GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT

Similar documents
April 7, Webster Street Sub-Surface Stormwater Storage System Bid No Bid Date: 4/13/17 ADDENDUM NO 1

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Subsurface Investigation Report. Proposed New 1-Story Building 6447 Grand Avenue Gurnee, Illinois

Applied GeoScience, Inc Hammond Dr., Suite 6 Schaumburg, Illinois

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Applied GeoScience, Inc Hammond Dr., Suite 6 Schaumburg, Illinois

SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION & GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION I-15 SIGN BRIDGES LAS VEGAS EA JANUARY

Geotechnical Engineering Report

REPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION

CHAPTER 7 PAVEMENT DESIGN. 1. Gradation (sieve and hydrometer analysis) 3. Moisture density relationships and curves

Please include this addendum in your Bid proposal for the above referenced project. Questions are in black ink, and the answers are in red ink.

Typical Subsurface Profile. November 28, 2016

Geotechnical Testing Laboratory, Inc. Engineering and Construction Materials Testing Services

REPORT OF SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES

Washtenaw Community College Design & Construction Facilities Management 4800 East Huron River Drive Ann Arbor, MI

August 15, 2006 (Revised) July 3, 2006 Project No A

Subsurface Investigation Report

Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration Armstrong Tract Rivers Avenue and Hanahan Road North Charleston, South Carolina S&ME Project No.

REPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES

REPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ANALYSIS

Subsurface Environmental Investigation

GENERAL SOILS EVALUATION REPORT. For

A. Texas Department Transportation 2004 Standard Specifications for Construction of Highways, Streets and Bridges (TxDOT):

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT B-1942

SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION, LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM, AND PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS

geotechnical and construction materials consultants

GEOTECHNICAL STUDY HIDDEN VALLEY SPORTS PARK RESTROOM FACILITY MABEL JONES DRIVE CANYON LAKE, TEXAS

GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION REPORT. For the. Project ID: th Avenue Vogt Drive to Decorah Road Local Street Washington County.

SECTION TRENCHING & BACKFILLING

ECS PROJECT NO. 04:9974. For. Community Housing Partners c/o Mr. Lee S. Alford 4915 Radford Avenue, Suite 300 Richmond, Virginia 23230

This report presents the findings of the subsurface exploration concerning the design of the taxiway rehabilitation. Description

File No Supplemental November Geotechnical and Environmental Consulting Engineers

SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION, LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM, AND FOUNDATION AND PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS

Geotechnical Investigation Report

GEOTEK ENGINEERING & TESTING SERVICES, INC. 909 East 50 th Street North Sioux Falls, South Dakota Phone Fax

November 13, IP3406. Mr. Uriah Sowell Rooney Engineering 115 Inverness Drive East, Suite 300, Englewood, CO 80112

REPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS DMA TAMPA RED BRICK BUILDING TAMPA, FLORIDA FOR MRI ARCHITECTURAL GROUP, INC.

November 13, IP3406. Mr. Uriah Sowell Rooney Engineering 115 Inverness Drive East, Suite 300, Englewood, CO 80112

BASE CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS A Aggregate

CCR Rule Siting Criteria Unstable Areas

CHAPTER 3 CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING OF SUBGRADE

Rock Creek Apartments Wheatland, WY

Thank you for choosing Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) as your geotechnical consultant for the proposed project.

GENERAL SOILS EVALUATION REPORT. For

In preparation for constructing buildings on a property, the builder. Site Preparation CHAPTER

Consultant Specifications for Subsurface Investigation & Geotechnical Analysis and Design Recommendations

PROJECT NO A. ISSUED: February 29, 2016

Report of Geotechnical Engineering Investigation OIA SOUTH CELL LOT (W340) AID Project No. GOA16001 Orange County, Florida GEC Project No.

Stormwater Standards. Clackamas County Service District No. 1. Infiltration Testing Guide

REPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ANALYSIS BRUNSWICK FARM APARTMENTS MANOR TWP., LANCASTER CO.

DIVISION 31 EARTHWORK 2006 Edition, Published January 1, 2006; Division Revision Date: January 31, 2012

Amendment 03 Soils Report. At Air Academy High School 6910 Carlton Drive Colorado Springs, CO 80840

Addendum 1 - Appendix A - 1 of 22

SELECTIVE FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION BASED ON FORENSIC INVESTIGATION AND DEFLECTION ANALYSIS: SEVENTEEN YEARS CASE STUDY IN VIRGINIA

REPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION. Panama City, Bay County, Florida

SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised 5/8/7)

B. Backfill and compact utility bedding and fill placed in the utility trenches between the top of the utility bedding and the subgrade elevation.

B. Subsurface data is available from the Owner. Contractor is urged to carefully analyze the site conditions.

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY. For

SOIL MECHANICS Assignment #2: Soil Classification Solution.

Subsurface Exploration and Foundation Analysis Proposed New Weight Room / Fieldhouse Building 429 N Highway 83 Leakey, Texas

TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL

SOIL CLASSIFICATION BASICS Commonly based on grain size and soil consistency. Several classification systems exist:

GEOTECHNICAL STUDY. Proposed East Point Fire Station No Ben Hill Road Drive East Point, Georgia

BLEINC. August 17, Black & Veatch Corporation 201 Brookfield Parkway, Suite 150 Greenville, SC 29607

You also requested information regarding a sieve analysis at each boring locations. The test results are attached.

REPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION For PROPOSED OUTDOOR THEATER 495 Upper Park Road APN Santa Cruz, California

SECTION AGGREGATES

Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Household Hazardous Waste Facility Astoria, Oregon

APPENDIX D STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND SIZING CALCULATIONS

The following sections provide the approved standard infiltration testing specifications.

