WE RE ABOUT DELIVERING THE SOLUTION

Similar documents
WE RE ABOUT FERTILIZER FOR AFRICA. POLY4, a fertilizer suitable for 21st century African agriculture. Africa Fertilizer 2018

WE RE ABOUT SOLUTIONS

POLY4 A NATURAL SOLUTION TO A BALANCED FERTILIZATION IN AFRICA

REGIONAL SOIL CHALLENGES VIETNAM

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT BLEND RATIOS OF POLY4 WITH MOP ON THE YIELD AND NUTRIENT UPTAKE OF RICE IN SICHUAN, CHINA

RESPONDING TO THE NEEDS OF EUROPEAN AGRICULTURE

Important Notices. BASIS CPD Points PN/43609/1415/g; 2 points

BIO-FERTILIZERs & FERTIGATION

A Pocket Guide to. nutrient. stewardship

POLY4 PRODUCT HANDBOOK

A M E R O P A. Fertilizers. presentation for ASBA Cargo Conference in Miami FL. 28 Sept 2017

Making Biochar Commercially Viable; Recent Experiences from around the World. Stephen Joseph

Reducing the carbon footprint of coffee production through improved fertilizer management. Katharina Plassmann

Reducing the carbon footprint of coffee production through improved fertilizer management. Katharina Plassmann

FOLTRON Global Training Module

A Review of the Agronomics Related to the Use of Polyhalite as a Major Fertilizer Product in World Agriculture

Fertilizer Sector Improvement (FSI+) Crop Cut Survey Report

SPAIN / ACEFER. October 2011

FERTILIZER AND FERTILIZATION LECTURE 3

WQ221 Spreading Poultry Litter With Lab Analysis but Without Soil Tests...

NOVEMBER World and Brazilian Fertilizer Market. Company Overview

Nutrient Management. Things to Know. Chapter 16. Fertilizer Use Concerns. Goals of Fertilizer Usage. Nutrient Balance in Soil. p.

WE RE ABOUT DELIVERY. Presentation to the ICE Presentation by Matt Parsons and Mark Pooleman March 2018

Nutrient Removal by Crops

Best management for N & S in canola and wheat. Rob Norton

Wisconsin Crop Management Conference Fertilizer Market Outlook

Fertiliser Market Update

Statewide Extension Projects

Evaluation of maize fertilizer mixture performance on post harvest soil fertility

Super soluble potassium sulphate for modern agriculture Focus on potatoes

Nutrient Management in Field Crops MSU Fertilizer Recommendations Crop*A*Syst 2015 Nutrient Management Training

BIOZYME Global Training Module

Nutrient management. Cassava

U.S. Fertilizer Situation and Outlook for 2009

Seed Banding Fertilizer What are the Limits?

United States Department of Agriculture. Executive Summary 8:30 AM NOVEMBER 9, 2011

1Q18 Conference Call May 16, 2018

Fertility and Crop Nutrition. B. Linquist, R. Mutters, J. Hill and C. vankessel Rice Production Workshop, March 21, 2011

OVERVIEW OF AGRICULTURE AND FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN THAILAND

Principles Of Fertigation In Micro Irrigation

Prices and Profitability of Fertilizers

EXAMPLE QUESTIONS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION EXAM

2/20/2013. Sulfur and Sulfuric Acid. Sulfur: Production and Use in North America and the World. Sulfur Production Types. Elemental Sulfur Production

Indian Fertilizer Market

Fertilizer Industry s Views: Enhancing Agricultural Productivity Sustainably. Luc M. Maene, Director General, IFA

2016 SE Hay Convention Presented by Fertilization Outlook for Hay Producers

Human Urine an Alternative to Chemical Fertilizers in Crop Production

Recalibration of the Phosphate Market

Abstract. Introduction. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 21 (No 4) 2015, Agricultural Academy

Vital Statistics (Part III)

Integrated Soil Fertility Management in the Topics

Important Notices. BASIS CPD Points PN/47342/1516/g

Potential impact of crop diversification and biotechnological inventions on the use of micronutrients

DEVELOPMENT OF NEW GENERATION FERTILIZERS FOR HORTICULTURE AND FIELD CROPS

Market Update. October 2018

How to use Artificial Fertilizers. AT UGANDA LIMITED SOILS BROCHURE SERIES No. 02

