Urban Hydrology Characteristics and their Influence on Urban Stream Restoration Technology. Presented by:

Similar documents
3.3 Acceptable Downstream Conditions

Impact of Increased Stormwater Runoff on Urban Drainage Systems

TWENTY PLUS YEARS SINCE THE RURAL ONTARIO DATA BASE AND RELATIONSHIPS PUBLICATIONS WERE PRODUCED. LOOKING BACK TO LOOK FORWARD

The Beckett s Run Experience. Fort Wayne, Indiana

Stormwater Erosion Control & Post-Construction Plans (Stormwater Quality Plans)

Hydrotechnical Design Guidelines for Stream Crossings

Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. Chapter 3. Stormwater Management Principles and Recommended Control Guidelines

Stream Restoration in the Urban Environment Concepts and Considerations

APPENDIX E APPENDIX E ESTIMATING RUNOFF FOR SMALL WATERSHEDS

Old Mill School Stream Restoration

APPENDIX E ESTIMATING RUNOFF FROM SMALL WATERSHEDS

Appendix B Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Requirements Checklist

Pre-Treatment Bioretention Cells Bioswales IOWA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL DECEMBER 16, 2015

jmt.com WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT Part of a diversified family of solutions

Prepared for: City of Jeffersonville. November Prepared by

A Hydrologic Study of the. Ryerson Creek Watershed

Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU) Stormwater Plan Review Checklist

Design, Construction, & Benefits of Integrated Stream & Wetland Stormwater Restoration Projects Presented By: Underwood & Associates / Biohabitats,

SECTION IV WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Hydromodification Management Measures

Hydromodification Management Measures

New Castle County, DE. Floodplain Regulations

Municipal Stormwater Management Planning

Jason R. Vogel, Ph.D., P.E. Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering Oklahoma State University

Stream Restoration Raccoon Creek A Case Study

ILLINOIS URBAN MANUAL PRACTICE STANDARD TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING (no.) CODE 975. Source: Hey and Associates, Inc.

TOWN LINE BROOK URBAN WATERSHED STUDY MODELING INCREMENTAL IMPROVEMENTS

LAKE COUNTY HYDROLOGY DESIGN STANDARDS

Incorporating Restoration Planning and Transportation Controls into the Valley Creek Watershed Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan

Wetlands. DuPage County Stormwater Ordinance Update- Wetlands and Buffers. Is a Stormwater Permit Required? 7/13/2012

COTTONWOOD CREEK RECLAMATION PHASE I & II

SECTION III: WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Items in this checklist identify the base requirements that are to be provided by the design professional.

River Restoration, 2018 Has stormwater management been our Achilles Heel in River Management?

Pre/Post Assessment Rubric for Unit: Urban Storm Hydrograph Modeling with the Rational Method for the Urban Desert Southwest USA

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION. Stream processes are strongly related to the physical conditions of the

I. Welcome & Introductions WPAC History (Paul Racette, PEC)

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW Mississippi Dr Coon Rapids, MN SQ FT Residence on 0.64 Acre Lot

Preliminary Drainage Study: Town of Hillsboro Pedestrian & Traffic Safety Project Traffic Calming Project UPC# 70587

Southeast Policy Area Drainage Study

Engineering Report Preliminary Floodplain Study. Executive Summary

Chapter Three: Discussion and Conclusion. 3.1 Introduction/Overview. 3.2 Countywide Stream Assessment

12 DRAINAGE General Administrative Requirements Standards

River Processes River action (fluvial)

Municipal Stormwater Management Plan Prepared For The Borough of Cape May Point By Van Note-Harvey Associates VNH File No.

Detention Pond Design Considering Varying Design Storms. Receiving Water Effects of Water Pollutant Discharges

SEWRPC Staff Memorandum

Santa Margarita Region of Riverside County

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW

Georgia s Unified Stormwater Sizing Criteria The Old, the New, and the Misunderstood

Drainage Criteria Manual Review

Learning objectives. Upon successful completion of this lecture, the participants will be able to describe:

Division of Watershed Stewardship Drainage Program

Krista Reininga, PE Hydromodification and What it Means for the Design of Stormwater Facilities

Table D1: WC-R1 to WC-R3 (Wilket Creek Park)

Stormwater Local Design Manual For Houston County, Georgia

APPENDIX H Guidance for Preparing/Reviewing CEQA Initial Studies and Environmental Impact Reports

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Introduction to stream assessment

DEVELOPMENT OF A HYDRO-GEOMORPHIC MODEL FOR THE LAGUNA CREEK WATERSHED

Wood-Pawcatuck Watershed Flood Resiliency Management Plan

Uncertainty in Hydrologic Modelling for PMF Estimation

Natural Channel Design and Dead River Case Study Stream Restoration in the Great Lakes Basin: Using In-stream Structures & Natural Channel Design

