Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installations Standards Manual

Similar documents
Design Example Residential Subdivision

Results shown on 'Detailed Summary' tab

Appendix A. Compliance Calculator Guidance

Pre-Treatment Bioretention Cells Bioswales IOWA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL DECEMBER 16, 2015

Example 1: Pond Design in a residential development (Water Quantity calculations for a Wet Pond and Wet Extended Detention Pond)

9220 Wightman Road, Suite 120 Montgomery Village, Maryland Phone Fax

The Vermont Stormwater Management Manual

Appendix C.1. Design Example 1 Shallow Wetland (W-1)

Applying the Water Quality Volume

Design of Stormwater Wetlands

CHAPTER 3 Water Quality Standards

Case Study No. 3: Waterfront Drive,

CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP Chapter 290: WATERSHED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Article IV: Stormwater Management

Decatur, Georgia Stormwater Management Policy Guidelines. DRAFT November 5, 2014

4.4.9 Sand Filter. Estimated Pollutant Removal Efficiency Rates Description and Benefits

August Chapter 1: Introduction to the Manual

Stormwater Management Impacts Resulting from the Volumetric Abstraction of Runoff from Frequent Storms per PADEP CG-1. Geoffrey A. Cerrelli 1, P.E.

Peak discharge computation

HYDROLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS. 22 nd Annual Nonpoint Source Pollution Conference Saratoga Springs, NY

CHAPTER 4 - EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE OF DUBUQUE COUNTY, IOWA. Adopted March 29, 2010.

Shelbyville, Kentucky Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) Stormwater Pollution Treatment Practices (Structural) DRAFT

Modeling Infiltration BMPs

Introduction Hydrologic Analysis Existing Site Description

RETENTION BASIN EXAMPLE

March 9, 09 Syracuse, NY

OHIO S NPDES STORMWATER GENERAL PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES OHC Justin Reinhart, PE Division of Surface Water

4.4.6 Underground Detention

3.3 Acceptable Downstream Conditions

CRITERIA FOR STORMWATER DESIGN

APPENDIX IV. APPROVED METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF CONCERN (NORTH ORANGE COUNTY)

BMP Design Aids. w w w. t r a n s p o r t a t i o n. o h i o. g o v. Equations / Programs

Drainage Analysis. Appendix E

APPENDIX C - FACILITY SIZING CALCULATIONS

Enhanced Phosphorus Removal Standards d Workshop

Design Example Handouts. DURANGO DETENTION WORKBOOK LUNCH AND LEARN CITY OF DURANGO Meeting Date: February 7, 2017

Stormwater Review Part 2. Rainfall and Runoff. Tom Seybert, PE and Andy Bennett, PE. Pennsylvania Surveyors Conference 2019

4.28 Underground Detention

Building Resilience to Flooding and Climate Change in the Moonlight Brook Watershed

E. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GREENE COUNTY ASH POND ALABMA POWER COMPANY

Redevelopment Introduction

How Climate Change Impacts Urban Runoff and Water Quality Design

Hydrologic Study Report for Single Lot Detention Basin Analysis

Matt Lundsted Principal Comprehensive Environmental Inc.

CCSD#1 Stormwater Standards

STORMWATER RUNOFF AND WATER QUALITY IMPACT REVIEW

Chapter 12. VIRGINIA RUNOFF REDUCTION METHOD Compliance Spreadsheet User s Guide & Documentation (Version 2.7, April 2013) Table of Contents

STORMWATER HYDROLOGY

Appendix B. Storm Drain System Data

Chapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT NEWCASTLE FIRE STATION OLD STATE HIGHWAY

Basic Hydrology Runoff Curve Numbers

Georgia s Unified Stormwater Sizing Criteria The Old, the New, and the Misunderstood

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 3 (AP-3) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Maintain grass or vegetative cover as appropriate for the selected vegetation.

