PILOT CASE STUDY WHICH PARTICIPATION FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE DORA BALTEA RIVER AND ITS TRIBUTARIES? MAY 2017

Similar documents
Hydropower impacts on river status components

WP4.4 Var MCA alternatives description

WP4.4 Astico MCA alternatives description

WP7-Action 7.2 Cordevole new data list

Press kit September 2010

Community-Based Watershed Management

Definitions and outcomes of NWRM EU project

WP7-Action 7.2 Astico new data list

Project Proposal for Development of Chu River Basin Management Plan

Javier Mateo-Sagasta, International Water Management Institute, Sri Lanka

Local level Actor motivation for long term healthy riverine habitat management. Experience in Latvia.

International Hydrological Programme PROPOSAL FOR THE LAUNCHING OF A WORLD S LARGE RIVERS INITIATIVE (WLRI)

The river a source of life

COMPLIANCE REPORT ASSESSING APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 11 b (6) OF EMISSIONS TRADING DIRECTIVE TO HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT ACTIVITIES EXCEEDING 20 MW

Participatory Watershed Governance Water Sustainability at Scale through Inclusive Approaches

our Water A Watershed and Aquifer Planning Model for Saskatchewan

ASSESSMENT OF FRESH WATER ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE HYDROPOWER SECTOR IN MOUNTAIN REGIONS OF AZERBAIJAN

Downstream Flow Regimes

Module 2: DPSIR Overview. This Module will provide and overview of the DPSIR framework, and examples from case studies in which it has been used.

SURVEY OF PUBLIC ATTITUDES ABOUT WATER ISSUES IN COLORADO

Exemptions according to Article 4(4) due to natural conditions: the case study of Lake Viverone (Italy)

Report about round tables for the pilot areas Mis and Maè Valley

The Blueprint and Council Conclusions:

Initiative Place a Stone in a Stream as a Method for Local Stakeholder Motivation and Involvement in River Restoration and Maintanance in Latvia

Big Sky Sustainable Water Solutions Forum Community Survey August - September 2017

1st Living Lakes Webinar

Exploration of water management adaptation strategies in the context of climatic changes in the Alps using a modelling tool

Ministerial Declaration --- Message from the Lake Biwa and Yodo River Basin---

UPPER LEMPA RIVER BASIN GUATEMALA, HONDURAS, EL SALVADOR. Raul Artiga Secretariat of Territorial Development and Decentralisation. El Salvador.

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes

European Lakes Under Environmental Stressors The effects of Climate Change on European Lakes EULAKES Project: from knowledge to possible actions

Kazbegi Municipality LOCAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY Kazbegi Local Action Group

GENDER MAINSTREAMING STRATEGY AND ACTION PLAN. Introduction to project

Kanpur Comprehensive Water Management Plan

Fresh Water 4/20/2009. Chapter 7. Earth s Water Resources. Chapter 7: Outline

7 th World Water Forum

High-level political forum on sustainable development

Stormwater flooding. Climate Resilience Express Action Kit. Increase in the number of extreme precipitation events. Stormwater flooding (recurring)

NCA and ESA and the water sector

Alpine Convention. Rudolf HORNICH Styrian Federal State Government Watermanagement, Ressources and Sustainability

DECLARATION. Sustainable Land Use and Soil Protection Joining Forces for Nature, People and the Economy

Proactivity and responsible operating methods. City of Tampere environmental policy 2020

Integrated Management of the Transboundary Prespa Lake Basin: Experiences, Achievements and Challenges. Dimitrija Sekovski, UNDP Project Manager

Adapting to Climate Change in Kimberley, BC. Executive Summary June Prepared by Ingrid Liepa

Strategic Initiative on Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation, and Development in Mountain Regions. Presentation of the Position Paper.

