FHWA FREIGHT PERFORMANCE MEASURES WORKSHOP. May 2012

Similar documents
Caitlin Hughes Rayman Director, FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations May 2013

MAP 21 Freight Provisions and Seaports

MAP-21 themes. Strengthens America s highway and public transportation systems. Creates jobs and supports economic growth

Crystal Jones. Office of Freight Management and Operations. USDOT Federal Highway Administration

Funding Sources for Today:

TRB Panel on the Future of the Interstate

MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress Title in the 21 st Century Subtitle

Overview of the Draft Highway Primary Freight Network. November 20, :00 2:30 pm ET Coral Torres Ed Strocko

FHWA Programs Supporting Freight

Coalition for America s Gateways and Trade Corridors

Association Stakeholders Call for National Freight Program and Stronger Federal Role

Mobility and System Reliability Goal

Freight and Rail Stakeholder Webinar. January 7, 2014

Moving the FHWA Toward Title a Performance Based Transportation Subtitle. FLH Business Meeting Office of Transportation Performance Management

MAP 21 Interim Guidance. State Freight Advisory Committee & State Freight Plan

Multimodal Freight Transportation Policy Overview

Freight Handler to the Nation. Freight Planning in the Chicago Metropolitan Area

SCOPM Performance Measures Webinar

Virginia Critical Rural and Urban Freight Corridor Designation WebEx Discussion. September 28, 2017, 10:30 12:00

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

AASHTO Highway Subcommittee on Maintenance PPR: Support the Development of a Pilot Certification Program for Pavement Preservation

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

IDOT s Long Range Vision and Plan: Transforming Transportation for Tomorrow Performance Management background Tracking & Monitoring performance at

IDOT PERFORMANCE BASED PROJECT METRICS. February 2018

Status of Freight Planning in the Alamo Area MPO

New Jersey Pilot Study

Data Driven Results: North Carolina s Strategic Prioritization Process through SPOT On!ine. NCDOT Strategic Prioritization Office April 4, 2016

Freight Provisions in the FAST ACT

MAP 21: Rulemaking and Asset Condition

AASHTO Policy Papers Topic IX: Freight

Telling the Freight (trucking/goods movement) story:

WTP Phase 2 Implementation & Freight System Plan

Performance Measures for Freight Transportation

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century MAP-21

FAST Act House and Senate Freight Provisions

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN 2017

Status of Freight Planning in the Alamo Area MPO

Northeast Clean Freight Corridors Workgroup #5 Designating Alternative Fuel Corridors

9.0 Meeting the Challenges

Title Subtitle. Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium Session 1-D, Asset Management Meeting and Performance Measures I August Date 19, 2015

FREIGHT CORRIDORS AND GATEWAYS: DEVELOPMENT APPROACH AND EVALUATION CRITERIA COMPARISON IN NORTH AMERICA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION

IDENTIFYING INDIANA'S PORTION OF THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION. AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)

Let s Keep Moving 2036: Policy Plan

Freight And Infrastructure. Bruce Lambert Executive Director Institute for Trade and Transportation Studies

Implementation of Transportation Performance Management Title Program Subtitle

Title Performance Subtitle Management: Advancing a National Meeting Transportation System Date

TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Asset Management and Pavement Performance Measures The 30, mile view.

AASHTO Summary and Analysis of the Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy (DRIVE) Act August 28, 2015

Draft for Public Review

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN. Greater Houston Freight Committee Kick-Off Meeting

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Relationship to 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) - Goals and Performance Measures

Transportation Performance Measures Safety Target-Setting

2017 Freight System Plan

A lot can happen in the middle of nowhere

FHWA TPM Framework and Capability Maturity Model (CMM)

MPO Freight Advisory Committees: Philadelphia-Camden Region Case Study

Implementation of MAP-21 Performance TitleProvisions Subtitle

Talking Freight Agenda Session Description: Overview of the MARAD StrongPorts Program

