Production of ohne Gentechnik Food Facility Description Agriculture animal products

Similar documents
Facility Description Agriculture Stage Animal Production

Production of ohne Gentechnik Food Facility Description Logistics (Transport and Storage)

Production of ohne Gentechnik Food Facility Description Feed Manufacturers and Traders

National standards for nutrient contents in manure

VLOG Ohne Gentechnik Production and Certification Standard Revision Information

ANNEX 5: Animals and Animal products

Ohne Gentechnik Production and Certification Standard Revision Information

Manure Production and Management Record Keeping Forms

Final Version December STANDARD ON THE RISK-BASED CONTROL OF GMO-FREE PRODUCTION PROCESSES (Non GM Danube Region Inspection Standard)

"Ohne Gentechnik" Production and Certification Standard

MINIMUM DISTANCE SEPARATION (MDS 1) GUIDE FOR NEW NON-AGRICULTURAL USES ADJACENT TO EXISTING LIVESTOCK

Holmes Co Mg CFU per ha

MINIMUM DISTANCE SEPARATION (MDS II) GUIDE FOR NEW OR EXPANDING LIVESTOCK FACILITIES AND/OR MANURE STORAGES

a) Vision To be the preferred animal feeds manufacturer and supplier in Kenya.

PILOT STUDIES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF LINKING IACS AND

Documentation of statistics for Slaughter Animals and Meat Production 2017 Month 06

dairy cattle, Breed Tell their principal uses and merits. Tell where the breeds originated.

ANIMAL SCIENCE Merit Badge Requirements

ISCC for Non GMO food and feed

"Ohne Gentechnik" Production and Certification Standard

ANIMAL SCIENCE BYU PowWow Official Merit Badge Worksheet

OneCert OSP - Livestock OneCert Organic System Plan (OSP) - Livestock

Chenango County 4-H Livestock Project Record

Remark repeated D evaluation/general K.O.

The Agricultural Operations Regulations

2008 No. 196 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. The Nitrates Action Programme (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2008

June Area: Sections G K

FAQ GMP+ FRA certification

Animal breeding in Latvia

Animal Science Merit Badge Workbook

Agriculture in Hungary, 2010 (Agricultural census) Preliminary data (1) (Based on processing 12.5% of questionnaires.)

Linking Epidemic & Economic Modeling An Economic Perspective. Bruce McCarl Amy Hagerman Presentation to FAZD Modeling Group Jan 31, 2008

Municipalities and the Agricultural Operation Practices Act (AOPA)

Natural fertiliser control and application system in Poland state of the art. The natural manure composition in Poland estimating and verification

MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD. Sofia 1040, blvd. Hristo Botev 55 CENSUS OF AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS IN THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA IN 2010

Alberta Today Supplier of Safe Food Products Meat Sector Starts With High Quality Genetics

I N S T R U C T I O N S For Completion of the NOTICE OF INTENT TO OBTAIN PERMIT COVERAGE

Manitoba Markets Livestock Prices

L I V E S T O C K. Alberta Livestock Industry in Table No.

Agricultural Science Past Exam Questions Animal Production Higher Level

Checklist. KRAV s Extra Requirements for Dairy Products. For verifying KRAV s extra requirements in the KRAV standards chapter 16 (edition 2018).

PLEASURE WITH A CLEAR CONSCIENCE beef from the grasslands of the Baltic States Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.

2018 ROSS COUNTY LIVESTOCK RECORD This Record book will be a required part of Jr. Fair Livestock Project Completion

INTRODUCTION MOUNT PHOTO OF YOU AND YOUR BREEDING PROJECT IN THIS SPACE

Structural analysis of domestic meat supply on development regions

Tab 1a. Pigs Data Entry and Assumptions (April 26, 2018)

Animal Science Merit Badge Workbook

Business mailing address (include civic number and road name) City/Town Province Postal code

Updated July Lead authors Nicholas Hutchings, Barbara Amon, Ulrich Dämmgen, Jim Webb

How to Write a. (519)

UNIT 6 UNDERSTANDING THE PROCESS FOR PRODUCING, BREEDING, AND MARKETING AGRICULTURE ANIMALS

MBOONI WEST SUB - COUNTY FORM FOUR JOINT EVALUATION TEST, 2014

Product Board Animal Feed. Minimum Requirements for Purchasing. Appendix 10

The best quality assurance for meat and animal feed comes from the Netherlands

Economic Analysis of Animal Agriculture

EMISSIONS FROM LIVESTOCK AND MANURE MANAGEMENT

Agronomy Facts 54 Pennsylvania s Nutrient Management Act (Act 38): Who Is Affected?

