THE EFFECT OF SUBSTRATE ON THE AMOUNT AND COMPOSITION OF BIOGAS IN AGRICULTURAL BIOGAS PLANT

Similar documents
Organica is a registered trademark of the Keter Group Energy Division.

Engineering & Consulting

PlanET Biogas Global GmbH

GCE Environmental Technology. Energy from Biomass. For first teaching from September 2013 For first award in Summer 2014

Energy from digester gas. Optimised biogas utilisation

Anaerobic Digestion not just biogas production. FARM BIOGAS Methane consulting cc

OPTIONS FOR REDUCTION OF MAIZE SILAGE IN BIOGAS PLANT DRAZENCI

PlanET Biogas Global GmbH

Harnessing the Energy Within 9 th April Richard Kennedy Kedco plc

Feasible Solutions for Application of the Biogas Production from the Agriculture Waste in Armenia

PlanET Biogas Global GmbH

C.J Banks, A.M. Salter and M Chesshire. 7 th International Symposium on Waste Management Problems in Agro-Industries Amsterdam th September 2006

(c) Tertiary Further treatment may be used to remove more organic matter and/or disinfect the water.

Sustainable small-scale biogas production from agrofood waste for energy self-sufficiency

Sustainable small-scale biogas production from agrofood waste for energy self-sufficiency. Live-Webinar, 12th November 2014

Manures use for energy and disposal regulations

Production from Organic Residues. Biogas

Biogas Production from Lignocellulosic Biomass

The Kindersley Centre, Berkshire November 29 th & 30 th 2006

Analysis and Processing of Kitchen waste using portable Bio-Methanation Digester

Evaluation of Agricultural Wastes for Biogas Production

Land use for agriculture

AUSTRIAN COUNTRY REPORT

Influence of nutrient composition on methane production from animal manures and co-digestion with maize and glycerine

POTENTIAL of Co-DIGESTION

PlanET Biogas Global GmbH

The Next Generation of Biofuels

Jenbacher gas engines

Key messages of chapter 3

POLAND - NATIONAL SITUATION

International Development in Biogas Utilization

Total production of agricultural products in Denmark, 1996, and in the organic scenarios (Alrøe et al. 1998a; Danish EPA 1999a)

Maryam Bakhshi AvH Climate Protection Fellow Host: Dr. Behrooz Abdolvand MONA CONSULTANTS.

Analysis of Bioenergy Potential of Agriculture

Renewable Energy Systems

IBBA Malmö Yara s Biogas Production Optimiser. Günter Doppelbauer / Sara Ekström 10 September 2015

TECHNOLOGIES FOR BIOGAS PRODUCTION IN AGRICULTURE OF LATVIA

Anaerobic digestion as a means of mitigating CH 4 emissions in agriculture

UNIT 5. Biomass energy

Bioenergy Policy and Agricultural Development

UMWEKO GmbH, Dr Konrad Schleiss

Biomass. The latter is not a new concept, homes and industries were, at one time, heated and powered by wood.

Energetic use of biomass in the city of Hamburg

Becky Larson Assistant Professor and Extension Specialist Biological Systems Engineering November 24, 2015

YOUR WASTEI OUR RESOURCE. OUR TECHNOLOGYI YOUR ENERGY.

TITLE PAGE. from Dairy Manure and Mortality Digester. Keith Henn, Jeff Coombe, John Martin Jr., and Jennifer Purcell

Grass/Cattle Manure as feedstock for AD plants

Agriculture and Food Industry

REALIZING RENEWABLE ENERGY POTENTIAL

DIGESTING FIBRUOUS MATERIALS AND WASTE IN MULTI STAGE BIOGAS PLANTS

Biogas Production from Lignocellulosic Biomass

BIOGAS PRODUCING TECHNOLOGIES IN LATVIA

Training on Biogas and Biomethane Production

Aerobic and Anaerobic Biodegradation

PROSPECTS FOR THE USE OF AGRICULTURAL RESIDUES FOR ENERGY PRODUCTION IN UKRAINE

Climate smart cattle farming management and systems aspects

Animal Waste based Biogas Potential in Turkey

DETERMINATION OF THE POTENTIAL BIOGAS ENERGY PRODUCTION AMOUNTS AND AREAS IN THE TIGRIS BASIN USING GIS

Optimizing anaerobic digestion of agricultural substrates

Waste to energy conversion Dr. Prasenjit Mondal Department of Chemical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee

