EXPLOSIVE CAPACITY DETERMINATION SYSTEM. The following provides the Guidelines for Use of the QDARC Program for the PC.

Similar documents
AMMUNITION STORAGE ANALYSIS MODEL. determining magazine requirements. The Ammunition Storage Analysis Model is a series of

STORAGE OF LIMITED QUANTITIES OF EXPLOSIVES AT REDUCED Q-D

Earned Value Management on Firm Fixed Price Contracts: The DoD Perspective

GUIDE FOR EVALUATING BLAST RESISTANCE OF EXISTING UNDEFINED ARCH-TYPE EARTH-COVERED MAGAZINES

Robustness of Communication Networks in Complex Environments - A simulations using agent-based modelling

Biased Cramer-Rao lower bound calculations for inequality-constrained estimators (Preprint)

Issues for Future Systems Costing

Tactical Equipment Maintenance Facilities (TEMF) Update To The Industry Workshop

ITEA LVC Special Session on W&A

Joint JAA/EUROCONTROL Task- Force on UAVs

Diminishing Returns and Policy Options in a Rentier State: Economic Reform and Regime Legitimacy in Saudi Arabia

Improvements to Hazardous Materials Audit Program Prove Effective

Army Quality Assurance & Administration of Strategically Sourced Services

DDESB TP13 Software Update 2010 DDESB Seminar 15 July, 2010

CORROSION CONTROL Anniston Army Depot

Computer Aided Explosives Facility Site Planning and Analysis

Panel 5 - Open Architecture, Open Business Models and Collaboration for Acquisition

US Naval Open Systems Architecture Strategy

COMPUTER ENHANCEMENTS FOR DETERMINING EXPLOSIVE FRAGMENTATION Q-D

AUTOMATED EXPLOSION EFFECTS MODELING. Phillip C. Wager and Frank R. Johnson, Jr. Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center, NFESC

FEASIBILITY OF USING NON PROPAGATION WALLS IN AN EXISTING OPERATING FACILITY. And

NOGAPS/NAVGEM Platform Support

SE Tools Overview & Advanced Systems Engineering Lab (ASEL)

Defense Business Board

Ranked Set Sampling: a combination of statistics & expert judgment

PL and Payment of CWA Stormwater Fees

11. KEYNOTE 2 : Rebuilding the Tower of Babel Better Communication with Standards

RFID and Hazardous Waste Implementation Highlights

Trends in Acquisition Workforce. Mr. Jeffrey P. Parsons Executive Director Army Contracting Command

Developing a More Complete Set of DMSMS Solutions

Flexible Photovoltaics: An Update

Kelly Black Neptune & Company, Inc.

Success with the DoD Mentor Protégé Program

SEDD Our Vision. Anand Mudambi. Joseph Solsky USACE USEPA 3/31/2011 1

Agenda. Current Acquisition Environment-Strategic Sourcing. Types of Contract Vehicles. Specific Contract Vehicles for Navy-wide Use DOD EMALL

INVASIVE SPECIES IMPACT ON THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

THE NATIONAL SHIPBUILDING RESEARCH PROGRAM

1 ISM Document and Training Roadmap. Challenges/ Opportunities. Principles. Systematic Planning. Statistical Design. Field.

Bio-Response Operational Testing & Evaluation (BOTE) Project

Future Capabilities of GenCade Ashley Frey

ROCK STRIKE TESTING OF TRANSPARENT ARMOR NLE-01

DoD Solid Waste Diversion

Addressing Species at Risk Before Listing - MCB Camp Lejeune and Coastal Goldenrod

Emission Guide Update for Mobile and Stationary Sources at Air Force Installations

Implementation of the Best in Class Project Management and Contract Management Initiative at the U.S. Department of Energy s Office of Environmental

Aerodynamic Aerosol Concentrators

DESIGN PRINCIPLES, REQUIREMENTS, AND SAFETY ASSESSMENT FOR THE SAFE DISPOSITION OF MUNITIONS (An Overview of STANAG 4518)

Fort Belvoir Compliance-Focused EMS. E2S2 Symposium Session June 16, 2010

AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY RESEARCH ON AUTONOMOUS AND NON- DESTRUCTIVE PAVEMENT SURFACE ASSESSMENT

