GRowing Outcomes in Watersheds (GROW) A home-grown ecological goods and services program for Manitoba

Similar documents
MODERNIZING MANITOBA S CONSERVATION DISTRICTS PROGRAM A roadmap to true watershed-based governance

A Proposed Regulation under The Water Rights Act

Surface Water Management Strategy

What We Heard MODERNIZING MANITOBA S CONSERVATION DISTRICTS PROGRAM

Surface Water Management Strategy. What We Heard ... Summit Two November 20, 2012 Viscount Gort, Winnipeg

CONSERVATION DISTRICTS PROGRAM FRAMEWORK FOR THE FUTURE

DRAINAGE. Actions for Tomorrow. Drainage. Actions Today

ALUS CANADA 2017 Report. Ontario Wildlife Foundation. September 2017

Bylaw , being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" 5Improve. Natural + Built Systems

Canada-Ontario Domestic Action Plan for Lake Erie Phosphorus Reduction. Agriculture Sector Working Group April 19, 2017

24. Wildlife Habitat on Farmland


Manitoba: Provincial Policy and Regulation Overview

Recommendations to Enhance Wildlife Benefits of the 2018 Farm Bill

Prioritizing Local Action. Strengthening the Resilience of the Taunton River Watershed

Climate Change Policy

The Blueprint and Council Conclusions:

FEMA s Mitigation Support for Resiliency: Innovative Drought and Flood Mitigation Projects

Conservation Authorities Act Review

FY Biennial Budget Request Mille Lacs SWCD

The Saskatchewan Prairie Conservation Action Plan Partnership

INVESTING IN ENVIRONMENTALLY SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE

Manitoba Agriculture Research and Innovation

Freshwater Ecosystem Services

Lesser Slave Watershed Council. Executive Summary Community Engagement for the Integrated Watershed Management Plan, October December 2016

One Watershed, One Plan

FACTSHEET INTRODUCTION. help rebalance the water cycle, mitigate the effects of climate change and improve human health and livelihoods.

Support legislation that will protect the quantity of water in Lake Erie

Agricultural Crown Lands Program Modernization Public Consultation. What We Heard Summary Report June 2018

BWSR PROGRAMS THAT ADDRESS NUTRIENT LOSS

Case Study Murray-Darling Basin, Australia Eugene, OR. Valuing a Watershed s Natural Capital

2017 MB Envirothon. Theme Training Document

AUMA Policy Paper 2013.A1

Farm Adaptation Innovator Program

The Framework* is built on the Partnership s Vision and three Goals:

our Water A Watershed and Aquifer Planning Model for Saskatchewan

Policy on Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Himachal Pradesh

Developing Metrics & Indicators for the California Water Plan. CA Sustainability Indictors Symposium February 23, 2011

Anyone can come in for technical assistance. NRCS and its partners use the CTA program to provide technical assistance to: farmers, ranchers, local

Low Estimate High Estimate Method/Source Description

Walton Family Foundation Freshwater Initiative Strategy

CONSERVING OUR FUTURE

Manitoba Beef Producers Carbon Pricing Policy

Click to edit Master text styles. Click to edit Master text styles. Click to edit Master text styles

Manitoba s proposed new approach to watershed management and drainage licensing...

21 Century Colorado River Budget

British Columbia s. VVater Act. Modernization. Policy Proposal on British Columbia s new Water Sustainability Act. December 2010

Conservation Ontario s Response to Climate Ready: Ontario s Adaptation Strategy and Action Plan June 2011

Developing a Voluntary Carbon Offsets Program for Ontario

Principles and Assumptions for the Strategy

MEMORANDUM. Purpose: Background:

Climate Smart Resiliency Plans, Policies, and Projects Improvement Plan for: The Town of Caroline

Orange Creek Basin Lakes Public Meeting

Central Assiniboine and Lower Souris River Watershed. Public Consultation What you told us. June 2010

DANE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 5-YEAR UPDATE. Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee 10/10/2013 Chapter 8: Land Use

OurFuture. Protecting. March Ontario Provincial Plans and Conservation Authorities

Ecosystem Goods and Services from Canadian Grasslands Presentation to CFGA. Dimple Roy November 2016

WATERSHED. Maitland Valley. Report Card 201

5. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES

the snapshot version

Central Coast Climate Collaborative

Unify efforts to address water resources for the Big Sky area and surrounding zone of influence in three co-equal water resources focus areas:

Watershed Health and Water Management in the Porcupine Hills

CONFERENCE SCHEDULE IN BRIEF

Maitland Valley WATERSHED

Cannon River One Watershed, One Plan. POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING January 10, 2018 Rice County Government Center Faribault, MN

The Nature Conservancy Cosumnes River Preserve Franklin Boulevard Galt CA 95632

Headwater Wetland Restoration Techniques The Wetland Drain Restoration Project

The Potential for Carbon Dioxide Equivalent Sequestration in Agro-Manitoba

Don Pearson Conservation Ontario

Phase III Watershed Implementation Plans

Protecting and Enhancing Ecosystem Services the Role of Wetlands and Watershed Management in Flood Attenuation Dr. Mark Gloutney Director Regional

CHAPTER 4 WATERSHED PLAN GOALS & OBJECTIVES

Why Do We Need Market Based Instruments to Conserve and Manage Alberta s Riparian Lands?