Vermont Tech Community Anaerobic Digester! Harvesting renewable energy & recycling nutrients for a more sustainable community

Current state of biogas production in Poland

Sustainable Biogas Market Central and Eastern Europe

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION. Marco Poliafico WINACC

Biorefineries for Eco-efficient Processing of Biomass Classification and Assessment of Biorefinery Systems

ASTARTA. Energy efficiency and bioenergy opportunities

Municipal Organic Solid Waste as an Alternative Urban Bioenergy Source

CHAPTER 4 SUGARCANE ITS BYPRODUCTS AND CO-PRODUCTS, OPPORTUNITIES FOR DIVERSIFICATION: AN OVERVIEW

Highlights of socio-economic impacts from biogas in 28 target regions

Aerobic and Anaerobic Biodegradation. Danny Clark ENSO Bottles LLC 06/29/2010

Driven by pure energy. Understanding the Important Factors of Anaerobic Digestion ABC Workshop - May 27,

Biogas from waste materials as transportation fuel benefits from an environmental point of view

Biogas. economically, ecologically, guaranteed for the future

Waste to Energy & Anaerobic Digestion APCE Sept 16, 2014

What is manure worth?

Anaerobic Digestion of Biomass Waste : A Comprehensive Review

Manures and Farm Resources

Sustainable Growing of Maize for Biogas Production

Biogas Energy Potential in Alberta

Addressing Measurement Challenges in Biogas

Introduction into Digester Biology

Basis Data Questionnaire - biogas plant

Aus dem Institut für Betriebswirtschaft, Agrarstruktur und ländliche Räume

Soil Food & Biofuels Is this sustainable?

SITUATION OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS IN LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION LA VAN KINH INSTITUTE OF ANIMAL SCIENCES FOR SOUTHERN VIETNAM

METHANE PRODUCTION FROM STILLAGE

Anaerobic Digestion (AD)

Livestock and Climate Change in South Asia. Carolyn Opio 26 August 2008 Dhaka

The German Energy Transition and Biogas: Technologies, market development and project examples. Markus Fuerst 20/03/2018 Jakarta

Sugar Industry Restructuring by Implementing Biorefinery Technology

Class XII Chapter 10 Microbes in Human Welfare Biology

Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%)

Introduction into Digester Biology

Biogas A Wet Gas Environment for Thermal Flow Meters

BUSINESS PROSPECT - BIOGAS PLANTS IN DENMARK

RESOURCES, OPPORTUNITIES AND IMPACTS FOR BIOENERGY DEVELOPMENT

Global Warming. Department of Chemical Engineering

Biomass Energy Slide Index Slide 2: Biomass Energy: What is Biomass? Slide 3: Biomass Energy: Resources Primary biomass Secondary biomass

Options for integrating principles & criteria of sustainable bioenergy production and use into policy

Research & Development Support in the Field of Biogas Production and Utilization

Transcription:

INFRASTRUKTURA I EKOLOGIA TERENÓW WIEJSKICH INFRASTRUCTURE AND ECOLOGY OF RURAL AREAS Nr III/2/2015, POLSKA AKADEMIA NAUK, Oddział w Krakowie, s. 809 818 Komisja Technicznej Infrastruktury Wsi DOI: http://dx.medra.org/10.14597/infraeco.2015.3.2.065 THE EFFECT OF SUBSTRATE ON THE AMOUNT AND COMPOSITION OF BIOGAS IN AGRICULTURAL BIOGAS PLANT Joanna Kazimierowicz Bialystok University of Technology Summary Construction of biogas plants processing agricultural waste enables to reduce waste, limit emission of gases and odors in rural areas as well as gives the possibility to ensure self-sufficiency of energy. The amount of generated electricity and heat depends on the quantity and quality of biogas. The aim of this work was to show how the substrate affects the amount and composition of the biogas in agricultural biogas plants. The most commonly applied types of substrates in agricultural biogas plants in 2011-2012 and in the first half of 2013 were indicated due to the Agricultural Market Agency data. The research also showed the amount of agricultural biogas produced as well as the amount of electricity and heat generated from agricultural biogas during the time period mentioned above. Key words: biogas, alternative energy, agricultural biogas plant, substrates INTRODUCTION The obligation of EU countries to obtain energy from unconventional sources has created a situation in which a food producer may become an important energy producer. The effects of deliberate strategy, which provides the economy and farmers involved in the production of electricity with benefits, are observed in the Western countries. To fulfill the commitment Poland needs to introduce cultivation of energy crops together with the maximum use 809

