An Overview of Boron Fertility in Prairie Soils and Canola Response to Fertilization.

Similar documents
Economic Profitability and Sustainability of Canola Production Systems in Western Canada

Crop Performance and Plant Microbe-Interactions are Affected by the Sequence and Frequency of Pulse Crops in the Canadian Prairie

Soil Testing Lab Update and Late Season Nitrogen in Corn

The response of wheat grown in Andisols and Oxisols to granular and fluid phosphorus fertilizers. Daniela Montalvo, Fien Degryse, and Mike McLaughlin

Chickpeas Respond Well To Inoculation With TagTeam

EVALUATION OF STRIP-TILLAGE AND FERTILIZER PLACEMENT IN SOUTHERN IDAHO CORN PRODUCTION. D.Tarkalson and D. Bjorneberg USDA-ARS, Kimberly, ID

Improving corn yields and NUE with late N applications using high clearance equipment

Pre-Plant Broadcast Urea in Direct Seeding, A Logistical Return to the Past? Tom Jensen

PHOSPHORUS SOURCE EFFECTS ON DRYLAND WINTER WHEAT IN CROP- FALLOW ROTATIONS IN EASTERN WASHINGTON

Assessing the Agronomic Value of Hog Manure-Derived Struvite as a Phosphorus Source for Spring Wheat

Fertilizer Placement and Tillage Interaction in Corn and Soybean Production

EFFECT OF FOLIAR CHAPERONE TM APPLICATIONS UNDER ELEVATED TEMPERATURES ON THE PROTEIN CONCENTRATIONS AND PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES OF COTTON

Spatiotemporal Variability of Productivity and Nutrient Availability in Flooded Rice Soils across Field Scales

The Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizers (Urea, Sulfur Coated Urea) with Manure on the Saffron Yield

Irrigated Soft White Wheat

Western Illinois University- School of Agriculture Organic Research Program 2013 Dry Humate/Fertility Studies Dr. Joel Gruver and Andy Clayton

EFFECT OF SOLID CATTLE MANURE AND LIQUID HOG MANURE APPLICATION ON PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN IN SOIL, RUN-OFF AND LEACHATE IN SASKATCHEWAN SOILS

STOP THE ROT!! Exploring the Relationship Between Nitrogen and Bacterial Diseases of Onions. Introduction. Acknowledgements.

Nutritional Evaluation of Forage Barley Varieties

Organic Cover Crop Research at WSU Puyallup

Manure application rates. Manure Application Effects on Soil Quality. Manure and Soil Quality. Page. Research indicates:

Comparison of Two Different WeedGuardPlus Paper Mulches and Black Plastic Mulch on the Production of Onions and Broccoli

2016 Prelim Essay Question 2

Nozzle and equipment considerations for improved coverage in the soybean canopy: A summary of the work done in Ohio

Conservation Tillage Strategies For Corn, Sorghum And Cotton

Presentation outline

Belowground perspectives in southern California grassland restoration

Evaluating Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) Indices on the Background of Mineral Status of the Seed Crop at Maturity: a Case Study of Maize

CONSERVATION VS CONVENTIONAL TILLAGE,FALL DOUBLE CROPPING

In situ evaluation of DGT techniques for measurement of trace. metals in estuarine waters: a comparison of four binding layers

Soil Quality Attribute Time Paths: Optimal Levels and Values

COMMUNICATION III. Ground Water-Bottom Soil-Water Interactions in Tropical Carp Nursery Ponds.

10/31/2010. Rough Project History. Study Questions. Study 1: Grazing Treatments. Study 1 Results. Study 1 Locations

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT IN DUAL-USE WHEAT PRODUCTION

The Effects of Soil Moisture and Nutrients on Cropland Productivity in the Highland Area of the Loess Plateau

25. CROP ROTATIONS 2: ALSIKE CLOVER AND ANNUAL CROP PRODUCTION by Garry Ropchan

VARIABLE RATE NITROGEN AND SEEDING TO IMPROVE NITROGEN USE EFFICIENCY TABITHA THERISA BROWN

H. Randall Smith; Ph.D. Agronomy and Wayne Porter: Ph.D. Horticulture Mississippi State University Extension Service

Nitrogen input to croplands and its environmental impacts in China

I Planted a Cover Crop Now Where s My Nitrogen?

Active stubble management to enhance residue breakdown and subsequent crop management focus farm trials

Study on the Effect of Different Modified Zeolite to Phosphorus Activation in Red Soil

Weed & Crop Emergence & Management in Strip Tillage

CONSERVATION TILLAGE IMPROVES SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIES ON DIFFERENT LANDSCAPE POSITIONS OF A COASTAL PLAIN SOIL.

Why talking about a speaking plant approach?