Local Stormwater Design Manual. City of Fairburn

HMP 101 Hydromodification Management Plan for Santa Clara Valley Guidance for Local Implementation

Extended Detention Basin Design

HYDROLOGY CHECKLIST FOR LAND DISTURBANCE PERMITS

June 27, 2012 Holly Galavotti U.S. EPA

4.27 Submerged Gravel Wetlands

Concurrent Session B: LID Design Specifications (Chapter 4 in Draft Manual)

Preliminary Stormwater Quality Mitigation Report

Grass Channel KEY CONSIDERATIONS STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUITABILITY FEASIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS OTHER CONSIDERATIONS POLLUTANT REMOVAL

Project Drainage Report

Chapter 3 Calculating the WQCV and Volume Reduction

State Standard. for. Stormwater Detention/Retention

APPENDIX E Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan By: McLaren Engineering Group February 2009

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. Part PLANT MCINTOSH ASH POND 1 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Hydrology for Drainage Design. Design Considerations Use appropriate design tools for the job at hand:

SECTION IV WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Green Infrastructure. Jesse Schomberg University of Minnesota Sea Grant Program

Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. Chapter 3. Stormwater Management Principles and Recommended Control Guidelines

SECTION 4 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS

LDS Technical Guidance

Chapter Introduction. 5.2 Computational Standard Methods HYDROLOGY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GASTON GYPSUM POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

Appendix A Watershed Modeling Technical Data

Creating a Sustainable Future at Penn State

Stormwater Management Update Requirements for Plans and Approvals. Doug Beisch (WEG, now Stantec)

Phase II: Proposed (regulated) Impervious in disturbed area (ac) Long Lake Existing Impervious in disturbed area (ac)

CRS Activity 450: Stormwater Management

4.2 Cherry Creek & Stillhouse Branch

CHAPTER 3 STORMWATER HYDROLOGY. Table of Contents SECTION 3.1 METHODS FOR ESTIMATING STORMWATER RUNOFF

POST-CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER

Santa Margarita Region of Riverside County

Permeable Pavement Hydrologic Modeling

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY

Environmental Design Group

Stormwater Management Studies PDS Engineering Services Division ES Policy # 3-01

Sump Pumps Office procedures for the Drainage & Grading section

CHAPTER 1 DESIGN MANUAL OVERVIEW

City of Katy Flood Protection Study (Meeting 3 of 3) October 23, 2017

New Castle County, DE. Floodplain Regulations

Stormwater Local Design Manual For Houston County, Georgia

IBS Site Drainage: Senior Design Project

Rational Method Hydrological Calculations with Excel COURSE CONTENT

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

CROSBY BROOK RESTORATION STUDY BRATTLEBORO, VT

Warner Robins Stormwater Local Design Manual

Transcription:

Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installations Standards Manual Public Workshop Required Management Volume Calculations and Redevelopment Considerations March 22, 2011

Presentation Outline Recap of How to Use the Manual Required Management Volume Calculations Recharge, Re Water Quality Volume, WQv Minimum WQv WQf vs. WQv and Flow Splitting Use of Modified CN Channel Protection Volume, CPv Overbank Flood Protection, Qp Redevelopment Considerations Sample Calcs

Steps to Designing an Approvable Stormwater System

Step 3 What volume requirements must be met? (Re v, WQ v, CP v, Q p ) These requirements will help determine what type of BMPs are needed at a site

Recharge Criteria, Rev Requires that the following volume of stormwater be recharged: Re v = (1 ) (F) (I) / 12 where: Re v = recharge volume (in acre-feet) I = impervious area in acres HSG Recharge Factor (F) A 0.60 B 0.35 C 0.25 D 0.10

Recharge Volume Considered as part of WQ v Can be achieved by Disconnection of impervious areas (LID Credit) Structural Practice (Table 3-5) Combination of the two Should be provided in each applicable drainage area where imp. cover is proposed. Must verify that recharge volume actually reaches BMP. Recharged roof runoff can be subtracted from WQv but not from Cp v and Q p unless drywells sized properly. Exemptions: runoff from LUHPPLs, for some extreme physical site limitations.

Water Quality Criteria, WQ v The WQ v is calculated using the following equation: WQv =(1 ) (I) / 12 where: WQv = water quality volume (in acre-feet) I = impervious area in acres

Can be achieved by: Water Quality Volume Disconnection of impervious areas (LID Credit) Structural Practice (Table 3-6) Combination of the two Imp. cover measured from site plan (for entire site); Only on-site treatment is required but off-site flow must be accounted for if draining to a BMP

Minimum WQv A minimum WQv value of 0.2 watershed inches (0.2 over the entire disturbed area) is required. Requires calculation of total site disturbance. Necessary to fully treat runoff from pervious surfaces on sites with low impervious cover (i.e., less than 20% of disturbed area). Does not imply that every pervious subarea of disturbance must be treated with a structural water quality BMP. Ensures that developments such as golf courses with low impervious areas receive the appropriate treatment for their stormwater runoff.