Joanna Kazimierowicz of agricultural and food industry waste (Eder B., Schulz H. 2007; Pilarski K., Adamski M. 2009) Agricultural biogas plants are becoming more popular among agricultural producers mainly due to easy access to information about the agricultural uses of biogas plants, pressure from suppliers, changes in energy law and the need for proper utilization of manure and slurry. Biogas plant is also an excellent source of income diversification owing to rising production costs and decreasing profitability of crops and livestock production (Gniazdowski J. 2009). To produce biogas, more commonly are used materials which differ from traditional natural fertilizers manure and slurry, municipal waste and sewage sludge. For example, corn intended for the production of biogas enables to produce around ten times greater amount of methane than slurry (Eder B., Schulz H. 2007). The effectiveness of methane production from arable crops depends not only on their species but also upon other cultivation factors, such as dry matter content, plant maturity or harvest date (Amon T., Kryvoruchko V., Bodiroza V., Amon B. 2005). These factors depend on climate, soil factors and region (regional diversity of crops). AGRICULTURAL BIOGAS PLANT PRINCIPLE OF OPERATION Agricultural biogas plants are used for the production of biogas whose main component is methane. The starting materials are dosed to the fermentation chamber. Here the biomass is mixed, which allows to distribute evenly next portions of substrate and to maintain proper parameters, including ph and the temperature. The fermented substrate is used as a liquid fertilizer. Produced biogas is stored in a tank, dried and after being disposed of hydrogen sulfide it is received by the CHP aggregate or module (http://biogazownie.pl/fermentacja-metanowa. html). As a consequence, electricity and heat are created.. Cycle of anaerobic biochemical reactions occurring in fermentation chambers is composed of four stages, such as (Dudek J., Zaleska-Bartosz J. 2010): hydrolysis polymers: hydrocarbons, fats and proteins are decomposed to monomers: sugars, glycerine, amino acids, fatty acids, acidogenesis monomers are converted to short-chain fatty acids, alcohols, hydrogen, carbon dioxide and methane, acetogenesis fatty acids are converted to acetic acid, hydrogen and carbon dioxide, methanogenesis from acetic acid and hydrogen arises a mixture of methane and carbon dioxide, the final product. Depending on the starting materials and the process conditions, the composition of biogas can vary considerably. Table 1 shows the chemical composition of biogas (Steppa M. 1988). Proper preparation of the substrate has a significant 810

The effect of... impact on the speed of the process of biological waste treatment as well as on the composition of the biogas. Table 1. The chemical composition of biogas from agricultural biogas plant Component of biogas Concentration [%] CH 4 52 85 CO 2 14 48 H 2 S 0.08 5.5 H 2 0 5.5 CO 0 2.1 N 2 0.6 7.5 O 2 0 1.0 Source: (Steppa M. 1988) ADVANTAGES OF AGRICULTURAL BIOGAS PLANT Biogas plants which are based on waste from animal husbandry, slaughterhouse waste, distilleries or meat processing plants allow to obtain biogas which is renewable energy carrier as well as fermented mass, i.e. useful technological waste, bacteriologically safe. Such use of waste is considered appropriate mainly for liquid waste from animal husbandry. Biochemical transformation of farmed waste has other benefits, namely: minimized emissions of odorous substances and methane. Emission of these substances occurs during collecting and storing waste from animal husbandry for a required period before using them to fertilize and during this process (Marczak H. 2009). Reduction of odors is greater than 80%. Also fertilizing conditions of cultivated fields are improved, compared with unfermented liquid manure. Disinfection process eliminates pathogens. Functioning of agricultural biogas plant reduces the risk of groundwater and surface water contamination. An important advantage is the reduction in fossil fuels consumption and compounds emission produced during their combustion. The use of meadows and pastures for purposes other than feeding, including the energy purposes, can also bring many benefits, such as (Wasilewski Z., Barszczewski J. 2011): quantitative and qualitative enrichment of plant material intended for the use in biogas plants, in particular in combination with the liquid manure; using meadows and pastures abandoned due to disposing of ruminants such grounds erode and lose their valuable functions, particularly non-productive ones; 811