Strengthening the fertilizer value chain in Africa

A Global Framework for Best Management Practices for Fertilizer Use

Influence of industrial wastes on growth, yield and yield attributing characters of rice

Pioneering the Nutrigation Way. The Benefits of Nutrigation

Wheat Grain Nutrient Content. Tom Jensen International Plant Nutrition Institute Saskatoon, SK

Fertilizer Statistics Overview TANZANIA Edition

Fertilizer Statistics Overview KENYA

Global and Brazilian Fertilizer Market. Company Overview. November, 2010

The Value of Global Soil Information to the International Plant Nutrition Institute

Nutrient management. Rice

Fertilizers in Brazil New opportunities

The effect of potassium nitrate based foliar sprays on growth and yield of soybean fertilized with increasing KCl dose rates at basal dressing.

Global Potash Market Report

POTENTIAL FOR USE OF CONTROLLED RELEASE FERTILIZERS IN AGRICULTURE: PRESENT AND FUTURE

Potash and Phosphate Outlook a presentation for the AAAC Outlook Conference

Latin America Fertilizer Demand

Umostart. Microgranular fertiliser. give your crops a better start for a stronger finish

FERTILISER BLENDS, A LOCAL INDUSTRY

The Potash Outlook. Al Mulhall Director, Market Research - PotashCorp. November 2, 2005

Biomass Accumulation and Nutrient Uptake of Cereals at Different Growth Stages in the Parkland Region of Saskatchewan

THE OUTLOOK FOR FERTILIZER SUPPLY IN VIETNAM

Nutrients for Life Food Security and Nutri on

Ammonia-based Fertilizer Markets Are Fertilizers Petrochemicals too?

Soil Test Laboratory Analysis and Fertilizer Recommendations

NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY TO CORN FROM DAIRY MANURES AND FERTILIZER IN A CALCAREOUS SOIL

Agriculture Media Planning Guide. August 2018

Eric Woodford Woodf W o oodf rd r Cu sto t m, Inc. 1

Market Update. June 2018

Understanding Salt Index of Fertilizers. Carrie Laboski Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin-Madison

Institute of Ag Professionals

University of Georgia; SQM Tifton, GA USA

Harvest Minerals Limited / Index: LSE / Epic: HMI / Sector: Mining

Conservation Agriculture Soil Health Matters

Sulphur Responses of Crops in North-Western Ontario

OVERCOMING SOIL ACIDITY CONSTRAINTS THROUGH

Agricultural Regions

Improving Nutrient Use Efficiency with 4R Nutrient Stewardship

Managing nutrient needs in organic farming. Judith Nyiraneza

PLANT NUTRITION. BorreGRO HA-1. An Effective Soil Conditioner for Improved Crop Growth

Umostart. Microgranular starter fertiliser. give your crops a better start for a stronger finish

Potash market highlights

The using conditions and developing directions of Chinese phosphorous fertilizer

Institute of Ag Professionals

INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT EFFECT IN RICE-RICE SEQUEN- TIAL CROP PING SYS TEM ON SOIL FER TIL ITY AND CROP PRO DUC TIV ITY

Transcription:

WE RE ABOUT DELIVERING THE SOLUTION Improving NPKs through a simple multi-nutrient NPK feedstock Robert Meakin

THE PRODUCT 1 1

INTRODUCTION TO POLY4 EFFICIENCY POLY4 characteristic: Delivers greater nutrient uptake B CaO Cu MgO EFFECTIVENESS POLY4 characteristic: Improves both yield and quality Delivers four macro nutrients in one product Desirable nutrient release profile Mn Se Improves macro and micro nutrient uptake Minimises crop losses through disease resistance Low chloride and ph neutral FLEXIBILITY K 2 O S SUSTAINABILITY POLY4 characteristic: No negative interactions with other fertilizers Sr Fe Zn POLY4 characteristic: Improves soil strength, structure and nutrient legacy Handles, stores, blends and spreads effectively Allows a farmer to choose the timing of application Reduces agriculture s impact by improving Fertilizer Use Efficiency Certified for organic use and low environmental impact 2

