Noise Impact Study for Hyatt House in Davis, California

Similar documents
7.0 NOISE ELEMENT 7.1 INTRODUCTION

From: Tyler Adams, Mei Wu Acoustics

SECTION 4 - NOISE INTRODUCTION

Elverta Park Residential Development

Appendix G: Noise Supporting Information

Noise Analysis for Latitude II City of Escondido, California

BAY MEADOWS PHASE II SPAR 2 SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA

Appendix G New Bus Facility Noise Assessment September 2014

49 unit Altamira apartment project, Broadway Sonoma, CA Environmental Noise Assessment

COMPONENTS OF THE NOISE ELEMENT

LEED for Homes Approved ID Request:

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT

MOUNTAIN HOUSE SPECIFIC PLAN II

NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS 28-UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX LA MIRADA, CALIFORNIA

Chapter 21. Noise BACKGROUND

McDonald's NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF LA PALMA

FIGURE N-1 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT NEAR TRANSPORTATION NOISE SOURCES

Perris Circle 3 NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF PERRIS

County of El Dorado Department of Transportation Diamond Springs Parkway Project Draft EIR Appendix K: Environmental Noise Assessment

11.0 NOISE ELEMENT NOISE ELEMENT THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON GENERAL PLAN 11-1

3.3 NOISE Existing Setting Thresholds of Significance

3820 Chiles Road EIR

A. INTRODUCTION B. NOISE ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY

6 Noise. Transient noise events may be described by their maximum A weighted noise level (dba) Hourly Leq values are called Hourly Noise Levels.

ROSEN GOLDBERG &DER Consultants in Acoustics

4.13 NOISE AND VIBRATION

Level of Significance after Mitigation Impacts would be less than significant.

3.1 Noise Overlay District

NOISE GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES

NOISE GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

MAIN STREET PRECISE PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE STUDY REDWOOD CITY, CALIFORNIA

Appendix F. Noise Worksheets

APPENDIX C. Environmental Noise Assessment

15.1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

4.10 NOISE. A. Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Acoustics

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT

Cotati Downtown Specific Plan Draft EIR

Wood and Acoustics. The Acoustical Impact of Mixed Use Projects on Multi-Family Housing. Has Your Firm Been Sued Yet!

PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS

14: INTRODUCTION

Appendix F. Environmental Noise Assessment

4.6 NOISE Introduction

Peak noise levels during any time period can be characterized with statistical terms.

ADDENDUM TO EIR Serrano Village J5/J6 Residential Project

Identifying impacts of amplified sound in commercial spaces below residences in mixed-use buildings

4.10 NOISE Introduction

Environmental Noise Assessment 1020, 1024, 1028, 1032 & 1042 Sixth Line Oakville, ON

Section 4-7 Noise STUDY METHODS Acoustic Fundamentals Amplitude Frequency

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

APPENDIX 3.11-A NOISE ANALYSIS DATA

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ANALYSIS - ANTELOPE ROAD WIDENING PROJECT. Sacramento County, California. Prepared For

Protecting sensitive land uses, such as schools, hospitals, and libraries from sound levels in excess of residential sound levels.

3.12 NOISE Regulatory Setting Environmental Setting EXISTING NOISE SOURCES AND SENSITIVE LAND USES

11 NOISE INTRODUCTION NOISE FUNDAMENTALS AND TERMINOLOGY

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

Home2 Suites by Hilton

4.10 NOISE. Introduction. Setting

268 South Main Street, South Amboy, NJ. HUD Noise Screening Analysis

Placer Vineyards Specific Plan EIR prepared by Placer County, and

4.10 NOISE MELROSE + OCEANSIDE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment Chapel Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Town of Portola Valley General Plan. Noise Element

APPENDIX L IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX

Noise Control Study. for. Avalon Public School Portobello Boulevard at Stormwind Avenue in Ottawa, Ontario. Revision 1

3.5 Noise. A. Setting. 1. Fundamentals of Environmental Noise

3.11 NOISE INTRODUCTION

3.10 NOISE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING. Noise Characteristics

Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment Montreal Road. Ottawa, Ontario

N-1(b) Vehicle and Equipment Idling. Construction vehicles and equipment shall not be left idling for longer than five minutes when not in use.

