The Economic Future of Nuclear Power

Similar documents
Electricity Markets. Rapid Conference May 17, Mike Rencheck Rencheck Consulting LLC

Fuel and Power Options

Uncertain Future CO 2 Pricing

Modeling Electric Generation and Uncertain Future CO 2 Pricing

Securing Our Energy Future. Susan N. Story

Managing Risk and Volatility in Gas-Fired Generation

Client Name/Presentation Title

The Economics of Small Modular Reactors

Referral # October 10, 2011

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 8

L A Z A R D ' S L E V E L I Z E D C O S T O F E N E R G Y A N A L Y S I S V E R S I O N 7. 0

Grid-Connected Renewable Energy

Availability and Costs of Supply-Side Electricity Options

The Economics of Nuclear Power. Steve Fetter University of Maryland

Eastern Trends: Modeling the Evolving Power Sector and Impacts of the Final Clean Power Plan

L.D. Carter For USCSC

Parabolic Trough Solar Technology for Utility Power Markets in the Southwestern United States

PUBLIC DOCUMENT NOT PUBLIC DATA

Will Low Natural Gas Prices Eliminate the Nuclear Option in the US?

Please see response to Question 9 for information related to final TVA resource estimates.

LAZARD'S LEVELIZED COST OF ENERGY ANALYSIS VERSION 10.0 DECEMBER 2016

The Cost of New Generating Capacity in Perspective

MEMORANDUM. April 29, Council Members. Charlie Black, Power Planning Division Director. SUBJECT: IHS Report on Columbia Generating Station

Driving Forces Behind Generation Fuel Mix In the Annual Energy Outlook 2006

Tax Policy Changes Affecting the Renewable Generation Industry

The State of the Wind Industry. Michael Skelly Clean Line Energy. March 2013

Policies that Support New Nuclear Power Plant Development

CHAPTER 4 KEY MODEL INPUTS

Financing Future Power Supply October 4, 2004 Peter Kind

The Optimal Approach to Firming Windpower

EXPANDING THE RENEWABLE PORTFOLIO STANDARD FOR MICHIGAN: A STUDY

EPA's Clean Power Plan: Evaluating State Compliance Plan Options

CO 2 Capture and Storage Economics and Technology

Contract For Biomass-Fueled Generation. Presentation to the Gainesville City Commission May 7, 2009

Welcome and Introductions

Emily Hammond Professor of Law The George Washington University May 8, 2015

General Session. Four Decades of Pursuing a Diversified Energy Portfolio at MIKE KOTARA. Senior Vice President

Beyond LCOE: The Value of CSP with Thermal Energy Storage

Cost-Benefit Analysis of the PSE&G Energy Efficiency Program 2014 Prospective

Challenges for the EU fossil fuel fleet

The Promise of Nuclear Technology

Comparative Costs of Geothermal, Solar, and Wind Generation Based on California Independent System Operator Electricity Market Data

Observations on US Renewable Energy Trends

La Plata Electric Workshop June 8, Brad Nebergall Senior Vice President

Distributed Generation

Energy Generation Planning in 2015 and 2025

THE FUTURE OF NUCLEAR POWER IN THE U.S. Paul L. Joskow. January 15, 2007

Combined Heat and Power (CHP): Applications of Distributed Power

Net Revenue. Overview Net Revenue. Conclusion. Historical New Entrant CT and CC Revenue Adequacy

Energy Economics Outlook for Space Solar. Gail Tverberg OurFiniteWorld.com December 15, 2015

ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT WORKING PAPER. Department of Economics Tufts University Medford, MA (617)

The consumer and societal benefits of wind energy in Texas

Third IEA IEF OPEC Symposium on Gas and Coal Market Outlooks. Tim Gould, IEA

Where Are the Deals Going to Happen and Why? Midland CO 2 Conference December 3, 2018 Jeff Brown

The economic benefits of wind energy in the Southwest Power Pool

Seventh Plan Midterm Assessment: Draft Resource Capital Cost Estimates for Wind and Solar. Reminder: How the Council develops capital cost estimates

Risk Sharing Under Renewable Portfolio Standards. Becky A. Lafrancois PhD Candidate, Department of Economics Syracuse University June 23, 2009

i

The Implications of Lower Natural Gas Prices for the Electric Generation Mix in the Southeast 1

Energy Costs for Water Suppliers: Prospects and Options

2017 IRP Update. Proposed Long Term Resource Strategy Proposed Conservation

The Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) Interconnection Queue has over 8,444 MW of projects for Michigan.