1. ADD the attached test hole reports for Well Nos. 19 & 20 to the specifications.

C. Foundation stabilization for pipe and utility structures.

Section 25 Aggregate Subbase

SECTION RIPRAP, BOULDERS, AND BEDDING

SECTION Section Excavation and Backfill For Structures Section Embedment and Base Course Aggregate

R-TANK SPECIFICATIONS

REPORT ON. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 6945 McKEOWN DRIVE OSGOODE WARD, GREELY CITY OF OTTAWA, ONTARIO

REPORT. Explorations and Geotechnical Engineering Services. Proposed Seaport Village Healthcare Facility Ellsworth, Maine. March 27, S

Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation

PART IV WASHINGTON SUBURBAN SANITARY COMMISSION PROCUREMENT OFFICE SCOPE / STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW) / TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS BT/BR6146A16

Subsurface Investigations PDCA Professor s Driven Pile Institute. Loren R. Anderson Utah State University June 25, 2015

SPECIFICATION FOR ENGINEERED FILLS

2. Pavement Materials: Consist of flexible or rigid pavements, typically HMA or PCC, respectively, or a composite of the two.

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Background of Existing Facility 3. Proposed Work 4

REPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ANALYSIS COASTAL COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION NEAR I-45 AND FM 1764 LA MARQUE, TEXAS FOR

Geotechnical Assessment Clackamette Cove Development Oregon City, Oregon

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT Revision 1 May 3, 2017

BUILDING ADDITION Hurlburt Field AFB, Okaloosa County, Florida

Determination of Design Infiltration Rates for the Sizing of Infiltration based Green Infrastructure Facilities

A. Texas Department of Transportation 2004 Standard Specifications for Construction and Maintenance of Highways, Streets and Bridges (TxDOT).

SITE INVESTIGATION. Foundation Engineering

GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION BLUE LINE LRT STATION IMPROVEMENTS SAN DIEGO, NATIONAL CITY, AND CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA

Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Study DCPL Capitol View Branch Library Washington, D.C. HCEA Job No A. Prepared for:

Report of Geotechnical Engineering Services Proposed Boat Ramp Black River The Chehalis Reservation, Washington

DGeo. Cap Sante Boat Haven M, N, O-Dock Maintenance Dredge Project Anacortes, Washington. June 7, for Port of Anacortes

ITEM 275 PORTLAND CEMENT TREATED MATERIALS (ROAD MIXED)

Geotechnical Engineering Subsurface Investigation Report 15-SI-9-OI-1Page) 1637 Bank Street, Ottawa, ON. Yuri Mendez M. Eng, P. Eng.

Transcription:

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT PROJECT MINECRAFT ACCESS ROAD BOYDTON PLANK ROAD DINWIDDIE COUNTY, VIRGINIA JOB NUMBER: 37775.003 PREPARED FOR: DINWIDDIE COUNTY PO BOX 70 DINWIDDIE COUNTY, STATE 23841 FEBRUARY 20, 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... A 1. PROJECT INFORMATION... 1 2. FIELD EXPLORATION... 1 3. LABORATORY TESTING... 2 4. SITE GEOLOGY... 3 5. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS... 4 5.1 Ground Surface Cover... 4 5.2 Existing Fill Soils... 4 5.3 Coastal Plain... 4 5.4 Groundwater... 4 6. EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION THICKNESSES... 4 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS... 5 7.1 Site Preparation... 5 7.1.1 General... 5 7.1.2 Subgrade Evaluation... 6 7.1.3 Undercut Potential... 6 7.2 Excavations... 6 7.4 Pavement Support... 8 8. LIMITATIONS OF REPORT... 9 9. CLOSURE... 9 APPENDICES Appendix A Figures Appendix B Boring Logs Appendix C Laboratory Test Results Appendix D Asphalt Core Photos Appendix E Pavement Calculations

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY For your convenience, this report is summarized in outline form below. This brief summary should not be used for design or construction purposes without reviewing the more detailed conclusions and recommendations contained in this report. 1. The subsurface exploration included a visual site reconnaissance, performance of six hand auger borings to a depth of approximately five feet below the ground surface, three asphalt cores and quantitative laboratory testing. 2. The borings encountered approximately 3 to 6 inches of surficial topsoil (forest litter). Existing fill was encountered in boring HA-02 to a depth of approximately one foot below the ground surface. The fill consisted of loose silty sand (SM). Beneath the topsoil and fill in HA-02, undisturbed coastal plain soils were encountered to depths up to 5 feet below the ground surface. These soils consisted of soft to stiff highly plastic clay (CH), lean clay (CL) and silt (ML).At the time of exploration, perched water was encountered in several of the borings at a depth of approximately four feet below the ground surface. 3. We recommend that site grading be conducted during the typically drier summer months. 4. Soils encountered in the borings, excluding topsoil, should be suitable for re-use as embankment fill in roadway areas. Some near-surface soils appeared wet of optimum moisture and will likely require drying prior to their re-use as embankment fill. 5. Relatively soft soils were encountered in the majority of borings to depths of approximately 18 to 36 inches below the ground surface. These soils are expected to be suitable soils that are in a state of above-optimum moisture and lower density. We expect repair of these soils will be required.. 6. Recommended pavement sections thicknesses for the new access road and new turn lanes are presented in this report. A

1001 Boulders Parkway Suite 300 Richmond, VA 23225 P 804.200.6500 F 804.560.1016 www.timmons.com February 20, 2017 Dinwiddie County PO Box 70 Dinwiddie County, Virginia 23841 Attention: Re: Ms. Morgan Ingram Geotechnical Engineering Report Project Minecraft Access Road Boydton Plank Road Dinwiddie County, Virginia Timmons Group Project No. 37775.003 Ms. Ingram: Timmons Group is pleased to submit this geotechnical engineering report for the referenced project. The objectives of our services were to explore subsurface conditions and provide our geotechnical recommendations for site grading and pavement support. 1. PROJECT INFORMATION The site consists of newer growth brush land off of Boydton Plank Road in Dinwiddie County, Virginia. A Site Vicinity Map is shown on Figure 1. The location of the road is approximately to the south of the West End Baptist Church at 6506 Boydton Plank Road. Proposed construction will consist of a new entrance road that will intersect with Boydton Plank Road (Route 1. In addition, new right turn lane taper will be constructed off Boydton Plank Road (Route 1). The entrance road is anticipated to have an average annual daily traffic (AADT) of 1,250 vehicles with 15 percent trucks. 2. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration included a visual site reconnaissance by a representative of Timmons Group and performance of six soil hand auger borings (HA-01 through HA-06). Boring locations were selected by Timmons Group. A representative of Timmons Group established locations in the field using GPS equipment. Approximate boring locations are shown on Figure 2 in Appendix A. 1

