Home Built to LEED- H Silver Standards Monmouth County, NJ

Similar documents
MASSEY HOFFMAN ARCHITECTS

Least Cost Path to Achieving 50% Reduction in Residential Energy Use (in Heating Climates)

Multifamily Stories and Type R-1. R-2. R-3. R-4

Project location includes access to existing roads, existing water and wastewater infrastructure, and within or contiguous to existing development.

4043 N. Ravenswood Suite 207 Chicago, IL

Green Remodeling Illustrations GREEN REMODELING ILLUSTRATIONS GREEN BUILDING GUIDELINES FOR HOME REMODELING

2011 Enterprise Green Communities Criteria Checklist

FEBRUARY 22, GREEN BUILDING: Past, Present and Future

Urban Revitalization Plan For Responsible and Sustainable Growth and Development City of Adel, Iowa

ENERGY STAR Qualified Homes National Program Requirements, Version 3.0

Chapter Four: Green Remodeling Illustrations

PACKARD HOUSE 2010 LEED-NC GOLD PENDING PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS

Case Study: Element PROJECT DESCRIPTION


14 Maple Avenue Morristown, NJ

Overview of Green Home

Beyond Code Building Programs. What They are, and What They can Mean to Your Community

CONTENTS. 71 Section 01352, #7 (Life Cycle Cost and Life Cycle Assessment) 2/1/12 Modified entire section 72 Section 01352, #8 (Sustainability

Ecole Connaught Community School Welcomes. CaGBC Sask Chapter Members & Colleagues

Classic Competition Weiting Residence

Evergreen Project Implementation Plan Instructions Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program

88.2% 32% 23% WEITZ LABORATORY GOLD. PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS LEED Facts. of on-site generated construction waste was diverted from landfills.

Green Building Ordinance Overview

2017 Incentive Policies for Housing and Economic Development. Notice of Revision

Taylor Institute. LEED Certification : GOLD

LEED & INCENTIVES. Alison Y. Rivenburgh, LEED AP

LEED for Homes Project Checklist

Future tree planting on the two acre lot will offset remaining lifetime carbon emissions.

Energy Star Qualified - New Homes

Single Family Homes - over 3,000 sqft. Parfitt Residence

FOR ADDITIONS and REMODELS Before filling out this application, read Green Building & Green Points Guideline Booklet for more in-depth information.

LEED v4 for Homes, Residential Project Summary and Checklist One and Two Family New Construction

Chapter 4 - Energy Conservation

PACE for Homeowners. Website: paceab.green October 29, 2017

California HERO Program Residential Eligible Product List All Products

COMMISSIONING, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

All Things Green Madison Public Library Central

Springdale Creek Springdale Road Austin Tx Price range: $480s-660s. For More Information. Juan Pablo Hisse Sales Consultant

Energy Efficient Health Centres 2018

Your Zero Energy Ready Home Story

6 S USTAINABLE D EVELOPMENT

37% 100% 100% PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS LEED Facts. Wiener Auditorium

BPE Case study of Pippin Close and Barnlea Close

Green Building. Chapter 9. Chapter 9. Included in this chapter. Green building at home Green building certification programs

Chapter 10 - Energy Conservation

Informing the Debate

Container Home Presentation Book 4

APPENDIX B RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DETAILS

Morning Glory Meadows 8345 North Morning Glory Road Paradise Valley, Arizona

HERO Program Residential Eligible Product List California Residential Eligible Products... 2

NET-ZERO-ENERGY RESIDENCE :: SEATTLE, WA Architecture 632: High-Performance Buildings; Ball State University; Fall 2015; Christopher Padgett

Green Charrette BANCROFT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GREEN CHARRETTE

Robita Commons. 1 Robita St, Price range: $579,900 - $649,900. For More Information Richard Fowler. Sales Consultant

Sustainable Living. 4DCompanies Village Walk Drive Henderson NV

High Performance Consideration Columbia City Home

EnerSmart Programs Rethinking buildings for sustainability and self-sufficiency

Analysis 1. LEED Analysis of Laboratory Buildings. Penn State School of Forest Resources University Park, PA

GREEN RESIDENTIAL HOME STUDY: A SHORE COMMUNITY IN NEW JERSEY

Sonoma County Energy Independence Program APPENDIX A ELIGIBLE IMPROVEMENTS

A Performance Based ENERGY STAR Homes Program: The Wisconsin ENERGY STAR Homes Perspective

Homes. Plan Review Input Form. Office Use: P l an Rev iew Contro l Nu mb er

Single Family Homes less than 3,000 sq.ft.