COMPATIBILITY AND PRACTICALITY DRY BLEND Influence up to 50% (w/w) POLY4 composition Compatibility Urea-DAP-KCl-POLY4 Improved COMPACTED NPK COMPOUND Influence up to 50% (w/w) POLY4 composition Abrasion resistance CRH Dust Urea-DAP-KCl-POLY4 Improved ~ Improved STEAM GRANULATED NPK COMPOUND Influence up to 50% (w/w) POLY4 composition Abrasion resistance Impact resistance Dust Urea-DAP-KCl-POLY4 Improved Improved Improved KEY TAKEAWAY: POLY4 HAS A POSITIVE IMPACT ON DRY BLENDS, COMPACTED AND STEAM-GRANULATED COMPLEXES Notes: IFDC methodology ratifies methods of Walker et al (1998) and published findings of Albadarin et al (2017). Sources: 66000-IFDC-66010-17 3

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 4 4

SIRIUS MINERALS R&D PROGRAMME Trials 260+ Crops 32 Countries 17 Notes: Trials as of January 2018 5

R&D MARKET ADOPTION PROGRAM IN BRAZIL Clear pathway for R&D market adoption is set out to validate the agronomic and commercial value on both broad-acre and high-value crops with local partners. Year: Year: 2018 2020 2019 2021 Levels and type of stakeholders of R&D programme for demonstration: Crop trial studies (legend): Research institutes Local fertilizer distributors Common beans Soybean Corn Cotton Sirius Minerals Sugarcane Rice Co-ops Crops processing Winter crops (barley, wheat, oat) Coffee Vegetables Citrus Forest(eucalyptus and pinus) 6

GLOBAL: NUTRIENT UPTAKE AND YIELD IMPROVEMENT 7 7

SUSTAINED MACRO-NUTRIENT DELIVERY Macro-nutrient uptake results from global trials 1 Improvements in macro-nutrient uptake compared to MOP Control MOP POLY4 N -2% +13% Initial soil analysis 1 Soil measurement Value P (mg kg -1 ) 38 P -1% +7% K (mg kg -1 ) 100 K -11% +11% Mg (mg kg -1 ) 116 Ca +5% +26% Ca (mg kg -1 ) 1311 Mg +2% +23% S (mg kg -1 ) 20 S -3% +31% OM (g kg -1 ) 19 KEY TAKEAWAY: POLY4 OUTPERFORMED MOP IN MACRO-NUTRIENT UPTAKE Notes: 1) The results are based on 32 trials, which include trials conducted in Asia (China), Europe (UK & France), Latin America (Brazil) and North America (US) covering both high-value and broad-acre crops such as tea, tobacco, tomato, soybean, wheat, potato and corn. Source : Sirius Minerals 8

SUSTAINED MICRO-NUTRIENT DELIVERY Micro-nutrient uptake results from global trials 1 Improvements in micro-nutrient uptake compared to MOP K sources Control MOP POLY4 B +11% +12% Initial soil analysis Soil measurement Value Mn -5% +14% B (mg kg -1 ) 1.0 Zn -12% +13% Mn (mg kg -1 ) 20 Cu +19% +32% Zn (mg kg -1 ) 6.0 Fe -5% +7% Cu (mg kg -1 ) 5.0 Al -18% -27% Fe (mg kg -1 ) 87 KEY TAKEAWAY: POLY4 OUTPERFORMED MOP IN MACRO-NUTRIENT UPTAKE Notes: 1) The results are based on 32 trials, which include trials conducted in Asia (China), Europe (UK & France), Latin America (Brazil) and North America (US) covering both high value and broad acre crops such as tea, tobacco, tomato, soybean, wheat, potato and corn. The result for Al is based on a trial result in China. Source : Sirius Minerals 9