Geotechnical Engineering Report Project No.37775.003 Project Minecraft Access Road Dinwiddie County, VA February 20, 2017 Locations of some prior borings from our Geotechnical Engineering Report dated July 29, 2016 (Timmons Group Project 38390) are also shown on Figure 2. Those borings are designated as (B- 01 to B-03). Hand auger borings were performed to depths of approximately 5 feet below the ground surface. Encountered materials were visually classified in the field. Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) tests were performed within hand auger borings at approximate one-foot depth intervals. The DCP test procedure is as follows: The cone point of the penetrometer is first seated 2 inches into the bearing materials to embed the point. Then the cone point is driven an additional 1-3/4 inches using a 15-pound weight (hammer) falling 20 inches. The cone point is then driven a second and third increment of 1-3/4 inches each and the number of hammer blows are recorded for each increment. The average penetration reading is the average of the second and third blow readings. The penetrometer reading is similar to the standard penetration resistance N-value as defined by ASTM D 1586. The penetrometer test results provide an index for estimating soil strength and relative density. Pavement cores were performed with a 4-inch diameter diamond-impregnated core barrel. Pavement section thicknesses were recorded and the core holes were backfilled with gravel and the surface was patched with compacted cold patch asphalt. Water levels were measured in open boreholes at the time of drilling. Upon completion, boreholes were then backfilled up to the original ground surface with drill cuttings. Representative portions of split-spoon soil samples and the bulk samples were returned to our laboratory for quantitative testing and visual classification in general accordance with Unified Soil Classification System guidelines. Hand Auger Boring Logs are provided in the Appendix. The Logs provide a summary of field data and approximate depths of changes in soil strata. Naturally, transitional changes in soil types are often gradual and cannot be defined at particular depths. 3. LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory testing was performed on representative split-spoon and bulk soil samples obtained from the borings. This testing consisted of natural moisture content, Atterberg limits, grain size analyses, Standard Proctor, and a California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests. Laboratory tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM procedures. Individual laboratory test data sheets are provided in the Appendix. A summary of laboratory test data is provided in the tables below. 2

Geotechnical Engineering Report Project No.37775.003 Project Minecraft Access Road Dinwiddie County, VA February 20, 2017 Natural Moisture and Classification Tests Boring Sample Depth (Feet) Natural Moisture Content (%) Atterberg Limits LL PL PI Grain Size Analysis % Sand % Fines* USCS Classification HA-01 Bulk 0-5 17.1 30 15 15 38.0 62.0 CL HA-02 S-2 1-2 13.0 26 16 10 44.7 55.3 CL HA-03 S-3 2-3 18.7 30 18 12 63.0 37.0 SC HA-04 Bulk 0-5 20.3 39 19 20 52.5 47.5 SC HA-05 Bulk 0-5 18.8 33 25 8 34.0 66.0 ML HA-06 S-1 0-1 16.4 24 15 9 28.5 71.5 CL *Material passing No. 200 sieve (clay and silt) Standard Proctor and CBR Testing Boring Depth (Feet) Natural Moisture Content (%) Standard Proctor Optimum Moisture Content (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) CBR (0.1 ) %Swell USCS Classification HA-01 Bulk 17.1 11.7 119.7 11.1 0.3 CL HA-04 Bulk 20.3 14.0 115.4 11.6 0.3 SC HA-05 Bulk 18.8 15.2 114.7 8.7 0.3 ML Based on the Atterberg limits testing, near-surface soils are of low to moderate plasticity. Based on comparison of natural moisture contents to the optimum moisture contents of the bulk samples, near-surface soils appear near to wet of optimum moisture. Drying of some near-surface soils will likely be required prior to their re-use as fill. The time of year the grading occurs will likely have a significant impact on the moisture levels of near-surface soils. 4. SITE GEOLOGY According to the 1993 Geologic Map of Virginia, the project site is located in the Coastal Plain Physiographic Province. The coastal plain is characterized by unconsolidated marine to fluvial sediments, varying from clay to gravel, poorly to well sorted, with lateral variation in thickness, although generally increasing in thickness towards the east. Vertical variation within the geologic formations of the coastal plain is often controlled by cyclic sequences that fine or coarsen with depth, with formations separated by unconformities. Regionally, the stratigraphy of the coastal plain can be generalized as a wedge of sediments composed of fluvial and coastal plain sands and gravels of Quaternary and upper Tertiary age, underlain by marine, deltaic, and fluvial clays, silts, 3

Geotechnical Engineering Report Project No.37775.003 Project Minecraft Access Road Dinwiddie County, VA February 20, 2017 and sands of lower Tertiary age, underlain by fluvial-deltaic to shallow-shelf sands and clays of Cretaceous age, underlain by crystalline bedrock. Depth to bedrock varies from tens of feet near the western extent of the coastal plain at the Fall Line (approximate Interstate I-95 corridor) to over 3,000 feet near the Atlantic coastline. According to the Map, the site appears to be locally underlain by Pliocene Sand and Gravel, which typically consists of Upper Pliocene aged deposits of fluvial sand and gravel with thin beds of clay and silt. 5. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The following is a summary of subsurface conditions encountered during the exploration. 5.1 Ground Surface Cover The borings encountered approximately 3 to 6 inches of surficial topsoil. 5.2 Existing Fill Soils Existing fill was encountered in boring HA-02 to a depth of approximately one foot below the ground surface. The fill consisted of loose silty sand (SM). The average Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) value in this soil was 9 blows per increment. 5.3 Coastal Plain Beneath the topsoil and fill in HA-02, undisturbed coastal plain soils were encountered to depths up to 5 feet below the ground surface. These soils consisted of soft to stiff highly plastic clay (CH), lean clay (CL), silt (ML) and loose to medium dense clayey sand (SC). Average Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) values in these soils were 1 and 14 blows per increment. 5.4 Groundwater At the time of the exploration, perched groundwater water was encountered in borings HA-01, HA-02, and HA-04 at a depth of approximately four feet below the ground surface. It is important to realize that groundwater levels will fluctuate with changes in rainfall and evaporation rates. In addition, perched groundwater could be encountered within near-surface soils, particularly after rainfall. 6. EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION THICKNESSES Pavement cores were performed along Boydton Plank Road (Route 1) to measure existing pavement section thicknesses. The cores encountered asphalt pavement underlain by concrete. 4