NEC2 Effectiveness and Agility: Analysis Methodology, Metrics, and Experimental Results*

STANDARDIZATION DOCUMENTS

Charting the Way Forward to Cadmium and Hexavalent Chromium Free Connectors: NAVSEA Usage and Testing

Improving Energy Efficiency at the Watervliet Arsenal

Report No. D August 1, Internal Controls Over U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Civil Works, Disbursement Processes

NDCEE. Landscape Modeling Technologies for Sustainable Forests. National Defense Center for Energy and Environment. Ms. Donna S.

Climate Change Adaptation: U.S. Navy Actions in the Face of Uncertainty

AF Future Logistics Concepts

Alex G. Manganaris Director, Workforce Plans and Resources

309th Commodities Group

James P. Manthey Corps of Engineers, Huntsville Division

Exploring DDESB Acceptance Criteria for Containment of Small Charge Weights

Propane as a Surrogate for Kerosene in Fuel Fire Tests

Augmenting Task-Centered Design With Operator State Assessment Technologies

DESCRIPTIONS OF HYDROGEN-OXYGEN CHEMICAL KINETICS FOR CHEMICAL PROPULSION

DISTRIBUTION A: APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED

An Open Strategy for the Acquisition of Models and Simulations. Rudolph P. Darken Director, MOVES Institute

The Nuts and Bolts of Zinc-Nickel

Water Sustainability & Conservation in an Exhaust Cooling Discharge System Case Study

Field Demonstration of Alternative Coatings for High Strength Steel (HSS)

Matching Navy Recruiting Needs with Social Network Profiles Using

(10) Patent No.: US 7,691,731 B / A1 * 5/2005 Sato et al / / A1 * 6/2006 Fujii eta! /499 (57) ABSTRACT

Joint Expeditionary Collective Protection (JECP) Family of Systems (FoS)

22 nd Annual Systems & Software Technology Conference. Salt Lake City, Utah April 2010

DETONATION TRAP STUDIES

Aircraft Enroute Command and Control Comms Redesign Mechanical Documentation

A Quality Control Procedure Specialized for Incremental Sampling

Ultraviolet (UV) Curable Coatings DoD Executive for Bullet Agent Tip Identification

Two Approaches to Rehabilitation of Metal Roofing at Wheeler Army Airfield Hawaii

Supply Chain Modeling: Downstream Risk Assessment Methodology (DRAM)

Applying Software Architecture Principles in a DoD Acquisition

Geothermal Energy Demonstration at Fort Indiantown Gap

USMC Environmental and Corrosion Control Issues. Andrew Sheetz USMC CPAC Engineering Manager

Satisfying DoD Contract Reporting With Agile Artifacts

Earned Value Management from a Behavioral Perspective ARMY

Reliability and Maintainability (R&M) Engineering Update

Operational Use of Explosives Hazard Analysis and Site Planning Software. Ray W. Tidwell George E. Stratman

Performance of FRP Connectors for Seismic Rehab of Michie Stadium

73rd MORSS CD Cover Page UNCLASSIFIED DISCLOSURE FORM CD Presentation

Department of Defense Green Procurement Program and Biobased Products

Some Human Factors Design Principles for Effective Visualization and Collaboration of Military Operations

Baleen Whale Calls and Seasonal Ocean Ambient Noise

Hazards Produced by Explosions Inside Earth-Covered Igloos

Application of the HEC-5 Hydropower Routines

Performance-Based Acquisitions (PBA) E2S2 Conference April 2011

Oversight Review January 27, Quality Control Review of Army Audit Agency's Special Access Program Audits. Report No.

