Joint Logistics Strategic Plan

Similar documents
Defense Business Board

NEC2 Effectiveness and Agility: Analysis Methodology, Metrics, and Experimental Results*

Synergizing Logistics Training and Education EWS Subject Area Training

Contemporary Issue Sense and Respond Logistics Now Submitted by: Captain B.K. Sanchez CG #12, FACAD: Major B.J. Nownes 8 February 2005

This Brief is Unclassified

ITEA LVC Special Session on W&A

Panel 5 - Open Architecture, Open Business Models and Collaboration for Acquisition

Life Cycle Metrics and OSD Oversight: Discipline With Flexibility

Issues for Future Systems Costing

Energy Security: A Global Challenge

Tactical Equipment Maintenance Facilities (TEMF) Update To The Industry Workshop

Trends in Acquisition Workforce. Mr. Jeffrey P. Parsons Executive Director Army Contracting Command

Service Incentive Towards an SOA Friendly Acquisition Process

DoD Environmental Information Technology Management (EITM) Program

Biased Cramer-Rao lower bound calculations for inequality-constrained estimators (Preprint)

AF Future Logistics Concepts

Systems Engineering Processes Applied To Ground Vehicle Integration at US Army Tank Automotive Research, Development, and Engineering Center (TARDEC)

Stakeholder Needs and Expectations

Success with the DoD Mentor Protégé Program

Product Support and Human Capital

NDCEE. Landscape Modeling Technologies for Sustainable Forests. National Defense Center for Energy and Environment. Ms. Donna S.

Towards Better Control of Information Assurance Assessments in Exercise Settings

Alex G. Manganaris Director, Workforce Plans and Resources

Army Quality Assurance & Administration of Strategically Sourced Services

Anti-Corrosion Nanotechnology Solutions for Logistics (ACNS-L)

Supply Chain Modeling: Downstream Risk Assessment Methodology (DRAM)

Agility. David S. Alberts Kathy Conley. April 2015 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Log: H IDA Document NS D-5499

Civilian Applications of UAVs A California Perspective, a Policy Symposium

USMC Environmental and Corrosion Control Issues. Andrew Sheetz USMC CPAC Engineering Manager

Earned Value Management on Firm Fixed Price Contracts: The DoD Perspective

Improvements to Hazardous Materials Audit Program Prove Effective

Robustness of Communication Networks in Complex Environments - A simulations using agent-based modelling

Implementation of the Best in Class Project Management and Contract Management Initiative at the U.S. Department of Energy s Office of Environmental

Fort Belvoir Compliance-Focused EMS. E2S2 Symposium Session June 16, 2010

US Naval Open Systems Architecture Strategy

Improving Strategic Decision and Senior-level Teamwork in U.S. National Security Organizations

SE Tools Overview & Advanced Systems Engineering Lab (ASEL)

Sustainable Management of Available Resources and Technology (SMART) Cleanup

Developing an Army Water Security Strategy

Warstopper Material Supply Chain Risk Assessments

73rd MORSS CD Cover Page UNCLASSIFIED DISCLOSURE FORM CD Presentation

Joint JAA/EUROCONTROL Task- Force on UAVs

Climate Change Adaptation: U.S. Navy Actions in the Face of Uncertainty

Satisfying DoD Contract Reporting With Agile Artifacts

Rigor and Objectivity in T&E

Bio-Response Operational Testing & Evaluation (BOTE) Project

DoD Solid Waste Diversion

Flexible Photovoltaics: An Update

Based on historical data, a large percentage of U.S. military systems struggle to

An Open Strategy for the Acquisition of Models and Simulations. Rudolph P. Darken Director, MOVES Institute

Cataloging Green Items

Applying Software Architecture Principles in a DoD Acquisition

DLA Troop Support Clothing & Textiles

ANALYSIS OF SMALL SCALE CONTINGENCIES LINKING ANALYSIS TO THE SSC PLANNING PROCESS

Identifying and Mitigating Industrial Base Risk for the DoD: Results of a Pilot Study

Joint Logistics in the Next Decade

Deciding in a Complex Environment : Human Performance Modeling of Dislocated Organizations