Traffic Noise Analysis for The Westerly City of Simi Valley, California

4.6 NOISE AND VIBRATION

4.9 NOISE 1. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 4.9 1

4.11 NOISE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Characteristics of Noise

Noise Assessment Report

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

WILSON IHRIG & ASSOCIATES ACOUSTICAL AND VIBRATION CONSULTANTS

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 8. NOISE

10 NOISE ELEMENT. A. Background Information

Appendix C Noise Study

Dormitory Authority of the State of New York Page 14-1 Staten Island Supreme Courthouse Project Draft EIS

PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS

PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS

Appendix G: Noise Modeling

Attachment E2 Noise Technical Memorandum SR 520

Merivale Road Residential Development 1683 Merivale Road Noise Control Study

Amoruso Ranch Specific Plan (ARSP) EIR prepared by the City of Roseville (City of Roseville 2016a);

MUSEUM PLACE ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE AND VIBRATION ASSESSMENT

4.10 Noise Setting. a. Overview of Noise and Vibration Measurement

DEL MONTE FOREST PLAN MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

City of High Point Airport Overlay District Noise Level Reduction Design Standards

APPENDIX D NOISE QUALITY ANALYSIS, PROCEDURES AND RESULTS

Noise Feasibility Study EMGO (North Oakville I) Ltd., Town of Oakville, Ontario

Island County Noise Zone Maps Adopted with Ordinance C [PLG ] August 12, 2002 Approved by WA State Building Code Council November 26, 2002

Noise Monitoring Data

4.3 NOISE Environmental Setting. Fundamentals of Sound and Environmental Noise

8. Appendix F Acoustic Assessment

Noise Control Study. Proposed Mixed-use Development. 112 Montreal Road City of Ottawa. Prepared for: DCR Phoenix Developments

This section discusses and analyzes the ambient noise characteristics of the proposed Cluster I Solar Power Project.

Draft Dulles Toll Road Highway Noise Policy

Transcription:

Noise Impact Study for Hyatt House in Davis, California Prepared for The HR Group Architects 2277 Fair Oaks Boulevard, Studio 220 Sacramento, CA 95825 Prepared by Brian R. Smith, Principal INCE Board Certified December 30, 2015 15-0141 9630 BRUCEVILLE ROAD, SUITE 106 ELK GROVE, CALIFORNIA 95757 PHONE 916.685.8841 WWW.AEC-ACOUSTICS.COM

Table of Contents Summary...3 Noise Regulations...3 City of Davis General Plan Noise Regulations (Community Safety Section)...3 City of Davis Municipal Code...4 2013 California Green Building Standards Code (Cal Green)...5 Site & Project Description...5 Measurement Equipment & Methods...5 Exterior Acoustic Environment...6 Existing...6 Existing Plus Project...8 Cumulative Plus Project...8 Interior Acoustic Environment...9 Noise Impacts & Mitigation...9 List of Tables TABLE 1. Noise Level Standards for Exterior Noise Exposure (Table 19, City of Davis General Plan)...4 TABLE 2. Noise Level Standards for Interior Noise Exposure (Table 20, City of Davis General Plan)...4 TABLE 3. Assumed Roadway Traffic Volumes and Mixes to Calculate Existing Day-Night and Hourly Average Sound Levels for Hyatt House Hotel in Davis...7 TABLE 4. Assumed Railway Traffic Volumes and Source Levels to Calculate Existing and Future Day-Night and Hourly Average Sound Levels for Hyatt House Hotel in Davis...7 TABLE 5. Predicted Ldn Sound Levels for Existing Conditions at Proposed Davis Hyatt House...7 TABLE 6. Assumed Roadway Traffic Volumes and Mixes to Calculate Cumulative Plus Project Day-Night and Hourly Average Sound Levels for Hyatt House Hotel in Davis...8 TABLE 7. Predicted Ldn Sound Levels for Cumulative Plus Project Conditions at Proposed Davis Hyatt House 8 List of Figures Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 3. Figure 4. Satellite Map of Davis Hyatt House Project Area with Measurement Locations Indicated... 11 Sound Level Measurements Made Near the Proposed North Face of Davis Hyatt House.... 12 Results of Measurements Made at Position #2 Near Existing Albany Ave. Residence Backyard... 13 Sound Level Measurements Made Near the Proposed North Face of Hyatt House at East End.... 14 2