AUTOCLAVE MELTOUT OF CAST EXPLOSIVES

Microstructural effects and kinetics of high temperature oxidation in Nb-Si base alloys

Contemporary Issue Sense and Respond Logistics Now Submitted by: Captain B.K. Sanchez CG #12, FACAD: Major B.J. Nownes 8 February 2005

Traditional Project. Can t We All Get Along

Quality Control Review of Air Force Audit Agency s Special Access Program Audits (Report No. D )

Transcription:

EXPLOSIVE CAPACITY DETERMINATION SYSTEM Since the inception of explosive constrained storage structures, the determination of the individual structures' capacities has been one of much labor intensive table look-ups and individual technical interpretation, and sometimes command interpretation. In an attempt to simplify and automate, a computer system, which is a number of different computer subroutines, was developed for internal use and is being shown here. This program can help and assist all station explosives safety officers in reviewing all facility site approvals that involve facilities encumbered by or generating ESQD arcs to ensure that they comply with existing safety directions. The computer system will, when provided all answers to a list of input questions about the distances to defined targets and building orientation, provide the structures' net explosive weight constraints for each hazard class and division along with maintaining a record of this in a data base file. The system is connected/correlated to the sections, tables and figures of the Navy's Safety Regulations for Handling, Storing, Production, Renovation and Shipping, Ammunition and Explosives (NAVSEA OP-5), but should be applicable to any and all services' requirements. The following provides the Guidelines for Use of the QDARC Program for the PC.

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE AUG 1998 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-1998 to 00-00-1998 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Explosive Capacity Determination System 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Naval Surface Warfare Center,Code 4026,300 Hwy 361,Crane,IN,47522-5001 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES See also ADM001002. Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth DoD Explosives Safety Seminar Held in Orlando, FL on 18-20 August 1998. 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 9 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

GUIDELINES FOR USE OF QDARC PROGRAM All screens are simple to follow and events may be selected or entered by use of a mouse or through movement by arrow keys. Prompts at the end of each screen provide for continuation, exit or other prompt. The user may select or enter data applicable to a single magazine by selecting <single> at the bottom of screen 1 or may print a complete summary of all magazines listed on the data disk by selecting <all>. At the C> prompt place the disk in drive A or B as appropriate. Type A (or B):"install" This will create a directory C:\qdarc on the C drive and enable the drive containing the disk to accept magazine data. Type "qdarc" and press enter. This starts the screen entry process. Screen 1 Date and UIC fields are mandatory entries. Building measurement fields left blank as not applicable will default to the maximum allowable (design limit) net explosive weight. Magazine measurement data fields should be filled with "999999" if not an applicable entry. 1. Date - select date as furnished by the computer clock or correct the entry as necessary. 2. UIC - enter the station unit identification code. 3. Data drive - select the drive which contains the floppy disk. 4. Select <new> or <existing> to select whether data applies to a new magazine or is for revision to an existing magazine which is on the disk file. 5. Enter magazine number of the magazine (or if existing, select the magazine number from those displayed by pop-up screen). 6. Select <single> to continue with single magazine calculations. NOTE: Selection of <all mags> will print summary data entries for all magazines contained on the disk file under this UIC. NOTE: All references to a "magazine" should be divided into the following descriptions: Host magazine is defined as the magazine being evaluated for establishment of Net Explosive Weight (NEW) limits to be set. Target magazine - is defined as a magazine being considered as a Potential Explosive Site (PES) if within range of the host magazine. 7. Enter (or verify) dimensions - Length x Width x Height in feet.

8. Select magazine type as applicable (igloo/box/etc). 9. Select type of magazine access as applicable (truck/rail/both). 10. Select magazine characteristics as appropriate. These entries include whether the magazine is standard, barricaded or earth-covered. Screen 2 11. Enter/verify maximum design limit Net Explosive Weight (NEW) as applicable for the magazine. These are contained in OP-5, Vol 1, Appendix C. 12. Enter distance to nearest inhabited building (in feet). 13. Enter building number of the inhabited building. 14. Enter description of the inhabited building. 15. Enter orientation of the inhabited building relative to the magazine as to whether it is to the front, side or rear of the host magazine. 16. Enter the distance to the nearest operations building (in feet). 17. Enter the building number of the operations building. 18. Enter the description of the operations building. 19. Enter the orientation of the operations building as to whether it is to the front, side or rear of the magazine. 20. Select barricaded or unbarricaded as appropriate for the operations building. 21. Enter distance to nearest public transportation route (in feet). 22. Enter description of the public transportation route. 23. Enter orientation of the public transportation route as to whether it is to the front, side or rear of the host magazine. 24. Enter distance to nearest airfield runway (in feet). 25. Select whether it is a DoD or non-dod runway.