Abstract. Key words Water resources management, ethics, Rhône and Mediterranean Basin

Mohawk River Basin Research Initiative

Mediterranean Mountains: Climate Change, Landscape and Biodiversity

REGIONAL RIVER BASIN CONSULTATIONS 2 ND AG MEETING FRIDAY, 13 TH JANUARY, 2017 DR. LWIN LWIN WAI

Charter: Great Lakes Region Aquatic Habitat Connectivity Collaborative

September 2016 ID Competency Statement Type

Summary of the Intervention of the Water Program of IANAS in the 8 th World Water Forum Brasilia, Brazil, March 21, 2018

Case Study: City of Nagoya, Japan

Policy on Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Himachal Pradesh

Confluence Field Station

Human Impact on Water

Workshop on ASSESSING THE WATER-FOOD-ENERGY- ECOSYSTEMS NEXUS AND BENEFITS OF TRANSBOUNDARY COOPERATION IN THE DRINA RIVER BASIN

A Conservation programme for Bolgoda Wetland Complex

Functions and values of water. Cor de Jong WaterLand International, Wageningen

Introduction Rob Bugter. Effectiveness Pekka Jokinen

Stockholm s Green Wedges Concepts, learning and collaboration on urban and peri-urban forestry

Water Security Agency. Plan for saskatchewan.ca

Water, Energy and Food Security Nexus to Cope with the Climate Change

EU Environmental Legislation and Sediment Transport

The Elbe River Basin: Preliminary evaluation of the answers. Janos J. Bogardi Executive Officer of GWSP

International Hydrological Programme REVISED PROPOSAL FOR THE LAUNCHING OF A WORLD S LARGE RIVERS INITIATIVE (WLRI)

Concepts and challenges of adaptation to climate change

Strategic Plan. Grand River Conservation Authority

Report to the Board of the Upper Gunnison River Water Conservation District from the Ad Hoc Committee on Watershed Management Planning

SECTION 3: Water, Wetlands and Waterways

Environmental Evidence for the Future Initiative. Summary Report of Call for Evidence 2018

A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE. Enhancing Resilience to Climate Change in Newfoundland and Labrador

LINKAGES BETWEEN WOMEN, LIVELIHOODS & ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY

Climate change: a super-wicked problem

27 29 January Washington DC - USA

Colorado State University. Food Systems Report

Fresh Water Treaty. International Setting and Issues in Water, Environment and Development

SWOT ANALYSIS on WATER MANAGEMENT in ANTHEMOUNTAS PILOT RIVER BASIN

ILBM (Integrated Lake Basin Management )

Career Pathway: Scientific

Cannon River One Watershed, One Plan. POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING January 10, 2018 Rice County Government Center Faribault, MN

Dam removal on the Sélune River (France): Implementation of the ecological restoration project

View on Usability of EFSA Outputs. Annette Toft, chair of Copa and Cogeca s working party on Food 30 May 2017, EFSA Stakeholders Forum

UN-GGIM: Europe Work Group A «Core Data» SDG related use cases

BMZ Strategy for Interlinkages 1 between Water, the Environment and Climate Change

Hydro power plant Bodendorf Pilot case study area of PP6 (TUG)

INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HARMONISING ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS WITH SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF RIVER BASINS.

Urban River Management in Japan

MINISTÈRE DES AFFAIRES ÉTRANGÈRES ET EUROPÉENNES 20 December /5 6th World Water Forum Ministerial Process Draft document

CONCLUSIONS OF THE PRESIDENCY OF THE INTERNATIONAL SUMMIT OF ROME ON WATER AND CLIMATE

CONFERENCE SCHEDULE IN BRIEF

Living River Liesing. Is rehabilitation of a heavily modified waterbody in an urban environment possible? Dr. Ulrike Goldschmid MA 45 Wasserbau

Sabie River Basin, South Africa. Integrated River Basin Management by Gutewelt & Partner Katharina Schulthess & Lara Widmer June 2016

After-LIFE Communication Plan EcoQuarry

Building strategic partnerships to enhance urban resilience Partnership between Bonn and La Paz

Bragança Declaration «Face the challenge of climate change: adaptation for future generations»