Revised Estimated Returns Series Beginning in 2007

ORDINANCE NO. 1. A large concentrated animal feeding operation as described in Table 1 in Section 3.07.

Tennessee Beef Cattle Improvement Initiative

June 23, 2016 Files: #16-01 & #16-02

UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS International General Certificate of Secondary Education AGRICULTURE 0600/02

ACQUISITION OF HYDROPONIC GREEN FODDER CULTIVATION EQUIPMENT (AG)

Horses, donkeys and ducks: identifying key trends in other livestock and poultry

CP Foods Russia. Company s profile. October 2017

Working Group Agriculture and Environment March 2011 Agri-environmental data needs

Introduction. Fertiliser. Lime. Slurry and Manure

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2017 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

Skills, Competencies and Knowledge

Perspectives of non-gm soybean based value chains in Hungary s livestock industries

Table 1: Nutrient Unit Livestock Information. Summary of Revisions to Table 1 of the Nutrient Management Tables

Livestock Organic System Plan

Swine Production Records

Wetherspoon: food sourcing policies, practices and guidelines

Laurens County 4-H Market Swine Project

2016 Reno County Ag Challenge of Champions Friday, July 22, 2016

Welcome to Donau Soja & Europe Soya!

Sustainable Meat Initiative for Dutch CBL ENGLISH VERSION 1.0_FEB14

PROJECTED COSTS AND RETURNS FOR BEEF CATTLE, DAIRY PRODUCTION, SWINE PRODUCTION AND FORAGE CROPS IN LOUISIANA, 1997

EUROPEAN UNION CATTLE ACCREDITATION SCHEME INFORMATION FOR FARMS

Verified Operations Registry

CALL FOR PROPOSALS Beef Cattle Genetic Enhancement Demonstration Project

LIVESTOCK, POULTRY, LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY PRODUCTS

This qualification has been reviewed. The last date to meet the requirements is 31 December 2018

Comparison of regulatory frameworks of Austria, Germany, France, and South Tyrol for GM free labelling of food products

Coimisiún na Scrúduithe Stáit State Examinations Commission

Farm registration and movement of farm livestock

Missouri Correlations CEV Pathway: Animal Systems Pathway

PROCESSORS, HANDLERS & IMPORTERS

DAIRY & DAIRY GOAT PROJECT RECORD

2018 Union County Livestock Project Record

Final Version December 2015 STANDARD ON THE DEFINITION OF THE GMO-FREE PRODUCTION PROCESSES OF FOOD AND ITS LABELLING

Agriculture, Food & Natural Resources Career Cluster Agricultural Animal Production and Management

FOOD FOR VICTORY * * * * * * * * * *

To Sample or Not? Manure Characterization: A Tri-Provincial Review of Manure Book Values

Pennsylvania s Nutrient Management Act (Act 38):

ORGANIC FARMING, FOOD AND PRODUCTS

Beef production, supply and quality from farm to fork in Europe

Issues in the Animal Agriculture Industry A. Animal Welfare- the humane treatment of animals. 1. Most animal producers and researchers believe in

Contents. In this pack you will find: Contents page (version 1. Mar2017) Non-GMO Project Proof Points (version 1. Mar2017)

Transcription:

Production of ohne Gentechnik Food PART 1: FACILITY PARAMETERS Name of the business, contact person Address Country Province / State / Region County Telephone Email Facility number or other identification Type and size of the business / of the Ohne Gentechnik production (Intended) portion (%) / quantity of the Ohne Gentechnik production Is the business part of a group certification through an organisational structure or a bundler? Indicate legal name. Facilities with a different address / businesses involved in production / cooperation partners (as attachment, if necessary) Staff members of the Ohne Gentechnik sector including their responsibilities; organisational chart (as attachment, if necessary) Other types of certification All print numbers for laying farms and KAT number

PART 2: ANIMAL INVENTORY Please indicate all animals raised in your facility and classify their feed. Animal species / Animal category Dairy cows Heifers/Female calves Young cattle Calves Fattening bulls Mother cows Breeding bull Sows with farrows Gilts Fattening pigs Boars Ewes with offspring Capacity / number Minimum conversion feeding period ensured* labelled as genetically modified Feed not labelled as genetically modified Goats Laying hens Chicken fattening Turkey fattening Ducks Geese Rabbits Game Horses Other animal categories:

PART 2: ANIMAL INVENTORY * Comments on the purchase and conversion feeding periods, or the feeding of individual animal categories: Which concrete measures will guarantee compliance with the minimal feeding period? Also make note, if needed, separately, for which animal species/animal category there was no purchase of additional animals or whether only converted animals were purchased.

