AMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA

Similar documents
New Jersey Pilot Study

Performance Measures for Transportation Planning Part 1

Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

Appendix D Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS

Regional Performance Measures Annual Progress Report TPO Board - 2/4/2016 Presentation by: Chris Wichman, Senior Planner

INTERSTATE CORRIDOR PLANNING

What is the Dakota County Principal Arterial Study?

Infrastructure and Growth Leadership Advisory Group Ideas and Approaches Survey

Database and Travel Demand Model

GDOT-Office of Planning Update

Summary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Memphis MPO March 30, 2015

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

Tri-County Regional Planning Commission 2045 Regional Metropolitan Transportation Plan Goals and Objectives Adopted March 22, 2017

1003 K Street NW, Suite 209 Washington, DC MEMORANDUM. Matthew Ridgway, Nat Bottigheimer, and Alex Rixey, Fehr & Peers

Mobility and System Reliability Goal

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

Appendix O Level of Service Standard and Measurements

Highest Priority Performance Measures for the TPP

Appendix K: Project Prioritization Criteria

Moving the first state forward! Delaware s Statewide Long- Range Transportation Plan November 17, 2010 WILMAPCO Our Town

Highway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan. TAB September 20, 2017

MAP 21 Freight Provisions and Seaports

Northern Virginia Region Draft Needs Summary

Chapter 10 Goals, Objectives + Policies

INDIANA S INTERMODAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Stephen C. Smith Planning Manager, Transportation Planning Division Indiana Department of Transportation

NJTPA Region. Bergen Essex Hudson Hunterdon Jersey City Middlesex Monmouth Morris. Newark Ocean Passaic Somerset Sussex Union Warren

Highway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan. TAC August 2, 2017

The Level of Service Metric and. Alternatives for Multi-Modal Transportation. in Oakland

TRB WEBINAR PROGRAM Planning and Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide to the Highway Capacity Manual: Contents

Chapter 5 Transportation Draft

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

Appendix B2: Factors Affecting Transit Choice

Transportation Problems and Issues Excerpts from WWW Links

VISION STATEMENT, MISSION STATEMENT, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

The Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Public Meetings February 2016

Performance Measures Workshop, May 18, 2017

Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy Alternatives: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Congestion Management Process (CMP)

Chapter 5. Congestion Management Program. Chapter 5

MOBILITY AND ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

CHAPTER 5. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Transportation Goals & Objectives

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN 2017

TRANSPORTATION RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE PLAN AND COUNTY REGULATIONS VISION FOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ROAD NETWORK SECTION 7

Developing New Revenue Streams For Transit

Project Summary. Project Objectives

Chapter 5 - Transportation

Livability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update. Transportation Policy Board (TPB) August 23, 2018

Planning Group. Alternative Screening Presentations October/November Bow-Concord Interstate 93 Transportation Planning Study

2040 Addendum Performance-Based Planning November 2018

PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF THE I 76 INTEGRATED CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PROJECT TO THE CONNECTIONS 2040 PLAN FOR GREATER PHILADELPHIA

Appendix O Congestion Management Program REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

Effective Transportation Demand Management (TDM) in Congested Corridors US 422 TDM Best Practices Policy Brief and Recommendations

35 Moving Forward. O p t i m i z a t i o n P l a n E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y. Project # KA Johnson and Wyandotte Counties

Chapter 1: Overview. page 1. Figure 2-1: Road congestion is expected to continue to grow

Proposed Comprehensive Update to the State of Rhode Island s Congestion Management Process

TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM)

Minnesota s Statewide Freight System Plan and Freight Investment Plan

CHAPTER 7. TRAVEL PATTERNS AND TRAVEL FORECASTING

Moving Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Bicycle Mobility Master Plan Transit Master Plan

Bow Concord I-93 Improvements City of Concord Transportation Policy Advisory Committee

APPENDIX B - GLOSSARY FEBRUARY 2017

GUIDING PRINCIPLES MEMORANDUM

Using INRIX Data in Iowa. Kyle Barichello, Iowa DOT Skylar Knickerbocker, InTrans

SUBURBAN EDGE COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE ALL COMMUNITIES SUBURBAN EDGE

Transportation Cost Analysis:

Transportation and Utilities

INTEGRATING FREIGHT IN CORRIDOR PLANNING AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. Steve Linhart, AICP Caroline Mays, AICP

INTEGRATED MOBILITY PLAN

Joint Meeting- Stakeholder Committee & Technical Committee

Transportation Concurrency

Transportation Concurrency

2. Goals and Objectives

DES MOINES AREA MPO. Environment Roundtable. October 13, 2015

Travel Demand Model Questions

ARC Freight Advisory Task Force Meeting. SOUTH FULTON COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Multi-Modal Study

The Role of Transportation Systems Management & Operations in Supporting Livability and Sustainability

Freight transport policy and measures in Norway

Regional Transit Framework Study

EIGHT PLANNING FACTORS

Lesson 2. Principles of. Transportation. Land Use 2-1

Appendix B. OKI 2030 Regional Transportation Plan Project Scoring Process. Ohio Kentucky Indiana Regional Council of Governments