America Association of Port Authorities Maritime Economic Development Seminar New Bedford. Paul H Bea Jr June 5, 2012

Innovations in Freight Planning and Project Prioritization

Performance Measures for Transportation Planning Part 1

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: FACILITATING TEXAS ECONOMIC GROWTH AND GLOBAL COMPETIVENESS

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Regional Freight Plan

USDOT PERFORMANCE BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING (PBPP)

Addendum 1: Performance Measures

FHWA Freight Performance Measures New York Workshop. Freight Performance Measures Program Background

ODOT Asset Management Plan 0

Operations in the 21st Century DOT Meeting Customers Needs and Expectations

Corridor Planning Organizations and Ports I-95 Corridor: A Marine Highway Corridor

MULTIMODAL NETWORK ANALYSIS FOR COAL FREIGHT IN KENTUCKY SESSION 6.2.3

Progress Report on the Implementation of the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS)

MEETING SUMMARY FOR APRIL 13, 2017

Steering Committee Meeting 1 of 5

NC State Freight Plan

Moving Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Bicycle Mobility Master Plan Transit Master Plan

Proposed Comprehensive Update to the State of Rhode Island s Congestion Management Process

Benefit-Cost Analysis in MPO Transportation Planning

Federal-aid 101 A Financial Overview. Mark Newland FHWA, Financial Manager Purdue Road School, 2014

Performance Based Planning and Federal Target Setting. Transportation Policy Board September 13, 2018

Northeast Rail Operations Study (NEROps)

INDIANA S INTERMODAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Stephen C. Smith Planning Manager, Transportation Planning Division Indiana Department of Transportation

TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

2040 Addendum Performance-Based Planning November 2018

The Role of Transportation Systems Management & Operations in Supporting Livability and Sustainability

Ports play a critical role in the national transportation system, providing the access

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: DRAFT KEY POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS

Will County Community Friendly Freight Mobility Plan: Executive Committee Update

MAP-21 Freight Provisions and Data Needs

NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING. 23 CFR Part 490

How HRTPO Helps Freight Move. Presented by Robert B. Case, PE, PhD Transportation Technical Advisory Committee Agenda Item #13 April 1, 2015

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

LOUISIANA FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN Donald Vary. March 1, 2016

American Association of Port Authorities Spring Meeting March 24, 2009

New Approaches to Public Collaboration

Development of the I-70 Corridor of National Significance

Designing the Future of NMDOT

Freight Plans Planning, Preparing Staying Ahead. MAASTO July, 2013

Framework for ADOT Asset Management System. Jean A. Nehme, PhD, PE Arizona Department of Transportation

Transcription:

FHWA FREIGHT PERFORMANCE MEASURES WORKSHOP May 2012

Before we begin Introductions Agenda Additional Information

Performance Measures Overview

The surplus, that which is produced in one place to be consumed in another; the capacity of each locality for producing a greater surplus; the natural means of transportation, and their susceptibility for improvement; the hindrances, delays, and losses of life and property during transportation, and the causes of each, would be among the most valuable statistics in this connection. From those it would readily appear where a given amount of expenditure would do the most good. Speech of Mr. A. Lincoln of Illinois in the House of Representatives, June 28, 1848

Freight Transportation Landscape The increasing orientation toward a performancebased transportation system Government transparency and accountability The emergence of corridor level thinking Discretionary programs (e.g. TIGER)

Recent Performance Management Actions at the National Level FHWA Performance Based Federal Aid Program Transportation Authorization Proposals MAP-21 American Energy and Infrastructure Jobs Act of 2012

Why Use Performance Measures?