Managing corn earworm using GMO varieties, conventional and OMRI listed insecticides in sweet corn

Evaluation of Corn Varieties for Certified Organic Production Crawfordsville Trial, 1998

Climate Change and Crop Diseases

Chapter 9: Phase Diagrams

Evaluation of Winter Canola Grown in 30 inch Rows

Seasonal Runoff Losses of Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus from warm-season turfgrass systems

Comparison of Effects Between Foliar and Soil N Applications on Soil N and Growth of Young Gala/M9 Apple Trees

Equipment Development for Conservation Agriculture Ted S. Kornecki, Agricultural Engineer

Controls of denitrification in papyrus wetlands in Kenya and Tanzania

Small Business Cloud Services

In with the New: BMPs for Regrassing Cool-Season Turf

Is conservation agriculture climatesmart for maize farmers in the highlands of Tanzania?

Methane Emissions from the Stems of Living Trees in Upland Forests

Effects of water level regime on growth and nutrient retention capacity of Phragmites australis stands

145 ~ 175 m km m. 175 m m km 2[1,2] 175 m m ~ 155 m 155 ~ 165 m 165 ~ 54% 175 m

Metal bioavailability in sediments: scientific fact vs. regulatory reality

Ecological properties of earthworm burrows in an organically managed grass-clover system

Yield effect of applying earthworm castings produced during the oilseed rape-growing season in riceoilseed rape cropping fields to rice

Thistles. Also toss in Tansy Ragwort. Strategies for Weed Control Colusa, Glenn and Tehama Counties. Broadleaf selective all growth regulators

Managing Pink Rot. Pink Rot Management. Pink Rot Trials 2/15/2012. Fungicides for Pink Rot Management. Pink Rot Phytophthora erythroseptica

Methane emission from a simulated rice field ecosystem as influenced by hydroquinone and dicyandiamide

INCREASED PLANT PROTEIN, INSECT MORTALITY, AND YIELD WITH CHAPERONE TM

ABSTRACT: 405 DE LISI V 1, GONZÁLEZ V 1, REZNIKOV S 1,2, STEGMAYER C A 1, HENRIQUEZ D D 1, DEVANI M R 1 & PLOPER L D 1,2

FAILURE OF PINUS RADIATA VENEER IN TENSION ACROSS THE GRAIN

Pre- and post-emergence applications of herbicides for control of resistant fineleaf sheep fescue

ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT OF THE SITES IMPACTED BY THE PROBO KOALA TOXIC WASTE DUMPING IN ABIDJAN, CÔTE D IVOIRE

d Soil Qu Agronomic and age and Tilla Ames, Iowa

Annex 5: Henrik Haugaard-Nielsen, Senior Researcher. Dorette Müller-Stöver, Post Doc.

Determination of Leaf Color Chart and SPAD value for Tarom variety in different N usage

How to reduce FHB and the presence of toxins in cereals?

CHANGES IN ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION IN SAVANNAHS AND FIELDS INVADED BY CHROMOLAENA ODORATA IN CAMEROON

Effect of Biosolid Application on Bioavailability of Potassium in two Different Kinds of Soils Textures and Yield of Corn Plant

Effect of soil temperature and moisture on soil test P with different extractants

NOTICE CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS

How Can I Reduce Operating Cost and Maintain a Viable Operation?

Topic 7. Acids, Bases, Buffers, Titrations, Polyprotic acids

MINIMALLY COMPOSTED SUBSTRATE FOR PRODUCTION OF AGARICUS BISPORUS. Stephanie Loehr

Tree Shelters Fail to Enhance Height Growth of Northern Red Oak in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. 1

EFFECTS OF MICRO-ELEMENT FERTILIZERS ON THE YIELD OF AGRIA POTATOES

Sorghum pest management

Iron in the Fire: How Does Bermudagrass Respond?

Planning & Performance Reporting Officer. Job Description

EVALUATION OF CORN AND SOYBEAN RESPONSE TO PHOSPHORUS AND POTASSIUM FERTILIZATION INGRID ARNS. B.S., Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 2010

Lygus Control, New Chemistry & Crop Loss Reporting

[ HOCl] Chapter 16. Problem. Equilibria in Solutions of Weak Acids. Equilibria in Solutions of Weak Acids

Soil Quality in Intensive Organic Management Systems. Craig Cogger, Doug Collins, Andy Bary, Ann-Marie Fortuna, and Ann Kennedy

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

A. Monsefi 1*, A. R. Sharma 2, and N. Rang Zan 3 ABSTRACT

The effect of commercial organic fertilizer on N-P-K use efficiency. of lowland rice in the Lao PDR

1. Effect of cropping intensity, tillage, and residue cover on soil properties

Factors influencing arsenic accumulation by Pteris vittata: A comparative field study at two sites