TSM/TDM (Transit and Roadway Efficiency) Concept - Analysis and Results

NATMEC June 30, 2014 Anita Vandervalk, PE, PMP

Chapter 6 Freight Plan

10.0 Congestion Management Process

State of the Practice - How Public Transportation is addressed in Traffic Impact Studies ITE Transit and Traffic Impact Studies Committee

The Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Public Meetings January 2016

TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE. January 29, 2013

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE

I-66 Corridor Improvements Outside the Capital Beltway in Northern Virginia, USA

NEED ECONOMIC TRANSPORTATION LOCATIONS EXAMPLE

State Strategies to Reduce Traffic Congestion. National Conference of State Legislatures November, 2007

Chapter #9 TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL

Chapter 2 Transportation Policy Plan Strategies

MEMORANDUM #4. DATE: November 4, Warrenton TSP Project Management Team. Ray Delahanty, AICP, DKS Associates Kate Petak, EIT, DKS Associates

2030 Transportation Policy Plan SUMMARY PRESENTATION. Land Use Advisory Committee November 15, 2012

Data Driven Results: North Carolina s Strategic Prioritization Process through SPOT On!ine. NCDOT Strategic Prioritization Office April 4, 2016

Crystal Jones. Office of Freight Management and Operations. USDOT Federal Highway Administration

Transcription:

AMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA

Introduction: North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority NJTPA Congestion Management Process Study Goals Analysis Steps (I to IV) Examples of Study Results Next Steps

STANDING COMMITTEES Planning & Economic Development Project Prioritization Freight Initiative Regional Transportation Advisory

POLICY ANALYSIS CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS MONITORING ACTION

Regional Needs Analysis The Context 1) Place Types 2) Perspectives Strategy Evaluation LOCAL ORIGIN-DESTINATION NETWORK

Embed/Apply the Products directly Regional Plans Local Concept Development Study Freight Concept Development Study Project Prioritization Criteria Refer to the Products Subregional Studies Program Planning for Emerging Centers Street Smart Campaign

Evaluate how effectively the region s transportation system serves the movement of people and goods from origins to destinations: How transportation facilities function together. How readily travelers are able to reach destinations. Suggest improvements in specific locations. Update the NJTPA s Congestion Management Process (CMP) and Regional Transportation Plan. Inform NJTPA supported studies. 7

Identify 24 key regional destinations. Criteria: Trip purposes Place Types Relevant planning study areas 8

1-3 origins for each destination 60 origin-destination pairs Primary selection factors 9

Regional performance measures: Focus Areas Reliability Time lost or gained at origin or destination budgeting for uncertain arrival times. Security of knowing that it is possible to get there from here. Transit Support It is practical and competitive to use public transportation. Transit can be integrated with other modes readily. Transit can support diverse user segments, trip purposes and needs. Route Directness Manageable time spent on transfers and distance to key connections. Efficient use of vehicle miles and in vehicle travel time. 10

Performance Categories Auto Reliability & Consistency of Conditions Transit Reliability (Access to Consistent Services) Performance Measures Auto Travel Time: Peak & Off-Peak (Ratio & Difference) Reliability Ratio: Buffer Time Index Bottleneck Congestion Locations Volume of Vehicles: Peak & Off-Peak Transit travel time: Peak & Off-Peak (Ratio & Difference) Headways: Peak & Off-Peak (Ratio & Difference) Products How consistent are auto trip travel times along specific routes. How consistent are transit trip travel times along specific routes. Transit Feasibility (Modal Redundancy) Transit to Auto Travel Time: Peak & Off-Peak (Ratio) Transit minus Auto Travel Time: Peak & Off-Peak (Difference) Transit Transfer: Peak & Off-Peak How different are auto vs. transit travel times between same origin and destination Freight Truck Intensity: Daily and Peak Peak & Off-Peak How consistent are travel times for goods movement along specific routes. Auto Route Redundancy Driving route has viable alternatives Location of emergency evacuation routes Traffic diversion routes Availability of travel route alternatives Route Directness Location of partial interchanges Differences in travel time/distance for opposite directions along a specific 11 route

Scotch Plains/Plainfield to Rockaway Auto Reliability and Consistency of Conditions Performance Measures Analysis Identified Needs for each O-D pair Transit Feasibility (Modal Redundancy)

Complimentary local performance measures Access to Regional Rail and Bus Transit Access to Freight Priority Highway Corridors Bicycle-Pedestrian Connectivity 18

Regional Needs and Observations Unpredictable travel times and bottleneck congestion Auto travel predominantly through Interstate Highways to and from urban areas and predominantly through local roads in the suburban and rural areas. Competitive and direct transit travel only to and from NYC and urban areas. Access to transit is limited 19

Recommendations for Future Consideration Intersection/Interchange improvements Transit supportive roadways Increase car share services and shuttles to train stations Studies to increase EZ pass express lanes ITS/Active Traffic Management Support TIP/RTP Project 20

Outreach to the counties to Apply the results to the county planning products Prioritize the needs and recommendations Detailed analysis of performance measures at the local level Further study to better understand the different travel movements and the associated needs and recommendations 21

Sutapa Bandyopadhyay, Principal Planner Email: sband@njtpa.org One Newark Center, 17th Floor Newark, NJ 07102 (973) 639-8400 22