Bullitt Center s Energy Performance

Similar documents
Technical Reference. Portfolio Manager ENERGY STAR. Parking and the ENERGY STAR Score in the United States and Canada OVERVIEW

Getting to Net Zero. PV and the Electrical Grid The Bullitt Center. September 17, PRESENTED TO: NASEO Getting to Net Zero National Forum

N/A. ENERGY STAR Data Verification Checklist. Circle Star Plaza. 1. Review of Whole Property Characteristics. Property & Contact Information

Parking and the ENERGY STAR Score in the United States and Canada

CSU LONG BEACH COLLEGE OF CONTINUING AND PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION

Energy Efficiency in Multi-Tenant Office Buildings

Ocean Discovery Institute: Designing for Zero Net Energy

High Performance, Energy Efficient Design for Wood Frame Buildings

DISCOVERIES AT NET ZERO. Michael Leckman Diamond Schmitt Architects Chris Piche Integral Group

Carbon Neutral 60% 70% 80% 90% Today

White Paper ENVELOPE-FIRST APPROACH TO NET-ZERO ENERGY BUILDINGS

Going Deep on Plug Loads: Strategies from the Bullitt Center 12 th Annual Energy/Facilities Connections (EFC) Conference 4 May 2016 Leavenworth, WA

How Rigorous Planning and Effective Design Help Hit Ultra Low Energy Goals

CLARK BROCKMAN, SERA ARCHITECTS

Building Energy Analysis for a Multi-Family Residential Building (Multi V III VRF Heat-Pump System)

SAMPLE ZNE PRESENTATION

University of Minnesota Duluth Civil Engineering Building

Alpen Windows - LEED Impact Analysis

Passive Design Solutions. Passive House The Road to Net-Zero

ENSURING A PRODUCTIVE ENERGY MODELING PROCESS

HIGH POINT NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER ENERGY MODELING REPORT CONTENTS. Goals 2. Method 2. Acknowledgements 3. Challenges and Standards 3. equest Results 4-13

Appendix Energy Guidelines Deliverable Requirements

MID-RISE APARTMENT BUILDING PROTOTYPE HIGH PERFORMANCE PV Genera on Poten al 10.8 kbtu/ 2/yr

BETA OPTION 1: PERFORMANCE RATING METHOD. Section General Information

Benchmarking EPA Portfolio Manager and Energy Star Certification

OSU Cascades Net Zero Campus. Recommendations

AIA+2030 Professional Series Overview + Learning Objectives

Level II - Whole Building Interval Electric Data with Tenant Plug Load System

The Elithis Tower is an experimental and demonstration. Elithis Tower in Dijon, France. nzeb case studies

and LEED Energy and Atmosphere Credits Jean Ascoli, LEED AP BD+C Architect, Energy Specialist

= Verified Zero Net Energy Building Case Study BAGATELOS ARCHITECTURAL GLASS SYSTEMS MANUFACTURING FACILITY OVERVIEW

Building Energy Efficiency Analysis for a High School

how to read an energy model

Building Energy Efficiency Analysis for a High School

The Creative and Performing Arts High School (CAPA) Pittsburgh, PA 9/30/2002 Andrew Tech Mechanical Option Prof. S. A. Mumma

Compliance to the IgCC. September 29, 2011

LOW-RISE APARTMENT BUILDING PROTOTYPE HIGH PERFORMANCE PV Genera on Poten al 17.9 kbtu/ 2/yr

Be Aggressive About the Passive Solutions

Finn Hill Middle School

OPTION 1: PERFORMANCE RATING METHOD

California Department of Public Health

Multifamily Passive House: Into the Weeds

Green Building. Metrics. May 7, Mark Frankel

Building Typology Draft Metrics

The Road to Zero: State Zero Net Energy Buildings. Green California Summit Sacramento, CA April 26, 2017

Responding to Climate Change Imperative: Reducing Energy Use & Operating Costs with ENERGY STAR

Actual Energy Performance of Small Office and K-12 School Buildings Designed to Meet the 30% ASHRAE Advanced Energy Design Guides

22CE Net Zero Carbon Approaches for New and Existing Buildings

Navigating Vermont s New Core Performance Guide. Session Overview 2/18/2008

Winchester High School

CREDIT COMPLIANCE (Please complete the color coded criteria(s) based on the option path selected)

PV Generation Potential 17.1 kbtu/ft2/yr 15.4

Tim Williams. Steve Tatge. Assistant Director, Major Projects Group, Capital Projects Office University of Washington

ENERGY MODELING GUIDELINES. D. Section Building Automation and Control System Guidelines

We created a beautiful, high-performance building that s good for the environment. And it didn t cost us any more to do it.