COST SHARE AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS FOR IMPLEMENTING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO IMPROVE WATER QUALITY

Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. Chapter 3. Stormwater Management Principles and Recommended Control Guidelines

Northeastern Forest and Conservation Nursery Association

Agri-Environment Services Branch (AESB)

awetlands aprairie aforests ahabitat for Fish, Game & Wildlife

2014 Farm Bill Conference Report Analysis

Community Resilience and Mitigation Assessment

Irrigation Development in Manitoba

DEVELOPING AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS FOR CANADA GENERAL PROPOSAL

Manitoba s Submission Guidelines for Peatland Recovery Plans

Integrated Management of the Transboundary Prespa Lake Basin: Experiences, Achievements and Challenges. Dimitrija Sekovski, UNDP Project Manager

draft Environment Strategy

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT

USDA and other Government Agency efforts to Enhance Soil and Water Conservation

CHATHAM PARK EXCEPTIONAL DESIGN EVALUATION

Recommendations for regulating phosphorus from livestock operations in Manitoba Manitoba Phosphorus Expert Committee. 2

Integrated Watershed Management Plan

FARM BILL 2002 Colorado Conservation Provisions

NACWA Perspectives on Water Quality Trading and the National Network s Options and Considerations Guide

The Real Estate Foundation of BC's Input to the Province on the Proposed Water Sustainability Act November 2013

Manitoba s Submission Guidelines for Peatland Recovery Plans

EG&S: Estimating Program Uptake and the Nature of Costs and Benefits

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DES PLAINES RIVER WATERSHED-BASED PLAN WHY A WATERSHED-BASED PLAN? WHAT IS A WATERSHED?

WATER RESOURCE PROGRAM

The Saskatchewan Prairie Conservation Action Plan Partnership

Joint Framework for Action Ghana

Transcription:

GRowing Outcomes in Watersheds (GROW) A home-grown ecological goods and services program for Manitoba PUBLIC CONSULTATION DOCUMENT AUGUST 2017

MINISTERS MESSAGE Dear Manitobans, Manitoba s agriculture industry is well positioned as an environmental solution provider with a tremendous opportunity to provide vital ecological goods and services. As society faces the need to address numerous environmental issues such as water quantity and quality, loss of natural capital (including soils, water and biota), and climate change, it is important to understand how the agriculture sector can contribute to the solution. This government is committed to developing a unique made-in-manitoba program to secure ecological goods and services for the benefit of all Manitobans. Based on the Alternative Land Use Services (ALUS) model, the new program is called GRowing Outcomes in Watersheds (GROW). This program will help to reduce the impacts of flooding, reduce nutrient loading, improve water quality, protect wetlands, mitigate the effects of droughts and protect drinking water sources in partnership with landowners, non-government organizations, and federal and municipal governments. By embracing innovative approaches and a long-term view, the agriculture sector has unique opportunities to sustain natural capital and advance beneficial management practices that provide valuable ecological goods and services. We are committed to delivering real, measurable outcomes that demonstrate value for the investment we re making in programs to improve the health and resiliency of our watersheds. As we develop the GROW program for Manitoba, our goal is to make the most effective use of government and industry investments, while achieving the desired outcomes of reduced flooding, and improved water quality and nutrient management across agro-manitoba. This government is a listening government - we want to hear Manitobans views on issues that matter to them. We look forward to sharing ideas, strengthening partnerships and building new ones as we work toward a better Manitoba. Sincerely, Sincerely, original signed by original signed by Ralph Eichler Rochelle Squires 2 P a g e

Introduction to GRowing Outcomes in Watersheds (GROW) Manitoba Departments of Agriculture and Sustainable Development have committed to implement a program based on the Alternative Land Use Services (ALUS) model to help reduce flooding and improve water quality and nutrient management. It is being done in partnership with landowners, non-government organizations, and federal and municipal governments. This program, GRowing Outcomes in Watersheds (GROW), will provide a made-in-manitoba approach to environmental programming across the agricultural landscape of Manitoba. Ecological goods and services (EG&S) are the environmental benefits derived from healthy ecosystems and include market goods produced from ecosystems (e.g., food), the benefits from ecosystem processes (e.g., water purification), and non-material benefits (e.g., recreation). ALUS is an example of a program that is driven by local communities and landowners. Eligible lands under ALUS generally include restored or maintained wetlands, riparian areas, native prairie and others. ALUS is delivered through community-based organizations, and was originally developed in Manitoba by Keystone Agricultural Producers and Delta Waterfowl Foundation. ALUS payment levels vary greatly, depending on the location and agricultural practices permitted. Manitoba will develop a homegrown approach to ecological goods and services programming a community-driven program that provides sustainable, targeted results on the landscape, including reduced impacts of flooding, reduced nutrient loading, improved water quality, protection for wetlands, drought mitigation and protection of drinking water sources. This new provincial program will allow for flexibility to build on the success of existing federal and provincial program delivery through conservation districts on a watershed basis, to target projects for maximum results on the landscape and ensure programming is locally relevant, integrated and responsive to local priorities. 3 P a g e

