Profitability of small manure plants

Similar documents
Waste-to-Biogas: raw material, economical and organizational aspects

International Development in Biogas Utilization

Direct marketing and financing, DFBEE Paris, Peter Schünemann-Plag Chamber of Agriculture in Lower Saxony, Germany

Biogas Market in Germany and its Main Drivers

Legal framework, policy developments and support schemes on renewable energy in the German biogas sector

Animal Waste based Biogas Potential in Turkey

Research & Development Support in the Field of Biogas Production and Utilization

Feasible Solutions for Application of the Biogas Production from the Agriculture Waste in Armenia

PlanET Biogas Global GmbH

EnviFarm Biogas plants for agriculture.

Manures use for energy and disposal regulations

EnviFarm Biogas plants for agriculture 1 / 1

TECHNOLOGIES FOR BIOGAS PRODUCTION IN AGRICULTURE OF LATVIA

Biogas Heating Networks

Impact of support incentives on biogas market - Experiences from Germany

Big>East Mobilisation Campaign. 20 October 2009, Athens, Greece. Current situation and outlook on biogas market in Germany

Policies for Anaerobic Digestion in Europe

Is Biomethane Your Best Option? Energy Now Expo 8th February 2017 Mike McLaughlin

Germany - National Energy Policies Supporting AD

Reglementary developments about biogas Gérard DENOYER Renewable Energy Office Ministry for the Ecological and Inclusive Transition

Mono-fermentation of Energy Crops - Experience from the Biogas Plant in Obernjesa

Renewables Update Argyll, Nov John Farquhar Senior Renewables Consultant

Experiences with a Farmstead Biogas Plant

legislative framework

Two phase anaerobic digestion

C.J Banks, A.M. Salter and M Chesshire. 7 th International Symposium on Waste Management Problems in Agro-Industries Amsterdam th September 2006

DIGESTING FIBRUOUS MATERIALS AND WASTE IN MULTI STAGE BIOGAS PLANTS

Financing mechanisms for biogas projects in Central and Eastern Europe

Bioenergy in Germany: Experiences and success factors for market development

Brent Gloy, April

Grass/Cattle Manure as feedstock for AD plants

Maryam Bakhshi AvH Climate Protection Fellow Host: Dr. Behrooz Abdolvand MONA CONSULTANTS.

Our experience for your success

Business Development Michael Dörr Karlshof - Landwirtschaft 2

Expert training train the trainer

Biogas energy produced with

Sustainable small-scale biogas production from agrofood waste for energy self-sufficiency

Sustainable small-scale biogas production from agrofood waste for energy self-sufficiency. Live-Webinar, 12th November 2014

International Conference of Sustainability Science Tokyo, 2009

Anaerobic Digestion Exploring the UK opportunity. A comparison of the markets in Germany and UK

Financial Incentives for anaerobic digestion

Company Presentation. Weber Entec GmbH & Co.KG. Jakarta

2009 EEG Payment Provisions

Biogas Policy Recommendations

Anaerobic Digestion First steps in Developing an on farm AD project

Expert training. The use of the offline expert feasibility calculator for small scale digestion. Berry de Jong (CCS)

Expérience allemande: politique et appresentissage technologique

Biogas Situation in the Netherlands

Investment project biogas plant for electricity production (2,57 Mw el ) Oleg Iovzhenko - Manager of biogas and water treatment projects

Training on biogas and biomethane

BIOGAS PLANT CONSTRUCTION

The German Energy Transition and Biogas: Technologies, market development and project examples. Markus Fuerst 20/03/2018 Jakarta

GREEN INITIATIVES FOR THE SWINE SECTOR

CONVION September 21, 2016 Nordic Biogas 2016 Tuomas Hakala Public

Biogas study tour report

Future Investments in Biogas: UK

1. Under 60k SO Farm Business Income ( per farm)

Operational Results of an Agricultural Biogas Plant Equipped with Modern Instrumentation and Automation. J. Wiese and O. Kujawski