SURNA Grow Facility: Systems Comparison - IEA

A More Sustainable Future. Schuco Systems for LEED, Passive house, and the Living Building Challenge.

Practitioner Modeling Competition

Net Zero Building Commissioning. Phillip Saieg, CEM, LEED AP O+M Josh Harwood

Mind the Gaps: Post-Occupancy Discoveries from Design to Operation

Public Sector New Construction Overview Calendar Year 2018

Energy Efficiency: Designing Wood-Frame Buildings for Occupant Comfort

Deep Energy Savings in Existing Buildings

Existing Earth and Ocean Sciences (EOS) Building

APPENDIX 2C ENERGY 1. ENERGY SUPPLY AND CONSUMPTION... 1

IES Whole-Building Energy Model Baseline Energy Model Input/ Output Report. Duquesne University Rockwell Hall. Duquesne University smba

Advanced Energy Design and Retrofit Guides

PASSIVE HOUSE IN STUDENT HOUSING

Single Family Homes - over 3,000 sqft. Parfitt Residence

Practitioner Modeling Competition

Introduction and utilizing of natural energy in Net ZEB practice

The energy benefits of View Dynamic Glass

Explain key terms, programs, standards ASHRAE 90.1 ENERGY DOE average energy use

PV Generation Potential 17.1 kbtu/ft2/yr 15.4

Appendix E-1f: Small Building Methodology for Pre-SB2030 Projects

New Buildings Institute

Variance and Optimization in Nonresidential Building Simulation Receptacle Loads

Introduction to Outcome-Based Energy Codes. New Buildings Institute

Holistic Design Approach For Energy Efficiency ASHRAE TECHNOLOGY AWARD CASE STUDIES

References UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) US DOE Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC) US EPA (2007 California Data)

Cost Benefits of SunGuard SN 54

Analysis of the Energy Savings Potential in K-5 Schools in Hot and Humid Climates. Jeff S. Haberl, Ph.D., P.E.

Student Modeling Competition

23-28 = -5. Zero Net Energy Case Study WEST BERKELEY PUBLIC LIBRARY OVERVIEW. Planning & Design Approach. Measured Energy Stats

DPR Phoenix Regional Office Net Zero Certification

Climate Analysis. Daylighting uses solar angles, cloud cover/precipitation, and context. Temperature. Humidity. Precipitation. Wind.

High Performance Consideration Columbia City Home

2018 ENERGY REPORT. Mark J. Ferguson, P.E. Campus Operations & Plant Manager

Energy Assessment Report Clayville Elementary School DRAFT October George Washington Highway, Clayville, RI DRAFT

Commercial HVAC. Emerging Technologies

Exercise 4: Assessing Urban Heat Island Impacts and Evaluating Water Waste and Energy Performance

ASHRAE s LowDown Showdown

The University of Minnesota s Itasca Biological

Building Energy Modeling Professional (BEMP)

Energy Savings Audit

Zero Net Energy Buildings February 12, 2014 Beth Brummitt, CEM, CEA, LEED AP. Your guide for improving the performance and value of buildings

Green California Summit It s Happening Now April 9, 2014 Sacramento, California. Porus Sam Antia

MID-RISE APARTMENT BUILDING PROTOTYPE PHIUS - WUFI PASSIVE

LEED v4 LEED BD+C Credit-by-Credit Review

ASHRAE Standard 90.1 App G, PHI and PHIUS+

Transcription:

Bullitt Center s Energy Performance Introduction In 2007 Congress created a Zero Net Energy Commercial Buildings Initiative with a goal of achieving a market transition to Zero Net Energy for new commercial buildings by 2030. The Bullitt Center will meet that goal in 2013. The Bullitt Center will achieve extraordinary levels of energy efficiency through integrated architectural and engineering design, cutting edge technology and components, carefully selected building materials, and conscious choices by tenants who care about their environmental footprints. These elements will reduce the six-story building s annual energy requirement to the point where it can be provided by a solar array on the building s roof. Figure 1. Matching Energy Use to on-site Generation Capacity