Geotechnical Engineering Report Project No.37775.003 Project Minecraft Access Road Dinwiddie County, VA February 20, 2017 The core barrel was unable to penetrate the concrete base material beneath the asphalt. A summary of the encountered pavement and concrete thicknesses are summarized in the table below. Pavement core photographs are provided in Appendix D. Core Measured Pavement Section Thicknesses Core Location Asphalt Thickness (inches) Concrete Thickness (inches) C-01 Boydton Plan Road 6.5 2.0* C-02 Boydton Plank Road 6.5 Not Sampled C-03 Boydton Plank Road 6.0 Not Sampled * Refusal of core bit occurred after penetrating 2 inches into concrete. 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following conclusions and recommendations are based upon our borings, laboratory testing, engineering analysis, and past experience with similar projects and subsurface conditions. When reviewing our recommendations, it is important to note the prior development activities have occurred at this site. Based on our past experience with previously developed sites, unexpected subsurface conditions are often encountered. These conditions could include additional zones of low-consistency fill, debris-laden materials, abandoned utilities, and others. These conditions, if encountered, can be addressed by on-site engineering evaluation at the time of construction. 7.1 Site Preparation 7.1.1 General Site grading will be difficult during periods of extended rainfall and low temperatures that generally occur during the winter months. Near-surface soils are very moisture sensitive. Heavy rubber-tired construction equipment should not be allowed to operate on wet or unstable subgrades at this site due to the potential for rutting and other damage to the soils. To reduce potential earthwork problems, site preparation and grading should be scheduled during the typically drier summer months, if possible. We recommend that exposed subgrades be sloped and sealed at the end of each day to promote runoff and reduce infiltration from rainfall. Site preparation should begin with clearing and grubbing of trees, stripping of topsoil, and removal of any other unsuitable materials. Approximately 3 to 6 inches of topsoil was encountered in the borings. However, stripping activities often mix topsoil with underlying clean soils and cause 5

Geotechnical Engineering Report Project No.37775.003 Project Minecraft Access Road Dinwiddie County, VA February 20, 2017 stripping depths to be greater than actual topsoil depths, particularly during wet periods of the year. Topsoil should be wasted from the site or permanently stockpiled outside the proposed construction limits. 7.1.2 Subgrade Evaluation After stripping, subgrades that will receive embankment fill and finished subgrades should be evaluated by the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative. To aid the engineer during this evaluation, exposed soil subgrades should be proofrolled with a loaded tandem axle dump truck or equivalent. Proofrolling will help to reveal the presence of unstable or otherwise unsuitable surface materials. The following methods are typically used to repair soil subgrades that are observed to rut, pump, or deflect excessively during proofrolling: Undercut the unstable soils to firm soils and replace them with suitable, well compacted fill. In-place repair of near-surface soils by scarifying, drying and recompacting, when weather conditions are suitable. 7.1.3 Undercut Potential The majority of borings encountered relatively soft near-surface soils to depths ranging from 1.5 to 3 feet below the ground surface. We expect that repair of soils could be required to these depths. The amount of repairs will likely depend on the in-place density of the soil, the soil moisture content, level of construction traffic on exposed subgrades prior to proofrolling, and prevailing weather conditions at the time of grading. Performing grading in a period of hot and dry weather will likely increase the potential that some soft subgrade soils can be densified in place. 7.2 Excavations We expect that excavations will extend through moderate consistency soils. Past experience indicates that moderate consistency soils can be excavated by routine earth moving equipment. Soil types with respect to trench safety must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The Contractor should be responsible for all site safety, including the determination of appropriate trench safety measures according to OSHA guidelines. 7.3 Embankment Fill The following sections provide our recommendations for embankment fill materials and their placement. Site preparation, including embankment fill placement and compaction, should be observed by a VDOT-certified soils technician working under the direction of the Geotechnical 6

Geotechnical Engineering Report Project No.37775.003 Project Minecraft Access Road Dinwiddie County, VA February 20, 2017 Engineer. During fill placement, a sufficient amount of in-place density tests should be conducted to confirm that compaction and fill moisture is in accordance with our recommendations. 7.3.1 Embankment Fill Materials Embankment fill should contain less than 5 percent organics or debris, have a maximum particle size of 3 inches, have a maximum liquid limit (LL) of 50, and have a maximum plasticity index (PI) of 25. Embankment fill placed within 3 feet of finished soil subgrade must meet the design CBR of 6.9 (VDOT Test Method VTM 8). These requirements apply for on-site or imported embankment fill materials. 7.3.2 Re-use of On-Site Soils as Embankment Fill Based on visual observation and comparison of the measured natural moisture contents of the bulk soil samples to the optimum moisture contents from the standard Proctor tests, near-surface soils appeared to be near to wet of optimum moisture. Prevailing weather conditions will have a significant impact on the amount of moisture manipulation (i.e., drying or wetting) required prior to embankment fill placement. However, based on our exploration, drying of some on-site soils should be anticipated prior to their reuse as embankment fill. Fine grained soils are often difficult to dry and manipulate, even during favorable weather conditions. 7.3.3 Compaction Recommendations Embankment fill material should be placed compacted in accordance with the latest edition of the VDOT Road and Bridge Specifications. Embankment fill testing should be performed in accordance with the procedures and sampling frequencies in Section 309 of the VDOT Manual of Instruction, Chapter III. 7.3.4 CBR Testing of Subgrade Materials Sufficient California Bearing Ratio (CBR) testing of embankment fill and finished subgrade soils should be conducted during construction to adequately represent the soils encountered on the project. CBR testing should be conducted in accordance with VDOT Method VTM 8. We recommend that CBR testing be performed for every 2,000 cubic yards of embankment fill placed and every 500 linear feet in areas receiving excavation to reach finished subgrade. A design CBR of 6.9 was used for this project. Any soils that do not meet the design CBR should not be placed as embankment fill within 3 feet of finished soil subgrade. For areas that receive excavation to reach finished grade, any in-place soils that do not meet the design CBR should be removed to a of 2 feet below finished soil subgrade and replaced with suitable materials that meet the design CBR. 7