ALTERNATIVES IN NPK BLENDS COMPOSITION Soybean: 0:18:18 blend composition Corn: 6:14:14 blend composition Standard 0:18:18 P 2 O 5 (18) K 2 O (18) S (6) CaO (18) Cl (14) Standard 6:14:14 N (6) P 2 O 5 (14) K 2 O (14) S (5) CaO (14) Cl (11) Input TSP (20%) SSP (44%) MOP (30%) Filler (6%) Input Urea (13%) TSP (42%) SSP (13%) MOP (23%) Filler (7%) POLY4 0:18:18 P 2 O 5 (18) K 2 O (18) S (8) CaO (15) MgO (3) Cl (10) POLY4 6:14:14 N (6) P 2 O 5 (14) K 2 O (14) S (9) CaO (14) MgO (3) Cl (7) Input TSP (39%) MOP (20%) POLY4 (41%) Input Urea (7%) MAP (27%) MOP (11%) POLY4 (51%) Filler (3%) 10

Average % yield Sustaining the future. LATIN AMERICA: POLY4 BLEND PERFORMANCE COMPARED TO STANDARD NPK, Ca, Mg, S BLENDS Yield results from blend trials in Brazil 1 Average POLY4 blend performance Initial soil analysis Soil measurement Value P (mg kg -1 ) 12 97 97 100 K (mg kg -1 ) 34 Mg (mg kg -1 ) 173 Ca (mg kg -1 ) 471 S (mg kg -1 ) 13 MOP SOP POLY4 OM (g kg -1 ) 11 KEY TAKEAWAY: POLY4 OUTPERFORMED MOP AND SOP REFLECTING THE ADDED BENEFIT FOR FARMERS Notes: 1) The results are based on trials in Latin America (Brazil) covering crops such as tomato, soybean, potato, corn and carrot. Source: Sirius Minerals. There are only four blend trials (in Sao Paulo) in which SOP was involved. 11

TRIAL RESULTS 12 12

CROP TRIAL: SOYBEAN PARTNER: UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO

INTRODUCTION/TRIAL DESIGN Brazil produced 31% of the world s soybean in 2013 and is projected to become the world s largest soybean producer by 2026 Soybean production in Brazil accounts for about 35% of K 2 O fertilizer use in Brazil Treatments were equivalent commercial blends with the K derived from either MOP or POLY4 The trial was randomized complete block design with seven replications. TREATMENT TABLE Treatment Average nutrients applied in trial (kg ha -1 ) P K 2 O CaO MgO S Cl Control 72 0 71 0 23 0 Standard 0:18:18 blend POLY4 0:18:18 blend 72 72 71 0 23 58 72 72 58 10 31 44 INITIAL SOIL ANALYSIS Nutrients Amount of nutrient in soil (mg kg -1 ) Soil organic matter 2.2% P 15 K 32 Ca 160 Mg 49 S 10 TRIAL OBJECTIVE: TO EVALUATE POLY4 IN A COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER PROGRAMME FOR SOYBEAN IN BRAZIL Note: Soil ph = 4.6. Standard blend contained Muriate of Potash (MOP), Single Super Phosphate (SSP) and Triple Super Phosphate (TSP); POLY4 blend contained MOP, TSP and POLY4. University of São Paulo (2016) 4000-USP-4022-16. 14

Plant stand at emergence ( 000 plants ha -1 ) Plant stand at harvest ( 000 plants ha -1 ) Sustaining the future. PLANT POPULATIONS +7% +4% 311 278 289 290 Standard blend POLY4 blend Standard blend POLY4 blend KEY TAKEAWAY: POLY4 SUPPORTS AND SUSTAINS CROP ESTABLISHMENT Notes: Standard blend contained muriate of potash (MOP), single super phosphate (SSP) and triple super phosphate (TSP); POLY4 blend contained MOP, TSP and POLY4. University of São Paulo (2016) 4000-USP-4022-16. 15

Yield (t ha -1 ) Protein yield (kg ha -1 ) Sustaining the future. YIELD AND QUALITY SOYBEAN YIELD PROTEIN YIELD +7% +7% 2.2 2.8 3.0 825 1018 1092 Control Standard blend POLY4 blend Control Standard blend POLY4 blend KEY TAKEAWAY: THE POLY4 BLEND HAD THE GREATEST SOYBEAN AND PROTEIN YIELDS Notes: Standard blend contained Muriate of Potash (MOP), Single Super Phosphate (SSP) and Triple Super Phosphate (TSP); POLY4 blend contained MOP, TSP and POLY4. The yield-k 2 O ratio is the grain yield (kg ha -1 ) / K fertilizer applied (kg ha -1 ). University of São Paulo (2016) 4000-USP-4022-16. 16

