER MONITORING REPORT

Biofilter Wetland at Harrow Run Water Quality Evaluation of Pollutant Removal Efficiency from a Tailwater Recovery System

Connecticut Jordan Cove Urban Watershed Section 319 National Monitoring Program Project

Stormwater Evaluation Phase II Stormwater Sampling

Georgia DOT s Fresh Approach to Improving Water Quality on Roadway Projects. The New Drainage Manual October 10, 2014

By: Jake Pulfer & Steve Zweber

October 29, Monitoring Data Analysis for September 20 October 21, Gills Creek Monitoring Sites

Globeville Landing Outfall Surface Water. December 12, 2017 Andrew Ross, Jon Novick Denver Department of Public Health & Environment

Georgia s Unified Stormwater Sizing Criteria The Old, the New, and the Misunderstood

The Storm Water Quality Benefits of Flood Buyouts. City of Birmingham Edwin Revell, CFM March 10, 2011 ASCE Alabama Section Winter Meeting

The Next Generation of Stormwater Management and Site Design. Melanie R. Grigsby, P.E. Stormwater Resource Manager, City of Fort Myers

Trying to keep a step ahead: How Framingham is preparing for the new MS4 requirements

Delaware River Basin Commission

South Carolina Water Quality Standards. Heather Preston DHEC Bureau of Water October 14, 2008

Effectiveness of Non-Structural Measures in Watershed Restoration

2020 Facilities Plan State of the Art Report. Table of Contents. Chapter 1: Introduction Appendix 1A: Production Theory...

New York City MS4 Permit Activities Annual Conference. Florida Stormwater Association

Overview of the 2016 Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit

Stormwater Data Characterization Results from Phase I Monitoring

The Collaborative Quest for Water Quality: Teaming Towns and Engineers for Assessment, Selection, and Construction of Stormwater Management Practices

Warner Robins Stormwater Local Design Manual

Transcription:

CITY OF NORTH MYRTLE BEACH OCEAN OUTFALL PROGRAM Reduction of Pollutant Load as a Stormwater Management Option Strategies and Tools to Protect and Restore Coastal Water Quality Kevin D. Blayton, PE City Engineer - Public Works Director December 8, 2016

Main Street Design/Permitting

Main Street Project Design Goals!! Eliminate Five (5) Drainage Outfalls from the Beach!! Improve Water Quality Using BMP s!! Reduce/Eliminate Beach Advisories!! Improve Drainage Characteristics and Reduce Flooding!! Establish Baseline for Future Projects!! Monitor and Report Water Quality!! BMP Performance!! Pre and Post Construction Monitoring

Main Street Basin Characteristics!!100± Acre Drainage Basin - Combination of five (5) Drainage Basins into one (1)!! Highly Impervious (70%)!! Flooding between 2 and 10-Year Storm Events!! Existing Topography (from elevation 25.0 7.0 )!!All Stormwater Ultimately Outfalls to the Beach!! Poor Water Quality!! Beach Advisories (after certain rainfall events)

Drainage Basin Map 2 nd Ave. North Beach Outfall Proposed Outfall 3 rd Ave. South 1 st Ave. South 2 rd Ave. South Existing 6 th Ave. South Outfall 72 Existing Beach Outfalls

Existing Main Street Ocean Outfall (before project)

Existing Water Quality Issues!!70% or Greater of Drainage Basin is Impervious Area -! Pavement, Roads / Parking Lots -! Roof Tops -! Coquina Parking Lots!! Limited Available/Existing BMP s - Older Developments Prior Stormwater Regulations!! Debris, Floatables, and Sediment Oils/Greases - Sand -! Plastics -! Cigarette Butts, Etc.!! Beach Advisories!! Public Health Impacts!! Community Business Impacts!! Beach Erosion

Outfall Plan View Landside Off-Shore Side Overall Project

Development of the plume in the presence of a cross current, which flows from left to right and is indicated by red dye. Stormwater Plume Ocean Currents

Storm Drainage Plume Atlantic Ocean Beach Far-field plume development. Contours mark the isolines of constant levels of single sample concentration of bacteria per 100ml. The regulatory contour is 104 bacteria per 100 ml of water. The two culverts are shown as black lines.