Summary Hyatt House is a proposed new hotel to be built at 2750 Cowell Boulevard in the City of Davis. A total of 120 guest rooms will be included in the 4-story hotel. Surrounding properties are a mix of single family residential and commercial uses. A noise impact study was required by the City of Davis due to the proximity of the project site to several major noise sources including traffic on Interstate 80 and train activity on the nearby rail line. Road traffic on Interstate 80 is the existing major noise source impacting the project site and will continue to be so for the next 20 years. Exterior noise guidelines are given in Chapter 21 of the City of Davis General Plan 1. The City does not set specific noise level limits for development of transient lodging projects other than encouraging development within the Normally Acceptable exterior standard and allowing development within the Conditionally Acceptable range once a noise study has been completed. For transient lodging, the normally acceptable range is an exterior day-night average, Ldn, sound level of 60 db(a) or less and 60 db(a) to 75 db(a) for the conditionally acceptable range. The predicted existing Ldn sound levels at the proposed location of the north face of the hotel building closest to the major noise sources is 68 db(a) at a height of 5 feet above ground. Cumulative plus project Ldn sound levels in the year 2035 are predicted to reach 72 db(a) for the north façade without mitigation due to increases in overall road traffic volumes and changing site condition assumptions. The increase in road traffic due to the project itself will be minimal (resulting in less than 0.5 db(a) increase in overall levels) and insignificant per the City s standards. Existing and cumulative plus project noise levels for the site fall within the conditionally acceptable range per the General Plan. Although the project will add some non-transportation sources to the site (e.g. mechanical equipment), Ldn sound levels will decrease at residents along Albany Avenue due to significant shielding of transportation noise sources from the proposed hotel building. No mitigation is required. California Building Code no longer requires multi-family housing and transient lodging to meet an interior Ldn sound level limit of 45 db(a) in habitable rooms due to transportation noise sources. Instead, the previous standards have been replaced by the 2013 California Green Building Standards Code (Cal Green) Section 5.507.42. Under the performance method of compliance with Cal Green (5.507.4.2), the interior environment must meet an hourly Leq of 50 dba in occupied areas during any hour of operation based on acoustical analysis. Sound levels are predicted to be 48 db(a) or less for habitable rooms using the exterior sound level data and proposed exterior construction assumptions. No mitigation is required to meet interior sound levels. Noise Regulations Noise regulations for the City of Davis are found in Chapter 21 of the General Plan and within the City s Municipal Code3. The noise section of the General Plan is used to assess the potential for noise impacts associated with transportation and non-transportation sources prior to a project approval while the Municipal Code address existing noise sources (applicable to the project once complete). The California Building Code no longer specifies exterior sound transmission standards with limits on interior Ldn sound levels for multifamily housing and lodging (1207.11 of the 2007 CBC). Instead, the 2013 California Green Building Standards Code (Cal Green) Section 5.507.4 contains acoustical requirements for nonresidential buildings to limit exterior noise intrusion. Each of the noise regulations are described below. City of Davis General Plan Noise Regulations (Community Safety Section) The City of Davis Community Safety Section VII of the General Plan contains acoustical criteria that encompasses both transportation and non-transportation noise sources; however, it does not provide separate criteria to distinguish these two unique source types. Noise levels from transportation sound sources, such as road or rail traffic, are typically used to address potential noise impacts on new 3