4. Present Activities and Roles

Pajaro River Watershed Flood Prevention Authority. Phase 3 and 4a. Pajaro River Watershed Study

Surface Water. Solutions for a better world

Functional Uplift Based Stream Assessment & Restoration Design

SECTION 7.0 PROJECT FEASIBILITY, ENGINEER S RECOMMENDATION AND DESIGN ISSUES NEEDING RESOLUTION

Section 1 - Introduction

Step-Pool Creation to Restore Fish Passage and Riparian Health

Alternatives for Willow Creek Flood Mitigation Study

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW th Ave NE Ham Lake, MN 55304

STORMWATER RUNOFF AND WATER QUALITY IMPACT REVIEW

EcoStream Getting Our Feet Wet at Every Stage: Optimizing the Restoration of Urban Streams August 16, 2018

Climate and Land Use Consequences to 100-Year Flooding

BMP Design Aids. w w w. t r a n s p o r t a t i o n. o h i o. g o v. Equations / Programs

Adjusted Flood Prone Acres

Public Information Centre # 2 Flood Mitigation Opportunities Study Fourteen Mile Creek & M c Craney Creek Systems Town of Oakville

Water Resources Management Plan

HYDROLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS. 22 nd Annual Nonpoint Source Pollution Conference Saratoga Springs, NY

Design of Stormwater Wetlands

APPENDIX F RATIONAL METHOD

Stormwater: Too Simple?

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW. Spring Lake Park Schools Westwood Middle School st Avenue NE, Spring Lake Park, MN 55432

SCRCA SECTION 28 WETLAND POLICY

Quittapahilla Creek Watershed Implementation Plan

Community Resilience and Mitigation Assessment

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL ON HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 3 POLICY AND PROCEDURES

Implementing Stormwater Management through Split-Flow Drainage Design

BMP 5.4.2: Protect /Conserve/Enhance Riparian Areas

E. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

2. Potential Extreme Peak Discharge in Texas

Site Selection and Design for Stream Mitigation

Will County Site Development Permit Submittal Checklist TAB 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW

ADDENDUM #1 RFP WOLFTRAP CREEK STREAM RESTORATION

October 2015 Utilizing a County-Owned Golf Course for Watershed Restoration in Gwinnett County, GA

Phase II: Proposed (regulated) Impervious in disturbed area (ac) Long Lake Existing Impervious in disturbed area (ac)

Stream Mitigation Considerations. CESAS-RD / 25Sep2014

SHORELINE INVENTORY AND RESTORATION PLANNING

Freight Street Development Strategy

Transcription:

Urban Hydrology Characteristics and their Influence on Urban Stream Restoration Technology Presented by: Michael Clar Ecosite, Inc. James Gracie Brightwater, Inc.

BACKGROUND Many streams in urban areas have been significantly impaired and are often perceived as candidate sites for urban stream restoration Much of the technology used for stream restoration is based on hydrologic regime conditions for rural watersheds For the most part this technology has not been adapted or verified for use in urban watersheds

BACKGROUND Urban land use practices, especially the creation of impervious surfaces, can result in significant alterations to the hydrologic regime of urban watersheds These hydrologic regime alterations can exert significant influence on a number of fundamental concepts currently in use in natural channel restoration technology, including: Bankfull discharge Regional curves of bankfull discharge and channel geometry Rosgen and Schumm stream classification systems Use of reference stream characteristics

LANE S STABLE CHANNEL BALANCE SCR Page 1-14

Land Development, Sediment & Discharge Urban watersheds can have a dramatic impact on both the sediment loads and stream discharge These impacts are not being addressed in current instruction programs for urban stream restoration Failure to consider these impacts can lead to incorrect assumptions and ill-conceived restoration designs

Land Development, Sediment & Discharge (Cont d) Site clearing and mass grading operations can generate high sediment loads While many jurisdictions require sediment control practices during construction, the effectiveness of these programs is inconsistent and estimated to be in the range of 50 to 60% removal of sediment. The accelerated sediment discharge is only temporary for a given site, but the development of an entire watershed can subject a stream to these loads again and again over long periods of time. The classic example of death by a thousand blows

Land Development, Sediment & Discharge (Cont d) The construction process can also generate large increases in surface runoff from exposed and compacted soils Most sediment control devices do not provide for stormwater management Once a watershed has been urbanized the sediment supply from the watershed can be dramatically reduced and lead to discharge of of sediment free or hungry waters Restoration of streams in this state is problematic due to tendency of these streams to continue removing sediment from their channels