Joanna Kazimierowicz maintaining or even improving precious value of the rural landscape; maintaining or even increasing a biodiversity. Produced biogas can be sold as a fuel or used in facilities which are adjacent to the biogas plant for the production of (Marczak H. 2009): heat; electricity and heat: in the cogeneration system using gas engines, in the system using a steam (steam turbines); electricity (spark engines). MATERIALS AND METHODS Data used came from the Agricultural Market Agency and concerned the amount of agricultural biogas produced as well as the amount of electricity and heat produced from agricultural biogas. Data from professional literature allowed to indicate substrates that generate the biggest quantities of biogas and substrates that generate the most methane-rich biogas. Table 2. List of raw materials used to produce agricultural biogas in 2011-2012 and in the first half of 2013 (as on 30 th September 2013) Type of raw material used to produce agricultural biogas The amount of raw materials consumed in the production of agricultural biogas (in tonnes) 2011 2012 First half of 2013 liquid manure 265 960.79 349 173.12 212 465.43 corn silage 108 876.14 241 590.19 145 485.53 decoction of the distillery 30 465.11 146 607.49 162 427.51 manure 11 640.53 23 502.98 17 020.66 residues from fruit and vegetables 10 984.35 86 109.22 15 939.54 a mixture of lecithin and soaps 8 906.87 2 086.42 0 potato pulp 7 258.49 6 627.27 1 463.14 grass silage 7 217.10 1 683.17 622.44 pulp 6 922.45 37 081.80 45 447.62 cereal silage 5 973.80 348.48 485.52 whey 1 933.00 12 854.34 6 883.00 cereal 1 611.77 690.78 240.45 stomach contents 1 278.30 1 056.62 0 fatty waste 285.65 305.17 0 812

Type of raw material used to produce agricultural biogas The effect of... The amount of raw materials consumed in the production of agricultural biogas (in tonnes) 2011 2012 First half of 2013 flour, bread and breadcrumbs 101.71 450.4 0 protein deposits 0 1 020.08 0 fodder 0 1 951.94 0 liquid leftover wheat 0 864.79 706.49 slaughterhouse waste 0 663.19 3 411.20 sludges from refined rapeseed oil 0 620.54 0 sludges protein-fatty 0 408.65 0 washings chocolate 0 342.52 0 glycerine 0 302.71 2 578.76 Waste plant- 0 292.98 0 sediment of yeast 0 230.08 1 060.40 straw 0 153.45 603.65 residues from the processing of plant products 0 50.06 0 overdue food 0 36.54 0 fats 0 15.5 0 plant oils 0 1.08 0 liquid waste from potato processing 0 0 123 920.60 waste protein-fatty 0 0 3 388.98 hens manure 0 0 2 128.86 waste chocolate 0 0 1 253.56 waste from food processing 0 0 505.39 wastes from the production of plant oil 0 0 190.77 fusel oils 0 0 87.38 protein hydrolyzate 0 0 39.62 Source: Agricultural Market Agency fodder 0 0 2.3 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS Table 2 shows the raw materials used in the production of agricultural biogas during the analyzed period. Table 3 shows the possibilities of biogas and methane yield from each substrate, Figures 1 and 2 respectively illustrate it graphically. In Table 4 production of agricultural biogas, electricity and heat 813

Joanna Kazimierowicz from agricultural biogas in 2011-2012 and in the first half of 2013 is shown. Figure 3 shows production of agricultural biogas, whereas Figure 4 electricity and heat from agricultural biogas in years 2011-2012 and in the first half of 2013. In the analyzed period the dominant substrates were: slurry, corn silage, decoction of the distillery. The share of the residue of fruit and vegetables increased significantly in 2012, while in the first half of 2013 there was a high share of liquid waste from potato processing. It may be indicated that suitable substrates for biogas plant, in order to achieve its optimal work, are still being searched. New materials are being used and there is a shift from the ones which have not worked in agricultural biogas plants. Table 3. Characteristics of selected plants and selected products for biogas yield Base The dry matter content (%) The dry matter content of organic (%) Natural fertilizers The yield of biogas (m 3 /t) The content of methane CH 4 (% vol.) cattle slurry 8-11 75-82 200-500 60 pigs slurry about 7 75-86 300-700 60-70 cattle manure about 25 68-76 210-300 60 pigs manure 20-25 75-80 270-450 60 hens manure about 32 63-80 250-450 60 Plants maize silage 20-35 85-95 450-700 50-55 rye 30-35 92-98 550-680 about 55 grass silage 25-50 70-95 550-620 54-55 Products of the agricultural industry brewers grains 20-25 70-80 580-750 59-60 grain decoction 6-8 83-88 430-700 58-65 potato decoction 6-7 85-95 400-700 58-65 pomace 25-45 90-95 590-660 65-70 Other substrates for biogas plants waste fittings 5-20 80-90 400-600 60-65 gastric contents 12-15 75-86 250-450 60-70 Grasses mown grass about 12 83-92 550-680 55-65 Source: Land Technik Weiher Stephen H.Mitterleitner (Latocha 2010) 814