residential or other noise sensitive developments. The transportation noise criteria can also be used to address impacts from potential increases in road traffic or other transportation noise as a direct result of the new project. Acoustic criteria contained in the Noise Element for transportation sound sources are based on the day-night average, Ldn, sound level metric or the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) descriptor. The Ldn noise descriptor averages measured or predicted sound levels over 24-hours after applying a 10 db penalty to nighttime (10 p.m. to 7 a.m.) sounds. Similar to Ldn, CNEL is the energy average of the A-weighted sound levels occurring over a 24-hour period, with a 10-dB penalty applied to A-weighted sound levels occurring during the nighttime hours between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m., and a 5-dB penalty applied to the A-weighted sound levels occurring during evening hours between 7 p.m. and 10 p.m. The penalty is applied because people trying to sleep during these hours are more sensitive to external sounds. An acoustical study is needed when noise-sensitive land uses will be subjected to daynight average sound levels, Ldn, greater than 60 db. Table 19 in Chapter 21 of the General Plan lists categories of land use and presents levels of acceptability for various daily noise exposures. Even though the Ldn metric is purposely suited for transportation noise sources, the noise chapter applies the noise level thresholds to vehicular and stationary sources as well as noise emanating from temporary activities. Table 1 below replicates Table 19 from the General Plan applicable to Residential and Transient Lodging land uses. Policy NOISE 1.1 of Chapter 21 aims to minimize noise by trying to achieve the Normally Acceptable exterior standard in development areas, but allows development within the Conditionally Acceptable once a noise study has been completed. Cumulative and project specific impacts by new development on existing residential land uses must also meet the standards of Table 1. TABLE 1. Noise Level Standards for Exterior Noise Exposure (Table 19, City of Davis General Plan) Land Use Residential Transient Lodging Motels, Hotels Community Noise Exposure, Ldn or CNEL, dba Normally Conditionally Normally Clearly Acceptable Acceptable Unacceptable Unacceptable Under 60 60-70 70-75 Above 75 Under 60 60-75 75-80 Above 80 Although the General Plan also includes an interior noise standard (Table 20), it does not list Transient Lodging as an applicable land use, therefore, it would not apply to interior spaces within the hotel. The proposed hotel project would, however, need to meet both the exterior and interior limits at the nearby residences due to new non-transportation sources created by the project (e.g. mechanical equipment). Table 2 provides the interior noise level standards within the City of Davis General Plan. No sound level metric was provided for this table within the General Plan, therefore, it was assumed to either be Ldn or an hourly Leq. TABLE 2. Noise Level Standards for Interior Noise Exposure (Table 20, City of Davis General Plan) Land Use Residences, K-12 schools, hospitals, and churches Offices Assumed Ldn or Hourly Leq Noise Level (dba) 45 55 City of Davis Municipal Code Chapter 24 of the City of Davis Municipal Code contains a noise section that serves as the City s Noise Ordinance. Table No. 1 of the noise regulations (Chapter 24) sets limits for residential property impacted by (presumably) non-transportation sources. Noise sources cannot exceed a maximum noise level of 50 4

dba between 9 p.m. and 7 a.m. and 55 dba between 7 a.m. and 9 p.m. applied at the property line of the receiving noise sensitive land use. Chapter 24 uses the term maximum noise level, however, the definition of noise level earlier in the chapter suggests that it is actually an L eq (average) rather than an Lmax (instantaneous maximum) sound level descriptor. Section 24.02.030 sets the true maximum noise level limit (Lmax) at 20 dba above the limits, resulting in Lmax limits of 70 and 75 dba during nighttime and daytime hours, respectively. Section 24.02.040 lists several special provisions and exceptions to the noise regulations. Of particular note for the Hyatt House project are the exemption of construction and landscaping noise (provided both are limited 7 am to 7 pm Monday thru Friday and 8 am to 8 pm Saturday and Sunday) and the exemption of air conditions, pool pumps, and similar equipment. Chapter 24 also contains a subjective general noise nuisance regulation for disturbing the peace. 2013 California Green Building Standards Code (Cal Green) Previous California Building Code standards specified exterior sound transmission standards with limits on interior Ldn sound levels for multifamily housing and lodging (1207.11 of the 2007 CBC). No longer applicable, the previous standards have been replaced by the 2013 California Green Building Standards Code (Cal Green) Section 5.507.4. Cal Green requires that buildings within transportation noise contours of 65 dba CNEL or Ldn be required to evaluate the building shell to provide acceptable interior sound levels. The code offers two methods for meeting the interior sound level standard: a prescriptive method that stipulates a minimum building envelope composite STC rating of 50 (OITC 40) with exterior windows meeting a minimum STC rating of 40 (OITC 30), or a performance method where the interior environment must meet an hourly Leq of 50 dba in occupied areas during any hour of operation based on acoustical analysis. The Davis Hyatt House project will use the performance method (Section 5.507.4.2) with this report serving as documentation of compliance with the standard. Site & Project Description Hyatt House is a proposed four-story hotel with 120 guest rooms at 2750 Cowell Boulevard in Davis 4. In addition to the guest rooms, the hotel will have a meeting room, fitness center, kitchen and dining spaces, facility support spaces, and a pool. The outdoor pool will be on the south side of the property. A walledin outdoor common area is planned for the north side of the building adjacent to the dining area. Vehicles will enter and exit the site to the north via Cowell Boulevard. The hotel building will face Interstate 80 and Cowell Boulevard to the north, is adjacent to a bike path and a gymnastics facility to the east, backs up to an existing greenbelt to the south, and is bordered by undeveloped land to the west. Single family homes exist along Albany Avenue to the south beyond the greenbelt and bike path. The backyards of the Albany Avenue homes back to the greenbelt and are separated by a wood fence. The existing project site and surrounding landscape is mostly flat land. Surrounding properties are a mixture of single family residential, commercial, and undeveloped land. The project site was covered in short grass at the time of testing. Measurement Equipment & Methods Field sound tests were used to measure the existing ambient environment at the project site. Standard sound measuring equipment was used during the tests. Field sound measurements were made using one Larson Davis 831 (s/n 2325) sound analyzer and two iprecision microphones (s/n CQ10053 and CQ10054) each coupled with ipad Air 2 tablets. All three systems employ 1/2 inch random incidence condenser microphones. A Larson Davis CAL200 calibrator was used to calibrate these meters and the microphones to 114 db at 1000 Hz before beginning measurements. The instruments conform to the requirements of a Type I instrument per American National Standards Institute5. A windscreen covered each microphone during all sound measurements. Microphones were mounted on tripods approximately 5.5 feet to 7 feet above ground level. Meters were set to measure statistical sound levels 5