Post Construction Land Use and Urban Runoff The land development process can greatly alter the hydrologic regime of developed watersheds The regime alterations include: Runoff volume Peak discharge Discharge frequency and duration Base flow conditions These hydrologic modifications are superimposed on construction impacts and can accelerate channel adjustment processes that are poorly understood and often not addressed in urban stream restoration

Effect of Urbanization on Mean Annual Flood

Effect of Urbanization on Increasing Frequency of Overbank Flows

Use of BMPs to Mitigate Urban Runoff Impacts Many urban watersheds were developed before the advent of SWM programs Growing recognition that many of the SWM programs used to date, particularly peak discharge control of the 2- and 10- year storm events have not been effective in addressing stream channel degradation Primary reason for failure of the peak discharge approach is the failure to effectively address the increase in the volume of runoff

Urban Hydrology and Bankfull Discharge Natural channel design is closely tied to the concept of bankfull discharge The bankfull, dominant or effective discharge is the primary design storm for stream restoration Bankfull discharge is frequently associated with a recurrence interval of 1.5 years as determined using a flood frequency analysis

The Bankfull Discharge Concept

Urban Hydrology and Bankfull Discharge (Cont d) Generally assumed that urban runoff results in a decrease in the return period of the bankfull event such that return periods approaching 1 year could occur. Also generally accepted that the peak discharge value of the bankfull discharge will increase. However, to date, very little documentation has been provided to support these assumptions

Urban Hydrology and Bankfull Discharge (Contd) Detailed procedures for field identification of bankfull discharge conditions have been provided and hands on training for this activity is available While these procedures are generally reliable for rural watersheds, they are at best difficult to apply and interpret on urban streams

Regional Relationships Regional bankfull relationships can be used in natural channel design to obtain a first approximation of field bankfull conditions. These relationships are developed for rural watersheds with 10% or less impervious cover Have limited application to urban watersheds Some attempts are being made to develop regional curves for urban watersheds Applications limited due to variances in TIA and DCIA, and lack of gauging stations for small urban watersheds

Regional Bankfull Discharge Relationships

Regional Hydraulic Geometry Relationships (Leopold, 1994)

Urban Regional Discharge Relationships 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 y=(2.32)+(0.71)*x Urban R 2 =0.963 bf (cfs) Log Q 2.0 1.5 1.0 y=(1.77)+(0.84)*x Rural R 2 =0.995 0.5-1.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Log DA (sq mi)

Urban Hydrology and Stream Classification Concepts Rosgen (19960 and Schumm (1984) have both presented channel evolution concepts that describe the various stages of channel adjustment These concepts were developed for rural watersheds They project that a channel will enlarge and downcut or widen to increase its channel capacity in response to an increase in sediment load or discharge They project that a disturbed channel will abandon its former floodplain and evolve back to a channel geometry with a new floodplain at a lower elevation that approximates the pre-disturbance channel geometry

Schumm Channel Evolution Model

Urban Hydrology and Stream Classification Concepts (Cont d) These channel evolution concepts appear questionable for urban areas that have experienced a substantial and permanent hydrologic regime alteration While abandonment of the floodplain and channel enlargement is typical, it appears questionable that the channel will return to a channel geometry that approximates the pre-development condition There is little, if any, documentation that this process actually takes place in urban watersheds A more likely scenario is that the stream will remain an F stream type. This stream type is characterized by a wide crosssection, shallow depth and fully entrenched condition

Urban Hydrology and Use of Reference Stream Conditions Natural channel design calls for use of a reference reach to establish design parameters based upon a stable stream of the same stream type in the same valley type and physiographic region. The question of whether natural channel parameters from a stable reference reach are appropriate to use for design on a restored channel in a highly urbanized watershed has not been answered satisfactorily Also, geomorphic valley types may not be applicable in urbanized watersheds due to the presence of upstream and downstream culverts and bridges which limit natural adjustment

Summary This presentation has provided a discussion of the characteristics of urban stream hydrology as they relate to the following geomorphic concepts: Sediment load and stream discharge Use of BMPs to mitigate urban runoff impacts The bankfull discharge concept Use of regional discharge and channel geometry relationships Use of stream classification concepts Use of reference stream conditions Many of these concepts were developed for rural watershed conditions and have yet to be modified and validated for use in urban streams

Conclusions There are a number of issues to be resolved in the application of the natural channel approach to stream restoration design: The concept of bankfull discharge may not have the same significance in urbanized watersheds At best it is difficult to determine when the discharge and the channel have reached a regime condition in which the discharge defines the channel It is also difficult to find stable reference reaches in urbanized watersheds and questionable to use reference reaches from rural watersheds The application of reference reach geometry and geomorphic concepts developed for rural watersheds needs to be validated with long term monitoring results The issue of clear or hungry water has not been satisfactorily addressed in urban environments