John Vile, MS Water Monitoring & Standards Bureau of Freshwater and Biological Monitoring

Similar documents
Biomonitoring in New Jersey: Status, Gaps, and Refinements

Municipal Stormwater Management Planning

Finding Data Gaps: Compiling and Interpreting Existing Data

Biological Uplift in Stream Restoration Projects. September 20, Presentation by: Wetlands and Waterways Program

Appendix D3. Aquatic Resources. Tennessee Valley Authority Reservoir Operations Study Final Programmatic EIS

APPENDIX H Guidance for Preparing/Reviewing CEQA Initial Studies and Environmental Impact Reports

DRAFT Introduction:

Maumee Area of Concern Water Quality Database Development

Carp Creek 2013 Summary Report

Linda Cooper, Eno River State Park, Durham, NC

Susquehanna River Smallmouth Bass Disease Investigation

BIG ROCHE A CRI LAKE CHARACTERISTICS

Raritan River Basin. How to protect quality & quantity of water resources? Land Protection and Management to Protect Water Resources

Climate Change: Impacts, Monitoring, and Solutions

Amanda Deal & Len Lichvar Somerset Conservation District

MURPHY DRAIN CATCHMENT

2016 New Jersey Integrated Water Quality Assessment Methods FINAL

CITY OF GRIFFIN STREAM BANK RESTORATION PROGRAM

Index of Watershed Indicators: An Overview

BUREAU OF CLEAN WATER OUTSIDE AGENCY DATA AND QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

Riffle Beetles to Riparian Buffers

Technical Memorandum. Ipswich and Shawsheen River Watersheds 2005 Fish Population Monitoring and Assessment

KRISTOPHER J. KRZYSTON, CEI, CEM

Portage Lake Hubbard County

Senator Bob Smith 216 Stelton Rd, Suite E-5 Piscataway, NJ April 7, Dear Senator Smith,

CERP System Status Reports The Evolution from

Patrick Center for Environmental Research

3 Objectives 3 Ob jec tives

Biological Water Quality Assessments and Criteria in Korea

Chapter Three: Discussion and Conclusion. 3.1 Introduction/Overview. 3.2 Countywide Stream Assessment

STREAM AND BUFFER AREA PROTECTION/RESTORATION

Lesson 2-2: Riparian Zones

Natural Resources and Climate Resiliency in Germantown

Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District Six Lakes Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan

What Are Environmental (Instream) Flows?

Riparian Buffers and Stream Restoration

WATERSHED. Maitland Valley. Report Card 201

Habitat Grant Projects Clinton River Watershed

Chapter 4 Watershed Goals and Objectives

NJDEP Regulations that impact or soon will impact agricultural operations. April 1, 2007 Horses 2007

A Summary Guide to the. Rifle River WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN. Know Your Watershed Protect Its Resources

Hydrologic and Ecologic Impacts from the CERP Indian River Lagoon South Project

AP Environmental Science

9. Evaluation Mechanisms

AP Environmental Science

Ecological Indicators of Water Resource Pressure. Willie Duncan SEPA Jan 2013

Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Watercraft. Scenic Rivers Program

Fort Clatsop Restoration Project Summary Report

VILLAGE OF BELLAIRE WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN

Watts Creek 2014 Summary Report

FACTSHEET INTRODUCTION. help rebalance the water cycle, mitigate the effects of climate change and improve human health and livelihoods.

RIDEAU RIVER - RIDEAU FALLS CATCHMENT

The status of aquatic ecosystems in the Basin

APPENDIX F. Receiving Water Conditions, Potential Impacts of MS4 Discharges, and Priority Water Quality Conditions in the San Dieguito River WMA

Lake Pepin Watershed TMDL: Looking Ahead. August 2008 Sector Meetings. Lake Pepin Photo by Guy Schmickle

Water Quality Workshop Delaware Bay Region Pilot Study Summary. March 11, 2008

EXISTING AND READILY AVAILABLE DATA

North Dakota s Nutrient Reduction Strategy. Presented to the 2016 ND Water Quality Monitoring Conference March 4, 2016

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: URBAN STREAM RESTORATION BMP. David Wood Chesapeake Stormwater Network. Lisa Fraley-McNeal Center for Watershed Protection

Recent Developments in Water Withdrawal Management

The development of the Big Pond Dip invertebrate survey method

Biodiversity Debate. To evaluate the biological, aesthetic, ethical, social and economic arguments with regard to maintaining biodiversity.