ELECTRICITY TRADE AGREEMENT. An Assessment of the Ontario-Quebec Electricity Trade Agreement

MEASURING RENEWABLE ENERGY AS BASELOAD POWER

Wood Pellets How a simple solid fuel is an important component of a pathway to a more decarbonized future

Financing Clean Energy: A U.S. and Global Policy Overview. Professor Marilyn A. Brown School of Public Policy

Regulations. Outline Environmental Financial/Accounting. Based on. .edu /~metin Page 1. utdallas

Making Sense of U.S. Energy Markets

A Technical Perspective on Zero Energy Buildings

Summary of Integrated Capacity and Energy Revenue Modelling

Renewable Energy Feasibility Study for Ione Band of Miwok Indians

Generation Technology Options in a Carbon- Constrained World

A dynamic model for GA electricity planning with CO2 emissions considered

The Southwest Intertie Project: Assessment of Potential Benefits

HVDC Transmission and the Future of Clean Energy

Reinventing Fire Electricity Sector Methodology Snowmass Creek Road Snowmass, CO 81654

Reinventing Fire Electricity Sector Methodology Snowmass Creek Road Snowmass, CO 81654

The Economics of Wind Energy. Charles Vaughan Regional Director, Eastern United States Clipper Windpower, Inc.

Draft Energy Efficiency Cost-Benefit Analysis Avoided Cost Assumptions. July 1, 2013

A Review of the Costs of Nuclear Power Generation. Highlights. Introduction Volume 72, Number 1

The Role of Solar in the Long- Term Outlook of Electric Power Generation in the U.S.

THERE S SOMETHING IN THE AIR: A PRIMER ON WIND LEASES. by Robert P. Wright

AEP Ohio. Combined Heat and Power (CHP) May 24 th, 2017 Steve Giles Vice President Alternative Energy Hull & Associates, Inc.

Flexibility is the new black

MARKET CHALLENGES FACING COMPETITIVE POWER MARKETS IN THE NORTHEAST U.S. NCSL Energy Supply Task Force December 8, 2015

Market-Based Policy Concepts for Encouraging Fuel Diversity and Retaining Baseload Zero-Carbon Resources. December 4, 2014

MPSC Staff s Avoided Cost Methodology Case No.: U Capacity Component of Staff's Proposed Method

Carbon Reduction Options in Power Generation

LCOEs and Renewables Victor Niemeyer Program Manager, Energy and Environmental Policy Analysis and Company Strategy Program

Expanding Nuclear Energy s Value Proposition

High Efficiency Adaptive Blades for Wind Turbines

Levelized Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2012

Preferred option. NSW gas peaker 500MW Demand response up to 150MW Liddell battery 250MW Liddell synchronous condenser Inertia and reactive power

The Role of Coal in an All of the Above Energy Strategy 2 nd Clean Coal Industry Forum Aug 23 rd, 2015, Billings, MT

Executive Summary... 2

SAMPLE. Reference Code: GDAE6529IDB. Publication Date: April 2015

5/5/04 Nuclear Energy Economics and Policy Analysis

Ohio Renewable Porfolio Standard

Click to edit Master title style

ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS 2015 IRP RENEWABLES TECHNICAL CONFERENCE

Transcription:

The Economic Future of Nuclear Power Presentation to the Conference on Cost-Effective Carbon Restrictions Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Detroit, Michigan October 15, 2007 By George S. Tolley Professor Emeritus of Economics University of Chicago Donald W. Jones Vice President RCF, Inc.

The Economic Future of Nuclear Power Study requested by Under Secretary and Director of the Office of Nuclear Energy What will it take for nuclear power to enter the marketplace? Objective analysis not policy recommendations 2

White Paper Approach Business financial spreadsheet used to compare: Nuclear, gas, and coal costs Effects of assistance policies on business decisions Scenarios: Capital costs Effects of risk on required stock and bond returns Plant construction time Federal tax provisions Other financial variables First versus later plants First-of-a-kind engineering (FOAKE) costs Learning effects on construction costs Regulatory experience Comprehensive study of the future of nuclear power 3

Outline of Full Study (available at http://www.rcfecon.com/nuceconfull.pdf) Part One: Economic Competitiveness of Nuclear Energy 1. Levelized Costs of Baseload Alternatives 2. International Comparisons 3. Capital Costs 4. Learning by Doing 5. Financing Issues Part Two: Outlook for Nuclear Energy s Competitors 6. Gas and Coal Technologies 7. Fuel Prices 8. Environmental Policies Part Three: Nuclear Energy in the Years Ahead 9. Nuclear Energy Scenarios: 2015* 10. Nuclear Energy Scenarios: Beyond 2015 Background Studies *Focus of today s presentation 4

Peer Review: Provided Up-to-Date Information Industrial Leaders Legal Technical Financial National Laboratory Department of Energy 5