Geothermal Energy Demonstration at Fort Indiantown Gap

DoD Sustainability Strategy The Latest. Mr. Dave Asiello DUSD(I&E)/CMRM

Traditional Project. Can t We All Get Along

NATO Research & Technology Organization Studies, Analysis and Simulation Panel Lectures Series 222. Computer Generated Forces Future Needs

Army Systems Engineering Career Development Model

Strategic Sustainability Assessment

Diminishing Returns and Policy Options in a Rentier State: Economic Reform and Regime Legitimacy in Saudi Arabia

11. KEYNOTE 2 : Rebuilding the Tower of Babel Better Communication with Standards

Implementing Open Architecture. Dr. Tom Huynh Naval Postgraduate School

Agile Integration of Complex Systems

DoD LVC Architecture Roadmap (LVCAR) Study Status

Reliability and Maintainability (R&M) Engineering Update

PL and Payment of CWA Stormwater Fees

EXPLOSIVE CAPACITY DETERMINATION SYSTEM. The following provides the Guidelines for Use of the QDARC Program for the PC.

From Environmental Science to BMP The Canadian Experience

Developing a More Complete Set of DMSMS Solutions

DoD Installations, Energy and the Environment: The Challenge and Opportunity

Department of Defense Green Procurement Program and Biobased Products

Kelly Black Neptune & Company, Inc.

CORROSION CONTROL Anniston Army Depot

Decision Framework for Incorporation of Sustainability into Army Environmental Remediation Projects

DoD Sustainable Buildings. Col Bart Barnhart ODUSD(I&E) May 12, 2011

SEPG Using the Mission Diagnostic: Lessons Learned. Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213

Addressing Species at Risk Before Listing - MCB Camp Lejeune and Coastal Goldenrod

Systems Engineering Processes Applied To Ground Vehicle Integration at US Army Tank Automotive Research, Development, and Engineering Center (TARDEC)

NDCEE. Ecosystem Banking Best Practices. Elizabeth Keysar, NDCEE/CTC. National Defense Center for Energy and Environment

Ranked Set Sampling: a combination of statistics & expert judgment

Convoy Active Safety Technology - Information Brief

NATO Research & Technology Organization Studies, Analysis and Simulation Panel Lectures Series 222

Medical Chemical and Biological Defense Research

PROACTIVE DMSMS: Part of Integrated Systems Engineering & Life Cycle Product Support Planning. Working Group

STANDARDIZATION DOCUMENTS

Right Person, Right Qualifications, Right Place, Right Time Human Resources (R4 HR) Technology Demonstration Project

Ultraviolet (UV) Curable Coatings DoD Executive for Bullet Agent Tip Identification

16th ICCRTS. Collective C2 in Multinational Civil-Military Operations

DoD CIO Interoperability Process

Army Net Zero Installation Initiative and Cost Benefit Analysis Activity

Requirements Management for the Oceanographic Information System at the Naval Oceanographic Office

Earned Value Management from a Behavioral Perspective ARMY

Aeronautical Systems Center

District Stability Framework (DSF)

Military Health System Conference. PCMH: Making Cultural Change Real Shifting Paradigms and Changing Roles

A Quality Control Procedure Specialized for Incremental Sampling

Transcription:

Joint Logistics Strategic Plan 2010 2014 1

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 2010 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2010 to 00-00-2010 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE J4 Joint Logistics Strategic Plan 2010-2014 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Joint Chiefs of Staff,J4 Logistics,9999 Joint Staff Pentagon,Washington,DC,20318-9999 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 16 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