Building Design Strategies High performance envelope The building envelope greatly exceeds the Seattle Building Code requirements, using a triple-glazed curtainwall system that originated in Germany and will now be produced locally. The well-insulated walls have been designed to eliminate thermal bridging and dramatically reduce air infiltration. Building massing and orientation, as well as glazing selection, control heat gain. To the extent possible on a compact, 5-sided urban site, major glazing areas face south and north to improve daylighting and solar control. The building s windows (which open and close automatically in response to conditions outside) were selected for optimal control of heat loss and solar gain while maintaining superb visibility for daylighting. Analysis shows that increasing the thermal performance of the envelope beyond current levels would have little overall impact on energy use in the proposed building. Closed-loop geothermal system and Ventilation The Center s very modest heating and cooling loads are met by ground source heat pumps and on-site geothermal wells. Water loops provide comfortable radiant heating and cooling to the office spaces. Ventilation is provided through a dedicated 100% outside air unit with an air-to-air heat exchanger, so that incoming fresh air is preconditioned by outgoing air. Radiant floor heating and cooling with passive cooling and natural ventilation Operable shading systems are designed for glare control to further mitigate solar heat gain. Operable windows provide free cooling and ventilation when ambient conditions are right Daylight dimming and efficient lighting design Lighting loads in office spaces have been limited to 0.4 Watts per square foot, less than half the 0.9 W/ ft 2 currently allowed under the Seattle code. Automatic controls will dim or turn off the LED lights when daylight provides adequate illumination. Aggressive reduction of plug loads Plug loads for office equipment, such as computers, monitors, servers, printers, and copiers, will be limited to a maximum of 0.8W/ft 2 (and this will be significantly reduced by plug load occupancy sensors).this is approximately half the 1.5W/ ft 2 typical for new office buildings, but it still allows for a computer-intensive environment. Tenants will employ the most efficient state-of-the-art equipment that meets their professional needs. Energy Performance Modeling and Results A complex modeling approach was used to project energy use in the building so as to confirm net-zero-energy operation. The primary energy model was developed in EQuest to project the final energy use, but this model was integrated with other models and calibrated using other design tools. Comfort and airflow analysis was done in TAS. The airflow model was used to evaluate indoor and outdoor temperatures, and estimate the extent to which people were comfortable and needed cooling. The airflow model was also used to project whether

windows would be open or closed during each hour of the year, and these data points were input directly into the energy model. Daylight modeling was used to support the design of a space that could be daylit for most of the occupied hours in a year. Once the design was set, the daylight model was used to generate performance metrics that were then used to calibrate the EQuest daylighting calculations to ensure the energy model was adequately estimating lighting energy consumption. Net zero energy design requires predicting actual energy use. This is in contrast to a comparative approach used in green rating systems such as LEED or in code compliance, where the proposed design is compared to the same building built to a baseline code or standard. As a result, the design team needed to make sure the modeling for this project was robust enough to have confidence in the predicted energy use. Sensitivity analyses were used to study what was important for energy use. Based on the efforts above, the design team estimated end use energy consumption as shown in Table 1 and graphically displayed in Figure 2. The building heating, cooling, ventilating and pumping energy combined are only 3.96 kbtu/sf-yr, or approximately one-quarter of the total building energy use. Another quarter is for electric lighting and domestic hot water. The remainder is what has typically been called "plug loads," but which is actually devices that plug into receptacles and which is not typically addressed by energy codes or green building standards. Table 1. Projected Annual End Use Energy Breakdown Lights IT Server Computers, Monitors, Printers, Copiers and other misc equipment Space Heating Space Cooling Pumps (includes pumps to run water treatment system at about 5000 KWH/yr): Ventilation fans Elevator Domestic HW TOTAL note: multiply kwh values by 3.412 to convert to kbtu 53,000 kwh 20,000 kwh 104,000 kwh 6,000 kwh 5,600 kwh 21,000 kwh 12,000 kwh 7,000 kwh 7,800 kwh 236,400 kwh The resulting EUI (Energy Use Intensity) for the project is as follows: Gross Floor Area in square feet: 52,000 SF Energy Use, as EUI (Energy Use Intensity): 16 kbtu/sf-yr Baseline 2030 EUI, from Target Finder: 92 kbtu/sf-yr Savings over 2030 Baseline: 83%

Figure 2. End Use Energy Breakdown Comparisons with Other High-performing Buildings There is a lack of good data on high-performing buildings in North America, but from the data that is available it appears the Bullitt Center will perform at the forefront of energy efficiency. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Zero Energy Building database currently contains no comparable buildings. The only urban commercial building is a single-story, 6,500 square foot lighting consultancy on the outskirts of San Jose, CA. The other net zero buildings are nature centers, recreation centers, and classroom buildings, all but two of which (a 3,500 square foot tennis club and a 2,200 square foot instructional facility) have higher EUIs than the Bullitt Center. (http://zeb.buildinggreen.com/) In the DOE High Performance Building database, the Bullitt Center is significantly more efficient than any comparably sized urban commercial building currently listed. (http://eere.buildinggreen.com/mtxview.cfm?cfid=104739059&cftoken=76487704) While the design team is confident in taking these many steps to push the limits of building performance, this is not a competition with winners and losers. All the buildings in these databases have taken important strides in the right direction, and while the Bullitt Center plans to take yet another step forward, it is expected to be surpassed soon in this vibrant, creative field.