Min WQv Sample Calculation Base Data: I = 4 acres; disturbed area = 10 acres WQ v = (1.0 )(I)/12 = 1.0 (4.0 ac)/12 = 0.33 ac-ft (14,375 ft 3 ) Check WQ v > minimum req d 0.2 for disturbed area (10 acres); WQ v min = 0.2 (10 ac)/12 = 0.17 ac-ft; which is less than the computed value, so use 0.33 ac-ft.

Offline vs. Online Designs WQ treatment practices can be either on or offline. On-line facilities are generally sized to receive, but not necessarily treat, larger storms. Off-line facilities are designed to receive a certain flow rate through a weir, channel, manhole flow splitter, etc.

PLAN VIEW PLAN VIEW OFF-LINE SECTION ON-LINE SECTION

Swales On-Line

On-Line

Flow Diversion Structure To Water Quality Facility Bypass Pipe

WQ f vs. WQ v Standard 3 is volume-based. Why would a corresponding WQ flow be necessary? To ensure that the full WQ v reaches an off-line BMP Some proprietary devices are flow-based A Modified Curve Number (CN) is needed: Traditional TR-55 CNs can lead to significantly underestimated runoff from small storm events Used to calculate WQ f Used to correctly model the WQ event

Design Example #2, App. D Impervious area (I) = 2.5 acres; WQv = (1.0 )(I)/12 = 1.0 (2.5 ac)/12 WQv = 0.21 ac-ft

Diversion Str. Off-Line

Section 3.3.3.2 - Water Quality Peak Flow Calculation Using the WQv, a corresponding modified CN is computed utilizing the following equation: CN = 1000 / [10 + 5P +10Q - 10(Q² + 1.25 Q*P) ½ ] Where: P = rainfall, in inches (use 1.2 inches) Q = runoff volume, in inches (equal to WQv area) Q = (0.21 ac-ft) (12 inches/ft) / (3.0 acres) = 0.84 inches CN = 1000 / [10 + 5(1.2 in) +10 (0.84 in) - 10((0.84 in)² + 1.25 (0.84 in)(1.2 in)) ½ ] CN = 1000 / [10 + 6.0 + 8.4 14.02] = 96.3 **Use this in either H/H model with a 1.2 precip event, or use TR-55 spreadsheet, to find WQ f

Exhibit 4-III Unit peak discharge (q u ) for NRCS Type III rainfall distribution q u = 660 csm/in Ia for CN of 96.3 is 0.077 [Ia = (200/CN - 2)] Ia/P = (0.077)/1.2 = 0.064 t c = 0.10 hours

Compute Peak Discharge (Q peak ) Where: Q peak = q u * A * WQ v Q peak = the peak discharge, in cfs q u = the unit peak discharge, in cfs/mi²/inch (660 csm/in) A = drainage area, in square miles (0.0047 sq miles) WQ v = Water Quality Volume, in watershed inches (0.84 inches) Q peak = 660 * 0.0047 * 0.84 = 2.61 cfs **Good rule of thumb is about 1.1 cfs/acre of imp. cover

Use orifice eqtn to size pipe/orifice Q peak = CA(2gh) 1/2 where: C = discharge coefficient (0.6) A = cross-section area of orifice (D 2 /4*п) g = acceleration due to gravity (32.2 ft/s 2 ) h = head, height above center of the orifice (assume 2 ft) A = Q peak / [C*(2gh) 1/2 ] = 2.61 cfs/ [0.6*(2*32.2ft/s 2 * 2ft) 1/2 ] = 0.38 ft 2 Diameter = [(0.38 ft 2 )*4/π ] 1/2 = 0.7ft (12in/ft) = 8.4 in Use 10-in pipe (conservative up-sizing)

Channel Protection Criteria, Cp v Channel protection must be supplied by providing 24-hour ED for the one-year 24-hour design storm event. CPv computed using methodology in App H.4 or by calculating 65% of the runoff volume from the postdevelopment 1-year, 24-hour Type III storm: where Vs = Cp v ; and Vs = 0.65 * Vr Vr = runoff volume from 1-year, 24-hour Type III storm. CPv released at roughly a uniform rate: Average release rate = Vr / T where Vr = defined above; and T = extended detention time (24 hours).