Geotechnical Engineering Report Project No.37775.003 Project Minecraft Access Road Dinwiddie County, VA February 20, 2017 7.4 Pavement Support Because the entrance road is a secondary road with a relatively low annual daily traffic (ADT) of 1,250 vehicles (15% trucks), the pavement analyses for this road was conducted using the VDOT 2014 Pavement Design Guide for Subdivision and Secondary Roads in Virginia. A design California Bearing Ratio (CBR) value of 6.9 percent was used (two-thirds of the average measured CBR values stated in this report). Pavement analyses are provided in Appendix E. According to our pavement analysis, the minimum required pavement sections for the new access road is approximately 6 inches of asphalt over 8 inches of base. We have assumed the turn lanes off of Boydton Plank Road (Route 1) will have the same traffic load conditions, and the required asphalt pavement thickness for the access road is approximately the same thickness existing asphalt pavement along Boydton Plank Road. Therefore, we recommend the new access road and turn lane taper have the same pavement section thickness, as shown in the following table. Recommended Pavement Section Minecraft Access Road and New Turn Lanes 2 Inches VDOT SM-12.5A (Placed in single lift) 4 Inches VDOT BM-25.0A (Placed in single lift) 8 Inches VDOT 21B All materials and construction methods should conform to the latest edition of the VDOT Road and Bridge Specifications. To confirm that the base course stone has been uniformly compacted and meets VDOT density requirements, in-place density tests should be performed by a qualified soils technician and the area should be thoroughly proofrolled under his observation. Important factors regarding pavement performance are the condition of subgrade soils at time of construction and post construction drainage. We recommend that all pavement subgrade areas be evaluated prior to base course stone placement. Any areas which deflect or rut during proofrolling must be repaired prior to stone placement. Sufficient testing and observation should be performed during pavement construction to confirm that the required thickness, density, and quality requirements of the specifications are followed. 8

APPENDIX A FIGURES

NORTH APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION Source: Google Maps SCALE: NTS CHECKED BY: JNR PLOTTED BY: DATE: JMR 11-10-2016 PROJECT NUMBER: 37775.003 SITE VICINITY MAP PROJECT MINECRAFT ACCESS ROAD BOYDTON PLANK ROAD DINWIDDIE COUNTY, VA FIGURE 1

187 186 184 187 186 1 K:\Geotechnical\PROJECTS\2016 Projects\---COMPLETED PROJECTS FOLDER ---\37775.003 Minecraft Entrance Road\Drafting\Boring Location Plan.dwg Plotted on 2/20/2017 2:42 PM by Julian Ruffin 183 184 185 186 01 187 202 203 187 187 204 C-01 188 188 205 206 C-02 207 HA-03 189 C-03 208 189 209 BOYDTON PLANK ROAD 210 11 189 HA-01 HA-02 101 HA-04 188 185 188 187 187 186 189 187 188 184 184 185 186 B-01 102 185 188 103 188 HA-05 104 187 191 189 189 105 188 189 190 190 B-02 186 188 185 106 183 182 178 179 180 181 HA-06 107 187 187 177 108 187 NAD 83 SCALE 1"=150' 109 0 150' 300' APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PREVIOUS TEST BORING APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF HAND AUGER BORING 110 110+26.02 B-03 186 18 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ASPHALT CORE 188 YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. THIS DRAWING PREPARED AT THE Corporate Headquarters 1001 Boulders Parkway Richmond, VA 23225 TEL 804.200.6500 FAX 804.560.1016 www.timmons.com 2 SHEET NO. 38390 JOB NO. PROJECT MINECRAFT ACCESS ROAD DINWIDDIE COUNTY - VIRGINIA LOCATION PLAN These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP. AS SHOWN SCALE N. REEVES CHECKED BY N. REEVES DESIGNED BY J. RUFFIN DRAWN BY 10/11/2016 DATE DATE... REVISION DESCRIPTION

APPENDIX B BORING LOGS

Project: PROJECT MINECRAFT ACCESS ROAD Project No: 37775.003 Performed By: J. Ruffin Date Boring 10/27/2016 HA-01 10/27/2016 HA-02 10/27/2016 HA-03 Depth (Feet) HAND AUGER BORING LOG Description Depth (Feet) 1 2 3 Average 0 Topsoil (6 Inches) (Groundwater at 4 feet) 0 3 6 6 6 0.5 Sandy Silt (ML), moist, medium stiff, gray, contains roots 0.5 1 Sandy Lean Clay (CL), wet, soft, light brownish gray 1 5 4 4 4 2 Change: very soft 2 2 1 2 1 3 Change: soft, light orangeish brown and gray 3 2 2 3 2 4 Change: medium stiff 4 4 7 8 7 5 Hand Auger Terminated 5 0 Topsoil (3 Inches) (Groundwater at 4 feet) 0 6 9 9 9 0.25 Fill-Silty Sand (SM), fine to medium grained, moist, loose, 0.25 gray 1 Sandy Fat Clay (CH), moist, soft, light brownish gray 1 6 4 3 3 2 Sandy Lean Clay (CL), moist, medium stiff, light orangeish 2 4 5 6 5 brown 3 Change: stiff, light orangeish brown and gray 3 6 9 10 9 4 Sandy Fat Clay (CH), wet, medium stiff, light orangeish 4 6 7 9 8 brown and gray 5 Hand Auger Terminated 5 0 Topsoil (3 Inches) 0 5 9 8 8 0.25 Sandy Silt (ML), moist, medium stiff, gray 0.25 1 Sandy Fat Clay (CH), moist, soft, orangeish brown and gray 1 3 2 3 2 2 Clayey Sand (SC), fine to medium, moist, medium dense, 2 12 10 12 11 light orangeish brown and gray 3 Change: orangeish gray and gray 3 8 10 12 11 4 4 10 12 14 13 5 Hand Auger Terminated 5 The dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) test procedure is as follows: The cone point of the penetrometer is first seated 2 inches into the bearing materials to embed the point. Then the cone point is driven an additional 1-3/4 inches using a 15-pound weight falling 20 inches. The penetrometer reading is the number of blows required to drive the cone point 1-3/4 inches. DCP Values