INCREASE OF BIOGAS YIELD THROUGH ULTRASOUND

Biogas Fuel Source for a Renewable Future. Jan Buijk (416)

Biogas report from Austria: Possible phase out of FIT and perspectives how to proceed

INCREASE OF BIOGAS YIELD THROUGH ULTRASOUND

National Renewable Energy Action Plan for Germany and other actions for Greenhouse Gas reduction

WP 3.3: Policy Roadmap for small-scale biogas implementation in Slovenia

Measuring And Explaining Productivity Growth Of Renewable Energy Producers: The case of Austrian Biogas plants

ACEEE Forum on Energy Efficiency in Agriculture Des Moines, IA November 16, 2005

Lessons Learned About Anaerobic Digestion

BIOGAS PRODUCTION POTENTIAL FROM AGRICULTURAL BIOMASS AND ORGANIC RESIDUES IN LATVIA

Green Electricity in Austria - Summary 2010

The Kindersley Centre, Berkshire November 29 th & 30 th 2006

Economic Models for Environmental Sustainability Anaerobic Digesters and a Complimentary Energy Decision Support Tool.

What is CowLab TM? The unique research environment that utilizes latest technology in milk production

Bioenergy in Austria. DI Stephan Grausam. Vienna, 29 May 2006

The Uilenkraal Bio-gas Power Generation Plant

ABE 482 Environmental Engineering in Biosystems. September 22 Lecture 8

Availability and viability of small on-farm biogas plants

Summary sheet - fuel measurement and sampling procedures Version 1

Biogas for Enabling Private Sector Growth and Equity in Senegal and the sub region in NEPAD Workshop «African BioEnergy Investment in

Life cycle analysis and overall GHG emissions saved by biogas

PlanET Biogas Global GmbH

Long-term changes in soil nutrients and grass/clover yields on Tingvoll farm

Fugitive methane emissions from biogas facilities

AB 32 and Agriculture

STATUS & TRENDS IN INDIA

Policies for Anaerobic Digestion in Europe. GMI Agriculture Subcommittee Meeting Florianopolis, Brazil, 13 March 2014

UNDP/GEF PROJECT: REDUCING BARRIERS TO ACCELERATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE BIOMASS MARKET IN SERBIA

Research RES LEGAL Support system Country: Germany

Sustainable Biogas Market Central and Eastern Europe

Country profile and actions in BiogasAction. Latvia

28 th March Green Farm Project Workshop John Toner Group Chairman & CEO

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION. Marco Poliafico WINACC

Auf in neue Märkte! Exportinitiative Energie Biogas in future energy systems Example Germany Dr. Stefan Rauh, 21. November 2017, Warschau

Making the most of a sustainable future. Biomethane and a Smart Sustainable Energy Infrastructure. agriad Ltd Sept 2016

Renewable Energy Sources Act. Progress Report 2007

SCANDRIA Workshop February The current political obstacles towards the introduction of biogas for the road transport

Actuality and perspectives of using of the biogas technology in Uzbekistan Nasriddin Najimov

Wageningen University and Research Centre Department of Social Science Business Economics Group

DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES FOR BIOGAS PRODUCTION FROM AGRICULTURAL WASTES IN FRIULI VENEZIA GIULIA (NORTH- EAST OF ITALY)

Energy Efficiency in Energy Crop Digestion

Canadian Biogas Metrics Study: Quantifying the Economic, Environmental and Social Benefits of Biogas Energy in Canada

Transcription:

BLOCK 2.1.: SMALL (MANURE) PLANTS - AN OPPORTUNITY FOR (ORGANIC) FARMS?! Bremen, 27 th January 2015 Profitability of small manure plants Robert Wagner C.A.R.M.E.N. e.v.