The effect of... Source: Own calculations based on (Latocha 2010) Figure 1. Biogas production from selected plants and by-products Source: Own calculations based on (Latocha 2010) Figure 2. The volume of methane in the biogas obtained from selected plants and by-products 815

Joanna Kazimierowicz Source: Own calculations based on data Agricultural Market Agency Figure 3. Agricultural biogas in 2011-2012 and first half of 2013 Source: Own calculations based on data Agricultural Market Agency Figure 4. Electrical energy and heat production from agricultural biogas in 2011-2012 and first half of 2013 816

The effect of... Maize silage, rye, grass silage, brewers grains, pomace, mown grass can provide a large amount of biogas. Grain decoction, potato decoction, pomace, gastric contents can provide biogas with the highest methane amount. Table 4. Production of agricultural biogas, electricity and heat from agricultural biogas in 2011-2012 and in the first half of 2013 (as on 30 th September 2013) Unit 2011 2012 first half of 2013 The amount agricultural biogas produced mln m 3 36,65 73,15 52,53 The amount of electricity generated from agricultural biogas The amount of heat produced from agricultural biogas Source: Agricultural Market Agency GWh 73,43 141,80 106,80 GWh 82,63 160,13 121,54 In 2012, compared to 2011, increased the amount of biogas produced as well as electricity and heat generated from it. Prospects for growth in 2013 are enormous, as indicated by semi-annual survey. CONCLUSIONS 1. The amount and composition of produced biogas is highly dependent on the composition of the raw mix undergoing the process of fermentation. 2. Due to the possibility inhibitory effect of substrates on the fermentation process, new substrates should be thoroughly tested for performance and usability. 3. Every year the amount of biogas plants in Poland increases, and consequently - also the amount of electricity and heat from agricultural biogas. 4. Searching for new starting materials and resignation from inefficient ones enables optimal solutions of methane fermentation. This article has been written within the work S/WBiIŚ/2/2014 and MB/WBiIŚ/5/2015 REFERENCES Amon T., Kryvoruchko V., Bodiroza V., Amon B. (2005). Methanerzeugung aus Getreide, Wiesengras und Sonnenblumen. Einfluss des Erntezeitpunktes und der Vorbehandlung. In: 7.Tagung: Bau, Technik und Umwelt in der landwirtschaftlichen 817

Joanna Kazimierowicz Nutztierhaltung. Herausgeber: Kuratorium für Technik und Bauwesen in der Landwirtschaft e.v. (Ed.):343-348 Biogas Polish: How does a biogas plant operate [online]. Access 21.02.2014: http:// biogazownie.pl/fermentacja-metanowa.html Bios Bioenergiesysteme GmbH [online]. Access 21.02.2014: http://www.bios-bioenergy. at/en/references/all-projects/bad-tatzmannsdorf.html Dudek J., Zaleska-Bartosz J. (2010). Production and use of biogas for energy purposes. Problems of Ecology, Vol 14, No. 1 Eder B., Schulz H. (2007). Biogas Praxis. Okobuch Magnum. Freiburg. Gniazdowski J. (2009). Performance evaluation of biogas for a planned biogas plant on a dairy farm. Problems of Agricultural Engineering No. 3 Latocha L.: Materials from the training Renewable energy sources for home and business, 2010. Marczak H. (2009). The aspects of energetic use of biogas made from waste in Lublin voievodship. Ecological Engineering No. 21 Pilarski K., Adamski M. (2009). Perspectives of biogas production with taking into consideration reaction mechanism in the range of quantitative and qualitative analyses of fermentation processes. Journal of Research and Application in Agriculture Engineering, vol. 54 (2): 81-86. Steppa M. (1988). Agricultural biogas plants IBMER, Warsaw. Wasilewski Z., Barszczewski J. (2011). State of the permanent grasslands and possibilities of their use to biogas production. Problems of Agricultural Engineering No. 2 Received: 15.11.2014 Accepted: 08.06.2015 Mgr inż. Joanna Kazimierowicz Bialystok University of Technology Department of Environmental Engineering Systems ul. Wiejska 45A 15-351 Bialystok j.kazimierowicz@pb.edu.pl