Permitting Federal! Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)! U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service! National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)! United States Coast Guard! U.S. Army Corp of Engineers State! S.C. Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC)! S.C. Department of Natural Resources (SCDNR)! S.C. Historic Preservation Office (SCHPO)! SCDHEC Ocean and Coastal Resource Management (SCOCRM) Over 2! Year Process

BMP Selection

Use of Best Management Practices (BMP s)!! Sediment Boxes Upstream and Downstream (debris and floatables)!! The Snout Catch Basin with Deep Sumps and Screens (debris, floatables, oils / greases)!! Catch Basin Inserts (debris and sediments)!! Bioskirts (oil / greases and kill bacteria)!! Street Sweeping!! Vacuum Truck for Maintenance of System (vacuum sediments and debris from catch basins)!! Pollution Prevention / Good Housekeeping!! Public Education!! Ocean Water / Plume Study!! Use of Sea Water for Passive Treatment Within Outfall Pipe

Structure #2 & 2A Structure #3 Structure #8 Structure #1 Structure #5 Structure #9 Structure #6 Main Street (Street-End) Land Side

Off Shore Side Landside 60 Check Valve Outfall Pipe Structure #1

Structure #3 Structure #2A Structure #2 Example of Sediment Box Design

96 Snout BENEFITS!! Removal of Oil and Sediments!! Reduction of Coliforms!! Removal of Floatables!! Bacteria Kill (Bio-Skirt) Structures #2 & 2A Example of Sediment Box Design

BENEFITS!! Trap of Oil and Sediments!! Traps of Floatables!! Settlement of Solids and Grit!! Bacteria Kills (Bio-Skirt)!! Low Head Loss Example of The Snout

Catch Basin with Deep Sumps and Hoods

Sediment Boxes

WQ Sampling Protocol Dr. Susan Libes Director, Waccamaw Watershed Academy Professor of Marine Science and Chemistry Burroughs & Chapin Center for Marine & Wetland Studies Coastal Carolina University

Water Quality Assessment: Objectives and Plan!!"#$%&'(&)#*+,-%&%.%/+&0%#/&)1/)%/+-#21/$&#/3& *144,+#/+&41#3$&51-&,/+-%#+%3&617&#+&+"-%%&$8+%$& +"#+&-%*-%$%/+&#91,+&::;&15&+"%&617&8/+1&+"%& 1,<#44&91=>&&?"-%%&%.%/+$&)10*4%+%3>&!!"#$%&''(&&31),0%/+&@A!&%B)8%/)8%$&,$8/C&DE& $+1-0&%.%/+$>&! F%3,)21/&8/&%.%/+&0%#/&)1/)%/+-#21/&9%+7%%/&+71&,/+-%#+%3&#/3&1/%&+-%#+%3&617>&G$%&15&HAI$&8$&5#.1-%3& 9J&+"%&&)144#91-#+1-$&1/&+"%&'/+%-/#21/#4&@A!&K#+#9#$%& *-1L%)+(&777>90*3#+#9#$%>1-C&& &&! M4$1&+-J&+1&%$20#+%&41#3&-%3,)21/$>&

Sampling Site Map 1 st Ave S Phase I only 2 nd Ave N Main St OuFall Pipe Phase II only

Pollutants of concern Ambient Water Quality Criteria R.61-68 Fecal Indicator Bacteria Enterococcus (recrea2onal saltwater indicator) E. coli (recrea2onal freshwater indicator) Sediment Turbidity Total suspended solids and vola2le solids Poten2al contributors to low oxygen (hypoxia) Vola2le solids Biochemical Oxygen Demand (5-day) Nutrients (Total Nitrogen & Total Phosphorus (par2culate and dissolved), nitrate + nitrite, orthophosphate)