43% reduction in water use below code maximum 100% 100% 14% reduction in lighting power density. 56% of offices have thermal comfort controls 100%

beinspired to live green

Appendix B. Certification of Intent to Comply

Castle Court Terrace B Castle Court, Price range: $624,900 - $724,900. For More Information. Richard Fowler Sales Consultant

The Numerous Benefits of Energy Efficient Practices

Presented by: Eco-$mart, Inc. An EPA ENERGY STAR Ally

Santa Fe County Sustainable Land Development Code ORDINANCE NO , December 8, 2015

Instant discount of 33% off improvement cost, up to $1,250 Plus, potential savings bonus of up to $250 (**)

LIVE GREEN ENERGY EFFICIENT. costs less 365 days a year. Energy Management System. Owning a Palm Harbor home.

Willowbend. Model Coming Soon Price range: $268k-$354k. For More Information. Will Conrad Sales Consultant

Kansas City Residents Buying 2012 IECC Homes Will Save Thousands

LEED Certified Health Center

NYSERDA High Performance Development Challenge Energy Monitoring Report Hudson Passive Project

Pocono Builders Association 2014 Building Awards Environmental/Energy Efficiency

Laurel School Upper Campus Building Features

Lincoln Public Schools

BALANCING ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND THERMAL COMFORT

The Lower The HERS Score The Better. Tight Building Envelope. Renewable Energy Sources. Materials & Waste Management. Energy Efficient Lighting

Date Rater Verified. Rater Verified. Slab / Pre-Drywall / Thermal Inspection

SIP Homes: Built for a Lifetime of Comfort and Value

Project Summary. Sustainability Facts. LEED for New Construction Rating (out of 69 possible points) Total Score 40 Sustainable Sites 7

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Seal and Insulate with ENERGY STAR

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Seal and Insulate with ENERGY STAR

Sustainable Residential Policies Mayfield West Phase Two

Life Cycle Cost Analysis of the New NJMC Building

burnsville green guide green remodeling strategies to save you money while improving your health and reducing the environmental impacts of your home

Creating a Better Tomorrow. Sustainable initiatives for better healing and better living

LEED 2009 for New Construction and Major Renovations

Culver City Building Safety Division Mandatory Green Building Program

High Performance Consideration In Law House

Energy Efficiency. Understanding R-value, Mass Walls, Continuous Insulation and Air Tightness By Bautex Systems, LLC

Energy Efficiency Solutions for Multifamily Housing. Clark Energy Group LLC

This page has been left blank intentionally.

Selecting Energy Efficient New Windows in Tennessee

City of Millbrae 2016 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE CHECKLIST FOR NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS

Principles of Green Architecture

Eaton Center - Shanghai LEED CI Certification Project

About Shirey Contracting

Transcription:

The project is one of three single-family homes built by Fluid Construction between 2006 and 2008, each built to an increasingly more robust green building standard. This home was built to LEED-H Silver standards, although the LEED submittal process has not been completed. The home is ENERGY STAR certified. Home Built to LEED- H Silver Standards Monmouth County, NJ After having owned and occupied this home built to LEED-H Silver standards for two years, the homeowners stated unequivocally that they would recommend purchasing a home such as this to friends. On a five point scale with 5 being the highest, they rated the day lighting features of the home a 5, the low-flow fixtures a 5, the thermal comfort a 4, the indoor air quality a 5, and their overall satisfaction with the home a 5. 1