ENERGY STAR Statement of Energy Design Intent (SEDI) 1 The Bullitt Center N/A Primary Property Function: Office ENERGY STAR Design Score 2 Gross Floor Area (ft 2 ): 52,000 Estimated Date of Certification of Occupancy: Date Generated: January 23, 2014 1. This form may be used to apply for the ENERGY STAR Designed to Earn. This form was generated from Portfolio Manager's target finder: http://www.portfoliomanager.energystar.gov/targetfinder. 2. The ENERGY STAR Score is based on total source energy. The scale is 1-100. A score of 75 is the minimum to be eligible for the ENERGY STAR. Property & Contact Information for Design Project Property Address The Bullitt Center 1501 East Madison Street Seattle, Washington 98122 Project Architect, Owner Contact, Property ID: 3954312 Architect Of Record, Property Owner, Estimated Design Energy No estimated energy information provided. Estimated Design Use Details Office Gross Floor Area Percent That Can Be Cooled Percent That Can Be Heated Number of Computers 175 Number of Workers on Main Shift 175 Weekly Operating Hours 70 52,000 Sq. Ft. 50 % or more 50 % or more Design Energy and Emission Results Metric Design Project Median Property Estimated Savings ENERGY STAR Score (1-100) N/A 50 N/A Energy Reduction (from Median)(%) N/A 0 N/A Source Energy Use Intensity (kbtu/ft2/yr) 0 230 230 Site Energy Use Intensity (kbtu/ft2/yr) 0 91 91 Source Energy Use (kbtu/yr) 0 12,006,800 12,006,800 Site Energy Use (kbtu/yr) 0 4,768,400 4,768,400 Energy Costs ($) 0 88,843 88,843 Total GHG Emissions (MtCO2e) 0 441 441 EPA Form 5900-22 Page 1 of 3 Statement of Energy Design Intent (SEDI) for The Bullitt Center Generated On: 1/23/2014

ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager https://portfoliomanager.energystar.gov/pm/targetfinder;jsessionid=909cd26bd93dc67... Page 1 of 2 1/23/2014 Skip to Page Content: Alt+Shift+CSkip to Common Website Menu: Alt+Shift+MSkip to Public Website Menu: Alt+Shift+P Portfolio Manager Help Target Finder Results Based on the information you have provided, we have calculated metrics to help you understand the energy efficiency associated with your current design and/or target (jump to the detailed table below). For a print out of this information, you can download your Statement of Energy Design Intent. Score for Your Design N/A Your design does not meet the requirements to calculate a score. Learn more about ENERGY STAR scores. Enter estimated energy use for your designto see how it compared to your target and typical properties similar to yours. Energy Use Intensity (EUI) Download Your Statement of Energy Design Intent (SEDI) This document provides an overview of your design and metrics. It is also used for Designed to Earn the ENERGY STAR applications. 300 200 Download & Print Statement About this Property's Design 100 Target: Uses: Energy Types: Edit Target ENERGY STAR Score: 100 Office(100.0%) Energy Not Entered Assumed Mix Based on State & Property Type: Electric - Grid (70.2%) Natural Gas (29.8%) 0 Place Holder Title - Place Holder Body Place Holder Title - Place Holder Body Place Holder Title - Place Holder Body Metrics Comparison for Your Design and/or Target Metric Property Estimate at Design Design Target* Median Property* ENERGY STAR score(1-100) Not Available 100 50 Source EUI(kBtu/ft²) Not Available 68.8 230.9 Site EUI(kBtu/ft²) Not Available 27.3 91.7 Source Energy Use(kBtu) Not Available 3,577,427.2 12,006,800.0 Site Energy Use(kBtu) Not Available 1,421,326.0 4,768,400.0 Energy Cost($) Not Available 26,481.75 88,843.50 Total GHG Emissions(MtCO2e) 0.0 131.7 441.8 * To perform calculations for your design target, we use the fuel mix that you've entered for your design energy estimates. If you have not entered estimated design energy, we'll use the average for your state. To perform calculations for the national median, we will assume the fuel mix and operational details of your property measurement in use, if available. Otherwise, we will use your design estimates. Save Your Design? By saving your design in Portfolio Manager, you can continue to work with your design and eventually track energy consumption after the property has been constructed and is in use. I want to create an account in Portfolio Manager and save my design I already have an account in Portfolio Manager and want to save my design