C.A.R.M.E.N. E.V. Coordinator for energy crops, renewable energies and energy efficiency in the rural area Founded in1992 70 members around 35 employees consulting, public relations and project management in the chemical and energetic use of energy crops and renewable energies In order of the Bavarian Ministry of State for Food, Agriculture and Forestry And also in order of the Bavarian Ministry of State for Economy, Media, Energies and Technology 2

FRAMEWORK 46 EEG 2014 digestion of manure Used value: 23,73 CENT/kWhe Real feed-in tariff : 23,53 CENT/kWke Degression is beginning in 2016 Electricity has to be produced at the place of biogas production Installed electricity power 75 kwe in maximum Per calendar year: 80 mass-% manure-eu 1069, manure of poultry is not possible 9 EEG 2014 technical specifications 150 days retention period - gas tight if there are used other substrates than manure-eu1069 New built storages für digest have to be gas tight at the place of biogas production No management of the feed Registration in the plant register Perhaps other requirements of the authorities

VERSIONS 1. 100 mass% manure of milk cow, F: 30 d, GPL: 0 d 2. 84 % / 16 % = manure of milk cow/ energy crops, F: 70 d, GPL: 90 d 3. 50% / 34% / 16 % = manure of milk cow/ mist of cattle/ energy crops, F: 70 d, GPL: 90 d 4. 90 % / 10 % = manure of milk cow/ mist of cattle, F: 50 d, GPL: 0 or 90 d 30 / 50 / 75 kw e F: digestor, GPL: storage for digestate, d: days

DATA ON MEDIA data on media Price base variante beginning at the plant Dry matter /organic dry matter-content biogas yield (BG) Methane (M) In /ton in % in m³bg/ton organic dry matter Mize silage 40 (covered) 34,0 / 95,0 650 52,0 % Mist of cattles 1,00 25,0 / 85,0 450 55,0 % Manure of milk cows 0,50 7,5 / 80,0 380 55,0 % Source: Gasausbeute in landwirtschaftlichen Betrieben, KTBL-Heft 88, 2. überarbeitete Auflage. Darmstadt: 2010

MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE LIFE position Maintenance service life Buildings, ways 1,0% per year of investment 20 y Planning, approval 20 y CHP otto-engine 40 % Source: ASUE BHKW- 8 y CHP rest 60 % Kenndaten, 50 % of hole 12 y maintenance agitator 7,0% per year of investment 10 y feeder 7,0% per year of investment 7 y Other technical components - 7,0% per year of investment 7 y high Other technical components - low 3,0% per year of investment 12 y

KEY DATA Economic key data definition return on assets = (yield + interest rate ) / (investment/ 2) Gewinn = Proceeds - costs annuity depriciation Electrical production Electricity / installed electrical rate power

100 % MANURE OF MILK COWS sice production animals investment yield Return on assets 30 kwe 258 GV 240 T 11 t /y 12,7 % 50 kwe 397 GV 328 T 29 t /y 22,5 % 75 kwe 553 GV 419 T 57 t /y 32,0 % GV: units of big production animals t : 1000

100 % MANURE OF MILK COWS sice 30 kwe, 258 GV investment yield Return on assets Base line 240 T 10 t /y 12,7 % investment-20 % 192 T 15 t /y 20,8 % Investment +20 % 288 T 4 t /y 7,3 % Methane/ elecricity - 20 % 0 t /y 5,0 % 240 T Methane/ elecricity +10 % 14 t /y 16,6 % Manure 0 13 t /y 15,4 % 240 T Manure 4-13 t /y -6,0 % GV: units of big production animals t : 1000

84% MANURE OF COWS/ 16 % ENERGY CROPS sice producti on animals investment yield Return on assets 30 kwe 96 GV 320 t - 21 t /y 50 kwe 151 GV 431 t -13 t /y 75 kwe 213 GV 553 t + 1 t /y (39 t /y costs for energy crops) 5,1 % GV: units of big production animals t : 1000

50 % MANURE OF COWS/ 34 % MIST OF CATTLE / 16 % ENERGY CROPS sice production animals 30 kwe 39 GV + 665 ton/y 50 kwe 60 GV + 1025 ton/y 75 kwe 84 GV + 1429 ton/y investment yield Return on assets 304 t -12 t /y 411 t - 3 t /y 528 t 15 t /y 10,5 % GV: units of big production animals t : 1000