Project: PROJECT MINECRAFT ACCESS ROAD Project No: 37775.003 Performed By: J. Ruffin HAND AUGER BORING LOG Date Boring 10/27/2016 HA-04 10/27/2016 HA-05 10/27/2016 HA-06 Depth (Feet) Description Depth (Feet) DCP Values 1 2 3 Average 0 Topsoil (4 Inches) (Groundwater at 4 feet) 0 6 7 5 6 0.33 Sandy Silt (ML), moist, medium stiff, gray 0.33 1 Sandy Fat Clay (CH), moist, soft, orangeish brown and gray 1 3 3 3 3 2 Clayey Sand (SC), fine to medium grained, moist, loose, 2 4 6 7 6 orangeish brown 3 3 10 6 8 7 4 Sandy Fat Clay (CH), wet, stiff, orangeish brown and gray 4 12 13 16 14 5 Hand Auger Terminated 5 0 Topsoil (5 Inches) 0 2 4 4 4 0.4 Sandy Lean Clay (CL), moist, soft, gray 0.4 1 Sandy Silt (ML), moist, soft, light orangeish brown and gray 1 3 2 5 3 2 2 6 7 7 7 3 Change: stiff 3 8 9 10 9 4 4 8 9 16 12 5 Hand Auger Terminated 5 0 Topsoil (3 Inches) 0 3 5 6 5 0.25 Lean Clay with Sand (CL), moist, medium stiff, light gray, 0.25 contains roots 1 Change: soft, light brown and gray 1 2 3 4 3 2 Change: Sandy Lean Clay (CL), medium stiff, light orangeish 2 4 6 7 6 brown and gray 3 3 8 8 9 8 4 Change: stiff 4 5 13 12 12 5 Hand Auger Terminated 5 The dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) test procedure is as follows: The cone point of the penetrometer is first seated 2 inches into the bearing materials to embed the point. Then the cone point is driven an additional 1-3/4 inches using a 15-pound weight falling 20 inches. The penetrometer reading is the number of blows required to drive the cone point 1-3/4 inches.

TG GEOTECH BH LOG V2.0 - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 15/6/16 10:11 - K:\GEOTECHNICAL\PROJECTS\2016 PROJECTS\38390 PROJECT MINECRAFT - FINAL GEOTECH PHASE\FINANCIAL\37316 PATTON MINECRAFT\LOGS\PATTON MINECRAFT.GPJ PROJECT NUMBER 37316 CLIENT DRILLING CONTRACTOR LOGGED BY NOTES DEPTH (ft) 0 5 10 ELEVATION (ft) 185 180 AM King Construction Julian Ruffin TOPSOIL: (4 Inches) SANDY FAT CLAY, (CH): grayish brown, moist (CH): medium stiff Landmark Drilling, Inc. DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger MATERIAL DESCRIPTION CLAYEY SAND, (SC): gray, fine to medium grained, moist, medium dense SANDY FAT CLAY, (CH): orangeish brown and gray, moist, very stiff (CH): brown and gray, stiff Timmons Group 1001 Boulders Parkway, suite 300 23225 DATE STARTED 9/10/2015 COMPLETED 9/10/2015 CHECKED BY Bottom of borehole at 10.0 feet. SYMBOL PROJECT NAME PROJECT LOCATION GROUND ELEVATION SAMPLING BLOW COUNTS (N-VALUE) S-1, SPT 2-2-2-2 (4) S-2, SPT 2-4-4-6 (8) S-3, SPT 5-7-12-14 (19) S-4, SPT 9-14-13-11 (27) S-5, SPT 3-4-7-11 (11) POCKET PEN. (tsf) 186 ft BOREHOLE WATER LEVELS: AT END OF DRILLING Project Minecraft Patton AT 24 HOURS DRILLING --- Dinwiddie County, Virginia LAB TESTS HOLE DEPTH --- not encountered BORING B-01 PAGE 1 OF 1 CAVE DEPTH 10 feet REMARKS

TG GEOTECH BH LOG V2.0 - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 15/6/16 10:11 - K:\GEOTECHNICAL\PROJECTS\2016 PROJECTS\38390 PROJECT MINECRAFT - FINAL GEOTECH PHASE\FINANCIAL\37316 PATTON MINECRAFT\LOGS\PATTON MINECRAFT.GPJ PROJECT NUMBER 37316 CLIENT DRILLING CONTRACTOR LOGGED BY NOTES DEPTH (ft) 0 5 10 ELEVATION (ft) 185 180 AM King Construction Julian Ruffin Landmark Drilling, Inc. DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger Timmons Group 1001 Boulders Parkway, suite 300 23225 DATE STARTED 9/10/2015 COMPLETED 9/10/2015 CHECKED BY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION TOPSOIL: (4 Inches) SANDY LEAN CLAY, (CL): brown, moist, medium stiff CLAYEY SAND, (SC): brown and gray, fine to medium grained, moist, loose SILTY SAND, (SM): reddish brown, fine to medium grained, moist, medium dense SANDY FAT CLAY, (CH): orangeish brown and gray, moist, stiff Bottom of borehole at 10.0 feet. SYMBOL PROJECT NAME PROJECT LOCATION GROUND ELEVATION SAMPLING BLOW COUNTS (N-VALUE) S-1, SPT 2-3-3-2 (6) S-2, SPT 2-3-5-5 (8) S-3, SPT 7-9-10-12 (19) S-4, SPT 5-5-7-11 (12) S-5, SPT 3-6-9-10 (15) POCKET PEN. (tsf) 186 ft BOREHOLE WATER LEVELS: AT END OF DRILLING Project Minecraft Patton AT 24 HOURS DRILLING --- Dinwiddie County, Virginia LAB TESTS HOLE DEPTH --- not encountered BORING B-02 PAGE 1 OF 1 CAVE DEPTH 10 feet REMARKS