Project Team General Contractor: Fluid Construction Architect: Debra L. Stoever Energy Consulting Firm: MaGrann Associates to the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) 2006. Given that heating constitutes more than 50 percent of an average home s energy use in the Middle-Atlantic Region, the home s reduced natural gas consumption is noteworthy. Location of Project: Monmouth County, NJ Overview This home built to LEED-H Silver standards in Monmouth County, NJ was completed in July of 2008, occupied in November 2008 and is currently home to two adults and two small children. It was built by Fluid Construction as the third in a series of three progressively more energy efficient homes in the area. The home built to LEED-H Silver standards was built on a previously developed site in a residential neighborhood. Transportation The home built to LEED-H Silver standards is within walking distance of the town s downtown area and there is a NJ Transit bus stop nearby. There are also train and ferry services to New York City within seven miles of the home. However, transportation considerations were not a major part of the project. Water Consumption and Appliances The home built to LEED-H Silver standards was outfitted with high-efficiency water fixtures and fittings as well as ENERGY STAR appliances and lighting that have greatly reduced water and energy consumption when compared to a home without these improvements. As for water efficiency, the home is equipped with 1.5 gallons per minute (gpm) low-flow faucets in the kitchen and bathrooms, 2.0 gpm low-flow showerheads, and dual-flush 1.6/0.8 gallons per flush toilets. The homeowners are very pleased with the low flow fixtures and had no complaints, rating their satisfaction as a 5 on a 5-point scale. All of the major appliances in the home built to LEED-H Silver standards are ENERGY STAR qualified, which use 10-50% less energy than standard appliances. Seventy-five percent of the lighting in the home is also ENERGY STAR certified, which use 75% less energy and produce 75% less heat than conventional lighting systems, which in turn reducing cooling loads. Again, the homeowners were very satisfied with the appliances in the home with the exception of the front-loading washing machine, which often required additional water to ensure adequate cleaning, especially when washing heavily soiled items. As part of a two-year study, the Rutgers Center for Green Building (RCGB) found that the home built to LEED-H Silver standards used 8% less electricity and 52% less natural gas per square foot per year than a typical single family home in the area built Envelope, Heating and Cooling The home built to LEED-H Silver standards is outfitted with superior building envelope technologies including a closedcell spray-applied polyurethane foam insulation system which achieves an R-value of 6 per inch thickness and provides almostzero air permeability. It uses advanced 2 x 6 wood framing spaced at 24 throughout the house. It is equipped with two super high-efficiency air-conditioning units with a seasonal energy efficiency rating (SEER) of 18, which are about 30% more efficient than the federally mandated SEER 13 units, and a five-zone, fuelfired hydronic distribution boiler for radiant heat with an annual fuel utilization efficiency (AFUE) rating of 95%, well above the AFUE of 80% required by federal regulation. The combined building envelope and the superior cooling system help keep temperatures within a comfortable range on even the hottest days of the summer. For example, on the hottest day during the summer of 2009, the home s indoor temperature fluctuated within a range of only 4-5 degrees Fahrenheit. For this reason, the homeowners were very pleased with the thermal comfort of the home, noting that it was unnecessary to adjust the thermostat very often. The home was also designed to take full advantage of the seasonal courses of the sun to reduce excessive heating in the summer and utilize the limited sunlight in the winter. The southern face has the most and largest of the windows and glass doors in the house; overhangs were installed over each of the windows to prevent the summer sun from penetrating the home, but allow the winter sun to come in. The homeowners did mention that the sun during the winter was sometimes too much, but were happy with the sun during the summer. They have also planted deciduous trees in the southern yard to help reduce the amount of summer sun that reaches the house. 2

Ratings and Awards Built to USGBC LEED Silver Standards ENERGY STAR Certified Interior and Operations Throughout the home built to LEED-H Silver standards, bamboo wood flooring was used and low or no-voc paints were used throughout the building to reduce toxic off-gassing. An indoor air quality test was conducted at the home that found that all of the VOCs tested for were within the normal range for New Jersey. Indoor air quality is of particular importance to the homeowners and as a result, they use green, environmentally friendly cleaners or natural cleaners with low levels of VOCs nearly all of the time. The home also uses bamboo flooring throughout the house about which the homeowners expressed some concerns. They did not believe it was holding up to the rigors of daily use by two children as well as they had hoped. The overall operation of the home built to LEED-H Silver standards requires minimal effort. The heating and cooling systems are controlled by a digital thermostat that is programmable to conform to the occupants thermal preferences and can be adjusted remotely via the Internet. Overall, the homeowners were satisfied with the capacity to control the heating and cooling systems, though sometimes had difficulties navigating the menus and options of the thermostat. Process Design The home built to LEED-H Silver standards was the third progressively more green home built by Fluid Construction in the same area. Prior to this, Fluid Construction worked on homes built to the standard code, but realized the potential benefits of building green. He was able to convince the homeowners of the value of a green design. Build The general contractor was responsible for ensuring the home, as built, met the criteria outlined in the LEED-H checklist. Operate As mentioned above, the home built to LEED-H Silver standards requires minimal active operation on the part of the homeowners. They did mention that they were pleased with how little they had to use their heat and were impressed with how well the home maintained the indoor temperature. The homeowners did experience extremely low levels of humidity during the winter of 2008/2009 as a building-wide humidifier was not installed at the outset. They had purchased several humidifiers for the bedrooms, but eventually had a home-wide system installed in order to bring the home s humidity up to their desired level. Evaluate As mentioned above, the home built to LEED-H Silver standards was one of three newly built homes in the Monmouth County that was part of a two-year, post-occupancy evaluation conducted by the RCGB. The study included an analysis of monthly electric and natural gas bills as well as quarterly water bills. A full life-cycle costing (LCC) analysis was completed as well as a life cycle environmental impact assessment (LCA). The homeowners were also interviewed twice during the study in order to ascertain user habits and preferences as well as satisfaction levels. Finance A life-cycle cost (LCC) analysis was conducted on the home built to LEED-H Silver standards in order to evaluate whether the energy efficient features included in the design are worthwhile in an economic sense over from the home s construction to its demolition. Considerations of homeowner satisfaction, comfort, or environmental benefits are not taken into account. Again, the REM/RATE model was used to project the home s annual enduse consumption and cost for electricity and natural gas and compared to an average, mid-atlantic detached single family home built to the IECC 2006 standards. The home built to LEED-H Silver standards, as designed, was expected to consume 33% less electricity and 49% less natural gas than an average IECC 2006 home and, as mentioned above, actually used 8% less electricity and 52% less natural gas. These increased efficiencies did come at an extra cost. As built, the total initial cost for the appliances, heating and cooling system, windows and insulation of the home built to LEED-H Silver standards was $17.73/sqft as compared $11.99/sqft for the average home, a difference of $5.74/sqft. The largest initial expense was the improved insulation system which accounted for $6.81/sqft or 8% of the initial costs as opposed to $2.97/sqft or 25% for the traditional insulation in the IECC 2006 home. A net present value (NPV) calculation was completed in order to determine the lifetime value of the improved efficiency of the home built to LEED-H Silver standards. The primary analysis assumed a 30-year building lifespan, a discount rate of 7.0% and used a projection for energy prices based on the linear regression equation of historical energy prices from 1992 to present. The price of natural gas projected increase is 2.2% and 4.3% for electricity. Historical energy price data was gathered from U.S. Department of Energy Short Term Energy Outlook. The results found that the NPV of the home built to LEED-H Silver standards was $0.90/sqft greater than that of the average mid-atlantic 3