Characterisation of some South African water treatment residues and implications for land application

EFFECT OF ROTATION, ORGANIC INPUTS AND TILLAGE ON CROP PERFORMANCE AND SOIL QUALITY IN CONVENTIONAL AND LOW-INPUT ROTATIONS IN CENTRAL IOWA

p Coaches j i n C Dimensions Report Name Ali Example Date of Report: 29/06/2016 Team Profile 3

FIA-FSP Project Y Effects of intensive fertilization on timber and non-timber resources. Executive Summary April 2006

Transcription:

An Overview of Boron Fertility in Pririe Soils nd Cnol Response to Fertiliztion. Nobur Rhmn nd Jeff Schoenu Deprtment of Soil Science, U of S Mrch 6, 2017

Justifiction Boron (B) is rther unique s only slight chnges in B concentrtion in soil solution re ssocited with yield impeding deficiency or toxic effects in plnts Need to consider how soil, crop nd mngement fctors ffect soil B sttus nd likelihood of response to dded B fertilizer. (Hvlin et l., 1999)

Justifiction Boron deficiency issues in priries: Site specific: ptchy distribution -sptil vribility of soil properties (Rz et l., 2002. Krmnos et l., 2003)

Justifiction Boron deficiency issues in priries: Crop specific: Cnol identified s most susceptible smll grin crop

Justifiction Inconsistent yield response to fertiliztion reported - Uncertinty bout soil test criticl levels Soil properties my control fte nd efficcy - Trnsformtion nd complextion - Redistribution to unvilble pools (Krmnos nd Goh. 2001, Krmnos et l., 2003)

Reserch questions? Which soil properties re contributing to deficiency? Wht is the response of cnol to B fertiliztion?

Objectives To determine vilble B in pririe soils, nd reltionship with soil properties To evlute the impct of B fertiliztion on yield of cnol vrieties grown in contrsting pririe soils

Soil Collection

Methods nd Mterils Collection of 47 field soils to represent rnge of pririe soils with contrsting soil properties: Snd: 6% to 94% ph: 5.0 to 7.8, OC: 0.9% to 43% Assessment of soil extrctble nd supply rte of B nd reltionship to soil properties - hot wter extrction for vilble B, nd PRS resin membrne extrction for supply rte - Hot wter B: 0.4 to 3.6 mg B kg -1 PRS B supply rte: 0.02 to 0.3 ug/10 cm 2 /24hr Response of cnol to B fertiliztion in selected soils

Results Brown soil zone (7 soils) HWSB = Hot Wter Soluble B; SRB= Supply Rte of B Orgnic C nd extrctble B most closely relted

Drk Brown soil zone (7 soils) HWSB = Hot Wter Soluble B; SRB= Supply Rte of B Snd content negtively relted to extrctble B High snd content contributes to high supply rte of B

Blck soil zone (22 soils) HWSB = Hot Wter Soluble B; SRB= Supply Rte of B Extrctble B most positively relted to orgnic C

Gry soil zone (7 soils) HWSB = Hot Wter Soluble B; SRB= Supply Rte of B Orgnic C strong controller of extrctble B Snd contributes to higher supply rte of B

Pet soils (3 soils) HWSB = Hot Wter Soluble B; SRB= Supply Rte of B Most properties of the pet soil hd no reltion to vilble B (only 3 soils); High crbonte = low supply rte of B

Summry Orgnic C strongly contributes to extrctble B. Snd content is inversely relted to extrctble B, but directly relted to supply rte of B (diffusion). In pety soils, high crbonte content my contribute to low B supply rte.

Cnol Response to Boron Fertiliztion

Soil Fctor Evlution: Five Contrsting Soils Whitewood Drk Gry Chernozem (Dnbury) Echo Brown Solodized Solonetz (Centrl Butte) Whitefox Drk Gry Chernozem (Nipwin) Sceptre Orthic Vertisol (Sceptre) Uklt Blck Chernozem (Alix, AB) All soils received bsl ppliction of N, P, K nd S

Tretments Methods nd Mterils T 1 : Control T 2 : Soil ppliction @ 1 kg B h -1 T 3 : Folir ppliction 1 (one time) @ 0.25 kg B h -1 T 4 : Folir ppliction 2 (two times) @ 0.25 kg B h -1

Results WHITEWOOD O.DGC (Dnbury, SK) B= 0.9 mg kg -1 ; ph=6.9; Snd=49%; OC=3.0% Control Soil Folir 1 Folir 2 Biomss yield (g pot -1 ) 20 15 10 5 0 Grin Strw

WHITEWOOD O.DGC (Dnbury, SK) B= 0.9 mg kg -1 ; ph=6.9; Snd=49%; OC=3.0% Control Soil Folir 1 Folir 2