TG GEOTECH BH LOG V2.0 - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 15/6/16 10:11 - K:\GEOTECHNICAL\PROJECTS\2016 PROJECTS\38390 PROJECT MINECRAFT - FINAL GEOTECH PHASE\FINANCIAL\37316 PATTON MINECRAFT\LOGS\PATTON MINECRAFT.GPJ PROJECT NUMBER 37316 CLIENT DRILLING CONTRACTOR LOGGED BY NOTES DEPTH (ft) 0 5 10 ELEVATION (ft) 185 180 AM King Construction Julian Ruffin TOPSOIL: (4 Inches) SANDY SILT, (ML): grayish brown, moist, medium stiff SANDY LEAN CLAY, (CL): brown and gray, moist (CL): stiff CLAYEY SAND, (SC): gray, fine to medium grained, moist, medium dense Brown and gray Landmark Drilling, Inc. DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger Timmons Group 1001 Boulders Parkway, suite 300 23225 DATE STARTED 9/10/2015 COMPLETED 9/10/2015 CHECKED BY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Bottom of borehole at 10.0 feet. SYMBOL PROJECT NAME PROJECT LOCATION GROUND ELEVATION SAMPLING BLOW COUNTS (N-VALUE) S-1, SPT 3-3-4-6 (7) S-2, SPT 5-8-10-12 (18) S-3, SPT 5-6-6-9 (12) S-4, SPT 7-10-13-13 (23) S-5, SPT 3-4-7-8 (11) POCKET PEN. (tsf) 187 ft BOREHOLE WATER LEVELS: AT END OF DRILLING Project Minecraft Patton AT 24 HOURS DRILLING --- Dinwiddie County, Virginia LAB TESTS HOLE DEPTH --- not encountered BORING B-03 PAGE 1 OF 1 CAVE DEPTH 10 feet REMARKS

APPENDIX C LABORATORY TEST RESULTS

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT Project Number Project Name Location 37775.003 Minecraft Entrance Road HA-05 Bulk/ 0-5 Liquid Limit Plastic Index USCS AASHTO 33 8 ML A-4 (0.0) Percent Gravel Percent Sand Percent Silt and Clay 0.0% 34.0% 66.0% Material Description Sandy SILT Natural Moisture 18.8% SPT Blow Counts N/A Grain Size Distribution 100 #4 #10 #40 #200 90 80 70 Percent Finer 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 Grain Size - mm DATE 12/13/16 FIGURE NUMBER GS4

PROCTOR TEST REPORT Project Number 37775.003 Project Name Minecraft Entrance Road Location HA-05 Bulk/ 0-5 Maximum Dry Density, pcf Optimum Moisture Material Description Sandy SILT Uncorrected 114.7 15.2 Rock Corrected Results 114.7 15.2 USCS Natural Moisture Liquid Limit ML AASHTO A-4 (0.0) 18.8% Percent Fines 66.0% 33 Plastic Index 8 Moisture-Density Curve 140.0 130.0 Dry Density, pcf 120.0 110.0 100.0 90.0 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% Water Content DATE 12/13/16 FIGURE NUMBER PR2

CBR TEST REPORT Project Number 37775.003 Project Name Minecraft Entrance Road Location HA-05 Bulk/ 0-5 *NOTE: 10 lbs. surcharge weights in place during soak and loading CBR at.1" CBR at.2 " Swell 8.7 9.5 0.3% Dry Density Moisture Compaction Molded 114.8 14.7% 100.1% Soaked 113.3 16.2% 98.8% Material Description Sandy SILT USCS Natural Moisture Liquid Limit Maximum Dry Density ML 18.8% 33 114.7 AASHTO Percent Fines Plastic Index Optimum Moisture A-4 (0.0) 66.0% 8 15.2 300 2.0% 1.8% 250 1.6% Penetration Resistance, psi 200 150 100 Swell 1.4% 1.2% 1.0% 0.8% 0.6% 50 0.4% 0.2% 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Penetration, Inches 0.0% 0 48 96 Time, hours DATE 12/13/16 FIGURE NUMBER CBR 1

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT Project Number Project Name Location 37775.003 Minecraft Entrance Road HA-04 Bulk/ 0-5 Liquid Limit Plastic Index USCS AASHTO 39 20 SC A-6 (3.3) Percent Gravel Percent Sand Percent Silt and Clay 0.0% 52.5% 47.5% Material Description Clayey SAND Natural Moisture 20.3% SPT Blow Counts N/A Grain Size Distribution 100 #4 #10 #40 #200 90 80 70 Percent Finer 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 Grain Size - mm DATE 12/13/16 FIGURE NUMBER GS4

PROCTOR TEST REPORT Project Number 37775.003 Project Name Minecraft Entrance Road Location HA-04 Bulk/ 0-5 Maximum Dry Density, pcf Optimum Moisture Material Description Clayey SAND Uncorrected 115.4 14.0 Rock Corrected Results 115.4 14.0 USCS Natural Moisture Liquid Limit SC AASHTO A-6 (3.3) 20.3% Percent Fines 47.5% 39 Plastic Index 20 Moisture-Density Curve 140.0 130.0 Dry Density, pcf 120.0 110.0 100.0 90.0 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% Water Content DATE 12/13/16 FIGURE NUMBER PR2