Eutrophication Control and Coordinated Development of Society-Economy-Environment

CYPRUS NATIONAL REPORT

SOURCE - where the river begins. The source can be: a glacier, melting. snow, a lake or a spring SPRING - a place where water comes out of the ground

Attitudes of Nebraska Residents on Nebraska Water Management

Transcription:

PILOT CASE STUDY WHICH PARTICIPATION FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE DORA BALTEA RIVER AND ITS TRIBUTARIES? MAY 2017

SHORT INTRODUCTION SURVEY IN THE PILOT CASE STUDY This report aims at collecting the views of residents, Results of this survey will help the preparation of the stakeholders via the PTA newsletter coupled to local The present report is an articulate wrap up of survey associations, private companies and all other actors subsequent phases of the project in which these River Management Planning revision process activities. replies to put in evidence PCS perception of river and about the management and the protection of the actors will be actively involved in identifying future Finally, more than 700 persons have received the related issues by stakeholders and local communities. Dora Baltea river. actions and management plans for the river. survey and been asked to forward it to their own networks. Replies have been analyzed one by one and, The report is framed on WPT1 PCS 6 large scale local The survey was open to ALL and anonymous, whether when possible, depicted in a visual way to ease individual pre-assessment / survey: for each PCS, a or not residing near the Dora Baltea river, and whether A second launch of the survey has been done in April comprehension of river context. large scale public survey on river perception, issues, or not knowledgeable about water management. 2017 by WhatsApp social network. At the beginning of governance, proposals has been disseminated. In December 2016 PCS 6 questionnaire was sent to May 2017, when the access to the survey was closed, general public and an extensive range of potential only 77 answers were received.

SPORT MUDDY MOUNTAIN RIVER ROCKS WHAT ARE THE THREE KEYWORDS WHICH BEST REPRESENT THE DORA BALTEA RIVER AND ITS TRIBUTARIES? Dora Baltea river and its streams are a source of life and of energy. This essential resource, with typical characteristics of mountain areas, is even used for fishing and sport, but its natural state is affected and thus its ecosystem must be protected. FISHING ENERGY SOURCE BALANCE CLEAN FRESHNESS GLACIERS ARTIFICIAL WORKS VALLE D AOSTA SILTIMPETUOSITY GREEN WATER IRRIGATION & AGRICULTURE ALPS STREAMS SOURCE OF LIFE UTILITY VERY FREQUENT FREQUENT NOT FREQUENT

RIVER BASIN RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN DO YOU KNOW THE FOLLOWING TERMS? Almost everybody knows the meaning of the term Hydropower energy, but also the knowledge of the words River basin, River Basin Management Plan, and River vulnerability is spread. Instead, many persons have never heard the term Water Framework Directive, and several do not know the meaning of Ecosystem services, Ecological continuity, and River integrated management. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES HYDROPOWER ENERGY ECOLOGICAL CONTINUITY RIVER INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE RIVER VULNERABILITY I KNOW THE MEANING OF THE WORD AND I CAN EXPLAIN IT TO SOMEONE I KNOW THE MEANING OF THE WORD I HAVE ALREADY HEARD THIS WORD BUT I DO NOT KNOW ITS MEANING I HAVE NEVER HEARD THIS WORD

IT PROVIDES OUR DRINKING WATER FOR EACH OF THE FOLLOWING SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE RIVERS, HOW IMPORTANT IS IT FOR YOU? Dora Baltea river and its tributaries are everyone s heritage and they are vital for nature, biodiversity and agriculture. The majority of the sample assumes that rivers provide drinking water for local communities, even if it is false because, in the basin, drinkable water is provided only by underground aquifers. IT IS USEFUL FOR AGRICULTURE IT ALLOWS THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE TERRITORY IT CONTRIBUTES TO GET RID OF WASTE AND POLLUTANTS IT PROVIDES ENERGY IT IS A RESOURCE FOR TOURISM IT IS A RESOURCE FOR LANDSCAPE IT IS USEFUL FOR RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES IT IS VITAL FOR NATURE, BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEMS THE RIVER IS EVERYONE S HERITAGE IT HAS A SPIRITUAL / SYMBOLIC / RELIGIOUS VALUE OTHER PRIORITY IMPORTANT SECONDARY NOT IMPORTANT