Nuclear Energy Scenarios: Key Findings 2015 New Nuclear Plants if No Policy Assistance Nuclear Assistance Policies Greenhouse Prospects Later Nuclear Plants Summary: The Major Influences on the Cost of Nuclear Energy 6

Key Findings 7

Key Findings Without federal financial policies, the first new nuclear plants coming on line will have a levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) that ranges from $47 to $71 per megawatt-hour (MWh), compared to $33 to $41 for coal-fired plants and $35 to $45 for gas-fired plants Once engineering costs are paid and the first few plants have been built, the 4 th or 5 th new nuclear plants could have costs as low as $33 per MWh Federal financial policies combining a 20% investment tax credit and an $18 per MWh production tax credit for 8 years could lower first-plant nuclear costs to $25 to $45 MWh 8

New Nuclear Plants if No Policy Assistance 9

Nuclear Generation Costs for 1 st Plants, $ per MWh Overnight Cost $1,200 per kw $1,800 per kw 5-year construction period Plant Life Plant Life 40 years 60 years 40 years 60 years 85% Capacity 47 47 62 61 7-year construction period Plant Life Plant Life 40 years 60 years 40 years 60 years 85% Capacity 53 53 71 70 10

Coal-Fired Generation Costs Overnight Cost $1,182 per kw $1,460 per kw Coal Price, $ per MMBtu 1.02 1.23 1.02 1.23 Generation Cost, $ per MWh 2-yr construction 33 35 36 39 3-yr construction 34 36 37 40 4-yr construction 35 37 37 41 11

Gas-Fired Generation Costs Overnight Cost $500 per kw $700 per kw Gas price, $ per MMBtu 3.39 4.25 & varying over forecast a 3.39 4.25 & varying over forecast a Generation Cost, $ per MWh 1-yr construction 35 42 37 44 2-yr construction 35 42 38 45 a EIA forecast. Beginning with a price forecast of $4.25 per MMBtu in 2015, a peak of $4.51 is reached in 2021, from which the forecast falls to $4.48 by 2025, at which level it remains for the remainder of the plant life. 12

Range of Costs 1st Nuclear: $47/MWh to $71/MWh Gas-fired: $35/MWh to $45/MWh Coal-fired: $33/MWh to $41/MWh 13

Nuclear Assistance Policies 14

Costs for 1 st New Nuclear Plants With a Combination of Policies, $ per MWh (20% ITC, $18/MWh PTC for 8 years) 85% Capacity 85% Capacity 40 years 25 Overnight Cost $1,200 per kw $1,800 per kw 5-year construction period Plant Life Plant Life 60 years 40 years 60 years 25 37 37 7-year construction period Plant Life Plant Life 40 years 60 years 40 years 60 years 31 30 46 45 15

Greenhouse Prospects The results have assumed no additional fossil emissions controls Carbon controls would change the competitive balance 16

Fossil Cost per MWh With and Without Greenhouse Gas Policies ($) Coal-fired Gas-fired Current Environmental Policies 33-41 35-45 Greenhouse Gas Policy 83-91 58-68 Note: 1 st plant Nuclear cost/mwh with no policy assistance 53-71 N th plant Nuclear cost/mwh with learning only 42-58 17

Later Nuclear Plants Preceding results are for initial plants Costs for later plants would be reduced by: Pay-down of FOAKE costs Learning effects reduce construction costs Favorable regulatory experience 18

Later Nuclear Plants: Factors Contributing to Cost Reduction Pay-down of $300 per kw in FOAKE costs Cost reduction from learning of 3 to 5 percent for plant doubling Favorable construction and regulatory experiences: Financiers accept 5-year construction time for planning purposes Risk premium of 3 percentage points above coal and gas construction eliminated Debt-equity ratios rise from 50-50 to as high as 70-30 19

Generation Costs of Later Nuclear Plants: Learning, Shorter Construction Time, Reduced Risk Premium, and Increase in Debt Ratio Scenario Initial Overnight Cost $1,200 per kw $1,500 per kw $1,800 per kw Plant FOAKE Costs, status Construction Time Risk Premium Debt Share of Financing 3% Cost Reduction from Learning 5% 3% 5% 3% 5% LCOE ($ per MWh) 1 Already paid on $1,200 plant. 7 years 3% 50% 53 53 62 62 71 71 2 All paid 7 years 3% 50% 51 51 51 51 60 59 3 All paid 5 years 3% 50% 45 44 45 44 52 51 4 All paid 5 years Gone 50% 36 35 36 35 41 40 5 All paid 5 years Gone 60% 34 33 34 33 38 37 7 All paid 5 years Gone 70% 32 31 32 31 36 35 20

The Major Influences on the Cost of Nuclear Power Risk Premium Construction Time Overnight Costs 21