Department of the Army Permit Application

VIDEO: Riparian Forest Buffers: The Link Between Land & Water

Lisa Hauck Stream Restoration May

ECOSYSTEMS, WATERSHEDS AND POLLUTION CONTROL REVIEW

Overview of the Clean Water Act and Water Quality Standards

POLICY FOR NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AREAS

SUSTAINABLE WATER BRIEFING. MWRA Advisory Board

Nutrients and Water Quality in the East Souris River Watershed

Factsheet: Town of Deep River Water Quality and Stormwater Summary

Reporting Period: 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2010. Understanding the Level 2 Stream Monitoring Data Report

Hydrology and Water Quality. Water. Water 9/13/2016. Molecular Water a great solvent. Molecular Water

TORCH LAKE TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN

719 Griswold, Suite 820 Detroit, MI DANVERS POND DAM REMOVAL AND STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT

APPENDIX H MONITORING & ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN

2016 Lake Worth Lagoon CAP 1135 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Study. Preliminary Results

The total population of the township is 9,942 (2015 Five-Year American Community Survey [ACS]). The median household income is over $109,000.

Rewards, Challenges, Approaches and Solutions for Developing the Soos Creek Bioassessment TMDL

Elements of the Storm Water Management Plan. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)

SKIBO PROJECT SCOPING REPORT Laurentian Ranger District, Superior National Forest

SPARTA TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. April 2005

Assessing Natural Resource Impacts from the Enbridge Pipeline Spill into the Kalamazoo River

Lake Tahoe Nearshore Evaluation and Monitoring Framework Report

Wyoming Stream Quantification Tool User Manual (Beta Version)

Modeling Fate and Effects of Multiple Stressors on a Use- Impaired River

Polluted Runoff and Land Conservation: What s the Connection?

Council of Governments

Macroinvertebrates as bioindicators

Using Airborne Imagery, GIS & Remote Sensing for Ecological Monitoring and Mapping

The Grand River. Overview of Water Quality and Ecological Health. Daniel M. O Keefe, Ph.D. Michigan Sea Grant MSU Extension

Highlands Environmental Resource Inventory for the [insert municipality name]tewksbury Township

General Plan Update Workshop 6 Agriculture, Conservation, & Open Space February 23, 2005

Task 1: Framework for a Reexamination. Falls Nutrient Strategy

Restoration and Protection of the Water Resources of the Greenwood Lake Watershed in New Jersey

Living Shorelines & Coastal Resiliency: A Consultants Perspective. Presented by: Bethany Bearmore, P.E. Louis Berger

Healthy Watersheds Assessment. Potomac Watersheds in West Virginia

Transcription:

NJ Fish Index of Biotic Integrity John Vile, MS Water Monitoring & Standards Bureau of Freshwater and Biological Monitoring

Program Objectives Determine the current Status of fish communities, which reflect overall ecological integrity of the water resource. Integrate Fish IBI with existing benthic macroinvertebrate environmental indicator. Establish a routinely monitored network, so that Trends in ecological integrity can be determined.

Program Objectives (cont.) Verify Compliance with primary goals of Clean Water Act Evaluate the Causes of degraded water resources and the relative contribution of pollution sources. Evaluate Effectiveness of restoration programs and control strategies.

WHY Do We Monitor? USEPA National Guidance, Elements of a State Water Monitoring and Assessment Program, adopted March 2003, requires development of long term monitoring strategy To include assessment of all waters of state (rivers, lakes, streams, reservoirs, estuaries, oceans, wetlands & groundwater)

USEPA Strategic Elements Strategy must include discussion of 9 basic elements for each waterbody type Monitoring objectives Monitoring design Core & supplemental water quality indicators Quality assurance Data management Data analysis/assessment Reporting Programmatic evaluation General support and infrastructure planning

Core & Supplemental Water Quality Indicators Biological Indicators Provide measure of biological condition that integrates chemical and physical stressors over larger spatial and temporal scales than direct measurements At least 3 different principal indicators recommended, including benthic macroinvertebrates, fish, and periphytic algae Need three to integrate different levels of integration due to mobility and life history characteristics

What is a Fish Index of Biotic Integrity? Using fish assemblages to assess the overall health of a stream ecosystem A scoring system based on multiple attributes (metrics) of a fish assemblage Individual metrics are summed and overall score used to determine health of a water body Metrics selected based on how well they indicate anthropogenic stressors