over consecutive 5-minute intervals to identify sources and variations in sound with time. Statistical sound level descriptors such as the L10, L50 and L90 were used to quantify the duration of time a specific threshold was reached. These are, respectively, the sound levels exceeded 10 percent, 50 percent and 90 percent of the time. The sound level meters also capture the maximum sound level, L MAX and the average sound level, Leq. Average Leq sound levels were used to calibrate the transportation noise model. Field sound measurements were made on December 16, 2015 at three positions on the project site: Site 1 was a test position 105 feet south of the near lane of Cowell Boulevard toward the middle to west end of the project area, the approximate location of the proposed north face of the hotel. Site 2 was located directly south of Site 1 near the property line for the residents along Albany Avenue. Site 3 was positioned also at a distance of approximately 105 feet south of Cowell Boulevard, but at the east end of the site approximately 150 feet west of the bike path. A satellite map showing approximate measurement locations is provided in Figure 1. Exterior Acoustic Environment Existing Vehicle traffic on Interstate 80 is the major existing sound source impacting the proposed project site and existing residences. Secondary sources include traffic on Cowell Boulevard, trains on a major east-west rail line just north of I-80, aircraft overflights, and general non-transportation activity in the area. Interstate 80 is a major east-west highway through the City of Davis. Near the site, I-80 is three lanes in each direction with a posted speed limit of 65 MPH. Cowell Boulevard is a two lane frontage road with a posted speed limit of 40 MPH. Sound levels were measured during consecutive 5-minute intervals at three positions within the proposed project area. Displayed in Figure 2 are the results of continuous measurements made at the approximate location of the north face of the Hyatt House, at a distance of 105 feet from the near lane of Cowell Boulevard. Sound levels were consistent and steady throughout the test period with overall average Leq sound levels of approximately 62 db(a). Similarly consistent results are shown in Figure 3 for Site 2, although average Leq levels were lower by 3 to 4 db(a) as expected due to increased distance from the major noise source, Interstate 80. Sound levels at Site 3 were approximately 2-3 dba higher than for Site 1 despite a similar distance from I-80 as shown in Figure 4. This could be due to differences in the meter itself and the fact that the microphone for Site 3 was higher off of the ground than for Site 1. The data shows that the major noise source, traffic on I-80, was fairly constant as the difference between the L50 and Leq metrics was small. Traffic on I-80 was clearly the dominant source based on the measurement data. Calculations of predicted hourly average and day-night average sound levels were made using the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Highway Noise Prediction Model 6. The FHWA model was modified to include the CalTrans noise emission levels 7. This model assumes freely flowing traffic, a condition that was typical for I-80 and Cowell Boulevard. Road visibility and ground conditions were considered in calculations of the hourly average sound levels at each test position. The ground was assumed to be acoustically soft for automobiles, medium trucks and heavy trucks. Significant reductions in road noise has occurred over the years due to improved tire tread and road surface designs. Unfortunately, transportation noise model formulas have not been adjusted accordingly. Field sound level measurement data was used to calibrate the acoustical model to adjust to real world conditions. Traffic volumes on Interstate 80 were taken from CalTrans published data while volumes on Cowell Boulevard were obtained from Average Daily Traffic (ADT) data provided by the City of Davis Public Works Department website8. Volumes and other information for Interstate 80 and Cowell Boulevard used to predict existing sound levels for the project site are displayed in Table 3 below: 6