Equipment deployment In-situ measurements Measured in one-minute intervals Parameters: Water level Water velocity Water discharge Temperature Conduc2vity Dissolved oxygen

Phase I hydrographs! Z#+%-&4%.%4&$"17/&9%417&78+"&0#=80,0&38$)"#-C%&-#+%&P)5$Q&#/3& +1+#4&-,/1]&.14,0%>&&! R%-J&6#$"J>&&H.%/+&8$&31/%&78+"8/&#&5%7&"1,-$&$1&$#0*48/C&"#$&+1&9%& 5#$+>&! V%%3&#+&4%#$+&^>_T`&-#8/&+1&C%/%-#+%&$,B)8%/+&617&+1&$#0*4%& A#8/&N+& _ /3 &M.%& V&

Pollutant behavior in untreated flows NSQD = EPA s Na,onal Stormwater Quality Database Fecal bacteria: consistently contravene water quality criteria, especially at Main Street. All E. coli above NSQD median. Total suspended solids: maximum loads of 30 to 35 lbs per event. Concentra2ons above NSQD median at Main Street. VolaLle solids: 30 to 100% of TSS, averaging 50% => organic rich! BOD: mostly > 5 mg/l with max of 25 mg/l. Above NSQD median at Main Street. Nutrients: 20% of nitrogen and 40 to 60% of phosphorus is par2culate and should be sehable. Levels generally above US EPA eutrophica2on criteria. TP and Orthophosphate above NSQD median. One site was a pond that had no ou<low during Phase I. Elevated bacteria and nutrients. Perfect BMP!

Outfall pipe results Sensors have been in place since Dec 2015 with some interrup2ons for comple2on of overland construc2on. Preliminary observa2ons Tidal behavior which complicates load reduc2on assessments Resulted in some upstream flow adjustments Current configura2on Maximum velocity = 2.8 j/s Tidal range = 10 to 15 inches Conduc2vity is similar to untreated flows, but shows some brief increases on the start of the ebb 2de that might be backflow. Oxygen levels are very low prior to ini2a2on of flows.

Outfall pipe hydrograph Sensors located between sediment and mixing boxes. Depending on when the rain hits on a 2dal cycle, runoff flushes through in one to two cycles. Other perspec2ve on load calcula2ons. 60 50 40 30 20 10 0-10 1:12 August 18, 2016 Ou<all Pipe Storm Event Q max = 3.6 cfs 93,407 gallons 6:00 10:48 15:36 20:24 Water Level (in) Velocity x 10 (X/s) Rainfall (in) 1:12 6:00 10:48 15:36 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30

Current status! V17&1/&$+#/39J&+1& )#*+,-%&a,#485j8/c&-#8/& %.%/+$>&!!,44%3&#/3&-%*4#)%3&C%#-& 8/&S)+19%-&+1& #))10013#+%&n,--8)#/%& A#h"%7>& n,--8)#/%&q1#a,8/&s)+19%-&_^dt&! @%417U0%38#/&*-%)8*8+#21/& *-%38)+%3&51-&+"8$&78/+%-&3,%& +1&g#&V8o#&)1/3821/$>&! H=*%)+%3&+1&9%&$"1-+&48.%3p&

Construction

INSTALLED SMALLER SNOUT WITH BIO-SKIRT

Typical Sheeting Wall Trestle Typical Pipe Laying (Surf Zone) (Trench Sheeting)

Vacuum -10.0 psi to -11.0 psi Equals 55,471 lbs Force

Pipe Sleepers

Completed Project Facing Seaward

Completed Project Facing Landward

QUESTIONS? With the Assistance of DDC Engineering American Bridge RH Moore CCU Center for Marine and Wetland Studies