home. In other words, if the conditions of this analysis hold over the life of the home built to LEED-H Silver standards, the initial investment in energy efficiency improvements will result in a net positive investment when compared with a standard home. In order to mitigate some of the uncertainty of predicting the future, RCGB also conducted a sensitivity analysis varying the home s lifespan, the discount rate, and the energy price escalation rate. The energy price escalation rates are derived from the Department of Energy s Short Term Energy Outlook. Three different energy price scenarios have been calculated. The low projection assumes a 0.0% rate of increase for both natural gas and electricity prices. The medium projection is based on the historical increase in energy prices from 1992-2010. The medium growth natural gas price rate is 2.2% and 1.3% for electricity. The high projection is based on the percentage change over between 2000 and 2010. The high growth natural gas price rate is 4.3% and 3.3% for electricity. The results are as follows: Building Lifespan Energy Price Escalation Rate Discount Rate 5.26% 7.00% 12.00% 15 Years Low -$1.33 -$1.80 -$2.80 Medium -$0.69 -$1.26 -$2.44 High -$0.17 -$0.53 -$1.97 30 Years Low $0.72 -$0.37 -$2.26 Medium $2.42 $0.90 $1.64 High $5.13 $2.90 -$0.71 50 Years Low $1.82 $0.21 -$2.15 Medium $4.71 $2.12 -$1.42 High $10.32 $5.62 -$0.25 Performance The RCGB has collected utility bills from the homeowner between November 2008 and October 2010 to assess the building performance. Based on an analysis of those bills, it was found that the home built to LEED-H Silver standards is performing better than expected in terms of natural gas use, but slightly worse than expected in terms of electricity consumption. Based on a building model created using REM/RATE software, the home built to LEED-H Silver standards was expected to use 0.21 therms/sqft/ year but in actuality used 0.20 therms/sqft /year a 5% difference. In terms of electricity, the home was expected to use 2.5 kwh/sqft /year but actually used 3.1 kwh/sqft /year about 24% higher than anticipated. These numbers differ from those cited above as these are comparing the actual natural gas and electricity consumption of the home built to LEED-H Silver standards with the expected consumption of the home as modeled in REM/ RATE while above, the actual use was being compared to a modeled home built to the IECC 2006 standards. More so than natural gas, which has a comparatively limited scoped of use (cooking, water heating, and space heating, the last of these being by far the most significant), electricity is used for many purposes that are exclusively linked to user habits and cannot be mitigated or improved by building design. Most notable is the intensity and frequency of electronic use. Further, extraordinary circumstances that demand large amounts of electricity such as home improvements or the addition of new appliances cannot be fully anticipated in the REM/RATE models. Lessons and Trade-offs Overall, the homeowners are very satisfied with their home and have had few issues in the two years that they have resided there. The greater relative expense of the home is evidently offset by the environmental contribution the homeowners feel they are making by living in such a home. 4

One of the homeowners expressed the increased awareness and environmental responsibility that has grown in every aspect of their lives due to owning a home such as this. List of Green Strategies Design Brownfield and Infill Development Water-Efficient Landscape Design Low-Flow Faucets And Showerheads Dual Flush Toilets Closed-Cell Spray-Applied Polyurethane Foam Insulation System Low-E, Argon Filled Windows Advanced 2X6 24 O.C. Wood Framing Daylighting High Efficiency HVAC Equipment ENERGY STAR Appliances Hydronic Radiant Heating System Indirect Fuel-Fired Hot Water Tank Build Rapidly Renewable Materials: Bamboo Flooring Low VOC Paints And Finishes Indoor Air Quality Management Plan Operate Programmable Thermostat Green Cleaning Evaluate Building Performance Evaluation 5