TABLE 3. Assumed Roadway Traffic Volumes and Mixes to Calculate Existing Day-Night and Hourly Average Sound Levels for Hyatt House Hotel in Davis Road Name I-80 Cowell Blvd 2013/14 ADT 124,000 7,043 Peak Hourly 11,600 868 Speed (MPH) 65 40 # of Lanes 6 2 % Heavy Trucks 6.0 1.0 % Med. Trucks 2.5 2.0 % Trucks @ Night 7.0 7.0 % Autos @Night 12.0 12.0 Noise levels from the nearby rail line were more difficult to isolate given the dominance of traffic noise on Interstate 80. Measurement data showed little to no difference in 5-minute average sound levels with or without a train at a distance of approximately 440 feet from the nearest rail line. As a conservative estimate, Sound Exposure Level (SEL) data from previous project measurements and from the Mace Ranch Innovation Center EIR9 were used to calculate Leq and Ldn sound levels for the Davis Hyatt House project. Train volume information was also taken from published Amtrak schedules. Volumes and source sound level information used to predict existing sound levels for train activity are displayed in Table 4 below: TABLE 4. Assumed Railway Traffic Volumes and Source Levels to Calculate Existing and Future DayNight and Hourly Average Sound Levels for Hyatt House Hotel in Davis Rail Operator UPRR (Freight) Amtrak (Passenger) Day Volume (7 am - 10 pm) 10 27 Night Volume (7 am - 10 pm) 5 7 SEL @150 99 dba 84 dba Horn (Y/N) N N The General Plan does not have specific outdoor day-night average noise level limits applicable to transient lodging land use, other than to discourage development beyond the conditionally acceptable range of up to 75 dba. The aim (presumably) is to limit the interior sound levels within guest rooms due to exterior sources, rather than to meet a specific limit at an outdoor activity area. Sound level predictions for existing conditions were made for the north face of the proposed Davis Hyatt House for the purposes of interior sound level analysis. Predictions were also made for the typical backyard outdoor activity areas for the existing residences along Albany Avenue. Table 5 below provides predicted Ldn sound levels for existing conditions (not including any shielding): TABLE 5. Predicted Ldn Sound Levels for Existing Conditions at Proposed Davis Hyatt House Receiver Location North Face Hyatt Backyard 2715 Albany Ave I-80 66 (67) 62 (63) Predicted Ldn (Worst Hourly Leq) Sound Level, db(a) Cowell Blvd. Rail Line Other Sources Total All Sources 59 (60) 63 (58) <45 68 (68) 55 (56) 62 (57) <45 65 (65) The proposed Hyatt House project site falls within the conditionally acceptable range for transient lodging development. 7