Screen 3 26. Enter magazine number of the nearest earth covered magazine. (This will be designated as a target magazine) 27. Select whether it is a standard or non-standard magazine. 28. Select whether it is barricaded or unbarricaded. 29. Enter distance in feet to the target magazine. 30. Enter orientation of that magazine as to whether it is to the front, side or rear of the host magazine. 31. Enter orientation of the host magazine as to whether it is to the front, side or rear of the target magazine. 32. Enter the magazine number of the nearest above ground magazine. (This will be designated as a target magazine) 33. Select whether it is barricaded or unbarricaded. 34. Enter distance in feet to the target magazine. 35. Enter orientation of that magazine as to whether it is to the front, side, or rear of the host magazine. 36. Enter orientation of the host magazine relative to the target magazine, e.g. host magazine is to the front, side or rear of the target magazine. Note: When 2 earth covered magazines are sited so that one is in the forward sector of the other, a pop-up screen will appear requiring reference to the following for entry of a column number based on the orientation. (1) If, as shown in figure 7-1(a) and (b), the headwalls of magazines X and Y are outside the 120-degree sector, and therefore more than 60 degrees to either side of the centerline, they may be separated by the 1.25W 1/3 distances shown in column 3, calculated using the large quantity of Class/Division 1.1 stored in either. This is the equivalent of the standard magazine separation distance for igloos all facing the same direction with axes parallel. (2) If, as shown in figure 7-1(c), the headwall of X is outside the 120-degree sector of Y, but the headwall of Y is inside the 120-degree sector of X, the separation distance between these two igloos is determined by D=2.75W 1/3 as shown in column 5 based on the largest quantity of Class/Division 1.1 material in either igloo. For existing igloos originally cited at distances shown in column 3, this could result in an unnecessary limit on the contents of X.

(3) When the explosive quantities are comparable in X and Y, it is the exposure of igloo X to an explosion in Y that necessitates application of the 2.75W 1/3 distances shown in column 5. If the quantity in Y were reduced to less than one-tenth of that in X, or if the storage in Y is not Class/Division 1.1, the quantities in igloo X would control. The Q-D requirement shall then be taken from column 3 or 1.25W 1/3, and applied to the quantity in X. That is, the quantity in X would not need to be reduced. Therefore, basing the explosive limit in X upon column 3 is not considered a deviation from the standard and does not require a waiver or exemption. (4) If, as shown in figure 7-1(d), headwalls of X and Y are within the 120-degree sector of each other and are not provided with a separate door barricade, distances of D=11W 1/3 shown in column 11, shall be used. If one or more separate door barricades are present that meet requirements for barricades, then the 6W 1/3 distance shown in column 9 may be used to determine separation distances. (5) Although in figure 7-1(c) no separate barricade is shown between X and Y, a more detailed analysis of a specific storage condition of this type might show that the distribution of explosives within X and Y is such that the earth fill of one or both meets the specifications of an effective barricade. In this case, the 6W 1/3 distance shown in column 9 would apply. (6) If, as shown in figure 7-1(e) and (f), igloos X and Y are either of a significantly different length of "canted" so that one of them is within the 120-degree sector off the headwall of the other, even though a straight line between headwall X and igloo Y passes through the earth cover of Y, the limit for X when X is the PES, would be based upon 1.25W 1/3 shown in column 3. If Y is the PES, however, the limit for Y would be determined by 2.75W 1/3 shown in column 5. Igloo Y may be used to its physical capacity for hazard divisions other than 1.1.

Figure 7-1. Quantity-Distance Requirements Based on Magazine Siting (1 of 3)

Figure 7-1. Quantity-Distance Requirements Based on Magazine Siting (2 of 3)

Figure 7-1. Quantity-Distance Requirements Based on Magazine Siting (3 of 3)

Select <view> to display the completed form on the screen. Select <print> to print the completed form. Select <save> to save and store the results on the floppy disk Select <exit> which returns the user to screen 1 from which you may continue with another magazine, print an all magazine summary or exit the program. You may use any or all of these functions as selected.