Updated Precipitation Values RI County 24-hour (Type III) Rainfall Amount (inches) 1-Year 2-Year 5-Year 10-Year 25-Year 50-Year 100-Year Providence 2.7 3.3 4.1 4.9 6.1 7.3 8.7 Newport 2.8 3.3 4.1 4.9 6.1 7.3 8.6 Bristol 2.8 3.3 4.1 4.9 6.1 7.3 8.6 Kent 2.7 3.3 4.1 4.8 6.2 7.3 8.7 Washington 2.8 3.3 4.1 4.9 6.1 7.2 8.5

Hydrologic Basis for Design TR-55 or TR-20 (or equiv) used for determining peak discharge; Off-site areas modeled as present condition ; Length of overland flow used in t c limited to 100 for post-developed conditions; Cp v not required for: discharges to a large river (i.e., 4 th -order stream), surface water body > 50 acres (lake, pond reservoirs), estuary, or tidal waters. small sites with impervious cover 1 acre Sites where peak flow < 2 cfs

Overbank Flood Protection, Q p Downstream overbank flood protection must be provided by controlling the post-development peak discharge rate to the pre-development rate for the 10-year and 100- year, 24-hour design storm events. The Q p criteria can be waived for sites that: Discharge to a large river (i.e., 4th order stream), surface water body > 50 acres (lake, pond reservoirs), estuary, or tidal waters. A downstream analysis indicates that peak discharge control is not necessary.

Hydrologic Basis for Design TR-55 or TR-20 used for determining peak discharge; Pre-developed conditions for on-site areas will be woods, meadow, or rangeland in good condition; Off-site areas modeled as present condition for storage requirements; Where off-site areas drain to a facility, must demonstrate safe passage of 100-year storm based on actual conditions upstream; Length of overland flow used in time of concentration limited to 150 for pre-developed conditions and 100 for post-developed conditions; and Must demonstrate that flows from the 100-yr event will be safely conveyed to a practice.

Redevelopment Redevelopment is defined as any construction, alteration, or improvement that disturbs a total of 10,000 square feet or more of existing impervious area where the existing land use is commercial, industrial, institutional, governmental, recreational, or multifamily residential. Redevelopment sites with less than 40%* impervious coverage must meet new development criteria, except that it can be met either on-site or at approved off-site location in same watershed, if on-site was explored to MEP. For sites 40%*, only standards 2, 3, and 7-11 must be addressed, on-site or at approved off-site location. *Jurisdictional wetland areas and conservation easements are subtracted from total site area for this calculation.

Redevelopment 40% imp. cover Reduce existing impervious area by at least 50%; or Use LID techniques for at least 50% of area; or Use BMPs (Chapt. 3) to provide recharge and water quality management for at least 50% of area; or Any combination of impervious area reduction, other LID techniques, or BMPs for at least 50% of area. *If none of the above are feasible, alternatives may be proposed that achieve an equiv. pollutant reduction (e.g., treating 100% of redev. area by BMPs with lesser pollutant removal efficiency than stipulated in Standard 3).

Infill Development A development site that meets all of the following: Predominately pervious (<10,000 sq ft); Surrounded by existing development; Served by an existing network of infrastructure (no utility line extensions); and Site is 1 acre. Existing impervious area may be excluded from the stormwater management plan in most cases. Requirements for Stds 2 and 3 and 7-11, either on-site or at approved offsite location within same watershed. Must demonstrate compliance with Std 1 to MEP.

Sample Calculations Total Disturbed Area = 3.0 ac Impervious Area=1.56 ac The Sunshine Market is a hypothetical commercial development consisting of a fish and produce market. It is located in Charlestown, RI and discharges to Green Hill Pond. On-site soils are Windsor loamy sand (HSG A ).

Required Volume Calculations Compute required Re v based on A soils and Sect 3.3.2 Re v = [(1 ) (F) (I)] / 12 = [(1 ) (0.6) (1.56 ac)] (1ft/12in) = 0.08 ac-ft = ~3,500 cf Compute WQ v WQ v = [(1 ) (I)] / 12 = [(1 )(1.56 ac)] (1ft/12in) = 0.13 ac-ft = ~5,700 cf Min. WQ v = [(0.2 )(DA)] / 12 = [(0.2 )(3.0 ac)] (1ft/12in) = 0.05 ac-ft = ~2,200 cf Cp v and Q p are waived since site discharges to coastal waters with tide effects