Existing Plus Project The proposed Davis Hyatt House project will add new sound sources to the existing acoustical environment. Some traffic will be added to Cowell Boulevard as a result of the hotel. Traffic increases are expected to raise Ldn sound levels at the project site by less than 0.5 db, especially given the negligible influence of the hotel on the high-volume Interstate 80. The proposed hotel building will actually reduce transportation noise at residences along Albany Avenue due to shielding of traffic noise from Cowell Blvd., Interstate 80, and the nearby rail line. The 338 long and almost 48 tall building will block a majority of the line of site to the backyards of these residences resulting in an estimated 9 dba of attenuation for homes directly behind the hotel. The Davis Hyatt House project will add some nontransportation sources to the site including HVAC equipment, pool equipment, landscaping maintenance, and general activity in the parking lot and around the building. Since all sources are treated equally under the Ldn statistic by the Davis General Plan, the decrease in transportation noise at the residences will more than offset any increases from non-transportation sources. Construction and landscaping noise are exempt from the City of Davis Municipal Code, as is noise from air conditioning equipment, pool equipment, and similar sources. Cumulative Plus Project Road traffic on Interstate 80 is expected to remain the dominant sound source influencing Ldn levels at the project site for the next 20 years to 2035. Other sound sources will remain secondary in importance. Traffic volumes on Cowell Boulevard are expected to grow at a rate of 2.5% per year over the next 20 years compared with a more modest 1% growth rate for Interstate 80. Traffic speeds and mixes were assumed to remain at current levels. Volumes and other information for I-80 and Cowell Boulevard used to predict cumulative plus project sound levels for the project site are displayed in Table 6 below: TABLE 6. Assumed Roadway Traffic Volumes and Mixes to Calculate Cumulative Plus Project Day-Night and Hourly Average Sound Levels for Hyatt House Hotel in Davis Road Name I-80 Cowell Blvd Estimated 2035 ADT 152,800 12,125 Peak Hourly 14,300 1,495 Speed (MPH) 65 40 # of Lanes 6 2 % Heavy Trucks 6.0 1.0 % Med. Trucks 2.5 2.0 % Trucks @ Night 7.0 7.0 % Autos @Night 12.0 12.0 Sound level predictions for cumulative plus project conditions were made for the north face of the proposed Davis Hyatt House for the purposes of interior sound level analysis. Predictions were also made for the typical backyard outdoor activity areas of the existing residences along Albany Avenue. No increase in rail activity was assumed for future conditions, therefore, the assumptions in Table 4 were also used to calculate future rail noise levels. Ground conditions were assumed to transition to more acoustically hard characteristics for future conditions due to the addition of paved parking lots and the building. The Albany Avenue residence backyard location includes the anticipated effect of shielding from the hotel. Table 7 below provides predicted Ldn sound levels for cumulative plus project conditions: TABLE 7. Predicted Ldn Sound Levels for Cumulative Plus Project Conditions at Proposed Davis Hyatt House Receiver Location North Face Hyatt Backyard 2715 Albany Ave I-80 70 (71) 58 (59) Predicted Ldn (Worst Hourly Leq) Sound Level, db(a) Cowell Blvd. Rail Line Other Sources Total All Sources 63 (64) 63 (58) <45 72 (72) 51 (52) 54 (49) <45 60 (60) 8

Cumulative plus project Ldn sound levels are predicted to fall within the upper end of the conditionally acceptable range for transient lodging land use per the City s Noise Element. While there are no specific outdoor activity area noise limits for transient lodging, placing the main pool activity area on the south side of the hotel building will provide significant shielding from transportation noise sources. The proposed open area on the north side of the building will also include a wall on the north side of the outdoor area. No mitigation is required. The main purpose of calculating exterior noise levels at the north building façade is to evaluate the interior acoustic environment per Cal Green standards. Interior Acoustic Environment California Building Code no longer requires that multi-family residential or transient lodging facilities meet an Ldn sound level limit of 45 db(a). Instead, Section 5.507.4.2 (Performance method) of Cal Green requires that buildings within transportation noise contours of 65 dba (or higher) CNEL or Ldn be required to evaluate the building shell to ensure the interior environment does not exceed an hourly L eq of 50 dba in occupied areas during any hour of operation. Each component of the building shell contributes to sound isolation quality of the envelope. Exterior noise intrusion for a typical hotel room can come through the wall itself, but more typically through the windows or through an HVAC vent. Acoustical analysis was completed for representative hotel rooms and compared with Cal Green limits. A 2 db margin of safety is applied to the interior acoustic analysis when trying to meet the Cal Green interior limit of 50 db. This margin of safety is used because the noise prediction model is only accurate to ±1.5 db(a) and because Sound Transmission Class, STC, ratings of building components are based on laboratory tests and construction techniques with quality that can seldom be duplicated in the field. Initial building plans and designs from a similar Hyatt House project were used. Exterior wall construction will consist of insulated studs, 5/8 gypsum board on the interior, and an EIFS system on the exterior consisting of EPS insulation and 3-coat stucco. Windows will consist of a typical 1 insulated glazing system with two layers of ¼ thick glass separated by a ½ airspace. Instead of a packaged terminal air conditioner (PTAC) unit sticking through the wall and allowing a weak path for sound transmission, a VTAC (vertical) variation will be used. The VTAC still has an exterior mechanical louver for outside air, but is oriented vertically in a closet with short, ducted supply and return air paths. Although sound test data is unavailable, the VTAC design results in less exterior noise intrusion than the typical PTAC designs. Exterior sound levels from Table 7 along with a traffic spectrum measured on site were used to predict interior sound levels. Interior sound levels were predicted to be less than 48 db(a) based on the initial plans. No additional mitigation is needed to meet interior sound levels for the proposed Hyatt House in Davis. Noise Impacts & Mitigation The change in exterior Ldn sound levels from existing to existing plus project or cumulative to cumulative plus project conditions due to the addition of road traffic generated by the project will be insignificant. Overall exterior noise levels on the project site will fall within the conditionally acceptable range per the City s General Plan for both existing plus project and cumulative plus project conditions without mitigation. Interior sound levels will be insignificant per Cal Green using the described exterior wall and window construction. Interior sound levels are predicted to meet Cal Green requirements without mitigation. This assumes, however, that certain minimum construction standards are met as outlined below: I. General Minimum Construction Requirements 9