GRAIN NUTRIENT OFFTAKE Improvements in macro-nutrient uptake compared to the standard blend Improvements in micro-nutrient uptake compared to the standard blend Standard blend POLY4 blend Standard blend POLY4 blend N +7% B ~ P +10% Cu +9% K +7% Ca +11% Fe +12% Mg +13% Mn ~ S +11% Zn +24% KEY TAKEAWAY: Notes: Standard blend contained muriate of potash (MOP), single super phosphate (SSP) and triple super phosphate (TSP); POLY4 blend contained MOP, TSP and POLY4. University of São Paulo (2016) 4000-USP-4022-16. THE POLY4 BLEND ENHANCED MACRO AND MICRO NUTRIENT OFFTAKE 17

Margin (US$ ha -1 ) Sustaining the future. MARGIN +$53 717 890 943 Control Standard blend POLY4 blend KEY TAKEAWAY: THE POLY4 BLEND GAVE THE GREATEST MARGIN Notes: Standard blend contained muriate of potash (MOP), single super phosphate (SSP) and triple super phosphate (TSP); POLY4 blend contained MOP, TSP and POLY4. Results presented are based on data from GENSTAT ANOVA means at K 2 O rate of 72 kg ha -1. Fertilizer prices were obtained from CRU and are 2017 prices for Brazil: MOP (US$262 t -1 ), POLY4 (US$200 t -1 ), TSP (US$281 t -1 ), SSP (US$144 t -1 ). Costs include spreading cost of US$13.07 t -1. Soybean price was obtained from FAOSTAT (US$344 t -1 ). Margin = Crop Output (Cost of fertilizer material + Cost of fertilizer application). University of São Paulo (2016) 4000-USP-4022-16. 18

SSP price (US$ t -1 ) Sustaining the future. SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS Additional margin gain (US$ t -1 ) Marginal cost of SSP production MOP price (US$ t -1 ) 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 360 66 37 37 37 38 38 39 39 39 40 40 40 41 41 42 42 42 140 51 51 51 52 52 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 56 56 56 150 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 55 56 56 56 57 57 57 58 58 160 54 55 55 56 56 56 57 57 58 58 58 59 59 59 60 60 170 56 57 57 58 58 58 59 59 59 60 60 61 61 61 62 62 180 58 59 59 59 60 60 61 61 61 62 62 62 63 63 64 64 190 60 61 61 61 62 62 62 63 63 64 64 64 65 65 65 66 200 62 62 63 63 64 64 64 65 65 65 66 66 67 67 67 68 210 64 64 65 65 65 66 66 67 67 67 68 68 68 69 69 70 220 66 66 67 67 67 68 68 68 69 69 70 70 70 71 71 71 230 68 68 68 69 69 70 70 70 71 71 71 72 72 73 73 73 240 70 70 70 71 71 72 72 72 73 73 73 74 74 75 75 75 250 72 72 72 73 73 73 74 74 75 75 75 76 76 76 77 77 260 73 74 74 75 75 75 76 76 76 77 77 78 78 78 79 79 270 75 76 76 76 77 77 78 78 78 79 79 79 80 80 81 81 KEY TAKEAWAY: THE POLY4 BLEND GENERATED EXTRA MARGIN THAN THE STANDARD BLEND UNDER LOWER SSP AND MOP PRICES Notes: Standard blend contained muriate of potash (MOP), single super phosphate (SSP) and triple super phosphate (TSP); POLY4 blend contained MOP, TSP and POLY4. 19

SUMMARY POLY4 is practical solution for nutrient delivery, compatible and suitable as a blend component or as a stand-alone product Crops depend on timely availability of a balanced supply of appropriate nutrients POLY4 will ensure improved macro and micro nutrient supply supporting quality and plant health POLY4 supports rapid crop establishment Crop yields are improved above conventional, high specification nutrient-balanced alternatives POLY4 fertilizer plans offer resilience to input-price fluctuations providing assured economic success KEY TAKEAWAY: MULTI-NUTRIENT FERTILIZER POLICIES IMPROVE YIELD AND FUE 20

THANK YOU 21