As the Director for Logistics, I am pleased to present the Joint Staff J-4 Strategic Plan for 2010-2014. Developed through an internal and external collaborative process, this plan outlines the mission, vision, goals, and objectives that will guide and align our activities for the next five years. There are many challenges facing the logistics Community of Interest (COI) and multiple voices woring from their perspectives to provide solutions for the joint warfighter. By coordinating and integrating those perspectives, J-4 sponsors the joint logistician and synchronizes the members of the logistics COI. We facilitate cooperation and advocate solutions, while providing the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff with the best military advice and an awareness of the joint logistics environment. Through alignment with the Chairman s priorities, this strategic plan provides direction for our organization to best complete our mission. It is my vision that J-4 will continue to fulfill our role by creating dynamic logistics; translating adaptive, flexible, and responsive logistics into unconstrained options for the Joint Force Commander. We are in the midst of a critical period in joint logistics, and we must collectively continue to focus on providing leadership and vision to the logistics COI. To do that, we must thin outside traditional lines and produce innovative, effective, and efficient solutions that provide the Joint Force Commander freedom of action. Let s mae dynamic logistics happen! KATHLEEN M. GAINEY Lieutenant General, USA Director for Logistics, J-4

Joint Staff Logistics Directorate (J-4) J-4 integrates logistics planning and execution in support of joint operations to drive joint force readiness, maximize the Joint Force Commander s freedom of action, and advise the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on logistics matters. We wor across the myriad of organizations in the logistics Community of Interest (COI) including the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Services, the Combatant Commands, the industrial base, and our multinational and interagency partners. J-4 is structured into two cross-functional groups that support operational and strategic logistics. This structure allows us to maintain a comprehensive understanding of the current operational environment and to better prepare for the future environment. The Deputy Director for Operational Logistics focuses and aligns with the core logistics capabilities of supply, maintenance operations, deployment and distribution, health services support, engineering, logistics services, and operational contract support. The Deputy Director for Strategic Logistics focuses on long-term strategy, nowledge-based logistics, multi-national partnerships, capabilities, analysis, and resources. While the operating environment constantly changes, the outcome the joint force commander expects will not. The Joint Force Commander expects joint logistics to give him sustained logistic readiness which will provide freedom of action to effectively execute operations in support of national objectives. ADM Michael Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff 1

Mission Drive Joint Force readiness, maximize the Joint Force Commander s freedom of action, and provide the best logistics advice to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in order to shape the logistics environment Vision Goals Dynamic Logistics Nothing Constrained - - Everything Possible Provide joint logistics strategic direction Deliver integrated joint logistics capabilities Develop the organization and our people Mission Our mission focuses on our three priorities: joint readiness, freedom of action for the Joint Force Commander (JFC), and advice to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Aligning with our mission allows us to prioritize our daily efforts toward achieving our goals and objectives, as presented in this strategic plan. Vision The arrow and punctuation within our vision are deliberate. The arrow represents J-4 s efforts to facilitate adaptive, flexible, and responsive logistics into unconstrained options for the JFC. With unconstrained options, the JFC has freedom of action to mae decisions based on optimal circumstances. Dynamic logistics will overcome the challenges of the Joint Logistics Environment. Goals To achieve our vision, J-4 leadership identified three strategic goals. The first two goals focus on setting strategic direction and integrating logistics capabilities through our interaction with the logistics COI. The third goal focuses on the internal development of the J-4 organization and staff. The objectives supporting each goal form the foundation for turning our strategy into action; they outline how we will mae dynamic logistics happen. No operation should ever be constrained by logistics. Gen James Mattis, Commander, U.S. Joint Forces Command Ad Integr 2

Joint Logistics Environment Today s logistics operations exist within an extremely diverse, complex, and globally distributed environment. Operations are increasingly dependent on the use of a joint force and multinational and interagency relationships. Therefore, we rely more upon the ability of joint logisticians to integrate a wide range of logistics capabilities. Joint logistics requires planners and executers to match the optimal service capabilities to the Joint Tas Force mission requirements. This may require mixing service units or sharing resources to achieve the desired effect. The next quarter century will challenge U.S. joint forces with threats of combat, security, engagement, relief, and reconstruction activities. In addition, our enemy s capabilities will range from improvised to hightech weaponry. No one organization will be successful meeting these challenges alone. Success in the future joint logistics environment will come from aligning the efforts of DOD organizations, the industrial base, non-governmental agencies, and our interagency and multinational partners into a singularly focused Joint Logistics Enterprise. Our strategic plan, in conjunction with the Joint Logistics COMPASS and Joint Logistics White Paper, will play a ey role in the transition from a logistics COI into the future Joint Logistics Enterprise. vocate ate Coordinate 3