50 % MANURE OF COWS/ 34 % MIST OF CATTLE / 16 % ENERGIE CROPS size 75 kwe 84 GV + 1429 ton/y investment yield Return on assets Base line 528 t 15 t /y 10,5 % investment-20 % 423 t 29 t /y 18,3 % Investment +20 % 634 t 2 t /y 5,3 % Methane/ elecricity -20 % 528 t - 9 t /y Methane/ elecricity +10 % 27 t /y 15,0 % Costs for substrates -20 % 21 t /y 12,6 % 528 t Costs for substrates + 20 % 9 t /y 8,3 % GV: units of big production animals t : 1000

90% MANURE OF COWS/ 10% MIST OF CATTLE sice 30 kwe 30 kwe without digestate storage 50 kwe 50 kwe without digestate storage product ion animals 174 GV + 500 ton/y 269 GV + 772 ton/y investme nt yield 359 t -6 t /y 278 t 1 t /y Return on assets 464 t 10 t /y 9,0 % 367 t 18 t /y 14,8 % 75 kwe 374 GV + 75 kwe without 1073 digestate storage ton/y 589 t 34 t /y 16,4 % 454 tt 46 t /y 25,0 % GV: units of big production animals t : 1000

90% MANURE OF COWS/ 10% MIST OF CATTLE sice 50 kwe, 269 GV + 772 ton/y investment yield Return on assets Base line 464 t 10 t /y 9,0 % investment-20 % 371 t 21 t /y 16,2 % Investment +20 % 557 t -2 t /y Methane/ elecricity -20 % -6 t /y 464 t Methane/ elecricity +10 % 17 t /y 12,3 % Costs for substrates -20 % 11 t /y 9,3 % 464 t Costs for substrates + 20 % 9 t /y 8,6 % GV: units of big production animals t : 1000

CONCLUSION pure manure plants are profitable according of Investment, methane/electricity and costs for manure plants on base of manure and energy crops are not profitable energy crops 40 per ton manure mist energy crops plants are profitable at 75 kwe according of Investment and methane/electricity manure mist plants are profitable at 50 or 75 kwe according of Investment and methane/electricity, perhaps a storage for digestate is not necessary

Thank you very much for your kind attention. questions??? RW(at)CARMEN-EV.DE

DEFINITIONS term Definition depriciation On base on the service life interest rate 4,0 % Service for the plant FNR Leitfaden Biogas 2010 15,00 /hour fibers: + 1 minutes/day Investment clamp silo presumption: already available Investment for digestors and agitators KTBL Betriebsplanung Landwirtschaft 08/09 plus 10 % requirement hygiene Costs for application digestate out of energy crops Costs for application digestate out of manure and mist CHP given period CHP guarantee of payment of a loan for retreating plant Costs for electricity for the plant Feed electricity Electrical production rate Maintenance Presumption: no additional investment or no additional costs 0,00 /m³ 0,00 /m³ around 8000 hours per year An average year Otto-engine 0 per year small manure plant Biogas plant in order to 46 EEG 2014 Specific waste production from milk cows 68 l/gv/day Specific biogas yield an specific methane content Feed in tariff 0,20 /kwhe Up to 75 kwe in the low voltage system no additional investment and no loss for transformation = electricity / biogas energy Electrical efficiency ASUE BHKW Kenndaten, minus. 5 %, minus rate for praxis includes costs for servicing, inspection, repair, and troubleshooting KTBL Gasausbeuten in landwirtschaftlichen Biogasanlagen, Empfehlungen 23,53 Cent/kWhe

DEFINITIONS term net calorific value methane insurance Costs for stored substrates Using of heat Costs for planning Definition 9,97 kwh/m³ 0,5 % per year according the investment 1,5 % of 50 % of the stored material Not in the baseline 4 % of the investment