WHICH ACTIONS YOU WOULD SUGGEST TO IMPLEMENT FOR THE SERVICES WHICH YOU HAVE LISTED ABOVE AS PRIORITIES: Restoration of artificialized stream sections and banks and cleaning of the riverbed are the main actions that should be implemented. Hydropower exploitation and other anthropic pressures should be controlled and the sewage treatment network should be completed, promoting the river water and banks for recreational and sport activities. RECREATIONAL PATHS ALONG THE STREAMS / CONTROLLING THE SEDIMENT LOAD IN THE WATER / RESTORATION OF ARTIFICIALIZED STREAM SECTIONS AND RIVER BANKS / INTRODUCING PROTECTED AREAS AND TOURIST / DECREASING THE ANTHROPIC PRESSURE / CLEANING AND MAINTENANCE OF RIVERBED AND RIVER BANKS / IMPROVING AND PROMOTING FISHING / RESTORING WATER CONTINUITY / RESTOCKING THE STREAMS / COMPLETING AND MONITORING THE SEWAGE TREATMENT NETWORK / AVOIDING THE INTRODUCTION OF FISHES BY FISHERMEN ASSOCIATION REDUCING THE IMPACT OF HUMAN ACTIVITIES AND ARRANGEMENTS IN THE STREAMS / RESTORING THE RIVER MEANDERING / MAKING AVAILABLE THE RIVER BANKS WITH PATHS, CYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PATHS / COMPLETING AND MORE PROMOTING THE BIKE PATH ALONG DORA BALTEA RIVER / RESTORING THE RIVER MEANDERING / REDUCING THE IMPACT OF HUMAN ACTIVITIES AND ARRANGEMENTS IN THE STREAMS / DECREASING THE ANTHROPIC PRESSURE / REDUCING THE IMPACT OF HUMAN ACTIVITIES AND ARRANGEMENTS IN THE STREAMS / DECREASING HYDROPOWER EXPLOITATION / GIVE 100% OF THE HYDROPOWER PLANTS OWNERSHIP TO LOCAL COMMUNITIES VERY FREQUENT FREQUENT NOT FREQUENT

WHAT ARE THE EVENTS WHICH HAVE MOST IMPACTED THE DORA BALTEA RIVER IN THE PAST? Dora Baltea river and its streams were impacted, in the past, by both anthropic and natural events, in particular hydropower exploitation and dramatic floods. Even artificialization and channeling of watercourses, sediment mining and the lack of wastewater treatment plants generate considerable impacts. POLLUTION / RIVER EXPLOITATION FOR HYDROPOWER PRODUCTION DEFORESTATION ON THE RIVER BANKS / CHANNELING OF WATERCOURSES / MEASURES IMPLEMENTED AFTER THE FLOODS FLOODS IN THE PAST / CHANNELING OF THE RU / CHANGES AND ARTIFICIALIZATION OF THE RIVERBED / BAD MANAGEMENT OF FISHERY SEDIMENT MINING / URBANIZATION OF SOME AREAS / LACK OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS / HYDRAULIC WORKS AGRICULTURE WITHDRAWALS / FLOOD IN 2000 / CONSTRUCTION OF THE MOTORWAY RIVER BANKS ARTIFICIALIZATION / POOR MAINTENANCE OF THE RU VERY FREQUENT FREQUENT NOT FREQUENT