PART 3: FEED LIST Please indicate all feedstuffs present in the facility. Please keep this overview always updated by listing newly added feedstuffs / suppliers and deleting those no longer in use. After the initial assessment, in case of additions / deletions, please indicate always the date from when on the feed was added or is no longer used (variation date). If separate documents, lists or systems are used, then please note the name of the proof in the following table. Exact name of the feed Own production Purchased (supplier and address) Animal species Proof of no GMO use in feed or seed Variation date

PART 4: LIST OF FEED RATIONS FOR THE OHNE GENTECHNIK PRODUCTION Please state the rations for all animal species here as well as the respective life phases that are within the scope of the Ohne Gentechnik production. You do not need to enter changes of the amount or content of feed components that occurred during the year. It is, however, important that the feed components per animal species are known and documented and that their origin is clear. If separate documents, lists or systems are used, then please note the name of the proof in the following table. Animal species / life phase: Feed component Percentage (approximately, e.g. TM) Purchased Own production For purchased feed components (e. g. mineral feed, single component feed, etc.) please indicate the exact product name according to the declaration on the bag tag or product data sheet and include the declaration in the file. Remarks:

PART 5: CARRYOVER, COMMINGLING AND SWAPPING 1. Are there any genetically modified feedstuffs also for a limited time - on the premises? No. Please continue with part 5; Other circumstances... Yes, the following feed for the following animal species / animal categories: Animal species / animal category Exact name of the feed 2. Is there a regular switch between Ohne Gentechnik feeding and feeding with animal feed labelled in accordance with Regulation (EC) No. 1829/2003 and No. 1830/2003 in one operating unit/section? No. Yes, there is a regular switch in the following sections: Animal species / animal category Business section / stable Time of the switch (age of the animal in weeks) 3. The risk of carryover of genetically modified feed or mixing or interchanging it with feed appropriate for GMO-free production is excluded due to the implementation of the following measures. Please describe the precise measures taken and add plans of storage facilities, feed production facilities, transport routes and feeding facilities as well as stables. Delivery:

PART 5: CARRYOVER, COMMINGLING AND SWAPPING Filling facilities: Storage: Mixing:

PART 5: CARRYOVER, COMMINGLING AND SWAPPING Handling (feed wagons, means of transportation, buckets, shovels, etc.): Feeding (safeguarding that the animal species fed on GMO-free feed do not receive feed or feed components that are genetically modified): Other circumstances that may lead to commingling and swapping on the premises and how they are prevented:

PART 5: CARRYOVER, COMMINGLING AND SWAPPING 4. Carryover by the cultivation of genetically modified plants on the farm or its surroundings. In the case of cultivation on the farm: Are any certificates at hand stating the seed to be GMO-free? (Not relevant for cultures that must not be cultivated if genetically modified. In this case, please state with N/A) No Yes: N/A Are any genetically modified plants cultivated on the farm? (This question is relevant if commercial cultivation of genetically modified plants is authorised in the country where the farm is located.) No Yes: Are there, according to an official GMO location register, any cultivation areas of genetically modified plants within 5 km (including field trials; can also be examined by auditor)? No Yes: If yes: At exactly what distance are these fields located and which measures are taken to exclude carryover:

PART 6: EXTERNAL SERVICE PROVIDERS Please indicate all businesses that provide services for your facility in connection with feed and seed for feed, listing them with their exact name and address. Please also record which measures have been taken in order to prevent carryover or mixing. 1. Mobile grinding and compounding facilities 2. Machinery syndicate (please state also services provided) 3. Desiccation facilities

PART 6: EXTERNAL SERVICE PROVIDERS 4. Forwarding companies 5. Further entities / businesses including machinery / facilities that are used jointly with neighbours and neighbourly help.

s SECTION 7: PROTECTION THROUGH SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS Please describe the business s risk-targeted internal sampling and analysis procedures with regard to GMOs. How is the business s internal sampling and analysis plan recorded? How is sampling and storage of the retention samples done? Which laboratory is commissioned and what scope of analysis is considered? SECTION 8: MARKETING How is marking for GMO-free products organised? Through direct marketing? How are independently marketed products reported annually to the organisational structure, bundlers or VLOG? ; DATE ; DATE

s SECTION 9: CURRENT EVALUATION OF THE BUSINESS After examination of the facility description and the on-site check, the auditor or examiner recommends grading into a risk category. The certification body undertakes the final grading upon examination of the documents. Examiner of the organisational Auditor Evaluator /Certifier: structure / the bundler (in case of group certification) Risk category Recommendation: Grading: Grading: Date Signature Comment / reasons: Yearly update of the facility description by the business within the scope of self-monitoring: The relevant parts of the facility description were changed, if necessary, and are now up to date. Year of examination Business Examiner (Name, Function) Date Signature Auditor Name Recommendation Risk category Date Signature