The Joint Logistics Enterprise (JLE) The Joint Logistics Enterprise will be a multi-tiered matrix of ey, global logistics providers existing at the strategic, operational, and tactical levels of war. The Joint Logistics Enterprise will include the full range of logistics capabilities and processes. More capable than the sum of its parts, the Joint Logistics Enterprise will provide an unassailable strategic advantage when integrated, synchronized, and optimized. Creating the Joint Logistics Enterprise is critical to providing sustained logistics readiness, achieving unity of effort, and giving the Joint Force Commander (JFC) the trust and confidence to plan and execute operations unfettered by logistical constraints. We will have created the Joint Logistics Enterprise when all logistics partners and staeholders are aligned, interoperable, can leverage all support available, and are synchronized such that the support provided is optimized. Department of Defense logistics organizations including J-4, the Services, the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Combatant Commands, the Defense Logistics Agency, the Defense Contract Management Agency, and the Defense Security Cooperation Agency support the logistics needs of the JFC; they integrate and coordinate logistics capabilities, prioritize, and allocate resources, and develop policy and doctrine. PARTNERS DOD LOGISTICS INTERAGENCY PARTNERS NONGOV ORGAN JOINT COMM Other government agencies and organizations, including the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security, collaborate to support the whole of government concept, a force multiplier to the sills and capabilities already existing within the Department of Defense. 4

IZATIONS Independent, private volunteer, and regional organizations involved in operations; they leverage unique sills and capabilities that can provide the joint warfighter increasingly dynamic logistics. ERNMENTAL FORCE ANDER * INDUSTRIAL BASE PARTNERS MULTINATIONAL Governments and militaries of foreign countries collaborate with U.S. forces to expand mutual support and leverage each others' capabilities to respond quicly to contingencies during times of both peace and war. Leveraging the logistics capabilities of our multinational partners increases the combatant commander s freedom of action by providing more options. Located in the U.S. and globally, private-sector and governmentowned entities (including manufacturing and construction firms, research labs, and technology companies) provide the full array of goods and services required by the armed forces of the United States and its allies. * The JFC is a central partner in the Joint Logistics Enterprise. The JFC controls the capabilities, organizations, and processes to deliver, position, and sustain through the last tactical mile to the point of employment. 5

Goal 1: Provide joint logistics strategic direction The essence of joint operations is not only to match each Service to its proper situation so that it contributes most effectively to success, but also to combine Service capabilities such that each enhances the effectiveness and compensates for the vulnerabilities of the others. 2009 Capstone Concept for Joint Operations Providing a sound strategic direction is critical; it allows for initiatives to be assigned, doctrine to be developed, concepts to move forward, and relationships and communications to solidify. Only when the strategic direction is set, communicated, and inculcated can the logistics COI members wor effectively together and create the Joint Logistics Enterprise. As a leader of joint logistics, J-4 provides joint logistics strategic direction to the whole of the logistics COI. We leverage our position as an integrator and advocate, identifying and communicating best practices for the Joint Force Commander. J-4 demonstrates this leadership through its development of the Joint Logistics COMPASS, a strategic logistics roadmap designed for the logistics COI and future Joint Logistics Enterprise partners and staeholders. 6

Objectives Transition the logistics COI into the Joint Logistics Enterprise Develop a roadmap to transition from today s logistics COI to the future Joint Logistics Enterprise Facilitate ownership, development, and integration of the Joint Logistics COMPASS Migrate the focus of the COMPASS from being objectives-driven to being the fabric of the logistics COI s actions Influence joint logistics through strategy, policy, and doctrine Develop logistics strategy and guidance to influence joint logistics doctrine and improve coordination, as well as promote common understanding between logisticians Advance joint logistics concept development Develop future logistics capabilities with a common joint and interagency operating language Strengthen strategic relationships Improve strategic relationships throughout the logistics COI to leverage core competencies and eliminate redundancies where appropriate Strengthen strategic communications Develop, communicate, and advance an integrated strategic logistics message to build unity of effort within the J-4 and across the logistics COI 7