Proposed Principles of GROW 1. Sustainable 2. Targeted, watershed-based approach 3. Locally-delivered, farmer focused 4. Voluntary 5. Measurable 6. Evidence-based evaluation Expected outcomes of GROW Reduced flooding Improved water quality, including drinking water Improved on-farm management of nutrients Improved resiliency to the impacts of a changing climate Improved biodiversity and habitat Enhanced carbon storage Enhanced sustainable food production Improved groundwater quality and recharge Are there additional program principles that should be considered during program development? What other opportunities could be leveraged through this programming? Which outcomes would you prioritize for funding under GROW? 4 P a g e

Proposed Eligible Beneficial Management Practices (BMPs) The following BMPs have been proposed for inclusion in Manitoba s GROW program for their ability to provide environmental benefits and meet program objectives. All of the priority BMPs may result in changes in land use for sensitive or marginal areas. For example, small water retention projects may intentionally inundate areas for a short time in the spring to reduce peak flows downstream. These areas may typically already hold some water, so the intention of the BMP would be to design a structure to retain and control the release of water downstream. Similarly, a grassland restoration project may take land that has historically been annually cropped and convert it back to a more suitable use for that soil and landscape by establishing a perennial native or tame forage stand. Priority BMPs: small water retention projects grassland restoration, enhancement and reclamation wetland restoration and enhancement riparian area management Additional BMPs for consideration: soil health improvements - includes implementing new cropping systems to improve soil health, such as a one-time payment to establish a cover crop, inter-crop or poly-crop system natural area management shelterbelts/eco-buffers woodlot restoration, enhancement and rejuvenation aquifer recharge protection What landscapes and practices should be eligible for the GROW program? Are there any landscapes or practices that should NOT be eligible for the program? How can this programming be integrated with other programs and initiatives? How should funding for these practices be allocated? How would you prioritize these practices? 5 P a g e

Funding and Governance of GROW Any new ecological goods and services programming must be sustainable in the context of broader government objectives. Manitoba currently offers a range of agricultural and watershed programming designed to provide environmental benefits, while minimizing environmental risk associated with industry practices. Proposed Funding Criteria Manitoba is proposing an evidence-based project evaluation framework to prioritize funding toward provincial outcomes. To be eligible, a project must provide an incremental benefit to the environment that is consistent with watershed management plans and targeted to local and provincial priorities. For example, lands must be enhanced to be eligible, not simply protected in their current state. Cross-compliance with other provincially-delivered programs is being considered. For example, producers may be required to have a completed Environmental Farm Plan to be eligible for payments under GROW or watershed authorities (conservation districts) may have to show how project outcomes align to GROW criteria. Funds leveraged through other sources may have additional criteria that recipients would have to meet. Funding Administration Model The GROW program will integrate funding from multiple sources to meet program objectives. There are several different ways that the multiple sources of funding can flow to watershed authorities (conservation districts) and farmers. Reduced red tape, efficiency and transparency will be important principles to consider when developing this model. Governance Manitoba is fortunate to have many passionate and dedicated organizations delivering services to farmers. We want to leverage this existing capacity to manage and deliver GROW. We see opportunities for watershed authorities (conservation districts), non-government organizations, industry, Crown corporations and all levels of government in partnering on the program. How should GROW be funded? How should funding levels for projects and payments be determined? How can we leverage funding from non-government, municipalities, industry and landowners to achieve more outcomes on the landscape? How should projects be evaluated or prioritized for funding? 6 P a g e

HOW TO PROVIDE FEEDBACK We want to hear from you. Please take advantage of this opportunity and provide your thoughts and suggestions on the GRowing Outcomes in Watersheds (GROW) Program. All comments received in response to this consultation document will be read and considered as we move forward. Comments collected in response to this consultation document may be used by the Manitoba government to inform changes to existing legislative, regulatory, program, and policy frameworks. Written comments can be provided by: Email to watershedconsult@gov.mb.ca with the subject line GROW Consultation Mail written submissions to: Attention: GROW Consultation Box 11, 200 Saulteaux Crescent Winnipeg, MB R3J 3W3 The deadline for feedback is October 6, 2017. 7 P a g e

This paper is available in alternate formats by contacting the Department s Accessibility Co-ordinator at 204-945-4451. 8 P a g e