Why We Use Performance Measures Decision Making Guide resource allocation decisions Planning Provide link between goals and specific actions Mechanism for understanding system performance Forecasting and Modeling Track system performance over time Performance Management Improves the management and delivery of products and services Evaluate impacts of policies, plans, programs, and projects Performance measurement is mandated for federal agencies by the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) of 1993 and GPRA Modernization Act of 2010 Communicate Results and Strengthen Accountability Demonstrates the accountability of taxpayer resources Helps justify programs and their costs --Given limited budgets, etc., another tool for informing investment decisions at a national, state or local level

Private Sector Experience Evolution of Measures Basic financial Productivity or internal performance Competency or innovation Resource allocation/tradeoff Continuous Improvement (TQM, ISO, Balanced Scorecard) Qualitative and Quantitative General Categories Customer satisfaction Process measurement Freight Specific Categories Productivity (labor/truck) On-time/Reliability Costs

Freight Performance Measures Part I

What are Typical Categories of Freight Performance Measures?

Typical Categories of Freight Performance Measures Freight Demand System Efficiency System Condition Freight Safety Environmental Conditions System Investment

Vote for the Most Important Freight Performance Measures Category Federal State MPO Local

Which Freight Performance Measures to Use?

Freight Performance Measures Group Exercise: Your organization recently developed a regional freight plan Leadership asks you to identify measures (2 for each of the 6 typical categories) that can provide the best metrics and indicators for the freight system You are given two categories to work on: What measures would you choose? How would you set targets?

Terminology Goals Objectives Strategies Actions Performance Measures Program Project Input Output Outcome Targets Policy/Aspiration Trend/Modeled Benchmarks/Baseline

Data Considerations When Appling Freight Performance Measures Understanding your data source Several levels on which freight performance measures could be considered state or system-wide on individual corridors, or on individual routes the correct level to use may depend on the purpose for which policymakers are considering the measure Current state of the practice in performance measurement - many measures currently being used and suggested are based primarily on the available data.

Data Types and Sources Types Administrative Records Survey/Probe Modeled Sources Federal Agencies State Agencies Private Sector

Freight Performance Measurement Data Information and data on freight movement often resides with the private sector Public-Private data sharing partnerships offer an opportunity to gain access to information that accurately reflects geographical freight flows, commodity flows, and freight system performance Benefits to the Private Sector: Increase capacity Improve Operations Work Zones Incidents Bottlenecks Trucking Parking Garner support for freight programs and funding

FPM Freight Data Sharing Success Story: Data Privacy and Protections Required Data is derived from individuals within the trucking industry, therefore: Anonymity is required Appropriate data usage must be ensured Air Quality, enforcement, tolling Legal protections must be in place

Freight/ Other Data Use and Sharing Probe Data and Similar Data is a New Area Current Legal Thinking Suggests Data is Owned by the Source An Individual, Company or Industry is Owner What are the Consequences? Other Freight Modes Non-Freight Data

Break

FHWA Performance Based Federal Aid Program and Recent Legislative Proposals

Surface Transportation Policy National Commission Recommendations Strong Federal role focused on national goals Consolidated program structure Performance management Many groups supporting Commission s recommendations, all embraced a performance-based program (U.S. DOT, AASHTO, AMPO, APTA, GAO, and more) 24

What is Transportation Performance Management? Transportation Performance Management (TPM) is a strategic approach that uses system information to make investment and policy decisions to achieve a desired set of national goals. 25

What is FHWA Doing Now? Awareness Capacity Building Plan Information Access Tools Workshops Benchmark Studies Pilots Case Studies New Measures Framework Elements Guidance Coordinating Efforts 26

The TPM Framework

The TPM Framework

FHWA s Commitment to Performance Management Natural evolution to improve decision making and resource allocation Improves transparency and accountability for federal funds Opportunity to advance performance management practices prior to legislation

Authorization Side-by-Side Comparison Element Senate Version House Version Performance Goals Measures 5 national goal areas: - Safety - Infrastructure Condition - System Reliability - Freight/Economic Vitality - Environmental Sustainability - Measures for 5 national goal areas - USDOT establishes measures - 1 national performance management goal - Nation s highway and public transportation systems - Ensure: - economic growth - safety improvement - increased mobility - Measures for 11 categories (22 max measures) - States recommend measures - USDOT establishes measures.