38% 73% 73% 40% 91% WHO SHOULD PARTICIPATE IN DESCRIBING THE CURRENT SITUATION OF THE RIVER? The current situation of the river should be described mainly by experts, consultants and scientists. However, even public administrators, managers or authorities, citizens and farmers should be involved. POLICY-MAKERS, ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONS, MANAGERS, AUTHORITIES CITIZENS, INHABITANTS, USERS, ASSOCIATIONS FARMERS, INDUSTRIES, BUSINESSES, PROFESSIONALS EXPERTS, CONSULTANTS, SCIENTISTS

36% 76% 62% 49% 87% WHO SHOULD PARTICIPATE IN IDENTIFYING ACTION PLANS FOR THE RIVER? Action plans for the river should be identified mainly by experts, consultants and scientists. However, even public administrators, managers or authorities, citizens and farmers should be involved. POLICY-MAKERS, ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONS, MANAGERS, AUTHORITIES CITIZENS, INHABITANTS, USERS, ASSOCIATIONS FARMERS, INDUSTRIES, BUSINESSES, PROFESSIONALS EXPERTS, CONSULTANTS, SCIENTISTS

47% 79% 51% 32% 90% WHO SHOULD PARTICIPATE IN IMPLEMENTING SELECTED ACTION PLANS OR POLICIES? Selected action plans or policies for the river should be implemented mainly by experts, consultants and scientists. However, even public administrators, managers or authorities should be involved, but also citizens, inhabitants, users or associations, policymakers and representatives. POLICY-MAKERS, ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONS, MANAGERS, AUTHORITIES CITIZENS, INHABITANTS, USERS, ASSOCIATIONS FARMERS, INDUSTRIES, BUSINESSES, PROFESSIONALS EXPERTS, CONSULTANTS, SCIENTISTS

WHAT ARE YOUR SUGGESTIONS TO THE SURVEY ABOUT THE MEANS TO INVOLVE CITIZENS ARE LISTED IN THE PROPOSALS BELOW: POSTERS AND ADVERTISING EVENTS INVOLVING CITIZENS & STAKEHOLDERS DIRECT MEETINGS Main suggestions about other actors to be involved for the Dora Baltea river management concern young INTERNET / SOCIAL MEDIA / FORUM ONLINE people involvement, fishermen, municipalities, or simply all the interested citizens. The preferred ways of participation are Internet and face-to-face meetings. INTERNET / SOCIAL MEDIA / FORUM ONLINE DIRECT MEETINGS EVENTS INVOLVING CITIZENS & STAKEHOLDERS RIVER CLEANING DAY POSTERS AND ADVERTISING

ABOUT YOU SURVEY SAMPLE INFORMATION YOUR AGE Participation to the questionnaire is represented mainly by persons aged between 41 and 50 years. Few respondents are more than 60 years or less than 31 years old. 12% 34% 45% 26% 7% UNDER 31 YEARS OLD 31-40 YEARS OLD 41-50 YEARS OLD 51-60 YEARS OLD MORE THAN 60 YEARS OLD

ABOUT YOU SURVEY SAMPLE INFORMATION GENDER Participation to the questionnaire is well represented by both the genders, even if males prevail. 57% %43% MALE FEMALE

WHAT IS YOUR PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITY? Participants to the survey are mainly workers and employees. Fewer respondents have a liberal profession, and only small percentages are represented by teachers or professors, engineers or architects, and retired or unemployed persons. 20% 1% 63% 7% 3% 7% SENIOR OR TECHNICAL EXECUTIVE LIBERAL PROFESSION / ENGINEER CRAFTSMAN / SHOPKEEPER SMALL BUSINESS HOLDER WORKER / EMPLOYEE TEACHER / PROFESSOR STUDENT RETIRED / UNEMPLOYED

4% MUNICIPALITIES EXTERNAL TO VALLE D AOSTA IN WHICH MUNICIPALITY DO YOU LIVE? 50% 11% MOUNTAIN MUNICIPALITIES OTHER MUNICIPALITIES IN THE PLAINE Participation to the survey is mainly represented by persons living in Aosta town or in other municipalities in the Plaine. Least respondents to the survey are resident in mountain municipalities or in other regions. 35% AOSTA AOSTA OTHER MUNICIPALITIES IN THE PLAINE MOUNTAIN MUNICIPALITIES MUNICIPALITIES EXTERNAL TO VALLE D AOSTA

73% HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN LIVING IN THE TERRITORY OF THE DORA BALTEA RIVER? The majority of participants to the survey have been living in the territory of the Dora Baltea river for more than 30 years. Other respondents live in the region from a shorter period, often between 15 and 30 years. 16% 5% 3% 1% 1% MORE THAN 30 YEARS BETWEEN 15 AND 30 YEARS BETWEEN 5 AND 14 YEARS BETWEEN 1 AND 4 YEARS LESS THAN A YEAR, I ARRIVED RECENTLY I DO NOT LIVE ALONG THE DORA BALTEA RIVER

HAVE YOU EVER PARTICIPATED IN ONE OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES? Most of the participants to the survey have already taken part to visits, explorations, or field workshops, but also to administrative meetings and information meetings. Another frequent way of participation is represented by surveys and data collection and monitoring. VISITS, EXPLORATIONS, FIELD WORKSHOPS (e.g. nature or river festivals) ADMINISTRATIVE MEETINGS OR GATHERINGS, BOARDS, RIVER COMMITTEES / INFORMATION MEETING ON THE RIVER, ITS USES, ITS STAKES AND ITS MANAGEMENT / PAPER OR ONLINE SURVEY OR QUESTIONNAIRE / INFORMATION OR DATA COLLECTION, MONITORING, INVENTORIES / CONSULTATION WHERE YOU COULD MAKE PROPOSALS / DIRECT INTERVENTION (e.g. riverbank cleanups) DISCUSSION OR NEGOTIATION ON WATER DISTRIBUTION, POLLUTION OR WITHDRAWAL / PUBLIC ENQUIRY ON RIVER-RELATED MATTERS / RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN (e.g. droughts, floods) / OTHERS MORE THAN 60 % MORE THAN 50 % MORE THAN 40 % MORE THAN 30 % MORE THAN 20 % MORE THAN 10 %

20% WOULD YOU LIKE TO PARTICIPATE IN FURTHER REFLECTIONS AND WORK FOR A BETTER MANAGEMENT OF THE RIVER? Most of respondents to the survey are interested in participating in further reflections and works for a better management of the Dora Baltea river, mainly by Internet and mail, and even taking part to meetings and making proposals. 35% 16% 15% 13% 1% NO, THANKS I WOULD LIKE TO BE INFORMED I WOULD LIKE TO PARTICIPATE DISTANTLY, BY INTERNET OR MAIL I WOULD LIKE TO BE PRESENT IN MEETINGS I WOULD LIKE TO ACTIVELY PARTICIPATE IN MEETINGS AND MAKE PROPOSALS OTHERS

INFO & CONTACTS Andrea MAMMOLITI MOCHET ARPA Valle d Aosta a.mammolitimochet@arpa.vda.it Susanne MUHAR University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU) susanne.muhar@boku.ac.at Copyright ARPA / RAVA The information contained in this report is subject to change without notice and should not be construed as a commitment by any members of the Share Consortium. The Share Consortium assumes no responsibility for the use or inability to use any procedure, protocol, software or algorithms, which might be described in this report. The information is provided without any warranty of any kind and the Share Consortium expressly disclaims all implied warranties, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular use. The responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors; it does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Community. The European Regional Development Fund is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained herein. The information contained is given for information purposes only and does not legally bind any of the parties involved. DOCUMENT CONTROL PROJECT SPARE- Strategic Planning for Alpine Rivers Ecosystems ACTION WPT3 action 4.1 DELIVERABLE WPT3 deliverables 4.1.3 DISSEMINATION Public ORIGIN ARPA VDA AUTHORS Andrea Mammoliti Mochet, a.mammolitimochet@arpa.vda.it Erica Vassoney, erica.vassoney@polito.it