Goal 2: Deliver integrated joint logistics capabilities The essence of flexibility is in the mind of the commander, the substance of flexibility is in logistics. RADM Henry E. Eccles, United States Navy The current and future operating environment presents J-4, and all joint logisticians, with the most complex set of challenges faced by any force. J-4 must lead the logistics COI to develop new tools and processes to improve decision-maing, planning, and execution for the Joint Force Commander, to provide maximum freedom of action. As modern warfare becomes less conventional, we must prepare our forces to operate in layers of operational environments. We must build the capacity, alliances, and processes to guarantee the success of the future Joint Logistics Enterprise. 8

Objectives Enable effective execution of plans and operations Support the logistics needs of current operations and effectively meet the needs of the joint warfighter Enable effective logistics planning and decision-maing Support the development of logistics tools and processes for the Joint Force Commander Advocate and integrate for solutions to meet the needs of the Combatant Commanders and Services Provide cross-cutting input to synchronize projects and mitigate the gaps faced by the joint warfighter Optimize materiel availability and joint force readiness Align efforts to manage the deployment and redeployment of forces responsibly Shape multinational and interagency logistics Increase interaction with our multinational and interagency partners to build more defense and civilian capacity and capability 9

Goal 3: Develop the organization and our people If you are going to achieve excellence in big things, you develop the habit in little matters. Excellence is not an exception, it is a prevailing attitude. GEN Colin Powell (Ret.), Former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Our fast-paced and changing environment demands a highly trained and well-rounded J-4 staff to facilitate dynamic logistics within the logistics COI. We will be adaptive, flexible, and responsive. We must anticipate tomorrow s logistics challenges and embrace new ideas to enhance future operations. Our success requires the ability to develop the right mix of experience and sills in our people, and to manage nowledge transfer as individuals rotate in and out of the organization. Through improved nowledge management, staff development, and organizational structure, we will minimize gaps and build continuity throughout the organization. Successful execution of this goal enables J-4 to set the strategic direction for joint logistics and deliver integrated joint logistics capabilities. 10

Objectives Develop the organization Institutionalize effective tools, processes, and communication Develop our people through a mix of experience, education, and training Provide opportunities for Department of Defense civilians and military members to access the training required to best execute their responsibilities and further their professional development through various job opportunities in order to learn and grow in technical expertise and leadership roles Align resources to support J-4 goals and objectives Ensure the availability and right allocation of resources to include proper planning, budgeting, and resource management, as well as fostering leadership to promote fiscal management. Organize J-4 internally to align with the execution of our strategic plan 11

Moving Ahead In Review This strategic plan serves as the J-4 guide to accomplish our mission and realize our vision. The strategic goals focus our role as the advocate and integrator within the joint logistics environment to translate dynamic logistics into unconstrained options for the Joint Force Commander. This strategic plan helps us bridge the capability gaps and remove the barriers laid out in the Joint Logistics COMPASS and the Joint Logistics White Paper. It prepares us to meet the challenges of the current and future joint logistics environment. Process We developed this strategic plan using a collaborative planning process with input from internal and external staeholders. Each year, J-4 publishes an annual guidance that identifies the initiatives to be completed during a 12 month period. The J-4 Deputy Directors for Strategic and Operational Logistics, along with the Chief of Staff, are responsible for monitoring and communicating the performance towards achieving our goals and objectives. J-4/JLE Strategic Timeline 1-2 Years 3-5 Years 5-8 Years 8-20 Years J-4 Annual Guidance J-4 Strategic Plan Joint Logistics COMPASS Joint Logistics White Paper Joint Logistics Annual Guidance 2010 Joint Logistics White Paper Mae It Happen At J-4, we have the critical responsibility of supporting the world s preeminent military force. Our strategic plan demonstrates our commitment to supporting the logistics requirements of the current and future environments. We prepare today to support tomorrow s warfighter; the future warfighter depends on us. Let s mae it happen. 12

My unwavering objective is meeting the joint warfighter s needs. LTG Kathleen M. Gainey, Director for Logistics, J-4 13