Authorization Side-by-Side Comparison Element Senate Version House Version Targets - States & MPOs establish targets. - USDOT certifies target. - Accountability to meeting targets - States establish & adjust targets - USDOT sets process Plans Reporting - Investment plans required - Integrated into planning process - USDOT certifies plans - States required to submit performance progress report - USDOT required to produce national performance report - Investment plans required - Integrated into planning process - USDOT sets process - Plans required to use funds - States required to submit performance progress report

Common Authorization Themes National performance areas National performance measures State performance targets Plans to document investment strategies Transparent performance reporting Performance based planning and programming Performance accountability

Differences to be Resolved Specific national performance areas Implementation schedule Approach to accountability requirements Approach to target setting Federal role Plan development Target setting National reporting

Challenges and Opportunities Need for consistent measures Reliability and quality of data Availability and timeliness of data Target setting Agency coordination Linking actions with outcomes

MAP-21 and Freight Performance Management Implications National Freight Program Elements (Sec 1115) National Freight Network Freight Conditions and Performance Report National Freight Strategic Plan Freight Performance Management

National Freight Network Components: (MAP-21 Sec 1115) Primary Freight Network (PFN) Portions of the Interstate System not designated as part of the PFN Critical Rural Freight Corridors (RFC) Designation: PFN designated by the Secretary and composed of up to 27,000 miles of existing roadways critical to freight movement, plus up to 3,000 miles of roadways (existing or planned) critical to future goods movement; RFC designated by States (subject to some constraints). Re-evaluated every 10 years.

Funding Projects on the NFN (MAP-21) Eligible Projects Must demonstrate the improvement made by the project to the efficient movement of freight on the national freight network Up to 10% can be spent on freight rail and maritime projects Eligible Location of Projects On the PNF On a portion of the Interstate System not designated as PFN On roads off of the Interstate System or PFN, if that use of funds will provide a more significant improvement or critical freight access to the PFN or Interstate System On a NHS freight intermodal connector; On critical rural freight corridors (up to 20%) Within the boundaries of public and private intermodal facilities

Freight Transportation Conditions and Performance (C&P) Report (MAP-21) Due every 2 years USDOT prepares a report that describes the conditions and performance of the national freight network in the United States

National Freight Strategic Plan and Policy (MAP-21 Sec 1115 and 33003/33004) Condition and performance Identification of highway bottlenecks Forecasts of freight volumes Identification of major trade gateways and national freight corridors Assessment of barriers to improved freight transportation performance Best practices for improving the performance and mitigating impacts Process for addressing multistate projects and encouraging jurisdictions to collaborate Strategies to intermodal connectivity

American Energy and Infrastructure Jobs Act of 2012 Freight Plans and Policy (HR7) National Freight Policy - USDOT to establish a 5 year National Freight Policy Specify goals, objectives and milestones with respect to the expansion of capacity and improvement of infrastructure Specify programs, strategies, and projects that will assist in achieving goals and objectives State Freight Plans - USDOT to encourage the States to develop freight plans that includes performance measures. An identification of significant freight system trends, needs, and issues A description of the freight policies, strategies, and performance measures that will guide the state s freight-related investment decisions. Evidence of use of innovative technologies Reduce or impede deterioration of routes carry heavy vehicles

AASHTO ON FREIGHT PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT Key measure areas include: Reliability measure in Urban areas and on Significant Freight Corridors (SFC) Speed/Travel-Time measure for Trucks and on SFC Roadway access measure to major roadways and last mile connectors (Urbanized areas and on SFC) Extracted Freight and Economic Development Task Force of Standing Committee on Performance Management http://www.transportation.org/?siteid=97&pageid=2956