A. All joints in exterior walls shall be sealed airtight around windows and doors, at the wall perimeter and at major seams. B. All above ground penetrations of exterior walls by electrical and plumbing components, windows, etc. shall be sealed airtight on both sides of the wall with a resilient, non-hardening caulking or mastic. C. Basic exterior wall construction shall comprise the following material of equal surface weight and Sound Transmission Class, STC rating. 1. 2. 3. 4. 2" x 4" wood or metal studs at 16 to 24 inches on center. Minimum R-13 insulation in the stud cavities, 5/8" thick gypsum wallboard fastened to the interior face of the wood studs. The wall shall be fully taped and finished, and sealed around the perimeter with a combination of backer rod and resilient, non-hardening caulking, The exterior surface shall be finished with the following or with another product with equal or greater surface weight: a) 3-coat (minimum ¾ thick) stucco system 5. 6. 7. Ceilings shall be finished with a minimum 5/8" gypsum board with minimum R-19 insulation in the ceiling. Windows shall have a minimum STC rating of 28 or better. Windows shall have an air infiltration rate of less than or equal to 0.20 CFM/lin.ft. when tested with a 25 mile an hour wind per ASTM standards. There shall be no need to open windows to provide a habitable interior environment. Ventilation or air-conditioning systems consisting of an individual VTAC unit for each guest room are required. Although no test data is available, VTAC system in a closet was assumed to perform at an equivalent STC 28 (OITC 20) or better 10

Figure 1. Satellite Map of Davis Hyatt House Project Area with Measurement Locations Indicated. 11

Figure 2. Sound Level Measurements Made Near the Proposed North Face of Davis Hyatt House. 12

Figure 3. Results of Measurements Made at Position #2 Near Existing Albany Ave. Residence Backyard. 13

Figure 4. Sound Level Measurements Made Near the Proposed North Face of Hyatt House at East End. 14

Davis General Plan, Policy Document, Section VII Chapter 21. Noise, Prepared by the City of Davis, Adopted May 2001, Amended Through January 2007, Printed March 2010; pp. 333 thru 346. 2 2013 California Green Building Standards Code California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 11 (CALGreen), California Building Standards Commission, Effective January 1, 2014; Chapter 5 Nonresidential Mandatory Measures, Section 5.507.4 Acoustical Control pp. 49-50. 3 Davis Municipal Code, Chapter 24 Noise Regulations, City of Davis Municipal Code, Quality Code Publishing, Seattle, WA; Current through Ordinance 2463 and the November 2015 code supplement; http://qcode.us/codes/davis/ 4 Planning Submittal Package, Hyatt House, Davis, California, HRGA Architecture, Sacramento, CA; November 11, 2015. 5 American National Standards Institute, ANSI, Standard Specification for Sound Level Meters, S1.4-1983 (Precision) 6 T.M. Barry & J.A. Readgan, FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model, FHWA-Rd-77-108 (Federal Highway Administration, Office of Research, Office of Environmental Policy) December 1978. 7 R.W. Hendriks, California Vehicle Noise Emission Levels, FHWA/CA/TL-87/03 (Office of Transportation Laboratory, California, Department of Transportation) Sacramento, California, 95819, January 1987. 8 Cowell Blvd. West of Drummond Ave. traffic data provided by the City of Davis Public Works Traffic Division, traffic count dated November 5, 2013. http://cityofdavis.org/city-hall/publicworks/transportation/traffic-division-home/traffic-data-map. 9 Draft EIR, Mace Ranch Innovation Center Project, 4.11 Noise and Vibration, Prepared by J. C. Brennan & Associates, Inc.; March 16, 2015. 1 15