Why Use Fish as Biological Monitors? Fish are long-lived and are therefore good indicators of long-term disturbances Fish assemblages generally consist of a number of trophic levels Fish are at the top of the food chain in aquatic environments Fish are easy to collect and identify The NJ Fish IBI is a true Index of Biotic Integrity

Healthy Fish Community Brook Trout Smallmouth Bass Swallowtail Shiner Satinfin Shiner Margined Madtom Cutlips Minnow Slimy Sculpin

Impaired Fish Community Mummichog Banded Killifish Green Sunfish White Sucker Common Carp

Backpack Electrofishing Methods Barge Electrofishing

Northern IBI Program Implemented in 2000 100 Fixed Site Network 20 Sites per Year, 5 Year Rotation Index Period June through Mid-October Round 2 Sampling Initiated in 2005

Metric Recalibration Round 1 sampling completed in 2004 Metrics recalibrated in 2005 by BFBM using Round 1 data Analysis and modifications reviewed by Fish IBI Workgroup (USEPA, USGS, NJDEP-BFF, NJDEP-BWQS&A) Final metric revisions greatly increased sensitivity to anthropogenic stressors 50 Round 1 Ratings (Original Metric Scoring) 50 Round 2 Scoring (Revised Metric Scoring) 40 40 Percent 30 20 Percent 30 20 10 10 0 Excellent Good Fair Poor 0 Excellent Good Fair Poor

Integrated Report 2006 Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report http://www.state.nj.us/dep/wms/bwqsa/integratedlist2006report.html Fish IBI data is used, in concert with available benthic macroinvertebrate data, to help the Department measure aquatic life designated use attainment, as elaborated in the 2006 New Jersey Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report

Integrated Report 2006 Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Methods document http://www.state.nj.us/dep/wms/bwqsa/docs/2006appendixgintegrated WQMAMethodology.pdf Sites with an FIBI rating of "poor" are considered to be impacted significantly enough that, for purposes of the Department's Water Quality Monitoring and Integrated Assessment Report ( 40 CFR 130.7 and N.J.A.C. 7:15-6f), they will be categorized as "impaired"

Waters Needing Special Attention C1 Anti-degradation Category 1 waters: antidegradation designation - no measurable or predictable water quality change One basis - Exceptional Ecological Significance Monitoring data used - macroinvertebrates, fish IBI, aquatic-dependent T&E species, habitat, physical / chemical, & impervious cover

Fish IBI enables quick assessment No laboratory analysis Useful tool for pinpointing stressed areas Other Studies Stressor Identification Provides supplemental information In 2006, 2 sites were sampled (Beaver Brook and Drakes Brook) Numerous sites on Drakes Brook were evaluated

Case Studies Whippany River FIBI009 FW2-NTC2 Sampled in 2000 & 2005 FIBI Score Poor (26) Habitat Score Sub-optimal Numerous habitat impairments No riparian buffer Numerous outfalls Urbanization (48%) 14% impervious cover Run-off from roads & parking lots High conductivity Numerous abnormalities No insectivorous cyprinids

Green Brook FIBI097a FW2-NTC2 Sampled in 2005 FIBI Score Poor (22) Habitat Score Marginal Case Studies 2004 2005 1999 No riparian buffer Severe bank erosion Heavy siltation Urbanization (65%) 22% impervious cover Run-off from township park High conductivity/low D.O. Low benthic insectivore abundance

Case Studies Ireland Brook FIBI051 FW2-NTC2 Sampled in 2003 & 2007 R2 FIBI Score Poor (26) R2 Habitat Score Optimal No obvious habitat or water quality impairments Good riparian buffer/bank vegetation Headwaters mainly urbanized (55%) 19% impervious cover Severe storm water run-off in headwaters

Case Studies Spruce Run FIBI036 FW2-TPC1 Sampled in 2001 & 2006 R2 FIBI Score Fair (34) R2 Habitat Score Sub-optimal Bridge construction just upstream Impairments to benthic community Insectivorous cyprinids decreased from 66% in 2001 to 16% in 2006 Flash flooding <4% impervious cover Limited riparian buffer Newly formed sediment bars

Southern IBI Lower Delaware River Drainage Developed by NJ Fish & Wildlife Piloted by BFBM in 2007 Index Period June through Mid-October

Any Questions?