CBR TEST REPORT Project Number 37775.003 Project Name Minecraft Entrance Road Location HA-04 Bulk/ 0-5 *NOTE: 10 lbs. surcharge weights in place during soak and loading CBR at.1" CBR at.2 " Swell 11.6 11.5 0.3% Dry Density Moisture Compaction Molded 117.2 14.2% 101.6% Soaked 116.4 15.0% 100.9% Material Description Clayey SAND USCS Natural Moisture Liquid Limit Maximum Dry Density SC 20.3% 39 115.4 AASHTO Percent Fines Plastic Index Optimum Moisture A-6 (3.3) 47.5% 20 14.0 350 2.0% 300 1.8% 1.6% Penetration Resistance, psi 250 200 150 100 Swell 1.4% 1.2% 1.0% 0.8% 0.6% 50 0.4% 0.2% 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Penetration, Inches 0.0% 0 48 96 Time, hours DATE 12/13/16 FIGURE NUMBER CBR 1

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT Project Number Project Name Location 37775.003 Minecraft Entrance Road HA-01 Bulk/ 0-5 Liquid Limit Plastic Index USCS AASHTO 30 15 CL A-6 (2.3) Percent Gravel Percent Sand Percent Silt and Clay 0.0% 38.0% 62.0% Material Description Sandy Lean CLAY Natural Moisture 17.1% SPT Blow Counts N/A Grain Size Distribution 100 #4 #10 #40 #200 90 80 70 Percent Finer 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 Grain Size - mm DATE 12/13/16 FIGURE NUMBER GS4

PROCTOR TEST REPORT Project Number 37775.003 Project Name Minecraft Entrance Road Location HA-01 Bulk/ 0-5 Maximum Dry Density, pcf Optimum Moisture Material Description Uncorrected 119.7 11.7 Sandy Lean CLAY Rock Corrected Results 119.7 11.7 USCS Natural Moisture Liquid Limit CL AASHTO A-6 (2.3) 17.1% Percent Fines 62.0% 30 Plastic Index 15 Moisture-Density Curve 140.0 130.0 Dry Density, pcf 120.0 110.0 100.0 90.0 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% Water Content DATE 12/13/16 FIGURE NUMBER PR2

CBR TEST REPORT Project Number 37775.003 Project Name Minecraft Entrance Road Location HA-01 Bulk/ 0-5 *NOTE:10 lbs. surcharge weights in place during soak and loading CBR at.1" CBR at.2 " Swell 11.1 11.2 0.3% Dry Density Moisture Compaction Molded 120.8 10.9% 100.9% Soaked 118.8 12.8% 99.2% Material Description Sandy Lean CLAY USCS Natural Moisture Liquid Limit Maximum Dry Density CL 17.1% 30 119.7 AASHTO Percent Fines Plastic Index Optimum Moisture A-6 (2.3) 62.0% 15 11.7 350 2.0% 300 1.8% 1.6% Penetration Resistance, psi 250 200 150 100 Swell 1.4% 1.2% 1.0% 0.8% 0.6% 50 0.4% 0.2% 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Penetration, Inches 0.0% 0 48 96 Time, hours DATE 12/13/16 FIGURE NUMBER CBR 1

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT Project Number Project Name Location 37775.003 Minecraft Entrance Road HA-02/ 1-2 Liquid Limit Plastic Index USCS AASHTO 26 10 CL A-4 (0.0) Percent Gravel Percent Sand Percent Silt and Clay 0.0% 44.7% 55.3% Material Description Sandy Lean CLAY Natural Moisture 13.0% SPT Blow Counts 6-4-3 Grain Size Distribution 100 #4 #10 #40 #200 90 80 70 Percent Finer 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 Grain Size - mm DATE 12/13/16 FIGURE NUMBER GS4

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT Project Number Project Name Location 37775.003 Minecraft Entrance Road HA-03/ 2-3 Liquid Limit Plastic Index USCS AASHTO 30 12 SC A-6 (0.4) Percent Gravel Percent Sand Percent Silt and Clay 0.0% 63.0% 37.0% Material Description Clayey SAND Natural Moisture 18.7% SPT Blow Counts 12-10-12 Grain Size Distribution 100 #4 #10 #40 #200 90 80 70 Percent Finer 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 Grain Size - mm DATE 12/13/16 FIGURE NUMBER GS4

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT Project Number Project Name Location 37775.003 Minecraft Entrance Road HA-06/ 0-1 Liquid Limit Plastic Index USCS AASHTO 24 9 CL A-4 (0.0) Percent Gravel Percent Sand Percent Silt and Clay 0.0% 28.5% 71.5% Material Description Lean CLAY with Sand Natural Moisture 16.4% SPT Blow Counts 3-5-6 Grain Size Distribution 100 #4 #10 #40 #200 90 80 70 Percent Finer 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 Grain Size - mm DATE 12/13/16 FIGURE NUMBER GS4

APPENDIX D ASPHALT CORE PHOTOS

C-01 6.5 INCHES ASPHALT 2.0 INCHES CEMENT TREATED BASE* *CORE BARREL REFUSAL IN CEMENT TREATED BASE C-02 6.5 INCHES ASPHALT CORE BARREL REFUSAL IN CEMENT TREATED BASE SCALE: NTS CHECKED BY: JNR PLOTTED BY: JMR DATE: 11-22-2016 PROJECT NUMBER: 37775.003 ASPHALT CORE LOG PROJECT MINECRAFT ACCESS ROAD BOYDTON PLANK ROAD DINWIDDIE COUNTY, VA FIGURE 1

C-03 6.0 INCHES ASPHALT SCALE: NTS CHECKED BY: JNR PLOTTED BY: DATE: JMR 11-22-2016 PROJECT NUMBER: 37775.003 ASPHALT CORE LOG PROJECT MINECRAFT ACCESS ROAD BOYDTON PLANK ROAD DINWIDDIE COUNTY, VA FIGURE 2

APPENDIX E PAVEMENT CALCULATIONS