ECHO B.SS (Centrl Butte, SK): B= 1.5 mg kg -1 ; ph=6.5; Snd=44%; OC=2.0% Control Soil Folir 1 Folir 2 Biomss yield (g pot -1 ) 20 15 10 5 0 Grin Strw

ECHO B.SS (Centrl Butte, SK): B= 1.5 mg kg -1 ; ph=6.5; Snd=44%; OC=2.0% Control Soil Folir 1 Folir 2

UKALTA series (Alix, AB) B= 0.9 mg kg -1 ; ph=5.5; Snd=81%; OC=2.6% Control Soil Folir 1 Folir 2 Biomss yield (g pot-1) 25 20 15 10 5 0 Grin Strw

UKALTA series (Alix, AB) B= 0.9 mg kg -1 ; ph=5.5; Snd=81%; OC=2.6% Control Soil Folir 1 Folir 2

SCEPTRE O.V (Sceptre, SK) B= 1.1 mg kg -1 ; ph=7.6; Snd=7%; OC=1.7% Control Soil Folir 1 Folir 2 Biomss yield (g pot -1 ) 20 15 10 5 0 Grin Strw

SCEPTRE O.V (Sceptre, SK) B= 1.1 mg kg -1 ; ph=7.6; Snd 7%; OC=1.7% Control Soil Folir 1 Folir 2

WHITEFOX O.DGC (Nipwin, SK) B= 0.45 mg kg -1 ; ph=5.0; Snd=57%; OC=2.2% Control Soil Folir 1 Folir 2 Biomss yield (g pot -1 ) 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 b b Grin b Strw

WHITEFOX O.DGC (Nipwin, SK) B= 0.45 mg kg -1 ; ph=5.0; Snd=57%; OC=2.2% Control Soil Folir 1 Folir 2

WHITEFOX O.DGC (Nipwin, SK) B= 0.45 mg kg -1 ; ph=5.0; Snd=57%; OC=2.2% Control Soil Folir 1 Folir 2

Summry Of the five soils, cnol responded to B on one soil (Whitefox) extrctble B ws t mrginl level (HWSB = 0.45 mg kg -1 ) only soil ppliction ws effective.

Crop Fctor: Genotype evlution Control versus B fertiliztion tretments were tested on five different vrieties/mrket clsses of cnol on low extrctble B soil (Meot) Cnol vrieties (genotypes) V₁: InVigor LL 252 (B. npus) V₂: Roundup Redy VT 500G (B. npus) V₃: Andnte mustrd (Yellow; Sinpsis Alb) V₄: XCEED 8571 (B. junce) V₅: ACS-C7 (Polish; B. rp)

Results Meot O.BLC: B=0.6 mg kg -1 ; ph=6.7; Snd=89%; OC=1.7%

Summry No significnt yield response of ny cnol vrieties to B fertiliztion on low extrctble B Meot soil. High supply rte (0.12 ug/10 cm 2 /24hr) detected in this soil (corse texture).

Tke Home Messge In minerl soils, orgnic mtter hs strongest reltionship with soil test extrctble B. Texture nd ph hd more vrible influence. Soil B chemistry is complex! Yield response to boron fertiliztion my be expected in soils with HWSB vlue t criticl level (<0.35 mg B kg -1 ). Tking into considertion effects of soil properties on bility of B to move in soil lso seems importnt.

Next Steps To understnd biovilbility nd fte of pplied B in reltion to soil properties, rhizosphere modifiction nd plnt uptke Chemicl nd Spectroscopic Specition!

Acknowledgements Ryn Hngs nd Cory Ftteicher Tem Schoenu (Nutrient Mngement Lb Group) AAFC AgriInnovtion Progrm

References Hvlin, J.L., S.L. Tisdle, W.L. Nelson, nd J.D. Beton. 1999. Soil fertility nd fertilizers: An introduction to nutrient mngement. 8 th edition. Prentice Hll, Upper Sddle River, NJ. Krmnos, R., nd T.B. Goh. 2001. Are Present Soil Test Cu, B nd Zn Criteri for Whet, Cnol nd Bens, Respectively, Accurte? Mnitob Agronomists Conference. University of Mnitob.http://www.umnitob.c/fculties/fs/MAC_proceedings/2001/pd f/krmnos. Pdf Krmnos, R.E., T.B. Goh, nd T.A. Stonehouse. 2003. Cnol response to boron in Cndin pririe soils. Cn. J. Plnt Sci. 83: 249-259. Rz, M., A.R. Mermut, J.J. Schoenu, nd S.S. Mlhi. 2002. Boron frctiontion in some Ssktchewn soils. Cn. J. Soil Sci. 82: 173-179.

Thnk you?